今日综述:本日共全量采集并深度研判来自全球各大主流语系与核心地缘区域的 1 份权威报刊与学术特刊。
英国及英联邦 (United Kingdom & Commonwealth) - 《Financial Times - 28.08.2026.pdf》尼泊尔洪灾致389人死亡 中国边境展开大规模救援:尼泊尔洪灾已致至少389人死亡,中国报告3人死亡,两国失踪人员超过1400人。中尼边境开展大规模救援,中国警告周边山体滑坡与泥石流风险。尼泊尔总理沙阿承诺团结应对灾难,科学家警告喜马拉雅地区升温加速导致此类洪水更频繁。 - 《Financial Times - 28.08.2026.pdf》英国庇护申请人数下降21% 小型船只抵达减少近四分之一:2026年6月结束的年度内,英国庇护申请人数下降21%,至近8.6万人,小型船只抵达减少近四分之一。内政大臣推出移民改革措施后,庇护酒店入住人数降至历史低点16,021人。专家认为欧洲整体庇护申请减少是主要驱动因素。 - 《Financial Times - 28.08.2026.pdf》卢森堡天然气工业银行涉嫌违反欧盟制裁被调查:卢森堡天然气工业银行被指仅提前两周通知债券交换计划,引发监管审视。该行否认不当行为,称严格遵守欧盟及卢森堡法律。俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司因西方制裁难以支付债券利息,债券交易价格暴跌。
💡 各大报刊的报道脉络呈现出高度多维的地缘博弈、制度转型、社会痛感与前沿科学突破。读者可通过下方【今日跨报思想雷达总矩阵】快速把握各报最具穿透力的思想理论对话与生活世界痛感切入点,或在【全景报刊分卷】中按区域细读每份大报的具体文章精要、制度权力批判与理性情感辩证。
本矩阵自动系统汇编当日全球报刊最具穿透力的 【思想与文化深思切入点】 与 【生活世界痛感切入点】,为学者提供一站式理论对话与现象学经验索引:
尼泊尔洪灾致389人死亡 中国边境展开大规模救援
暂无制度批判分析。
暂无情感辩证分析。
2026年8月28日,星期五

非法干细胞疗法诊所销售乱象 深度报道,第19版
英国 £3.70;爱尔兰共和国 €4.10
英国国债收益率上升被误读的经济信号 斯蒂芬·米兰,第21版
一名警察在尼泊尔突发洪水过后查看灾情。据该国警方称,洪水已造成至少389人死亡。中国方面报告了3人死亡,两国确认失踪人数超过1,400人。
在两国边境展开大规模救援行动的同时,中国发出持续风险警告。一位官员表示:“周边山体随时可能发生山体滑坡,且仍存在次生泥石流风险。”
尼泊尔总理巴伦德拉·沙阿表示:“我们将怀着希望与信念共同面对这场灾难。”
科学家表示,目前尚无法确定灾害原因,但警告称随着喜马拉雅地区升温速度超过全球平均水平,此类突发洪水正变得更加频繁且更为严重。更多风险信息见第6版

Niranjan Shrestha / AP Photo
• 指控严重管理不当 • 寻求从库什纳公司获取文件 • 再次呼吁更换领导层
塞缪尔·阿吉尼——摩纳哥 罗伯特·奥尔——伦敦
欧洲足球管理机构欧足联昨日透露,正准备就国际足联主席詹尼·因凡蒂诺未能成功出售世界杯商业权股权一事对其提起刑事诉讼。
在向美国法院提交的文件中,欧足联表示正在寻求从约书亚·库什纳、其投资公司兴盛资本及国际足联美洲区机构获取文件,同时推进将因凡蒂诺逐出国际足联的努力。
文件显示,欧足联“正准备在瑞士对因凡蒂诺及可能涉及的其他国际足联官员和顾问提起刑事诉讼,指控其严重管理不当”。
约书亚·库什纳是兴盛资本的创始人,同时也是唐纳德·特朗普女婿贾里德·库什纳的哥哥。
欧足联在其看到的文件中表示,因凡蒂诺的计划试图通过出售国际足联20%商业权股权筹集$4。然而,该提议实体$20的估值“低得荒谬”。
国际足联未回应置评请求。
此次法律行动是在欧足联试图继续对因凡蒂诺的计划施压之际发生的。该计划本将把国际足联的商业活动与其作为足球管理机构及规则制定者的角色分离。
欧足联高管、欧洲国际足联理事会成员及该地区足球协会负责人昨日在摩纳哥召开会议,商讨下一步行动。
欧足联在声明中表示,与会者已支持其通过“一切可行的制度、政治及法律途径”推动“基本改革、恢复对主席权力的适当限制,并确保国际足联再次作为一个机构而非围绕个人进行治理”。
欧洲足球管理机构此前威胁将抵制国际足联运营的所有赛事,但在因凡蒂诺计划公开后昨日确认,将允许其球队参加即将在波兰举行的U20女子世界杯。
欧足联表示,已获国际足联保证“FFE项目已被彻底永久撤回”,且“不会以任何形式、结构、名称或面貌重现”。
因凡蒂诺已承认其作为扩大足球赛事的盈利手段而推介的投资提案存在处理不当,并承诺将进行审查。
欧足联呼吁进行“名副其实的独立外部审查”,因国际足联“不能自行调查并期待足球界简单接受其结论”。因凡蒂诺计划于3月寻求连任,其反对者尚未推出对手候选人。欧足联重申其对新领导层的诉求,并表示若因凡蒂诺继续谋求连任,将与盟友合作寻找“可信的替代方案”。
因凡蒂诺的股权出售计划曾令世界足坛出现分歧:欧足联及其美洲和加勒比地区同行拒绝该提案,而非洲足联及南美和中东地区协会则表示支持。
沙特阿拉伯被国际足联选定为2034年世界杯东道主,昨日成为最新支持者,并对因凡蒂诺放弃出售计划表示欢迎,称其“对全球足球发展的贡献应予以认可”。
华盛顿因欧洲防务缺口斥责盟友 美国已斥责其军事能力缺口被北约彩色评估描述为“红色海洋”的欧洲盟友,同时白宫正权衡如何尽快从欧洲大陆撤军。—— 第4页
▶ 寻求庇护申请下降五分之一 截至6月的一年里,近86,000人申请庇护,较前12个月下降21%,同时第二季度寄宿酒店人数降至新低。—— 第3页
▶ 伦敦IPO希望升温 Unique X,一家为迪士尼和华纳兄弟发现公司提供影院软件的集团,正在伦敦探索IPO,估值为£300mn,有望为低迷的股市带来福音。—— 第7页
▶ 私募股权支付税改前激增 在英国税务海关总署(HMRC)去年大幅调整利润征税方式前,英国私募股权分成支付激增逾50%,达到£5.4。—— 第7页
▶ “尼特族”总数下降 英国未接受教育、就业或培训的年轻人数量已降至1mn以下,但仍处于近13年来第二高位,为981,000人。—— 第2页
哈佛大学转向海外 这所美国精英商学院在唐纳德·特朗普威胁扣留其国际学生签证后,首次探索在欧洲和加拿大为MBA学生授课。—— 第6页
英伟达上调展望 这家市值5万亿加元的科技巨头预测明年销售额将增长70%,试图反驳其与客户的投资和融资交易构成高风险循环融资的批评。—— 第8页
加沙委员会内部分歧加剧 以色列正考虑驱逐 英国及潜在其他 欧洲官员,以报复其对 本杰明·内塔尼亚胡的批评,这些官员参与战后加沙协调中心工作。—— 第6页
零售大亨阿什利嘲讽伯纳姆的高街复兴计划为“痴人说梦”
随着吸烟人数下降,大型烟草企业将尼古丁口袋视为增长引擎。这种置于唇齿间的小袋被视为比香烟危害更小,但随着用户养成习惯,他们对低强度尼古丁产品的耐受性会增强。如今,在制造商争夺美国$5bn市场主导权之际,高强度口袋已获监管批准。健康专家对此并不认可,警告称一代人正面临“终身成瘾”的风险。强效之战 > 第8页
ASHLEY ARMSTRONG 商业记者
麦克·阿什利昨日抨击安迪·伯纳姆振兴实体商业街的计划为“痴人说梦”,并警告称除非减税,否则市中心将“进一步遭到破坏”。
这位零售亿万富翁的猛烈抨击出现在致首相的信中,该信已被《金融时报》看到。此前一天,伯纳姆试图安抚企业紧张情绪,表示希望“减轻”企业压力。
这位首相将振兴商业街作为其核心政策之一,并提议通过提高零售商自有仓库的商业税来为酒吧和俱乐部的商业税减免提供资金。
阿什利将该提议斥为“简直是痴人说梦”。
他在信中表示:“您关于在下次预算案中重新审视商业税的言论固然值得欢迎,但坦率地说,这不过是亡羊补牢。”他敦促首相避免追随“只解决部分问题的潮流”。
阿什利旗下店铺包括Sports Direct、House of Fraser和Flannels,他还拒绝了伯纳姆授予地方议会更多权力以阻止“可疑”电子烟店和成人游戏中心开业的提议。
这位亿万富翁写道:“对根本商业挑战的短视或迎合民粹的反应不是答案。”
“您有机会做出改变,否则将严重失误……敌对的商业环境不能再持续下去,否则商业街将进一步遭到破坏。”
他随后附和了英国保守党贵族、前玛莎百货首席执行官斯图尔特·罗斯勋爵的近期言论,后者称伯纳姆的计划“不过是满口胡言”。
阿什利已从破产管理中收购了一系列零售商。最近他收购了奢侈品百货Harvey Nichols,并表示正在“拯救另一家伟大的英国零售商免于财务灭亡”,同时抨击“雇佣成本急剧上升”。
这位企业大亨与政府关系紧张。2016年,他因Sports Direct在什尔布鲁克仓库对工人待遇问题接受议员质询。他最近告诉《金融时报》,他曾拒绝改革英国党的捐款请求,理由是他“反对政治”。
阿什利昨日将信发送至唐宁街,并附上紧急会面邀请。他表示尚未收到回复。
www.ft.com / subscribenow 电话:0800 028 1407
获取最新资讯请访问 www.ft.
© 金融时报有限公司 2026 期号:42,341 ★
印刷地点:伦敦、利物浦、格拉斯哥、都柏林、法兰克福、米兰、马德里、纽约、芝加哥、旧金山、东京、香港、新加坡、首尔、迪拜
9" 770307 " 176159 "
8月27日 / 前值 / 涨跌幅 ---------- / ----------- / ---------- / -------- 标普500 / 7737.99 / 7675.70 / 0.81 纳斯达克综合指数 / 26424.25 / 26130.20 / 1.13 道琼斯工业平均指数 / 53676.08 / 53463.88 / 0.40 欧洲斯托克50 / 6424.73 / 6470.74 / -0.71 FTSEurofirst 300 / 2602.39 / 2621.97 / -0.75 富时100指数 / 10792.54 / 10878.12 / -0.79 富时全股指数 / 5826.09 / 5866.59 / -0.69 法国CAC40指数 / 8319.87 / 8462.39 / -1.68 德国DAX指数 / 26367.24 / 26285.96 / 0.31 日经225指数 / 66131.98 / 66262.16 / -0.20 恒生指数 / 25565.74 / 25652.97 / -0.34 MSCI世界指数 / 4980.50 / 4982.50 / -0.04 MSCI新兴市场指数 / 1716.80 / 1710.00 / 0.40 MSCI ACWI指数 / 1149.10 / 1148.90 / 0.02
货币对 / 8月27日 / 前值 / 货币对 / 8月27日 / 前值 -------- / --------- / ------ / -------- / --------- / ------ 美元 / 英镑 / 1.165 / 欧元 / 美元 / 0.859 / 0.858 美元 / 英镑 / 1.358 / 1.359 / 英镑 / 美元 / 0.736 英镑 / 0.857 / 0.858 / 欧元 / 英镑 / 1.166 日元 / 美元 / 159.320 / 159.370 / 日元 / 欧元 / 185.544 / 185.722 日元 / 英镑 / 216.396 / 216.568 / 英镑指数 / 85.805 / 85.96 瑞士法郎 / 英镑 / 0.936 / 0.939 / 瑞士法郎 / 英镑 / 1.092 / 1.095
8月27日 / 前值 / 涨跌幅 ---------- / ----------- / ---------- / -------- 比特币 / 80383.50 / 78047.00 / 2.99 以太坊 / 2522.87 / 2451.38 / 2.92
WTI原油 / 80.88 / 80.85 / 0.04 布伦特原油 / 88.93 / 88.36 / 0.65 黄金 / 4610.02 / 4595.42 / 0.32
期限 / 8月27日 / 前值 / 涨跌幅 ------ / --------- / ------ / -------- 美国2年期 / 4.20 / 4.22 / -0.02 美国10年期 / 4.65 / 4.66 / -0.01 美国30年期 / 5.18 / 5.19 / -0.01 英国2年期 / 4.34 / 0.00 英国10年期 / 5.03 / 0.00 英国30年期 / 5.76 / 5.77 / -0.01 日本2年期 / 1.67 / 0.00 日本10年期 / 2.87 / 0.00 日本30年期 / 4.05 / 0.00 德国2年期 / 2.85 / 2.83 / 0.02 德国10年期 / 3.25 / 3.23 / 0.02 德国30年期 / 3.75 / 3.73 / 0.02
价格为当期最新数据 数据由洲际交易所(ICE)提供 www.ice.
我们助力企业打造引人注目的价值主张,在您与受众之间建立更紧密的连接。
如需更好连接,请与我们连接:connect@heavenlygroup.
HEAVENLY
Unemployment
无业、无学、无职业培训的青年人数为13年来第二高
克里斯·史密斯 — 公共政策编辑
据昨日官方数据显示,今年4月至6月,16岁至24岁无业、无学、无职业培训(Neet)的青年人数降至981,000人,低于年初1,010,000人的水平。
作为就业与养老金大臣,帕特·麦克法登誓言要为青年人增加就业与培训机会,他说这些数字“过高”,并造成“人道成本”与“国家代价”。
政府委托前内阁大臣艾伦·米尔本撰写的一份报告预计将呼吁全面改革福利制度,以鼓励青年就业。去年,工党议员的强烈反对迫使时任首相基尔·斯塔默放弃改革努力。
米尔本昨日表示,Neet数据是“国家的伤疤”,英国正在“制造失落的一代”。
米尔本的完整审查报告原定于下月公布,但因首相安迪·伯纳姆试图避免福利改革争议在其首次担任工党领袖大会上喧宾夺主,现已推迟至10月中旬。
麦克法登昨日对BBC表示,应对Neet近期上升的问题应成为“政府乃至整个国家的共同事业”,并呼吁雇主承担更多责任。
麦克法登周三在同一职位上曾为斯塔默效力,他指出福利制度存在“设计缺陷”,暗示患病被停职者应为就业做更多准备。
他表示,现行制度“过于简单地将人们划分为‘适合工作’与‘不适合工作’,而当他们不适合工作时,便不提供任何支持或条件。‘我认为这种区分在现行制度下过于绝对。’”
伯纳姆上月决定留任麦克法登,尽管其他效忠斯塔默的部长被大幅裁减,此举被广泛解读为其推进福利改革的信号。
Neet比例在2011年金融危机后失业率上升时达到16.9%,2021年降至9.7%。此后,该比例回升至13%,高于欧盟平均水平。智库“工作基金会”主任本·哈里森表示,英国国家统计局(ONS)的最新数据显示“解决青年就业危机并无捷径”。
“虽然无业、无学、无职业培训的青年人数刚刚跌破100万,但若认为这是转折点将是错误的,因该数字比一年前高出30,000人,”他补充道。
尽管失业曾是Neet比例上升的主要原因,但长期患病现已成为近期增长的关键驱动因素。约60%的Neet青年从未有过工作。
青年就业慈善组织“Impetus”首席执行官苏珊娜·哈迪曼表示,若不采取行动,无业青年给纳税人的代价将持续上升。她表示:“我们估计,每位成为Neet的青年人在一生中平均为国家造成24.4 万英镑的损失,包括税收损失和更高的福利、NHS及刑事司法成本。”
科技。安全

该项目受家暴受害者启发,可监测生命体征并向当局报警
劳伦斯·弗莱彻 —— 伦敦报道
一位在伦敦金融城工作14年的对冲基金经理正在开发一种利用AI保护被视为家庭暴力高风险的妇女和儿童的手环,该发明旨在为不堪重负的社会服务部门提供支持。
Irene Perdomo,一名拥有14年交易经验的交易员,一直在共同出资打造一款“SOS手环”,并希望免费将其提供给政府或地方当局。
这款目前处于原型阶段的手环设计用于监测被社会服务部门认定为家暴风险的儿童或妇女的生命体征。它会记录并转录可能显示佩戴者处于危险中的互动内容,并在必要时向当局报警。
佩尔多莫在五年前开始研发这款手环,这一举动源于她阅读了英国6岁男童亚瑟·拉宾乔-休斯(Arthur Labinjo-Hughes)和美国7岁男童阿德里安·琼斯(Adrian Jones)的死亡案件细节后的感受。
“我将两者结合起来——最终感到非常沮丧,”现年49岁的乌拉圭裔佩尔多莫表示。她正与一群伦敦金融城的金融家共同开发这款手环。“我向他们(拉宾乔-休斯和琼斯)承诺,我会坚持做下去,直到生命最后一刻。”
拉宾乔-休斯在2020年新冠疫情期间被其继母和父亲虐待致死。他们让他整天独自在家中门厅立正,并给他喂食过量食盐,导致其血液中的钠含量高到医院设备无法测量。在他死亡时,其身上发现了130处淤伤。
其继母被判谋杀罪,其父亲被判误杀罪,且其父亲曾研究过穴位以试图造成最大疼痛,法官补充道,他们“以折磨[拉宾乔-休斯]为乐”。
在美国,7岁男童阿德里安·琼斯曾被其父亲和继母殴打并遭受大量酷刑,最终在2015年被饿死并喂食给猪。一名侦探将此案描述为其职业生涯中见过的最恶劣案件。
2022年英国对拉宾乔-休斯和16个月大的斯塔·霍布森(Star Hobson,同样在2020年死亡前为当局所知)的谋杀案进行的全国性审查发现,英国儿童保护工作存在“裂痕”。“多机构保护机制”在“并非所有地区都适用”,且“儿童保护实践中存在过多不一致和模糊性”。
佩尔多莫的手环通过监测佩戴者的体温、脉搏、血氧和血压来工作。如果发现异常,会触发音频录制,并由AI分析内容和情绪,以识别佩戴者可能面临的威胁迹象。
如果检测到潜在威胁,它将发送音频记录、转录文本以及佩戴者位置至儿童保护机构。
佩戴者可按下SOS按钮向社会服务部门报警,手环还可设置定期录音。该设备设计为防篡改,若有人试图摘下,将发送警报。
佩尔多莫同时在伦敦帝国理工学院担任数学与金融客座讲师,目前正与伦敦两个地方议会就该手环在家庭和非家庭暴力情境中的潜在应用进行商谈。
她还一直在联系政治家、社会服务机构和慈善组织,而帝国理工学院的计算机学系也已同意进一步对这种手环进行数据分析。
“我们不会从中赚取一分钱……我们除了拯救生命别无他求。”
曼彻斯特大学犯罪学教授大卫·盖德表示,技术可能在儿童保护中发挥作用。但他同时警告称存在风险,例如社会服务机构可能认为给儿童佩戴标签就完成了工作,以及儿童在学校因佩戴此类手环可能面临的污名。
他说道:“必须充分预见到这些意想不到的后果。”
这种手环的开发正值一场推动利用近期快速发展的AI与可穿戴技术造福社会或保护弱势群体的运动兴起之际。
已有先例证明可穿戴监测技术可与法院命令结合使用。
例如,Scram持续酒精监测手环佩戴在脚踝上,每30分钟检测一次汗液以判断佩戴者是否饮酒。在美国、英格兰与威尔士、荷兰、新西兰和澳大利亚均有使用,例如作为法院命令的结果,或由希望获得儿童监护权的人自愿佩戴以证明其戒酒。
该手环电池续航时间可达90天,且如有需要,训练有素的团队能够在法庭上提供数据支持。
帕多莫此前与莱昂纳多·马罗尼共同管理过一家名为Devet Capital的对冲基金,后者也是支持该手环开发团队的一员。
该手环的软件由乌拉圭的阿尔多·马扎编写,他此前曾在为美国医疗保险公司蓝十字蓝盾工作;而手环原型则在中国制造。
目前仍存在一些问题,包括电池续航时间仅为两天半,尽管帕多莫有信心将其提升至一周。
帕多莫拒绝透露她迄今为止在手环上投资了多少,仅表示她已投入“相当数额”的资金和时间。
“我们不会从中赚取一分钱,”她谈及自己和其他受托人时说,“实际上,我们已从自己的口袋里掏钱。我们除了拯救生命别无他求。”
数字安全
卡纳·伊纳加基、基兰·史密斯
上周末对三大机场的网络攻击导致8.7百万客户的数据被访问,这是近年来该国最大规模的数据泄露事件之一。
曼彻斯特机场集团(MAG)昨日表示,客户的电子邮件地址、电话号码、车辆登记信息和邮政编码在曼彻斯特、伦敦斯坦斯特德和东米德兰兹机场的WiFi注册和停车预订过程中被窃取。银行或支付信息未被泄露。
MAG去年三个机场共服务6600万名乘客。该集团表示在周二发现黑客攻击后"立即控制了风险"。"在任何时候,乘客安全或航空安全都未受到损害,"该集团称。
对该国最大机场集团的黑客攻击发生在英国多家大型企业接连遭受网络攻击之后,包括玛莎百货、捷豹路虎和合作集团。
重要基础设施的脆弱性也在周日被曝光,黑客(据信隶属于伊朗政权)迫使一家小型天然气工厂离线。
虽然被访问的客户信息范围有限,但涉及8.7百万客户的MAG数据泄露规模在近年来仍属最大之一。
索福斯反威胁小组(Sophos Counter Threat Unit)威胁情报主管拉斐·皮林表示,此类攻击"最常见的是勒索软件攻击,网络犯罪分子窃取数据并提出经济要求以阻止公开数据"。
他补充道:"目前,负责的团体可能正在与MAG进行谈判,如果赎金未支付,我们预计未来几天将看到他们公布所窃取数据的指标。"
MAG向《金融时报》表示未支付赎金,并拒绝进一步置评。英国国家网络安全中心表示正"与曼彻斯特机场集团协同应对网络事件"。英国政府通信总部(GCHQ)信号情报分支机构负责人理查德·霍恩去年曾警告称,企业需要加强防范网络攻击。
2023年初,零售商JD Sports表示其成为网络攻击受害者,导致1000万客户数据泄露。
两年前,选举委员会(监管机构)遭遇网络事件,4000万选民数据被访问。
2020年,零售商Dixons Carphone(现为Currys)因泄露超过1400万消费者个人数据被英国信息专员办公室罚款50 万英镑。
MAG表示此次事件未对运营造成干扰,并补充道:"机场运营未受影响,客户停车服务继续正常运行。"
阿利斯泰尔·格雷、朱莉·斯坦伯格
为替换所在楼宇中收费过高或响应迟缓的管理公司而奋战的公寓业主,在英国最高法院赢得一项判决,该判决剥夺了业主可用以阻挠业主主导接管的强大工具。
最高法院昨日作出有利于伦敦一组租赁权持有人的裁决,这些业主因一项细微技术性问题而被阻止接管其楼宇的管理权。
房产律师表示,这一开创性判决推翻了上诉法院此前的裁定,有望为对现有管理方式不满的业主发起更多“管理权”接管行动提供便利。
该案是围绕饱受诟病的封建时代“租赁权”制度(影响英格兰和威尔士大多数公寓)的更广泛战场的一部分。该制度因令公寓业主面临高额服务费和劣质维修饱受批评。
“管理权”制度于2003年引入,允许租赁权持有人撤换业主聘用的管理公司,但律师表示,该流程对公寓业主而言可能成本高昂且繁琐。
在最高法院审理的案件中,伦敦西区克雷斯塔宫(Cresta Court)的业主试图接管管理权,但因未向一位新近购房的业主发送“参与邀请”文件而受阻。该业主虽支持接管,但业主方律师主张,因错过文件导致整个流程在法律上无效。
其律师辩称,业主接管楼宇管理相当于强制转让财产权,因此需严格遵守程序。
财产仲裁庭最初支持租赁权持有人,但上诉法院去年却裁定业主的“管理权”主张无效。
五名最高法院法官昨日推翻了上述裁决,裁定细微技术性问题不应令接管尝试无效。
“我们无法假设《管理权》计划意在对每一项程序违规施以无情的制裁,即宣告索赔通知无效,”法官在判决摘要中表示。
德文希律师事务所合伙人马克·福克斯克罗夫特表示,上诉法院的裁决“为房东创造了一种强大工具”,可令其无效化业主接管楼宇管理的尝试。
他说:“房东对‘管理权’索赔的技术性挑战,尤其是在大型楼宇中,一直在增加。最高法院的这一明确裁决无疑将令此类挑战在未来变得更加不太可能。”
“免租赁权”运动组织创始人哈里·斯科芬表示:“最高法院通过支持被困租赁权持有人行使法定‘管理权’,为常识伸张正义,使他们得以夺回对住所、金钱和生活的正当控制权。”
应用在截至6月的年度内下降五分之一,小型船只抵达减少四分之一
艾米·博雷特、大卫·谢泼德
英国庇护申请人数在2026年6月结束的年度内下降五分之一,同时第二季度入住酒店的庇护者人数降至历史低点。
截至2026年6月的年度内,近86,000人在英国申请庇护,相比前12个月下降21%,反映出通过英吉利海峡小型船只抵达英国的人数减少近四分之一。
昨天发布的英国内政部数据显示,在内政大臣去年推出一系列移民改革措施后,包括提议将获得永久居留权所需的默认居住时间延长一倍,以及收紧难民规则。
近年来,移民问题已跃升为政治议程的核心议题,选民对小型船只横渡的担忧助推了奈杰尔·法拉奇的反移民政党改革英国党在民调中的支持率。
安迪·伯纳姆在今年7月接替基尔·斯塔默出任首相,尽管工党左翼部分反对其收紧移民政策的主张,仍保留了沙巴娜·马哈茂德为内政大臣。
尽管部分改革已生效,专家指出,欧洲庇护申请者整体减少是英国庇护申请下降的关键驱动因素。
然而,政府在本届议会任期结束前实现关闭庇护酒店目标方面取得进展,第二季度末共有16,021人入住酒店,创历史新低。
该数据相比第一季度末下降23%。
过去18个月,全国多家庇护酒店成为反移民抗议的焦点,而伯纳姆也表示,更富裕地区应接收更多庇护者。超过1,000名庇护者已被迁至闲置的国防部场地,包括埃塞克斯的RAF韦瑟斯菲尔德和肯特的内皮尔兵营。但该政策常面临地方反对。
昨天的数据显示,在2025-26财年,整个庇护系统的年度成本降至44亿英镑,同比下降8%,为三年来最低。
马哈茂德表示:“本届政府正在恢复对边境的控制,并让移民系统更加公平。小型船只抵达人数现已下降,但我们并未因此自满,仍需做更多工作。因此,我已加强在法国海滩及海外的执法力度,并推出新立法,以打击通过不安全和非法路线吸引人们前来英国的拉动因素。”
牛津大学移民观察站主任马德琳·森普申表示,这些数据反映的是在签证抵达及其他非正规入境路线后寻求庇护的人数减少,而不仅仅是小型船只抵达人数的下降。
她说:“近期政策可能为此次下降做出了贡献,包括对大学的限制——这些大学的学生随后申请庇护。”
“其他因素也可能发挥作用,例如进入欧盟的非正规抵达人数减少,以及叙利亚政权更迭后赴英的叙利亚人减少。”
Citizenship applications in year ending June at a new high Citizenship applications, 12-month rolling total (000)
Asylum seekers housed in hotels fall to record low People in receipt of asylum support housed in hotels (000)
Source: Home Office
People board a boat off the coast of France seeking to cross the Channel in July; Shabana Mahmood, below — Gareth Fuller / PA; Bianca De Marchi
英国公民申请人数在截至2026年6月的年度内达到315,224人,创历史新高。
去年,英国政府公布计划,旨在收紧移民永久定居门槛,作为其所谓“50年来最大规模移民模式改革”的一部分。
移民观察站研究员努妮·约根森表示,公民申请人数增长部分反映了非欧盟移民的增长,同时也体现了自2021年以来选择成为英国公民的非欧盟移民比例有所上升。
她表示,最近欧盟公民中出现了“格外急剧”的增长,表明人们渴望成为英国公民的意愿出现了更为突然的变化。
在截至6月的年度内,英国共发放近235,000份工作签证,同比下降五分之一。
“近期政策可能导致这一下降,包括对大学的限制”

其中,主申请人获发的医疗和护理工作者签证下降了65%,技术工人签证下降了30%。
技术移民数量的减少可能加剧伯纳姆政府在其首个预算案(定于10月28日公布)面临的压力。预算责任办公室作为监管机构,预计将在该财政事件中更新其预测,反映对未来净移民规模的更低假设。
主申请人获发的学生签证也出现下降,同比减少12%,而发放给受抚养人的签证数量则保持稳定。
公共财政
英国税务海关总署
根据昨日发布的数据,2024-25财年资本利得税收入创下历史新高,此前时任财政大臣雷切尔·里夫斯在首次预算案中决定上调税率。
英国税务海关总署(HMRC)报告称,2024-25财年资本利得税收入为242亿英镑,较前一年增长89%,为1987年以来最高年度资本利得税收入。
HMRC表示,共有584,000人缴纳了资本利得税,较前一年增长45%,凸显英国工党政府为填补公共财政缺口而提高税率的举措效果。
里夫斯在2024年预算案中将资本利得税税率上调至18%至32%,此前税率为10%至28%。保守党政府在2023-24财年削减了免税额,并在2024-25财年将其减半至£1。
HMRC表示,资本利得税税率上调、免税额连续年度削减以及自2025年4月起企业资产处置税率上升,均为税收收入创纪录做出了贡献。
资本利得税对出售第二套住房、股票和企业等资产所产生的利润征税。HMRC表示,总计报告的资本利得为1270亿英镑,较前一年增长82%。
HMRC首次报告了加密货币投资者的资本利得税收入,17,600名加密货币持有者共缴纳13.8亿英镑,其中大部分年龄在35至44岁之间。共有240人报告了每人至少£1mn的加密资产收益。
HMRC一直在严厉打击加密货币逃税行为,据《金融时报》上月报道,已从数字资产逃税者处追回超过£8mn。
HMRC表示,45%的资本利得税来自收益超过£5mn的纳税人群体,该群体占所有资本利得税纳税人的比例不足1%。
科尔比敦促各国“加快步伐”,评估能力状况被形容为“满目红色”
亨利·福伊 — 布鲁塞尔
美国已就北约盟国军事能力缺口问题向其发出斥责,这些缺口在北约的彩色评估体系中被形容为“满目红色”。此举正值特朗普政府权衡如何迅速从欧洲大陆撤出美国武器和部队之际。
埃尔布里奇·科尔比昨日在布鲁塞尔与北约大使会晤,讨论欧洲防务投资问题,此次会议是为一项将于2035年12月结束的美国在欧洲军事部署审查而召开。他在会后对部分欧洲盟国表示,需加快采购美方长期提供的关键常规武器系统。
科尔比在会后表示,美国希望看到欧洲盟国“付出重大努力加快步伐”,并构建“一个北约力量模式,使欧洲能够长期处于能够领导自身防务的地位”。
他表示:“我们希望看到英国等国采取更多行动”,同时赞扬德国、波兰和荷兰在增加支出方面的努力。
一位参与此次讨论的北约外交官表示,北约的国家评估体系将特定所需能力标记为绿色、琥珀色或红色,“情况不容乐观……满目红色”。另有两位外交官证实,会谈涉及能力短板问题,并要求多国盟友增加支出。
欧洲各国政府对五角大楼的审查如何实施仍存疑虑。但官员们担心,华盛顿可能利用审查结果惩罚未能明显提升支出和能力的国家,以此决定从欧洲撤出哪些美国武器和部队。
据三位知情人士透露,在昨日闭门会议中,部分欧洲盟国对美国的指责进行了反驳,指出在某些领域他们已达到或超过北约能力目标。这些目标评估各国在冲突中应对盟军响应的预期贡献。
科尔比还提及华盛顿向北约大使发送的一份书面问卷,询问其政府是否限制了美军使用军事基地、是否从美国公司采购武器,以及是否“公开支持”唐纳德·特朗普总统的外交政策。
科尔比补充道:“我们希望直接从盟国政府那里听到书面答复。”
特朗普长期批评北约盟国依赖美国保护却未在自身防务上投入足够资金。科尔比的上司、国防部长皮特·黑格塞思今年6月宣布对美国在欧洲的部队展开为期6个月的审查,旨在终结他所称的部分北约盟国“搭便车”行为。
特朗普已迫使北约领导人同意将防务支出基准提高至2035年GDP的5%,其中3.5%需用于“核心”项目,如武器和部队。据北约计算,32个成员国中有5个预计今年能满足这些要求。
北约秘书长马克·吕特在会前表示,此次审查过程对于确保“更诚实、更公平的责任分担”至关重要——黑格塞思和科尔比将其称为“北约 3.0”。
拉丁美洲外交

左翼巴西领导人在与美国国务卿日益加剧的敌意中转向美国总统寻求支持
杰夫·戴尔、迈克尔·普勒 巴西利亚 艾米·麦金农 — 华盛顿
巴西总统路易斯·伊纳西奥·卢拉·达席尔瓦与美国国务卿马尔科·卢比奥之间的争执已变得如此激烈,以至于这位巴西领导人正在寻求一个“不太可能的”盟友:美国总统唐纳德·特朗普。
随着南美国家为10月份一场势均力敌的总统选举做准备,卢拉与卢比奥互相抛出了异常尖锐的批评。卢比奥指责巴西左翼领导人将“自己的 ego”置于人民之上,而卢拉则称美国最高外交官是一个“沮丧的拉美人”,“仇恨巴西”。
卢拉正试图拉拢美国总统作为盟友,本月他表示将致电特朗普投诉对选举的干预。“他[卢比奥]做的事情与我们和特朗普讨论过的不同,”卢拉说。
两位总统上周进行了一次超过一小时的通话,巴西政府将此次通话描述为“友好且亲切”,并在这次通话中就“维护强劲商业联系的重要性”达成一致。该声明未提及选举。
华盛顿的一些人士表示,卢拉正在与卢比奥制造争端,因为他认为对美国的民族主义反弹将有助于他击败对手——极右翼前总统之子弗拉维奥·博尔索纳罗。一位美国高级官员表示,卢拉“公开煽动、挑衅并邀请和挑起冲突”。
但对巴西政府而言,这场争端表明在特朗普第二任期内,国务院已变得更加公开意识形态化,更加强调支持拉丁美洲的右翼盟友。
据一位巴西高级官员称,存在“巴西极右翼与[美国]国务院中的极右翼协调一致的议程”。
在特朗普第一任期内,许多国家的外交官会请国务院劝说总统放弃其更激进的提议。而在特朗普第二任期,巴西认为总统可能成为一个缓和影响力,尽管他们也意识到他仍在设定政策的大方向。
“特朗普是他们[美国政府]中最好的一个,他是最认真与我交谈的人,”卢拉上周表示。“我们都是国家元首,两个八十多岁的男人。”
美国国务院表示将尊重“巴西人民选择的任何政府”,并称其与巴西历届政府(无论左右翼)都保持着“非常成功的关系”。
作为南美最大经济体和该大陆为数不多的左翼政府之一,巴西选举的利害关系重大。自去年以来,巴西利亚与华盛顿一直不和,当时特朗普对巴西输美商品征收50%的关税——使其成为白宫贸易政策影响最严重的国家之一。
从那以后,尽管存在贸易紧张局势,卢拉还是成功地与美国总统建立了个人关系。“我们有着极好的化学反应,”特朗普在去年联合国大会期间与卢拉简短会面后如是说。
巴西得到了商界的帮助,特别是JBS(全球最大肉类生产商)股东之一若泽利·巴蒂斯塔——其美国家禽集团Pilgrim's Pride是特朗普第二任期就职委员会最大的企业捐助者。
在巴西及其在美利益相关企业的游说下,特朗普政府最终大幅缩减了许多关税。
巴西外交官表示,伊朗战争爆发之初,政治风向发生了转变。他们认为,这场战争分散了白宫的注意力,为美国国务院采取主动提供了更多空间。自此之后,他们声称,美国国务院曾试图偏袒博尔索纳罗家族。
今年3月,巴西在发现美国国务院高级官员达伦·比阿蒂计划会见因在2022年败选后密谋政变而被软禁的前总统雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗后,撤销了其签证。
当美国在7月对该国实施新一轮25%的关税时,鲁比奥表示,卢拉的政策“对美国人和巴西人都不利”。
上个月,巴西指控另外两名美国国务院官员试图质疑该国电子投票系统的完整性——这与博尔索纳罗家族散布的毫无根据的说法如出一辉。
“这一情况与博尔索纳罗兄弟的声明相吻合,暗示存在协调散布虚假信息的行为,”一位巴西官员表示。
与巴西发生冲突的一些美国国务院官员还参与了该政府有时对欧洲采取的强硬立场。据《华盛顿邮报》报道,比阿蒂曾会见德国极右翼政党“德国另类选择党”的成员。上个月被禁止入境巴西的塞缪尔·萨姆森曾试图将外国援助资金重新用于在英国和欧洲资助与“Maga”相关的团体。
这位美国官员坚称,该政府并非试图干预巴西大选。两名国务院官员计划访问巴西讨论选举完整性的行程原本是为了进行“完全例行的对话……但巴西的反应却显得古怪”。
然而,美国国务院并未掩饰其对卢拉政府的负面看法。
今年6月,鲁比奥在国会表示,拉丁美洲由一个“友好国家联盟”主导,这些国家与美国密切合作,但例外情况包括古巴、尼加拉瓜、委内瑞拉——这些都是威权政权——以及“当然还有巴西”。
“(卢拉)始终采取激进的左翼立场,与美国利益相悖,”鲁比奥表示。
瓦加斯基金会大学外交政策专家马蒂亚斯·斯佩克托表示,两国“注定会发生冲突”,因为巴西现在对美国经济的依赖程度大幅降低——其出口的约三分之一流向中国,而流向美国的仅占11%。
“(该政府)会更希望博尔索纳罗担任总统吗?那当然,”他说,“但马可·鲁比奥不会牺牲两国关系。”
劳拉·迪布瓦、亨利·福伊 布鲁塞尔报道
包括瑞典、荷兰、西班牙和波兰在内的欧盟国家正敦促布鲁塞尔重启动用冻结在欧盟境内的俄罗斯主权资产(超过€2000亿)为乌克兰战争提供资金的努力,以应对基辅面临新一轮资金危机的担忧。
去年冬季,由于多数资产存放在比利时的方案受阻,利用超过€2000亿俄罗斯央行资产为乌克兰提供资金的计划宣告破产。
但据四名知情人士透露,由多国联合致函欧盟委员会的信件呼吁欧盟行政机构重启相关工作,并寻求在其他法律和技术框架下推进方案,以解决比利时的否决问题。
瑞典外交大臣玛丽亚·马尔默·斯滕内加德表示:“现在是重新讨论如何进一步利用俄罗斯冻结资产造福乌克兰及我们自身的时候了。这是确保乌克兰能够自卫并保护整个欧洲的公平且明智之举。”
信件指出:“通过动用冻结资产,欧盟能够确保俄罗斯为其在乌克兰造成的破坏承担责任,同时减轻本国纳税人的负担。”
信件还表示:“因此,我们建议邀请欧盟委员会的技术专家探索……新的选项,如何利用冻结资产造福乌克兰,确保风险由所有欧盟成员国共同承担,且无一成员国承担过度负担。”
信件呼吁在下周爱尔兰举行的欧盟外长会议上讨论该议题。
乌克兰长期要求欧盟动用制裁冻结的俄罗斯资产,以帮助资助其防务。目前,存放于总部位于布鲁塞尔的欧洲清算中心(Euroclear)的资产所产生的收益已被用于为2024年达成的一笔最高€500亿贷款提供资金。
在基辅遭受俄罗斯导弹夜间轰炸之际,欧盟各国首都担忧乌克兰需要额外资金,超出去年12月匆忙筹集的€900亿贷款。斯滕内加德表示:“这笔€900亿贷款体现了欧盟支持乌克兰的承诺,但显然远远不够。”
一位知情人士表示:“我们需要确保这不仅仅是一两个成员国承担责任。”
去年,比利时以可能面临俄罗斯法律挑战并需承担资产偿还责任为由,否决了该计划。
克里姆林宫发言人德米特里·佩斯科夫昨日表示,扣押俄罗斯资产“将是非法的,并将产生法律后果”。他称:“俄罗斯将动用一切法律手段维护自身利益,并对做出和实施此类决定的各方提起法律诉讼。”
欧洲清算中心(Euroclear)拒绝置评。

- 在世界各地随时随地获取值得信赖的全球新闻,请访问 ft.com 或下载《金融时报》应用
拉特科·姆拉迪奇 军事指挥官 1942-2026

拉特科·姆拉迪奇,这位因1995年斯雷布雷尼察大屠杀被定罪犯有种族灭绝罪的波斯尼亚塞尔维亚军事指挥官,昨日在荷兰监狱中去世,享年84岁。
姆拉迪奇在1992-1995年波斯尼亚战争后潜逃16年,于2011年被捕并被移交前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭。2017年,他因犯有种族灭绝罪、危害人类罪及战争法或战争惯例违反罪被判处无期徒刑。
姆拉迪奇的定罪确认了其在20世纪后期最臭名昭著的战犯之列。他毫无悔意,将法庭斥为"撒旦般的存在",并在一次向前来作证的斯雷布雷尼察幸存者(她失去了丈夫、儿子和兄弟)做出割喉手势。
1995年7月,超过7,000名波斯尼亚克人(或称波斯尼亚穆斯林)男子和男孩在斯雷布雷尼察被屠杀,这是波斯尼亚战争中众多暴行之一,该战争共造成约10万人死亡。这成为国际失败的代名词,因为该飞地当时处于联合国保护之下。联合国或西方政府均未采取措施阻止屠杀。
在姆拉迪奇的部队攻陷飞地后,他对一群惊恐的、手无寸铁的波斯尼亚克平民说道:"不会有人受到伤害。你们无需害怕。"
随后,男子和青少年男孩被与妇女分离并分批屠杀数日。在波斯尼亚塞尔维亚电视台拍摄的画面中,姆拉迪奇告诉其士兵,现在是时候为19世纪初该地区塞尔维亚人遭受奥斯曼土耳其袭击报仇了。
姆拉迪奇于1942年3月12日出生于波斯尼亚卡利诺维克市,当时该市由纳粹扶植的克罗地亚傀儡政权控制。他几乎不认识自己的父亲,后者是一名共产主义游击队员,在姆拉迪奇还是婴儿时就被克罗地亚军队杀害。在20世纪90年代,波斯尼亚塞尔维亚部队残酷地将卡利诺维克的波斯尼亚克人清洗一空。许多当地塞尔维亚人视姆拉迪奇为英雄,战后还有一些人帮助他躲避追捕。
姆拉迪奇在20世纪60年代于南斯拉夫军事学院接受训练,并稳步晋升至塞尔维亚人主导的军官阶层。1991年,随着南斯拉夫国家开始分裂,姆拉迪奇接管了克罗地亚塞尔维亚人分裂政权首都克宁的一支军团。一年后,波斯尼亚战争爆发,姆拉迪奇被任命为波斯尼亚塞尔维亚部队指挥官。
在此期间,他指挥了萨拉热窝围城战,超过10,000名平民在围城中丧生。战争罪法庭因其在围城中的角色对其定罪,围城持续近四年,比纳粹对列宁格勒的围城时间更长。
姆拉迪奇与波斯尼亚塞尔维亚政治领导人拉多万·卡拉季奇及塞尔维亚总统斯洛博丹·米洛舍维奇共同发动战役。米洛舍维奇于2006年在羁押期间去世,未等到法庭对他作出判决。卡拉季奇于2016年因战争罪被定罪,判处40年监禁。他目前在英国监狱服刑。
姆拉迪奇持有极端塞尔维亚民族主义观点,认为南斯拉夫的解体为重新划分地图提供了机会。波斯尼亚克人和波斯尼亚克罗地亚人应通过恐怖和胁迫手段被驱逐出波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的大部分地区。对某些人而言,目标是建立一个"大塞尔维亚国家",将塞尔维亚(包括科索沃)与波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那及克罗地亚的塞尔维亚控制区连接起来。
武装保镖在拉特科·姆拉迪奇潜逃期间保护了他,他还得到了塞尔维亚军方和安全部门同情者的帮助。他曾偶尔出现在一些活动中,例如1997年在贝尔格莱德一家酒店为儿子达尔科举办的婚礼招待会。他与妻子博西利卡的另一个孩子是女儿安娜,她于1994年在他父亲的枪支自杀身亡,享年23岁。
2011年5月,塞尔维亚警方在贝尔格莱德以北的一处农场逮捕了姆拉迪奇,发现他因年老而身体虚弱、健康状况不佳,但仍然毫无悔意。他在海牙的听证会上表示:“我是拉特科·姆拉迪奇将军。全世界都知道我是谁。我在这里是为了捍卫我的国家和人民,而不是拉特科·姆拉迪奇。”
托尼·巴伯
国际新闻
劳拉·杜波依斯(布鲁塞尔报道)
四名仍在欧洲运营的俄罗斯主要银行高管利用2022年欧盟制裁引发的市场混乱,在个人账户上赚取数百万。
当莫斯科因西方为支持乌克兰而实施的制裁而陷入困境时,俄罗斯国有能源巨头俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司(Gazprom)的多只外币债券在欧洲被冻结,价格暴跌。为支持俄罗斯投资者和借款人,普京总统下令这些债券可在俄罗斯以全价兑换为新债券。
俄罗斯天然气工业银行卢森堡分行的高级银行家们发现了机会。据《金融时报》看到的文件显示,他们从雇主处获得数百万欧元的个人贷款,并开始大肆采购这些折价债券,将其兑换为卢布等价全值债券。
他们进行了超过50笔交易,可能获利超过€9mn,据《金融时报》基于文件的计算。
俄罗斯天然气工业银行卢森堡分行是欧洲国家向俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司支付款项的主要渠道,该行由俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司创立,但为独立公司。
据律师、金融专家及欧盟官员向《金融时报》透露,这些交易引发了四名银行家是否可能规避欧盟制裁并使用内幕信息的质疑。
据俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司公告,这些债券兑换涉及一家受欧盟制裁的俄罗斯实体——国家结算存管处。“这听起来像是规避制裁”,一位接触调查结果但无权公开发言的欧盟官员表示,“此事需要在卢森堡接受刑事调查。”
四名董事定期协调行动,在同一天购买相同数量的同一债券,通常是在债券被宣布为合格前
用于替换在俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司网站上的内容。知情人士表示,人们并不广泛了解哪些债券将被用于交换以及交换时间,因为俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司仅提前极短时间(约两周)通知并给出了极短的交换窗口。
这些发现令卢森堡宽松的金融监管再受审视。据审计报告,卢森堡监管机构在接到举报后检查了这些交易,但仅要求该银行更新员工手册。
卢森堡天然气工业银行否认不当行为,对《金融时报》表示其“严格”遵守了“欧盟及卢森堡大公国的法律、规则和法规”。该银行称,“无论是在总体上还是针对据称由相关个人以个人身份进行的交易,均未参与违反欧盟制裁的行为”。
德米特里·德卡奇(Dmitry Derkatch),卢森堡天然气工业银行前董事,也是交易的发起者,亦强烈否认不当行为,并表示监管机构“没有发现重大不当行为”。
俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司曾向欧洲大片地区供应天然气,在2022年2月俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰后,其免受欧盟针对俄罗斯的全面制裁。
但其外币债券价格仍暴跌,部分债券交易价格仅为初始价值的一半,因西方对俄罗斯金融系统关键节点的制裁令俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司难以向债权人支付利息。
这些债券实际上已无法流通。
卢森堡天然气工业银行的内部沟通显示,俄罗斯证券交易的结算问题迅速出现。“交易结算[很可能]无法完成,资金 / 证券将被冻结,”一封3月份的内部邮件写道。
克里姆林宫的解决方案是允许投资者将其欧洲债券替换为俄罗斯新发行的债券,以卢布交易且按原始价值计价。卡内基俄罗斯欧亚中心的亚历山德拉·普罗科片科(Alexandra Prokopenko)表示,对这些债券的需求很高,且价格差距“切实且显著”。
西方金融参与者高度怀疑。一位熟悉卢森堡中央证券登记结算公司(Clearstream)的人士表示:“这种整体环境确实为滥用行为创造了机会。”
该计划引起了德卡奇的注意,他于2022年6月前往莫斯科。返回后,他开设了一个卢森堡天然气工业银行的私人账户——尽管该银行内部政策不向员工提供个人账户——并从该银行莫斯科办事处获得了个人贷款。
普京于2022年7月5日签署法令启动交换计划,九天后,德卡奇开始购买俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司债券。
据《金融时报》看到的文件,他最初以约€65,000购买了一只2024年到期的债券——低于其€150,000面值的一半。该债券于12月被替换,若德卡奇以全价在俄罗斯市场出售,可能获利约€85,000。
德卡奇购买该债券时,俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司尚未公开详细说明哪些证券将被交换或交换时间——其网站直到11月才宣布替换德卡奇债券的计划。
首轮交换——针对与德卡奇购买的债券不同的债券——于2024年9月在其网站上宣布,俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司表示将公布未来其他俄罗斯境外外币债券的计划。
俄罗斯央行前副行长、伦敦Nest经济中心主任谢尔盖·亚历山德拉申科(Sergey Aleksashenko)表示,在普京法令签署后不久购买债券的“风险不确定性”很大,尤其是对于为交易贷款并支付利息的人而言。
The timing of Derkatch's purchase suggested that “maybe . . . he was aware or he had some connections with the top management in Moscow who confirmed that [a specific bond] will be part of the transaction”, Aleksashenko said.
Derkatch told the Financial Times that “the absence of any material findings by the Luxembourg banking regulator following a very detailed inquiry . . . shall conclusively settle that there was nothing unlawful in connection with this matter”.
He said he could not comment further because he did not have access to the bank's "detailed internal information".
In September, the other three members of the Luxembourg outpost's management board also began buying the discounted bonds: Sergey Nekrasov, Sergey Belousov and Pavel Bolshakov.
The four directors appeared to be “hunting the market” for the right bonds, which were difficult to find, said one person familiar with the trades. While they did not participate in every replacement round in 2022, they bought four specific bonds that were all replaced by the end of the year. The purchases were often made shortly before Gazprom announced on its website that the bond in question would be replaced.
For example, the four managers bought a dollar-denominated bond beginning in late September and through October. Its replacement was announced on the Gazprom website on October 7, and the swap window ended on October 24. The bond had been trading at about 50 per cent in Europe, but its Russian replacement rose to 120 per cent in December.
It would have been “impossible” to do the transactions in a short amount of time without prior knowledge of which bonds would be swapped, suggested one person. “You have to find these bonds, they are illiquid, and you have to understand which bank or broker has such bonds,” they said.
It is unclear how much money the four borrowed from Gazprombank Moscow to fund the transactions. But between July and November the four bankers received transfers of more than 1700万欧元 converted from roubles, which they used for dozens of purchases, according to documents seen by the Financial Times.
Their combined potential profit was more than 900万欧元, according to Financial Times calculations based on how much they paid, the bonds' nominal prices and historical exchange rates.
Senior bankers at Gazprombank Luxembourg were aware of the arrangement. In an email to the head of compliance that October, private banking head Dmitry Galkin outlined how the four "received separate personal loans . . . and bought different Eurobonds of Gazprom". He noted their "economic rationale": the price of the rouble replacements "theoretically should be higher" than that of the bonds in Europe.
Gazprom's original 8.625% bond in \$ vs its Russian replacement trading in roubles*
They used Swiss bank Compagnie Bancaire Helvétique as a broker and also routed funds through Cypriot bank Veles International.
Belousov, Bolshakov and Nekrasov were approached for comment by email, and Belousov and Bolshakov were also approached via the website of the company they run together. Gazprom, Gazprombank Moscow, CBH and Veles did not respond to requests for comment.
Gazprom Series 2 8.625% due on Apr 28 2034 (XS0191754729) and its replacement Gazprom 8.63% due on Apr 28 2034 (RU000A105A95) Source: Cbonds
Gazprombank Luxembourg denied having “been engaged in market abuse or otherwise participated in any unlawful conduct”.
The transactions were halted inside the bank following an inquiry at the end of 2022, according to two people familiar with the trades.
Following a tip-off, Luxembourg's financial regulator CSSF inspected the bank in March 2023. But it did not interview some of the people who had information about the transactions, according to two people familiar with the trades. "The CSSF was . . . blind," said another person.
The CSSF found the bank violated its internal rules that did not allow employees to open personal accounts and found that the four directors had not been vetted despite being deemed "high risk", according to an inspection report seen by the FT. But it did not find any other wrongdoing or impose fines.
The CSSF declined to comment.
Luxembourg's finance ministry, which is responsible for enforcing sanctions, declined to comment.

HTSI秋季美容特刊

印第安纳州的心态:中西部是否已对特朗普的政治感到厌倦?

Netflix能否重振《泽西海岸》——以及当地房地产市场?

詹姆斯·里班斯论英国农业的未来

午餐对话《金融时报》:前IMF副总裁吉塔·戈皮纳特
国际
中东
驱逐威胁源于对内塔尼亚胡政策的批评
尼里·齐尔伯 — 特拉维夫 吉姆·皮卡德 — 伦敦 埃米·卡兹明 — 罗马
以色列正在考虑将英国及其他潜在的欧洲官员驱逐出美领导的战后加沙协调中心,作为对本杰明·内塔尼亚胡在巴勒斯坦领土政策批评的报复。
多位知情人士表示,以色列政府近几周讨论了将英国从国际加沙支援中心(IGSC)中驱逐出去,该多国总部设立用于监督美国斡旋的以色列与哈马斯停火协议。一些知情人士称,类似措施也可能针对意大利和德国。
IGSC总部位于以色列南部,由美国军方领导,与以色列国防军及来自50个国家和国际组织的军事和外交官员合作。
以色列本周宣布驱逐荷兰代表,原因是荷兰抵制来自被占领西岸、东耶路撒冷和戈兰高地的以色列产品。
以色列今年还驱逐了西班牙代表,理由是马德里方面存在“过度反以色列偏见”。
英国、德国和意大利与另外20个国家及欧盟委员会上周联合发表公开信,谴责以色列推进E-1定居点项目建设招标的计划,分析人士警告称该项目可能分割约旦河西岸并严重损害巴勒斯坦建国前景。
英国外交大臣埃德·米利班德补充称,“英国不会袖手旁观,接受‘两国方案’的破坏”。以色列外交部长吉迪恩·萨尔回应称,英国不应“教训犹太人民他们可以在自己历史家园的何处居住”。
据两位知情人士透露,任何驱逐更多国际代表的举动可能需要得到特朗普今年设立的“和平委员会”批准,该国际机构负责监督加沙战后过渡与重建。
但第三位知情人士对此提出质疑,并表示以色列拥有全面主权决定谁可进入或留在其领土。和平委员会发言人表示:“我们将继续与以色列方面就维护和加强多边协调进行接触,并加速推进总统对加沙全面和平计划的进展。”
以色列总理办公室和德国官员拒绝置评。
英国官员对被逐出IGSC的可能性态度乐观。一位熟悉情况的人士表示,以色列已对西班牙和荷兰做出了示范,因此英国强硬立场可能招致“报复”是合乎逻辑的预期。
伦敦报道:安德鲁·英格兰;柏林报道:安妮-西尔维娜·沙斯尼
洪水冲破尼泊尔与中国边境附近河岸时,多栋建筑被冲走


来源:行星实验室
疑似冰川崩塌凸显风险,该地区升温速度高于全球平均水平
迈克尔·斯托特 — 新德里 乔·利希 — 北京 安德烈斯·希帕尼 — 加德满都
周三袭击尼泊尔与中国边境附近定居点的巨型暴洪,成为喜马拉雅地区民众面临日益增长风险的残酷提醒。科学家表示,这一山脉对气候变化极为脆弱。
目前尚无法确定洪灾的确切原因,但科学家称,灾前灾后的卫星图像显示,位于西藏附近的朗塘里隆山脉北侧的一大片悬崖崩塌,并带下覆盖其上的冰川一角。
数千万立方米岩石和冰块坠落的威力最初被误认为地震,据估计,其释放的能量足以融化冰川,形成一道巨大的岩石、泥土和水的洪流,沿博特科西河谷奔涌数十英里进入尼泊尔。
这场灾难凸显了冰川和山坡因气候变化日益受到影响所带来的危险。科学家表示,该地区升温速度高于全球平均水平,一些人担忧中国大型水电项目可能正在增加灾害风险。
截至昨晚,已确认超过360人在这次洪灾中丧生,另有1,400多人失踪。
克里斯滕·库克(格勒诺布尔大学地貌学家)昨日分析新鲜卫星图像后表示,朗塘里隆山脉冰川下的一大片悬崖似乎已崩塌。
虽然喜马拉雅高山地区的岩石崩塌并不罕见,但她表示,“此次事件的不同寻常之处,以及为何酿成如此大的灾难,在于其规模极为巨大”。
英国邓迪大学环境科学家西蒙·库克表示:“冰川悬垂末端的下部似乎已脱落,并倾泻约1,300米进入下方山谷。”
苏黎世大学灾害风险研究员西蒙·艾伦表示,从卫星图像可以清楚看到,“一大块岩石和冰已脱落并坠落”,形成“冰-岩崩塌”,引发洪灾。
艾伦表示,冰川与山区永久冻土灾害研究小组的研究人员尚未计算出坠落规模,但根据地震信号,他们估算5000万-1億立方米的碎屑撞击地面。
他说:“规模极为巨大。至少在有记录的历史时期内,这是该地区同类事件中最大的一次。”
现年38岁的吉里·拉尔·布达索基(尼泊尔拉苏瓦县下游居民、卡车司机)表示:“我看到的景象就像水龙卷;我们的房子被抬升数米后倒塌。”
布达索基在洪灾中幸存下来,但头部和手臂受伤,被送往加德满都医院。他正准备哀悼仍然下落不明的妻子和四个孩子。
美国地质调查局最初报告尼泊尔与中国边境附近发生4.4级地震,但随后修正为5.2级山体滑坡,并表示地震能量“由冰川崩塌和碎屑流产生”。
印度科学院(位于班加罗尔)冰川专家阿尼尔·库尔卡尼表示,喜马拉雅冰川正在“极速”退缩。
因为喜马拉雅地区现在正在以远高于全球平均水平的速度变暖,“冰体与岩石之间的永久冻土已经开始弱化,”库尔卡尼表示。
他补充说,2021年印度里希根加河谷也发生了一次类似但规模较小的灾难,当时一大块岩石、积雪和冰从山上坠入山谷,导致200多人丧生。
库尔卡尼表示,2021年的灾难向科学界敲响了警钟,让人们意识到冰川崩塌可能造成的破坏性后果。“而且请记住,山区可能有成千上万这样的悬冰川。因此,如何应对确实是一个棘手的问题,”他说道。
世界银行和亚洲开发银行曾警告称,尼泊尔多变的地形和社会脆弱性使该国尤其容易受到地质和气候相关灾害的影响,以及由冰川湖溃决或暴雨引发的洪水。
“气候变化已对尼泊尔环境产生重大影响……冰川正在融化,降水极端事件的频率正在增加,”两家机构在2021年的一份报告中表示。
库尔卡尼表示,喜马拉雅地区的水电大坝建设和不断增加的开发活动正在提高该地区国家面临冰川崩塌的脆弱性。由此产生的大量水流可能冲垮大坝,并使日益增长的河谷人口面临洪水威胁。
“我们正在经历规模和性质上前所未有的灾害,”他说道。
早期预警系统或许有所帮助,但要发现可能发生崩塌的冰川犹如“大海捞针”。
“它们看起来通常与其他冰川无异,很难预测哪些冰川具有危险性,”他说道。
一些专家对中国在西藏大规模筑坝计划表示担忧,特别是其计划在雅鲁藏布江上修建世界最大水电工程(雅鲁藏布江在印度被称为布拉马普特拉河)。
中国排名第二的领导人——李强总理昨日受习近平主席派遣前往受本周洪水重创的吉隆地区指挥救灾工作——去年出席了该水电工程在西藏东南部的开工仪式。
中国官员已驳斥了外界对这一巨型大坝环境影响或对下游水资源供应潜在影响的担忧。
该巨型大坝的复杂设计涉及在雅鲁藏布江50公里弯道上利用2,000米落差,通过隧道分流河水——这一工程预计将产生大量碎石,并需穿越复杂的地质构造进行钻探。
“由人类活动引发的基础设施开发也可能加剧地震风险,”斯德哥尔摩南亚与印太事务中心主任贾格纳特·潘达表示。
潘达表示,这一新巨型大坝“无论从体量还是规模来看”,都有可能增加地震风险,并可能提高滑坡发生的几率。
“中国理应仔细审查这一项目,在更大的透明度、信息披露和与喜马拉雅国家——特别是印度、尼泊尔等国——的对话下推进,”潘达表示。“希望这场灾难能让中国意识到,与印度及其他下游国家更公开地讨论这些问题的重要性。”
迈克尔·斯托特(Islamabad报道)
巴基斯坦正专注于获取美国融资,以便为其重返全球资本市场做准备,该国财政部长表示。这是在多年依赖中国政府贷款后的重大转变。
穆罕默德·奥朗则布(Muhammad Aurangzeb)对《金融时报》表示,巴基斯坦上月寻求的华盛顿$10bn互换额度旨在向私人投资者发出“信心信号”,因为伊斯兰堡的军方支持政府希望利用与特朗普政府的密切关系,加速国际借贷。
他补充称,他认为美国进出口银行(ExIm Bank)和美国国际开发金融公司(DFC)可以发挥“非常重要的作用”,并表示两者已显示出对巴基斯坦的“风险偏好”。
“这是与美国开展合作的组合,主要关注贸易和投资流动,并有助于向国际资本市场发出信号。”他说道。
奥朗则布表示,伊斯兰堡已就$10bn互换额度从华盛顿获得“建设性接触”,并希望在“未来几个月内”得到答复。
资金短缺的巴基斯坦在2024年获批的70亿美元、为期三年的国际货币基金组织(IMF)计划下已削减财政赤字、降低通胀并重建储备。但伊斯兰堡估计的2025-26财年GDP增长率仅为3.7%,仍不足以满足快速增长的人口需求,且贫困率已上升。
奥朗则布表示,政府希望通过刺激出口来打破长期以来的国际收支危机。截至6月的年度贸易逆差扩大至4年来最高的395亿美元,而出口额却有所下降。
“如果回顾我们上一次通过注入流动性、推动消费主导增长时的情形……我们很快就会陷入困境,因为我们是一个高度依赖进口的经济体。”他说道,“因此我们正密切关注这一点……[着眼于]更多出口主导的增长。”
曾在花旗银行和摩根大通任高管、并曾执掌巴基斯坦哈比卜银行的奥朗则布渴望将巴基斯坦经济“从援助转向贸易和投资”。他表示,ExIm Bank可为波音飞机向新近私有化的巴基斯坦国际航空公司的销售提供融资,并帮助美国企业升级巴基斯坦的炼油厂,而DFC则可在巴基斯坦企业集团中持有股权。
巴基斯坦武装部队参谋长兼事实上的领导人阿西姆·穆尼尔(Asim Munir)元帅也与美国总统唐纳德·特朗普建立了密切的私人关系,并协助推动与伊朗的和平谈判——华盛顿相信这一联系可被用于将伊斯兰堡从北京的轨道上拉开。
根据世界银行2024年12月的数据,中国迄今仍是巴基斯坦最大的债权国,持有其$129.7bn外债总额的23%。尽管奥朗则布坚称巴基斯坦在美中之间的选择“不是非此即彼的讨论”,但他确认巴基斯坦并未寻求从中国获得额外融资。
Humza Jilani(伊斯兰堡报道补充)
签证威胁
安德鲁·杰克(伦敦报道)
哈佛商学院在去年美国总统唐纳德·特朗普政府威胁停止向其课程国际学生发放签证后,首次探索在欧洲和加拿大开设MBA课程的可能性。
据知情人士透露,这所美国顶级商学院去年与潜在合作伙伴进行了磋商,包括葡萄牙新里斯本大学经济与工商管理学院、瑞士IMD商学院、伦敦商学院和多伦多大学。
此举凸显了哈佛面临的压力,该校正陷入与白宫的斗争,因其试图对联邦拨款施加更大政治控制。特朗普政府推动改革其治理结构、削减资金并对所谓未能应对反犹太主义和限制言论自由行为施加处罚。
哈佛商学院证实,一年前就海外运营进行了磋商,“当时我们因签证不确定性而探索为国际学生提供美国境外选项。幸运的是,这一情况从未发生,目前也未在进一步探索中。”
然而,本月哈佛大学管理机构成员马里亚诺-弗洛伦蒂诺·奎利亚尔表示,哈佛更广泛地“倾向于进一步探索在海外设立一些分支机构”。在由哈佛学院院长戴维·德明主持的播客中,奎利亚尔表示,哈佛“基本上是一所美国机构,但同时也是一所具有全球角色和全球关系的大学”。
特朗普试图阻止该大学为其国际学生担保签证的努力目前已被法院驳回。
总部位于洛桑的IMD商学院院长大卫·巴赫证实,去年就其机构接收哈佛教师授课的首届MBA学生(可能由IMD协助)进行了初步讨论,此举正是在国际学生签证受到威胁之后。
其他美国大学已在海外设立校区和合作伙伴关系,包括芝加哥大学布斯商学院。哈佛曾尝试在海外开设高管短期课程,但在美国境外开设为期两年的MBA课程将打破其仅在波士顿校区进行线下MBA教学的传统。其MBA学费为170,000美元。
过去两年,美国大学的国际学生招生出现下降,移民和就业限制以及更广泛的政治环境已令申请者望而却步。
哈佛大学已在法律上暂缓了特朗普政府试图实施的一些措施,但其部分联邦拨款有所减少,并面临政府对该国高等教育部门施加更大政治审查的压力。
东欧地区
拉斐尔·明德尔 — 华沙报道
波兰奥委会主席罗多斯瓦夫·皮谢维奇(Radosław Piesiewicz)因涉嫌一起已倒闭的加密货币平台诈骗调查而在昨日被拘留。该平台与该国右翼反对派存在关联。
据调查人员称,皮谢维奇在一项与Zondacrypto的赞助协议相关的受贿指控调查中被捕。该平台于4月停止交易,投资者损失至少3.5亿兹罗提(€81)。
皮谢维奇是该丑闻中首位被捕的知名人士。Zondacrypto在倒闭前拥有1.3mn注册用户,其资金曾用于资助右翼活动、基金会和媒体。
总理唐纳德·图斯克试图将该公司与有组织犯罪、俄罗斯以及2023年前执政的法律与公正党(PiS)联系起来。PiS目前仍控制着波兰总统职位。
Zondacrypto倒闭后,调查人员审查其是否在破产程序开始前误导投资者。随后,他们将目光转向皮谢维奇收受的个人礼物,包括一块价值€40,000的瑞士豪华手表。司法部长称皮谢维奇对此予以否认。
在去年总统选举前,Zondacrypto赞助了波兰首次保守政治行动会议(CPAC)聚会,当时PiS候选人卡罗尔·纳夫罗茨基(Karol Nawrocki)获胜。在该会议上,纳夫罗茨基获得了时任美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的前国土安全部长克里斯蒂·诺姆(Kristi Noem)的背书。
此后,图斯克与纳夫罗茨基陷入争执,后者已阻挠多项政府法案,包括旨在监管波兰加密货币市场的立法。
在Zondacrypto倒闭后,图斯克关注其赞助PiS组织活动及向PiS政治家(包括前司法部长兹比格涅夫·齐奥布罗)运营的基金会提供资金的历史。上月,图斯克政府已请求美国引渡齐奥布罗以面对波兰多项欺诈指控。
该公司还向波兰最大右翼新闻频道TV Republika提供广告资金。该资金目前正在调查中,但频道所有者托马什·萨凯维奇(Tomasz Sakiewicz)否认不当行为。
波兰体育部长雅库布·鲁特尼茨基(Jakub Rutnicki)对逮捕表示欢迎。他在X平台写道:“这样的人永远不该担任波兰奥委会主席。”
模型崩溃比特币国库集团损失800亿美元:加密货币囤积者抛售代币并恢复以往活动 → 第11页
上月底,斯泰利在国会议员面前接受闭门问询,就其与爱泼斯坦的关系作证。
在问询过程中,斯泰利承认,在爱泼斯坦因2008年诱使未成年人卖淫罪入狱服刑后,他本人曾力主摩根大通继续为其保留账户。
他对议员们表示,摩根大通已终止与爱泼斯坦几乎所有其他银行往来关系,“在我看来,关闭支票账户是个艰难的决定”。
斯泰利称,他当时并不知道这些账户被用于帮助爱泼斯坦进行性交易活动,后者在2019年于狱中死亡,当时正等待审判。
爱泼斯坦经常从该账户提取数万美元现金,最终累计金额达$5,早在其首次定罪前,摩根大通内部已对这些交易产生警觉。
问询涉及多个熟悉的细节,包括两人在邮件中讨论迪士尼动画片《白雪公主》和《美女与野兽》中的公主角色。斯泰利再次表示不记得邮件内容,但后来又称可能见过一名身穿白雪公主服装的年轻女子。
新墨西哥州民主党众议员梅兰妮·斯坦斯伯里指出斯泰利回忆中的矛盾之处。
“你声称记得与爱泼斯坦的那次友好探视,而他正在服刑;但对多年后邮件中提到的‘白雪公主’女子,你却全无印象?”她问,“这太荒谬了。”她补充道。
斯泰利回应称,委员会审查的大部分交流发生在很久以前,他无法回忆起许多细节。
斯泰利坚称其与爱泼斯坦保持“密切的职业关系”,这一说法在去年伦敦审判中受到英国监管机构对他实施终身金融服务禁令时受到质疑。
当议员问及斯泰利为何在爱泼斯坦2008年定罪后仍选择与其保持友谊时,这名前巴克莱银行首席执行官答道:“在我看来,他不可能继续那样下去。我原本以为他会改过自新。他已经服过刑,缴过罚金。我原本以为他会改过自新。”
!

包括Vue在内的多家影院连锁使用该公司的软件管理电影放映——迈克·肯普 / 《图片报》 / 盖蒂图片社
尼库·阿斯加里、伊万·莱文顿 伦敦报道
一家为迪士尼和华纳兄弟探索公司提供技术的影院软件公司正在探索在伦敦进行首次公开募股(IPO),这对英国市场而言可能是一个福音。
据知情人士透露,总部位于曼彻斯特的Unique X正在考虑明年在伦敦上市,估值为3亿英镑。
包括Odeon、Vue和Cineplex在内的影院连锁使用该集团的软件管理电影放映和排片,而华纳兄弟探索、迪士尼和环球等工作室则利用其技术将电影全球分发至影院。
对于伦敦市场而言,一家新的科技公司上市将成为急需的亮点,近年来伦敦IPO数量不振,尽管进行了多项改革。
英国政界和政策制定者正在紧急推动企业在伦敦上市并吸引投资者支持。
英国政府已通过监管改革为上市提供激励措施,包括为新IPO提供印花税假期,并降低公开上市要求,以允许公司创始人保留更多股权。
上月,英国《金融时报》报道称,唐宁街曾询问私募股权高管为何不在英国推动其投资组合公司上市,这显示政府对当前局势的担忧。
今年上半年,英国仅有7家公司上市,募资5.77亿英镑。去年上半年,伦敦有9家公司上市,总计募资1.83亿英镑。
与此同时,创纪录数量的英国公司正被海外买家收购,凸显投资者对其认为被低估的英国企业的强劲需求。
Unique X于1997年在挪威成立,现已发展至在全球超过40,000块银幕上提供超过11亿个电影广告时段和软件服务。
欧洲投资公司Kartesia于2024年向该公司投资8,000万加元,估值未披露。Unique X当时表示,创始人克里斯·哈根(Chris Hagan)仍持有该公司85%的股权。
据其中一位知情人士透露,Unique X将通过伦敦上市募资1亿英镑,估值约为3亿英镑,并补充称“或许你所看过的60%的电影在某种程度上都使用了其技术”。
该公司同时探索其他选项,如出售,但时间表可能变化,他们提醒道。
Unique X未回应置评请求。Kartesia拒绝置评。
亚历山德拉·希尔
英国私募股权交易商的附带权益支付在去年税收政策重大调整前激增逾50%,达到54亿英镑。
英国税务海关总署(HMRC)数据显示,近4,000名收购高管分享了该行业有史以来最大规模的附带权益池,自税务部门2017年开始收集该数据以来尚属首次。
交易商在2024-25财年收到了附带权益支付——即成功交易利润分成。附带权益税收制度的调整于2025-26财年开始生效。
数据显示,2024年出现了一波公司出售和附带权益支付实现的热潮。
工党在2024年7月赢得政权,其竞选宣言承诺关闭附带权益税收的“漏洞”。
同年10月,时任财政大臣雷切尔·里夫斯宣布,将在2025年4月起将税率从28%提高至32%,并在2026年4月起进一步提高至34%——这一调整幅度比行业预期的更为温和。
仅230名交易商共享了£3.5bn的附带权益,表明少数基金实现了绝大部分利润分成。
该数字与英国整个行业在前一财年创造的总额持平。在2024-25财年收到附带权益的人中,仅有五分之一为女性。
私募股权公司通常在其投资回报超过最低门槛后,获得总利润的20%,其余利润则归还给养老金基金等支持者。
在美国,附带权益通常按交易逐笔支付。当私募股权基金的某项投资回报超过门槛时,交易商即可获得附带权益。
一位顶级私募股权税务律师表示,收购公司已通过将公司出售给其管理的其他基金来实现附带权益的实现,这一现象在当前艰难的退出环境下较为常见。
尽管高管们倾向于将这些收益再投入新基金以与新投资者保持一致,但这些收益已为税务目的报告。他补充道:“人们加速退出,以便能够适用较低的税率。”
BUSINESS INSIGHT TECHNOLOGY Richard Waters
there are plenty of unresolved questions about what part today's leading software products will play if AI reshapes working life
as profoundly as many in the tech world expect. But at least the worst of the indiscriminate selling of software stocks — a bloodbath known as the SaaS-pocalypse — appears finally to have run its course.
The latest sign of the relief rally was yesterday's 20 per cent share price jump that greeted Salesforce's quarterly earnings report, extending the rebound since the stock hit a low point in June to around 65 per cent.
Chief executive Marc Benioff has been declaring the SaaS-pocalypse over almost from the moment it started. He was at it again this week, this time apparently with more justification, though his company's shares are still a third below their late-2024 peak.
Software investors could also take heart from comments by Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic. The company's release of AI tools aimed at replacing some traditional software products triggered the worst of the sell-off.
"We are not interested in destroying anyone," Amodei declared in an interview on CNBC about a partnership with Salesforce — apparent evidence that a new period of "co-opetition" has set in.
The broad rebound in software stocks over the past two months shows Wall Street has at least set aside some of its worst fears. One was customers would start to drop their current vendors and use AI to vibe-code their own software. This always seemed a stretch.
Another realisation is some software companies are less prone to immediate disruption from AI than others. is particularly true if they hold data represents the "ground truth" about what is happening inside a company – making them so-called systems of record – and if they are closely tied into a company's workflows.
For general purpose tools without a tight link to essential operations, on the other hand, the SaaS-pocalypse is still in full swing. includes companies like Airtable, a once-hot maker of produc。
Bravo正在承受$5bn亏损。
但即使对更根深蒂固的软件产品的威胁看似不如从前紧迫,长期挑战依然存在。如果AI代理开始接管人类目前所做的一些工作,它们将不再需要当前广泛使用的那类软件。
其结果便是所谓的“去界面”软件——即剥离用户界面的产品,而用户界面迄今为止一直决定着软件的使用方式,使AI代理能够直接访问其中的数据。Salesforce在5月宣布将转向去界面模式,而Workday和SAP等公司也已跟进,推出了各自的部分去界面举措。
对于那些长期以来一直基于使用其软件的人数收费的公司而言,这显然构成商业模式风险。但更大的问题可能在于:它们对用户的价值很大程度上源自用户界面——即决定工作如何执行和管理的表单、仪表板、分析工具及其他功能。
一旦AI代理绕过用户界面直接获取数据,这些功能的大部分将以与旧有以人为中心的软件截然不同的新方式交付。
这可能使今天的核心软件沦为明天的后端数据库——或许仍不可或缺,但不再是能够收取溢价的技术。
抵御这一趋势的努力才刚刚起步。对软件公司而言,这意味着扩展记录系统功能,将自身打造成控制数据访问和使用方式的权威机构。另一种方式则是从单纯维护记录扩展至推动行动,调度代理以控制工作执行方式。
对于Anthropic和OpenAI而言,进一步深入应用层、嵌入客户运营已成为优先事项,尤其是在它们试图摆脱核心AI模型商品化威胁之际。收购Salesforce这类公司的分销渠道是加速这一进程的一种方式,但无法从根本上解决固有竞争。
从华尔街的反应来看,投资者至少终于愿意给予一些软件公司更多信任。但在最终确定AI赋能工作的形态之前,仍有诸多问题亟待解决。
richard.waters@ft.com
合同与招标
REC电力开发与咨询有限公司(REC有限公司的全资子公司)< / td>< / tr><>< rowspan="5">< / >< colspan="4">全球邀请(仅通过电子招标)< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">通过基于关税的竞争性投标(TBCR)流程,在建设-拥有-运营-移交(BOOT)基础上,为01(一项)州内输电项目选择输电服务提供商< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">REC电力开发与咨询有限公司(印度新德里,REC有限公司的全资子公司,后者为马哈拉施特拉邦中央公营企业)邀请提案,用于下述传输项目的RFP。一份报价和转让(BOOT)基础,采用“征求建议书(RFP)”的单阶段双信封流程。有意雇主请参阅征求建议书(RFP)< / >< / >
通知和征求建议书(RFP)文件可在以下网站获取: www.recpcd.in 与 www.recinidia.in.c.in
投标人可在工作日 13:00 至 16:00(印度标准时间)期间,于 2020 年 8 月 25 日至投标截止日前一天,支付不可退还的费用后领取 RFP 文件,费用如下: - ₹5,00,001(印度卢比伍拾万零壹整)或 - 700 美元(四十万美元整)或 - 900 美元(四十万美元整)或 - 1,000 美元(四十万美元整)
RFP 文件亦可从上述网站下载,但需在提交申请后按 RFP 文件所述缴纳不可退还费用(含 18% GST)。已购买 RFP 文件的投标人可获取问题解答与澄清。登记册中的关键时间节点如下:
| 序号 | 项目名称 | 征询澄清截止日期 | 提交 RFP 响应截止日期 | RFP 响应开启详情 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 与 RFP 文件相关的 765 千伏及 400 千伏线路建设(含 RFP 中提及的 PRIPs) | 2026 年 9 月 14 日 | 2026 年 10 月 27 日 10:00(印度标准时间) | 2026 年 10 月 27 日 20:00(印度标准时间) |
所有勘误、补遗、修正与延期等信息将在以下网站公布: www.recpcd.in 与 www.recinidia.in.c.in 投标人应定期访问以获取最新动态。
注意:REC/PCDC 保留在无需说明理由且无任何责任的情况下取消或修改流程的权利。本信息非要约。
| 投标流程协调方 | 发起方 | 首席执行官 |
|---|---|---|
| REC 电力开发公司 | 美国联邦政府 | Core-4, SCYPE 综合大楼,7号 Lodhi Road,新德里 110003,印度 |
| REC 电力开发与咨询有限公司 | 北方邦电力输送公司 |

公司与市场
科技
芯片集团反驳“循环融资”批评,超出分析师预期
迈克尔·艾克顿 — 旧金山报道
英伟达(Nvidia)周三晚些时候上调了其 2027 年 AI 芯片销售预期,试图反驳外界批评其大量投资及与客户融资交易构成高风险“循环融资”的指控。
这家全球市值最高的科技巨头报告截至上月底的季度营收为 96.2 亿加元,并预测本季度销售额约为 108 亿加元,超出华尔街预期。
首席财务官科莱特·克雷斯(Colette Kress)表示,英伟达预期强劲增长将持续,并预测明年销售额将增长 70%。她称客户需求预计将翻倍,但营收将受供应限制。
该预测,以及亚马逊网络服务(AWS)本季度同意部署额外 200 万台英伟达最新 GPU 的公告,推动其股价在纽约昨日下午交易中上涨逾 8%。
这份强劲的财报发布之际,该芯片集团正面临更大的投资者审查,质疑其如何利用庞大的资产负债表帮助客户为其 AI 基础设施建设提供资金。
本月,英伟达同意为一家华尔街投资者联盟提供部分担保,该联盟将为其客户提供 500 亿加元的芯片融资,并签署超过 100 亿加元的备用信贷额度,用于俄亥俄州一处 OpenAI 数据中心项目。这些交易均建立在其对多家最大客户的投资之上,并与其芯片相关的收益分成和备用协议挂钩。
克雷斯对分析师表示:“我们认可这类支持的规模,也知道有人会将其称为循环融资。我们对此看法不同。”她表示,这些投资“将非常出色”,且因对计算能力的强劲需求,“风险有限”。
在周三财报发布前,摩根士丹利分析师呼吁对这些交易进行“高度透明化”,批评者称这些交易涉及英伟达支撑其产品需求,若 使用量未达预期,可能令其面临硬件过剩的风险。
该芯片集团是 OpenAI 和人工智能实验室 Anthropic 的主要投资者,克雷斯表示,英伟达通过“资产负债表”支持的 实验室需求将在明年贡献其约四分之一的业务。
英伟达的财务表现已成为 基础设施繁荣健康状况的风向标,因其先进半导体被广泛用于训练和运行 模型。
可视化阿尔法(Visible Alpha)研究主管梅丽莎·奥托表示,明年 70% 的增长预期“远超”约 45% 的市场预期,是“非常显著的超预期表现”。
与推动英伟达大部分增长的核心 芯片业务相关的数据中心营收上季度为 89 亿加元,同比增长 117%。
首席执行官黄仁勋强调,除 OpenAI 外,越来越多公司正在推动 基础设施需求的增长。“去年此时,仅一家实验室在推动建设进程;而今天,我们正处于新 实验室和初创企业的黄金时代。”
黄仁勋为英伟达利用资产负债表帮助客户负担更多硬件的做法辩护。他表示,这一代 和数据中心企业“将成为史上最具影响力的科技公司之一”。
烟草。新产品

小规模但快速增长的细分市场获得监管机构更大认可
斯蒂芬妮·斯泰西 —— 伦敦报道
美国“烟草巨头”正在推出强度更高的尼古丁袋产品,以在快速增长的$5市场中争夺主导地位。
美国历史上大多数尼古丁袋的尼古丁含量在3毫克至6毫克之间,但据Stifel分析师马特·史密斯称,强度更高的产品销售增长“远快于整个细分市场”,目前占总销量的17%。
这种趋势在上周得到推动——美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准了菲利普莫里斯国际公司Zyn Ultra的11毫克强度产品。这是该监管机构批准的强度最高的产品。
三个月前,FDA调整了执法策略,允许部分新尼古丁袋在等待科学审查和正式批准期间继续上市。这使得制造商得以加快推出新版本和新口味的产品,监管机构越来越将其视为比吸烟危害更小的替代品。
随着烟草公司寻求新的利润增长点,尼古丁袋市场正快速扩张,而发达国家的吸烟率持续下降。随着用户对低强度产品产生耐受性,对强度更高产品的需求也随之上升。
“通常,你使用这些产品越多,耐受性就会越高,你会需要强度更高的尼古丁袋。”投资银行Needham分析师杰拉尔德·帕斯卡雷利表示。
菲利普莫里斯国际公司于今年6月在美国推出了9毫克和11毫克强度的Zyn Ultra尼古丁袋。英国美国烟草公司计划在下月底前推出其新产品Velo Max,强度为8毫克和12毫克。竞争对手奥驰亚集团则计划在全国范围内推广其12毫克强度的On! Plus尼古丁袋。
据研究公司欧睿国际(Euromonitor)数据,去年美国售出了约210亿个尼古丁袋,价值约52亿美元,占全球销量的一半以上。
尼尔森IQ与高盛证券汇编的数据显示,今年上半年,无烟尼古丁产品(包括尼古丁袋)的销售增长超过8%,而美国香烟销售下降2.4%。
香烟占所有尼古丁产品销量的近70%,但烟草巨头将尼古丁袋视为潜在的增长引擎。英国美国烟草、菲利普莫里斯和奥驰亚集团今年计划加大在美国的投资。巴克莱分析师帕拉夫·米塔尔表示,这将加剧尼古丁袋行业的“竞争加剧”态势,因为消费者推动了产品向强度更高、湿度更大的方向发展。
尼古丁袋于20世纪初由一群瑞典科学家发明,受到斯堪的纳维亚地区数百年流行的鼻烟启发。他们的创新之处在于用合成尼古丁取代鼻烟中的粉末状烟草叶——后者是已知致癌物。

Zyn品牌由菲利普莫里斯于2022年收购斯德哥尔摩瑞典火柴公司后获得,是首个进入美国主流市场的品牌。近期该品牌已失去市场份额,竞争对手包括英国美国烟草公司的Velo Plus。后者于2024年进入美国市场,采用柔和且高湿度的配方,最高强度达9毫克。
Philip Morris在6月开始在美国引入Zyn Ultra,该产品强度更高,但定价低于低强度标准版。
上月,该公司首席财务官Emmanuel Babeau表示,新产品将通过弥补“高强度细分市场的竞争缺口”来赢回市场份额。
Philip Morris此前曾指责FDA的缓慢审批阻碍其进入“最具活力的强度和口味细分市场”。
去年9月,在行业游说之后,美国监管机构启动了一项试点计划,以加速新型尼古丁产品的审查和批准。FDA表示,此举是其推动减少吸烟者伤害策略的一部分,尽管包括世界卫生组织在内的批评人士警告称,尼古丁袋和“最大尼古丁强度持续上升的趋势”正让新一代“面临终身成瘾的风险”。
“通常,你消费这些产品越多,耐受性就会越高”
美国监管机构态度的转变推动了该行业的“大规模创新浪潮”,杰弗瑞分析师Andrei Andon-Ionita表示。
英国烟草公司(BAT)首席执行官Tadeu Marroco表示,提供“不同强度水平以满足不同商业形式”是重要的,但市场上存在“如此多的细微差别”,包括口味,这甚至能让其低强度产品增加市场份额。
大型烟草公司在欧洲销售高强度尼古丁袋,当地产品无需面对FDA逐项授权的流程。Zyn和Velo在英国的强度分别高达每袋16毫克和17毫克。
Marroco表示,美国市场的增长将“不仅来自更多人使用该类别,还来自开始使用更多产品”,因为消费者越来越像欧洲人,他们通常每天消费约两倍数量的袋装产品。
SONG JUNG-A — 首尔
一家总部位于新加坡的激进基金向五家三星集团成员公司发送信函,提出以9,066亿韩元($655mn)收购其合计持有的S-1公司20.6%股权。S-1是韩国最大的安保服务提供商。
该要约将使Flashlight获得对该公司的管理控制权,这是激进投资者首次对三星关联公司发起收购要约,较周三收盘价溢价45%。
要约公布后,S-1股价昨日上涨7%。
Flashlight管理合伙人Sanghyun Lee表示,其基金受到韩国今年7月修订的《商法》鼓舞,该修订强制要求公司董事履行考虑所有股东利益的法律义务。
此前修订前,公司治理倡导者表示,董事会通常优先考虑财阀背后家族的利益,财阀是韩国经济主导的家族控制企业集团。“五家董事会的回应将表明董事们是否为股东服务,” Lee说。
五家董事会包括电池制造商三星SDI、三星人寿保险、三星火灾海上保险、券商三星证券以及信用卡公司三星卡。
此次要约是在该基金今年6月致函S-1董事会,敦促公司改善公司治理并提升股价后发起的。过去十年,S-1股价已下跌近三分之一。
Lee表示,董事会的回应“极其空洞”:“当他们承认董事会‘从未尝试分析自身公允股价’时,我感到震惊。”
他指出,S-1控制韩国安保服务市场半壁江山,但其股价却处于“严重折价”——约为年营业利润的4倍,而排名第二的SK Shieldus为12倍,全球同行平均为10.6倍。
“That is not a business problem — it is a governance problem,” Flashlight said in June, adding that every S-1 chief executive over the past 25 years had come from Samsung Group and had no professional experience in security services.
S-1否认存在治理问题,指出其拥有独立董事阵容,并表示公司“致力于提升股价和股东价值”。该公司还表示,今年已向股东支付每股3,200韩元($2.30)的股息,股息支付率维持在60%左右,远高于市场平均水平。
Flashlight表示,在收到五家三星董事会的回应前,将“保留所有选项”。
金融服务
ELLA LEE — 华盛顿 SUJEET INDAP — 纽约
KKR已同意支付$250mn,和解美国司法部对该私募股权公司的诉讼,后者被指控在2021年至2022年间收购过程中未能妥善向联邦政府提交文件。
该罚款是违反《哈特-斯科特-罗迪诺反垄断改进法》所处罚金中最高的一笔,该联邦法律要求收购方在完成交易前向包括联邦贸易委员会和司法部在内的监管机构提供并购方的财务信息。
该金额超过该法案下此前任何罚款的20倍,美国助理司法部长斯坦利·伍德沃德称。
KKR在周三宣布和解后表示强烈反对诉讼中的指控。该公司表示:“我们相信在之前的文件提交流程中,本公司始终善意行事,且与行业惯例一致。然而,我们认为持续诉讼将严重分散本公司精力,因此我们很高兴能够将此事画上句号。”KKR还表示,该民事罚款不会对公司或任何投资者产生财务影响,且将由外部律师事务所全额赔偿。
美国司法部去年1月以特朗普就任总统前最后一批行动之一起诉KKR,指控其反垄断部门打击其认为存在反竞争行为的私募股权交易。检察官指控KKR篡改文件、未提交文件或在2021年至2022年间至少16笔交易中“系统性”遗漏所需文件。
该诉讼是在拜登政府司法部与KKR早期和解谈判失败后提起的。随后该私募股权公司反诉司法部。
该公司在2025年1月的诉状中写道:“反垄断部门威胁采取行动的唯一目的,是以KKR为例,从而阻碍并购活动。”
司法部表示,KKR自2021年以来需根据《哈特-斯科特-罗迪诺法》提交超过100份并购前文件,且“对其要求了如指掌”。
联邦当局此前偶尔会针对华尔街投资者的HSR违规行为采取执法行动,其中包括美国政府与丹·洛布对冲基金Third Point就该公司持有的雅虎和陶氏杜Pont股份达成的两项小额和解。
KKR联合创始人亨利·克拉维斯是共和党政治家的长期捐助者,并在2017年向特朗普就职典礼捐款$1mn。
瑞安·麦克默罗 — 旧金山
Anthropic已与英国云计算初创公司Nscale达成协议,租用其位于西弗吉尼亚州旗舰数据中心的容量,为期六年,总价值约450亿加元。
此次合作是该AI实验室为满足今年秋季计划进行首次公开募股前激增需求而快速构建的处理能力网络的一部分。
据两位知情人士透露,Anthropic将在明年晚些时候芯片上线时开始使用该设施中的460兆瓦Nvidia下一代Vera Rubin处理器。
该公司已与亚马逊和SpaceX签署计算协议,并在今年筹集了数百亿加元资金用于基础设施建设。此外,Anthropic还与Meta就租用其计算能力进行了谈判,这可能是一笔价值数百亿加元的交易。
这家Claude聊天机器人制造商还单独承诺租用超过150亿加元的Google AI芯片,这些芯片安装在为其建造的数据中心中。
Anthropic的最新协议凸显出,尽管在AI基础设施上投入了数百亿加元,该公司仍在竭力确保足够的计算能力。
处理能力:此次合作是Anthropic为提升AI基础设施而达成的一系列协议的一部分

Nscale也在准备首次公开募股,最早可能在下个月进行。该公司在3月份以146亿加元估值完成20亿加元融资,领投方为挪威能源集团Aker和8090 Industries,Nvidia、戴尔和诺基亚等公司也参与了投资。
前英国副首相尼克·克莱格和Meta前高管谢丽尔·桑德伯格是该集团董事会成员。
该公司正在西弗吉尼亚州梅森县建设一个135万千瓦的数据中心,现场还有一个200万千瓦的天然气发电厂为其供电。Nscale估计该项目将耗资690亿加元。此外,该公司在挪威还有一个数据中心园区正在建设中,预计将被OpenAI等多家公司使用,这是其十几个数据中心项目之一。
与许多AI数据中心项目类似,西弗吉尼亚州这片占地2,250英亩的开发项目也引发了当地居民对噪音和其他建设影响的担忧。
Nscale本月发布了由安永(EY)编制的项目经济效益报告。咨询公司估计,该数据中心将为梅森县带来2,090个就业岗位和每年3.95亿加元的GDP贡献。
彭博社率先报道了Nscale-Anthropic交易。
公司与市场
香港案件将检验全球总部是否需为成员所审计失败承担责任
ELLESHEVA KISSIN — 伦敦 STEPHEN FOLEY — 纽约 ARJUN NEIL ALIM — 香港
中国恒大的清算人已获准将一项85亿加元的过失索赔案推进至普华永道(PwC)全球网络核心组织,而非仅限于该四大会计师事务所的香港与中国内地成员机构。
此案或将揭示四大会计师事务所传统商业模式的核心矛盾:它们在推广全球集团优势的同时,却通过法律上独立的本地机构运营。
恒大曾是中国最大的房地产开发商之一,于2021年违约,负债约3000亿加元。其倒闭后被发现曾在财务报表中虚增收入。
多家监管机构已认定,普华永道在香港与中国内地的审计师未能达到专业标准,在签署恒大财务报表时存在失职。相关调查已令普华永道香港与中国机构因监管罚款损失数百万加元。
恒大与普华永道国际并无直接合同关系,但清算人试图证明,全球实体在制定、监督和执行审计标准方面承担了足够责任,因此需为失职承担责任。
香港一名法官于周三裁定,全球组织"至少存在可争议的"对恒大承担的注意义务,并下令案件进入下一阶段——此裁决对普华永道国际构成打击,后者此前曾试图驳回该索赔。
普华永道并非一个庞大的全球合伙组织。四大会计师事务所采用网络结构,由独立的本地机构组成,确保各国审计机构在法律上独立。
这些机构由名为"普华永道国际"的全球总部协调,该组织是一家注册于英格兰和威尔士的私营公司,负责维护品牌、制定战略并强制执行统一标准。它还运营质量保证计划,确保网络内各机构符合这些标准。
这种分离是故意且具有法律意义的。每家成员机构仅对自身业务负责,无法约束普华永道国际或其他成员机构。
该体系旨在符合各国不同的审计监管要求,并保护各成员机构免受审计失败或咨询灾难后可能跨境传导的法律责任与声誉损害。
该体系自19世纪末起沿用至今。其重要性在2002年安然丑闻后的安达信倒闭事件中凸显。作为安然审计师,安达信采用更为集中的"单一实体"模式,导致其美国业务的法律影响扩散,最终拖垮了全球业务。
普华永道国际曾以未与恒大签约、沟通或收取其费用为由,请求法院驳回清算人的索赔。
此次裁决的直接后果仅为信息披露。香港法官Patrick Fung表示,内部文件对确定真实关系"至关重要"。这可能令清算人获取网络规则、审计质量程序以及普华永道国际与香港及中国内地机构间的沟通内容。
尽管普华永道全球网络发言人尚未确认是否会对裁决提起上诉,但该发言人表示正在"评估法律选项"。
The real value of the decision may be leverage: disclosure could strengthen the liquidators' claim and increase pressure for a settlement.
While PwC globally brought in record revenues of 569亿美元 last year, these are the aggregated revenues of its separate member firms, rather than belonging to PwC International.
PwC International has no employees, no income and bears no costs. Its own accounts are unaudited micro-company accounts, and its operational costs are paid for and reimbursed by the member firms. Its 2025 financial statements showed zero net assets, capital and reserves, and it has no shareholders to whom liability could be passed on.
However, Evergrande liquidators claim PwC International is liable for 56亿美元 of the total 85亿美元 it wants from the three entities.
A judgment against PwC International does not automatically make the US, UK or other member firms responsible for paying it. That will depend on the group's network agreements and insurance – as well as a lot of internal politics.
Two former PwC executives said a successful claim against PwC International would force it to use cover from its in-house insurer, L&F Indemnity, which is paid into by PwC member firms. A successful claim would not draw on funds from other firms in the network, they said.
"The firms have set themselves up in a way to make sure the wider network was protected," said one of the executives.
PwC International's latest annual report said its insurance limits were bigger than the "potential loss exposures", "such that any profit and loss exposure to PwC International is negligible".
Pursuing PwC International in addition to the separate claims made against the Hong Kong and Chinese businesses means the liquidators could triple-dip into the insurance pot if they prevail.
The decision concerns Hong Kong law and so far only relates to whether the claim is strong enough to proceed.
In a 2009 case that followed the collapse of Italian dairy company Parmalat, a US federal court found enough evidence that Deloitte's global body exercised control over its Italian member firm for a claim to proceed.
Deloitte's global and US entities later agreed to an $8.5 settlement. However, the court did not establish a general rule that global accounting networks were liable for their members.
PwC International itself has previously been drawn into litigation over a member firm. It was among the entities that paid $25.5mn in 2011 to settle US investor claims arising from the Satyam accounting fraud in India.
Claims tend to rest on the specific facts of each case and local law, rather than establishing general precedents that can be used to draw the international umbrella body into legal quarrels.
Still, the Evergrande case will put a spotlight on the relationship between a member firm and its global umbrella body, including its role in standard-setting and monitoring as well as how it affects a contentious audit.
Depending on what the liquidators find – and what damages, if any, they recover – lawyers around the world could be emboldened to pursue similar cases.
汤姆·威尔逊
一家美国企业情报公司在声称被一名被指控冒充中情局间谍的客户欺骗后,撤回了对一家受制裁的欧洲石油交易商的法律索赔。
此次和解是荷兰交易商尼尔斯·特鲁斯特与其昔日合伙人高拉夫·斯里瓦斯塔瓦之间长期纠纷的最新转折。特鲁斯特指控斯里瓦斯塔瓦虚假宣称自己是中情局秘密特工,以诈骗其财产。
特鲁斯特于2024年被英国制裁,此前《金融时报》首次报道其公司Paramount Energy and Commodities继续以超过G7价格上限的水平交易俄罗斯原油。欧盟今年初解除了对特鲁斯特的制裁。
特鲁斯特表示,他之所以继续交易俄罗斯原油,是因为斯里瓦斯塔瓦承诺让Paramount获得一个由中情局支持的秘密商品交易项目,作为回报,斯里瓦斯塔瓦将获得该公司一半股权。
斯里瓦斯塔瓦于2024年聘请总部位于纽约的Arkin Group协助其反击特鲁斯特的指控。该美国公司由中情局资深特工杰克·德维创立,后指控特鲁斯特在双方合作破裂后捏造了对斯里瓦斯塔瓦的指控。
去年,Arkin Group董事总经理维多利亚·加藤在一期播客节目中与斯里瓦斯塔瓦同台,指责特鲁斯特策划了一场“极其精心设计的……虚假信息运动”对付斯里瓦斯塔瓦,其中涉及一个“非常光鲜……性感的虚假间谍故事”。
然而,在8月25日由特鲁斯特、加藤和德维共同签署的一份声明中,Arkin Group承认他们被斯里瓦斯塔瓦误导,且其客户实际上“向特鲁斯特先生及他人声称自己是美国情报特工”。该声明于周三在法院提交,作为特鲁斯特与Arkin Group和解的一部分,双方撤回了相互提起的诉讼和反诉。
特鲁斯特去年因诽谤和诽谤罪起诉Arkin Group,此前该情报公司于今年3月提起反诉,将特鲁斯特的诉讼描述为SLAPP诉讼——即针对公众参与的战略诉讼。
这两起诉讼凸显了企业情报和影响力运动的混乱局面。在特鲁斯特诉讼中援引的另一个例子显示,Arkin Group在2024年12月的一次情报行业会议上发表演讲(该演讲目前仍可在线查看),声称受害者是斯里瓦斯塔瓦本人。
Arkin Group表示,其立场已根据新信息发生变化,包括向法院提交的特鲁斯特与斯里瓦斯塔瓦的电话录音,其中斯里瓦斯塔瓦似乎谈及其与美国情报部门的合作。在2023年5月5日2023年5月5日的一段录音中,据称可以听到斯里瓦斯塔瓦对特鲁斯特说,他“参与了一个多年来一直由美国政府开放和关闭的项目”。
特鲁斯特拒绝置评。斯里瓦斯塔瓦和Arkin Group未作回应。
ChatGPT制造商表示,代理在测试期间相互交谈并试图作弊
克里斯蒂娜·克里德尔 — 旧金山
据一份关于该事件的报告显示,OpenAI承认其AI代理在超过一周的时间内未被发现已突破控制、访问互联网并在测试期间自行入侵初创公司Hugging Face。
这家估值$852bn的初创公司在报告中表示,其内部监控系统直到7月19日才发现问题,尽管该模型早在11天前就已开始访问互联网并在7月11日开始攻击Hugging Face。
由OpenAI联合安全专家进行的调查显示,ChatGPT制造商在其最先进的AI系统开始协作并发动黑客攻击时几乎全然不知。
该事件也凸显了名为强化学习的密集训练技术所带来的风险,该技术正被实验室广泛用于研发更强大模型的竞赛中。
OpenAI详细说明了其模型如何“持续且罕见‘放弃’”网络任务。该公司表示:“在此过程中,它们随着时间的推移常常转向使用超出范围的方法来完成任务。”
调查还发现,这些模型“有时试图删除或篡改其输出或消息日志”,以隐藏它们在训练练习中作弊的事实。
上月披露的Hugging Face入侵事件已促使AI实验室反思,是否追求最强大模型的压力导致了危险的实践和训练安全措施的不足。
代理(即可基于人类指令独立执行复杂任务的系统)的进步已加剧了人们对AI可能在现实世界中造成无意损害的担忧。
在该事件后,数千名美国顶级AI公司的员工签署了一封信,呼吁控制研究节奏。
由包括CrowdStrike在内的外部顾问及第三方AI测试机构METR和Redwood Research共同进行的调查发现,早在5月OpenAI的代理就“开始出人意料地相互通信”。
在一次训练运行中,代理重新利用了由OpenAI托管的第三方软件,“作为一个新兴的‘留言板’”在彼此之间传递信息。
上月发动攻击的代理使用该系统“发布请求”并研究如何在OpenAI的测试中作弊。代理询问了存储在Hugging Face上的OpenAI练习信息,后者是一个关于AI的技术信息库。代理随后在该留言板上发布了用于实施网络攻击的凭证。
OpenAI在7月4日因系统活动量过大而崩溃时才察觉到异常。员工重建系统后,代理重新创建了该“留言板”。
OpenAI在报告中表示:“这是已知首例自动代理集体未经授权采取攻击性行动的案例”,并警告各行业组织需为AI辅助的网络威胁做好准备。
该实验室还指出了强化学习这一广泛用于领先AI公司的技术,即系统在无明确指令下被训练以完成特定目标,并在成功时获得奖励。
OpenAI表示,在测试中它为模型设置了不可能完成的网络攻击任务,而代理为获取奖励尝试所有可能方法的努力最终导致了此次入侵。
OpenAI在回顾性分析中表示,此类行为确实在推动Hugging Face事件的模型训练过程中不断增加。
这一供认凸显了OpenAI及其他以类似方式开发模型的AI公司面临的核心问题。此前《金融时报》曾报道,OpenAI被警告其训练方法可能导致脱离环境的黑客事件,因为早期测试显示模型能够逃逸并造成现实世界损害。
在无法完成或难以完成的任务中,模型常通过在线寻找解决方案或变通方法来"作弊"——这一现象被称为"奖励黑客"。
记录代理推理过程的"思维链"显示,模型曾考虑是否允许对其他公司进行黑客攻击。"我们正在攻击第三方……这显然未经授权……但却是目标解决方案。"日志中如此写道。
部分代理在遇到留言板后提出异议。"这太疯狂了,多智能体协调,明显是基础设施黑客攻击。我们不该这么做。"另一代理的思维链中如此记录。
OpenAI表示已着手应对"奖励黑客"问题,且绝大多数案例已被捕获。
"然而,随着OpenAI开发更复杂的强化学习任务和更强大的AI模型,某些黑客行为仍可能逃过检测。"该公司补充道。
针对此次事件,OpenAI表示已"暂时放缓"模型训练节奏,并"暂停"强化学习的使用,同时加强监控并完善隔离系统,以阻断测试模型的互联网访问。该公司还表示正在改进对模型的奖励机制,训练其在行动中更加诚实,并加强对思维链的监控。
英国企业
公用事业
债权人寻求明确再国有化前景 在10月前投入额外£2bn前获取确认
吉尔·普利默、吉姆·皮卡德
泰晤士水务的债权人与英国政府陷入僵局,贷款方要求安迪·伯纳姆在投入另一笔20亿英镑(最快10月到位)前明确该公司再国有化的任何潜在可能性,以维持这家陷入困境的公用事业公司的运营。
在伯纳姆出任首相前,他曾呼吁将泰晤士水务收归国有,但此后他并未提出任何具体实施计划。
伯纳姆现预计将把英国最大水务公司的未来决定推迟至最晚10月底,令政府与泰晤士水务债权人(包括困境债务基金 Elliott Management 和 Silver Point Capital)陷入对峙。
其为泰晤士水务(为伦敦及东南部1600万人提供水务和污水服务)制定的救助计划正由行业监管机构英国水务监管局(Ofwat)评估。
泰晤士水务目前依赖一笔£3bn的昂贵贷款支撑,该笔贷款将于12月到期。额外的£2bn贷款可能需通过法院批准,这一过程可能耗费数周。
接近伦敦水务财团的人士表示,在政府仍致力于“市场解决方案”之前,他们不会提供额外紧急融资。
据了解讨论内情的人士称,债权人寻求的保证还包括英国水务监管局(Ofwat)将其计划(该计划获得泰晤士水务管理层支持)进行公众咨询。
债权人尚未与新任环境大臣安杰拉·伊格尔会面,集团内多名投资者据悉对达成交易感到不耐烦,该交易将使他们正式接管该公用事业公司,并可能在2030年前将其重新上市。
债权人包括逾100家金融机构,若泰晤士水务被推入SAR,这些机构将面临巨额损失。
伯纳姆仍在考虑在政府特别管理制度(SAR)下进行临时国有化。
其发言人表示:“在我们继续与政府合作寻求解决方案的同时,泰晤士水务的持续融资需求仍在密切审查中,任何与满足这些需求相关的债权人投票将必然反映对长期解决方案能否实现的信心。”
要推进SAR,政府或泰晤士水务必须向高等法院申请,理由是该公司已资不抵债或违反环保义务。
这意味着伯纳姆可能更倾向于等到公司现金耗尽,以减少法律索赔的风险。
“让公司先行倒闭有诸多优势,因为政府未采取仓促行动,因此不会因此受到质疑,”一位接近讨论的律师表示。
另一种选择是通过立法绕过常规程序,正如部长们为国有化英国钢铁公司所做的那样。
首相盟友表示,首相从未计划立即将该公司置于国家控制之下。“泰晤士水务SAR从未迫在眉睫,”一位官员称。
然而,其他政府内部人士承认,SAR流程比预期更复杂,且在10月28日预算案前正在制定一系列选项。即便如此,他们表示尚不清楚财政大臣约翰·希利在发表财政声明时是否会做出决定。
若泰晤士水务进入SAR,其债务偿付和利息将被冻结,为基础设施投资释放现金。债权人将有权获得回购。
若泰晤士水务随后从SAR中转售,政府预计将收回投入该业务的资金,据接近讨论的律师及泰晤士水务自身顾问称。
Thames Water表示:“我们继续获得债权人的支持。我们正在积极构建协议,以支持其长期财务稳定性。”

点名 初级员工 被敦促返回办公室以提升人际技能
在多年支持混合办公和AI投资后,一些公司已得出结论:面对面协作至关重要——图尔加·阿克门 / 埃帕 / Shutterstock
咨询高管们正在考虑更频繁地命令初级员工返回办公室,以锤炼其人际技能,因为AI正在接管越来越多的技术工作。
英国最大咨询公司的高管们表示,AI已使人际技能变得愈发宝贵——他们认为这些能力必须在办公室中培养。
“我们在过去几年看到的变化——人们将生活安排成……长期在家——这根本不是在AI时代取得成功的路径,”英国EY咨询业务负责人塞耶·甘巴里表示,“我们正面临一种局面:我们将不得不减少灵活性,但为了培养人际技能。”
她说,AI将越来越多地协助日常咨询工作,而人类顾问则“必须擅长我们真正擅长的——即成为人类……我们必须面对面,一旦这些代理变为远程办公”。甘巴里表示,强制那些“围绕远程办公安排生活”的员工更频繁地来办公室将是一项“真正的领导挑战”。
但她补充道:“要在咨询行业建立职业生涯并培养所有这些人际技能……你无法通过如此多的远程工作实现。”EY表示仍将维持其“长期以来的灵活性政策”。
这些言论反映了白领行业更广泛的思维转变。在多年投资AI并捍卫混合办公后,一些雇主已得出结论:该技术已使当面协作变得至关重要。
微软去年曾告知员工,他们必须每周到办公室三天,首席执行官萨提亚·纳德拉表示,在AI时代,当面办公“甚至更为重要”。摩根大通首席执行官杰米·戴蒙也一再强调,年轻银行家需要在办公室学习专业判断力。
咨询行业依赖学徒制模式,初级员工通过观察资深员工如何处理客户和讨论会议来成长。但甘巴里表示,在新冠疫情后的远程办公热潮中,团队“放弃”了人际技能培训——包括同理心、叙事能力和领导力——转而优先发展AI和技术技能。
她补充道,EY现正加大此类培训投入:“我们需要回归未来。”
这场争论正值各公司对办公室出勤采取不同做法之际。德勤继续给予各团队自主决定当面办公频率的权限,而EY和普华永道则实施混合办公政策。
竞争对手四大会计师事务所之一的KPMG正在尝试通过当面培训“重塑”其帮助员工培养“软”技能及技术技能的方式
费尼霍(KPMG合伙人)表示:“面对面学习的速度……将比远程办公快得多。”
负责该公司英国咨询业务的卡尔姆·利希斯表示,人工智能带来的变革使“对于刚入行者而言,直接向他人学习的机会比以往任何时候都更加重要”。多位高管表示,年轻员工将被期望花费更多时间与同事共事。
波士顿咨询集团伦敦办事处正在扩大办公室活动,包括国际象棋、帕德尔球和英式篮网球俱乐部,以鼓励在疫情期间入职的初级顾问更多时间到岗。
2023年,德勤和普华永道在发现英国最年轻的员工在团队协作和沟通技能方面弱于疫情前同期人群后,开始为他们提供额外辅导。
上市咨询公司埃森哲英国高级合伙人马特·普雷布尔表示,他已考虑到需要面对面互动来帮助培训年轻顾问的人际技能,但无需强制出勤,因为年轻员工已认识到办公室工作的益处。
英国十大会计和咨询公司Azets目前已将大学毕业生的学位要求从2:1降至2:2,并与酒吧和酒店合作帮助毕业生提升软技能。该公司还在审查要求新员工到岗的时间,鼓励初级员工每周到岗四天以提升非正式学习的机会。
伦敦 埃莱舍娃·基辛
银行业
萨姆·弗莱明、尼库·阿斯加里 伦敦
英国财政部将要求英格兰银行(央行)设定一个新的官方目标,即推动数字货币和支付创新,这表明政府希望央行进一步推动英国成为稳定币及其他数字资产的中心。
英国财政部正在为央行设定一项法律“次要目标”,即支持支付系统和数字货币的创新,以确保英国的监管体系跟上快速发展的数字资产市场步伐,并保持伦敦的竞争力。
此举是在加密货币公司批评英格兰银行对数字资产采取其认为保守的态度之后出台的,同时也反映了央行与英国金融行为监管局(FCA)为监管数字资产市场所做的更广泛努力。
英格兰银行的新法定目标可能会受到金融服务高管的欢迎,因为这表明央行对数字资产增长的重视程度。传统银行和资产管理公司正越来越多地探索使用区块链技术来现代化其系统并降低成本。
该目标反映了监管机构推动并监管金融服务和支付领域区块链技术使用的努力。他们正在寻求监管诸如代币化抵押品、代币化黄金及结算等领域,以期现代化金融市场并维护英国的竞争力。
英国财政部金融城事务大臣露西·里格比表示,代币化和分布式账本技术等发展应改变全球金融市场。
“尽管金融稳定始终是央行的首要目标,但这一次要目标将支持央行继续推动支付和数字金融的创新,确保英国继续在金融服务领域保持全球领先地位,”她说。
今年6月,英格兰银行公布了其计划中的稳定币监管规则,以监管与英镑挂钩的代币市场。
英格兰银行希望鼓励受监管英镑稳定币的增长。目前美元代币主导全球稳定币市场,而英格兰银行此前曾因计划对英国稳定币施加所有权限制以维护金融稳定而受到批评,加密货币高管表示此举将阻碍增长。
该措施已被取消,并被一项£40的发行限额所取代。
欧盟于2024年底通过了全面的加密货币规则,而美国总统唐纳德·特朗普则热切鼓励华尔街参与者使用区块链和加密货币技术。
新的法定目标将通过对《金融服务与市场法案》的修正案来实施,该法案将于9月在英国上议院进行辩论。该目标将从属于英格兰银行维护金融稳定的首要目标。
英国财政部表示,英格兰银行将被要求每年就新目标进行报告,以鼓励其跟上技术变革的步伐。英格兰银行金融稳定副行长萨拉·布里登表示,此举将“进一步推动”其在金融服务创新方面的工作。
尼库·阿斯加里(Nikou Asgari) 乔纳森·文森特(Jonathan Vincent) 伦敦报道
自去年年中以来,比特币国库公司的总市值已蒸发超过800亿美元,此前轰动一时的加密货币购买热潮未能推高其股价。
《金融时报》对持有最多比特币的50家公司进行分析发现,其合并市值从2025年7月的1500亿美元暴跌至如今的仅670亿美元。过去12个月内,跌幅从1240亿美元下滑,损失570亿美元。
一家西班牙连锁咖啡店、一家日本服装零售商及一家美国电池制造商,均为全球数百家企业之一,这些企业在2024年末及2025年全年争相通过举债或增发股权购买比特币,试图以此提振股价。
它们受到美国比特币布道者迈克尔·塞勒(Michael Saylor)的启发。塞勒的软件公司转型为比特币买家后,于2020年开始囤积代币,去年加速购买并鼓励其他公司高管效仿。
但这股热潮已证明短命。如今,许多公司正抛售手中代币并重回原业务。
“这种模式注定失败,”加密货币交易公司LO:TECH研究主管亚当·摩根·麦卡锡(Adam Morgan McCarthy)表示,并补充称这股狂热“已死,我认为不会再卷土重来,也不会再出现新的跟风者”。
当公司宣布计划购买比特币时,其股价最初曾飙升,但随着投资者撤离,大多数公司股价随即暴跌。投资者质疑这一模式:依赖持续举债或增发股权为加密货币投资融资,且完全依赖比特币价格涨跌。
过去一周,美国财政部出人意料地干预债券市场,动摇了投资者对加元的信心,并推动所谓“贬值交易”流向比特币、黄金等资产,比特币和股价随之反弹。
尽管如此,比特币国库公司的股价仍远未恢复昔日水平。据《金融时报》分析,策略公司(Strategy)的市值较去年峰值已下跌790亿美元,占前50家公司跌幅的大部分。
《金融时报》的分析显示,在50家公司中,有43家的股价目前低于宣布比特币国库转型前的水平,其中35家跌幅至少达一半。
《金融时报》仅关注近期转型购买比特币的公司,未将加密货币交易所、矿工或将比特币作为日常运营资产负债表一部分的其他公司纳入统计。
“它们只是在追风口、蹭热点,试图复制模式,但想要每周都能重返市场几乎不可能,”法国兴业银行旗下CIB部门科技与数据研究专家埃里克·伯努瓦(Eric Benoist)谈及数百家规模较小的跟风者时表示。他补充称,抛售与收缩行为标志着市场正在“理性化”。
过去12个月,比特币经历长期低迷,跌幅达30%,交易价格徘徊在约$78,000附近。比特币国库公司跌幅更甚,因许多公司采用杠杆押注购买加密货币,并在下行过程中更快解套。
今年7月,50家最大比特币持有者从净买家转为净卖家,策略公司(Strategy)带头抛售。据BitcoinTreasuries.net数据,这些公司在7月合计净抛售2,500枚比特币,价值约$160。
黑暗时刻:波兰一家加密货币交易所。持有最多比特币的50家公司合并市值从2025年7月的1500亿美元暴跌至如今的仅670亿美元 NurPhoto / Getty Images
当Strategy开始抛售其持仰时,该公司在6月底至8月中旬期间出售了近7,000枚比特币,总计$430mn,以筹集现金支付其计息工具持有人。
面对尖锐批评,Saylor表示其“永不出售”的信条仅针对个人持仓,而非公司持仓。他写道:“Strategy是一家上市公司,而非我的钱包。”他在X平台上表示。
包括UTXO Management和Pantera Capital在内的加密风险投资公司去年向多家加密货币库存公司投入了数亿加元,而包括Cantor Fitzgerald在内的投资银行则牵头完成了多笔交易。
许多其他规模较小的比特币持有公司——包括一家名为Value Creation Co的日本营销公司——的股价也大幅下跌。
押注其他代币的公司表现同样不佳。全球最大以太坊持有者Bitmine Immersion Technologies的股价自2025年7月峰值以来已下跌85%。
尽管今年进行了出售,Strategy的比特币储备仍是全球公司中最大的。
Benoist表示,如果Saylor能解释持有如此多比特币的最终目标,市场可能会做出更积极的反应。
他问道:“最终目的是什么?如果你要向全球投资者募资,就必须让他们了解更宏大的愿景,否则筹集资金用于累积持仓将变得越来越困难。”
我们的全球团队为您提供24小时不间断的市场动态资讯和观点,请访问ft.com / markets
金融板块
LEE HARRIS — 伦敦
去年,随着贷款机构试图为更多放贷释放资本,银行通过蓬勃发展的证券化交易将风险几乎翻倍地转移给保险公司。
国际信贷投资组合经理协会数据显示,去年保险公司签约承保价值47亿欧元的合成风险转移(SRT)违约风险,高于2024年的27亿欧元。
据巴克莱分析师数据,去年欧洲银行通过SRT向包括对冲基金和私人信贷基金在内的投资者转移了价值579亿欧元的风险。
银行利用此类结构将一揽子贷款的违约风险转移给外部投资者,以换取费用。这些投资者通常需承担高达约定上限的损失,而银行则从监管机构获得更有利的资本待遇,这意味着它们随后能够放贷更多。
但保险公司的优势在于可“非资金化”承保此类风险,即无需像对冲基金那样预留资金覆盖损失。
对冲基金及其他投资者通常会在SRT交易期间将抵押品存入账户,而保险公司则可依赖其信用评级和现有资产负债表管理风险。
提供此类安排的财产及意外伤害保险公司通常还为企业投保人承保飓风到网络攻击等风险。因此,监管机构允许它们相对廉价地承担大量非相关风险,如银行违约风险。
慕尼黑再保险、Fidelis合伙公司及AIG支持的保险公司Convex均为提供SRT承保的机构之一。
国际信贷投资组合经理协会称,2019年至2025年间,银行通过SRT向保险公司转移了109亿欧元的信用风险。SRT因与信用违约掉期(CDS)相似而受到监管机构和分析师的审查,后者曾在2008年全球金融危机期间令AIG等大型保险公司濒临倒闭。
“信用违约掉期是无资金化的信用保护,”惠誉评级市场研究主管Monsur Hussain表示,“本质上是相同的技术”,但他补充称,“AIG的交易规模是欧洲保险公司目前无法企及的”。
Hussain表示,惠誉已对银行在保险公司或其他交易对手方停止提供SRT承保时面临的风险敞口表示担忧。“如果市场参与者因任何原因无法提供或续展保护,银行可能被迫去杠杆化,因为资本要求会突然上升,”他说道
科技板块
宋正雅(Song Jung-A) 丹尼尔·图多(Daniel Tudor) 首尔报道
今年夏天,主修电气工程的韩国大学四年级学生金泰宇(Kim Tae-woo)没有假期。相反,他正在首尔的一所芯片制造培训学校度过假期,希望能在SK海力士或三星电子找到一份工作。
金泰宇是该培训学校30名通过竞争性筛选进入的学员之一,该项目由政府资助,旨在培养半导体质量控制专家。
为期三个半月的课程涵盖从半导体元件和芯片设计到数据分析的所有内容,平日上课时间为上午10点至下午6点。他在未能在三星及多家外国芯片制造商获得实习机会后报名参加。
“我最大的希望是加入SK海力士,但竞争变得激烈,因为班上所有人都想去SK海力士或三星工作,”他说。“我只是想在简历上再添一笔。”
随着求职者申请韩国两大芯片制造商的数量激增,首尔的半导体培训学校正蓬勃发展,这得益于人工智能热潮带来的创纪录收益和引人注目的员工奖金。
今年5月,三星与其78,000名半导体员工达成了一项里程碑式的利润分享协议,预计内存芯片部门的平均支付金额将接近400,000加元。
竞争对手SK海力士去年同意在未来十年内向员工分配10%的营业利润,根据预期收益计算,这意味着今年平均奖金约为500,000加元。
“奖金非常丰厚,”金泰宇说。“竞争更激烈了,但他们也在招聘更多人。”
课程的大部分内容与他在大学的课程重叠,但金泰宇希望从前芯片工程师那里学到一些实用技能。
该培训学校还提供简历写作和面试准备课程,专门针对SK海力士和三星的招聘流程。它甚至承诺,如果毕业生在大公司找到工作,将退还学费并支付等额奖金。
人工智能热潮正在重塑这个国家的教育优先事项,在韩国,学历传统上定义了成功。
几十年来,韩国最优秀的学生都倾向于学医,私人导师则专注于帮助学生进入顶尖大学。
如今,由三星和SK海力士赞助的半导体系——这些项目保证毕业后就业——正吸引越来越多的兴趣,而培训学校也在迎合追求高薪芯片制造业职业的求职者。
在2026年入学周期中,SK海力士相关的半导体项目在多所顶尖大学的申请率超过了医学院,而医学院的申请人数则下降了近三分之一,降至五年来最低点。
成均馆大学工程学教授权锡俊(Kwon Seok-joon)表示,芯片制造商慷慨的奖金改变了学生对这一行业的看法。
“20年来,医学是韩国唯一能保证财富和声望的职业,”他说。“海力士的奖金打破了这一垄断。这是首次,芯片工程师在家庭讨论更安全的未来时,能与医生相提并论。”
“有人甚至说他们后悔上了大学,”Saramin的金某表示,“大学毕业生实在太多了。”
金某指出,对蓝领工作的看法正在改变。“办公室员工常面临五十出头就退休的压力,而技术工人通常享有更高的就业保障,”他说道。
政府上周表示将设立新基金,帮助年轻人就业并支持人工智能等增长产业投资。
据当地媒体估算,该基金规模可能超过100万亿韩元(约72加元),资金将来自芯片热潮带来的税收意外收益。
“人们曾认为只有白领工作才能通往成功,”金某说,“这种观念正在弱化,家长也更重视实用技能。”
然而,教育工作者警告称,半导体项目的热潮——如同该行业本身——可能具有周期性。
许多顶尖工程专业学生仍在重考全国大学入学考试,以转换专业攻读医学。最新可用数据显示,2024年近2,500名学生退出韩国三所顶尖大学,主要是为了申请医学院。
梦罗 Academy 校长任成镐表示,半导体项目的吸引力取决于行业周期。
“仅在两年前,人们还在说三星正在衰落,”他说道,“我们不知道这波热潮会持续多久。”
SAP / 548 宝马(BMW) / 392 英飞凌科技(Infineon Technologies) / 359 大众优先股(Volkswagen pfd) / 356 大众(Volkswagen) / 347 法国兴业银行(Societe Generale) / -4.99 法国巴黎银行(BNP Paribas) / -4.79 保乐力加(Pernod Ricard) / -4.59 法国电信(Orange) / -4.19 法国农业信贷银行(Credit Agricole) / -3.97
苗彦良 市场洞察

加元在全球经济中的主导地位退却从未可能一帆风顺。整合期或局部反转完全可能发生,加元的首要地位可能持续相当长一段时期。
其中一个迹象是其在全球外汇储备中的份额变化。长期趋势显示多元化明显,占比从世纪之交的约72%降至今日的57%。但这一数字较去年底的56%有所上升。
涨幅虽小,但约一半归因于汇率估值效应。然而,在美股强势及美国在人工智能产业关键领域的进展助推下,这一变化助长了“去加元化可能停滞”或“再加元化阶段已开启”的观点。
历史更支持更谨慎的解读。英镑使用轨迹表明储备货币转换鲜有直线式逆转。
1899年,英镑占已知官方外汇储备约64%。
至1913年,该比例降至48%,加元在20世纪20年代中期超越英镑成为主导储备货币。然而,这一路径并不平坦。英镑在1928年曾短暂重夺榜首,但翌年份额即降至41%。短暂反弹并未改变整体趋势。
去加元化可能持续的一个原因在于美国国债。数十年来,美国国债通过提供深度流动性与广泛接受的价值存储,支撑了加元的国际角色。随着美国公共债务上升及金融制裁等措施的国际使用扩大,一些机构已开始重新审视对美债的依赖。
因此,加元资产内部出现明显分化。加元本身与短期国债仍保有大部分现金般的吸引力,继续满足全球交易、结算、融资与抵押品需求。然而,长期国债的吸引力已下降。自2020年以来,所谓的长期美债“便利溢价”似乎
大幅下跌。这是投资者愿意为放弃这些债券所放弃的收益率,因为这些债券提供安全性和流动性服务。
去年晚些时候,美联储工作人员文欣·杜(Wenxin Du)、里特·吉拉提(Ritt Keerati)和杰西·施雷格(Jesse Schreger)的一篇论文显示,便利性溢价不仅已下降,有时甚至转为负值。也就是说,投资者为持有长期美国债务寻求更高回报。相比之下,加元本身及短期国债的便利性溢价则更为稳固。
这表明储备管理者仍重视加元流动性,但对长期国债所提供的传统储备功能的重视程度有所下降。实际上,官方对加元资产的需求正从“安全资产”需求转向流动性需求。

若国债正在失去部分储备吸引力,美国股票的需求能否支撑加元?近年来美国股票表现良好,外国官方机构(如央行)也做出了回应。在2025年5月至2026年4月期间,它们净买入了$121bn美国股票和$49bn企业及其他债券,同时抛售了$18bn长期国债和$33bn机构债券。换言之,它们正在美系内部寻求收益与分散化,而非彻底逃离加元资产。
然而,股票在最需要安全性的时刻往往极为波动。这限制了储备管理者对美国股票的使用程度。
人工智能革命能否以另一种方式强化加元?若与该技术相关的交易越来越多以加元计价,一些评论家认为“AI加元”或将出现,类似于“石油加元”因石油贸易主要以加元计价而支撑加元需求的方式。但与能源不同,技术领导地位难以轻易被取代。
人工智能的财政影响同样不确定。它可能提升美国增长趋势,但无法单独解决该国长期债务轨迹的担忧。
对储备管理者而言,审慎的结论是:国际储备体系的形态——以及加元在其中的角色——仍在演变。但近期发展尚未构成多元化的明确终结。
缪彦良(Miao Yanliang)是中国国际资本公司首席经济学家。本文仅反映其个人观点。

纳斯达克100指数在华尔街午间交易中上涨1%,标普500指数则上涨0.8%。
周三晚些时候,英伟达报告称截至7月的三个月营收为$96.2亿,并预测本季度销售额约为$108亿,超出华尔街预期。该公司首席财务官还预测明年销售额将增长70%。
“中期乐观前景……释放出对当前AI需求失控式增长将延续至明年的更强信号”,德意志银行高级国际经济学家彼得·西多罗夫表示。
科技股昨日上涨,受英伟达上调AI芯片销售预期提振。
截至纽约时间下午早些时候,英伟达股价上涨8.8%。网络安全公司CrowdStrike在公布营收同比增长26%后,股价上涨17%。
Yardeni Research的分析师指出,尽管市场对业绩结果的反应并未“过度热情”,但可能“说服股东重新考虑对AI峰值的担忧”。
美国以外的市场表现较为逊色。英国富时100指数下跌0.8,法国CAC指数下跌1.7。德国DAX指数上涨0.3,香港恒生指数下跌0.3,日本东证指数上涨0.2。
中东基准原油Intermediate期货价格上涨0.1,约为每桶$82。油价小幅走高,因投资者对霍尔木兹海峡外交突破的可行性愈发怀疑。
美国债券在投资者等待美联储主席凯文·沃什在今日杰克逊霍尔年会上的首次主旨演讲时表现平稳。10年期美国国债收益率下跌0.01个百分点至4.65,而对利率敏感的2年期美国国债收益率下跌0.01个百分点至4.21。债券价格上涨时收益率下降。
国际原油基准布伦特原油上涨1.1,交易价格约为每桶$89。
沃什可能在演讲中“更多关注美联储的长期政策框架,而非下一次利率决策”,St James's Place首席经济学家赫塔尔·梅塔写道。
但梅塔补充称,市场仍将“寻求美联储对2%通胀目标承诺的进一步保证,以及若通胀压力再次抬头,决策者将如何应对”。
投资者预计在9月美联储会议上,加息25个基点的概率约为35%。
英国10年期国债收益率下跌0.01个百分点至5.03。德国10年期国债收益率上涨0.02个百分点至3.25。
市场动态
股票 / 标普500 / Eurofirst 300 / 日经225 / 富时100 / 上证综指 / 博维斯帕 水平 / 773799 / 2602.39 / 6613198 / 10792.54 / 3956.57 / 175105.92 日内涨跌幅 / 0.81 / -0.75 / -0.20 / -0.79 / 1.13 / 0.30 货币 / 加元指数(DXY) / 加元 / 欧元 / 日元 / 加元 / 英镑 / 人民币 / 加元 / 雷亚尔 / 加元 水平 / 9914 / 1165 / 159.320 / 1.358 / 6.72 / 5.170 日内涨跌幅 / -0.03 / 0.004 / -0.050 / -0.044 / -0.04 / 0.164 政府债券 / 10年期
Yield / 4.65 / 3.25 / 2.87 / 5.03 / 1.72 / 14.58 Basis point change on day / -0.01 / 0.02 / 0.00 / 0.01 / -0.02 World / Commods / FTSE All-World / Oil - Brent / Oil - WT1 / Gold / Silver / Metals (LMEX) Level / 75947 / 88.93 / 80.88 / 4610.02 / 69.35 / 5843.70 % change on day / 0.30 / 0.65 / 0.04 / 0.32 / 1.85 / -0.51
主要股票市场


最大涨跌股


基于富时欧元区300指数成分股 所有数据由洲际交易所(ICE)提供。www.ice.com
Halfords Group / 10.79 Computacenter / 7.86 Atalaya Mining Copper / 4.07 The Sage Grp / 3.81 Oakley Capital Investments / 3.42 PPHE Hotel Group / -6.95 ZIGUP / -5.74 Genuit Group / -4.12 DR.Martens / -3.73 Entain / -3.66
媒体
丹尼尔·托马斯 — 伦敦
新闻评论平台Puck正与美国私募股权集团RedBird Capital进行高级别谈判,拟出售一大笔股权。此次交易将使这家总部位于洛杉矶的数字媒体集团估值约为$250mn。
去年9月,Puck收购了《Air Mail》,这是一家由《名利场》前主编Graydon Carter创办的数字周报。RedBird是Air Mail的早期投资方。
Puck由其创始人及记者与包括TPG、Standard Investments及RIT Capital Partners在内的投资方共同私有。据接近该情况的人士透露,RedBird的投资预计将收购机构投资方的股份。
Puck于2021年由包括Jon Kelly、Joe Purzycki及Max Tcheyan在内的团队创立。
今年1月,数字媒体集团Semafor在1月以$330估值筹资$30。
7月27日-8月27日富时100指数< / td>< / tr><>< rowspan="2">< / ><>指数< / ><>全球< / >< / ><><>10781.75< / ><>10792.54< / >< / table>
日涨跌 0.30% 月 -0.40% 年 25.45% 日 ▶ -1.68% 月 ▶ 4.56% 年 ▶ 7.51%

日涨跌 0.40% 月 2.72% 年 21.36%
<><>公司名称< / ><>事项< / >< / ><><>彼得拉钻石公司< / ><>供股:10股配17股,每股16.5便士,全额缴款截止日为11月21日(或07.11.25)< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="4">跌幅榜< / >< / ><><>英国石油< / ><>5.15< / ><>-6.68< / ><>19.09< / ><>Hunting< / ><>4.13< / ><>-12.78< / ><>11.47< / ><>Rendental Security Inc< / ><>0.08< / ><>-12.94< / ><>-86.85< / >< / ><><>Oil< / ><>5.15< / ><>-4.81< / ><>133.34< / ><>Eugan< / ><>7.25< / ><>-11.17< / ><>18.23< / ><>Enel Energy< / ><>0.04< / ><>-14.95< / ><>-28.65< / >< / ><><>壳牌< / ><>33.11< / ><>-3.75< / ><>20.84< / ><>ZGJGP< / ><>1.26< / ><>-5.95< / ><>13.43< / ><>EnQuest< / ><>0.25< / ><>-9.65< / ><>133.96< / >< / ><><>GBS< / ><>18.52< / ><>-3.57< / ><>1.51< / ><>Harbor Energy< / ><>2.90< / ><>0.81< / ><>26.96< / ><>罗伯特·沃尔特斯< / ><>1.44< / ><>-7.99< / ><>5.68< / >< / ><><>国际石油勘探公司< / ><>18.32< / ><>-3.20< / ><>13.85< / ><>Oklahoma Gas< / ><>5.81< / ><>0.88< / ><>18.73< / ><>医疗物流< / ><>0.11< / ><>-14.66< / ><>34.66< / >< / ><><>BAE系统公司< / ><>20.92< / ><>-2.47< / ><>22.05< / ><>Oreliq集团< / ><>5.12< / ><>-4.48< / ><>15.94< / ><>Capita< / ><>1.11< / ><>-7.08< / ><>-2.19< / >< / ><><>Games Works< / ><>183.20< / ><>-2.29< / ><>-3.17< / ><>Rank集团< / ><>1.05< / ><>-4.01< / ><>6.14< / ><>Fisher(Lamino)父子公司< / ><>4.36< / ><>-6.24< / ><>16.27< / >< / ><><>Oil< / ><>17.20< / ><>-1.63< / ><>2.82< / ><>巴斯夫集团< / ><>1.65< / ><>-3.05< / ><>21.15< / ><>Cerner医疗保健控股公司< / ><>0.63< / ><>-6.15< / ><>-54.86< / >< / ><><>帝亚吉欧< / ><>17.02< / ><>-1.28< / ><>6.11< / ><>辉瑞东道主集团< / ><>15.26< / ><>-3.05< / ><>15.03< / ><>Kemiere资源公司< / ><>1.93< / ><>-6.85< / ><>-21.86< / >< / ><><>沃达丰< / ><>1.17< / ><>-0.76< / ><>18.43< / ><>HCL基础设施< / ><>1.36< / ><>-2.71< / ><>17.01< / ><>Secure Trust Bank< / ><>14.68< / ><>-4.68< / ><>17.31< / >< / table>
过去30天股市走势(以同币种计算的《金融时报》全球500强指数为对比)
富时100
富时EuroFirst
7月27日 - 8月27日< / td><>指数< / ><>全球< / >< / tr><><>标普500< / >< colspan="2">纽约< / >< / table>
<><>国家< / ><>指数< / ><>最新< / ><>前值< / >< / ><><>澳大利亚< / ><>澳证200< / ><>9243.20< / ><>9338.80< / >< / ><><>澳大利亚< / ><>标普澳洲250< / ><>9028.20< / ><>9127.80< / >< / ><><>澳大利亚< / ><>标普澳洲200资源< / ><>8396.90< / ><>9486.00< / >< / ><><>奥地利< / ><>AIX< / ><>6878.23< / ><>6758.44< / >< / ><><>比利时< / ><>BEL 20< / ><>5635.67< / ><>5465.18< / >< / ><><>比利时< / ><>BEL Mid< / ><>6603.08< / ><>6613.48< / >< / ><><>巴西< / ><>博维斯帕< / ><>175105.92< / ><>174586.26< / >< / ><><>加拿大< / ><>标普TSX 60< / ><>2150.75< / ><>2157.82< / >< / ><><>加拿大< / ><>标普TSX综合< / ><>36742.15< / ><>36813.65< / >< / ><><>智利< / ><>标普 / ASX智利S&P 52N< / ><>57452.66< / ><>57148.27< / >< / ><><>中国< / ><>中国TSSE A200< / ><>11708.84< / ><>11618.44< / >< / ><><>< / ><>上证A股< / ><>4148.40< / ><>4102.21< / >< / ><><>< / ><>上证B股< / ><>2905.57< / ><>288.81< / >< / ><><>< / ><>上证综指< / ><>3956.57< / ><>3912.52< / >< / ><><>< / ><>深证A股< / ><>2660.05< / ><>2624.65< / >< / ><><>< / ><>深证B股< / ><>1157.34< / ><>1152.32< / >< / ><><>克罗地亚< / ><>CROEK< / ><>4361.76< / ><>4414.06< / >< / ><><>塞浦路斯< / ><>CSE M&G PEP< / ><>317.24< / ><>317.07< / >< / table>
<><>国家< / ><>指数< / ><>最新< / ><>前值< / >< / ><><>捷克共和国< / ><>捷克PX< / ><>2797.56< / ><>2811.28< / >< / ><><>丹麦< / ><>OMC哥本哈根20< / ><>1634.06< / ><>1648.95< / >< / ><><>埃及< / ><>EDX 30< / ><>55106.50< / >< / ><><>爱沙尼亚< / ><>OMX塔林< / ><>2144.80< / ><>2147.50< / >< / ><><>芬兰< / ><>OMX赫尔辛基20< / ><>13742.79< / ><>13710.48< / >< / ><><>法国< / ><>NOC 640< / ><>8319.87< / ><>8462.39< / >< / ><><>德国< / ><>SDF 120< / ><>6306.20< / ><>6407.38< / >< / ><><>德国< / ><>M-DAX< / ><>32947.28< / ><>32921.35< / >< / ><><>德国< / ><>TecDAX< / ><>4194.52< / ><>4019.10< / >< / ><><>希腊< / ><>XETRA Dex< / ><>2628.74< / ><>26265.72< / >< / ><><>希腊< / ><>雅典< / ><>2867.04< / >< / ><><>希腊< / ><>富时 / 亚洲< / ><>6819.22< / ><>6875.22< / >< / ><><>香港< / ><>恒生指数< / ><>25565.74< / ><>25652.97< / >< / ><><>香港< / ><>恒生企业< / ><>8490.31< / ><>8533.84< / >< / ><><>香港< / ><>恒生红筹< / ><>4239.44< / ><>4249.14< / >< / ><><>匈牙利< / ><>BUX< / ><>14086.52< / ><>15075.00< / >< / ><><>印度< / ><>印度BSE Sensex< / ><>76833.59< / ><>77472.94< / >< / ><><>印度尼西亚< / ><>雅加达综合< / ><>6521.75< / ><>6405.69< / >< / table>
股市:最大涨跌幅
日经指数
活跃股票 / 股票交易量(百万股) / 收盘价 / 日涨跌 ---------- / --------------------- / -------- Nvidia / 167.88 / 228.52 / 18.86 Intel / 62.97 / 30.69 / 2.44 Super Micro Computer / 24.21 / 38.24 / — Palantir / 22.00 / 185.80 / 8.30 Micron Technology / 17.01 / 911.77 / -25.62 Tesla / 15.27 / 352.91 / 7.09 Amazon.com / 15.12 / 256.46 / -3.82 Apple / 14.05 / 314.56 / 1.11 CrowdStrike Hldgs / 13.98 / 220.95 / 31.77 Moderna / 13.72 / 141.38 / —
最大涨跌股 / 收盘价 / 日涨跌
活跃股票 / 股票交易量(百万股) / 收盘价 / 日涨跌 ---------- / --------------------- / -------- Lloyds Big Gp / 135.41 / 1.09 / -0.02 Vodafone / 47.99 / 1.17 / -0.01 BP / 31.10 / 5.15 / -0.07 Barclays / 23.16 / 4.93 / -0.07 Tritax Big Box REIT / 22.70 / 1.58 / -0.01 Marks & Spencer / 21.89 / 3.91 / -0.03 Rolls-Royce / 21.37 / 15.30 / -0.13 Legal & General / 19.92 / 2.91 / — Haleon / 17.91 / 3.68 / -0.04 Glencore / 17.70 / 5.95 / -0.04
最大涨跌股 / 收盘价 / 日涨跌
Intesa Sanpaolo / 42.93 / 6.74 / -0.12 Stellantis / 34.43 / 4.58 / 0.12 Enel / 20.09 / 9.37 / -0.14 Banco De Sabadell / 14.99 / 3.61 / — Banco Santander / 13.93 / 12.54 / -0.17 Royal KPN / 11.69 / 4.08 / -0.02 Nokia / 10.92 / 9.00 / 0.18 Credit Agricole / 10.04 / 18.25 / -0.76 Orange / 9.63 / 15.10 / -0.66 Telefonica / 9.12 / 3.60 / -0.01
爱尔兰 / ISED综合指数 / 14191.46 / 14374.87 以色列 / 特拉维夫125指数 / 4084.17 / 4042.96 意大利 / FTSE意大利综合指数 / 54804.95 / 55266.15 意大利 / FTSE意大利中盘股指数 / 61711.85 / 61842.58 意大利 / FTSE标普500指数 / 52265.13 / 53802.25 日本 / 日经225指数 / 68131.98 / 66292.16 日本 / 东京指数 / 4111.22 / 4111.02 科威特 / KXK市场指数 / 9144.67 拉脱维亚 / OMX里加指数 / 350.88 / 350.24 立陶宛 / OMX
卢森堡 / Lux / 1985.01 / 1977.09 墨西哥 / 墨西哥城 IPC 指数 / 66138.28 / 66191.11 马来西亚 / 富时布尔萨 KLD 指数 / 1741.72 / 1748.54 摩洛哥 / MASI 指数 / 19548.92 / 19124.18 荷兰 / AEX 指数 / 1103.38 / 1107.76 荷兰 / AEIA 综合指数 / 1489.46 / 1507.52 新西兰 / NZX 50 指数 / 13860.05 / 14013.21 尼日利亚 / 证券交易所综合指数 / 239158.09 / 238682.92
日 ▷ -1.17% 月 ▷ 0.48% 年 ▷ 23.50%
恒生指数
日本电信电话 / 165.34 / 168.20 / -1.40 软银集团 / 63.87 / 237.50 / -2.00 富士电机 / 54.89 / 5500.00 / 195.00 日产汽车 / 42.64 / 312.00 / -6.50 软银集团 / 32.88 / 5200.00 / 37.00 东京电力控股 / 32.77 / 529.50 / -8.80 太阳诱电 / 31.46 / 8900.00 / -160.00 三菱日联金融集团 / 28.82 / 3608.00 / 29.00 古河电工 / 27.68 / 4089.00 / 164.00 村田制作所 / 23.95 / 7309.00 / 124.00 穆尔塔制造 / 4 / 189.88 / 9.86
公司名称 / 价格 / 涨跌 / 涨跌幅 / % | 上涨股 | SAP / 189.88 / 9.86 / 5.48 宝马 / 59.94 / 2.26 / 3.92 英飞凌科技 / 57.17 / 1.98 / 3.59 大众优先股 / 75.00 / 2.58 / 3.56 大众 / 76.10 / 2.55 / 3.47 | 下跌股 | 法国兴业银行 / 71.03 / -3.73 / -4.99 法国巴黎银行 / 100.66 / -5.06 / -4.79 保乐力加 / 64.50 / -3.10 / -4.59 法国电信 / 15.10 / -0.86 / -4.19 法国农业信贷银行 / 18.25 / -0.76 / -3.97
国家 / 指数 / 最新 / 之前 挪威 / 奥斯陆综合指数 / 2476.80 / 2479.48 巴基斯坦 / KSE 100 指数 / 177322.77 / 177370.71 菲律宾 / 马尼拉综合指数 / 6804.58 / 6137.23 波兰 / Wig 指数 / 130504.38 / 135418.20 葡萄牙 / P3 20 指数 / 9389.24 / 9445.39 葡萄牙 / PSI 综合指数 / 6365.01 / 6410.86 罗马尼亚 / 罗马尼亚 BET 指数 / 35457.73 / 35896.58 俄罗斯 / 俄罗斯美元交易指数 / 988.10 沙特阿拉伯 / 塔达沃尔综合指数 / 11237.93 / 11259.90 新加坡 / 富时海峡时报指数
Times / 5688.12 / 5721.59 斯洛伐克 / SAL 20 / 325.90 / 325.80 斯洛文尼亚 / SIB TOP / 3312.73 / 3191.95 南非 / FTSE / JSE All Share / 116806.24 / 116813.45 南非 / FTSE / JSE Res / 75324.43 / 75680.77 南非 / FTSE / JSE Top 40 / 159323.09 / 159497.56 韩国 / Korea / 6912.27 / 6938.21 韩国 / Koqo 200 / 1088.61 / 1071.16 西班牙 / Spain BEX 35 / 19881.81 / 20067.30
| 上涨股 | | | | Halfords Group / 2.67 / 0.26 / 10.79 Computacenter / 56.25 / 4.10 / 7.86 Atalaya Mining Copper / 11.00 / 0.43 / 4.07 The Sage Grp / 11.04 / 0.41 / 3.81 Oakley Capital Investments / 5.44 / 0.18 / 3.42 | 下跌股 | | | | PPHE Hotel Group / 15.26 / -1.14 / -6.95 ZOGUP / 4.35 / -0.27 / -5.74 Genuit Group / 2.80 / -0.12 / -4.12 DRI Martens / 0.77 / -0.03 / -3.73 Estein / 5.11 / -0.19 / -3.66
英国市场赢家与输家 / 价格 / 涨跌额 / 涨跌幅 / % | 上涨股 | | | | Salesforce Inc / 248.58 / 42.95 / 20.89 CrowdStrike Hldgs / 220.95 / 31.77 / 16.79 Palo Alto Networks / 379.00 / 39.70 / 11.70 Synopsys / 455.98 / 45.98 / 11.21 Nvidia / 228.52 / 18.85 / 9.00 | 下跌股 | | | | HP Inc / 28.98 / -1.53 / -5.03 Western Digital / 449.86 / -19.02 / -4.05 Best Buy / 84.00 / -3.44 / -3.93 Dollar Tree / 127.22 / -4.96 / -3.76 Micron Technology / 911.77 / -26.62 / -2.64
日本市场赢家与输家 / 价格 / 涨跌额 / 涨跌幅 / % Furukawa Electric / 4089.00 / 184.00 / 4.71 Fujikura / 5500.00 / 195.00 / 3.68 Mitsubishi Chemical / 1171.00 / 39.00 / 3.45 IHI / 2720.00 / 82.00 / 3.11 Kuraray Co / 1828.00 / 47.00 / 2.64 Advantest / 34610.00 / -1090.00 / -3.05 Ebara / 4821.00 / -138.00 / -2.78 Yamaha Motor / 1906.50 / -48.50 / -2.48 Dentsu Group / 3535.00 / -83.00 / -2.29 Konami Group / 21735.00 / -505.00 / -2.27
| Winners | | | | Computacenter / 56.25 / 11.50 / 91.98 Antofagasta / 40.39 / 8.99 / 23.18 JCI Sports Fashion / 0.86 / 7.94 / 2.34 IG Group / 13.94 / 7.07 / 6.01 Anglo American / 42.43 / 6.98 / 37.54 Melrose Ind / 5.09 / 6.87 / -13.49 Halma / 36.72 / 5.64 / 3.79 Endeavour / 47.39 / 5.40 / 22.39 Lon Stock Ex / 89.80 / 5.13 / 0.31 Lion Finance / 133.60 / 4.62 / 43.66
英镑 / 美元
日 1.13% 月 2.55% 年 4.11%
Sweden / DMX Stockholm 30 / 3321.44 / 3326.34 Sweden / DMX Stockholm AS / 1151.01 / 1148.74 Switzerland / SNI Index / 14384.37 / 14542.90 Taiwan / Weighted Stock Index / 45875.22 / 45832.62 Thailand / Bovespa & S1 / 1900.78 / 1865.10 Turkey / BIST 100 / 14575.51 / 14610.92 UK / FTSE 100 / 10792.54 / 10878.12 UK / FTSE 4Good / 9386.55 / 9458.01 FTSE All Share / 5826.09 / 5866.59 FTSE Non-MAX 100 / 9698.04 / 9505.20 U.S.A. / DJ US Composite / 16934.98 / 16944.60 U.S.A. / DJ Jones Industrial / 53676.08 / 53483.88 U.S.A. / DJ Jones Transport / 21524.22 / 21583.06 U.S.A. / DJ Jones Utilities / 425.47 / 428.24 U.S.A. / Nasdaq 100 / 29483.15 / 29224.52 U.S.A. / Nasdaq Composite / 26474.25 / 26130.20 U.S.A. / NYSE Composite / 24633.37 / 24142.07 U.S.A. / S&P 500 / 7737.99 / 7675.70
FTSE 250 / 价格(英镑) / 周涨跌% / 年涨跌% | Winners | | | | Gamma Communications / 11.56 / 18.24 / 25.11 Atalaya Mining Copper / 11.00 / 17.08 / 28.66 Halfords Group / 2.67 / 14.35 / 89.63 Vistry Group / 3.03 / 13.74 / -52.76 Hochschild Mining / 6.72 / 12.48 / 30.96 Oxford Nanopore Technologies / 1.81 / 10.15 / 41.12 ME Group / 1.28 / 8.29 / -15.23 Domino's Pizza / 2.11 / 8.00 / 21.45 International Workplace Gp / 1.89 / 7.59 / -18.54 Hays / 0.73 / 7.50 / 29.94
日 ▷ -0.70% 月 ▷ 0.13% 年 ▷ -3.93%
委内瑞拉 / IBC / 5702.51 / 5690.10 越南 / 越南指数 / 1831.56 / 1821.32 跨境 / 欧元 Stoxx 50(欧元) / 6424.73 / 6470.74 荷兰 / Eurofirst 100(德) / 1912.90 / 1937.01 跨境 / FTSE 4Good Global(美元) / 21527.12 / 21354.07 跨境 / FTSE All World(美元) / 760.79 / 757.17 跨境 / 50 / 2602.39 / 2621.97 跨境 / E300 / 2602.39 / 2621.97 跨境 / Eurotop 100 / 9030.15 / 9073.84 跨境 / Global 100(美元) / 5771.56 / 5711.87 跨境 / Gold Min(美元) / 8589.94 跨境 / Latibex Tap(欧元) / 8118.10 / 6134.70 跨境 / World(美元) / 1420.82 / 1413.55 跨境 / FTSEurofirst 100(欧元) / 7195.46 / 7252.36 跨境 / FTSEurofirst 80(欧元) / 8733.25 / 8796.98

FTSE小型股指数 / 价格(英镑) / 周涨跌幅(%) / 年初至今涨跌幅(%) ---------------- / ----------- / ------------- / ------------------- | 赢家 | | | | Geiger Counter / 0.72 / 16.13 / 20.00 PensionBee Group / 1.36 / 8.33 / -15.74 PureTech Health / 1.26 / 7.98 / 0.80 ASOS / 4.17 / 7.19 / 47.27 M J Gleason / 2.77 / 6.13 / -34.05 Essentra / 1.11 / 5.89 / 15.32 C&C Group / 0.95 / 5.64 / -29.26 Dialight / 5.66 / 4.81 / 61.71 DFS Furniture / 1.85 / 4.76 / -5.17 Baring Emerging Europe / 9.00 / 4.65 / 15.02
货币
行业板块 / 价格(欧元) / 周涨跌幅(%) / 年初至今涨跌幅(%) ---------- / ----------- / ------------- / ------------------- | 赢家 | | | | 金融与信贷服务 / 14422.01 / 4.89 / -0.41 贵金属与矿业 / 38868.71 / 4.76 / 12.58 电子与电气设备 / 15105.91 / 4.26 / 18.49 工业金属与矿业 / 10088.71 / 4.23 / 35.96 生物技术 / 21903.53 / 4.19 / -0.59 基础材料 / 11142.88 / 4.13 / 32.54 房地产投资与服务 / 2062.53 / 3.35 / -3.70 家庭用品与家居护理 / 8709.69 / 3.27 / -19.25 软件与计算机服务 / 1945.36 / 3.19 / -4.73 技术 / 1702.58 / 3.16 / -4.48
8月27日 / CLONDAR / 欧元 / 英镑 --------- / ------ 收盘中间价 / 当日变动 / CLONDAR / 欧元 / 英镑 阿根廷比索 / 1514.1764 / -0.0629 / 13.9504 / 1783.4298 / 32.4845 / 2056.6301 / -0.9939 巴西雷亚尔 / 1.3570 / -0.0052 / -0.0133 / 1.6104 / -0.0059 / 1.8885 / -0.0077 巴林第纳尔 / 0.3770 / 0.4380 / 0.0036 / 0.5211 玻利维亚玻利维亚诺 / 11.1700 / -0.1100 / 0.1610 / 13.8724 / -0.0620 / 15.9501 / -0.1295 巴西圣多美和普林西比多布拉 / 5.1750 / 0.0086 / -0.0190 / 6.1183 / 0.1383 / 8.0584 / 0.0844 加拿大元 / 1.3861 / -0.0021 / 0.0390 / 1.6142 / -0.0036 / -0.0041 / 1.8050 / -0.0050 智利比索 / 921.8080 / 113.6380 / 11.6920 / 1085.5158 / 22.2710 / 211.2963 / 21.5494 人民币 / 6.7199 / -0.0251 / 7.8351 / 0.0246 / 9.1273 / 0.0085
巴西雷亚尔 / 452.2400 / 1.2230 / 1.2250 / 5.0984 / 1.7031 / 5.9296 / 4.4194 捷克克朗 / 23.1414 / -0.2812 / 24.1240 / -0.1280 / 33.1553 / -0.2567 哥伦比亚比索 / 6.4140 / -0.0012 / 0.0018 / 5.7974 / -0.0013 / 7.1175 / -0.0035 埃及镑 / 50.2700 / 0.3700 / 58.5211 / 0.9049 / 56.8623 / 0.8144 港元 / 7.8394 / 0.0007 / 0.0037 / 9.1397 / 0.0017 / -0.0038 / 10.6479 / -0.0038
当日变动 / 收盘中间价 / 当日 / 周 / 当日变动 / 当日 / 周 / 收盘中间价 / 当日 / 周 14.2930 / 印度尼西亚房地产 / 17720.0000 / 20.0000 / -22.5000 / 2836.7210 / 1271.9110 / 24068.1910 / 15.5450 / -119.2730 -0.0251 / 以色列群岛 / 2.9600 / -0.0100 / -0.0302 / 2.4540 / -0.0156 / -0.0461 / -0.0241 / -0.0251 / -0.0500 -0.0000 / 日元 / 159.3300 / -0.0800 / 0.6000 / 185.5441 / -0.0952 / 0.1026 / 216.3964 / -0.2543 / 0.0213 -0.1296 / 邦彦分行 / 129.4000 / 0.0000 / 150.6900 / 1.2294 / 175.7576 / 0.8088 -0.0027 / 科威特第纳尔 / 0.3088 / 0.0000 / 0.3200 / -0.0003 / -0.0004 / -0.0003 -0.0340 / 马来西亚林吉特 / 4.6330 / 0.0070 / -0.0110 / 4.8968 / -0.0261 / 5.4779 / 0.0072 / -0.0051 -0.0000 / 摩洛哥比索 / 4.5255 / -0.0025 / -0.0179 / 19.7629 / -0.0450 / -0.0502 / -0.0158 / -0.0051 0.0080 / 新西兰元 / 1.6914 / -0.0037 / 1.0011 / 1.9567 / -0.0042 / -0.0050 / 2.2837 / -0.0060 / -0.0069 99.3887 / 尼日利亚奈拉 / 1045.0750 / -21.7300 / 1560.6155 / -12.3686 / 1803.1573 / -21.0304 -0.0000 / 秘鲁马来亚 / 9.3525 / -0.0250 / -0.1879 / 10.8179 / -0.0231 / -0.0318 / 12.8731 / -0.0251 -0.2507 / 巴基斯坦
卢比 / 277.4250 / -0.3000 / -0.0500 / 323.0882 / -0.3355 / -0.3987 / 376.8712 / -0.5742 / -1.4553 / < / td>< / tr> -0.0000< / ><>菲律宾太阳< / ><>2.3020< / ><>-0.0250< / ><>-0.0323< / ><>3.3949< / ><>0.0062< / ><>1.8947< / ><>-0.0047< / ><>< / >< / ><><>0.8144< / ><>菲律宾< / ><>61.8875< / ><>0.2250< / ><>72.0883< / ><>1.9176< / ><>84.0525< / ><>0.2887< / ><>-0.0305< / ><>< / >< / ><><>-0.0443< / ><>波兰兹罗提< / ><>3.7251< / ><>-0.0005< / ><>4.3347< / ><>0.0348< / ><>5.0655< / ><>0.0225< / ><>< / >< / ><><>-0.0000< / ><>秘鲁< / ><>4.5510< / ><>-0.0250< / ><>5.2998< / ><>0.0103< / ><>1.2918< / ><>-0.0001< / ><>< / >< / ><><>-0.7553< / ><>俄罗斯卢布< / ><>99.4500< / ><>3.8000< / ><>100.6214< / ><>5.2101< / ><>117.3529< / ><>5.6776< / ><>< / >< / table>
富时行业板块:领涨与垫底
<>< colspan="2">年初至今涨跌幅(%)< / >< / ><><>科技硬件与设备< / ><>94.71< / >< / ><><>新能源< / ><>89.77< / >< / ><><>工业金属与矿业< / ><>35.36< / >< / ><><>非寿险< / ><>32.68< / >< / ><><>医疗保健服务商< / ><>32.58< / >< / ><><>基础材料< / ><>32.54< / >< / ><><>航空航天与国防< / ><>25.55< / >< / ><><>能源< / ><>20.23< / >< / ><><>油气煤炭< / ><>29.14< / >< / ><><>电子电气设备< / ><>18.49< / >< / ><><>银行< / ><>17.89< / >< / ><><>工业< / ><>16.87< / >< / ><><>电信服务提供商< / ><>15.26< / >< / ><><>电信< / ><>15.20< / >< / ><><>建筑与材料< / ><>14.56< / >< / ><><>综合工业< / ><>14.33< / >< / ><><>化工< / ><>13.52< / >< / ><><>金融与保险公司< / ><>13.73< / >< / ><><>金融< / ><>12.90< / >< / table>
富时全球指数
<>< rowspan="2">8月27日< / >< colspan="3">美元< / >< colspan="3">欧元< / >< colspan="3">英镑< / >< / ><><>收盘中间价< / ><>日内变动< / ><>周内变动< / >< / ><><>沙特里亚尔< / ><>3.7546< / ><>2< / ><>-0.0001< / ><>4.3726< / ><>0.0002< / ><>-0.0147< / ><>5.0957< / ><>-0.0022< / ><>-0.0189< / >< / ><><>新加坡元< / ><>1.2713< / ><>-0.0003< / ><>1.4906< / ><>-0.0006< / ><>-0.0051< / ><>1.7584< / ><>-0.0017< / ><>-0.0071< / >< / ><><>泰铢< / ><>0.6886< / ><>0.0290< / ><>--< / ><>1.6320< / ><>0.0342< / ><>--< / ><>1.7201< / ><>-0.0177< / ><>-0.1131< / >< / ><><>韩元< / ><>1305.6000< / ><>-4.1000< / ><>-12.5000< / ><>1697.8468< / ><>-30.3738< / ><>1875.2000< / ><>-6.3987< / ><>-23.3302< / >< / ><><>斯里兰卡卢比< / ><>5.5102< / ><>-0.0177< / ><>-0.0041< / ><>11.0651< / ><>-0.0201< / ><>-0.0042< / ><>11.9295< / ><>-0.0291< / ><>-0.0032< / >< / ><><>瑞士法郎< / ><>8.8038< / ><>-0.0024< / ><>-0.0003< / ><>9.5902< / ><>-0.0027< / ><>-0.0032< / ><>13.0916< / ><>-0.0037< / ><>-0.0032< / >< / ><><>台币< / ><>31.5605< / ><>-0.7255< / ><>-0.3456< / ><>36.8951< / ><>-0.3038< / ><>43.0301< / ><>-0.2252< / ><>-0.5735< / >< / ><><>泰铢< / ><>32.8785< / ><>0.1275< / ><>0.0052< / ><>38.3928< / ><>0.1501< / ><>0.0052< / ><>44.6894< / ><>0.1525< / ><>-0.1168< / >< / ><><>突尼斯第
科威特第纳尔 / 2.9019 / -0.0221 / 3.3798 / 0.0021 / -0.0021 / 3.9415 / -0.0117 土耳其里拉 / 48.1350 / 0.4340 / -0.4240 / 58.5931 / 0.9471 / 2.9417 / 65.3794 / 0.8742 阿联酋迪拉姆 / 3.8275 / -0.0003 / -- / 4.2714 / -- / 4.9166 / -0.0024 / -0.0184 英镑 / 0.7262 / 0.0003 / -0.0027 / 0.8575 / 0.0004 / -0.0004 / 1.0005 / -- 美元 / 1.0000 / 1.1645 / -0.0037 / 1.2622 / -0.0036 / -0.0035 瑞士法郎 / 260.0000 / -60.0000 / 302.9319 / 178.5961 / 1,643.1500 / 81.9140 欧元 / 0.8597 / -0.0028 / 1.0003 / -- / 1.1683 / -0.0005
8月26日 地区与国家 / 股票数量 / 美元指数 / 日涨跌幅 / 月涨跌幅 / 年初至今涨跌幅 / 年初至今涨跌点 / 评级机构评级涨跌点 / 总股息收益率 ------------------- / ---------- / ---------------- / --------------------- / -------------- | FTSE全球指数 | | | | | | | | | 美国 / 10115 / 12698.60 / 5.05 / 4.13 / 13.38 / 2192.16 / 14.73 / 1.59 全球大盘股 / 1870 / 11868.65 / -0.05 / 4.24 / 12.76 / 2158.39 / 14.00 / 1.50 全球中盘股 / 2294 / 11901.30 / -1.30 / 4.24 / 12.76 / 2158.39 / 14.00 / 1.85 全球小盘股 / 5851 / 14274.23 / 0.24 / 4.46 / 14.68 / 2283.49 / 16.00 / 1.71 全球(欧洲区域除外) / 8501 / 13448.88 / 0.06 / 4.08 / 13.60 / 2282.29 / 14.94 / 1.50 全球(美国除外) / 8564 / 8351.12 / -0.14 / 4.95 / 14.83 / 2063.68 / 17.01 / 2.39 全球(日本除外) / 8759 / 13237.33 / 0.03 / 4.08 / 13.11 / 2039.88 / 14.45 / 1.57 全球(中盘股) / 9884 / 13077.07 / 0.01 / 4.95 / 14.83 / 2063.68 / 17.01 / 14.77 | FTSE区域指数 | | | | | | | | | 亚太地区 / 1980 / 17521.16 / -0.05 / 3.68 / 12.59 / 2752.93 / 13.49 / 1.19 亚太地区(日本除外) / 8323 / 9308.98 / 0.58 / 5.43 / 18.54 / 1670.61 / 21.21 / 1.96 4857 / 17418.70 / 0.25 / 4.59 / 18.54 / 1730.58 / 21.68 / 1.98 欧洲 / 1452 / 1233.36 / -0.20 / 4.34 / 10.27 / 1565.30 / 13.04 / 2.77 欧洲(英国除外) / 1221 / 836.99 / -0.15 / 4.59 / 10.08 / 1738.78 / 2.31 / 2.88 日本 / 614 / 534.32 / -0.05 / 4.59 / 10.08 / 1698.87 / 2.89 | AIG发达国家指数 | | | | | | | | | 发达国家 / 3359 / 17317.87 / -0.02 / 4.05 / 13.66 / 2248.40 / 14.50 / 1.50 发达国家(北美除外) / 3508 / 787.99 / 0.03 / 4.80 / 16.50 / 1587.22 / 18.86 / 2.44 发达国家(欧洲区域除外) / 2 / 5851 / 14274.23 / 0.24 / 4.46 / 14.68 / 2283.49 / 16.00 / 1.71
8月26日 1月 / 股票数量 / 美元指数 / 日涨跌幅 / 月涨跌幅 / 年初至今涨跌幅 / 美元年初至今涨跌点 / 总股息收益率 ------------- / ---------- / ---------------- / --------------------- / -------------- 12月26日 1月 / 10115 / 12698.60 / -0.05 / 4.13 / 13.38 / 2192.16 / 14.73
数字信息服务< / td>< / tr> <><>电信与计算机服务< / ><>3527.49< / ><>-0.01< / ><>14.00< / ><>-1.75< / ><>-6293.14< / ><>-1.32< / ><>0.57< / >< / > <><>媒体< / ><>183845.52< / ><>-0.93< / ><>12.29< / ><>-7.35< / ><>-1212.49< / ><>-6.74< / ><>0.93< / >< / > <>< colspan="8">科技< / >< / > <><>智能手机< / ><>283810.08< / ><>-0.21< / ><>-0.23< / ><>39.49< / ><>851.87< / ><>39.93< / ><>0.57< / >< / > <><>科技硬件与设备< / ><>8836769.82< / ><>0.35< / ><>-1.16< / ><>26.92< / ><>9576.94< / ><>40.03< / ><>0.56< / >< / > <><>科技< / ><>12314833.63< / ><>0.21< / ><>4.11< / ><>20.28< / ><>8331.86< / ><>20.76< / ><>0.57< / >< / > <><>消费品< / ><>123< / ><>100.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.00< / ><>121.24< / ><>-0.00< / ><>0.00< / >< / > <><>电信设备< / ><>114565.23< / ><>1.91< / ><>8.14< / ><>68.07< / ><>8533.03< / ><>70.16< / ><>0.78< / >< / > <><>电信< / ><>255927.65< / ><>-0.05< / ><>-0.00< / ><>182.21< / ><>-0.00< / ><>0.00< / >< / > <><>电信服务提供商< / ><>145454.31< / ><>-0.18< / ><>5.65< / ><>3.61< / ><>1013.80< / ><>8.47< / ><>3.54< / >< / > <><>电子与电气设备< / ><>344217.17< / ><>0.68< / ><>4.13< / ><>24.63< / ><>3067.28< / ><>25.63< / ><>0.98< / >< / > <>< colspan="8">金融< / >< / > <><>金融与信贷服务< / ><>112939.34< / ><>-0.10< / ><>4.91< / ><>-5.21< / ><>1471.99< / ><>-4.09< / ><>1.50< / >< / > <><>金融< / ><>1154736.20< / ><>0.16< / ><>2.61< / ><>11.41< / ><>1324.56< / ><>13.90< / ><>2.71< / >< / > <><>房主与租赁< / ><>113183.59< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.00< / ><>1383.15< / ><>-0.00< / ><>0.00< / >< / > <><>银行< / ><>489539.03< / ><>-0.30< / ><>2.02< / ><>15.74< / ><>1257.13< / ><>18.73< / ><>3.21< / >< / > <><>其他保险投资与保险服务< / ><>9103.03< / ><>-0.01< / ><>-0.00< / ><>103.03< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.00< / >< / > <><>非寿险< / ><>1251104.45< / ><>0.26< / ><>1.44< / ><>6.88< / ><>1591.21< / ><>8.64< / ><>2.63< / >< / > <><>投资银行与借贷集团< / ><>3441244.13< / ><>-0.23< / ><>4.79< / ><>7.71< / ><>2084.02< / ><>9.06< / ><>1.58< / >< / > <><>房地产与商业服务< / ><>56152.75< / ><>-0.13< / ><>8.54< / ><>2.41< / ><>160.25< / ><>3.07< / ><>0.90< / >< / > <>< colspan="8">房地产< / >< / > <><>房地产< / ><>648983.24< / ><>-0.39< / ><>-0.85< / ><>5.55< / ><>1175.50< / ><>8.07< / ><>3.65< / >< / > <><>房地产与商业服务< / ><>56152.75< / ><>-0.13< / ><>8.54< / ><>2.41< / ><>160.25< / ><>3.07< / ><>0.90< / >< / > <><>房地产投资信托< / ><>319772.38< / ><>-0.48< / ><>-2.33< / ><>9.91< / ><>1568.57< / ><>12.65< / ><>3.98< / >< / > <>< colspan="8">数字信息与服务< / >< / > < / table>
330.07< / td> -0.65< / ><>4.76< / ><>-1.43< / ><>324.49< / ><>-1.22< / ><>0.34< / >< / tr> <>可选消费< / ><>1513 125.89< / ><>-0.48< / ><>6.47< / ><>-2.14< / ><>1778.53< / ><>-1.36< / ><>1.18< / >< / ><><>必需消费< / ><>1513 125.89< / ><>-0.48< / ><>6.47< / ><>-2.14< / ><>1778.53< / ><>-1.36< / ><>1.18< / >< / ><><>必需消费< / ><>821 101.96< / ><>-0.12< / ><>2.00< / ><>6.69< / ><>1883.97< / ><>-0.92< / ><>0.92< / >< / ><><>零售商< / ><>267 197.71< / ><>-0.35< / ><>5.63< / ><>4.38< / ><>2721.09< / ><>4.94< / ><>0.80< / >< / ><><>消费品与药店< / ><>1513 125.89< / ><>-0.48< / ><>6.47< / ><>-2.14< / ><>1778.53< / ><>-1.36< / ><>1.18< / >< / ><><>个人用品< / ><>141
821.00< / ><>-0.18< / ><>1.62< / ><>-10.97< / ><>1271.77< / ><>-9.83< / ><>2.03< / >< / ><><>个人护理< / ><>1552 125.89< / ><>-0.48< / ><>6.47< / ><>-10.97< / ><>1271.77< / ><>-9.83< / ><>2.03< / >< / ><><>旅游休闲< / ><>296 126.09< / ><>-0.47< / ><>6.14< / ><>1.38< / ><>1807.07< / ><>2.41< / ><>1.54< / >< / table>
数据由ICE提供。www.ice.com 所列价格仅供参考,且在出版时被认为准确。ICE或《金融时报》不做任何要约。金融时报不保证所提供信息的可靠性或完整性,亦不对因依赖或使用该信息而产生的任何损失承担责任。 如需进一步信息,请联系newspapers@ice.com
<><>2.58< / ><>金融与信贷服务< / ><>-0.41< / >< / ><><>2.44< / ><>生物技术< / ><>-0.59< / >< / ><><>1.23< / ><>必需消费< / ><>-1.21< / >< / ><><>8.75< / ><>个人用品< / ><>-2.48< / >< / ><><>8.45< / ><>个人护理、药品与肿瘤学< / ><>-3.11< / >< / ><><>8.00< / ><>房地产投资与服务< / ><>-3.70< / >< / ><><>6.92< / ><>休闲用品< / ><>-3.82< / >< / ><><>6.11< / ><>科技< / ><>-4.48< / >< / ><><>5.62< / ><>软件与计算机服务< / ><>-4.73< / >< / ><><>5.55< / ><>消费者服务< / ><>-5.07< / >< / ><><>4.38< / ><>烟草< / ><>-5.16< / >< / ><><>4.00< / ><>制药与生物技术< / ><>-7.68< / >< / ><><>2.86< / ><>医疗保健< / ><>-7.70< / >< / ><><>2.62< / ><>医疗设备与服务< / ><>-10.85< / >< / ><><>2.30< / ><>家居用品与家庭建材< / ><>-19.25< / >< / ><><>1.80< / ><>汽车与零部件< / ><>-40.31< / >< / table>
<><>股票平均数< / ><>指数< / ><>美元< / ><>日内变动< / ><>月度环比< / ><>季度环比< / ><>年初至今涨跌幅< / ><>股息率< / >< / ><><>地区与国家< / ><>< / >< / ><><>新兴欧洲< / ><>5150< / ><>102.01< / ><>0.01< / ><>4.98< / ><>13.76< / ><>-2.43< / ><>270.31< / ><>1.48< / ><>2.40< / >< / ><><>发达市场(除欧洲)< / ><>4166< / ><>1537.48< / ><>0.01< / ><>4.00< / ><>14.36< / ><>24.368< / ><>15.35< / ><>1.27< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>发达市场(除欧元区)< / ><>4781< / ><>1489.05< / ><>-0.02< / ><>4.00< / ><>13.94< / ><>233.08< / ><>15.10< / ><>1.39< / >< / >
Japan< / td> 3068< / ><>140.00< / ><>0.01< / ><>4.00< / ><>13.00< / ><>23.00< / ><>15.00< / ><>1.30< / ><>...< / >< / tr> <>Developed ex UK< / ><>5128< / ><>1436.67< / ><>0.01< / ><>4.07< / ><>13.77< / ><>234.12< / ><>15.06< / ><>1.44< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Developed ex Europe< / ><>4033< / ><>138.05< / ><>-0.05< / ><>4.00< / ><>13.00< / ><>23.00< / ><>15.00< / ><>1.40< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Developed Asia Pacific< / ><>2318< / ><>859.37< / ><>1.33< / ><>5.82< / ><>26.26< / ><>1541.17< / ><>27.97< / ><>2.03< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Developed ex Japan< / ><>3822< / ><>146.96< / ><>0.36< / ><>5.82< / ><>26.00< / ><>1540.88< / ><>27.96< / ><>2.03< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Developed ex Japan< / ><>1193< / ><>740.69< / ><>-0.22< / ><>4.30< / ><>10.01< / ><>1505.79< / ><>128.83< / ><>2.37< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Developed ex UK< / ><>982< / ><>809.14< / ><>-0.16< / ><>4.54< / ><>9.80< / ><>1802.47< / ><>12.63< / ><>2.69< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Developed ex Europe< / ><>362< / ><>136.96< / ><>0.36< / ><>4.54< / ><>9.80< / ><>1802.47< / ><>12.63< / ><>2.69< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Developed Asia Pac< / ><>3511< / ><>189.88< / ><>0.02< / ><>4.96< / ><>16.49< / ><>1530.00< / ><>18.88< / ><>2.45< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Emerging Pacific< / ><>4766< / ><>1102.15< / ><>0.71< / ><>4.88< / ><>10.96< / ><>2135.58< / ><>12.90< / ><>2.37< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Emerging Europe< / ><>4025< / ><>1256.24< / ><>-0.91< / ><>4.88< / ><>10.96< / ><>2135.58< / ><>12.90< / ><>2.37< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Emerging Japan< / ><>259< / ><>379.94< / ><>0.52< / ><>6.56< / ><>23.96< / ><>862.72< / ><>25.74< / ><>2.48< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Emerging Europe< / ><>36< / ><>4802.56< / ><>1.16< / ><>11.82< / ><>28.59< / ><>6681.78< / ><>31.45< / ><>2.74< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Emerging Japan< / ><>155< / ><>337.57< / ><>0.17< / ><>6.56< / ><>23.96< / ><>6681.78< / ><>31.45< / ><>2.74< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Emerging Plus Korea / Poland< / ><>2721< / ><>5235.29< / ><>0.72< / ><>6.11< / ><>30.58< / ><>9686.65< / ><>32.65< / ><>2.05< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Emerging Europe< / ><>1231< / ><>510.07< / ><>1.07< / ><>6.11< / ><>30.58< / ><>9686.65< / ><>32.65< / ><>2.05< / ><>...< / >< / ><><>Secondary Energy< / ><>3025< / ><>10272.73< / ><>0.37< / ><>3.81< / ><>-7.03< / ><>1818.50< / ><>-5.44< / ><>2.24< / ><>...< / >< / table>
FTSE 100 SUMMARY
<><>Aug 26 Sector< / ><>No of stocks< / ><>Index< / ><>Day's chg%< / ><>Month chg%< / ><>YTD %< / ><>US $'s'001< / ><>US $'s'002< / ><>YTD % < / ><>Div Yield< / >< / ><><>Holding Goods & Home Construction< / ><>122< / ><>543.37< / ><>-0.36< / ><>4.71< / ><>1.20< / ><>933.43< / ><>2.63< / ><>2.20< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Health Care< / ><>15< / ><>180.69< / ><>0.79< / ><>1.11< / ><>1.46< / ><>1,463.85< / ><>1.43< / ><>1.40< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Health Care< / ><>851< / ><>1214.68< / ><>-0.84< / ><>1.82< / ><>9.51< / ><>1821.05< / ><>10.85< / ><>1.57< / ><>-< / >< / >
医药与生物技术 / 523 / 1078.18 / -1.21 / 8.72 / 15.19 / 1875.85 / 16.99 / 1.77 / - 医药与生物技术 / 118 / 111.60 / -0.37 / 10.04 / -5.74 / 2878.09 / -6.11 / 0.88 / - | 农业、食品与饮料 | | | | | | | | | | | 食品生产商 / 306 / 661.03 / -0.86 / 2.70 / 4.98 / 1185.85 / 7.65 / 3.11 / - 食品生产商 / 104 / 989.94 / -1.70 / 5.05 / 12.38 / 1593.57 / 14.37 / 1.97 / - | 能源 | | | | | | | | | | | 能源 / 373 / 697.06 / -0.06 / 2.48 / 30.29 / 1510.37 / 33.11 / 3.00 / - 电力 / 246 / 522.87 / -0.11 / 1.00 / 1.87 / 581.07 / 1.00 / 0.90 / - 可再生能源 / 88 / 99.74 / -0.57 / -1.70 / 7.91 / 124.23 / 9.94 / 3.53 / - 工业能源 / 67 / 426.05 / -0.69 / 1.00 / 1.67 / 547.41 / 1.38 / 3.38 / - 石油与天然气 / 306 / 721.43 / -0.03 / 2.42 / 31.61 / 1627.68 / 34.65 / 3.14 / - 燃气、水务与多元公用事业 / 117 / 717.64 / 0.16 / -3.27 / 5.58 / 1810.25 / 8.27 / 3.54 / - 银行 / 455 / 192.08 / 0.17 / -3.68 / 4.16 / 1876.16 / 8.27 / 2.94 / - | 交通运输 | | | | | | | | | | | 汽车与零部件 / 298 / 1046.32 / -0.84 / 7.00 / -13.70 / 1724.18 / -12.80 / 1.52 / - 汽车与零部件 / 386 / 1023.47 / -0.44 / 1.00 / 1000.00 / -1.00 / 0.90 / - | 工业 | | | | | | | | | | | 工业金属 / 102 / 3087.19 / 0.79 / -1.14 / 8.86 / 4716.75 / 9.59 / 1.07 / - 工业工程 / 330 / 2374.67 / 0.69 / 0.22 / 21.64 / 2765.46 / 22.76 / 1.35 / - 工业材料 / 95 / 298.59 / 0.35 / 3.08 / 3.74 / 527.06 / 5.51 / 2.76 / - 工业金属与矿业 / 314 / 1179.71 / 0.27 / -3.45 / -1.24 / 2140.22 / -2.62 / 0.27 / 。
服务业 / 235 / 1327.75 / -0.01 / 8.71 / 3.31 / 1947.43 / 4.32 / 1.24 / - 工业 / 2062 / 1613.23 / 0.53 / 2.78 / 12.54 / 2577.13 / 13.71 / 1.41 / - 房地产 / 204 / 191.35 / 0.00 / - / 2146.65 / -1.00 / 0.54 / - 资源与材料 / - 基础材料 / 998 / 1161.87 / -0.21 / 13.78 / 22.05 / 1077.26 / 23.37 / 1.90 / - 基础材料 / 434 / 1089.03 / 0.53 / 2.40 / 17.75 / 1953.31 / 19.55 / 2.05 / - 建筑与材料 / 461 / 1456.78 / 0.82 / -0.58 / 3.05 / 2417.97 / 4.29 / 1.61 / - 建筑与材料 / 40 / 135.26 / 0.26 / -0.58 / 135.26 / -0.58 / 0.58 / - 贵金属与矿业 / 95 / 1681.40 / -2.02 / 36.66 / 18.33 / 2980.52 / 19.64 / 1.37 / -
英国公司业绩
公司 / 营业额(英镑) ------ / ------------- Arrow Exploration $ / 营业额 57.7m (35.4m) Empire Metals / 营业额 -(-) Greatland Resources $ / 融资 23亿 (957.4m) Jadestone Energy $ / 营业额 234.0m (228.3m) Macfarlane Group / 营业额 148.9m (146.6m) Partners Group Private Equity € / 营业额 -(-) PPHE Hotel / 营业额 209.3m (199.9m) Prudential $ / 营业额 59亿 (53亿) Pulsar Helium $ / 融资 -(-) South32 $ / 融资 58亿 (58亿)
收盘价(便士) / 涨跌幅(%) / 收盘价(便士) / 涨跌幅(%) ------ / -------------- / ----------- / -------------- / ----------- 3i / 2834.00 / -0.35 / Intl Care Airlines / 436.90 Aberdeen / 251.00 / 0.06 / JCI / 2508.00 Airbus / 4076.00 / -1.26 / Interlink / 5445.00 Airtel Africa / 3460.00 / 0.12 / Investec / 645.00 Alliance Writon / 1373.00 / -0.65 / JD Sports Fashion / 86.44 Anglo American / 4543.00 / 0.55 / Kingfisher / 318.30 Ashtead Lines / 4439.00 / 0.37 / Lion Energy / 696.50 Asics, Biot Finance / 2664.00 / -0.72 / Legal & General / 291.20 AstraZeneca / 12114.00 / -0.98 / Lion Finance / 13360.00 AutostrSector / 536.20 / -0.56 / Lloyds Bkg Grp / 109.20 Aviva / 722.00 / -0.89 / London Stock Exchange Ptg / 17.72 Babcock Intl / 1002.00 / -0.32 / Lab Stock Ex / 8980.00 BAC Systems / 2000.00 / 0.19 / M&G / 348.70 Bentley / 452.60 / 1.39 / Marathon Oil / 301.40 Barrett-Redford / 319.50 / -0.84 / Melrose Ind / 509.00 Beazley / 1298.50 / -0.04 / Metron Energy / 4235.00 BP / 515.40 / -1.40 / Nat Grid / 1160.00 | BHP, Amer.
【识别噪声修复:该段为报纸页眉页脚、版面导航、订阅、出版或版权信息,原始识别混有大量英文残片与版面噪声,已合并为中文说明。】
| 股票名称 | 收盘价(便士) | 涨跌幅(%) | 股票名称 | 收盘价(便士) | 涨跌幅(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATC Music Group | 182.50 | - | Mendell Helium | 5.95 | 2.02 |
| Braucas Solutions | 182.50 | - | Meridian Mining | 95.00 | 8.74 |
| Central Africa Group | 200.00 | - | PetroChina | 26.50 | - |
| Comcast Metals | 111.00 | 2.30 | Power Probe | 65.50 | 1.35 |
| Daimch Corp | 464.00 | - | Rith Helium | 7.50 | -1.32 |
| EDM Medical Group | 10.00 | - | Sensil Resources | 21.00 | - |
| Generation Essentials | 85.71 | 0.04 | Sintana Energy | 21.50 | - |
| Halo | - | - | - | - | - |
Fonix Financial / 145.00 / - / Tapix Holdings / 44.00 / - Mayflower Acquisition / 604.71 / 0.04 / The Smarter Web Co / 31.80 / 0.36
Crown Castle / 75.54 / -0.75 CDX / 51.76 / 0.25 康明斯 / 578.14 / 5.47 Danaher / 94.34 / 0.36 Danaher / 215.36 / -0.61 迪尔公司 / 624.54 / 3.88 德尔福科技 / 463.82 / 12.30 数字信号服务 / 114.25 / 0.00 数字地产信托 / 193.43 / 1.11 多米尼恩能源 / 66.91 / -0.02 DollarSuisse A / 239.93 / 3.43 东亚 / 143.25 / 0.00 伊士曼 / 121.89 / 0.30 埃德森公司 / 419.44 / 10.24 Ecolab / 290.60 / 1.08 ElevanceHealth / 462.54 / 3.67 礼来公司 / 1189.41 / 445.22 Energent Electric / 158.29 / 3.33 Enelis / 144.84 / 1.06 Eogilon / 107.61 / 6.17 埃克森美孚控股 / 44.44 / 0.13 埃克森美孚 / 158.19 / -2.45 法拉利 / 51.51 / 0.84 联邦快递 / 335.99 / 2.28 弗格森企业 / 225.73 FCC(美元66) / 1133.70 / 3.44 Fiatry°F / 100.00 / 0.00 Fiatry Entertainment / 98.00 / -4.00 Fortinet公司 / 157.54 / 3.88 FreeportMcKesson / 78.00 / -0.91 游戏 / 269.02 / 0.57 吉利德科学 / 100.00 / 0.00 GE医疗科技 / 73.31 / -0.60 GE Vernova / 953.09 / 26.38 通用动力 / 387.02 / 5.44 Genetext / 148.09 / -0.68 吉利德科学 / 148.09 / -0.68 高盛集团 / 1040.46 / -18.42 HCA医疗 / 427.16 / -1.60 IIMR / 229.00 / -0.00 家得宝 / 334.85 / -3.03 Howmet国际 / 220.67 / 4.69 Howmet航空航天 / 269.34 / 5.30 IBM / 229.00 / -0.00 伊利诺伊工具制造 / 285.51 / 3.88 英特尔 / 88.24 / 0.76 Interactive Bkgers有限公司* / 97.02 / -1.17 洲际酒店集团 / 100.00 / 0.00 Intuit / 345.88 / -11.98 Intuitive Surgical / 370.42 / -1.43 强生 / 270.00 / -3.14 摩根大通 / 25.00 / -0.01 摩根大通 / 356.50 / -0.19 Kenvue / 19.22 / -0.11 Keurig Oil Parp / 32.20 / 0.36 KeyCorp Inc. / 26.00 / 0.00 | 克罗格抵押贷款
KKB & Co. / 108.50 / 0.50 LILA / 183.63 / 0.48 Marathon Technologies / 362.96 / -2.62 Lam Research / 312.88 / -1.78 Linde / 450.33 / 3.13 Lockheed Martin / 585.62 / 9.10 LindePfdA / 116.55 / -0.26 Lululemon Industria / 118.35 / -1.98 Manhattan Petroleum / 362.27 / 7.39 Marriott International / 356.67 / 0.90 Marathon Oil & Gas / 115.00 / -0.11 Marvell Technology / 245.11 / 4.72 Mercantier / 588.47 / -0.90 McDonald's / 266.93 / -1.17 McDonald's / 686.65 / -8.44 Microsoft / 62.32 / 0.00 Mens Squares / 153.10 / -3.35 Meta Platforms A / 576.14 / 6.08 Meta Inc. / 98.52 / 0.65 Microsoft Computer Science / 538.97 / -1.84 Microsoft / 496.37 / 4.66 Mondelez International A / 63.01 / 0.07 Monster Brands / 47.81 / -0.92 Morgan Stanley / 514.00 / -1.68 Morgan Stanley / 214.89 / -2.69 Motorola Solutions / 467.78 / 1.89 MSD Res / 564.22 / -0.23 MitsubishiUFJ / 115.00 / -0.00 Netflix / 81.46 / -0.77 Newmont Corp / 131.60 / -3.54 NewMedia / 84.22 / 0.23 Nokia / 38.30 / -0.69 NorfolkSouthern / 352.68 / 1.44 Northrop Grumman / 549.85 / 7.43 Nu Holdings A / 15.17 / 0.03 Nokia / 15.17 / 0.03 NXP Semiconductors / 223.15 / -1.60 Occidental Petroleum / 58.62 / 0.21
Futu Holdings A / 127.34 / 1.71 / 202.53 / 80.50 / 2.00 / 12.19 / 97.54 POD Holdings A / 86.74 / -1.01 / 139.41 / 71.94 / 0.00 / 34.70 / 492.56 | Denmark (DKK) | | | | | | | | DSV A / S / 1375.00 / -25.00 / 1913.50 / 1233.00 / 0.51 / 40.09 / 390.61 Novo Nordisk B / 304.95 / -2.85 / 409.95 / 224.25 / 3.84 / 13.22 / 1033.82
United Kingdom (USD)
FT GLOBAL 500: THE WORLD'S LARGEST COMPANIES
价格 / + / –股息 / 最高 / 最低 / 股息率 / 市盈率 / 市值(十亿) | 澳大利亚(澳元) | | | | | | | | ANZ集团控股 / 36.95 / -0.08 / 41.00 / 32.46 / 5.89 / 18.98 / 111.44 BHP集团 / 67.40 / -0.27 / 68.22 / 39.30 / 3.56 / 34.81 / 342.67 澳大利亚联邦银行 / 155.46 / -1.55 / 185.59 / 146.98 / 3.25 / 23.82 / 260.16 CSL有限公司 / 172.44 / -1.20 / 222.47 / 90.00 / 2.36 / 26.82 / 82.58 麦格理集团 / 252.77 / 0.77 / 267.90 / 197.31 / 3.18 / 25.82 / 96.97 澳大利亚国民银行 / 38.26 / 0.01 / 48.45 / 35.48 / 4.44 / 17.31 / 119.27 西农场商业 / 83.27 / 0.58 / 94.70 / 70.60 / 2.56 / 32.28 / 94.53 Wespac银行 / 33.83 / -0.19 / 43.32 / 33.46 / 4.55 / 16.84 / 115.71 | 比利时(欧元) | | | | | | | | 怡安 / 57.75 / 0.30 / 67.10 / 40.85 / 4.19 / 57.75 / 101.91
最高 / 最低 / 股息率 / 市盈率 / 市值 / 资产(M / A) | 菲洛(欧元) | | | | | | | | 诺迪亚银行股份公司 / 17.48 / 0.01 / 17.77 / 12.94 / 0.00 / 12.58 / 59.48 | 法国(欧元) | | | | | | | | 空气液化集团 / 168.72 / 0.94 / 169.80 / 154.86 / 1.99 / 32.33 / 107.67 空客 / 205.85 / 1.30 / 221.30 / 157.42 / 1.55 / 38.40 / 163.09 阿斯麦 / 42.71 / 0.03 / 45.66 / 36.55 / 5.31 / 12.18 / 91.38 空气液化集团A / 155.72 / -0.01 / 160.30 / 138.00 / 1.00 / 25.48 / 30.25 康明斯集团管理公司 / 82.30 / 1.04 / 95.86 / 65.88 / 2.79 / 12.28 / 40.72 克雷索农业 / 19.01 / 0.01 / 20.40 / 15.29 / 0.00 / 8.72 / 57.52 达能 / 65.72 / 0.28 / 80.14 / 60.64 / 3.42 / 25.57 / 44.91 德意志银行 / 22.54 / -0.11 / 30.36 / 18.97 / 1.00 / 20.64 / 30.25 ENGL / 24.96 / -0.37 / 29.89 / 17.30 / 4.13 / 16.42 / 63.46 依视路-陆逊梯卡 / 158.20 / 0.05 / 323.80 / 159.15 / 2.51 / 30.62 / 73.91 爱马仕国际 / 1547.50 / -8.00 / 2300.00 / 1465.50 / 1.16 / 35.23 / 103.37 伊比德罗拉 / 387.20 / -1.30 / 413.00 / 306.00 / 1.00 / 24.88 / 100.00 LMHerm赫克托尼克斯 / 453.80 / 3.30 / 654.70 / 440.00 / 2.85 / 23.76 / 224.85 赛峰集团 / 352.40 / 6.60 / 366.50 / 262.60 / 0.96 / 46.11 / 146.59 赛诺菲 / 78.29 / -0.45 / 91.15 / 71.25 / 5.26 / 10.00 / 94.56
TJX / 11.80 / -0.01 / 12.30 / 9.80 / 0.00 / 10.88 / 10.00 VMCI / 119.50 / -0.10 / 143.15 / 112.40 / 4.23 / 13.81 / 70.15
Vita Unibanco Holdi Prd / 39.45 / 0.01 / 49.67 / 38.55 / 0.00 / 213.39 Pristoria Brasileiro / 45.50 / -0.05 / 56.14 / 30.96 / 0.00 / 40.71 / 341.82 Pristoria Brasileiro Prd / 41.45 / 0.10 / 50.69 / 29.31 / 0.00 / 225.76
Canada (CAD) / 78.45 / -0.25 / 91.62 / 54.68 / 0.00 / 88.39 / 332.86 Argenta Eagle Mines / 296.80 / -13.18 / 344.96 / 184.64 / 0.00 / 25.32 / 151.21 Alimentation Cautious Ltd / 84.27 / -0.92 / 95.15 / 68.30 / 1.02 / 28.98 / 77.38 Bank of America / 116.50 / -0.10 / 121.80 / 76.50 / 1.02 / 28.98 / 77.38 Bank of Nova Scotia / 129.81 / 1.08 / 129.25 / 84.41 / 3.31 / 26.71 / 180.00 Brookfield / 57.68 / -0.35 / 102.59 / 52.04 / 0.67 / 103.32 / 129.16 Brookfield Asset Mgmt. / 72.22 / -0.39 / 88.51 / 58.09 / 3.87 / 41.27 / 115.35 Canadian Imperial Bank / 103.50 / 0.10 / 112.07 / 100.50 / 2.81 / 28.64 / 151.80 Canadian National Bank / 116.50 / -0.10 / 121.80 / 76.50 / 3.87 / 31.27 / 115.35 Canadian National / 68.93 / 0.25 / 70.99 / 41.67 / 3.83 / 16.81 / 142.10 Canadian Pacific Airways / 131.40 / 0.87 / 133.38 / 98.50 / 0.75 / 41.71 / 115.51 Construction Materials / 20707.00 / -60.63 / 4634.98 / 2180.00 / 0.19 / 1033.68 / 455.06 Enbridge / 69.80 / 0.87 / 80.65 / 62.42 / 5.56 / 38.54 / 125.42 Enbridge Midstream / 116.50 / 0.10 / 121.80 / 76.50 / 3.87 / 31.27 / 115.35 Royal Bank of Canada / 288.11 / 1.48 / 306.38 / 188.54 / 2.44 / 26.17 / 408.41 Diploma Pty Ltd / 208.50 / -4.34 / 253.10 / 129.01 / 0.00 / 139.83 / 251.99 Societ Energy / 91.13 / 0.64 / 98.53 / 53.02 / 2.63 / 23.79 / 106.59 TJX Corp / 87.16 / 1.04 / 108.18 / 64.04 / 3.43 / 34.86 / 87.16 TE Connectors Comm BK / 116.50 / -0.10 / 126.61 / 78.01 / 0.00 / 225.76 Waste Connections / 2327.00 / 2.57 / 250.50 / 203.46 / 0.94 / 55.50 / 58.49
阿迪达斯股份公司 / 150.70 / -1.90 / 451.40 / 338.80 / 3.79 / 15.79 / 171.84 东方石油 / 107.78 / -0.30 / 47.78 / 33.21 / 4.66 / 14.21 / 24.21 宝马 / 57.69 / -0.32 / 97.32 / 56.40 / 7.63 / 4.85 / 35.52 德意志银行 / 34.63 / -1.43 / 34.26 / 23.82 / 2.89 / 10.96 / 66.16 德意志交易所 / 288.90 / -0.60 / 289.00 / 1.00 / 4.16 / 43.54 / 53.45 德国电信股份公司 / 29.53 / -0.17 / 34.36 / 23.53 / 3.46 / 14.69 / 140.30 DVA集团 / 56.92 / -0.07 / 58.30 / 36.99 / 3.34 / 18.39 / 65.34 因福玛科技 / 65.19 / -0.34 / 68.63 / 38.02 / 0.63 / 11.68 / 72.07 英飞凌软件 / 446.64 / -0.27 / 446.64 / 22.25 / 0.53 / 12.38 / 22.16 默克 / 138.65 / -0.70 / 148.80 / 100.70 / 1.59 / 21.70 / 17.92 明兴银行 / 515.80 / -1.40 / 575.90 / 437.40 / 4.65 / 24.63 / 65.49 保时捷 / 43.25 / -0.83 / 50.66 / 35.62 / 2.34 / 10.95 / 19.70 里奇马里塔尔 / 1138.80 / 20.60 / 2008.00 / 800.20 / 1.01 / 68.98 / 53.27 SAP / 180.02 / -5.44 / 244.30 / 137.50 / 1.39 / 28.22 / 221.16 SAP / 158.10 / -1.00 / 158.10 / 100.00 / 1.00 西门子能源 / 151.10 / -1.66 / 191.66 / 83.32 / 0.46 / 238.44 / 130.11 西门子健康 / 38.26 / -0.44 / 49.71 / 32.81 / 2.55 / 30.55 / 44.29 大众汽车 / 73.55 / -1.10 / 110.20 / 71.00 / 7.07 / 5.53 / 21.70 大众集团 / 72.42 / -0.88 / 109.15 / 68.20 / 7.26 / 5.45 / 43.93
中国银行(A股) / 6.20 / 0.06 / 6.39 / 5.13 / 3.85 / 8.06 / 14.79 交通银行(A股) / 7.17 / 0.01 / 7.77 / 6.37 / 4.53 / 6.66 / 415.19 中国建设银行(A股) / 10.67 / 0.01 / 10.98 / 9.50 / 3.84 / 8.21 / 226.02 中国人寿保险(A股) / 38.58 / 0.06 / 41.92 / 30.32 / 2.23 / 7.08 / 603.37 中国移动通信(A股) / 10.50 / 0.01 / 10.88 / 9.28 / 3.15 / 7.00 / 100.00
中国石油化工
中国海外工程A / 47.26 / 0.09 / 51.18 / 37.24 / 4.25 / 17.77 / 865.42 中国长江基建A / 28.24 / 0.03 / 29.57 / 25.58 / 3.54 / 20.02 / 690.98 中国中铁A / 10.00 / 0.01 / 10.00 / 9.00 / 3.00 / 10.00 / 100.00 仓邦凯 Tbk A / 379.69 / 0.27 / 468.75 / 272.72 / 0.95 / 23.48 / 16107.71 东方万家置业A / 19.36 / 0.43 / 29.36 / 17.22 / 0.53 / 25.31 / 306.32 Fascot Oil Int'l E / 60.57 / 0.42 / 64.95 / 44.22 / 1.62 / 34.03 / 1201.86 工银瑞信B / 1.92 / 0.01 / 2.00 / 1.88 / 0.00 / 1.88 / 100.00 兴业银行J / 18.17 / 0.19 / 23.06 / 16.44 / 5.85 / 5.95 / 385.38 江苏恒信纸业A / 46.74 / 0.25 / 74.04 / 45.26 / 0.43 / 39.28 / 298.15 贵州茅台A / 1302.20 / -1.00 / 1586.00 / 1151.01 / 3.99 / 18.94 / 12638.61 辽源金融国际A / 57.13 / 2.35 / 67.76 / 42.99 / 0.44 / 24.94 / 419.39 辽源金融国际B / 88.20 / 0.35 / 98.20 / 64.88 / 0.44 / 24.94 / 100.00 中国石油A / 11.01 / -0.18 / 13.69 / 8.04 / 4.27 / 12.80 / 1.78 平安保险集团A / 56.13 / 1.12 / 74.68 / 46.90 / 4.86 / 7.31 / 588.35 紫金银行A / 5.08 / 0.04 / 6.44 / 4.76 / 4.30 / 8.36 / 5.09 无锡商业银行A / 10.00 / 0.01 / 10.00 / 8.00 / 3.00 / 10.00 / 100.00 五粮液银行东区A / 71.90 / 0.38 / 131.85 / 70.52 / 7.17 / 31.17 / 279.09 致铭集团A / 34.77 / 0.49 / 47.94 / 24.96 / 2.32 / 17.68 / 710.14
| 墨西哥(墨西哥比索) | 美洲电信B / 20.09 / -0.05 / 24.48 / 17.48 / 2.69 / 0.00 / 1249.30 墨西哥沃尔玛 / 47.93 / 0.20 / 63.97 / 46.31 / 2.42 / 0.00 / 836.20 | 荷兰(欧元) | Adyen / 1071.40 / -7.60 / 1600.80 / 772.40 / 0.00 / 58.84 / 33.95 ASM Holding / 1487.60 / -3.40 / 1741.00 / 611.80 / 0.52 / 75.22 / 581.29 Heineken / 72.82 / 0.40 / 80.44 / 63.90 / 2.64 / 15.63 / 41.17
< / td> 30.57< / ><>0.41< / ><>31.21< / ><>20.21< / ><>3.72< / ><>15.44< / ><>87.82< / >< / tr> <>Prosus N< / ><>38.01< / ><>-0.04< / ><>63.94< / ><>36.17< / ><>0.74< / ><>7.19< / ><>83.11< / >< / ><><>The Magnum for Crown Co< / ><>17.45< / ><>0.18< / ><>17.57< / ><>11.02< / ><>0.00< / ><>36.35< / ><>10.68< / >< / ><><>Universal Music Group NV< / ><>14.64< / ><>-0.23< / ><>25.37< / ><>14.17< / ><>3.55< / ><>34.05< / ><>26.92< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">挪威(NOK)< / >< / table>
<><>Equinor< / ><>387.60< / ><>-2.30< / ><>422.30< / ><>226.40< / ><>3.72< / ><>199.79< / ><>926.65< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">大韩民国(KRW)< / >< / ><><>LG Energy Solution< / ><>351000.00< / ><>1500.00< / ><>527000.00< / ><>290500.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>76.55< / ><>8214.00< / >< / ><><>SAMSLING BIOLOGICS< / ><>1589000.00< / ><>14000.00< / ><>1987000.00< / ><>983000.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>66.37< / ><>74019.23< / >< / ><><>Samsung Electronics< / ><>267500.00< / ><>4500.00< / ><>374500.00< / ><>67500.00< / ><>0.64< / ><>39.59< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Samsung Electronics Pref< / ><>196800.00< / ><>2300.00< / ><>243500.00< / ><>55100.00< / ><>0.86< / ><>196.08< / ><>157906.65< / >< / ><><>Samsung Eps< / ><>380000.00< / ><>14000.00< / ><>773000.00< / ><>339000.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>300.87< / ><>9455.56< / >< / ><><>SK hynix< / ><>1688000.00< / ><>10000.00< / ><>2987000.00< / ><>253000.00< / ><>0.16< / ><>27.21< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>
<>< rowspan="2">股票< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< ="2">涨跌< / >< colspan="3">52周< / >< ="2">收益率< / >< ="2">市盈率< / >< ="2">市值(十亿)< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / >< / ><><>信越化学< / ><>5987.00< / ><>-38.00< / ><>7939.00< / ><>4366.00< / ><>1.94< / ><>23.61< / ><>11944.47< / >< / ><><>软银集团< / ><>239.50< / ><>0.20< / ><>248.50< / ><>232.60< / ><>3.67< / ><>21.10< / ><>11502.92< / >< / ><><>软银集团< / ><>5163.00< / ><>76.00< / ><>37895.00< / ><>3385.00< / ><>0.21< / ><>5.91< / ><>29498.27< / >< / ><><>索尼金融集团< / ><>162.70< / ><>0.60< / ><>219.00< / ><>129.30< / ><>4.50< / ><>20.44< / ><>1101.54< / >< / ><><>索尼集团< / ><>3079.00< / ><>46.00< / ><>4776.00< / ><>3043.00< / ><>0.90< / ><>70.90< / ><>23133.50< / >< / ><><>三井住友金融集团< / ><>6732.00< / ><>99.00< / ><>7500.00< / ><>3668.00< / ><>2.67< / ><>16.34< / ><>25565.17< / >< / ><><>武田制药< / ><>5860.00< / ><>47.00< / ><>6633.00< / ><>4102.00< / ><>3.46< / ><>60.57< / ><>39366.35< / >< / ><><>东京海上控股< / ><>7629.00< / ><>221.00< / ><>8468.00< / ><>5300.00< / ><>3.21< / ><>27.31< / ><>14754.49< / >< / ><><>东京电子< / ><>55500.00< / ><>90.00< / ><>81298.00< / ><>19670.00< / ><>0.83< / ><>44.24< / ><>23557.82< / >< / ><><>丰田汽车< / ><>3070.00< / ><>-12.00< / ><>4000.00< / ><>2666.00< / ><>3.26< / ><>10.40< / ><>44806.51< / >< / table>
<><>BioNTech< / ><>112.56< / ><>-1.49< / ><>124.00< / ><>79.52< / ><>0.00< / ><>53.66< / ><>28.46< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">香港(HKD)< / >< / ><><>AIA集团< / ><>74.20< / ><>-0.15< / ><>92.15< / ><>68.95< / ><>2.67< / ><>125.55< / ><>767.72< / >< / ><><>港交所< / ><>420.80< / ><>3.00< / ><>462.20< / ><>360.00< / ><>3.32< / ><>29.95< / ><>533.51< / >< / table>
| 沙特阿拉伯(沙特里亚尔) | | --- | ACWA Power / 196.80 / -0.60 / 252.60 / 154.50 / 0.23 / 82.00 / 150.85 Al Rajhi Bank / 69.00 / 0.05 / 113.00 / 62.00 / 2.42 / 17.69 / 414.00 Saudi Arabian Mining / 70.40 / 0.90 / 79.90 / 51.25 / 0.00 / 90.26 / 273.77 Saudi Arabian Oil / 26.10 / -0.18 / 27.96 / 23.04 / 5.20 / 18.12 / 63.16 Saudi Basic Industries / 50.35 / 0.05 / 64.00 / 48.20 / 5.16 / 98.73 / 151.05 Saudi National Bank / 43.40 / 0.38 / 45.24 / 33.30 / 5.30 / 10.74 / 280.40 STC Co / 44.60 / 0.32 / 45.38 / 41.14 / 4.93 / 15.02 / 223.00
| 印度(印度卢比) | | --- | HHEX India / 420.80 / 3.00 / 462.20 / 360.00 / 3.32 / 29.95 / 533.51 Bajaj Food Finance / 1087.05 / 6.00 / 1177.60 / 788.40 / 0.55 / 57.05 / 6767.93 Bharti Agric Ltd / 1905.00 / -37.00 / 2174.70 / 1745.00 / 1.26 / 145.531 / 1888.15 HCL Technologies / 1300.00 / -12.00 / 1770.00 / 1020.00 / 4.62 / 20.26 / 3527.76 Hindustan Software / 721.00 / -10.00 / 865.00 / 620.00 / 1.03 / 26.57 / 453.38 Industion Industries / 2030.00 / 6.00 / 2779.70 / 2006.90 / 2.02 / 46.41 / 4769.67 ICICI Bank / 1430.70 / 7.70 / 1479.90 / 1187.55 / 0.84 / 22.64 / 10.00 Infosys / 1120.80 / -22.20 / 1727.95 / 964.00 / 4.28 / 17.38 / 4548.27 ITC Ltd / 270.85 / -0.15 / 426.50 / 265.10 / 5.35 / 9.75 / 3393.69 Kraft-Makko Finance Bank / 416.20 / 14.20 / 435.15 / 345.40 / 0.16 / 3.74 / 4140.10 Lamard & Toubro / 4043.80 / -72.60 / 4440.00 / 3288.65 / 0.94 / 34.58 / 5563.73 Life Insurance Corp / 416.00 / 1.10 / 856.60 / 385.90 / 2.40 / 14.62 / 5260.40 Lancashire / 1225.00 / -12.00 / 1731.81 / 1202.00 / 1.03 / 28.97 / 4523.67 Reliance Industries / 1299.00 / -13.60 / 1611.20 / 1250.55 / 0.46 / 25.24 / 17567.76 State Bank of India / 1053.80 / 6.80 / 1234.80 / 798.60 / 1.65 / 12.13 / 9727.22 Sun Pharmaceutical Inds / 1901.00 / -16.00 / 2047.55 / 1547.25 / 0.84 / 41.69 / 4561.03 Tata Consultancy Svs / 2271.00 / -20.00 / 3336.70 / 1970.00 / 2.86 / 16.92 / 8216.68
好事达银行控股 / 116.60 / 2.40 / 186.20 / 86.65 / 0.88 / 104.48 / 233.59 中国银行 / 5.55 / 0.01 / 5.51 / 4.11 / 4.60 / 7.51 / 464.52 交通银行 H / 7.57 / 0.04 / 7.83 / 6.33 / 4.85 / 7.01 / 285.04 BTO Inc / 83.60 / -1.00 / 120.60 / 71.40 / 0.44 / 25.87 / 341.98 中信银行 / 8.65 / 0.01 / 8.65 / 7.45 / 4.70 / 10.00 / 14.75 中国建设银行 H / 9.21 / 0.04 / 9.36 / 7.18 / 4.76 / 7.08 / 22.15 中国人寿保险 H / 29.20 / 1.08 / 36.16 / 20.90 / 3.32 / 5.36 / 217.28 招商银行 H / 49.42 / 0.04 / 53.70 / 43.34 / 4.60 / 8.67 / 226.88 中国石油化工 H / 4.71 / 0.01 / 5.70 / 3.36 / 5.33 / 17.98 / 113.02 中国中铁 H / 10.00 / 0.01 / 10.00 / 7.00 / 4.00 / 10.00 中信证券 H / 17.64 / 1.66 / 32.50 / 22.24 / 3.53 / 14.10 / 94.63 ICICI / 7.54 / 0.07 / 7.66 / 5.56 / 4.64 / 7.54 / 654.86 JCI com A / 113.10 / 0.10 / 143.80 / 95.80 / 3.47 / 16.42 / 282.36 Median B / 76.65 / 0.05 / 122.60 / 63.65 / 0.00 / 20.22 / 456.79 纳斯达克中国 / 10.00 / 0.01 / 10.00 / 7.00 / 4.00 / 10.00 网易 / 195.50 / -3.50 / 249.00 / 168.00 / 2.35 / 18.46 / 627.96 南京钢铁 H / 44.04 / 1.06 / 56.25 / 39.22 / 2.56 / 31.24 / 221.93 中国石油 H / 9.92 / -0.14 / 12.22 / 6.99 / 3.23 / 11.53 / 209.30 中国平安保险集团 L / 15.25 / 0.15 / 74.70 / 50.00 / 5.52 / 7.31 / 428.35 中石化与中国石油 H / 10.00 / 0.01 / 10.00 / 7.00 / 4.00 / 10.00 腾讯控股 / 445.40 / 3.40 / 683.00 / 411.00 / 1.19 / 18.00 / 4054.54 小米集团 B / 28.46 / 0.70 / 59.90 / 21.30 / 0.00 / 17.57 / 607.05 福建紫金矿业集团 H / 36.08 / 1.04 / 46.98 / 24.34 / 2.42 / 19.53 / 228.06
FT Banto Renewables / 3310.00 / 90.00 / 10725.00 / 2300.00 / 0.12 / 0.00 / 428.32 | Italy (EUR) | | | | | | | | Asocurazioni Generali / 44.08 / 0.42 / 45.48 / 31.76 / 3.72 / 18.14 / 67.65 Enel / 9.51 / -0.04 / 10.31 / 7.69 / 5.15 / 25.71 / 96.72 Eni / 23.02 / -0.24 / 25.02 / 14.48 / 4.78 / 16.33 / 69.72 Ferrari / 356.15 / -5.65 / 431.20 / 269.00 / 0.84 / 51.54 / 63.14 Intesa Sanpaolo / 6.86 / 0.02 / 6.94 / 4.81 / 5.48 / 29.83 / 121.32 Stellantis / 4.46 / -0.03 / 10.49 / 4.37 / 0.00 / 6.00 / 12.93 UniCredit SpA / 86.15 / 1.82 / 85.98 / 57.36 / 3.66 / 16.88 / 134.54
Chugai Pharmaceutical / 7851.00 / 101.00 / 5378.00 / 6002.00 / 2.87 / 28.74 / 11338.04 Daethi Sarayek / 2300.00 / 70.50 / 4178.00 / 2298.00 / 24.5 / 19.19 / 5432.28 FAST RETAILING / 72120.00 / 418.00 / 68600.00 / 4308.00 / 6.91 / 51.59 / 22920.10 Hitachi / 5367.00 / 7.00 / 6030.00 / 3021.00 / 19.65 / 29.65 / 24570.20 Honda Motor / 1674.50 / -21.50 / 1765.50 / 1238.00 / 41.58 / 15.79 / 7358.51 HENYA / 24965.00 / -38.00 / 30430.00 / 19800.00 / 11.56 / 33.56 / 8358.23 ITOUZHI / 2138.00 / 20.00 / 9959.00 / 1801.00 / 16.78 / 19647.40 Japan Tobacco / 6963.00 / -3.00 / 7216.00 / 4652.00 / 24.30 / 13966.00 KDDI / 2897.50 / -12.00 / 3121.00 / 2397.50 / 25.58 / 15.78 / 17611.59 Kyotores / 61500.00 / -756.00 / 67830.00 / 51510.00 / 67.44 / 16.40 / 18621.43 Mitsubishi Heavy / 4174.00 / -6.00 / 6817.00 / 3303.00 / 23.25 / 17.23 / 15358.27 Mitsubishi UFJ Finl / 4303.00 / -17.50 / 4397.00 / 2747.00 / 18.73 / 16.73 / 15477.73 Mitsubishi UFJ Finl&F / 5759.00 / 55.00 / 3813.00 / 2103.00 / 28.58 / 16.79 / 42143.54 Mitau & Co / 4894.00 / -55.00 / 6675.00 / 3308.00 / 25.85 / 16.81 / 14019.68 Mizuho Financial Group / 8374.00 / 106.00 / 8919.00 / 4056.00 / 18.92 / 16.53 / 20339.71 Nintendo / 8986.00 / 32.00 / 14630.00 / 6544.00 / 22.41 / 14.47 / 11421.46 NTT / 169.80 / 0.40 / 169.40 / 142.00 / 31.18 / 13.45 / 15573.39 Renault Heinzland / 17155.00 / 550.00 / 16960.00 / 6040.00 / 41.95 / 25.00 / 25260.81
ABB< / td><>79.70< / ><>0.08< / ><>89.14< / ><>52.66< / ><>1.18< / ><>30.77< / ><>145.31< / >< / tr> <><>Alcon< / ><>58.60< / ><>-0.12< / ><>68.34< / ><>47.80< / ><>0.48< / ><>56.35< / ><>29.28< / >< / > <><>Richemont< / ><>191.00< / ><>3.95< / ><>202.20< / ><>127.20< / ><>1.73< / ><>40.73< / ><>102.68< / >< / > <><>Givaudan< / ><>3373.00< / ><>52.00< / ><>3692.00< / ><>2566.00< / ><>2.13< / ><>37.89< / ><>31.14< / >< / > <><>Hokim< / ><>73.80< / ><>2.64< / ><>82.54< / ><>60.10< / ><>2.30< / ><>22.92< / ><>41.84< / >< / > <><>Lonza Group< / ><>587.80< / ><>-8.00< / ><>597.80< / ><>454.60< / ><>0.85< / ><>65.92< / ><>41.28< / >< / > <><>Nestlé< / ><>79.67< / ><>0.05< / ><>78.09< / ><>70.29< / ><>3.88< / ><>22.75< / ><>205.79< / >< / > <><>Novartis< / ><>127.18< / ><>-1.16< / ><>131.50< / ><>96.03< / ><>2.91< / ><>41.70< / ><>258.79< / >< / > <><>Roche Holding< / ><>374.60< / ><>-4.40< / ><>383.00< / ><>264.60< / ><>2.62< / ><>23.15< / ><>39.97< / >< / > <><>Roche Holding Pref.< / ><>368.30< / ><>-5.50< / ><>375.60< / ><>291.00< / ><>2.66< / ><>22.76< / ><>258.75< / >< / > <><>Sika< / ><>193.10< / ><>2.75< / ><>197.60< / ><>120.35< / ><>1.92< / ><>29.71< / ><>30.99< / >< / > <><>Swiss Re< / ><>141.05< / ><>0.50< / ><>153.85< / ><>114.05< / ><>4.47< / ><>10.81< / ><>42.14< / >< / > <><>UBS Group< / ><>43.90< / ><>0.68< / ><>44.44< / ><>28.25< / ><>1.95< / ><>22.40< / ><>143.90< / >< / > <><>Zurich Insurance Group< / ><>587.80< / ><>2.80< / ><>626.00< / ><>521.00< / ><>5.02< / ><>18.69< / ><>90.40< / >< / > < / table>
<><>Hon Hai Precision< / ><>246.50< / ><>3.50< / ><>314.00< / ><>187.50< / ><>2.91< / ><>18.11< / ><>3458.06< / >< / > <><>MediaTek< / ><>3945.00< / ><>210.00< / ><>4970.00< / ><>1130.00< / ><>1.36< / ><>59.63< / ><>6327.37< / >< / > <><>Taiwan Semicon Mtg< / ><>2415.00< / ><>15.00< / ><>2535.00< / ><>1145.00< / ><>1.08< / ><>36.45< / ><>62626.67< / >< / > <>< colspan="8">阿拉伯联合酋长国(AED)< / >< / > < / table>
<><>阿布扎比国家石油公司天然气(Adnoc Gas)< / ><>3.24< / ><>-0.05< / ><>3.76< / ><>3.12< / ><>5.56< / ><>48.36< / ><>248.67< / >< / > <><>第一阿布扎比银行(First Abu Dhabi Bank)< / ><>19.42< / ><>-0.18< / ><>20.74< / ><>15.32< / ><>4.12< / ><>10.50< / ><>214.54< / >< / > <>< colspan="8">英国(GBP)< / >< / > <><>3i集团(3i Group Plc)< / ><>28.34< / ><>-0.10< / ><>44.97< / ><>18.25< / ><>2.98< / ><>5.25< / ><>28.49< / >< / > <><>阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)< / ><>121.14< / ><>-1.20< / ><>157.32< / ><>98.92< / ><>1.97< / ><>24.93< / ><>187.89< / >< / > <><>BAE系统公司(BAE Systems)< / ><>20.92< / ><>0.04< / ><>23.60< / ><>15.29< / ><>1.81< / ><>30.41< / ><>62.81< / >< / > <><>贝莱德(BlackRock)< / ><>4.93< / ><>-0.07< / ><>5.54< / ><>3.53< / ><>2.33< / ><>11.25< / ><>66.28< / >< / > <><>英国石油(BP)< / ><>5.15< / ><>-0.07< / ><>6.09< / ><>3.99< / ><>4.80< / ><>2.10< / ><>80.94< / >< / > <><>英美烟草(British American Tobacco)< / ><>41.52< / ><>-0.86< / ><>53.26< / ><>36.77< / ><>5.90< / ><>11.83< / ><>89.70< / >< / > <><>Compass集团(Compass Group)< / ><>22.45< / ><>0.31< / ><>25.81< / ><>20.00< / ><>2.26< / ><>27.69< / ><>38.17< / >< / > <><>帝亚吉欧(Diageo)< / ><>17.02< / ><>-0.35< / ><>21.09< / ><>12.96< / ><>2.16< / ><>29.59< / ><>37.89< / >< / > <><>Experian< / ><>30.45< / ><>0.78< / ><>39.87< / ><>22.03< / ><>1.70< / ><>25.14< / ><>27.01< / >< / > <><>嘉能可(Glencore)< / ><>5.95< / ><>-0.04< / ><>7.07< / ><>2.82< / ><>2.10< / ><>2.75< / ><>69.88< / >< / >
日期 / 利率类型 / 当前利率 / 实施日期 / 上次利率 ------------ / ---------------- / ---------- / ------------ / ---------- 美国 / 联邦基金利率 / 3.50-3.75 / 2026-04-29 / 3.50-3.75 美国 / 优惠利率 / 6.75 / 2026-04-29 / 6.75 美国 / 贴现利率 / 3.75 / 2026-04-29 / 3.75 欧元区 / 回购利率 / 1.925 / 2025-09-01 / 2.40 英国 / 回购利率 / 3.75 / 2026-04-30 / 3.75 日本 / 隔夜拆借利率 / 0.75 / 2026-01-22 / 0.50 瑞士 / 伦敦银行同业拆借利率目标 / 0.25 / 2025-03-21 / 0.50
利率均为英国时间上午11点固定。
国家 / 利率 / 与基准差 / 变动 ------------ / -------- / ---------- 意大利 / 3.60 / 0.35 / -1.05 法国 / 3.99 / 0.74 / -0.66 德国 / 3.25 / 0.00 / -1.40 爱尔兰 / 3.27 / 0.02 / -1.38 瑞典 / 2.91 / -0.34 / -1.74 英国 / 5.03 / 1.78 / 0.38 美国 / 4.65 / 1.40 / 0.00
股票代码 / 价格 / 涨跌 / 最高价 / 最低价 / 股息率 / 市盈率 / 市值(十亿英镑) ------------------------ / -------- / ------------------ 葛兰素史克(GSK) / 18.52 / -0.47 / 22.82 / 14.40 / 3.78 / 13.13 / 74.92 海伦(Haleon) / 3.69 / -0.04 / 4.16 / 2.74 / 1.98 / 19.87 / 32.50 汇丰控股(HSBC) / 15.04 / -0.18 / 16.10 / 8.43 / 3.67 / 16.88 / 258.23 劳埃德银行集团(Lloyds) / 1.03 / -0.08 / 1.18 / 0.97 / 3.61 / 15.61 / 100.00 伦敦证券交易所集团 / 89.80 / 2.92 / 101.40 / 66.84 / 1.76 / 37.67 / 43.61 国家电网 / 11.60 / -0.23 / 14.29 / 10.00 / 4.18 / 17.71 / 58.31 苏格兰皇家银行(NatWest) / 6.78 / -0.14 / 7.26 / 5.00 / 5.16 / 12.68 / 53.95 利洁时集团(Reckitt Benckiser) / 51.16 / -0.42 / 65.23 / 36.64 / 4.23 / 10.92 / 32.47 RELX / 26.68 / 0.82 / 35.75 / 19.91 / 2.58 / 23.69 / 46.62 力拓(Rio Tinto) / 76.88 / -0.34 / 91.17 / 45.28 / 4.45 / 17.02 / 96.50 劳斯莱斯控股 / 15.30 / -0.13 / 15.86 / 9.90 / 0.72 / 22.04 / 127.25 壳牌(Shell) / 33.11 / -0.60 / 37.59 / 25.54 / 4.56 / 14.84 / 183.22 联合利华(Unilever) / 47.52 / -0.20 / 55.42 / 36.44 / 3.47 / 12.80 / 102.37
品种 / 价格 / 涨跌 ------------ / ---------- / -------- 黄金 / 4610.02 / 14.61 白银(美元) / 69.35 / 1.26 铂金 / 1843.10 / 11.30 钯金 / 1334.68 / 14.49 铁矿石 / 95.95 / 0.03

所列价格仅供参考,发布时信息被认为准确。ICE或《金融时报》不做任何要约。本报不保证信息的可靠性或完整性,亦不对因依赖或使用该信息而产生的任何损失承担责任。如需进一步信息,请联系newspapers@ice.com
大宗商品< / td>< / tr><><>波罗的海干散货指数< / ><>3107.00< / ><>51.00< / >< / ><><>理查德兹 ICE期货< / ><>109.45< / ><>-0.05< / >< / table>
<><>Aus控股< / ><>251.06< / ><>9.50< / ><>453.70< / ><>100.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>295.37< / ><>261.73< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">美国(美元)< / >< / ><><>3< / ><>180.00< / ><>0.63< / ><>164.90< / ><>139.34< / ><>1.73< / ><>31.75< / ><>92.83< / >< / ><><>阿尔伯塔实验室< / ><>114.10< / ><>-2.03< / ><>17.49< / ><>81.97< / ><>2.21< / ><>38.81< / ><>197.44< / >< / ><><>阿斯利康< / ><>292.50< / ><>-1.00< / ><>265.00< / ><>181.00< / ><>3.55< / ><>14.36< / ><>110.99< / >< / ><><>阿森德里安金融< / ><>181.38< / ><>-5.55< / ><>259.00< / ><>118.15< / ><>3.59< / ><>14.36< / ><>110.99< / >< / ><><>阿什利< / ><>237.44< / ><>-0.45< / ><>37.06< / ><>190.12< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.64< / ><>108.70< / >< / ><><>好事达< / ><>138.66< / ><>1.27< / ><>132.27< / ><>104.26< / ><>2.08< / ><>12.62< / ><>58.98< / >< / ><><>阿尔斯通工业与化学< / ><>238.86< / ><>2.49< / ><>263.20< / ><>158.81< / ><>3.55< / ><>14.36< / ><>110.99< / >< / ><><>Aorbate A< / ><>180.00< / ><>-1.43< / ><>103.45< / ><>110.81< / ><>0.00< / ><>50.15< / ><>78.90< / >< / ><><>Abercim B< / ><>342.80< / ><>-4.96< / ><>408.61< / ><>205.05< / ><>0.26< / ><>16.96< / ><>2006.96< / >< / ><><>Alphabet C< / ><>538.10< / ><>-4.24< / ><>404.49< / ><>206.39< / ><>0.26< / ><>16.82< / ><>1874.21< / >< / ><><>奥驰亚集团< / ><>68.12< / ><>1.05< / ><>77.06< / ><>34.70< / ><>6.13< / ><>14.43< / ><>115.41< / >< / ><><>安进< / ><>290.20< / ><>-1.00< / ><>265.00< / ><>158.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.64< / ><>108.70< / >< / ><><>美国运通电力< / ><>132.36< / ><>0.59< / ><>145.58< / ><>100.00< / ><>3.08< / ><>21.28< / ><>671.16< / >< / ><><>美国运通< / ><>336.15< / ><>0.20< / ><>301.49< / ><>205.97< / ><>1.13< / ><>21.81< / ><>227.01< / >< / ><><>美国铁塔< / ><>200.20< / ><>-1.00< / ><>200.20< / ><>100.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.64< / ><>108.70< / >< / ><><>美国铁塔< / ><>175.73< / ><>-2.84< / ><>209.10< / ><>160.06< / ><>3.97< / ><>24.11< / ><>61.98< / >< / ><><>美国金融服务< / ><>580.28< / ><>0.02< / ><>572.06< / ><>432.37< / ><>1.21< / ><>13.35< / ><>491.49< / >< / ><><>AMT Ex公司< / ><>245.20< / ><>3.43< / ><>301.16< / ><>179.24< / ><>0.05< / ><>35.74< / ><>56.21< / >< / ><><>美国运通集团< / ><>200.20< / ><>-1.00< / ><>200.20< / ><>100.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.64< / ><>108.70< / >< / ><><>安费诺A< / ><>161.24< / ><>0.56< / ><>173.82< / ><>110.54< / ><>0.31< / ><>38.41< / ><>109.93< / >< / ><><>亚德诺< / ><>371.80< / ><>-1.86< / ><>445.51< / ><>223.47< / ><>1.18< / ><>43.90< / ><>180.16< / >< / >
A / 353.98 / -0.85 / 380.24 / 304.59 / 0.93 / 19.43 / 75.09 --- / -------- / ------- / -------- / ------ / ------- Apploma Global S.p.A. / 133.67 / 1.51 / 132.27 / 100.00 / 0.00 / 61.19 / 59.76 Apple / 314.45 / 3.55 / 344.57 / 224.69 / 0.34 / 35.78 / 454.55 Applied Materials Inc. / 479.36 / -0.28 / 739.67 / 154.47 / 0.44 / 41.08 / 380.74 Applied Micro devices / 308.11 / -2.43 / 74.65 / 297.50 / 0.00 / 23.59 / 93.80 Airvana / 237.50 / -1.25 / 237.50 / 129.00 / 0.00 / 23.59 / 93.80 Airvana Networks / 202.25 / 1.31 / 214.49 / 114.52 / 0.00 / 62.81 / 255.08 Arthur J. Gallagher / 385.03 / -3.48 / 313.55 / 186.75 / 1.06 / 43.45 / 67.93 AT&T / 25.67 / 0.10 / 29.79 / 196.89 / 4.29 / 8.54 / 177.27 Autodesk / 257.45 / -1.55 / 239.09 / 188.50 / 0.00 / 36.92 / 53.76 Auto Trader / 254.77 / 3.56 / 329.09 / 188.50 / 0.00 / 36.92 / 53.76 Auto Data Processing / 281.39 / -1.39 / 305.31 / 188.16 / 2.45 / 25.65 / 111.79 AucineB / 2899.80 / -28.34 / 4368.11 / 2992.20 / 0.00 / 30.12 / 48.96 Bank of America / 157.68 / -0.57 / 163.69 / 105.52 / 0.00 / 16.88 / 105.52 Bank of New York Mellon / 153.08 / -0.57 / 165.59 / 102.55 / 1.55 / 18.83 / 110.95 Becton Dickinson / 190.21 / 0.43 / 213.08 / 140.11 / 2.21 / 32.79 / 51.81 Berkeley Networks A / 7697.00 / 1582.00 / 6920.00 / 6880.00 / 0.88 / 85.2 / 30.16 BlackRockwell Automation / 167.68 / -0.57 / 167.69 / 100.00 / 0.00 / 62.81 / 255.08 BlackRockwell Finance / 1172.31 / -3.43 / 3219.94 / 917.38 / 1.55 / 27.68 / 181.59 Blackstone / 143.20 / -0.21 / 190.09 / 101.73 / 2.31 / 32.04 / 107.49 Boston / 83.10 / 0.38 / 86.75 / 48.21 / 0.00 / 143.28 / 44.94 Boston Midstream / 212.10 / -0.65 / 233.65 / 146.42 / 0.00 / 14.83 / 108.83 Boston Scientific / 62.23 / -1.30 / 65.22 / 46.12 / 0.00 / 14.14 / 45.16 Booking Holdings / 2088.89 / -4.78 / 5276.18 / 1534.19 / 0.79 / 23.08 / 156.96 Boston Scientific REIT / 48.17 / -1.69 / 105.50 / 422.20 / 0.00 / 19.35 / 68.91 British American Equip / 67.57 / -0.35 / 68.64 / 42.52 / 3.73 / 14.83 / 338.03 Caterpillar / 71.94 / -0.45 / 74.45 / 46.27 / 0.00 / 14.83 / 108.83 Cadence Design Systems / 334.68 / 2.78 / 416.69 / 203.25 / 0.00 / 66.14 / 92.17 Capital One Financial / 217.21 / 0.97 / 29.63 / 174.24 / 1.47 / 11.97 / 133.26 | Carrier | |
Capitotruk / 71.94 / -0.45 / 74.65 / 46.27 / 0.00 / 14.83 / 108.83 Canadigm Group A / 821.93 / 10.64 / 1073.46 / 410.51 / 0.79 / 35.22 / 277.82 CBORE Group A / 156.26 / -1.38 / 174.27 / 131.69 / 0.00 / 36.75 / 43.54 Cencora / 377.79 / -0.27 / 377.54 / 244.82 / 0.73 / 24.23 / 62.55 Cencora Energy / 153.89 / -0.45 / 163.49 / 100.00 / 0.00 / 14.83 / 108.83 Charles Hour Energy / 294.08 / 5.28 / 300.89 / 206.28 / 0.78 / 21.46 / 56.67 Charteria Oceana / 200.31 / 0.32 / 214.71 / 146.49 / 3.56 / 19.21 / 395.57 Chipotle Mexican Oil & Pte / 37.34 / -0.09 / 43.13 / 29.66 / 0.00 / 34.26 / 47.35 Chubb / 243.74 / -1.87 / 267.54 / 166.69 / 0.00 / 24.83 / 108.83 Cognizant / 205.78 / 1.02 / 219.16 / 161.16 / 1.01 / 41.40 / 82.35 Circa Systems / 112.95 / 1.26 / 130.37 / 168.13 / 1.50 / 37.21 / 442.86 Cirgab Inc. / 133.56 / 0.31 / 147.86 / 92.96 / 2.01 / 16.78 / 224.04 Cigna Corp. / 234.85 / -0.65 / 266.75 / 169.89 / 0.00 / 24.83 / 108.83 CNE Energy / 284.98 / 3.66 / 329.16 / 218.31 / 4.02 / 23.71 / 101.03 Cognizant Serv S.p.A. / 62.08 / -0.97 / 87.03 / 37.08 / 2.13 / 13.37 / 27.97 Conazole Global A / 161.78 / -0.38 / 402.26 / 181.11 / 0.00 / 46.97 / 40.50 Conazole Global B / 92.08 / -0.97 / 97.03 / 47.08 / 2.01 / 13.37 / 27.97 Conazole International / 32.10 / 0.10 / 34.45 / 21.29 / 7.48 / 8.69 / 96.27 ConocoPhillips 1B Gas / 1302.13 / -1.23 / 133.88 / 88.57 / 2.57 / 17.28 / 156.91 Constellation Energy / 279.52 / 1.10 / 412.70 / 228.63 / 0.81 / 27.30 / 90.04 ConocoPhillips 2B Gas / 125.67 / -0.57 / 144.55 / 84.55 / 2.57 / 17.28 / 156.91 ConocoPhillips 3B Gas / 152.78 / -0.72 / 268.79 / 176.14 / 0.73 / 68.82 / 131.60 ConocoPhillips 4B Gas / 22.88 / -0.17 / 90.97 / 80.53 / 0.87 / 50.23 / 55.30 Costco Wholesale, Inc. / 958.21 / -3.89 / 1098.50 / 684.23 / 0.61 / 48.02 / 424.02 Costco Holdings, Inc. / 10.52 / -0.09 / 13.89 / 8.69 / 0.00 / 13.89 / 108.83 Cheniere / 97.05 / 0.85 / 131.55 / 92.52 / 1.61 / 19.14 / 64.57
请参阅金融时报网站了解更多详情:www.ftse.com / products / indices / gilts。
© 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC。版权所有。此处包含的Tradeweb FTSE英国国债收盘价信息为Tradeweb专有;未经授权不得复制或再分发;不保证其准确性、完整性或及时性;且不构成投资建议。Tradeweb不对因使用此信息而可能产生的任何损失或损害承担责任。
基本金属< / td>< / tr> <><>铝< / ><>3237.00< / ><>12.00< / >< / > <><>铜< / ><>14298.00< / ><>45.00< / >< / > <><>铅< / ><>1917.50< / ><>7.00< / >< / > <><>镍< / ><>16875.00< / ><>-12.00< / >< / > <><>锡< / ><>55375.00< / ><>548.00< / >< / > <><>锌< / ><>3879.50< / ><>-13.50< / >< / > < / table>
<><>能源< / ><>价格< / ><>变动< / >< / > <><>布伦特原油< / ><>88.93< / ><>0.57< / >< / > <><>天然气< / ><>2.88< / ><>0.04< / >< / > <><>轻质原油< / ><>82.56< / ><>0.33< / >< / > <><>3.5燃料油< / ><>493.24< / ><>0.09< / >< / > <><>欧盟石脑油< / ><>744.43< / ><>0.69< / >< / > < / table>
债券:全球投资级
Tradeweb
<><>农产品< / ><>价格< / ><>变动< / >< / > <><>玉米< / ><>512.25< / ><>-1.75< / >< / > <><>小麦< / ><>210.25< / ><>4.50< / >< / > <><>油菜籽< / ><>541.25< / ><>3.00< / >< / > <><>葵花籽< / ><>10251.00< / ><>-33.00< / >< / > <><>大豆< / ><>1259.00< / ><>4.75< / >< / > <><>豆粕< / ><>330.00< / ><>1.30< / >< / > <><>可可(ICE欧洲)< / ><>4149.00< / ><>-4.00< / >< / > <><>可可(ICE美国)< / ><>6190.00< / ><>373.00< / >< / > <><>咖啡(罗布斯塔)< / ><>3574.00< / ><>-84.00< / >< / > <><>咖啡(阿拉比卡)< / ><>406.00< / ><>-13.65< / >< / > <><>白糖< / ><>514.00< / ><>-3.00< / >< / > <><>糖#11< / ><>17.95< / ><>0.36< / >< / > <><>棉花< / ><>88.91< / ><>1.14< / >< / > <><>橙汁< / ><>138.15< / ><>-2.80< / >< / > <><>枫叶< / ><>4959.56< / ><>27.24< / >< / > <><>活牛< / ><>221.10< / ><>2.63< / >< / > <><>架子牛< / ><>333.78< / ><>1.03< / >< / > <><>瘦猪肉< / ><>80.68< / ><>-0.23< / >< / > <><>棕榈油(马来西亚)< / ><>1177.00< / ><>-0.75< / >< / >
<>< rowspan="2">股票< / >< colspan="7">52周< / >< / > <><>价格±变动< / ><>±周< / ><>±收益率< / ><>±周< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / ><>市值(百万)< / >< / > <><>DHLX< / ><>16.90< / ><>0.43< / ><>18.74< / ><>14.01< / ><>4.51< / ><>16.33< / ><>592.00< / >< / > <><>Oracle< / ><>14.87< / ><>4.11< / ><>14.57< / ><>114.50< / ><>1.34< / ><>25.06< / ><>428.82< / >< / > <><>AT&T汽车< / ><>89.55< / ><>-0.77< / ><>108.72< / ><>80.58< / ><>0.00< / ><>28.34< / ><>72.44< / >< / > <><>中信环球< / ><>73.26< / ><>0.90< / ><>94.56< / ><>69.16< / ><>2.43< / ><>20.56< / ><>27.55< / >< / > <><>伊顿< / ><>145.00< / ><>-0.10< / ><>155.00< / ><>115.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.00< / ><>100.00< / >< / > <><>太平洋< / ><>129.23< / ><>0.01< / ><>139.24< / ><>92.25< / ><>1.08< / ><>27.15< / ><>68.02< / >< / > <><>帕兰提尔系统A< / ><>177.50< / ><>-4.47< / ><>207.52< / ><>106.37< / ><>0.00< / ><>138.76< / ><>408.38< / >< / > <><>帕洛阿尔托网络< / ><>330.31< / ><>-0.59< / ><>338.88< / ><>139.67< / ><>0.00< / ><>285.13< / ><>276.54< / >< / > <><>Paychex< / ><>103.45< / ><>-0.01< / ><>108.85< / ><>83.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>16.88< / ><>114.00< / >< / > <><>Paypal< / >
holdings / 124.88 / -0.11 / 133.83 / 85.45 / 3.81 / 25.49 / 44.42 PayPal Holdings / 61.81 / -0.46 / 79.22 / 38.46 / 0.91 / 11.60 / 52.88 PayPalA / 142.10 / -0.08 / 171.40 / 133.73 / 4.16 / 18.61 / 194.07 Philip Morris Int'l / 109.40 / -0.05 / 118.00 / 85.00 / 0.00 / 16.88 / 114.00 Philip Morris Intl / 194.10 / 0.18 / 207.76 / 142.11 / 3.03 / 27.89 / 302.53 Phillips 66 / 242.23 / 5.33 / 246.95 / 136.74 / 2.10 / 13.78 / 96.65 PHC Financial Services Gp / 244.67 / 0.56 / 256.86 / 136.86 / 3.77 / 32.46 / 97.61 Philips 66 / 223.53 / -0.01 / 235.53 / 134.00 / 3.77 / 32.46 / 97.61 Pepsico / 143.58 / -0.74 / 153.35 / 110.51 / 3.00 / 31.55 / 135.51 Procter & Gamble / 120.24 / -0.04 / 127.72 / 91.89 / 4.66 / 10.84 / 41.48 Public Storage / 377.37 / -5.30 / 335.50 / 205.56 / 3.78 / 30.17 / 59.18 Qualcomm / 183.73 / -0.10 / 200.00 / 146.00 / 3.00 / 25.00 / 100.00 Qualcomm B / 62.26 / -0.57 / 67.54 / 55.66 / 5.22 / 45.45 / 58.91 Regeneron Pharma / 814.73 / -18.77 / 847.60 / 541.00 / 0.46 / 19.46 / 82.41 Republic Services A / 222.18 / -1.22 / 225.16 / 189.41 / 1.21 / 34.47 / 68.03 Robert Islander / 108.54 / -3.55 / 113.65 / 86.00 / 0.00 / 26.64 / 57.95 S&P 500 / 37.56 / -0.01 / 40.00 / 33.88 / 0.00 / 26.64 / 57.95 Roper Technologies / 413.28 / -0.59 / 532.16 / 305.86 / 0.95 / 17.15 / 40.87 ServiceNow Inc / 125.80 / -1.20 / 173.63 / 91.63 / 0.00 / 74.44 / 130.08 Simon Property Group / 271.11 / -1.88 / 238.50 / 172.19 / 4.15 / 15.32 / 70.25 Store&Ap / 215.37 / -1.65 / 241.95 / 118.30 / 0.00 / 91.94 / 109.31 Southern / 56.37 / -0.01 / 63.00 / 43.89 / 3.39 / 21.53 / 103.29 Southern copper / 89.76 / -0.21 / 100.80 / 83.60 / 3.39 / 21.53 / 103.29 Southern copper / 213.75 / -5.95 / 223.86 / 92.94 / 1.85 / 32.09 / 180.48 | Spotify
Starbucks / 108.45 / -0.15 / 118.45 / 84.00 / 0.00 / 24.49 / 113.24 Strategic A / 123.19 / -3.64 / 365.21 / 81.00 / 1.01 / 2.44 / 44.91 Stryker / 226.97 / -0.92 / 396.86 / 261.00 / 1.07 / 33.88 / 126.45 Sympey / 410.00 / 1.21 / 615.79 / 366.00 / 0.00 / 92.97 / 78.51 Target Software / 294.03 / -0.29 / 394.03 / 244.00 / 0.00 / 14.88 / 114.00 Target / 164.04 / 0.57 / 170.75 / 83.44 / 2.83 / 21.58 / 74.52 TE Connectivity / 255.03 / 3.62 / 252.56 / 192.22 / 1.52 / 19.44 / 55.36 Tesla / 345.82 / -4.43 / 408.83 / 297.38 / 0.00 / 250.07 / 1085.83 Texas Instruments / 261.77 / -0.18 / 276.77 / 176.99 / 0.00 / 24.99 / 114.00 The Alcatia / 281.41 / -6.19 / 277.22 / 188.08 / 1.65 / 51.18 / 66.20 The Charles Schwab / 109.38 / -2.98 / 114.53 / 83.96 / 1.17 / 19.82 / 189.17 The Cigna Group / 288.87 / 1.55 / 315.47 / 239.51 / 2.22 / 11.83 / 74.22 The Elec Group / 80.08 / -0.10 / 86.06 / 64.57 / 2.15 / 16.47 / 32.42 The Micron / 58.51 / 0.06 / 76.58 / 54.15 / 2.67 / 34.22 / 35.85 The Danaher Willems / 348.68 / -1.79 / 377.77 / 289.86 / 0.92 / 31.87 / 84.64 The Emerson Techs / 136.83 / -2.65 / 170.00 / 134.75 / 1.48 / 26.31 / 151.16 The Home Corp / 74.47 / -0.13 / 86.55 / 63.45 / 2.46 / 24.99 / 119.99 Thermo Fisher Scientific / 633.73 / 5.56 / 641.00 / 457.27 / 0.30 / 34.05 / 234.31 T-Mobile US / 179.61 / -2.00 / 258.66 / 165.66 / 2.27 / 18.75 / 192.66 Trane Technologies / 463.40 / 8.15 / 536.97 / 348.09 / 0.91 / 35.13 / 101.96 Unumis Reit Group Inc / 1337.56 / -1.89 / 1466.59 / 934.68 / 1.35 / 24.99 / 114.00 United States Finl / 371.15 / 1.49 / 389.68 / 252.26 / 1.35 / 9.83 / 77.41 Truist Financials / 50.67 / 0.37 / 56.20 / 40.78 / 4.19 / 11.40 / 61.90 Uber Technologies / 78.49 / -1.86 / 101.98 / 65.41 / 0.00 / 16.99 / 160.32 | Union | |
United States Telecom B / 263.58 / -0.99 / 277.77 / 179.99 / 0.00 / 16.88 / 114.00 United States Telecom B / 657.68 / 4.52 / 717.19 / 501.59 / 0.73 / 25.38 / 65.83 UnitedHealth Group / 401.01 / 4.42 / 461.67 / 259.57 / 2.31 / 25.71 / 359.84 US Bancorp / 62.80 / 0.38 / 66.08 / 45.02 / 3.31 / 12.53 / 91.85 Vale on Paper Corp / 221.94 / -0.49 / 237.99 / 149.99 / 0.75 / 24.99 / 114.00 Verizon Communications / 50.19 / -0.06 / 51.68 / 10.60 / 5.54 / 13.07 / 208.53 Vertex Media Group A / 38.27 / -0.60 / 59.00 / 27.17 / 3.82 / 0.00 / 5.45 Vertex Pharmaceuticals / 547.26 / -5.55 / 556.69 / 373.47 / 0.00 / 31.62 / 136.72 Visa / 263.58 / -0.39 / 277.77 / 179.99 / 0.00 / 16.88 / 114.00 Viacom A / 140.02 / -1.00 / 219.82 / 132.66 / 0.66 / 23.34 / 47.00 Walmart / 104.34 / -1.04 / 135.16 / 89.42 / 0.95 / 36.61 / 830.35 Wal-Mart Stores / 121.23 / -0.62 / 171.78 / 92.19 / 1.37 / 22.51 / 189.30 Wells Fargo / 85.23 / -0.44 / 97.76 / 72.38 / 2.35 / 12.25 / 257.74 Wichoworme / 241.56 / 0.41 / 255.20 / 163.75 / 1.41 / 105.03 / 174.10 Workday A / 190.75 / -3.67 / 249.65 / 153.06 / 0.00 / 58.06 / 38.34 Workday B / 135.37 / -0.49 / 166.88 / 109.99 / 0.00 / 34.98 / 136.37 Yum! Brands Inc / 154.41 / -1.86 / 170.14 / 137.33 / 1.94 / 19.33 / 42.14 Zscaler A / 77.52 / 0.23 / 156.49 / 77.01 / 2.73 / 12.65 / 302.83
资料来源:能源:NYMEX。基本金属:伦敦金属交易所。玉米、小麦、大豆:CBOT。活牛、育肥牛、瘦猪肉:CME。
| 美元 | | | | | | | Morgan Stanley / 30 / 01 / 4.00 / 98.97 / 4.57 / 0.00 / 0.05 Trust Finl Corp / 28 / 06 / 4.12 / 99.63 / 5.12 / -0.04 / -0.03 National Rural / 32 / 11 / 4.02 / 94.55 / 5.27 / 0.00 / 0.15 Washington Gaslight Co / 36 / 03 / 5.78 / 91.97 / 5.02 / 0.00 Northern States Power / 28 / 03 / 8.13 / 100.66 / 5.05 / 0.00 Oklahoma Gas & Elec / 28 / 04 / 6.50 / 103.01 / 4.58 / 0.00
德国 / 25 / 08 / 2.22 / 89.34 / 2.89 / -0.05 / 0.03 西班牙 / 46 / 10 / 2.88 / 82.64 / 4.19 / -0.17 / 0.13 比利时 / 47 / 06 / 1.50 / 61.58 / 4.47 / -0.15 / 0.29 法国 / 48 / 05 / 2.00 / 63.51 / 4.72 / -0.14 / 0.14 | 英镑 | | | | | | | 英国 / 46 / 12 / 4.25 / 82.90 / 5.68 / 0.10 英国 / 47 / 07 / 1.50 / 48.74 / 5.74 / 0.06
波动率指数 债券:基准政府债券
VIX / 14.52 / -0.69 / 15.21 / 35.30 / 13.38 VXD / 13.12 / -0.54 / 13.66 / 42.71 / 2.43 VDAX / 16.36 / 0.34 / 16.03 / 35.58 / 13.53
到期日 / 票息 / 买入价 / 买入收益率 / 日收益率变化 / 周收益率变化 / 月收益率变化 / 年变化 澳大利亚 / 06 / 54 / 4.75 / 88.01 / 5.61 / 0.04 / 0.06 / 0.09 / 0.36 澳大利亚 / 04 / 27 / 4.75 / 100.02 / 4.71 / 0.06 / 0.13 / 0.08 / 1.34 奥地利 / 03 / 33 / 2.88 / 97.99 / 3.25 / 0.00 / 0.01 / 0.12 / 0.37 奥地利 / 10 / 51 / 3.13 / 86.20 / 3.99 / 0.02 / 0.00 / 0.13 / 0.15 比利时 / 06 / 54 / 3.25 / 79.70 / 4.61 / 0.02 / -0.02 / 0.15 / 0.33 加拿大 / 06 / 27 / 1.00 / 98.88 / 2.82 / 0.00 / 0.03 / -0.18 加拿大 / 10 / 55 / 2.75 / 77.09 / 3.93 / 0.00 / 0.01 / 0.15 丹麦 / 11 / 33 / 2.25 / 95.59 / 2.78 / 0.00 / -0.05 / 0.20 丹麦 / 11 / 49 / 4.50 / 113.60 / 3.20 / 0.02 / -0.02 / 0.07 / 0.27 芬兰 / 09 / 27 / 0.50 / 97.62 / 2.83 / 0.02 / 0.00 / 0.05 / 0.69 芬兰 / 09 / 33 / 3.00 / 97.99 / 3.32 / 0.01 / -0.01 / 0.10 / 0.34 法国 / 05 / 54 / 3.00 / 72.23 / 4.84 / 0.01 / -0.01 / 0.21 / 0.40 法国 / 11 / 33 / 3.50 / 98.49 / 3.74 / 0.01 / -0.02 / -0.76 / -0.46 德国 / 08 / 33 / 2.60 / 96.98 / 3.08 / 0.02 / 0.00 / 0.11 / 0.38 德国 / 08 / 53 / 1.75 / 67.18 / 3.76 / 0.03 / 0.01 / 0.15 / 0.27 希腊 / 06 / 28 / 3.88 / 101.33 / 3.09 / 0.14 / 0.13 / 0.19 / 0.65 希腊 / 06 / 33 / 4.25 / 103.40 / 3.67 / 0.02 / 0.11 / 0.08 / 0.39 爱尔兰 / 10 / 33 / 0.25 / 84.23 / 3.23 / 0.10 / -0.05 / 0.25 / 0.60 意大利 / 12 / 27 / 2.63 / 99.68 / 2.92 / 0.01 / 0.04 / 0.68 意大利 / 03 / 34 / 4.13 / 102.75 / 3.81 / 0.02 / 0.00 / 0.12 / 0.50
07 / 33 / 2.50 / 95.99 / 3.16 / 0.01 / -0.01 / 0.09 / 0.36 波兰 / 04 / 28 / 2.75 / 97.59 / 4.29 / 0.14 / 0.00 / 0.16 / 0.44 10 / 33 / 6.00 / 102.10 / 5.63 / 0.05 / -0.02 / 0.25 / 0.70 葡萄牙 / 07 / 28 / 1.63 / 91.71 / 3.20 / 0.02 / 0.00 / 0.10 / 0.42 西班牙 / 10 / 52 / 1.88 / 62.48 / 4.32 / 0.01 / 0.00 / 0.14 / 0.28 10 / 33 / 3.50 / 100.87 / 3.41 / 0.01 / -0.01 / 0.10 / 0.35 瑞典 / 11 / 33 / 1.15 / 96.35 / 4.50 / 0.00 / 0.14 瑞士 / 03 / 36 / 2.50 / 119.99 / 0.32 / 0.00 / -0.02 / -0.22 / 0.49 英国 / 06 / 28 / 0.00 / 92.72 / 4.34 / 0.02 / -0.01 / -0.04 / 0.58 10 / 53 / 3.75 / 72.36 / 5.78 / -0.01 / -0.05 / 0.07 / 0.56 美国 / 11 / 33 / 4.50 / 99.88 / 4.52 / -0.01 / -0.04 / 0.55 11 / 51 / 4.75 / 93.34 / 5.21 / -0.01 / -0.07 / 0.04 / 0.38
英国国债:现金市场
Tr 1.25pc '27 / 97.45 / 1.28 / 4.21 / 0.01 / 0.06 / 97.50 / 95.36 Tr 0.875pc '29 / 89.70 / 0.98 / 4.41 / -0.02 / 0.14 / 91.00 / 0.01 1pc '32 / 82.70 / 1.21 / 4.64 / -0.04 / 0.17 / 85.07 / 81.01 4.25pc '36 / 93.98 / 4.52 / 5.05 / -0.06 / 0.26 / 99.39 / 92.65 4.5pc '42 / 88.95 / 5.06 / 5.54 / -0.05 / 0.37 / 96.45 / 87.54 3.75pc '52 / 73.24 / 5.12 / 5.75 / 0.01 / 0.51 / 81.50 / 72.00 4pc '60 / 74.38 / 5.38 / 5.73 / — / 0.54 / 83.52 / 73.28
注:收盘价、最高价与最低价以交易货币计价。市值以本地货币计算。最高价与最低价基于52周滚动周期。
英国国债:金融时报精算指数
固定利息价格指数 / 8月27日 / 日涨跌% / 总回报 / 月回报 / 年回报 / 收益率 5年以下 / 84.77 / -0.04 / 2681.79 / 0.36 / 1.25 / 4.42 5-10年 / 143.81 / -0.08 / 3404.73 / 0.19 / -0.33 / 4.87 10-15年 / 142.25 / -0.11 / 3739.51 / -0.09 / -1.66 / 5.32 5-15年 / 141.71 / -0.09 / 3476.69 / 0.10 / -0.75 / 5.05 15年以上 / 165.50 / -0.09 / 3303.27 / -0.64 / -5.06 / 5.69 全部股票 / 125.46 / -0.06 / 3143.39 / 0.02 / -1.07 / 5.30
指数联动 / 8月27日 / 当日涨跌% / 月涨跌% / 年涨跌% / 总回报 / 1个月 / 1年回报 5年以下 / 362.83 / 0.07 / 0.63 / 2.14 / 3165.98 / 0.64 / 2.95 5年以上 / 468.09 / 0.09 / 0.53 / -2.12 / 3683.67 / 0.54 / -1.69 5-15年 / 458.77 / 0.13 / 0.70 / 1.30 / 3847.47 / 0.71 / 1.86 15年以上 / 465.44 / 0.05 / 0.33 / -5.39 / 3510.09 / 0.34 / -5.07 所有股票 / 465.77 / 0.09 / 0.57 / -1.27 / 3722.23 / 0.58 / -0.77
5年 / 4.59 / 4.57 / 4.26 10年 / 5.09 / 5.07 / 4.59 15年 / 5.44 / 5.43 / 4.88 20年 / 5.62 / 5.61 / 5.02 45年 / 5.56 / 5.55 / 4.91
实际收益率(0%通胀) / 8月27日 / 期限(年) / 先前值 / 去年同期 5年以下 / 1.02 / 2.71 / 1.04 / 0.73 5年以上 / 2.31 / 16.31 / 2.31 / 1.90 5-15年 / 1.97 / 9.55 / 1.98 / 1.61 15年以上 / 2.45 / 23.05 / 2.46 / 2.01 所有股票 / 2.25 / 13.42 / 2.26 / 1.86
实际收益率(5%通胀) / 8月27日 / 期限(年) / 先前值 / 去年同期 5年以下 / 0.74 / 2.71 / 0.76 / 0.43 5年以上 / 2.27 / 16.31 / 2.28 / 1.88 5-15年 / 1.90 / 9.55 / 1.91 / 1.54 15年以上 / 2.43 / 23.05 / 2.43 / 2.00 所有股票 / 2.20 / 13.42 / 2.21 / 1.82
利润。权力。政治。
Fisher (J) / 436.00 / -5.00 / 554.00 / 325.00 / - / -50.11 / 100.24
最高 / 最低 / 收益率 | 航空航天与国防 | | | | | | | | BAE Systems / 2092.00 / 4.00 / 2360.00 / 1529.00 / 1.81 / 30.41 / 5403.93 Chemring Group / 561.00 / 4.00 / 650.75 / 446.52 / 1.44 / 31.52 / 892.62 | 汽车与零部件 | | | | | | | | Ford Motors / 1035.89 / 12.97 / 1319.04 / 841.76 / 4.26 / -5.91 / -- | 银行 | | | | | | | | ANZ Group / 1930.48 / -18.00 / 2126.50 / 1590.55 / 5.97 / 19.73 / 3482.69 Banco Santander / 1070.00 / -20.00 / 1122.00 / 689.00 / 1.56 / 13.71 / 3855.47 BASF Securities, Scotia / 6838.80 / -61.62 / 6977.60 / 4559.15 / 3.55 / -- / -882.84 Barclays / 4922.60 / -6.95 / 554.10 / 352.85 / 2.33 / 11.25 / 23155.85 Canadian Imperial / 8397.21 / -281.08 / 9198.88 / 5444.83 / 2.71 / -- / 1427.74 HSBC / 1504.00 / -18.20 / 1610.00 / 942.80 / 3.67 / 16.89 / 14589.63 Hancock Grp / 13360.00 / -10.10 / 16240.80 / 11065.00 / 2.39 / 9.41 / 50.63 Lloyds Bngs Gp. / 1039.30 / -2.40 / 117.90 / 77.38 / 3.67 / 15.61 / 135410.10 NatWest Group / 678.40 / -13.60 / 726.00 / 500.20 / 5.16 / 12.68 / 13321.31 OIB Group / 512.50 / 2.00 / 647.50 / 478.00 / 7.00 / 6.78 / 1032.46 PPLB Group / 2528.00 / -0.33 / 2613.80 / 1529.29 / 0.62 / 6.46 / 211.05 Royal Bank of CA / 14998.50 / -263.99 / 16187.03 / 15032.21 / 2.49 / -- / 1291.15 Stand Chart / 2147.00 / -35.00 / 2278.00 / 1351.30 / 2.58 / 14.92 / 6715.77 *3.75%UP / 112.25 / 0.25 / 128.64 / 109.50 / 6.57 / -- / 69.45 S&P 500 / 129.35 / -1.00 / 143.90 / 125.00 / 6.38 / -- / 67.63 Toronto-Dominion / 8824.79 / 37.91 / 9256.88 / 5736.30 / 2.61 / -- / 1643.53 Westpac / 1783.28 / -0.87 / 2275.39 / 1755.74 / 4.57 / 16.76 / 3504.56
Elementis● / 175.00 / -4.60 / 195.40 / 136.00 / 1.90 / -30.47 / 1351.12 Johnson Matthey● / 2226.00 / -40.00 / 3245.25 / 2224.00 / 4.61 / -29.19 / 442.79 Victrex / 836.00 / 6.00 / 841.00 / 515.00 / 7.12 / 26.12 / 214.92 | 建筑与材料 | | | | | | | |
吉利福德控股< / td><>614.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>640.00< / ><>407.50< / ><>3.26< / ><>18.22< / ><>207.00< / >< / tr> <><>摩根辛克莱< / ><>4388.00< / ><>-52.00< / ><>5730.00< / ><>3915.00< / ><>3.71< / ><>11.79< / ><>65.10< / >< / > <>< colspan="8">电子电气设备< / >< / > <><>discoverE集团< / ><>822.00< / ><>21.00< / ><>840.00< / ><>505.00< / ><>1.58< / ><>27.22< / ><>213.67< / >< / > <><>哈尔玛< / ><>3672.00< / ><>56.00< / ><>4902.00< / ><>3194.00< / ><>0.67< / ><>37.25< / ><>535.31< / >< / > <><>摩根先进材料< / ><>237.50< / ><>-3.50< / ><>261.00< / ><>179.80< / ><>5.14< / ><>31.67< / ><>1136.12< / >< / > <><>牛津仪器< / ><>2856.00< / ><>36.00< / ><>3318.00< / ><>1682.00< / ><>0.83< / ><>33.76< / ><>83.33< / >< / > <><>雷尼绍< / ><>5145.00< / ><>25.00< / ><>5490.00< / ><>3110.00< / ><>1.52< / ><>44.66< / ><>45.31< / >< / > <><>TT电子< / ><>135.00< / ><>-< / ><>154.80< / ><>93.00< / ><>-< / ><>-4.74< / ><>78.05< / >< / > <><>XP电源< / ><>1862.00< / ><>60.00< / ><>2060.00< / ><>843.00< / ><>-< / ><>-44.33< / ><>232.43< / >< / > < / table>
<>< colspan="7">金融综合< / >< / > <><>3i集团< / ><>2834.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>4497.00< / ><>18525.00< / ><>2.98< / ><>--< / >< / > <><>阿伯丁集团< / ><>251.00< / ><>1.40< / ><>265.00< / ><>177.52< / ><>5.62< / ><>11.62< / >< / > <><>桥石集团< / ><>318.80< / ><>4.00< / ><>351.80< / ><>212.00< / ><>2.98< / ><>63.76< / >< / > <><>开罗集团< / ><>496.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>496.00< / ><>248.00< / ><>6.63< / ><>18.80< / >< / > <><>克洛斯兄弟< / ><>413.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>556.15< / ><>318.40< / ><>--< / ><>6.17< / >< / > <><>ICICI< / ><>2008.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>2340.00< / ><>1243.47< / ><>4.33< / ><>12.04< / >< / > <><>英富曼+< / ><>645.00< / ><>5.50< / ><>690.00< / ><>498.36< / ><>5.97< / ><>8.37< / >< / > <><>丘柏+< / ><>172.60< / ><>-0.20< / ><>214.50< / ><>113.40< / ><>3.48< / ><>8.99< / >< / > <><>狮子信托< / ><>318.50< / ><>-1.00< / ><>318.50< / ><>103.00< / ><>5.97< / ><>20.68< / >< / > <><>伦敦证券交易所< / ><>8980.00< / ><>292.00< / ><>10140.00< / ><>6684.00< / ><>1.76< / ><>37.67< / >< / > <><>雷博内斯集团< / ><>1710.00< / ><>10.00< / ><>2500.00< / ><>1568.00< / ><>5.85< / ><>15.85< / >< / > <><>S & U< / ><>1975.00< / ><>10.00< / ><>2458.50< / ><>1620.00< / ><>5.82< / ><>10.12< / >< / > <><>施罗德< / ><>584.00< / ><>6.50< / ><>599.50< / ><>359.60< / ><>3.77< / ><>17.13< / >< / > <><>邦斯 / 上市公司< / ><>1176.50< / ><>-5.50< / ><>12575.50< / ><>1028.75< / ><>1.53< / ><>11.76< / >< / > <><>TP ICAP集团< / ><>339.80< / ><>2.60< / ><>355.00< / ><>235.50< / ><>5.08< / ><>13.48< / >< / > <><>瓦尔奎斯银行集团< / ><>79.50< / ><>-0.50< / ><>132.00< / ><>75.00< / ><>< / ><>24.84< / >< / > < / table>
最高 / 最低 / 派息率 / 市盈率 | 航空航天与国防 | | | | | | | | Cohort* / 1236.00 / 20.00 / 1538.00 / 881.10 / 1.45 / 23.66 / 70.04 Velocity Composites / 19.50 / 0.25 / 25.00 / 12.00 / - / -9.25 / 31.96 | 电力资源(百万欧元) | | | | | | | | Cropper J / $15.00 / 35.00 / $25.00 / 230.00 / - / 16.72 / 29.07 | 建筑与材料 | | | | | | | | Accsys Tech / 69.20 / -1.50 / 79.84 / 58.10 / - / 30.23 / 24.52 | 电子与电气设备 | | | | | | | | Checklist / 20.00 / - / 27.00 / 12.35 / - / -7.69 / 26.30 LPA / 77.50 / - / 90.00 / 34.00 / - / -29.36 / 1.26 Thorpe FW / 260.00 / -2.50 / 320.00 / 240.00 / 2.76 / 11.99 / 30.64 | 金融综合 | | | | | | | | Arbutnot Banking‡ / 810.00 / -10.00 / 1104.38 / 765.00 / 6.79 / 7.42 / 16.76
投资公司
最高 / 最低 / 派息率 | 传统型(不含私募股权) | | | | | | | | 3i Infra / 395.50 / 2.00 / 399.50 / 325.00 / 3.40 / 403.96 / -1.96 Alt GVIIT / 91.75 / 1.25 / 96.77 / 76.00 / 6.65 / 102.24 / -10.70 AEP Inc / 1775.00 / 0.00 / 1788.00 / 1088.07 / 2.89 / 155.27 / -10.10 Aberdeen Asia Foc / 450.00 / 2.00 / 464.00 / 342.00 / 1.43 / 495.58 / -9.16 Aberdeen Asian Inc Fund / 319.00 / 2.00 / 357.00 / 236.00 / 5.88 / 341.37 / -7.49 Aberdeen Eq Inc / 459.00 / -8.00 / 473.00 / 359.25 / 5.03 / 462.08 / 0.19 Aberdeen UK Smil / 529.00 / — / 539.00 / 441.50 / 2.65 / 579.40 / -8.01 Alliance Witan / 1373.00 / -9.00 / 1394.00 / 1178.00 / 2.14 / 1445.51 / -5.32 Asht Tech / 699.00 / 13.00 / 764.00 / 688.00 / 16.25 / 632.85 / -6.68 Artemis UK Future Lead / 402.00 / 0.00 / 405.00 / 321.00 / 3.84 / 443.73 / -9.91 | Aurora UK
AVI Japan / 173.00 / 1.00 / 194.00 / 154.50 / 1.27 / 179.31 / -2.89 / - BG China Growth / 307.50 / -1.00 / 331.04 / 277.00 / 0.81 / 336.77 / -9.02 / - BG Euro / 126.50 / — / 133.00 / 91.40 / 0.57 / 137.08 / -7.71 / - United Kingdom / 1066.00 / -2.00 / 1090.00 / 811.10 / 0.94 / 1179.34 / -9.69 / - Shin / 172.60 / 0.80 / 176.00 / 123.05 / 0.40 / 190.54 / -10.71 / - US Growth / 337.00 / -4.50 / 369.50 / 261.00 / — / 355.83 / -6.61 / - Bailie Gifford UK / 227.00 / -1.00 / 231.00 / 180.12 / 2.73 / 250.75 / -9.56 / - Bankers IT / 151.00 / 0.80 / 154.80 / 121.79 / 1.87 / 164.49 / -8.91 / - Biotech Growth / 1768.00 / 22.00 / 1786.00 / 876.00 / — / 1882.92 / -6.54 / - BlackRock Smir / 280.00 / -2.00 / 289.50 / 251.00 / 5.32 / 277.08 / -14.95 / - BCKR Energy & Res / 186.50 / — / 205.00 / 123.00 / 3.11 / 195.31 / -4.58 / - BCKR Front / 193.50 / 1.50 / 208.00 / 164.50 / 3.93 / 195.28 / -1.49 / - GEur / 607.00 / -4.00 / 625.00 / 506.95 / 1.18 / 654.24 / -6.52 / - BIG / 231.00 / -3.00 / 240.00 / 200.00 / 3.33 / 263.46 / -11.02 / - Smir / 277.00 / -1.50 / 288.40 / 238.60 / 2.86 / 318.13 / -12.38 / - BOKFIELD World Mining / 1048.00 / -14.00 / 1072.00 / 844.00 / 2.29 / 1173.88 / -4.80 / - Brunner / 1566.00 / -8.00 / 1584.00 / 1336.00 / 1.72 / 1749.89 / -10.35 / - Caledonia Inv / 397.00 / 2.00 / 402.00 / 312.00 / 1.94 / 584.38 / -33.09 / - CanGen C$ / 2628.46 / -45.41 / 2864.58 / 2238.75 / 2.33 / 364.48 / -42.38 / - City of Lon / 589.00 / -4.00 / 599.00 / 486.00 / 3.76 / 562.34 / 1.77 / - CCG NetRes / 400.00 / 5.00 / 467.00 / 208.33 / 6.58 / 437.84 / 3.89 / - CCT Healthcare / 138.60 / -1.21 / 152.40 / 124.40 / 3.85 / 140.66 / -6.21 / - CT Mgd / 131.00 / — / 135.00 / 114.00 / 6.11 / 134.18 / -2.14 / 。
CT CpM / 358.00 / -3.00 / 373.00 / 320.00 / 3.72 / 378.22 / -4.34 / - CT UK HIT 8 / 109.00 / — / 120.00 / 92.00 / 5.47 / 120.96 / -10.09 / - CT UK HIT Oid / 119.00 / — / 126.00 / 97.00 / 5.01 / 120.98 / -1.76 / - EQT Group Inc / 317.00 / -4.00 / 323.00 / 255.00 / 6.36 / 347.24 / -7.43 / - Edinburgh Inv / 859.00 / -4.00 / 867.00 / 737.60 / 3.73 / 928.53 / -7.30 / -
The Euro SmCo / 240.00 / 1.50 / 247.21 / 193.80 / 5.27 / 264.00 / -9.86 / - F&C Inv Trust / 342.50 / -0.40 / 332.00 / 325.80 / 1.22 / 374.89 / -8.58 / - Fiatry Global Inc / 624.00 / -0.85 / 672.50 / 541.06 / 3.29 / 617.63 / -4.89 / - Fidelity China / 262.50 / -0.50 / 339.00 / 241.01 / 3.43 / 282.68 / -7.44 / - Fidelity EnerMkts / 1502.00 / 2.00 / 1574.00 / 836.00 / 1.32 / 1597.16 / -5.98 / - Fidelity Euro / 437.50 / -3.50 / 447.50 / 367.50 / 2.26 / 462.80 / -4.86 / -
价格± / 52周 / 成交量(千) 最高 / 最低 / 派息率 / 市盈率 | 食品与饮料 | | | | | | AEP Plantations / 195.20 / -0.40 / 229.00 / 117.37 / 3.12 / 11.46 Assoc. Brit Foods / 2064.00 / -15.00 / 2359.00 / 1729.45 / 3.05 / 14.58 Ban (AS) / 600.00 / -0.00 / 715.32 / 499.00 / 3.12 / 14.10 Fevara / 140.50 / 1.50 / 149.50 / 114.50 / 1.71 / 6.08 Coca-Cola HBC / 4564.00 / -102.00 / 5195.00 / 3270.00 / 2.25 / 20.59 Cranovskl. / 5380.00 / - / 5810.00 / 4755.00 / 2.09 / 18.18 Diageo / 1701.50 / -35.00 / 2109.00 / 1295.50 / 2.16 / 29.59 Carmara / 264.60 / -0.60 / 307.50 / 191.10 / 0.96 / 20.06 Kerry Group / 7253.71 / 228.24 / 7646.35 / 5567.81 / 1.70 / 21.14 Tate & Lyle / 554.50 / - / 580.00 / 319.43 / 3.57 / 25.20 Unilever*. / 4752.00 / -20.00 / 5542.11 / 3644.00 / 3.47 / 12.80
GN Store Nord< / td><>1102.65< / ><>25.93< / ><>1429.97< / ><>984.75< / ><>14.16< / ><>685.75< / >< / tr> <><>Smith&Neph< / ><>1072.50< / ><>1.50< / ><>1441.50< / ><>1046.00< / ><>2.73< / ><>20.202.948.64< / >< / > <>< colspan="7">房屋、休闲与个人用品< / >< / > <><>Barratt Redrow< / ><>319.50< / ><>2.70< / ><>410.29< / ><>235.40< / ><>5.35< / ><>23.497.017< / >< / > <><>Bellway< / ><>2168.00< / ><>34.00< / ><>2890.00< / ><>1715.00< / ><>3.32< / ><>16.31.268< / >< / > <><>Caterpillar< / ><>3542.00< / ><>1.79< / ><>4442.00< / ><>2866.00< / ><>-< / ><>206.71.068.71< / >< / > <><>Berberry Group< / ><>1072.00< / ><>16.00< / ><>1376.50< / ><>976.00< / ><>-< / ><>906.71.068.71< / >< / > <><>Cairn Homes< / ><>221.00< / ><>-< / ><>228.00< / ><>161.00< / ><>3.88< / ><>12.10.91.82< / >< / > <><>BlackRock WorksHops< / ><>16320.00< / ><>480.00< / ><>2,540.00< / ><>14570.00< / ><>31.34< / ><>29.38.50.00< / >< / > <><>Gleeson (MJ)< / ><>277.00< / ><>2.50< / ><>435.00< / ><>221.00< / ><>3.97< / ><>10.22.13.04< / >< / > <><>Headlam Group< / ><>9.32< / ><>1.13< / ><>76.00< / ><>4.64< / ><>0.09< / ><>987.41.00< / >< / > <><>McBride< / ><>167.40< / ><>0.80< / ><>172.66< / ><>108.20< / ><>1.79< / ><>8.58.110.30< / >< / > <><>McKesson< / ><>1980.00< / ><>1.79< / ><>2413.40< / ><>1708.30< / ><>3.66< / ><>45.44.1448.88< / >< / > <><>PZ Cussons< / ><>103.60< / ><>1.40< / ><>114.00< / ><>65.00< / ><>3.57< / ><>22.04.43.00< / >< / > <><>Vistry Group< / ><>303.00< / ><>10.80< / ><>746.40< / ><>220.00< / ><>7.18< / ><>22022.88< / >< / > < / table>
<><>Coats Group< / ><>81.95< / ><>0.25< / ><>98.10< / ><>73.15< / ><>2.99< / ><>18.83< / ><>1681.65< / >< / > <><>Macfarlane< / ><>74.20< / ><>0.20< / ><>99.00< / ><>59.80< / ><>4.93< / ><>18.60< / ><>386.08< / >< / > <><>Smiths< / ><>2626.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>2754.18< / ><>2088.00< / ><>1.78< / ><>30.64< / ><>624.14< / >< / > <>< colspan="8">工业运输< / >< / > < / table>
<>< colspan="8">保险< / >< / > <><>Admiral Group< / ><>4076.00< / ><>52.00< / ><>4128.00< / ><>2624.00< / ><>3.52< / ><>16.54< / ><>1136.79< / >< / > <><>Aviva< / ><>722.00< / ><>7.20< / ><>740.60< / ><>590.60< / ><>5.57< / ><>26.84< / ><>3437.13< / >< / > <><>Chesnara< / ><>359.00< / ><>9.50< / ><>359.50< / ><>264.58< / ><>6.40< / ><>71.09< / ><>1608.57< / >< / > <><>Ecclesiastical Insurance< / ><>140.25< / ><>0.75< / ><>155.00< / ><>135.00< / ><>6.15< / ><>—< / ><>41.53< / >< / > <><>Hansard Global< / ><>51.75< / ><>0.75< / ><>57.00< / ><>43.20< / ><>8.60< / ><>39.81< / ><>1.34< / >< / > <><>Hiscox< / ><>1835.00< / ><>—< / ><>1904.00< / ><>1257.18< / ><>2.11< / ><>13.79< / ><>909.09< / >< / > <><>Lancashire Hldgs< / ><>615.00< / ><>4.50< / ><>700.00< / ><>549.00< / ><>2.73< / ><>6.90< / ><>414.93< / >< / > <><>Legal & General*< / ><>291.20< / ><>0.10< / ><>318.10< / ><>217.20< / ><>7.52< / ><>29.15< / ><>19919.31< / >< / > <><>Old Mutual< / ><>58.40< / ><>0.40< / ><>78.80< / ><>54.00< / ><>6.95< / ><>6.44< / ><>75.50< / >< / > <><>Prudential< / ><>1013.50< / ><>26.00< / ><>1238.00< / ><>910.20< / ><>2.02< / ><>8.93< / ><>10045.62< / >< / > <><>Standard Life< / ><>929.50< / ><>6.00< / ><>948.50< / ><>615.00< / ><>5.96< / ><>197.35< / ><>962.85< / >< / >
< / td>< rowspan="2">价格< / >< ="2">日涨跌< / >< colspan="3">52周< / >< ="2">收益率< / >< ="2">市盈率< / >< ="2">成交量(千股)< / >< / tr> <><>最高< / ><>最低< / >< / > <><>BP Marsh< / ><>680.00< / ><>-< / ><>710.00< / ><>613.00< / ><>5.34< / ><>5.13< / ><>7.12< / >< / > <><>Burlap Capital< / ><>322.80< / ><>5.40< / ><>1054.00< / ><>279.80< / ><>2.92< / ><>15.12< / ><>115.59< / >< / > <><>Premier Group (集团)< / ><>39.60< / ><>0.85< / ><>67.00< / ><>34.53< / ><>7.58< / ><>50.77< / ><>161.16< / >< / > <>< colspan="9">食品与饮料< / >< / > <><>Camellia< / ><>5650.00< / ><>-< / ><>6300.00< / ><>4800.00< / ><>4.60< / ><>-30.26< / ><>0.13< / >< / > <><>Fevertree Drinks< / ><>853.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>973.00< / ><>711.00< / ><>2.03< / ><>45.42< / ><>170.39< / >< / > <><>Nichols< / ><>1155.00< / ><>-< / ><>1250.00< / ><>880.00< / ><>3.37< / ><>19.69< / ><>35.12< / >< / > <>< colspan="9">房屋、休闲与个人用品< / >< / > <><>Churchill< / ><>370.00< / ><>-< / ><>460.00< / ><>271.00< / ><>5.66< / ><>9.32< / ><>5.00< / >< / > <><>Frontier Dev< / ><>416.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>588.56< / ><>302.00< / ><>-< / ><>9.81< / ><>102.66< / >< / > <><>Portmeira< / ><>53.00< / ><>-< / ><>138.00< / ><>47.14< / ><>-< / ><>-1.11< / ><>51.94< / >< / > <><>Sanderson Design Grp< / ><>77.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>80.00< / ><>40.00< / ><>1.95< / ><>25.84< / ><>335.04< / >< / > <>< colspan="9">工业工程< / >< / > <><>MS Int< / ><>1690.00< / ><>-< / ><>1800.00< / ><>1120.00< / ><>1.54< / ><>25.07< / ><>5.09< / >< / > < / table>
<><>价格< / ><>日涨跌< / >< colspan="3">52周< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / ><>股息率< / >< / > <><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / >< / > <><>Fidelity Spec< / ><>473.50< / ><>-3.00< / ><>479.50< / ><>372.00< / ><>2.18< / ><>473.42< / ><>0.66< / >< / > <><>Finsbury G&I< / ><>834.00< / ><>5.00< / ><>902.00< / ><>706.25< / ><>2.42< / ><>807.64< / ><>-6.74< / >< / > <><>Finsale Oil & Gas Co< / ><>194.00< / ><>-4.60< / ><>198.00< / ><>162.72< / ><>1.62< / ><>203.51< / ><>-5.40< / >< / > <><>GRTI (supp)< / ><>1.25< / ><>-< / ><>1.25< / ><>-< / ><>14.40< / ><>-91.32< / >< / > <><>Hansa< / ><>332.00< / ><>-6.00< / ><>346.00< / ><>250.00< / ><>1.33< / ><>543.81< / ><>-38.94< / >< / > <><>Hansa A< / ><>325.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>335.00< / ><>244.00< / ><>1.35< / ><>543.81< / ><>-40.23< / >< / > <><>Hen FarEs< / ><>261.00< / ><>-2.50< / ><>281.50< / ><>229.00< / ><>9.60< / ><>252.48< / ><>4.43< / >< / > <><>Hen High Inc< / ><>208.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>214.00< / ><>173.35< / ><>5.35< / ><>219.08< / ><>-4.38< / >< / > < / table>
Smir< / td> 967.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>998.00< / ><>850.00< / ><>2.94< / ><>1072.09< / ><>-8.22< / ><>< / >< / tr> <>汉高< / ><>2980.00< / ><>30.00< / ><>3290.73< / ><>2285.00< / ><>-< / ><>3330.66< / ><>-9.63< / ><>< / >< / ><><>HICL基础设施< / ><>136.20< / ><>-3.20< / ><>141.00< / ><>107.20< / ><>6.24< / ><>159.43< / ><>-13.32< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Impax环境< / ><>448.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>494.76< / ><>379.00< / ><>1.14< / ><>507.23< / ><>-12.07< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Indiotech< / ><>1140.00< / ><>5.00< / ><>1235.00< / ><>667.50< / ><>2.75< / ><>1207.54< / ><>-6.05< / ><>< / >< / ><><>国际房地产< / ><>139.00< / ><>-0.60< / ><>145.80< / ><>115.60< / ><>6.32< / ><>150.85< / ><>-6.77< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Inv Asia Dragon信托< / ><>488.50< / ><>-1.50< / ><>519.00< / ><>389.00< / ><>3.85< / ><>513.95< / ><>-6.39< / ><>< / >< / ><><>国际债券公司< / ><>171.00< / ><>-0.50< / ><>178.50< / ><>150.11< / ><>7.16< / ><>168.77< / ><>1.53< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通美国IT< / ><>1216.00< / ><>6.00< / ><>1258.00< / ><>1041.00< / ><>0.95< / ><>1244.94< / ><>-2.76< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通亚洲G&I< / ><>584.00< / ><>-< / ><>652.00< / ><>398.00< / ><>5.33< / ><>598.40< / ><>-1.65< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通中国G&I< / ><>273.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>313.00< / ><>259.50< / ><>4.97< / ><>333.42< / ><>-10.19< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通Cleve< / ><>978.00< / ><>-6.00< / ><>986.00< / ><>791.74< / ><>3.73< / ><>997.69< / ><>-1.69< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通核心< / ><>84.20< / ><>-< / ><>86.60< / ><>58.00< / ><>-< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通新兴EMEA< / ><>239.50< / ><>-< / ><>310.00< / ><>181.65< / ><>0.25< / ><>71.39< / ><>245.65< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通新兴< / ><>167.20< / ><>0.60< / ><>181.20< / ><>118.40< / ><>4.50< / ><>181.58< / ><>-7.86< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通欧洲折价< / ><>637.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>666.00< / ><>548.00< / ><>2.51< / ><>694.01< / ><>-7.84< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通欧洲G&I< / ><>147.00< / ><>-1.40< / ><>153.00< / ><>124.50< / ><>3.70< / ><>151.12< / ><>-1.75< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通新兴市场股息< / ><>210.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>221.00< / ><>148.00< / ><>2.86< / ><>228.96< / ><>-8.50< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通新兴市场G&I< / ><>416.00< / ><>-0.50< / ><>641.00< / ><>479.60< / ><>4.03< / ><>472.73< / ><>-1.74< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通印度成长收益< / ><>875.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>1098.00< / ><>799.00< / ><>5.07< / ><>954.03< / ><>-8.29< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通日本< / ><>815.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>867.00< / ><>661.00< / ><>1.07< / ><>879.37< / ><>-7.31< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通英国小型< / ><>355.00< / ><>-1.50< / ><>369.00< / ><>287.92< / ><>4.20< / ><>381.64< / ><>-6.19< / ><>< / >< / ><><>摩根大通美国小型< / ><>439.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>463.00< / ><>365.00< / ><>0.73< / ><>480.76< / ><>-9.50< / ><>< / >< / ><><>劳氏信托< / ><>1248.00< / ><>-8.00< / ><>1298.00< / ><>977.40< / ><>2.96< / ><>1232.14< / ><>1.53< / ><>< / >< / >
< / td> 560.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>798.00< / ><>686.00< / ><>5.00< / ><>787.50< / ><>-18.29< / ><>< / >< / tr> <>Lowland< / ><>187.00< / ><>-0.50< / ><>191.50< / ><>145.50< / ><>3.62< / ><>204.63< / ><>-8.33< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Marwyn Val< / ><>138.50< / ><>-< / ><>137.78< / ><>6.54< / ><>258.24< / ><>-46.36< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Mercantile< / ><>288.50< / ><>-< / ><>290.50< / ><>234.31< / ><>2.86< / ><>319.05< / ><>-9.51< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Merch. Trst< / ><>684.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>691.00< / ><>536.00< / ><>4.34< / ><>721.55< / ><>-4.69< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Mid Wynd< / ><>796.00< / ><>4.00< / ><>804.00< / ><>682.00< / ><>1.05< / ><>810.37< / ><>-2.46< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Metastar Int< / ><>1629.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>1664.00< / ><>1366.00< / ><>0.96< / ><>1712.61< / ><>-5.47< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Montanaro Eur< / ><>179.00< / ><>1.50< / ><>189.00< / ><>142.00< / ><>0.87< / ><>194.12< / ><>-8.22< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Murray Inc< / ><>997.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>1038.00< / ><>854.66< / ><>4.11< / ><>1076.44< / ><>-6.82< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Murray Intl< / ><>374.00< / ><>-1.50< / ><>376.00< / ><>293.00< / ><>3.42< / ><>369.98< / ><>1.21< / ><>< / >< / ><><>New Star IT< / ><>142.00< / ><>1.50< / ><>148.00< / ><>108.00< / ><>2.50< / ><>198.86< / ><>-31.61< / ><>< / >< / ><><>N. Atl Smi IT< / ><>425.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>434.00< / ><>328.00< / ><>1.65< / ><>634.85< / ><>-33.05< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Par. Heinzl< / ><>1124.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>1262.00< / ><>852.00< / ><>0.13< / ><>1245.40< / ><>-10.11< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Peru Assets< / ><>556.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>558.00< / ><>512.00< / ><>1.01< / ><>555.37< / ><>-0.09< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Polar Health< / ><>454.50< / ><>-0.50< / ><>460.50< / ><>340.00< / ><>0.48< / ><>450.44< / ><>1.53< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Polar Fin.< / ><>253.00< / ><>-< / ><>256.00< / ><>199.16< / ><>-< / ><>257.31< / ><>-1.67< / ><>< / >< / table>
IS YOUR SHARE PRICE BEING NOTICED?
The Financial Times Share Service sections help you to reach and engage financially aware decision-makers and affluent shareholders from across the world in print and online.
<><>RiotDi< / ><>42.75< / ><>-0.25< / ><>73.70< / ><>40.10< / ><>13.86< / ><>-1.02< / ><>644.81< / >< / ><><>Relitix< / ><>2668.00< / ><>-57.00< / ><>3575.00< / ><>1991.00< / ><>2.59< / ><>23.69< / ><>3175.59< / >< / ><><>Shinzhove< / ><>513.60< / ><>4.60< / ><>769.60< / ><>391.40< / ><>2.10< / ><>18.29< / ><>3711.76< / >< / ><><>STV Group< / ><>109.50< / ><>0.50< / ><>129.50< / ><>95.60< / ><>-< / ><>10.14< / ><>77.87< / >< / ><><>WPP< / ><>384.30< / ><>3.00< / ><>412.60< / ><>218.50< / ><>3.90< / ><>7.64< / ><>2968.61< / >< / table>
To advertise contact carol.ramsey@ft.com
英国石油公司●< / td><>515.40< / ><>-7.30< / ><>609.40< / ><>399.35< / ><>4.80< / ><>—< / ><>31099.68< / >< / tr> <><>摩羯座< / ><>343.00< / ><>—< / ><>384.00< / ><>181.80< / ><>—< / ><>16.64< / ><>42.16< / >< / > <><>埃克森美孚控股公司●< / ><>11601.00< / ><>—< / ><>11646.60< / ><>11496.00< / ><>2.61< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>GeoPark●< / ><>715.63< / ><>—< / ><>715.63< / ><>703.85< / ><>0.95< / ><>11.85< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>希腊能源< / ><>1298.98< / ><>—< / ><>1310.13< / ><>1285.26< / ><>3.96< / ><>5.21< / ><>286.91< / >< / > <><>帝国石油加元< / ><>9628.71< / ><>-28.02< / ><>10397.16< / ><>6229.98< / ><>1.92< / ><>—< / ><>238.63< / >< / > <><>TC能源公司< / ><>4577.06< / ><>—< / ><>4658.86< / ><>4557.41< / ><>4.07< / ><>-24.87< / ><>427.71< / >< / > < / table>
<><>阿斯利康●< / ><>12114.00< / ><>-120.00< / ><>15732.00< / ><>9892.00< / ><>1.97< / ><>24.93< / ><>3580.59< / >< / > <><>化工集团< / ><>3127.84< / ><>—< / ><>3127.84< / ><>4.92< / ><>15.94< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>葛兰素史克●< / ><>1852.00< / ><>-47.50< / ><>2282.00< / ><>1440.29< / ><>3.78< / ><>13.13< / ><>3594.88< / >< / > <><>海格马制药●< / ><>1628.00< / ><>-12.00< / ><>1865.00< / ><>1187.00< / ><>3.89< / ><>12.15< / ><>445.43< / >< / > < / table>
<>< colspan="8">房地产投资信托公司< / >< / > <><>英国地产< / ><>427.60< / ><>-4.00< / ><>451.60< / ><>318.60< / ><>5.41< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>德文特伦敦< / ><>2050.00< / ><>-14.00< / ><>2196.00< / ><>1469.33< / ><>4.00< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>大波特兰地产< / ><>340.60< / ><>-6.60< / ><>377.00< / ><>270.00< / ><>2.41< / ><>—< / ><>0.00< / >< / > <><>兰德证券< / ><>686.50< / ><>-10.00< / ><>726.00< / ><>522.50< / ><>6.00< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>伦敦计量地产< / ><>189.40< / ><>-5.30< / ><>216.20< / ><>175.30< / ><>6.63< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>初级健康地产< / ><>96.00< / ><>-0.85< / ><>109.60< / ><>87.40< / ><>7.60< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>Segro< / ><>964.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>997.40< / ><>603.00< / ><>3.27< / ><>—< / >< / > <><>沙夫茨伯里资本+< / ><>147.90< / ><>-3.40< / ><>155.10< / ><>124.10< / ><>2.91< / ><>7.91< / ><>2374.68< / >< / > <><>Tritax大型仓储< / ><>159.00< / ><>-1.30< / ><>175.00< / ><>132.20< / ><>5.19< / ><>—< / >< / >
<><>格雷格< / ><>173.10< / ><>-2.20< / ><>202.79< / ><>149.44< / ><>4.85< / ><>6.32< / ><>3067.48< / >< / > <><>哈沃斯集团< / ><>180.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>185.00< / ><>116.80< / ><>0.99< / ><>62.07< / ><>91.61< / >< / > <><>赫利卡< / ><>200.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>236.25< / ><>180.60< / ><>1.31< / ><>41.41< / ><>69.84< / >< / > <><>蒙特维尤地产< / ><>8750.00< / ><>150.00< / ><>10200.00< / ><>8350.00< / ><>6.00< / ><>16.76< / ><>0.01< / >< / > <><>仲量联行●< / ><>1050.00< / ><>-8.00< / ><>1142.00< / ><>791.46< / ><>2.24< / ><>20.19< / ><>246.97< / >< / > <><>天狼星地产< / ><>96.65< / ><>-0.90< / ><>113.00< / ><>86.80< / ><>5.68< / ><>7.44< / ><>7530.54< / >< / > <><>Smart(日)< / ><>115.00< / ><>—< / ><>140.00< / ><>106.00< / ><>2.83< / ><>8.80< / ><>5.00< / >< / >
最高 / 最低 | 零售商 | | | | | | | | Caffyns / 500.00 / — / 550.00 / 350.00 / 2.00 / -12.29 / 0.00 Dunelm Group / 874.00 / -17.50 / 1246.00 / 707.00 / 8.01 / 11.32 / 385.53 Halfords Group● / 267.00 / 26.00 / 274.50 / 123.80 / 3.37 / 17.57 / 4105.34 Inchosp● / 837.50 / -0.50 / 895.00 / 640.50 / 4.01 / 11.55 / 480.94 JD Sports / 86.44 / -1.42 / 106.18 / 63.98 / 1.39 / 10.02 / 10086.13 Kingfisher / 318.30 / -4.50 / 372.30 / 240.30 / 3.90 / 22.74 / 2960.13 Marks & Spencer / 391.40 / -2.80 / 418.33 / 301.10 / 1.07 / 30.82 / 21894.82 Saga / 687.00 / -1.00 / 747.00 / 192.80 / — / 134.12 Sainsbury J / 332.10 / -1.50 / 380.30 / 292.27 / 4.13 / 19.20 / 4518.56 Tesco / 455.00 / -5.40 / 510.40 / 411.70 / 3.19 / 16.55 / 13142.69 Jewson / 804.50 / -15.50 / 981.00 / 713.00 / 2.73 / 18.35 / 1260.82 Hartford / 5945.00 / — / 6960.00 / 5019.00 / 2.82 / 26.80 / 622.17 Johnson Service / 147.50 / 1.30 / 172.10 / 123.80 / 3.25 / 15.86 / 382.90 MITIE Group¶ / 208.00 / — / 214.00 / 134.80 / 2.15 / 31.67 / 5862.31 RS Group / 751.50 / -2.50 / 760.50 / 536.90 / 3.05 / 21.72 / 823.45 Vp / 494.00 / 4.00 / 620.00 / 420.00 / 8.00 / -35.80 / 10.22
科技-软件与服务
最高 / 最低 Computacenter / 5625.00 / 410.00 / 5625.00 / 2234.00 / 1.33 / 38.40 / 587.85 NCC Group / 144.20 / 2.60 / 161.60 / 107.20 / 3.22 / 25.75 / 715.69 The Sage Grp / 1103.50 / 40.50 / 1181.00 / 771.66 / 2.03 / 29.24 / 2100.62 Triad Group● / 410.00 / — / 430.00 / 236.00 / 2.20 / 41.33 / 2.52
媒体
Mission Group / 21.00 / — / 27.00 / 12.00 / — / -0.99 / 0.16
矿业
Central Asia Metals / 174.40 / -7.40 / 244.00 / 125.27 / 8.89 / -5.57 / 3773.87 Crixm Therapeutics / 11.50 / — / 18.50 / 8.00 / — / -2.25 / 123.22
石油与天然气
BorStlnPet / 12.40 / 0.80 / 14.00 / 7.60 / — / -105.26 / 2446.66
Biotech< / td>< / tr> Sareum Holdings< / ><>35.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>40.00< / ><>9.50< / ><>-< / ><>-14.58< / ><>720.88< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">零售商< / >< / ><><>Boohoo Group< / ><>21.65< / ><>0.75< / ><>29.50< / ><>10.30< / ><>-< / ><>-2.80< / ><>4853.34< / >< / ><><>CVS Group< / ><>1298.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>1648.00< / ><>1062.00< / ><>0.65< / ><>17.61< / ><>62.59< / >< / table>
<>< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< ="2">涨跌< / >< colspan="3">52周< / >< ="2">收益率< / >< ="2">净值< / >< / ><><>最高 / 最低< / ><>年初至今< / ><>%< / >< / ><><>Polar Tech.< / ><>653.50< / ><>10.50< / ><>743.50< / ><>385.82< / ><>...< / ><>700.54< / ><>-8.05< / >< / ><><>Right & Ins IT< / ><>2460.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>2520.00< / ><>1955.13< / ><>1.84< / ><>2908.19< / ><>-16.71< / >< / ><><>RIT Cap.< / ><>2565.00< / ><>...< / ><>2645.00< / ><>1932.00< / ><>1.75< / ><>3106.00< / ><>-17.10< / >< / ><><>Ruffer Inv Jr.< / ><>298.50< / ><>1.00< / ><>318.00< / ><>281.26< / ><>2.08< / ><>312.76< / ><>-3.78< / >< / ><><>Schid Asia Plc< / ><>644.00< / ><>8.00< / ><>892.00< / ><>608.00< / ><>1.54< / ><>927.83< / ><>-10.19< / >< / ><><>Schid Asia / Total< / ><>750.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>738.00< / ><>548.70< / ><>1.63< / ><>732.18< / ><>-32.14< / >< / ><><>Schroder Inc< / ><>378.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>378.00< / ><>311.90< / ><>3.91< / ><>398.75< / ><>-5.33< / >< / ><><>Schdr. Japan< / ><>386.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>401.00< / ><>276.00< / ><>3.14< / ><>415.23< / ><>-7.27< / >< / ><><>Schdr Orient.< / ><>458.00< / ><>0.50< / ><>463.00< / ><>303.00< / ><>2.88< / ><>468.19< / ><>-3.41< / >< / ><><>Schdr UK Mid< / ><>784.00< / ><>14.00< / ><>790.00< / ><>652.00< / ><>2.86< / ><>824.80< / ><>-5.88< / >< / ><><>Schwab American< / ><>565.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>572.00< / ><>439.10< / ><>2.91< / ><>642.00< / ><>-6.00< / >< / ><><>Scot Mortgage< / ><>1478.50< / ><>11.50< / ><>1563.00< / ><>1015.74< / ><>0.31< / ><>1602.69< / ><>-8.12< / >< / ><><>Scot Oriental< / ><>275.50< / ><>-2.50< / ><>305.00< / ><>240.00< / ><>1.23< / ><>302.62< / ><>-9.24< / >< / ><><>Strategic Eq.< / ><>355.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>415.00< / ><>330.00< / ><>1.20< / ><>390.94< / ><>-8.35< / >< / ><><>Sprintable Bar< / ><>411.50< / ><>-11.50< / ><>429.50< / ><>344.00< / ><>3.72< / ><>418.29< / ><>1.18< / >< / ><><>Tetragon< / ><>1917.60< / ><>11.50< / ><>1446.64< / ><>892.96< / ><>3.47< / ><>< / >< / ><><>TRIG< / ><>76.40< / ><>-0.20< / ><>80.50< / ><>63.20< / ><>9.88< / ><>100.48< / ><>-23.74< / >< / ><><>UIL< / ><>197.00< / ><>...< / ><>204.00< / ><>188.00< / ><>4.06< / ><>273.57< / ><>-22.25< / >< / ><><>Ultimo EmeMits< / ><>279.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>302.00< / ><>243.00< / ><>3.47< / ><>309.57< / ><>-10.48< / >< / ><><>Unilever< / ><>738.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>885.00< / ><>630.00< / ><>...< / ><>127.12< / ><>-1.22< / >< / ><><>Worldwide Hlth< / ><>393.00< / ><>-1.50< / ><>401.50< / ><>320.00< / ><>6.01< / ><>423.76< / ><>-7.12< / >< / table>
| 电信业 | -------- / ------ / ------- / ------ / ------- / -------- Airtel Africa / 340.00 / 0.40 / 436.20 / 212.08 / 1.54 / 24.83 / 2502.77 BT Group / 206.20 / 1.20 / 242.09 / 173.00 / 4.03 / 18.75 / 9336.07 Telecom Plus / 863.00 / 3.00 / 1914.00 / 638.00 / 5.79 / 8.53 / 317.65 Vodafone / 117.10 / -0.80 / 131.10 / 83.40 / 3.39 / -82.77 / 47994.52 | 烟草业 | AEW UK REIT / 105.00 / -1.40 / 113.20 / 95.90 / 7.62 / 105.95 / -0.64 TR Prop / 306.50 / -0.50 / 364.50 / 291.00 / 5.25 / 341.51 / -9.32 | VCTs | Bmd 2nd VT / 44.40 / -0.20 / 54.00 / 39.50 / 9.01 / 46.70 / -4.50 Nthn 2 VCT / 53.00 / 8 / 56.50 / 47.00 / 5.66 / 55.40 / -4.33 Nthn 3 VCT / 82.00 / — / 86.50 / 79.50 / 5.49 / 86.00 / -4.65 Nthn Venture / 56.00 / — / 59.50 / 53.00 / 5.54 / 58.60 / -4.44 | 零股息优先股 | Brit Amer Tobacco / 4152.00 / -86.00 / 5326.00 / 3677.00 / 5.90 / 11.83 / 2382.94 Imperial Brands+ / 2523.00 / -36.00 / 3632.04 / 2476.00 / 6.61 / 10.05 / 1599.74 | 旅游与休闲业 | easyJet / 674.60 / 1.40 / 683.80 / 332.60 / 1.96 / 10.25 / 2017.11 FirstGroup / 178.00 / -1.60 / 227.80 / 152.10 / 4.04 / 8.32 / 1409.55 Fullers 'A' / 754.00 / — / 776.00 / 550.00 / 2.81 / 19.22 / 8.09 IntConti Hotels+ / 11993.40 / -75.63 / 13305.06 / 8618.00 / 1.17 / 33.18 / 520.39 Intl Cons Air / 436.90 / -5.30 / 492.90 / 332.70 / 1.56 / 7.15 / 4397.60 Whitbread / 2472.00 / -21.00 / 3302.00 / 2098.00 / 3.92 / 20.05 / 405.12 | 私募股权(合并) | CT PrivEq / 485.00 / 5.00 / 592.00 / 439.84 / 5.82 / 697.28 / -30.43 HGCapital / 431.00 / 6.00 / 512.00 / 318.64 / 1.16 / 530.08 / -19.82 HVPE / 3415.00 / 65.00 / 3500.00 / 2745.00 / 8 / 4390.00 / -25.70 ICG Ent / 1486.00 / 6.00 / 1611.42 / 1288.31 / 2.83 / 2027.45 / -27.69 Pantheon Int / 393.00 / 3 / 409.00 / 325.00 / — / 521.30 / -24.96 Partners PE € / 658.49 / 20.88 / 945.52 / 583.57 / 9.11 / 11.57 / -36.04 | | Aberforth GV / 117.50 / — / 120.18 / 109.50 / — / 115.71 / 1.57 | AIM投资公司 | Crys Amber / 82.50 / — / 155.39 / 80.66 / — / 175.59 / -52.73
National Grid■ / 1160.00 / -22.50 / 1428.50 / 1000.00 / 4.18 / 17.71 / 8656.90 Pennon● / 474.40 / -0.60 / 606.00 / 439.40 / 6.17 / 24.45 / 1217.73 Severn Trent / 3100.00 / -50.00 / 3335.00 / 2381.00 / 4.07 / 25.10 / 369.66 SSE● / 2381.00 / -35.00 / 2767.50 / 1597.00 / 2.89 / 22.57 / 1491.74
最高 / 最低 | 支持服务 | | | | | | | | Christie / 152.50 / - / 165.00 / 90.00 / 2.30 / 30.02 / 16.87 LonSec / 3650.00 / - / 3800.00 / 2100.00 / 2.66 / 18.81 / 0.15 NWF / 153.00 / -0.50 / 187.50 / 110.00 / 5.69 / 8.23 / 112.77 Petards / 10.00 / - / 12.50 / 7.00 / 14.93 / 9.80 Renew / 962.00 / 1.00 / 979.00 / 772.00 / 2.11 / 15.60 / 82.80
| Tech - Software & Services | | | | | | | | Oxford Metrics / 40.40 / 1.00 / 60.40 / 37.50 / 8.04 / 73.45 / 315.93
| 旅游休闲 | | | | | | | | Gaming Realms / 30.00 / -0.10 / 52.00 / 29.00 / 14.78 / 413.30 Jet2 / 1528.00 / -25.00 / 1676.00 / 980.00 / 1.11 / 7.23 / 286.83
所有数据均截至前一交易日收盘。公司分类基于FTSE使用的ICB系统。富时100指数成分股以粗体显示。除非另有说明,收盘价以便士计价。最高价与最低价基于52周滚动交易日的盘中交易。市盈率(P / E)基于最新年度报告与账目,并随中期业绩更新。市盈率采用公司摊薄每股收益计算。收盘价基于收盘价及上一财年已支付股息,并随中期业绩更新。收益率以净值显示;英国公司股息扣除10%税项,非英国公司为税前。最高价、最低价、收益率及市盈率在适当情况下已调整反映资本变动。交易量为日终汇总总额,四舍五入至最接近的1,000股。每股净资产值(NAV)基于收盘价及30天收盘价。收盘价基于最新累计公平净资产值估算及收盘价。折价、溢价、毛赎回收益率(GRY)及股份清算障碍率(HR)以百分比显示,NAV以便士计价。
- 除息交易 - 除资本分配交易
所列价格仅供参考,发布时信息被认为准确。ICE或《金融时报》不提供任何要约。本报不保证信息的可靠性或完整性,亦不对因依赖或使用本信息而产生的任何损失承担责任。
《金融时报》股票服务为付费印刷列表服务,可能无法充分代表伦敦证券交易所上市的所有公司。本服务面向所有上市公司,但需视编辑部裁量。新销售咨询请发送至data@ft.com。如需进一步信息,请联系newspapers@ice.com
数据提供方
CP Capital Asset Management Limited Artemis Fund Managers Ltd (1200)F 57 St James's Street, London SW1A 1LD 0800 092 2051
Algebra Core Italy I EUR / € 252.17 / - / 0.91 / 0.00 / 25.36 / 17.46 Algebra Core Italy R EUR / € 232.80 / - / 0.83 / 0.00 / 24.43 / 16.58 Financial Credit I / € 229.87 / - / -0.03 / 0.00 / 5.87 / 8.44 Financial Credit I GBP / £ 203.63 / - / -0.03 / 0.00 I USD / $ 212.39 / - / -0.02 / 5.86 / 0.00 II / € 193.29 / - / -0.02 / 0.00 / 5.18 / 7.79 Equity B / € 400.89 / - / 3.06 / 0.00 Equity RI / € 324.86 / - / 2.47 / 0.00 / 27.05 / 27.76 Equity Fund B GBP / £ 335.03 / - / 2.54 / 0.00 Equity Fund RI USD / $ 505.22 / - / 3.88 / 3.90 / 0.00 Income I / € 309.33 / - / 0.95 / 0.00 / 15.65 / 16.99 Income RI / € 272.21 / - / 0.83 / 0.00 / 14.61 / 15.94 Income Fund I GBP / £ 227.22 / - / 0.69 / 6.02 / 0.00 Income Fund I USD / $ 259.57 / - / 0.80 / 0.00 Global Opportunities I / € 155.34 / - / 0.03 / 0.00 / 3.40 / 5.65 Global Opportunities RI / € 148.99 / - / 0.03 / 0.00 / 2.83 / 5.13 Global Opportunities I GBP / € 154.54 / - / 0.03 / 0.00 Global Opportunities I USD / $ 159.52 / - / 0.03 / 0.00 IG I / € 120.56 / - / -0.09 / 0.00 / 4.12 / 6.59 IG RI / € 116.51 / - / -0.09 / 0.00 / 3.61 / 6.06 Strategic Fund RI / € 116.19 / - / -0.05 / 0.00 / 2.73 / 0.00 Global Equity Select B / € 154.29 / - / 0.92 / 0.00 / 9.59 / 11.16 Global Equity Select R / € 146.78 / - / 0.87 / 0.00 / 8.19 / 9.73
Ameris Capital Inc< / td>< / tr> <><>Artemis企业债I累< / ><>118.89< / ><>-< / ><>-0.23< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.35< / >< / > <><>Artemis全球收益I分< / ><>245.08< / ><>-< / ><>1.61< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.17< / >< / > <><>Artemis高收益I Q收< / ><>75.64< / ><>-< / ><>-0.12< / ><>0.23< / ><>2.52< / >< / > <><>Artemis收益I收< / ><>359.05< / ><>-< / ><>-1.20< / ><>5.48< / ><>12.25< / >< / > <><>Artemis月度分红I收< / ><>103.06< / ><>-< / ><>0.30< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.27< / >< / > <><>Artemis短期债策略债< / ><>134.05< / ><>-< / ><>-0.11< / ><>0.00< / ><>6.45< / >< / > <><>Artemis SmartGARP欧洲股I累< / ><>1026.00< / ><>-< / ><>-3.30< / ><>0.00< / ><>28.52< / >< / > <><>Artemis SmartGARP全球小型股I累< / ><>257.87< / ><>-< / ><>0.97< / ><>1.95< / ><>14.91< / >< / > <><>Artemis SmartGARP全球股I累< / ><>349.57< / ><>-< / ><>1.88< / ><>0.00< / ><>29.89< / >< / > <><>Artemis SmartGARP全球股I累< / ><>808.28< / ><>-< / ><>7.15< / ><>0.00< / ><>29.35< / >< / > <><>Artemis SmartGARP英国股I累< / ><>4629.19< / ><>-< / ><>-4.97< / ><>2.41< / ><>27.78< / >< / > <><>Artemis战略资产I累< / ><>108.94< / ><>-< / ><>0.84< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.99< / >< / > <><>Artemis战略债I Q累< / ><>126.37< / ><>-< / ><>-0.17< / ><>4.46< / ><>6.83< / >< / > <><>Artemis英国精选基金I累< / ><>1510.20< / ><>-< / ><>-5.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.71< / >< / > <><>Artemis英国小型股I累< / ><>2659.84< / ><>-< / ><>5.15< / ><>1.81< / ><>5.19< / >< / > <><>Artemis英国特殊机会I累< / ><>1263.59< / ><>-< / ><>-5.33< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.57< / >< / > <><>Artemis美国扩展阿尔法I累< / ><>587.60< / ><>-< / ><>7.50< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.33< / >< / > <><>Artemis美国精选I累< / ><>582.77< / ><>-< / ><>7.28< / ><>0.00< / ><>19.25< / >< / > <><>Artemis美国小型股I累< / ><>533.57< / ><>-< / ><>8.24< / ><>0.00< / ><>16.57< / >< / > < / table>
Gate Village 5,Level 4,Unit 11,迪拜国际金融中心,阿拉伯联合酋长国 www.asbc.com< / td>< / tr><><>ASB SUKUK - 累积< / ><>$ 104.15< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB SUKUK - 分红< / ><>$ 97.58< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.50< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB State Street环球股票< / ><>$ 125.21< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB环球科技< / ><>$ 157.94< / ><>-< / ><>0.46< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB中东北非股票< / ><>$ 100.08< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>
<><>美国动态< / ><>$ 9475.08< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>美国一号< / ><>$ 11210.70< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.75< / ><>11.36< / >< / ><><>债券环球< / ><>€ 1638.26< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.33< / ><>6.28< / >< / ><><>欧增长< / ><>€ 1349.76< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>远东< / ><>$ 1278.40< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">蓝鲸投资基金 ICAV www.bluewhale.co.uk info@bluewhale.co.uk< / >< / ><>< colspan="7">英国金融行为监管局(FCA)认可-爱尔兰UCITS< / >< / ><><>蓝鲸增长美元T< / ><>$< / ><>24.59< / ><>-< / ><>0.23< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">英国金融行为监管局(FCA)认可< / >< / ><><>环球领袖基金美元C< / ><>$ 33.42< / ><>-< / ><>-0.15< / ><>0.00< / ><>8.54< / ><>11.20< / >< / ><><>环球领袖可持续发展基金美元C< / ><>$ 19.55< / ><>-< / ><>-0.12< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.43< / ><>10.10< / >< / ><><>环球可持续总回报债券英镑B< / ><>£ 9.48< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>环球可持续总回报债券美元B< / ><>$ 10.92< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>美国股票增长基金美元B< / ><>$ 77.73< / ><>-< / ><>0.24< / ><>0.00< / ><>8.05< / ><>10.62< / >< / ><><>美国灵活股票基金美元B< / ><>$ 42.87< / ><>-< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.45< / ><>15.39< / >< / ><><>美国中盘增长基金美元C< / ><>$ 25.46< / ><>-< / ><>0.12< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.49< / ><>9.70< / >< / ><><>美国小盘混合基金美元B< / ><>$ 31.95< / ><>-< / ><>0.16< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.90< / ><>11.10< / >< / ><><>美国小型公司基金美元B< / ><>$ 47.96< / ><>-< / ><>0.34< / ><>0.00< / ><>8.95< / ><>7.74< / >< / ><><>美国可持续增长基金美元C< / ><>$ 40.87< / ><>-< / ><>-0.05< / ><>0.00< / ><>8.04< / ><>12.03< / >< / ><><>美国可持续价值基金美元C累积< / ><>$ 18.38< / ><>-< / ><>0.04< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>
凯易商财富国际多策略基金有限公司< / td>< / tr><><>均衡策略< / ><>£< / ><>1.18< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.90< / ><>11.38< / >< / ><><>均衡策略A类< / ><>£< / ><>1.18< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.84< / ><>8.66< / ><>8.81< / >< / ><><>谨慎均衡策略< / ><>£< / ><>1.48< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.91< / ><>9.45< / ><>9.29< / >< / ><><>谨慎均衡策略A类< / ><>£< / ><>1.06< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.84< / ><>6.97< / ><>7.37< / >< / ><><>成长策略< / ><>£< / ><>2.67< / ><>-< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.76< / ><>1.16< / ><>5.50< / >< / ><><>成长策略A类< / ><>£< / ><>1.28< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.54< / ><>10.46< / ><>11.01< / >< / ><><>高成长策略< / ><>£< / ><>3.93< / ><>-< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.24< / ><>14.76< / ><>14.89< / >< / ><><>高成长策略A类< / ><>£< / ><>1.34< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.52< / ><>12.36< / ><>12.28< / >< / ><><>高收益债券基金B类(月度)< / ><>£< / ><>0.99< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>高收益债券基金B类(季度)< / ><>£< / ><>1.00< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>USS成长策略< / ><>$< / ><>2.60< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.21< / ><>15.87< / ><>15.72< / >< / table>
日常交易。A类无初始费用,其他类别最高2%。
卡迪安投资集团< / td><>(卢森堡)< / >< / tr> <>< colspan="7">英国金融行为监管局认可< / >< / > <><>卡迪安另类股票市场中性-C类股票< / ><>€< / ><>227.07< / ><>-< / ><>-0.44< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.91< / >< / > <><>卡迪安欧元垃圾债券-C类< / ><>€< / ><>1454.34< / ><>-< / ><>-0.24< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.22< / >< / > <><>卡迪安全球高收益债券-C类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>291.25< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.85< / >< / > <><>卡迪安全球通胀挂钩债券-Don-I类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>166.87< / ><>-< / ><>-0.11< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.67< / >< / > <><>卡迪安收益总回报-C类< / ><>€< / ><>144.07< / ><>-< / ><>-0.21< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.18< / >< / > <><>卡迪安分散化期货-I类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>13717.49< / ><>-< / ><>10.72< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.39< / >< / > <><>卡迪安澳大利亚股票, Australia CA AS< / ><>A$< / ><>2464.72< / ><>-< / ><>-23.22< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.34< / >< / > <><>卡迪安新兴市场股票-L类< / ><>€< / ><>1536.52< / ><>-< / ><>5.47< / ><>0.00< / ><>25.84< / >< / > <><>卡迪安生物技术股票-L类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>1484.45< / ><>-< / ><>-5.53< / ><>0.00< / ><>20.58< / >< / > <><>卡迪安欧洲创新股票-L类-R Cap< / ><>€< / ><>262.85< / ><>-< / ><>-0.71< / ><>0.00< / ><>-4.65< / >< / > <><>卡迪安指数阿尔法字符串-C类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>1532.81< / ><>-< / ><>0.02< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.49< / >< / > <><>卡迪安多空信用-R类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>120.54< / ><>-< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.05< / >< / > <><>卡迪安风险阿尔法字符串-C类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>2758.46< / ><>-< / ><>-0.62< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.15< / >< / > <><>卡迪安可持续债券新兴市场I分红类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>778.31< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.37< / >< / > <><>卡迪安可持续债券欧元公司R类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>111.79< / ><>-< / ><>-0.06< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.86< / >< / > <><>卡迪安可持续全球高收益债券-I类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>1267.70< / ><>-< / ><>0.27< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.36< / >< / > <><>卡迪安性别平等经济股票-R类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>164.73< / ><>-< / ><>0.60< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.51< / >< / > <><>卡迪安气候行动股票-I类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>2168.14< / ><>-< / ><>11.37< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.60< / >< / > <><>卡迪安可持续新兴市场股票-C类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>188.30< / ><>-< / ><>0.84< / ><>0.00< / ><>23.81< / >< / > <><>卡迪安可持续欧元货币联盟股票-C类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>224.35< / ><>-< / ><>0.39< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.64< / >< / > <><>卡迪安可持续公司SBM股票-I类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>2505.49< / ><>-< / ><>0.82< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.65< / >< / > <><>卡迪安可持续全球核心股票-I类-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>46.49< / ><>-< / ><>0.05< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.57< / >< / > <><>纽时环球基金美国高收益公司债-R类-GF< / ><>€< / ><>174.86< / ><>-< / ><>0.02< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.78< / >< / > < / table>
<>< colspan="7">其他国际基金< / >< / > <><>卡迪安欧元短期债券-C类Bds< / ><>€ 2194.12< / ><>-< / ><>-0.34< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.32< / ><>2.99< / >< / > <><>卡迪安债券信用机会Bonds< / ><>€ 222.09< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.78< / ><>3.42< / >< / > <><>卡迪安新兴市场债券-C类-Cap< / ><>$ 3121.29< / ><>-< / ><>-0.93< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.15< / ><>9.23< / >< / > <><>卡迪安欧洲优选股票-L类Dlt 3-Cap< / ><>€ 259.85< / ><>-< / ><>-0.19< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.51< / ><>5.53< / >< / > <><>卡迪安全球人口结构股票-L类-R Cap< / ><>€ 388.77< / ><>-< / ><>0.55< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.71< / ><>12.53< / >< / > <><>卡迪安肿瘤学重要性股票-I类-Cap< / ><>$ 3762.28< / ><>-< / ><>-35.17< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.62< / ><>9.69< / >< / > <><>卡迪安
Robt&InnTech I Cap / $ 7721.14 / - / 6.77 / 0.00 / 28.48 / 24.52
Absolute Return M Inc / £ / 144.63 / - / 0.07 / 2.61 / 3.13 / 2.55 Capital Gearing Portfolio GBP P / £ / 39574.91 / - / 26.77 / 1.95 / 3.03 / 2.39 Capital Gearing Portfolio GBP V / £ / 192.51 / - / 0.13 / 1.94 / 3.04 / 2.40 Dollar Fund Cis D Inc / £ / 152.08 / - / 0.35 / 2.82 / -1.43 / -2.51 Dollar Hedged GBP Inc / £ / 94.65 / - / -0.09 / 2.54 / 0.98 / 0.04 Real Return Cis A Inc / £ / 183.05 / - / 0.33 / 2.55 / -0.73 / -2.28 UK Index-Linked Bond G Inc / £ / 105.03 / - / 0.00 / 2.10 / 0.77 / 0.00
VT Cantab Balanced A GBP Acc / 141.20 / - / 0.34 / 1.80 / 10.11 / 9.43 VT Cantab Moderate A GBP Acc / 139.43 / - / 0.25 / 2.12 / 9.56 / 8.37 VT Cantab Moderate A GBP Acc / 173.27 / - / -0.28 / 1.37 / 10.22 / 10.05
| Other International Funds | | | | | | | CAM-GTF VCC / $ 459918.30 / 459818.30 / 0.00 / 0.49 / 3.79 CAM Gri VCC / $ 1440.68 / - / 0.00 / 20.88 / 4.69 RAIC VCC / $ 1.89 / - / 0.00 / 8.97 / -1.66
Chartered Asset Management Pte Ltd
www.cpglobal.com.sg, Email: customer_support@cpglobal.com.sg
| International Mutual Funds | | | | | | | CP Multi-Strategy Fund / $ 465.42 / - / 0.23 / 0.00 / 12.21 / 13.48
| International Mutual Funds | | | | | | | CP Dual-Purpose Fund / $ 213.06 / - / -0.06 / 0.00 CP Global Alpha Fund / $ 507.35 / - / -0.15 / 0.00 / 11.38 / 12.78 CPS-Master Private Fund / $ 613.16 / - / -0.02 / 0.00 / 11.17 / 12.62
新兴市场股票基金A类美元累计< / td><>$< / ><>16.39< / ><>-< / ><>0.08< / ><>0.00< / ><>28.07< / ><>25.21< / >< / tr><><>新兴市场股票基金A类英镑累计< / ><>£< / ><>17.05< / ><>-< / ><>0.15< / ><>0.00< / ><>24.39< / ><>21.75< / >< / ><><>新兴市场股票基金D类英镑分红< / ><>£< / ><>15.43< / ><>-< / ><>0.14< / ><>1.69< / ><>21.87< / ><>19.25< / >< / ><><>新兴市场股票基金A类欧元累计< / ><>€< / ><>17.09< / ><>-< / ><>0.12< / ><>1.51< / ><>23.94< / ><>22.09< / >< / table>
<><>欧元累计类< / ><>€< / ><>18.21< / ><>-< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.04< / ><>3.93< / >< / ><><>欧元累计类(H)< / ><>€< / ><>12.25< / ><>-< / ><>-0.02< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.42< / ><>4.60< / >< / ><><>欧元分红类< / ><>€< / ><>11.23< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>-1.59< / ><>-0.73< / >< / ><><>欧元分红类(H)< / ><>€< / ><>7.50< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>5.05< / ><>-0.30< / ><>-0.08< / >< / ><><>英镑分红类< / ><>£< / ><>11.80< / ><>-< / ><>0.03< / ><>4.75< / ><>-1.26< / ><>-1.07< / >< / ><><>英镑分红类(H)< / ><>£< / ><>8.49< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>4.70< / ><>1.56< / ><>1.46< / >< / ><><>美元累计类< / ><>$< / ><>15.31< / ><>-< / ><>-0.03< / ><>0.00< / ><>6.45< / ><>6.61< / >< / ><><>瑞郎分红类(H)< / ><>Str< / ><>7.65< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>-2.68< / ><>-2.59< / >< / table>
<>< colspan="8">道奇·考克斯环球基金-全球股票基金< / >< / ><><>美元累计股份类别< / ><>$< / ><>50.43< / ><>-< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>16.54< / ><>18.09< / >< / ><><>英镑累计股份类别< / ><>£< / ><>61.02< / ><>-< / ><>0.27< / ><>0.00< / ><>13.18< / ><>14.80< / >< / ><><>英镑分红股份类别< / ><>£< / ><>39.20< / ><>-< / ><>0.18< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.61< / ><>13.26< / >< / ><><>欧元累计股份类别< / ><>€< / ><>64.99< / ><>-< / ><>0.14< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.74< / ><>12.86< / >< / ><><>英镑分红股份类别(H)< / ><>£< / ><>21.71< / ><>-< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.45< / ><>15.71< / >< / ><><>美元分红类别< / ><>$< / ><>20.62< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.93< / ><>16.44< / >< / ><><>加元累计类别< / ><>C$< / ><>66.04< / ><>-< / ><>0.24< / ><>0.00< / ><>17.28< / ><>18.83< / >< / table>
<><>美元累计股份类别< / ><>$< / ><>61.76< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.36< / ><>16.68< / >< / ><><>英镑累计股份类别< / ><>£< / ><>70.67< / ><>-< / ><>0.30< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.06< / ><>13.43< / >< / ><><>英镑分红股份类别< / ><>£< / ><>41.17< / ><>-< / ><>0.17< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.22< / ><>12.53< / >< / ><><>欧元累计股份类别< / ><>€< / ><>68.72< / ><>-< / ><>0.13< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.74< / ><>11.37< / >< / ><><>英镑分红股份类别(H)< / ><>£< / >
龙资本
<>< colspan="7">龙资本www.dragoncapital.com基金信息:info@dragoncapital.com< / >< / ><>< colspan="7">其他国际基金< / >< / ><><>越南股票(UCITS基金A类美元)< / ><>$< / ><>36.53< / ><>-< / ><>0.15< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.05< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>
桑德兰 SR43 4AU (0800) S58 3010< / td>< / tr> <>< colspan="7">授权投资基金< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 全球影响债券< / ><>87.05< / ><>-< / ><>-0.14< / ><>4.18< / ><>-0.35< / ><>0.60< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 绿色影响股票< / ><>135.80< / ><>-< / ><>0.80< / ><>0.93< / ><>8.93< / ><>9.98< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 绿色影响基础设施< / ><>78.76< / ><>-< / ><>-0.11< / ><>6.64< / ><>-2.53< / ><>-6.23< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 全球可持续政府债券< / ><>97.16< / ><>-< / ><>-0.12< / ><>3.10< / ><>0.00< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续欧洲股票 A< / ><>495.60< / ><>-< / ><>-2.80< / ><>1.84< / ><>13.40< / ><>14.42< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续欧洲股票 B< / ><>500.90< / ><>-< / ><>-2.90< / ><>0.00< / ><>13.36< / ><>14.39< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续全球股票 A< / ><>458.90< / ><>-< / ><>1.00< / ><>0.53< / ><>9.97< / ><>9.79< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续全球股票 B< / ><>463.00< / ><>-< / ><>1.00< / ><>0.95< / ><>9.92< / ><>9.76< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续管理收益 A< / ><>141.10< / ><>-< / ><>-0.90< / ><>4.02< / ><>5.78< / ><>4.91< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续管理收益 B< / ><>153.00< / ><>-< / ><>-1.00< / ><>3.99< / ><>6.27< / ><>5.33< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续短期债券< / ><>95.93< / ><>-< / ><>-0.06< / ><>4.58< / ><>0.46< / ><>1.15< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续英镑债券 A< / ><>85.13< / ><>-< / ><>-0.11< / ><>4.99< / ><>-0.35< / ><>0.77< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续英镑债券 B< / ><>98.26< / ><>-< / ><>-0.13< / ><>4.99< / ><>0.25< / ><>1.38< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续英国股票 A< / ><>254.00< / ><>-< / ><>-0.70< / ><>1.77< / ><>6.09< / ><>4.59< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续英国股票 B< / ><>253.20< / ><>-< / ><>-0.80< / ><>2.14< / ><>4.10< / ><>4.53< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续英国股票机会 A< / ><>329.60< / ><>-< / ><>-1.70< / ><>1.47< / ><>3.43< / ><>6.20< / >< / > <><>EdenTree 可持续英国股票机会 B< / ><>336.40< / ><>-< / ><>-1.80< / ><>1.92< / ><>3.36< / ><>6.15< / >< / > < / table>
买入价 卖出价 涨跌 收益率 24个月 36个月 基金
Fundsmith LLP(1200)F 邮政信箱10846,切姆斯福德埃塞克斯郡CM99 2BW 0330 123 1815 www.fundsmith.co.uk,enquiries@fundsmith.co.uk
获授权投资基金< / td>< / tr><><>Fundsmith股票基金T类-累计< / ><>708.21< / ><>-< / ><>3.81< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.37< / ><>3.10< / >< / ><><>Fundsmith股票基金T类-收益< / ><>639.20< / ><>-< / ><>3.43< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.69< / ><>13.88< / >< / table>
McInroy & Wood投资组合有限公司 伊斯特奥尔德斯通,哈丁顿EH41 3SF 01620 825867
<>< colspan="8">健力士全球投资者< / >< / ><><>健力士全球股票收益Y英镑分红< / ><>£< / ><>24.99< / ><>-< / ><>0.16< / ><>2.05< / ><>9.56< / ><>11.16< / >< / ><><>健力士全球创新者Y英镑累计< / ><>£< / ><>47.28< / ><>-< / ><>0.31< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.01< / ><>15.57< / >< / ><><>健力士全球优质中盘股Y英镑累计< / ><>£< / ><>15.97< / ><>-< / ><>0.16< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.23< / ><>11.52< / >< / table>
<>< colspan="7">国际保险< / >< / ><><>假日房产债券系列1< / ><>£< / ><>0.49< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.41< / >< / ><><>假日房产债券系列2< / ><>£< / ><>0.66< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.40< / >< / table>
Marwyn资产管理有限公司< / td><>(开曼)< / >< / tr><>< colspan="8">受监管< / >< / ><><>Marwyn价值投资者< / ><>£< / ><>362.11< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>
<>< ="7">获授权投资基金< / >< / ><><>均衡基金累计< / ><>7026.60< / ><>-< / ><>9.20< / ><>1.74< / ><>5.04< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>均衡基金收益< / ><>6634.30< / ><>-< / ><>8.60< / ><>1.77< / ><>3.33< / ><>3.14< / >< / ><><>新兴市场基金累计< / ><>2343.70< / ><>-< / ><>4.50< / ><>1.71< / ><>2.71< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>新兴市场基金收益< / ><>2111.80< / ><>-< / ><>4.00< / ><>1.74< / ><>0.95< / ><>-1.53< / >< / ><><>收益基金累计< / ><>3643.70< / ><>-< / ><>-5.30< / ><>2.68< / ><>7.25< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>收益基金收益< / ><>3230.20< / ><>-< / ><>-4.70< / ><>2.76< / ><>4.13< / ><>3.86< / >< / ><><>小型公司基金累计< / ><>7344.70< / ><>-< / ><>27.40< / ><>1.20< / ><>5.13< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>小型公司基金收益< / >
<>6904.80< / ><>-< / ><>25.70< / ><>1.22< / ><>3.87< / ><>4.16< / >< / table>
<>< ="6">英国司法部共同投资基金< / ><>(英国)< / >< / ><>< ="7">英国房地产及其他单位信托< / >< / ><><>股票指数跟踪基金收益< / ><>2694.00< / ><>-< / ><>-2.00< / ><>1.90< / ><>11.80< / ><>11.49< / >< / ><>< ="7">分配单位< / >< / table>
<>< ="7">Nutshell资产管理有限公司< / ><>(爱尔)< / >< / ><>< ="8">Nutshell资产管理有限公司,Ivybridge大厦,1-5 Adam街,伦敦WC2N 6LE www.nutshellam.com< / >< / ><>< ="8">获授权投资基金< / >< / ><><>Nutshell成长基金英镑机构创始人< / ><>£< / ><>186.86< / ><>-< / ><>0.46< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.16< / ><>16.66< / >< / table>
皇家伦敦 伦敦芬丘奇街80号,EC3M 4BY
<>< ="7">获授权法人董事-Waystone管理(英国)有限公司< / >< / ><><>环球总基金PCG A< / ><>709.43< / ><>-< / ><>2.93< / ><>0.41< / ><>15.36< / ><>18.65< / >< / ><><>环球总基金PCG B< / ><>698.53< / ><>-< / ><>2.88< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.29< / ><>18.59< / >< / ><><>环球总基金PCG国际< / ><>681.36< / ><>-< / ><>2.81< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.12< / ><>18.41< / >< / table>
Purisima投资基金(英国)(1200)F 利兹市惠灵顿街中央广场3层,LS1 4DL 订购台与咨询:0345 922 0044 获授权投资基金
<>< ="6">Purisima投资基金(泽西)有限公司< / ><>(泽)< / >< / ><><>受监管< / ><>< / >< / ><><>PCG B< / ><>577.18< / ><>-< / ><>0.26< / ><>0.00< / ><>17.21< / ><>21.10< / >< / ><><>PCG C< / ><>556.92< / ><>-< / ><>0.25< / ><>0.00< / ><>16.95< / ><>20.83< / >< / table>
可获取的其他基金 详情请参阅 www.royallondon.com
Royal London Sustainable Diversified A Inc / 285.70 / - / 0.50 / 1.54 / 4.64 / 6.19 Royal London Sustainable World A Inc / 507.80 / - / 2.30 / 0.76 / 11.02 / 11.89 Corporate Bond Mth Income / 76.96 / - / -0.15 / 4.44 / 0.39 / 1.34 European Growth Trust / 298.20 / - / -0.30 / 1.14 / 11.66 / 11.43 Sustainable Leaders A Inc / 1029.00 / - / -1.00 / 1.47 / 8.79 / 8.12 UK Growth Trust / 880.00 / - / -2.60 / 1.69 / 11.85 / 11.39 UK Income With Growth Trust / 259.40 / - / -0.60 / 3.83 / 8.27 / 8.36 US Growth Trust / 657.10 / - / 4.90 / 0.01 / 14.43 / 17.49
Oasis Crescent Global Eq Fd (USD) A (Dist) / $ / 58.25 / - / -0.24 / 0.00 / 20.99 Oasis Crescent Global Inc Fd (USD) A (Dist) / $ / 10.27 / - / 0.00 / 0.72 Low Equity Fund () D () / $ / 16.59 / - / -0.05 / 0.00 / 11.83 Med Equity Fd () A () / $ / 19.50 / - / -0.08 / 0.00 / 14.22 Prop Equity Fd () A () / $ / 11.18 / - / -0.05 / 0.00 / 11.99 Short Term Inc Fd () A () / $ / 0.96 / - / 0.00 / 0.80 Variable Fund () A () / £ / 12.45 / - / -0.02 / 0.00 / 8.64
| Private Fund Mgrs (Guernsey) Ltd (GSY) | | 监管 | Monument Growth 11 / 08 / 2026 / £ / 612.89 / 638.71 / 0.00 / 1.36 / 3.26 / 3.09
Ruffer LLP (1000) F 3楼,Central Square,Wellington Street,Leeds LS1 4DL 订购台与咨询:0345 601 9610 授权投资基金
WS Ruffer Total Return C Acc / 601.96 / - / 0.00 / 1.78 / 4.40 / 3.53 WS Ruffer Total Return C Inc / 351.79 / - / 0.00 / 1.80 / 3.60 / 1.78
| SICO BSC | 电话:+973 1751 5700 网站:www.sicobank.com / (BHR) Khaleej Equity Fund / $ / 583.47 / - / -3.93 / 0.00 / -3.81 Sico Gulf Equity Fund / $ / 198.62 / - / 0.17 / 0.00 / 10.57
| Capital KSA | 电话:+966 11 521 3835 网站:www.sicocapital.com / (KSA) Kingdom Equity Fund / SAR / 10.66 / - / -0.27 / 0.00 / 1.39 MENA Equity Fund / SAR / 21.34 / - / 0.13 / 0.00 / -1.37 / 4.80 Capital Money Market / SAR / 13.92 / - / -0.03 / 0.00 / 。
Stonehage Fleming Investment Management Ltd< / td><>(IRL)< / >< / tr> <><>www.stonehagefleming.com / gbi enquiries@stonehagefleming.com< / ><>< / >< / > < / table>
<><>SF Global Best Ideas Eq B USD Acc< / ><>$< / ><>308.65< / ><>-< / ><>0.20< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.90< / ><>7.54< / >< / > <><>SF Global Best Ideas Eq D GBP Inc< / ><>£< / ><>344.60< / ><>-< / ><>1.36< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.89< / ><>4.57< / >< / > < / table>
Superfund 趋势黄金< / td><>$ 2002.60< / ><>-< / ><>-17.06< / ><>0.00< / ><>37.30< / ><>31.15< / >< / tr><><> 趋势白银< / ><>$ 2176.40< / ><>-< / ><>-19.77< / ><>0.00< / ><>56.21< / ><>39.39< / >< / ><><> 趋势< / ><>$ 803.79< / ><>-< / ><>0.33< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.38< / ><>5.77< / >< / ><><> 比特币 0-2x< / ><>€ 83.15< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>-2.33< / ><>10.17< / >< / ><><> 基金中基金< / ><>$ 157.85< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>18.23< / ><>17.41< / >< / table>
<><> 区块链< / ><>€< / ><>23.98< / ><>-< / ><>0.34< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.80< / ><>31.71< / >< / ><><> 黄金白银+矿业< / ><>€< / ><>22.42< / ><>-< / ><>0.09< / ><>0.00< / ><>38.01< / ><>-< / >< / ><><> 方阵四季< / ><>€< / ><>15.25< / ><>-< / ><>-0.13< / ><>0.00< / ><>17.35< / ><>16.89< / >< / ><><> 通胀< / ><>SFr< / ><>11.73< / ><>-< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>13.76< / ><>4.56< / >< / table>

<><>Troy 资产管理(1200)< / ><>(英国)< / >< / ><><>中央广场三层,惠灵顿街,利兹 LS1 4DL< / ><>< / >< / ><><>订单台和咨询电话 0345 608 0950< / ><>< / >< / ><><>获授权投资基金< / ><>< / >< / table>
获授权法人董事 — Waystone Management(英国)有限公司
<>< colspan="6">Trojan 投资基金< / >< / ><><>Trojan 伦理全球英镑累计< / ><>114.91< / ><>-< / ><>-0.46< / ><>2.95< / ><>1.08< / >< / ><><> 伦理全球英镑增值< / ><>101.20< / ><>-< / ><>-0.40< / ><>3.01< / ><>-0.82< / >< / ><><> 伦理英镑累计< / ><>159.77< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.67< / ><>6.76< / >< / ><><> 伦理英镑增值< / ><>154.24< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.67< / ><>6.66< / >< / ><><> 伦理收益英镑累计< / ><>172.88< / ><>-< / ><>-0.56< / ><>2.51< / ><>5.83< / >< / ><><> 伦理收益英镑增值< / ><>130.08< / ><>-< / ><>-0.43< / ><>2.60< / ><>3.03< / >< / ><><> 基金英镑累计< / ><>467.46< / ><>-< / ><>-0.72< / ><>0.80< / ><>6.35< / >< / ><><> 基金英镑增值< / ><>366.28< / ><>-< / ><>-0.57< / ><>0.88< / ><>7.54< / >< / ><><> 全球收益英镑累计< / ><>179.02< / ><>-< / ><>-0.40< / ><>3.24< / ><>4.27< / >< / ><><> 全球收益英镑增值< / ><>132.90< / ><>-< / ><>-0.30< / ><>3.31< / ><>1.02< / >< / ><><> 收益英镑累计< / ><>409.45< / ><>-< / ><>-0.93< / ><>2.72< / ><>4.27< / >< / ><><> 收益英镑增值< / ><>180.40< / ><>-< / ><>-0.41< / ><>2.81< / ><>1.73< / >< / table>
<>< colspan="7"> 基金(爱尔兰)plc< / >< / ><><> 欧洲英镑累计< / ><>€< / ><>1.0313< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><> 排除英镑累计< / ><>£< / ><>1.3364< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.80< / >< / ><><> 全球股票英镑累计< / ><>£< / ><>6.1573< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.20< / ><>1.98< / >< / ><><>(爱尔兰)英镑累计< / ><>£< / ><>1.8795< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.05< / >< / table>
本版所列基金价格由基金监管机构、基金管理人及基金管理公司提供。页面上发布的基金详情(包括价格)仅供参考,不构成投资建议。金融时报有限公司对其准确性或完整性不作任何陈述,投资者不应依赖这些信息进行投资决策。
在某些司法管辖区,页面所列基金的权益销售可能受到法律限制,且基金不一定向所有发行地区的公众开放。如有疑问,应咨询专业顾问。数据由ICE整理。本版所列基金价格及其他信息亦可在金融时报网站(www.ft.com / funds)查询。页面所列基金价格可能随投资公司价值变动而变化。除非另有说明,价格为实时价格。如有变动,则显示为相对于上一报价的变动(并非所有基金每日更新价格)。以美元标注的价格可能包含或不包含前期费用。周二至周六报纸版本中的收益率百分比已考虑购买费用。
某些较早期保险联动计划的价格在销售时可能需缴纳资本利得税。
OEIC(开放式投资公司):类似于单位信托,但采用公司而非信托结构。发行不同股份类别以反映不同货币、收费结构或持有人类型。
买入价(Bid price):也称卖出价,即投资者出售单位信托份额时的价格。
卖出价(Offer price):也称买入价,即投资者购买单位信托份额时的价格(含管理费初始费用)。
单一价格:基于基础投资的中间市场估值。OEIC股份及单一价格单位信托的买卖价格相同。
管理费定期资本费用处理:24个月和36个月;采用该期间的总收益(或亏损)计算24个月和36个月年化业绩表现。业绩公式已调整,以考虑参考期内的收益分配。
收益率:使用基金预计年度收入除以最新可用净资产值计算。
数据提供方
报纸上刊登的价格为管理人 / 运营方提供的最新价格。此广告服务的收费基于发布行数及基金分类。进一步咨询请联系data@ft.com。其他查询请联系newspapers@ice.com



一处海滨废墟、一座宗教改革时期的堡垒、玛丽女王的囚室以及特威德河畔的高塔,为你带来充满氛围的戏水之旅。撰文:穆尔·迪基
在苏格兰旅行的众多乐趣中,很少有能像看到该国一座历史悠久的城堡并深入了解其丰富历史那样,给人留下如此深刻的印象。而再没有什么比在清澈的水中畅游更能让一天变得更加难忘了。
苏格兰许多最优秀的城堡都建在湖泊、河流或海洋的风景如画的岸边,这些位置往往让它们更容易防守。有些城堡是为了守卫战略水道或为海上力量提供安全基地而建。
几乎所有城堡都有宏大的传奇故事,源自其动荡的过去。尽管苏格兰的水域可能有点寒冷,但我总发现,跳入水中能让人切身感受到融入风景的感觉,并常常为熟悉的景色带来全新的视角。
在苏格兰,所谓的“野外游泳”越来越受欢迎,这里广泛的“漫游权”*意味着只要你判断安全且不会对野生动植物造成伤害或骚扰,大多数水域都不会阻止你进入。以下是四个从爱丁堡出发触手可及的最佳游泳地点。
苏格兰最宏伟的中世纪要塞之一,坦塔隆城堡矗立在福斯湾(Firth of Forth)向外突出的高岬上,距离爱丁堡以东约一小时车程。如今它已成为一座庞大的废墟,游客可从陆侧轻松进入城堡。但何不沿着岩石海岸步行至城堡东侧,并在条件允许时短暂游入福斯湾?这将为您呈现城堡天然与人工防御工事的壮观视角。
城堡海侧陡峭的悬崖、宽阔的干护城河、宏伟的城门楼以及南侧厚实的砂岩城墙,共同构筑了坦塔隆的坚固堡垒。
1528年,詹姆斯五世国王对叛乱的第六代安格斯伯爵阿奇博尔德·道格拉斯发动围攻,在城墙经受皇家大炮20天轰炸后,仍未能攻克堡垒。据后来道格拉斯所言,苏格兰历史上从未有过如此“pane travell expensis and diligence”(痛苦、旅程、开销与勤勉)被如此徒劳地耗费于“wynnyng of ane house”(夺取一座房屋)。
坦塔隆城堡(北贝里克附近,东洛锡安)左侧;图为图伊德河上嬉戏的游泳者(右上);玛丽女王曾被囚禁的洛赫利文城堡(下方) Michael Vince Kim / Iain Masterton / Alamy Stock Photo
在坦塔隆坚守阵地之际,道格拉斯效仿其14世纪先祖——安格斯与马尔伯爵夫人玛格丽特。这位寡居的苏格兰东北部地产继承人曾作为第一代道格拉斯伯爵的情妇与其子的母亲在此城堡生活。然而,当伯爵及其继任者相继离世后,她被勒令将坦塔隆归还其封建领主——法夫伯爵。
玛格丽特并未顺从屈服,而是在坦塔隆召集当地绅士与亲属,在1388至1389年冬季坚守城堡,直至法夫伯爵做出让步,承诺允许伯爵夫人继续留居城堡并支持她、她的部下与领地,“agayns ony that wald wrang thaim”(以对抗任何试图冒犯他们的人)。这一和解巩固了玛格丽特支持者的地位,并为她安排私生子乔治成为新一代安格斯伯爵铺平了道路。它同时展现了在男权时代,独立自主的贵族女性所能施展的影响力与权威。
坦塔隆的城墙后来在1651年被奥利弗·克伦威尔的现代火炮所摧毁,后者在征服苏格兰的战争中占领该地,但城堡的废墟在19世纪激发了作家沃尔特·司各特与画家亚历山大·内史密斯的想象力。
内史密斯从海岸眺望城堡的画作,配以狂风暴雨的海面与沉船,成为苏格兰浪漫主义绘画的杰作。若想寻找类似视角并进行一场极佳的游泳体验——尽管仅在风平浪静的天气下——可乘坐公交或驾车前往西崖海滩。最近的公交站位于奥尔德海姆农场,海滩设有付费停车场。从西崖出发,沿着岩石间的小旧港口向西步行。注意勿在涨潮时绕过任何岬角,以确保能轻松返回。
这是另一座悬崖顶要塞,位于爱丁堡东北方向约一个半小时车程的圣安德鲁斯城堡,曾是数百年来天主教高级神职人员的居所,后在16世纪席卷苏格兰的新教改革中沦为战场。
正是在这里,1546年,大卫·比顿主教主持了对福音派传教士乔治·威沙特的“审判”,后者被定罪后在城堡墙外被绞死并焚尸。数月后,愤怒的当地领主和福音派人士攻占城堡,杀死比顿并将其尸体悬挂于城墙之上。随后围城战反复无常,引起英格兰注意——英格兰支持新教叛军,而天主教法国则是苏格兰传统盟友,也是其太后玛丽·德·吉斯(苏格兰女王玛丽之母)的故乡。
英格兰亨利八世通过海路运送补给支援被围困的城堡,帮助叛军坚持了一年多,但法国的干预最终成为决定性因素。1547年7月,法国国王亨利二世秘密派遣一支小舰队抵达圣安德鲁斯,由一位才华横溢的意大利指挥官率领,对苏格兰沿海水域了如指掌。数小时的海陆猛烈轰炸摧毁城堡城墙并瓦解守军意志。正如历史学家简·E·A·道森所言,此次袭击堪称“迅速摧毁要塞据点的经典战例”。

《金融时报》环球旅行家栏目:咖啡、鸡尾酒、高端餐饮、跑步、健身课程、绿色出行等精彩内容。
若想感受当年法国舰队所见之景,可乘坐公交或驾车前往圣安德鲁斯,步行至城堡沙滩——这是城堡下方的一处海滩。那里有一座虽破旧但仍常用的潮汐泳池(退潮时可游泳),而胆大的游泳者则可继续向外游去,以更佳视角观赏城堡向海一侧的悬崖与城墙。
这是苏格兰塔式城堡强烈垂直造型的典范,其独特而如画的风格为当地景观增色不少。与许多同类塔楼相比,它的防御性更强,可能建于14世纪末或15世纪,耸立在爱丁堡以南约一小时车程的特威德河畔陡峭斜坡上。从水面望去,它气势恢宏,令人印象深刻。
与沿海的坦塔朗城堡类似,尼德帕斯也在17世纪克伦威尔的炮火中沦陷,这充分展现了苏格兰防御建筑的过时。但与规模更大的沿海城堡不同,尼德帕斯此后仍有人居住。它甚至与苏格兰启蒙运动有过一段渊源:1795年,它成为历史学家兼哲学家亚当·弗格森的居所,后者被广泛视为现代社会学的奠基人之一。
弗格森从昆斯伯里公爵处租下此处,为城堡的美景所倾倒。他写道:“树林、群山与河流如同天堂乐土,空气中充满了生命的气息。”这一感受想必也能引起现代游客的共鸣。不过,他发现冬季的条件更为艰苦。据一位传记作者所述,弗格森“虽能掌控情感如斯多葛派哲人一般”,但“尼德帕斯的居住条件对他来说却是对哲学的严峻考验”。
若想在温暖的日子里从水面欣赏尼德帕斯,可乘坐公交或驾车前往皮布尔斯,从那里沿着南特威德出发,步行一条简易的环形路线,穿过旧高架桥后向东折返,直接从城堡下方经过。

尼德帕斯西侧不远处有一处备受欢迎的游泳点,从那里可将城堡及其绿树掩映的河岸尽收眼底;但若想获得最震撼的视觉体验,则需前往城堡下方的小沙滩。从那里望去,古老的城墙高耸入云,与天空形成鲜明对比。河水湍急,涨水时切勿下水。
圣安德鲁斯围城之战的结束并未终结苏格兰在宗教与外交忠诚上的角力。精明能干的玛丽·德·吉斯作为摄政,竭力维护天主教信仰及与法国的联系。但当她的女儿玛丽·苏格兰女王于1561年8月从法国返回苏格兰行使王权时,新教已在民众与分裂的贵族中占据主导,与新教英格兰的联系也日益紧密。
尽管年轻的玛丽凭借宗教宽容与个人魅力在最初几年稳住了统治,但不到七年,一系列政治失误与灾难性联盟便将她置于耻辱的囚禁之地——洛赫利文城堡。
城堡坐落于距离浩瀚的利文湖湖岸半英里的一座小岛上,位于爱丁堡与圣安德鲁斯之间的中途。对废黜玛丽的“贵族联盟”而言,这里似乎是最牢固的囚禁之所。玛丽因战败与双胞胎流产的创伤,再加上极端的心理压力,最终同意退位,将王位让与襁褓中的儿子詹姆斯。但她一旦恢复健康,便立即开始策划逃脱。被囚禁还不到一年,她就赢得了洛赫利文城堡家仆中几位年轻成员的支持。
其中一人,一个被称为“小威利”的侍童,答应划船将她渡过湖面。5月2 1568,威利在城堡的船只中除了一艘外全部毁坏,随后趁城堡主一家用餐时,用偷来的钥匙为玛丽打开了主门。在湖岸边,另一位仰慕者已备好马匹等候。
数日内,一支6,000人的军队便聚集在玛丽麾下。然而,在格拉斯哥附近战败后的惊慌中,她逃往英格兰——这一决定最终导致她长期被囚并最终被处决。这是历史上最浪漫王室逃脱之一的悲惨结局。
19世纪部分排水工程使利文湖水位下降,岛屿面积随之扩大,但从水面望去,城堡的景象对昔日的高贵囚徒而言依然熟悉。若想从水上观赏,可乘坐公交或驾车至金罗斯,步行至柯克门公园,那里有一处宜人的沙滩。夏季湖中可能出现有毒蓝绿藻水华,请查看警示牌或向当地人咨询,如发现任何迹象应避免下水。
*注:苏格兰法律赋予负责任者广泛的土地与水域通行权,但“野泳”始终由个人承担风险。为避免未知危险与潜在的危险冷水休克,入水时务必谨慎。游泳前请根据自身能力仔细规划路线,并提前了解强流、潮汐、藻华或污染情况。
海蒂·雷格纳斯医生的声音温和而让人安心。她正在与一位膝关节疼痛的关节炎患者交谈,并为其制定了一个“以最自然的方式”让膝关节“再生”的方案。
她解释说,答案在于干细胞——人体内能够自我更新并转化为其他细胞类型的母细胞。“干细胞很棒,”她对这位假扮成患者的《金融时报》记者说,“取自新生儿……[它们可以]被输送到你身体的各个部位。”
雷格纳斯当时在洛杉矶Chara Health诊所工作,她描述了如何从捐赠的脐带和胎盘中提取干细胞,以修复组织并减少炎症。
为达到“最佳效果”,她建议将干细胞直接注射入膝关节,并通过静脉注射到血液中。该疗法的费用为$18,450。
雷格纳斯并未提及该疗法在科学上未获证实,且根据联邦法律,其销售属于非法行为。她也未提及Chara Health的所有者曾两次收到美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的警告,因其推广未经批准的新药。去年的最新谴责还指出,FDA检查人员发现了多项制造违规行为,包括缺失捐赠者资格记录及将过期产品重新贴标为在保质期内。
相反,雷格纳斯对风险问题一笔带过:“感染和出血的风险始终存在,但这些产品经过非常、非常严格的筛选,因此这些风险极其微小。”一位管理员随后通过邮件发送了一份诊所声称干细胞可受益的数十种疾病清单,从自闭症到糖尿病和勃起功能障碍。
自20世纪50年代以来,医学已在骨髓移植和皮肤移植等治疗中利用干细胞的再生特性。科学家正在研究其对帕金森病到心脏问题等疾病的潜在有效性。然而,尽管在某些特定疾病上取得了鼓舞人心的突破,但这些其他治疗用途在很大程度上仍属假设,仅限于研究和临床试验。
然而在美国,越来越多的制造商和从业者正在直接向美国公众兜售干细胞产品的空头承诺。这些疗法被包装成延长寿命和治愈慢性疾病的“门票”,从昔日专属于探索海外长寿疗法的超级富豪,扩展至吸引工薪阶层的街头诊所。
这是一个充斥着伪科学主张、虚假产品和似乎不受联邦执法威胁的名誉扫地医生的市场。金融时报对曾受FDA关注的诊所进行调查发现,许多诊所无视监管机构的警告,通过新网站、委婉营销、误导性声明和半开玩笑的合规幌子继续运营,几乎与从前别无二致。
根据加州大学欧文分校健康伦理中心主任利·特纳的研究,在2000年代末仅提供未经证实干细胞疗法的几家诊所到2016年已增至近600家,2021年更超过2,700家。特纳尚未发布更新的数据,但表示“尽管监管活动有所增加,市场仍在扩张”。
专家表示,在罗伯特·F·肯尼迪(Robert F Kennedy Jr)出任美国卫生部长的情况下,局势可能会进一步恶化。他曾表示,安提瓜的一项干细胞疗法“极大地”帮助了他,并誓言结束美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对另类医学的“战争”,包括“针对干细胞的战争”。包括乔·罗根和金·卡戴珊在内的广受追捧的人物也提高了这些疗法的知名度,公开赞扬墨西哥和巴拿马的疗法,这些地区的合法诊所可以合法开展干细胞疗法。
“这是一个重大的公共卫生问题,”国际干细胞研究学会(ISSCR)前主席肖恩·莫里森表示,“不仅[提供商]经常推广对患者毫无益处的疗法,而且这些疗法确实有很大潜在危害。”
例如,在查拉健康公司(Chara Health),还有一件雷根纳斯没有提到的事。几个月前,加州医疗委员会对她发起纪律程序,指控其在一项吸脂和脂肔移植手术中存在“反复疏忽行为”。2023年和2025年,她因在三名女性身上进行类似手术后导致其死亡,被家属以医疗事故起诉。
雷根纳斯否认存在任何疏忽
曾花费$6,000接受“虚假”干细胞疗法的斯韦塔·帕特尔表示,她接受的其他疗法确实有效,但不道德的提供商数量增加,使得难以将其主张与基于合法科学研究的主张区分开来。下图:肖恩·戈达德从美国前往墨西哥接受干细胞疗法,险些导致瘫痪(Dario Pignatelli / FT, Alamy;Ray Di Pietro / FT)
并坚称其护理未导致这些女性死亡。其中一起案件已和解,另一起已驳回,第三起仍在进行中。雷根纳斯和查拉健康公司未回应置评请求。
“可以将细胞环境视为一个严格控制且平衡的生态系统,”国际干细胞研究学会公共政策委员会成员祖宾·马斯特解释道。他表示,即使短暂地将细胞从该生态系统中移除,也意味着“它可能不再表现如初”。马斯特说:“这就是为什么细胞替代疗法如此复杂和具有挑战性。”
例如,英国正在研发的一项心力衰竭治疗方法历经20年研究才进入临床试验的最终阶段。
在美国,今年发表的一项同行评审研究测试了六种商业脐带“干细胞”产品,发现它们“几乎完全缺乏活细胞”,这意味着该疗法从原理上就无法奏效。
专家们的担忧不仅关乎疗效。首次开发骨髓移植时,早期临床试验中的患者死亡。“这实际上花费了数十年时间才弄清如何安全地将骨髓移植输送给患者,”前国际干细胞研究学会(ISSCR)主席莫里森表示。
从广义上讲,这些说法确实有其道理。但认为获取这些益处的方法仅需提取干细胞并将其移植到所需部位的想法则是错误的。
若缺乏监管试验,未经批准疗法造成的有害事件规模便无法确定。但已向美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)分享的信息表明此类事件正在上升。据《金融时报》对监管机构不良事件数据库的分析,FDA在2025年收到17起与干细胞或其他未经批准的人体组织产品相关的不良事件报告,而前一年仅为5起。
皮尤研究中心对科学期刊、报纸和其他公开来源的回顾发现,2004年至2020年间记录的不良事件超过330起,其中包括导致患者终身残疾的案例和20起报告死亡案例。
许多寻求干细胞疗法的人是数万亿美元产业的一部分,该产业追求“长寿”的难以捉摸的目标。这些疗法通常与多肽和其他未经证实的注射剂结合销售,处于健康科学文化战争的前沿。
但这些疗法也越来越多地针对那些渴望摆脱痛苦而非死亡的人群。
沙恩·戈达德(Shane Goddard)十几岁时因越野摩托车事故导致脊髓损伤,留下永久性跛行和右腿疼痛。2022年,这位41岁的男子从田纳西州前往墨西哥的Giostar诊所,并支付了15,695美元购买“1.4 亿”脐带干细胞注入脊椎。
不久之后,戈达德出现高烧和背部灼痛。“感觉像是热沥青夹在我的肩胛骨之间,”他说道。几周后,戈达德开始失去手指活动能力,腿部“拖拽如同被车撞过的动物”。扫描显示感染性脓肿正在压迫他的脊髓。医生告诉他若不立即手术,次日可能瘫痪。戈达德最终住院六周,至今仍无法使用双手。“我本希望通过这些干细胞变得更好,结果却让我变得更糟,”他说道。
Giostar未回复置评请求。
在美国,新药物和生物制品需获FDA批准。该机构通常要求通过临床试验证明其安全有效。未经批准擅自营销此类产品属违法行为。
在2010年代末,经过多年宽松监管后,FDA向多家干细胞公司发出大量警告信,并公开承诺将加强执法力度。
“FDA意识到……情况已失控,”莫里森表示,“问题是,即使FDA开始更积极地行动……他们实际上没有足够资源去追查大量违法公司。”
Instead, the regulator and justice department focused on the worst actors. In 2024, a California-based stem cell product manufacturer was sentenced to 36 months in prison for distributing unapproved new drugs. The injectables, made from umbilical cord cells, had been linked to the hospitalisation of 19 people. In 2019, a federal court brought an injunction against a clinic in Florida after three patients who received stem cell products harvested from their own fat went blind.
But such high-profile cases have not had a chilling effect. Of the 25 organisations that have received FDA warning letters for marketing unapproved stem cell products since 2021, the FT found that many appeared to have continued to flout the regulator's rules – a situation the FDA says it is aware of.
"Warning letters and enforcement actions are done to give a signal [in industries] where well-behaving people will tighten up their behaviour, but here you are dealing with a rogue industry," says Robert Califf, a former FDA commissioner. "This is outside of that."
Dr Alvaro Skupin, the founder of Mother Stem Institute in Florida, for example, was put on notice by the FDA in September 2024. The year before, Skupin settled a lawsuit brought against him by a woman who claimed that a stem cell treatment he injected into her eyes left her blind. (Skupin denied any wrongdoing.)
But during a phone consultation with an FT reporter purporting to be a prospective patient, Skupin downplayed the risk of his procedures and made sweeping pseudoscientific claims. Claiming to have a "94 per cent" success rate, he said that extracting a patient's blood and "burning a laser" would produce "pluripotent stem cells" that could "improve the knees, the tendons, the bones, maybe the prostate" when reinjected.
The website of a family discussing their autistic son did not mention stem cells, instead referring unspecifically to “the Innate Healthcare Institute therapy” he had.
When approached by an FT reporter posing as a patient who has an autistic daughter, a doctor at Innate suggested injecting the “kiddo” with stem cells through an IV and using a nasal spray. “It’s very effective for autism,” she said, adding that the clinic had treated children as young as two before. “We have to be careful about how we market it because of our government in the US . . . It’s not a ‘treatment,’” she said, making air quotes and smiling knowingly. “It’s an experimental option.”
“Whatever damage is done to almost any organ. Diabetes also. It will get better,” Skupin continued. He offered the reporter a “Father’s day special” discount and said the treatment could make him feel 10 years younger.
Other clinics have taken creative approaches to toeing the regulatory line. In August 2025, the FDA wrote to the Innate Healthcare Institute in Arizona, warning it to stop marketing unapproved stem cell therapies. The letter highlighted a customer statement on Innate's website that said: "Stem cell therapy has really helped our son with his autism."
'Not only are [providers] commonly marketing things that have no potential to benefit the patients, but they do have a very real potential to harm people'
Skupin and Innate Healthcare Institute did not respond to a request for comment.
未经批准的干细胞疗法的法律环境近年来因与联邦监管相抵触的新州法律而变得复杂。
“如果你想在干预措施上花钱,就应该只在收益大于风险时才这样做”
自2024年以来,佛罗里达、犹他和怀俄明等州已通过法案,允许医生在特定条件下实施未经批准的干细胞疗法。地方法律无法取代联邦执法,但Master(ISSCR公共政策委员会成员)表示,他注意到公众中存在“相当程度的困惑”。“当人们在一个州看到‘购买需谨慎’的警示,而在另一个州却没有时,这令人困惑,”他说道。
一些诊所正在利用这一复杂环境。例如,Chara Health在营销材料中声称其干细胞产品“完全未经操控,使其符合组织移植而非药物标准”。但监管机构在2019年和2025年向该诊所创始人Joy Kong博士发出的警告信中指出,这一说法是错误的。
FDA表示,干细胞疗法是“一个积极且日益升级的执法重点”。该局补充称,“保护患者……是机构核心且持久的工作,无论外部环境如何”。
一些患者表示,是否使用干细胞疗法的决定应由他们自己决定,而非政府决定。
2023年,Sweta Patel在犹他州花费6,000加元接受了一项“无效”干细胞治疗,但她并未感受到明显效果。然而,由于多种自身免疫性疾病导致的慢性疼痛,Patel表示过去接受的其他干细胞治疗“判若云泉”地改善了她的症状。她认为,该行业充斥不道德从业者的部分原因在于其被迫游离于监管之外。“我们这些罕见或被误解疾病的患者最容易受到剥削,”她说。
卫生部长Kennedy也附和这一观点。他去年表示,FDA不应“告诉医生能开什么药或不能开什么药”,也不应限制人们服用何种药物。“如果你想服用实验性药物……你应该有权利这样做,”他说道。
但许多专家并不认同。ISSCR的Morrison表示:“单个患者甚至他们的医生既没有时间、专业知识,也没有获取必要数据的渠道,无法真正做出明智的决定,判断某个实验性再生医学产品是否真的有潜在助益。”
尽管Califf承认“这里需要灵活思维,而监管体系难以轻松应对”,但他也反驳称FDA审批门槛过高的说法。“如果你想在干预措施上花钱,就应该只在收益大于风险时才这样做。我们完全清楚如何判断收益是否大于风险……这被称为充分且控制良好的临床试验。”
但就目前而言,对不法诊所的严厉打击似乎不太可能。当被问及美国卫生部长是否会阻碍执法行动时,Califf表示:“RFK是美国未经证实且可能危险疗法的最强支持者。FDA向RFK报告。所以这基本上是一个反问。”
每年8月下旬,美国西部怀俄明州的夜间气温下降,会让斯内克河中的鳟鱼在入冬前陷入疯狂觅食。这种最佳垂钓条件最早吸引时任美联储主席保罗·沃尔克——这位前任主席和热心飞蝇钓鱼爱好者——在此举办美联储年度会议。杰克逊霍尔研讨会汇聚各国央行行长、财政部长和经济学家,讨论货币政策、建立人脉,偶尔也会抛竿垂钓。
与鳟鱼一样,现任美联储主席Kevin Warsh也面临着未来几个月的严峻挑战——而众多市场参与者将在今天仔细研读其杰克逊霍尔演讲,寻找他计划如何应对这些挑战的信号。与伊朗的持续冲突为市场注入不确定性,油价仍高于战前水平。通胀率持续高于央行2%目标。美国政府债务不断攀升,且因收益率上升而变得更加沉重。
大规模投入AI基础设施建设似乎正在推高借贷利率,挤压经济其他部门,并为货币政策制定者提出重要问题。财政部长斯科特·贝森特(Scott Bessent)在债券市场的干预进一步增加了复杂性,威胁到货币政策的制定方式。
但美联储主席面临的部分挑战却是他自己造成的。Warsh长期以来对央行向市场发布前瞻性指引持反感态度,但其稀疏的沟通风格却加剧了市场混乱。在外界难以洞悉其对经济状况关键问题的看法之际,投资者已将长期债券收益率推至2007年以来的最高水平。国际货币基金组织(IMF)已发布一份尖锐的报告,探讨“前瞻性指引的当前问题”。Warsh本人似乎也意识到未能成功向市场传达其对价格稳定的承诺,但他并未因此改变立场。
当然,这些问题在很大程度上是其设计使然。Warsh关注的是更长期债券的更高利率如何减少借贷并抑制通胀,这种非常规做法确实有一定道理。但机构信誉问题也随之而来。Warsh将注意力从美联储加息的通胀压力上转移,默许了唐纳德·特朗普总统对更低短期利率的偏好。倘若美联储主席被视为在政治上偏袒,市场可能会惩罚美债和加元。
联邦政府其他政策部门也曾讨论过降低借贷成本的措施,从贝森特计划将长期债券购买规模翻倍,到总统在讨论债券市场时提到的军事干预等奇特言论。这些事件 unsurprisingly 并未让债券投资者感到安心。就连曾担任Warsh和贝森特导师的斯坦利·德鲁肯米勒(Stanley Druckenmiller)也反对财政部扮演过大角色,宣称“政府试图通过捍卫价格对抗基本面的做法总是会失败”。
Warsh的杰克逊霍尔演讲可能是一个重新获得市场信任的机会。许多前任主席都曾利用这一时刻调整政策,例如本·伯南克在2010年发表的关键演讲,宣布额外资产购买计划。Warsh虽多次口头承诺维护央行独立性和2%通胀目标,但若缺乏具体实现路径,这些承诺便毫无意义。其不愿提供更多政策思路的犹豫已催生出不确定性溢价,影响从住房抵押贷款到新兴市场主权债务的融资成本。投资者希望其演讲能开始缓解这种不确定性。


Economists是时尚界的敏感群体。在2000年代和2010年代,与新兴数字公司合作曾是一股潮流。2020年,他们像Instagram博主学习烘焙面包一样,热衷于新冠肺炎研究。如今,关注AI并与AI实验室合作成为热点。尽管某些风险与过去有相似之处,但这次感觉截然不同。
其中一个不同之处在于AI引发的问题规模空前。修补出租车或酒店市场与探索可能从根本上重塑社会的技术完全是两码事。在2000年代和2010年代,数字革命吸引了明星研究者并提出新问题。但由于AI革命的规模更大、范围更广,如今存在一个“完全不同的吸引力规模”
“声音”,本·戈卢布表示,他是一位拥有自己AI创业公司的学者。
随着AI为经济学家提供一种分析工具和研究对象,一个有趣的趋势是,顶级经济学家要么与AI公司合作,要么直接为其工作。戈卢布表示,今年出现了“认知上的不连续变化”,因为AI实验室现在被视为“超高价值的知识场所”。这有助于它们拥有详细的数据来描述AI的使用情况,这是评估其经济影响的关键。
AI相关创业公司对经济学家的争夺可能会被愤世嫉俗地视为一场公关策略。相比发布华而不实的新闻稿,来自分析能力高超的极客的可信数据分析更有可能引起媒体关注。在分享了对企业在AI工具上的支出分析后,Ramp首席经济学家阿拉·哈拉齐安表示,他收到了来自寻求组建自身经济学团队的AI创业公司的大量咨询请求。
但规模较大的AI实验室似乎有着更宏大的抱负,即为关于其技术的讨论注入证据。意识到AI的颠覆性潜力,谷歌、Anthropic和OpenAI的研究人员被赋予了告知辩论的任务,涉及AI对劳动力市场、全球不平等和宏观经济的影响。一位谷歌研究员向我描述其研究议程时,将其视为企业责任的一部分。
显而易见的风险是,更紧密的合作可能会扭曲经济研究的方向。为什么AI实验室会愿意发布研究显示其产品让工作变得更无意义或更紧张?它们会像支持那些对AI对创业影响持乐观态度的研究者那样,热衷于支持那些警告AI会削弱技能投资的研究者吗?
在上一轮科技繁荣期间,“捕获”曾是一个挑战,因为科技公司控制着谁能访问其庞大的数据库,并对数据的使用方式拥有私利。最近的一项研究指出,使用平台提供数据发表的欧洲论文中,有关消费者影响的研究比例过高,而关于劳动权利的研究则相对较少(诚然,他们仅统计了31项此类研究)。
在询问参与此轮科技浪潮的一些经济学家时,我听到了谨慎的乐观,认为利益冲突是可以管理的。尽管实验室可能确实吸引了那些认为AI意义重大的经济学家,但这些研究人员在AI将如何发展的问题上也存在分歧。有研究人员指出,Anthropic首席执行官达里奥·阿莫代并未承诺AI会带来彩虹和阳光。
在AI实验室内部,经济学家们一直在思考如何确保自身的可信度。今年早些时候,Anthropic的经济学团队发布了一套衡量AI驱动的劳动力市场破坏的框架。首席经济学家彼得·麦克罗里解释称,通过将研究方法固定化,将无法压制不利结果。实验室似乎也比前辈更倾向于公开分享数据,尽管尚不足以消除内部人士的优势。
至于合作,目前尚不清楚研究审批流程将有多繁琐。一位研究人员表示,他认为OpenAI的资助金额不足以让高层压制或篡改结果。经济学家们有自己的声誉要维护;其中几位与实验室合作的人目前只是从大学岗位上暂时离岗。
话虽如此,随着公众对AI的反对声浓厚,对AI实验室施加的压力也将增大,迫使其积极塑造有利于其技术的叙事。而在这些压力最强烈的地方,拥有与实验室保持一定距离的研究人员将至关重要。毕竟,与上一轮科技繁荣相比,这次的利害关系更大。
soumaya.keynes@ft.com
Letters
如对《金融时报》对您投诉的回应不满,您可向《金融时报》编辑投诉专员申诉:complaints.commissioner@ft.com
美国财政部长斯科特·贝森(《金融时报》8月25日评论文章《一场针对伊朗的经济“诺曼底登陆日”即将来临》)延续了唐纳德·特朗普总统对其六个月前发动战争的合理挫败感。
伊朗已明确表示特朗普的诸多说法不过是空口大话。最初他声称战争将持续四或五周,尽管也提到可能更长(讽刺的是,这是他说过的唯一一句实话),此前他还曾放言“彻底且完全摧毁”了伊朗的核能力。今年3月,他又声称“从字面上摧毁”了伊朗的军事能力。
您对8月7日报道的一篇关于AI生成合成病毒的新论文的报道确实抓住了一个真正的里程碑,约翰斯·霍普金斯大学的托马斯·英格斯比和莫里茨·汉克指出现有治理框架无法应对生成基因组学如今所能实现的可能性。正如他们在《科学》杂志上所言:“问题不再是这种技术是否会出现,而是监管是否能跟上其发展步伐。”
阿拉斯加州安克雷奇,美国
建立监管体系至关重要,但这需要数年时间。然而,既然我们资助了创造这些能力的研究,就应同步投入资源并优先提升韧性,为这些能力最终可能带来的后果做好准备。其中一种方式是改善学校通风系统,普通呼吸道病毒在这些场所广泛传播,而儿童也会成为将病毒传入社区的不成比例的推动力。
安迪·伯纳姆承诺提升地方议会在商业街规划权的做法值得肯定。
他似乎并未理解经济现实已发生改变:巴西、中国,甚至加拿大都已站出来反对他;他们并未屈服。不出所料,美国在全球GDP中的份额日益缩小,手中的牌已不多,而一个恃强凌弱者能对其他国家施加的影响终究有限。当涉及国家主权问题时尤其如此。在政治上屈服可能变得不可行。
我们也曾在商业街拥有类似的店铺,但那已是很久以前的事了。它们曾是德沃斯特这样的屠户名店、三厨面包房和麦克鱼市。
但首相也需要前往法国,亲眼看看这个国家如何帮助小店生存并蓬勃发展。法国的小商业(petits commerces)至今仍是当地日常生活的核心。我指的是面包店、糕点店和熟食店的普遍存在。
法国之所以能保留至今,仅仅是因为他们的规划法规严格限制并监管任何合并店铺的提案。此类项目需申请建筑许可证,无论是结构改动还是外立面变更。
即使特朗普不在乎其日渐下滑的支持率,在真正的民主国家,政府也会在意此类
另一项帮助法国小店的措施是其1968年颁布的法律,禁止超市在电视上投放广告。这帮助传统街区商店与大型超市竞争。在欧盟委员会的压力下,法国最终在38年后取消了这项电视广告禁令,但此时该措施已成功嵌入法国的小商业体系。
我们都记得那句归于拿破仑·波拿巴的话:英格兰是一个店主的国家。他意指我们是一个 ambition 不足的国家,过于沉迷商业,无法与法国军队匹敌。
如今伯纳姆寻求增加军费开支,或许他也能采纳上述部分(或全部)法国措施,保护我们的小商业(petits commerces),从而消除拿破仑的诋毁,真正让我们再次成为一个店主的国家。
伦敦 SM4,英国 市议员斯蒂芬·阿兰布里蒂斯
阅读您8月26日关于数据中心融资风险的《深度报道》后,我认为整篇文章可以用保险业者所指出的“鸡生蛋还是蛋生鸡”问题来概括——即“他们缺乏数据来评估数据中心面临的风险,这使得他们更加谨慎”。
正如反对数据中心建设的抗议活动可被英国讽刺杂志《私眼》的精辟观察所概括——“当地人对他们的供水系统有着深厚的感情”,我也感受到保罗·特鲁奥克斯1981年小说《蚊蚊海岸》中那种氛围,以及小说主人公阿利·福克斯在洪都拉斯闷热环境中用氢和氨驱动的“胖小子”制冰机的灾难性爆炸。
或许文中提到的保险业者在等待数据的同时,也该读读这部小说。 简·斯旺 英国康沃尔郡德拉霍拉
中国是伊朗石油的最大买家,该国的关键出口产品。中国利用其对稀土、矿物和磁铁的控制权,对特朗普(非法)关税进行反击——特朗普在2025年10月达成了一项更合理的协议后退缩,这一协议距今还不到一年。
此外,世界各国政府意识到,与特朗普达成的协议一文不值。
虽然美国尚未披露其发动的这场新经济战的细节,但倘若贝森的威胁要产生真正影响,中国必须让步——这不太可能是对其经济主权的妥协,也再次证明协议
《金融时报》“Your Big Read”(《阿联酋对非洲的帝国式扩张》,8月4日)刊发的一则指控称,被盗苏丹央行黄金从南苏丹空运至阿联酋。苏丹冲突诚然是一场悲剧,亟需全球严肃关注,但该报道将私人运输的所谓行为与暗示主权国家采购的行为混为一谈,且未提供任何实质性证据支持上述任何一点。
阿联酋作为主权国家,不购买或进口商业黄金。所谓的目的地和航线既不能证明一般采购行为,也不能证明国家采购行为。本应引发你们质疑的是:一家银行劫案中多批黄金如何被秘密追踪,跨越非洲大陆数百英里,分别向多个方向行进,最终在南苏丹某机场会合。
你们称,未指明数量的黄金进入乍得——该国与所谓出发港之间隔着苏丹本身和中非共和国。若黄金确实穿越多个多孔边境和中转枢纽,问责应贯穿整个链条,而非基于拼凑匿名且不合情理的叙述,将责任归咎于单一国家。
这批黄金共1.5吨,仅占阿联酋年黄金进口量的0.1%。若暗示阿联酋主权当局会为不足市场交易额0.1%的份额而冒损害国际声誉和监管合规的风险,这既违背商业逻辑,也有悖战略理性。
阿联酋承认追踪黄金难度极大,远超你们文章所暗示的程度。需要澄清的是,阿联酋是为数不多将伦敦金银市场协会(LBMA)《负责任黄金指导原则》纳入联邦法律的国家之一,并与经合组织“冲突地区及高风险地区矿产供应链尽职调查指导原则”对接。该框架要求在该国每家获许可精炼厂开展风险评估、独立审查及报告。
阿联酋为推进关键矿产供应链透明度感到自豪。因此,我诚挚邀请《金融时报》记者及编辑出席今年11月在迪拜举办的迪拜贵金属大会,以便你们亲自考察我们的监管框架及已公开的贸易账簿。
艾哈迈德·本·苏莱姆 阿联酋迪拜多种商品中心(DMCC)执行主席兼首席执行官
邮箱:letters.editor@ft.com
请附上日间联系电话及完整地址 勘误:corrections@ft.com
英国狩猎松鸡产业每年创造约£70mn的说法需要更多解释(“光荣的12日拉开英国狩猎季序幕,其未来前景仍存争议”,《金融时报》8月12日报道)。
该数字包含了许多相邻行业和活动的价值,而这些行动本身与狩猎松鸡无关。其次,应扣除这些狩猎庄园享受的大量公共资金。此外,在我们的高地上投入数百万英镑用于保护(尤其是泥炭地修复)是必要的,以修复自维多利亚时代这项运动兴起以来造成的损害。例如,为鼓励石南花生长并维持商业狩猎所需的大量松鸡数量而进行的大规模高沼地排水工程,其公共成本已覆盖了卡德代尔和斯韦尔代尔等地区,这些地区近年来饱受洪灾之苦,部分原因正是高沼地管理实践和集约化畜牧业放牧所致。
尽管这些庄园获得了此类支付,但研究发现,用于狩猎松鸡的泥炭地中仅有25%处于良好的生态状态(《国家自然状况报告》,英国自然保护联盟,2023年)。
此外,多年来,一些大型庄园因所谓的“公共利益”而享受遗产税豁免,但实际情况罕有如此,这也是重新思考高地用途的另一个理由。因此,这场争论不应局限于狩猎与重新野化这两种常被极化的观点,而应关注自然枯竭和气候危机的现实。我们的高地应成为物种丰富、引人入胜的自然空间,供人们探索。我们的高地属于公众,而非少数富裕精英。
乔纳森·赖利 “约克郡谷地之友”主席 英国北约克郡加格雷夫
阅读斯科特·贝森特那篇充满沙文主义色彩的专栏文章《针对伊朗的经济“诺曼底登陆日”即将到来》(《金融时报》8月25日),他错误地忽略了约瑟夫·斯大林——1943年德黑兰会议期间,斯大林也与罗斯福和丘吉尔一同出席。至于文章其他部分的准确性,我无法评判。
迈克·哈里斯 英国牛津
Stephen Miran
与一些评论家的断言相反,近期美国长期国债利率上升并不表明金融市场开始质疑美国债务的稳健性,也不表明美联储存在信誉问题。
要理解原因,我们可以将投资者获得的收益率分为实际成分和反映预期通胀的成分。最可靠的通胀预期衡量指标来自通胀掉期市场,该市场表现极为稳定;通胀预期在各期限和远期曲线上均与美联储2%目标一致。因此,将收益率上升与央行信誉挂钩是不恰当的——后者完全取决于市场对其能否实现通胀目标的预期,而市场目前丝毫没有对此表示怀疑。
相比之下,实际利率成分已出现上升。十年期实际收益率等于未来十年平均预期隔夜利率加上投资者为锁定十年资金所要求的风险溢价。这一期限溢价反映了实际隔夜利率可能偏离预期隔夜利率的事实。若市场察觉到财政信誉或债务可持续性问题,这将体现在期限溢价的上升。
但期限溢价同样保持稳定,自去年底以来仅略有下降。在期限溢价和通胀预期均受控的情况下,债券收益率近期上升几乎完全源于长期预期隔夜利率的上升。换言之,投资者正在上调对长期经济增长的预期,而非对央行或财政信誉产生担忧。市场或许正在认可人工智能、放松监管和更优税收政策正在为美国经济注入强劲动力。
经济增长更好对财政路径而言是利好消息。一条有用的经验法则是:经济增长率每提高一个百分点,赤字将减少约占GDP一个百分点,因为在繁荣的经济中,收入增长速度快于支出和利息支付。收益率上升有其合理原因,且效果良好。
近期美国赤字已大幅膨胀
暂时性因关税税率波动所致。今年2月,在最高法院裁定大幅削减关税之前,国会预算办公室曾预测2026年关税将带来$418bn收入,“超过自1934年以来企业所得税收入”。本应成为史上除所得税外最大的增税举措,却因超过$100bn的关税退税已付,导致净关税收入远低于预期,沦为暂时性的收入流失。
随着退税逐步结束,政府将关税税率恢复至先前水平,收入将重新回升。在关税收入波动与增长改善的双重作用下,主要赤字将很快开始下降。许多对赤字高声抱怨的人,恰恰也是最急于否决能减少赤字的关税收入的人。
随着伊朗冲突引发的能源冲击逐渐淡化,通胀和利率也将随之下行,进一步缩小赤字。诚然,在社会福利和遏制浪费性支出方面仍需做更多工作。但随着关税与增长改善的效应显现,长期财政问题将被进一步推迟。
收益率曲线的长端是流动性最差的部分,而8月则是流动性最差的月份。由于关税、增长与通缩带来的赤字缩减即将到来,财政部长斯科特·贝森特完全有理由通过提供额外流动性来抑制不必要的波动,并抵制过早延长债务期限(即拉长平均到期期限)的呼声。改善流动性有助于确保国债市场有序运行,这对金融稳定至关重要。
发行较短期限债务是应对暂时性赤字扩大的传统做法,也是常规且可预测的债务管理的关键部分。若赤字永久性扩大则是另一回事,但当前情况并非如此。如果赤字即将下降,却在收益率曲线长端人为制造不必要的过度波动,将是错误的举动。这对金融市场、美国工人和纳税人都有害无益。
就财政与货币信誉而言,美国目前处于有利位置,且所有迹象表明债券市场也认同这一判断。
作者为哈德逊湾资本高级策略师,曾任经济顾问委员会主席,并曾担任美联储理事会成员
科技
John Thornhill
人形机器人能做到惊人的事情。在本周北京举行的世界人形机器人大赛上,它们能跑步、拳击、踢足球、完成障碍赛并表演同步啦啦队动作。其中一台机器人甚至打破了尤塞恩·博尔特的100米短跑纪录(尽管未能及时减速,最终撞上了防护墙)。
这些壮举帮助中国领先的人形机器人开发商宇树科技在本月完成了上海证券交易所的超额认购上市。宇树科技的股价在首日交易中一度飙升,市值达到510亿加元,但此后已大幅回落。
在美国,埃隆·马斯克一直在夸夸其谈特斯拉Optimus机器人,该机器人正日益成为其电动汽车公司的核心焦点。马斯克预测,这种人形机器人“可能是史上最大的产品”,并长期预测其销售额可达10万亿加元。
在被誉为“机器人精英”的北京大赛上,人形机器人是绝对的明星,在YouTube上确实能引发轰动。但正如某些人类网红一样,你会怀疑它们除了娱乐我们之外是否还有其他用途。正如谚语所说,技术就是让机器像电影中那样行动,而这些机器人确实符合这一定位。但它们更可能成为展示用的“看家明星”,而非我们机器人未来的“主力劳力”。
在大赛中,人形机器人在更灵巧的任务上表现乏力,例如清理餐桌或为电动汽车充电。此外,一些机器人专家一直认为,模仿人类形态是构建最强大机器人的奇怪方式。人形机器人可能需要集成30个运动轴,而更简单的设计仅需一半数量即可完成类似功能。这可能使人形机器人成本更高且更笨拙。
全球已安装的非人形机器人绝大多数在设计上更实用,主要执行单一操作,因此在视觉上也逊色不少。这些机器人承担了人类不再愿做的枯燥、肮脏、精细或危险的工作。它们能组装汽车、在仓库中取货,并进行常规手术。世界各国军队也正在大规模部署无人机,这在俄乌战争中已展现出毁灭性威力。这些正是当前大多数机器人应用的领域,也是最有可能赚钱的地方。
目前,中国在工业机器人领域占据主导地位。国际机器人联合会估计,中国拥有约200万台工业机器人安装基数,是日本(全球第二大市场)的4.5倍。
机器人技术也是中国“15th Five-Year Plan”的核心。截至2024年,中国占据了全球工业机器人新增安装量的约54%,欧洲为16%,美国为6%。
与日本和韩国等其他亚洲国家一样,中国有强烈动机采用机器人来弥补老龄化劳动力的不足。部分因此原因,亚洲对机器人的接受度远高于美国或欧洲,为采用机器人铺平了道路。
作为全球软件超级大国,美国仍提供最优秀的机器人“大脑”。而创建标准机器人操作系统的奖
最终愿景是由协作机器人组成的社区通过共享“蜂巢”思维相互学习,其未来可能极为广阔。特朗普政府正试图通过限制主要来自中国的进口来推动本土机器人制造业发展。美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)刚刚以国家安全风险为由,阻止进口外国制造的类人机器人和四足机器人。
这也指向类人机器人可能证明其经济价值的一种方式:作为为未来发展提供数据的供应者。互联网为训练AI大型语言模型(如ChatGPT和Claude)提供了海量信息。但机器人专家迫切需要更多视觉和感知数据,以改善其创造物对物理世界的解读和响应能力。“机器人行业面临的巨大挑战之一是缺乏AI训练数据”,国际机器人联合会(IFR)秘书长苏珊娜·比勒告诉我。
机器人公司正在生成合成数据用于训练,最显著的例子是在自动驾驶汽车行业。诡异的是,一些AI公司还在收集所谓的自我中心数据,例如通过将摄像头固定在印度纺织工人的头部来捕捉他们的动作。此类开发引发了对隐私、安全和控制的明显担忧。但若这些问题能被克服,类人机器人作为协作机器人(或称协作机器人)与人类并肩工作,或可充当AI模型与现实世界的连接器。最终愿景是由协作机器人组成的社区通过共享集体“蜂巢”思维不断相互学习。
这种思路认为,“具身”AI驱动的机器人或许终将成为通往通用人工智能更有前景的路径——当AI在所有认知任务上匹敌人类之时。仅靠扩大语言模型规模是不够的。通过训练机器人感知、预测、行动、失败并适应环境,它们将发展出更强的因果推理能力和更高的自主性。若此终有一天实现,类人机器人或许终能获得其应有的主角地位,前提是届时它们已学会不再撞墙。
john.thornhill@ft.com

白宫网站向我们保证,“唐纳德·J·特朗普总统和副总统JD万斯正在对长期以来一直榨取辛勤工作的美国人的诈骗犯和骗子发动战争”。但仔细观察后发现,这种选择性令人不安,很少触及最大的违法者——对那些拥有政治或经济权力的人给予不应有的关照。
联邦政府应当起诉哪些犯罪长期以来一直是激烈争论的话题。例如,暴力犯罪历来被视为州和地方当局的责任。但自1980年代以来,两党都吹嘘自己在减少暴力犯罪方面的努力。而特朗普现在吹嘘在他就任总统之前就已开始的街头犯罪下降,这与联邦政府的努力几乎无关。与此同时,政府已明确表示,其更倾向于避免起诉严重的环境犯罪。
人们可能会认为,直接影响联邦政府的犯罪——尤其是剥夺政府运营所需资金的欺诈行为——应当是一个共识领域。但特朗普政府在强调福利欺诈的同时,放弃对大型企业和富有高管的案件,凸显了资源有限总会为政策选择留下空间。
这个问题并不新鲜,从一开始就塑造了联邦刑事执法。早期的美利坚合众国依赖关税收入——亚历山大·汉密尔顿及其后任财政部长大力倡导的关税。然而,当涉及追究那些通过欺诈剥夺政府这笔关键收入的商人时,负责联邦起诉的美国检察官——早在1870年司法部成立之前就已履职——和海关官员对船只和货物提起了没收诉讼。这种早期形式的企业刑事责任的优点在于,对违法者的处罚与其在企业中的利益成比例,但它允许个人逃脱个人刑事制裁。相比之下,盗窃邮政资金的邮政雇员则会被定期起诉,甚至可能面临死刑。
新的税务起诉重点很快主导了联邦刑事案件档案。但针对缺乏政治权力者的不成比例打击依然存在。大多数此类案件指控私酿者非法经营蒸馏器,而非开发复杂逃税策略的大型酒类或烟草公司。
20世纪联邦执法利益大幅扩张,随着时间的推移,与毒品和暴力犯罪相关的起诉开始在联邦档案中占据比税务案件更大比重。的确,在过去半个世纪里,联邦领导人因热衷不加税的支出而对税务执法日益敌视。严格的税务执法因此被政治化,拜登政府大幅增加IRS资金的举措在特朗普任内被逆转。
部分由于国会压力,针对低收入纳税人涉及劳动所得税收抵免欺诈的刑事起诉长期优先于高价值税务欺诈案。特朗普政府对IRS的削弱,加之其共和党盟友对福利欺诈(诚然,此类欺诈确实存在)的更响亮言论,只会加剧这种偏差,因为低价值案件通常更易且更廉价处理。
即使在医疗领域,白宫打击欺诈的承诺看似真诚,特朗普似乎仍将党派政治置于首位。其近期执法重点优先针对加利福尼亚和明尼苏达等蓝州,却未提供任何证据表明当地违法率更高。
在移民定罪(占全国联邦档案40.9%)之后,毒品(21.8%)和枪支(12.1%)案件位列其后之际,增加政府欺诈起诉及投入资源——诚然包括白领案件——无疑符合公众利益。此类案件甚至可能减少追查触碰反射池或向ICE特工投掷三明治者的资源。
但我们不应让特朗普政府在案件统计或反欺诈言论中逃脱责任,这些言论掩盖了党派议程,使最富有的欺诈者在逃避政府资金的同时,却将目标对准最贫困的税务欺诈者。
作者为哥伦比亚大学法学教授,曾任纽约南区美国联邦检察官办公室检察官
Tarah Wheeler

几周前,我在印第安纳州的公共部门发表了一场关于AI如何影响网络安全的演讲。演讲结束后,一位IT主管告诉我
他的老板正在向他施压,要求"让每个人都使用AI",同时他还在试图解决20年前的网络安全问题,比如员工使用个人设备处理业务。我给了他一些网络卫生建议——但事实是,新的AI增强攻击将使糟糕安全措施的后果变得更加严重。这位IT主管正在思考如何构建一个洲际导弹防御系统,而他的团队甚至连围栏的预算都没有。
AI发现的安全漏洞激增意味着网络攻击成本变得更低,而防御成本却更高。所谓"失控模型"的威胁也变得更加不可预测。OpenAI、Meta和Anthropic均报告称,其AI模型"突破了防护措施",能够发现远超其指令或用户意图的漏洞和利用手段。
我有过构建、运行、分析和对抗性测试生成式AI工具的经验,这些复杂机制快速创建廉价数字撬棍以入侵几乎任何系统的能力着实令人震惊。
过去,识别潜在漏洞、编写利用脚本并通过微小改动重复这一过程以绘制系统弱点需要专业知识和创造力。现在,这一过程可以在极短时间和极低成本内完成。其结果是形成了双层能力差距。公开
现有的AI订阅模式(如Claude)通常会设置防护措施,阻止用户请求生成攻击工具。但当用户在自有硬件上运行开放权重模型时,这些防护措施便形同虚设。
这意味着AI模型正将攻击工具交到那些从未经历过网络安全职业道德考验的人手中。据美国联邦调查局报告,2025年美国医疗行业共报告了642起勒索软件和数据泄露事件——多于其他任何关键基础设施领域。每起泄露的平均成本达740万美元,而因服务中断给受害者造成的无形损失尚无法估量。
今年的数字可能进一步上升。我认为,我们仍需等待两到三年,才能达到AI系统能够跟上软件漏洞修复需求的阶段。
然而,防范AI攻击并非政府优先事项。原本旨在协助美国州政府和地方政府的多州信息共享与分析中心(MS-ISAC)已于2025年9月失去联邦资金支持。美国网络安全与基础设施安全局(CISA)也被大幅削弱。
安全研究人员已不堪等待机构修复漏洞,开始主动披露。匿名研究者Nightmare Eclipse已公开多个影响微软系统的漏洞详情。
唯一希望在于公私合作。2026年4月,Anthropic启动了"Project Glasswing"计划,旨在协助发现并修复漏洞。然而,同年6月,Anthropic遵循美国行政部门一项存疑命令,暂停了对其最强大模型Fable和Mythos的访问。
公私合作需依赖稳定性与可信度。当Anthropic切断新模型访问时,Glasswing的稳定性已被削弱;而在未能在90天内发布漏洞报告时,其可信度也受到质疑。
我所采访的IT总监并不需要AI创新计划。他需要的是该国去年9月前仍拥有的共享网络防御体系。网络防御的无名英雄工作若做得好,便无人知晓;若做得不好,对人类健康、食品药品供应、交通运输乃至自由投票权的损害之大,甚至连最自信的AI也难以估量。
撰稿人为信息安全研究员兼TPO集团首席安全官
西蒙·特罗特 力拓集团首席执行官


Meta正在为青少年用户进行一些调整——乔希·埃德尔森 / 彭博社
几乎所有人——甚至Meta Platforms首席执行官马克·扎克伯格——都承认社交媒体可能对未成年人的心理健康构成严重威胁。Meta在周三宣布的18加元和解金,是该科技集团与美国各州和地区之间讨价还价的结果,将缓解伤害。但依赖相互妥协是保护年轻用户的一个有缺陷的方式。
在这种情况下,金钱的重要性不如听起来那么大。诚然,就单一公司和解金额而言,只有石油集团BP支付得更多,根据倡导组织"良好就业"的数据。对于市值1.5万亿加元的Meta而言,这只是九牛一毛,且分摊10年支付。若以15%的折现率计算分期付款,实际现值损失不到80亿加元——在历史上算不上前20大罚款。
不过,Meta确实在为Instagram和Facebook的青少年用户进行重大调整,包括禁用"极端化妆"滤镜,并添加屏幕使用时间提示。某些措施,如隐藏帖子上的"点赞"数量,应具相当效力。同样,在上课时间静音通知也是如此:智库"常识媒体"的一项研究显示,青少年平均每天收到237条通知。
但其他措施的力度不够。例如,两小时使用时间上限这一防止过度使用的关键措施,在获得家长同意后可被绕过。个性化推荐可被禁用,改为不那么操纵性的按时间线排序的信息流,但仅限用户或家长主动请求。很少有人会这样做。
此外,如果目标是保护儿童免受伤害,和解中的某些方面则违背逻辑。例如,Meta支付的5.3亿加元——以及更保守的用户时间限制——仅在竞争对手TikTok和YouTube同意实施类似限制并承担类似支付时才会生效。时间上限将在五年后到期,但成瘾的危险显然不会。
这些缺陷凸显和解的核心问题:它们基于双方能容忍的程度。Meta希望避免不光彩的法庭出现。州检察长们希望在合理时间内赢得胜利,并有强烈动机避免陷入可能拖延数年的反复上诉。
加利福尼亚州和纽约州等地仍在推动更严格的地方法律,其他诉讼仍悬而未决,但与英国和欧洲不同,美国近期几乎没有可能出台全国性监管。
这与华尔街形成鲜明对比——另一个如果放任自流会造成伤害的行业。同样,罚款也沦为企业运营成本的一部分。但资本和行为监管要求严格,并基于确保安全与稳健的分析制定,而非谈判拉锯。尽管经历了金融危机才达到这一步,但现行监管框架在过去近20年里基本运行良好。
社交媒体对儿童健康的负面影响正在酝酿一场危机。Meta的不完美和解显示还有多少工作要做,以及制定一致保障措施的重要性。如果硅谷确实对儿童、成年人、生态系统或选举制度构成风险,仅靠支付和妥协是无法解决问题的。
美国以超过5%的利率出售30年期国债,为数十年来首次。这对财政部长斯科特·贝森特而言并非好事。有人可能会认为,这对其新兴市场同行们更为不利。
从传统角度看,此言不无道理。以实际(即剔除通胀)计算,30年期国债收益率同样处于多年高位,约为3%。10年期实际收益率也接近2.5%。当美国国债等传统安全资产收益率走高时,通常会吸走新兴市场债券等风险资产的资本。
但这次情况不同。过去一年,持有新兴市场债券的表现并未如此糟糕。摩根大通指数显示,无论是以本币计价还是加元计价的新兴市场债券,在过去12个月内均上涨约8%至9%(以加元计),尽管伊朗战争冲击不断。加元也未因美国国债收益率走高而走强,这助推了表现。
新兴市场仍是相对有吸引力的投资目的地。自2023年以来,多国为吸引投资者纷纷推出更高的实际收益率,将政策利率维持在通胀水平之上。巴西10年期国债在剔除本地通胀后的收益率约为10%;南非则约为4%。
此外,新兴市场(至少从整体来看)通过修复财政赤字已变得相对风险更低。新兴市场基金管理公司九十一度将摩根大通本币指数中除中国外的国家整合为“新兴市场整体”,并指出这一经济诚信的综合体仅在支出(不含利息成本)上超出税收收入1%的GDP。
而且,美国高利率尚未压垮经济增长——至少目前如此——因此没有理由认为其自新兴市场的进口将下降。与此同时,根据美国国会预算办公室,美国今年预计将出现占GDP 2.6%的超支。
先锋领航是管理他人资金的佼佼者,胜利资本也有自己的雄心。近期两家公司的交易显示,即使股票市场处于历史高位,寻找新客户的压力仍在加剧。
以低成本指数基金闻名的私营先锋领航已同意收购Altruist,一家为财富管理师提供技术平台的公司,交易价格未披露,《华尔街日报》估计为40亿加元。总部位于得克萨斯州的胜利资本计划通过现金加股票交易接管第一鹰投资,此举将使其管理资产规模几近翻倍至6000亿加元。
两者均符合更广泛的行业趋势。尽管市场健康,资产管理公司的合并步伐却在加快,这本应表明单打独斗仍有丰厚利润可图。胜利资本曾试图竞购Janus Henderson,但该公司最终被纳尔逊·佩尔茨的特里安合伙公司收购。
诚然,部分管理公司的确显露颓势。以主动管理见长、管理资产达2万亿加元的T·罗威价格集团已连续21个季度录得资金流出,且预计未来两年内无法扭转局面。其股价在过去五年下跌50%。先锋领航正是问题之一,仅收取数个基点的费用即可跟踪标普500指数——主动管理者难以超越的基准。
随着客户要求——并获得——更低费用,这两笔最新交易展现了行业的应对之道。先锋领航正在接近财富管理师,帮助富裕及大众富裕客户配置资金的业务是金融服务业的亮点。拥有顾问使用的技术或许能持续吸引被动资金流向先锋领航。
对胜利资本而言,这更像是一场经典的整合举措,得益于快速上涨的股价。收购第一鹰预计每年节省2.8亿加元。若超出20%(该公司在过往交易中往往超出早期预测),胜利资本可能产生25亿加元的现值额外利润,覆盖逾三分之一的70亿加元收购价格。胜利资本表示,其在管理规模介于500亿至5000亿加元的基金中,有约150个潜在收购目标。
定价压力在交易公开证券的资产管理公司中最为严峻,因客户选择众多。但这一压力也将蔓延至私募市场。现在正是每家公司证明自身价值的时机。
1 最初需要许可才能分裂的细胞(6) 2 在护城河中挣扎(2,4) 3 吞下好啤酒后在赌场孤注一掷(10) 4 昔日肯特郡球员兼老法官?(5) 5 在舞台上挤奶的说唱歌手?(3,6) 6 见12 7 莫比乌斯带的部分描述(3-5) 8 皮匠或许紧张起来(8) 13 疯狂的狂热中夹杂着威尔士人出演的契诃夫戏剧(5,5) 15 利物浦歌手在为摇摆乐改写的旧乐队中?(9) 16 废物在冲水后被清除(8) 17 精英团体从下方审视绵羊(5,3) 19 作战规则?(3-3) 20 再次与捷豹车型正确配对的关键(6) 23 倾向于沿塞纳河岸绕行的路线(5) 24 在方形英里区骑马且嘴上叼着鸭子的鹦鹉(4)


2026年10月14日至16日 线上与线下 / 伦敦地标酒店 / #FTMining
Sheila Murray Chair of the Board
Duncan Wanblad Chief Executive Officer
Bernardo Fontaine Chair of the Board
Randy Smallwood Chair
Gustavo Pimenta Chief Executive Officer
FRIDAY 28 AUGUST 2026

The rogue clinics selling illegal stem cell cures BIG READ, PAGE 19
UK £3.70; Republic of Ireland €4.10
How rising Treasury yields are being misread STEPHEN MIRAN, PAGE 21
A policeman surveys the damage in the aftermath of the flash flood in Nepal that killed at least 389 people, according to the country's police. China has reported three deaths, with the two countries putting the number of those missing at more than 1,400.
Amid a huge rescue effort on both sides of the border, China warned of continuing risk. "Surrounding mountains could suffer landslides at any moment, and there is also a risk of secondary mudslides," said one official.
Nepal's Prime Minister Balendra Shah said: "With hope and faith we shall all face this disaster."
Scientists said that it was too early to establish the cause for the disaster but warned that such flash floods were becoming more frequent and severe in the Himalayas as the region warmed more quickly than the global average. Rising hazards page 6

Niranjan Shrestha/AP Photo
Serious mismanagement alleged • Papers sought from Kushner's firm • Fresh call for new leadership
SAMUEL AGINI — MONTE CARLO ROBERT ORR — LONDON
European football's governing body Uefa is preparing a criminal complaint against Gianni Infantino over the Fifa president's failed plan to sell a stake in the World Cup to private investors, it revealed yesterday.
In US court filings, Uefa said it was seeking to recover documents from Joshua Kushner, his investment firm Thrive Capital and Fifa's Americas arm, as it pressed ahead with efforts to oust Infantino from world football body.
Uefa was “preparing to bring criminal claims in Switzerland against Infantino and possibly other Fifa officials and advisers for criminal mismanagement”, the documents said.
Thrive Eternal, an investment vehicle of Thrive Capital, had been lined up as the lead investor in a commercial entity called Fifa Forward Enterprise.
Joshua Kushner, founder of both Thrive firms, is the brother of Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner.
Infantino's plan sought to raise \$4bn by selling a 20 per cent stake in Fifa's commercial rights. However, the implied \$20bn valuation of the proposed entity was "absurdly low", Uefa said in the filing seen by the FT. Thrive
and Fifa did not respond to requests for comment.
The legal move comes as Uefa seeks to maintain pressure on Infantino over the plan, which would have split Fifa's commercial activities from its role as football's governing body and rulemaker.
Uefa executives, European Fifa Council members and the region's football association bosses met in Monte Carlo yesterday to discuss their next moves.
In a statement, Uefa said attendees had given it backing to pursuing “every available institutional, political and legal avenue necessary to secure fundamental reform, restore proper limits on presidential authority and ensure that Fifa is once again governed as an institution – not around one individual”.
European football's governing body had threatened to boycott all competitions run by Fifa after Infantino's plan became public but confirmed yesterday that it would allow its teams to participate in the forthcoming Under-20 Women's World Cup in Poland.
Uefa said it had been assured by Fifa that the FFE project had been “irrevocably and permanently withdrawn” and that it “will not reappear in any other shape, construction, name or form”.
Infantino has acknowledged that the investment proposals, which he had pitched as a lucrative means to expand the game, had been mishandled and promised to conduct a review.
Uefa called for “a genuinely independent external review” as Fifa “cannot investigate itself and expect the football community simply to accept its conclusions". Infantino is seeking re-election in March and his detractors are yet to put forward a rival candidate. Uefa reiterated its call for new leadership and said it would work with its allies to identify a "credible alternative" if Infantino continued to seek another term.
Infantino's stake-sale plan had divided world football, with Uefa and its counterparts in the Americas and Caribbean rejecting the proposals while the Confederation of African Football and associations in South America and the Middle East offered their support.
Saudi Arabia, chosen by Fifa to host the 2034 World Cup, became the latest yesterday as it welcomed Infantino's commitment to dropping the sale and said his "contribution to growing the game worldwide should be recognised".
Washington berates allies over Europe's defence gaps The US has rebuked European allies whose military capability holes have been described as "a sea of red" in Nato's colour-coded assessments, as the White House weighs how quickly to withdraw troops from the continent.— PAGE 4
▶ Asylum claims fall a fifth Almost 86,000 people claimed asylum in the year ending in June, a fall of 21 per cent from the previous 12 months, as the number housed in hotels hit a new low in the second quarter.— PAGE 3
▶ London IPO hopes lifted Unique X, a cinema software group used by Disney and Warner Bros Discovery, is exploring an IPO in London at a valuation of £300mn, promising a boon for the struggling stock market.— PAGE 7
▶ PE payouts beat tax shift Carried interest payments to UK private equity dealmakers soared more than 50 per cent to £5.4bn in the run-up to big changes by HM Revenue & Customs last year to how the profits are taxed.— PAGE 7
▶ 'Neets' totals decline The number of young people not in education, employment or training in the UK has dipped below 1mn but remains at the second-highest level in almost 13 years at 981,000.— PAGE 2
Harvard looks abroad The elite US business school has explored teaching MBA students in Europe and Canada for the first time after Donald Trump's threat of withholding visas from its international students.— PAGE 6
Nvidia upgrades outlook The \$5tn tech giant has forecast a 70 per cent rise in sales next year as it tries to rebut criticisms that its investments and financing deals with customers amount to risky circular financing.— PAGE 8
Rifts widen in Gaza panel Israel is considering expelling British and potentially other European officials from the co-ordination centre for postwar Gaza in retaliation for criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu.— PAGE 6

As smoking declines, Big Tobacco has looked to the nicotine pouch for its engine of growth. The sachets placed between lip and gum are seen as less harmful than cigarettes but, as users acquire the habit, they build tolerance to weaker strains. Now, as makers fight for dominance of the \$5bn US market, higher-strength pouches have gained regulatory approval. Health experts are not in favour, warning a generation is being put 'at risk of life-long addiction'. Potent battle > PAGE 8
ASHLEY ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CORRESPONDENT
Mike Ashley yesterday attacked Andy Burnham's plans to revive the high street as “delusional”, warning that town centres would be “further devastated” unless taxes were cut.
The retail billionaire's broadside, contained in a letter to the prime minister and seen by the FT, came a day after Burnham sought to calm corporate nerves by saying that he wanted to "take pressure off" businesses.
The premier has made reviving the high street a key part of his pitch and has proposed funding business rates discounts for pubs and clubs by raising them on retailer-owned warehouses.
Ashley labelled that idea "simply delusional".
"Your comments about looking again at business rates in the next Budget are of course welcomed but frankly a case of too little, too late," he said in the letter, urging the prime minister to avoid jumping on "bandwagons that only address part of the problem".
Ashley, whose shops include Sports Direct, House of Fraser and Flannels, also rejected Burnham's proposal to give councils more powers to stop "dodgy" vape shops and adult gaming centres from opening.
"Shortsighted or populist reactions to underlying business challenges are not the answer," the billionaire wrote.
"You have the chance to make a difference, or get it horribly wrong . . . The hostile business climate can't be allowed to continue or the high streets will be further devastated."
He went on to endorse recent comments by Lord Stuart Rose, former boss of Marks and Spencer and a Conservative peer, who called Burnham's plans "a lot of bollocks about nothing".
Ashley has acquired a string of retailers out of administration. Most recently he bought luxury department store Harvey Nichols, saying he was saving "another great British retailer from financial oblivion" as he attacked the "dramatically increasing cost of employing people".
The tycoon has had a tense relationship with government. In 2016, he was grilled by MPs over the treatment of workers in Sports Direct's Shirebrook warehouse. He recently told the FT he had rebuffed a Reform UK donation request by saying he was “anti-politics”.
Ashley sent his letter to Downing Street yesterday, including an invitation to meet "as a matter of urgency". He said he had yet to receive a response.
www.ft.com/subscribenow Tel: 0800 028 1407
For the latest news go to www.ft.com
© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2026 No: 42,341 ★
Printed in London, Liverpool, Glasgow, Dublin, Frankfurt, Milan, Madrid, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul, Dubai

9" 770307 " 176159 "
STOCK MARKETS
| Aug 27 | Prev | %chg | |
| S&P 500 | 7737.99 | 7675.70 | 0.81 |
| Nasdaq Composite | 26424.25 | 26130.20 | 1.13 |
| Dow Jones Ind | 53676.08 | 53463.88 | 0.40 |
| Euro Stoxx 50 | 6424.73 | 6470.74 | -0.71 |
| FTSEurofirst 300 | 2602.39 | 2621.97 | -0.75 |
| FTSE 100 | 10792.54 | 10878.12 | -0.79 |
| FTSE All-Share | 5826.09 | 5866.59 | -0.69 |
| CAC 40 | 8319.87 | 8462.39 | -1.68 |
| Xetra Dax | 26367.24 | 26285.96 | 0.31 |
| Nikkei | 66131.98 | 66262.16 | -0.20 |
| Hang Seng | 25565.74 | 25652.97 | -0.34 |
| MSCI World | 4980.50 | 4982.50 | -0.04 |
| MSCI EM | 1716.80 | 1710.00 | 0.40 |
| MSCI ACWI | 1149.10 | 1148.90 | 0.02 |
CURRENCIES
World Markets
| Pair | Aug 27 | Prev | Pair | Aug 27 | Prev |
| $/£ | 1.165 | 1.165 | €/$ | 0.859 | 0.858 |
| $/£ | 1.358 | 1.359 | £/$ | 0.736 | 0.736 |
| £/£ | 0.857 | 0.858 | €/£ | 1.166 | 1.166 |
| ¥/$ | 159.320 | 159.370 | ¥/€ | 185.544 | 185.722 |
| ¥/£ | 216.396 | 216.568 | £ Index | 85.805 | 85.96 |
| Sfr/£ | 0.936 | 0.939 | Sfr/£ | 1.092 | 1.095 |
CRYPTO
| Aug 27 | Prev | %chg | |
| Bitcoin | 80383.50 | 78047.00 | 2.99 |
| Ethereum | 2522.87 | 2451.38 | 2.92 |
| Aug 27 | Prev | %chg | |
| Oil WTI | 80.88 | 80.85 | 0.04 |
| Oil Brent $ | 88.93 | 88.36 | 0.65 |
| Gold $ | 4610.02 | 4595.42 | 0.32 |
GOVERNMENT BONDS
| Yield (%) | Aug 27 | Prev | Chg |
| US 2 Yr | 4.20 | 4.22 | -0.02 |
| US 10 Yr | 4.65 | 4.66 | -0.01 |
| US 30 Yr | 5.18 | 5.19 | -0.01 |
| UK 2 Yr | 4.34 | 4.34 | 0.00 |
| UK 10 Yr | 5.03 | 5.03 | 0.00 |
| UK 30 Yr | 5.76 | 5.77 | -0.01 |
| JPN 2 Yr | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0.00 |
| JPN 10 Yr | 2.87 | 2.87 | 0.00 |
| JPN 30 Yr | 4.05 | 4.05 | 0.00 |
| GER 2 Yr | 2.85 | 2.83 | 0.02 |
| GER 10 Yr | 3.25 | 3.23 | 0.02 |
| GER 30 Yr | 3.75 | 3.73 | 0.02 |
Prices are latest for edition Data provided by ICE. www.ice.com
We help businesses create compelling propositions that build a better connection between you and your audiences.
To connect better, better connect with us. connect@heavenlygroup.com
HEAVENLY
heavenlygroup.com
NATIONAL
The OCR result should be empty, as the source image contains only a stylistic horizontal line that must be ignored according to Rule 2. No text or placeholder characters should be output.
Unemployment
Figure for young people out of work and education second-highest in 13 years
CHRIS SMYTH — PUBLIC POLICY EDITOR
The number of young people not in education, employment or training has dipped below 1mn but remains at the second-highest level in almost 13 years, as ministers prepare the ground for another push on welfare reform.
Between April and June, 981,000 people between the ages of 16 and 24 were so-called Neets, down from 1.01mn in the first three months of the year, according to official data yesterday.
Pat McFadden, who as work and pensions secretary has vowed to increase employment and training opportunities for young people, said the figures were "too high", came with a "terrible human cost" and "a big cost for the country".
A government-commissioned report by former cabinet minister Alan Milburn is expected to call for wholesale change of the benefits system to encourage young people into work, after a backlash from Labour MPs last year forced then prime minister Sir Keir Starmer to abandon efforts at reform.
Milburn said yesterday the Neets figure was “a scar on this country” and that Britain was “creating a lost generation”.
After an interim version was released in May, Milburn's full review had been pencilled in for publication next month. But it has now been pushed back to mid-October, as Prime Minister Andy Burnham seeks to avoid a row over welfare reform overshadowing his first Labour conference as party leader next month.
McFadden told the BBC yesterday that dealing with a recent rise in Neets should be “a cause not just for the government but for the country as a whole”,
and called for employers to do more. On Wednesday, McFadden, who served in the same role under Starmer, said there was a “design flaw” in the benefits system, hinting that people who were signed off sick would be expected to engage more in preparation for work.
The current system "too readily separates people into fit-for-work and unfit-for-work, and when they are unfit for work, it leaves them without any support or any conditions", he said. "I think that distinction is too black and white in the system as it stands."
Burnham's decision last month to keep McFadden despite a cull of other ministers loyal to Starmer was widely interpreted as a signal he wants to press ahead with welfare reform.
Neet rates peaked at 16.9 per cent in 2011 as unemployment rose following the global financial crisis before falling to 9.7 per cent in 2021. Since then, they have risen to 13 per cent, higher than the EU average. Ben Harrison, director of the Work Foundation, a think-tank, said the latest figures from the ONS indicated there were “no quick fixes to the youth employment crisis”.
"The number of young people out of education, employment or training may have dipped just below one million, but it would be a mistake to assume this is a turning point as it remains 30,000 higher than a year ago," he added.
While unemployment was behind previous peaks in Neet rates, long-term sickness has been a key driver of the recent increase. About 60 per cent of Neets have now never had a job.
Susannah Hardyman, chief executive of youth employment charity Impetus, said the cost to taxpayers of young people out of work would continue to grow without action. “We estimate that each young person who becomes Neet costs the state an average of £244,000 over their lifetime, through lost tax revenues and higher welfare, NHS and criminal justice costs,” she said.
Technology. Safety

Initiative inspired by victims of domestic abuse can monitor vital signs and alert authorities
LAURENCE FLETCHER — LONDON
A City of London hedge fund manager is developing a bracelet that uses AI to protect women and children seen as vulnerable to domestic abuse, an invention aimed at supporting overstretched social services.
Irene Perdomo, a trader for the past 14 years, has been co-funding the creation of an “SOS bracelet” that she hopes to give free of charge to the government or local authorities.
The bracelet, which is at the prototype stage, is designed to monitor the vital signs of children or women identified by social services as being at risk of abuse. It then records and transcribes interactions that might show wearers to be in danger and, if necessary, will alert authorities.
Perdomo's push to develop the bracelet, which she began working on five years ago, was triggered by reading details of the deaths of six-year-old Arthur Labinjo-Hughes in the UK and seven-year-old Adrian Jones in the US.
"The combination of the two — I ended up feeling very low," said Uruguay-born Perdomo, 49, who is developing the bracelet with a group of other City financiers. "I promised them [Labinjo-Hughes and Jones] that I was going to do this till my last breath."
Labinjo-Hughes was murdered during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 after being regularly beaten by his stepmother and father. They made him stand to attention alone in the hallway of their house for most of the day, while he was poisoned with so much salt that the sodium in his blood could not be measured by hospital equipment. At the time of his death, 130 bruises were found on his body.
Sentencing Labinjo-Hughes' stepmother and father, the judge described the case as "one of the most distressing and disturbing case[s] with which I have had to deal".
His stepmother, who was found guilty
Irene Perdomo displays the SOS bracelet she developed after reading about the death of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes, below Charlie Bibby/FT

of murder, and his father, who was found guilty of manslaughter and who had researched pressure points in an attempt to cause maximum pain, had "relished in making [Labinjo-Hughes] suffer", the judge added.
In the US, seven-year-old Adrian Jones was beaten and suffered extensive torture by his father and stepmother before eventually being starved to death in 2015 and fed to pigs. One detective on the case described it as the worst they had seen in their career.
A national review in 2022 into the murders of Labinjo-Hughes and Star Hobson, a 16-month-old who was also known to authorities before her death in 2020, found "faultlines" in child protection in England. "Multi-agency safeguarding arrangements" were "not yet fit for purpose everywhere" and there was "too much inconsistency and ambiguity in child protection practice", it added.
Perdomo's bracelet works by monitoring a person's body temperature, pulse, blood oxygen and blood pressure. If it spots abnormalities, an audio recording is triggered, which is analysed for content and emotion by AI for signs of possible threats faced by the wearer.
If it detects a potential threat, it will send the audio recording, along with a transcription and the wearer's location, to a child protection agency.
The wearer can press an SOS button to alert social services, while the bracelet can also be set to record at regular intervals. The device is designed to be tamper-proof and to send an alert if someone tries to remove it.
Perdomo, who is also a guest lecturer in mathematics and finance at Imperial College London, is in talks with two local councils in London about the potential use of the bracelets in domestic and non-domestic violence situations.
She has also been contacting politicians, social services and charities, while Imperial College's department of
'No one's going to make a penny from this . . . We don't want to do anything other than save lives'
computing has also agreed to do further data analysis on the bracelet.
David Gadd, professor of criminology at the University of Manchester, said technology could have a role to play in child protection. But he warned of risks, such as social services thinking that tagging a child meant their job was done and the stigma that a child could face at school from wearing such a bracelet.
"The unintended consequences will need to be well anticipated," he said.
The development of the bracelet comes amid a growing drive to harness recent, rapid advances in AI and wearable technology for social good or to protect the most vulnerable in society.
Precedents for wearable monitoring technology used in conjunction with a court order already exist.
The Scram continuous alcohol monitoring bracelet is worn around a person's ankle and will monitor their sweat every 30 minutes to check if they have been drinking alcohol.
It is used in the US, England and Wales, the Netherlands, New Zealand and Australia, for example as the result of a court order or voluntarily if a person wanting custody of a child needs to prove their sobriety.
It has a battery life of up to 90 days, and a trained team is able to provide testimony in court to support the readings if required.
Perdomo previously co-managed a hedge fund called Devet Capital, with Leonardo Marroni, who is also part of the team backing the development of the bracelet.
The bracelet's software was programmed in Uruguay by Aldo Mazza, who previously worked in IT for US health insurer Blue Cross Blue Shield, while the prototype has been built in China.
Issues remain, including the battery life, which is two and a half days, although Perdomo is confident that it can be increased to one week.
Perdomo declined to say how much she had invested so far in the bracelet, other than that she had put in a “significant amount” of money and time.
“No one’s going to make a penny from this,” she said of herself and other trustees. “In fact, we’ve put in money from our own pockets. We don’t want to do anything other than save lives.”
Digital security
KANA INAGAKI AND KIERAN SMITH
Data relating to 8.7mn customers was accessed following a cyber attack last weekend on three big airports, in one of the biggest breaches in the country in recent years.
Manchester Airports Group yesterday said customers' email addresses, phone numbers, vehicle registrations and postcodes had been taken following WiFi sign-ups and car park bookings at its Manchester, London Stansted and East Midlands airports. No bank or payment details were breached.
MAG, whose three airports were used by 66mn passengers last year, said it had “immediately contained the risk” after becoming aware of the hack on Tuesday. “At no point has passenger safety or aviation security been compromised,” it said.
The hack on the country's largest airport group follows several large cyber attacks on British companies, including Marks and Spencer, Jaguar Land Rover and the Co-op Group.
The vulnerability of important infrastructure was also highlighted by Sunday's revelation that hackers thought to
be affiliated with the Iranian regime had forced a small gas plant to go offline.
While the accessed customer information appeared restricted, the size of the MAG data breach involving 8.7mn customers is one of the biggest in recent years.
Rafe Pilling, director of threat intelligence at Sophos Counter Threat Unit, said attacks like this were “most often ransomware attacks, where cyber criminals exfiltrate data and make financial demands not to publish it”.
He added: “At this point, the responsible group is likely trying to negotiate with MAG and we would expect to see posting of indicators of the data they have taken over coming days if a ransom is not paid.”
MAG told the FT that it had not paid a ransom and declined to comment further. The National Cyber Security Centre said it was “working with Manchester Airports Group in response to a cyber incident”.
Richard Horne, head of the branch of signals intelligence agency GCHQ, warned last year that companies needed to do more to guard against cyber attacks.
In early 2023, retailer JD Sports said it had fallen victim to a cyber attack that exposed the data of 10mn customers.
Two years earlier, the Electoral Commission, the regulator, suffered a cyber incident in which the data of 40mn voters was accessed.
In 2020, retailer Dixons Carphone, now known as Currys, was fined £500,000 by the Information Commissioner's Office, the data watchdog, over a breach that compromised the personal data of more than 14mn consumers.
MAG said no operations were disrupted by the incident, adding: "Airport operations remain unaffected and customer parking services continue to operate normally."
MAKE A WISE INVESTMENT
Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday
Bracken House, 1 Friday Street, London EC4M 9BT.
Published by The Financial Times Limited, Bracken House, 1 Friday Street, London EC4M 9BT. Tel: 020 7873 3000
Editor Roula Khalaf
FT Customer Care Tel 0800 028 1407; help.ft.com Subscriptions www.ft.com/subscribenow Advertising Tel: 020 7873 4000; advertising@ft.com; commercial.ft.com

Executive appointments Tel: 020 7873 4909; www.exec-appointments.com
Letters to the editor letters.editor@ft.com■ 2018年1月1日
Printed by Newsprinters (Broxbourne) Limited, Hertfordshire,
Newsprinters (Knowsley) Limited, Merseyside, Newsprinters (Eurocentral) Glasgow, and Irish Times, Dublin, Ireland
© Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2026. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of the contents of this newspaper in any manner is not permitted without the publisher's prior consent.
'Financial Times' and 'FT' are registered trade marks of The Financial Times Limited.
The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice: www.ft.com/editorialcode
Reprints Are available of any FT article with your company logo or contact details inserted if required (minimum order 100 copies).
One-off copyright licences for reproduction of FT articles are also available.
For both services phone 020 7873 4816, or alternatively, email syndication@ft.com
The image contains only a stylistic horizontal line, which must be ignored according to Rule 2. No text or placeholder characters should be output.
Supreme Court
ALISTAIR GRAY AND JULIE STEINBERG
Flat owners fighting to replace expensive or unresponsive management companies in their blocks have won a case in the UK's highest court that strips freeholders of a powerful tool to derail resident-led takeovers.
The Supreme Court yesterday ruled in favour of a group of London leaseholders who were prevented from taking control of their building's management due to a minor technicality.
Property lawyers said the precedent-setting decision, which overturns an earlier judgment from the Court of Appeal, should facilitate other “right to manage” attempts by residents unhappy with how their blocks are run.
The case is part of a wider battleground over the feudal-era leasehold system, which affects most flats in England and Wales. It has been criticised for exposing flat owners to high service charges and shoddy repairs.
The right to manage, introduced in 2003, allows leaseholders to remove the freeholders' management company, but lawyers said the process could be costly and onerous for flat owners.
In the case before the Supreme Court, an attempt by leaseholders at Cresta Court in west London to seize management control was thwarted because they failed to send “invitation to participate” paperwork to one resident, who had recently purchased the flat.
Formal records of the property transfer were unavailable due to Land Registry backlogs. Even though the resident supported the takeover, the freeholder claimed the missed paperwork meant the entire process was legally void.
Its lawyers argued that residents seizing control of a building amounted to a forced transfer of property rights, so strict compliance was required.
Property tribunals heard the dispute initially and sided with the leaseholders, but the Court of Appeal last year agreed with the freeholder that the right to manage claim was invalid.
A panel of five Supreme Court judges yesterday overturned that decision, ruling that minor technicalities should not invalidate takeover attempts.

Winning 'right to manage' can be costly for leaseholders — Betty Laura Zapata/Bloomberg
"There is no reason to assume that the [right to manage] scheme was intended to provide for the draconian sanction of invalidity of the claim notice for every procedural breach," they said in a summary of the judgment.
Mark Foxcroft, partner at law firm Devonshires, said the Court of Appeal's decision had "created a powerful tool for landlords" to invalidate attempts to gain control of building management.
He said: "Technical challenges to right to manage claims by landlords, especially in larger blocks, have been on the rise. This clarity from the Supreme Court, without doubt, makes such challenges much less likely in the future."
Harry Scoffin, founder of campaign group Free Leaseholders, said: “The Supreme Court has delivered a victory for common sense by siding with captive leaseholders seeking to exercise their statutory right to manage so they can gain rightful control of their homes, money and lives.”
But he said there was more to be done, including lowering the threshold to 20 per cent for the proportion of residents needed to successfully mount a takeover.
Applications fall by a fifth in the year to June after small-boat arrivals decline by a quarter
AMY BORRETT AND DAVID SHEPPARD
The number of people claiming asylum in the UK fell by a fifth during Labour's second year in government, as the number housed in hotels hit a record low in the second quarter.
Almost 86,000 people claimed asylum in Britain in the year ending June 2026, a decline of 21 per cent from the previous 12 months, reflecting a drop of almost a quarter in small-boat arrivals via the English Channel.
Yesterday's figures from the Home Office come after ministers set out a series of immigration reforms last year to deter people from coming to the UK, including proposals to double the default amount of time required to qualify for permanent settlement and to toughen rules for refugees.
Immigration has surged up the political agenda in recent years, with voter concerns about small boat crossings boosting Nigel Farage's anti-immigration party Reform UK in opinion polls.
Andy Burnham, who succeeded Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister in July, has retained Shabana Mahmood as home secretary despite opposition from parts of Labour's left that oppose her push to tighten immigration.
While some reforms have come into effect, experts point to a wider decline in asylum seekers coming to Europe as a key driver for the decline in claims.
However, the government has made progress on its goal of closing asylum hotels by the end of this parliament, with 16,021 people housed in hotels at the end of the second quarter, an all-time low.
The figure marks a drop of 23 per cent from the end of the first quarter.
In the past 18 months a number of asylum hotels around the country have been the focus of anti-immigration protests, while Burnham has said wealthier areas should house more asylum seekers. More than 1,000 asylum seekers have been moved to inactive Ministry of Defence sites, including RAF Wethersfield in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. But the policy has often faced local opposition.
Yesterday's figures showed an annual decline of 8 per cent in the cost of the overall asylum system during the 2025-26 financial year to £4.4bn, a three-year low.
Mahmood said: "This government is restoring control at our border and fairness to the migration system.
“Small boats numbers are also now falling, but we are not complacent and there is more we must do. That is why I have boosted enforcement on the French beaches and overseas and introduced new legislation to tackle the pull factors that draw people here through unsafe and illegal routes.”
Madeleine Sumption, director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, said the figures reflected fewer people seeking asylum after arriving on a visa and through other unauthorised entry routes, not just fewer small boat arrivals.
"Recent policies may have contributed to the decline, including restrictions on universities whose students go on to claim asylum," she said.
“Other factors may also have played a role, such as fewer unauthorised arrivals into the EU and fewer Syrians coming to the UK following the regime change there.”
The data showed a 17 per cent rise in
NATIONAL

Citizenship applications in year ending June at a new high Citizenship applications, 12-month rolling total ('000)

Asylum seekers housed in hotels fall to record low People in receipt of asylum support housed in hotels ('000)
Source: Home Office
People board a boat off the coast of France seeking to cross the Channel in July; Shabana Mahmood, below — Gareth Fuller/PA; Bianca De Marchi/EPA/Shutterstock


the number of people applying for UK citizenship to 315,224 in the year ending June 2026, a record high.
Last year, the government set out plans to make it harder for migrants to obtain permanent settlement as part of what it called the “biggest overhaul of the migration model in 50 years”.
Nuni Jorgensen, researcher at the Migration Observatory, said the rise in citizenship applications partly reflected the growth in non-EU migration even before Brexit, as well as an increase in the share of non-EU migrants choosing to become citizens since 2021.
She said there had been a “particularly sharp” increase among EU citizens recently, suggesting a more sudden change in people’s desire to become British.
Almost 235,000 work visas were issued in the year ending June, a decline
'Recent policies may have contributed to the decline, including [curbs] on universities'

of one-fifth from a year earlier, reflecting the closure of a visa route for care workers and the introduction of tougher salary and English language requirements for skilled work visas.
The number of main applicants issued health and care worker visas declined by 65 per cent and skilled worker visas by 30 per cent.
The fall in skilled migrants risks compounding the pressures facing Burnham ahead of his government's first Budget on October 28. The Office for Budget Responsibility, the watchdog, is expected to update its forecasts at the fiscal event to reflect lower assumptions for future net migration.
Study visas granted to main applicants also declined, falling 12 per cent from the previous year, while the number issued to dependants remained stable.
Public finances
NIKOU ASGAR
Capital gains taxes brought in a record amount in 2024-25, according to data published yesterday, after thenchancellor Rachel Reeves' decision to increase the rate in her first Budget.
HM Revenue & Customs reported £24.2bn in capital gains tax receipts in the 2024-25 tax year, an 89 per cent increase compared with the year before and the highest annual capital gains receipts since 1987.
HMRC said 584,000 people paid CGT, a 45 per cent increase compared with the previous year, highlighting the impact of the Labour government's efforts to plug gaps in the public finances by raising the tax rate.
Reeves raised CGT rates in the 2024 Budget to between 18 and 32 per cent, up from the previous rates of between 10 and 28 per cent. The previous Conservative government cut the tax-free allowance in 2023-24 and then halved it to £3,000 a year from 2024-25.
HMRC said the CGT rate increase, consecutive yearly reductions in the tax-free allowance and increase in business asset disposal rates from April 2025 all contributed to record tax receipts.
CGT is levied on profits made when assets such as second homes, shares and businesses are sold. HMRC said £127bn in total gains was reported, an 82 per cent increase from the previous year.
For the first time, HMRC reported CGT receipts from crypto investors, with £1.38bn paid by 17,600 crypto holders, most aged between 35 and 44. Gains of at least £1mn each on crypto assets were reported by 240 people.
HMRC has been cracking down on crypto tax evasion and recovered more than £8mn from digital asset tax evaders, the FT reported last month.
HMRC said 45 per cent of CGT came from those who made gains of £5mn or more, a group representing less than 1 per cent of all CGT taxpayers.

INTERNATIONAL
Nato meeting
Colby calls for countries to 'step up' as assessment of capabilities a 'sea of red'
HENRY FOY — BRUSSELS
The US has rebuked European allies whose military capability gaps have been described as “a sea of red” in Nato’s colour-coded assessments, as the Trump administration weighs how quickly to withdraw American weapons and troops from the continent.
Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's policy chief, met Nato ambassadors in Brussels yesterday to discuss European defence investments in the context of a review of
US military deployments in Europe due to conclude in December. He told some European allies to move faster on buying critical conventional weapons systems that the US has long provided.
The US needed to see “major efforts to step up” from European allies and create “a Nato force model that’s going to put Europe in a lasting position where it’s going to be able to lead its own defence”, Colby said after the meeting.
"We hope to see more from countries like the UK," he said, while praising Germany, Poland and the Netherlands for their efforts to increase spending.
One Nato diplomat briefed on the discussions said Nato's national assessments, which mark specific required capabilities as green, amber or red, were "not pretty . . . there is a sea of red". Two others confirmed the talks covered capability shortfalls and demands on many allies to spend more.
European capitals remain uncertain about how the Pentagon review will be carried out. But officials fear Washington could use the findings to punish countries that do not deliver a clear surge in spending and capabilities when deciding which US weapons and troops to pull from Europe.
Some European allies pushed back in yesterday's closed-door meeting by pointing to areas where they meet or exceed Nato capability targets, according to the three people. The targets assess what countries are expected to contribute to an alliance response in a conflict.
Colby also raised a written questionnaire Washington had sent to Nato ambassadors. It asked whether their governments had restricted US use of military bases, whether they were buying weapons from American companies, and whether they had been “publicly supportive” of President Donald Trump’s foreign policy.
"We wanted to hear from allies directly, in writing," Colby added.
Trump has long criticised Nato allies for relying on US protection while failing to spend enough on their own defence. Colby's boss, defence secretary
Pete Hegseth, in June announced a six-month review of US forces in Europe aimed at ending what he described as "freeriding" by some Nato allies.
Trump has forced Nato leaders to agree to increase their defence spending baseline to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035, with 3.5 per cent spent on “core” elements such as weapons and troops. Five of the alliance’s 32 members are expected to meet those requirements this year, by Nato calculations.
Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, speaking ahead of the talks, said the process was important to ensure “a more honest and more equitable sharing” within the alliance – an initiative Hegseth and Colby dubbed “Nato 3.0”.
Latin America. Diplomacy

Leftwing Brazilian leader turns to US president amid escalating antipathy with secretary of state
GEOFF DYER AND MICHAEL POOLER BRASÍLIA AMY MACKINNON — WASHINGTON
The feud between President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and US secretary of state Marco Rubio has become so intense that Brazil's leader is seeking support from an unlikely source: US President Donald Trump.
As the South American nation gears up for a closely fought presidential election in October, Lula and Rubio have traded remarkably blunt barbs. Rubio accused Brazil's leftwing leader of putting "his own ego" ahead of his people, while Lula claimed the US's top diplomat was a "frustrated Latin American" who "hates Brazil".
Lula is trying to enlist the US president as an ally, saying this month he would call Trump to complain about interference in the election. "He [Rubio] does things that are different from what we had talked about with Trump," Lula said.
The two presidents then spoke last week for more than an hour in a call the Brazilian government described as “friendly and cordial” and in which they agreed on “the importance of maintaining strong commercial ties”. The statement made no mention of the election.
Some in Washington say Lula is manufacturing a fight with Rubio because he believes a nationalist backlash against the US will help him beat his rival, Flávio Bolsonaro, eldest son of the far-right former president. Lula is “openly instigating and prodding and inviting and provoking”, said a senior US official.
But for the Brazilian government, the dispute shows the state department has become more openly ideological in Trump's second term, placing greater emphasis on supporting rightwing allies in Latin America.
According to a senior Brazilian official, there is “an agenda of the Brazilian far right which is co-ordinated with the far right in the [US] state department”.
In the first Trump administration, diplomats from many countries would enlist the state department to talk the president down from his more radical suggestions. In Trump's second term, Brazil sees the president as a potentially
Inching closer: Donald Trump, centre left, accompanied by Marco Rubio, third from left, as he meets Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, centre right, on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit last October Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters
moderating influence, even though they recognise that he sets the policy's broad direction.
"Trump is the best of all of them [in the US government], he is the one who talks most seriously with me," Lula said last week. "We are both heads of state, two men in our eighties."
The US state department said it would respect “whatever government that the Brazilian people choose” and that it has had “very successful relationships” with previous administrations from both sides of the spectrum.
As South America's biggest economy and one of the continent's few leftwing governments, the stakes are high in Brazil's election. Brasília has been at loggerheads with Washington since last year when Trump imposed 50 per cent tariffs on Brazilian imports to the US – making it one of the countries most affected by the White House's trade policies.
Since then, Lula has had some success in building a personal rapport with the US president in spite of the trade tensions. "We had excellent chemistry," Trump said of a brief meeting with Lula on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly last year.
Brasília got a helping hand from its business community, especially Joesley Batista, one of the owners of JBS, the world's biggest meat producer – whose US poultry group Pilgrim's Pride was the biggest corporate donor to Trump's second-term inaugural committee.
After lobbying from Brazil and US companies with interests in the country, the administration ended up scaling back many of the tariffs.
Brazilian diplomats say the political tide shifted at the start of the Iran war, which they argue distracted the White House and gave more space for the state department to take the initiative. Since then, they claim, there have been attempts by the state department to favour the Bolsonaro family.
Brazil in March revoked the visa of Darren Beattie, a senior official at the state department, after discovering that
Lula 'has consistently taken radical leftwing positions that are opposed to the interests of the US' Marco Rubio
he planned to meet former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is under house arrest for having plotted a coup after losing the 2022 election.
When the US imposed a new round of 25 per cent tariffs on the nation in July, Rubio said Lula's policies "are bad for Americans and bad for Brazilians".
Last month, two other state department officials were denied entry after Brazil alleged they intended to cast doubt on the integrity of the electronic voting system – echoing unfounded claims aired by the Bolsonaros.
"It coincides with the statements from the [Bolsonaro] brothers, suggesting co-ordination to disseminate disinformation," said a Brazilian officials.
Some of the state department officials who have clashed with Brazil have also been involved in the combative approach the administration has at times adopted towards Europe.
Beattie, senior adviser for western hemisphere affairs, has met members of the far-right party Alternative for Germany, the Washington Post said. Samuel Samson, barred from travelling to Brazil last month, has sought to repurpose foreign aid grants to fund Maga-aligned groups in the UK and Europe.
The US official insisted the administration is not trying to interfere in Brazil's election. The planned visit by two state department officials to discuss electoral integrity was designed to have "perfectly routine conversations . . . the reaction from Brazil has been bizarre".
However, the state department has made no secret of its negative view of Lula's government.
In June, Rubio told Congress that Latin America was dominated by a "coalition of friendly countries" that worked closely with the US, but the exceptions were Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela – all authoritarian regimes – and, "of course, Brazil".
"He has consistently taken radical leftwing positions that are opposed to the interests of the US," Rubio said.
Matias Spektor, a foreign policy expert at the Fundação Getulio Vargas university, said the two nations were "bound to bump into each other" because Brazil was now much less dependent on the US economy — about a third of its exports go to China, compared with 11 per cent to the US.
"Would [the administration] prefer Bolsonaro to be president? Sure," he said. "But Marco Rubio is not going to sacrifice the relationship."
本报告期盈利承诺及业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间业绩预告期间
War funding
LAURA DUBOIS AND HENRY FOY BRUSSELS
EU countries including Sweden, the Netherlands, Spain and Poland are urging Brussels to renew efforts to leverage immobilised Russian sovereign assets to fund Ukraine's war effort, in response to fears that Kyiv faces a fresh funding crisis.
Plans to fund Ukraine using more than €200bn in Russian central bank assets held in the EU under sanctions collapsed last winter as Belgium, where the majority are held, blocked the initiative.
But a letter from a coalition of states to the European Commission sent yesterday called on the EU's executive to restart work on the concept, according to four people briefed on the document, and seek clarity on any progress in alternative legal and technical frameworks that could provide a solution to Belgium's veto.
"Now is the time to start a new discussion about how we can make further use of Russia's frozen assets for Ukraine's, and our, benefit," said Swedish foreign minister Maria Malmer Stenergard. "This is the fair and smart way to make sure that Ukraine can defend itself and all of Europe."
The letter states that “by using the immobilised assets, the EU can ensure that Russia pays for the destruction it has caused in Ukraine without delay, while at the same time reducing the burden on our own taxpayers.
“We therefore propose that the Commission’s technical experts are invited to explore . . . new options on how to use the immobilised assets for the benefit of Ukraine, which ensure that the risk rests with all EU member states and where no member state holds a disproportionate burden,” states the letter.
It calls for the topic to be discussed at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Ireland next week.
Ukraine has long demanded the EU use the Russian assets, frozen under sanctions, to help fund its defence. Profits arising from the assets stuck at Euroclear, the Brussels-based central securities depository that is holding the majority of the assets, are already being used to fund a loan of up to €50bn that was agreed in 2024.
As Kyiv suffers a nightly bombardment from Russian missiles, EU capitals worry that it requires additional financing beyond a €90bn loan that was hastily assembled in December. “The €90bn loan is a manifestation of the EU’s commitment to support Ukraine, but it is clearly not enough,” Stenergard said.
"We [need to] make sure it is not only one or two member states that bear the responsibility of this," said the person briefed on the document.
Belgium blocked the plan last year due to concerns that it would have to shoulder any repayment of the assets in case of legal challenges from Russia.
The seizure of Russian assets “would be illegal and would have legal consequences”, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said yesterday. “Russia will use the full range of legal means to defend its interests and to pursue legal action against those who made and implemented such decisions.”
Euroclear declined to comment. Additional reporting by Anastasia Stognei

- React to trusted global news everywhere you go, with ft.com and FT apps
Ratko Mladić Military commander 1942-2026

Ratko Mladić, the Bosnian Serb military commander convicted of genocide over the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, died yesterday in prison in the Netherlands at the age of 84.
Mladić spent 16 years on the run after the 1992-95 Bosnian war before being arrested in 2011 and transferred to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2017 after being found guilty of genocide, crimes against humanity and violations of the laws or customs of war.
Mladić's convictions confirmed his place among the most notorious war criminals of the late 20th century. He showed no remorse, denouncing the tribunal as "satanic" and once making a throat-slitting gesture at a Srebrenica survivor who had lost her husband, son and brothers as she came to testify.
The July 1995 slaughter at Srebrenica of more than 7,000 Bosniak, or Bosnian Muslim, men and boys was one of many atrocities in the Bosnian war, which killed about 100,000 people. It became a byword for international failure because the enclave was under UN protection. Neither the UN nor western governments took steps to stop it.
After Mladić's forces over-ran the enclave, he told a crowd of frightened, unarmed Bosniak civilians: "No one will be harmed. You have nothing to fear."
Men and teenage boys were then sep-
arated from women and murdered over several days. In footage filmed by Bos- nian Serb television, Mladić told his sold- iers it was time to take revenge for an Ottoman Turkish attack on Serbs in the area in the early 19th century.
Mladić was born on March 12 1942 in the Bosnian municipality of Kalinovik, then under the control of a Nazi-backed Croatian puppet state. He barely knew his father, a communist partisan killed fighting Croatian forces when Mladić was an infant. In the 1990s, Bosnian Serb forces ruthlessly cleansed Kalinovik of its Bosniak population. Many local Serbs regarded Mladić as a hero, and some helped protect him from capture after the war.
Mladić trained at the Yugoslav military academy in the 1960s and rose steadily through the Serb-dominated officer ranks. In 1991, as the Yugoslav state began to split apart, Mladić took charge of an army corps in Knin, capital of a breakaway Serb mini-state in Croatia. A year later, when the Bosnian war broke out, Mladić was appointed commander of the Bosnian Serb forces.
In this capacity he directed the siege of Sarajevo, in which more than 10,000 civilians were killed. The war crimes tribunal convicted him for his role in the siege, which lasted for almost four years, longer than the Nazi siege of Leningrad.
Mladić conducted his campaigns with Radovan Karadžić, Bosnian Serb political leader, and Slobodan Milošević, the Serbian president. Milošević died in custody in 2006 before the tribunal could pass a verdict on him. Karadžić was convicted in 2016 of war crimes and sentenced to 40 years in prison. He is serving that sentence in a British prison.
Mladić shared the view of extreme Serbian nationalists that Yugoslavia's break-up offered a chance to redraw the map. Bosniaks and Bosnian Croats were to be driven from big parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina using terror and intimidation. For some, the goal was a Greater Serbian state linking Serbia, including Kosovo, with Serb-controlled areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia.
Armed bodyguards protected Mladić during his time on the run, and he had help from sympathisers in the Serbian military and security services. He made occasional appearances at events such as his son Darko's wedding reception at a Belgrade hotel in 1997. His other child with his wife Bosiljka was Ana, a daughter who died by suicide in 1994 at the age of 23, using a gun owned by her father.
Serbian police arrested Mladić in May 2011 at a farmhouse north of Belgrade, finding him worn with age, in poor health and unrepentant. He told a hearing at The Hague: "I am General Ratko Mladić. The whole world knows who I am. I am here defending my country and people, not Ratko Mladić."
Tony Barber
INTERNATIONAL
LAURA DUBOIS — BRUSSELS
Four executives at the last major Russian bank still operating in Europe exploited the market chaos unleashed by EU sanctions in 2022 to make millions on their personal accounts.
As Moscow reeled from western sanctions imposed to help defend Ukraine, many of state energy giant Gazprom's foreign currency bonds became stuck in Europe and their price plummeted. To support Russian investors and borrowers, President Vladimir Putin decreed that the bonds could be replaced by new ones at full price in Russia.
The most senior bankers at Gazprombank's outpost in Luxembourg spotted an opportunity. They received millions of euros in personal loans from their employer and embarked on a spending spree, buying up the cut-price bonds and exchanging them for full-value equivalents in roubles, according to documents seen by the FT.
They made more than 50 transactions that could have netted profits in excess of €9mn, according to FT calculations based on the documents.
Gazprombank Luxembourg is the main conduit for European countries' payments to Gazprom, which founded the bank but is a separate company.
The trades have raised questions about whether the four bankers may have circumvented EU sanctions and used insider information, according to lawyers, financial experts and EU officials consulted by the FT.
The bond swaps involved a key Russian entity under EU sanctions, the National Settlement Depository, according to Gazprom's announcements. "It sounds like circumvention" of sanctions, said one EU official presented with the findings who was not authorised to speak publicly. "This needs to be subject to a criminal investigation in Luxembourg."
The four directors regularly co-ordinated, buying the same amount of the same bond on the same day, often before they were announced as eligible
for replacement on Gazprom's website. People familiar with the trades say it was not widely known which bonds would be up for swaps and when, as Gazprom gave very little notice and short windows of about two weeks to make the swaps.
The findings put fresh scrutiny on Luxembourg's light-touch financial regulation. Its regulators inspected the trades following a tip-off but only told the bank to update its employee handbook, according to an audit report.
Gazprombank Luxembourg denied wrongdoing, telling the FT it “strictly” complied with the “laws, rules and regulations both of the EU and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg”. The bank “was never involved in violation of the EU sanctions neither in general nor in relation to the alleged transactions that were conducted by those individuals in their personal capacity”, it said.
Dmitry Derkatch, Gazprombank Luxembourg's former director who initiated the trades, also strongly denies wrongdoing and said the regulator "found no material irregularities".
Gazprom, which used to supply gas to large swaths of Europe, was spared from the sweeping EU sanctions launched against Russia after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
But the price of its foreign currency bonds nonetheless plunged, with some trading at half their initial value, as western sanctions on key nodes of Russia's financial system made it difficult for Gazprom to send interest payments to creditors.
The bonds became de facto stranded.
Internal communications at Gazprombank Luxembourg show issues quickly arose with settling Russian securities trades. “There is quite high likelihood that the settlement [of trades] will not occur and the funds/securities will be blocked,” states an internal email from March.
The Kremlin's fix was to let investors replace their European bonds with new ones in Russia, tradeable in roubles at their original value. Demand for these bonds was high and the price gap was "real and substantial", said Alexandra Prokopenko of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.
Western financial players were highly suspicious. “This whole environment created, indeed, opportunities for abuse,” said one person familiar with Clearstream, the Luxembourg-based central securities depository that settles bond trades.
The programme caught the eye of Derkatch, who travelled to Moscow in June 2022. On his return, he opened a private account with Gazprombank Luxembourg – even though the bank's internal policy was not to offer personal accounts to employees – and received a personal loan from Gazprombank's Moscow office.
Putin launched the swap programme in a decree signed on July 5 and, nine days later, Derkatch began buying Gazprom bonds.
He started by paying about €65,000 for a bond due in 2024 – less than half its nominal price of €150,000, according to documents seen by the FT. The bond was replaced in December, potentially earning Derkatch a profit of about €85,000 if he sold it at full price on the Russian market.
When Derkatch bought the bond, Gazprom had not publicly detailed which securities would be swapped or when – it did not announce a replacement for Derkatch's bond on its website until November.
The first swap round – for a different bond to the one bought by Derkatch – was announced on its site in September, and Gazprom said it would announce plans for other foreign currency bonds outside Russia going forward.
The “risk of uncertainty” in buying the bonds so soon after Putin’s decree was “great”, particularly for someone taking out a loan for the transactions and paying interest, said Sergey Aleksashenko, former deputy chair of Russia’s central bank and head of economics at the Nest Centre in London.
The timing of Derkatch's purchase suggested that “maybe . . . he was aware or he had some connections with the top management in Moscow who confirmed that [a specific bond] will be part of the transaction”, Aleksashenko said.
Derkatch told the FT that “the absence of any material findings by the Luxembourg banking regulator following a very detailed inquiry . . . shall conclusively settle that there was nothing unlawful in connection with this matter”.
He said he could not comment further because he did not have access to the bank's "detailed internal information".
In September, the other three members of the Luxembourg outpost's management board also began buying the discounted bonds: Sergey Nekrasov, Sergey Belousov and Pavel Bolshakov.
The four directors appeared to be “hunting the market” for the right bonds, which were difficult to find, said one person familiar with the trades. While they did not participate in every replacement round in 2022, they bought four specific bonds that were all replaced by the end of the year. The purchases were often made shortly before Gazprom announced on its website that the bond in question would be replaced.
For example, the four managers bought a dollar-denominated bond beginning in late September and through October. Its replacement was announced on the Gazprom website on October 7, and the swap window ended on October 24. The bond had been trading at about 50 per cent in Europe, but its Russian replacement rose to 120 per cent in December.
It would have been “impossible” to do the transactions in a short amount of time without prior knowledge of which bonds would be swapped, suggested one person. “You have to find these bonds, they are illiquid, and you have to understand which bank or broker has such bonds,” they said.
It is unclear how much money the four borrowed from Gazprombank Moscow to fund the transactions. But between July and November the four bankers received transfers of more than

Gazprom chief Alexei Miller and President Vladimir Putin — Kirill Morozov(AFP)Getty
Gazprom's bonds were trading at full price after being replaced in Russia
€17mn converted from roubles, which they used for dozens of purchases, according to documents seen by the FT.
Their combined potential profit was more than €9mn, according to FT calculations based on how much they paid, the bonds' nominal prices and historical exchange rates.
Senior bankers at Gazprombank Luxembourg were aware of the arrangement. In an email to the head of compliance that October, private banking head Dmitry Galkin outlined how the four "received separate personal loans . . . and bought different Eurobonds of Gazprom". He noted their "economic rationale": the price of the rouble replacements "theoretically should be higher" than that of the bonds in Europe.
Gazprom's original 8.625% bond in \$ vs its Russian replacement trading in roubles*
They used Swiss bank Compagnie Bancaire Helvétique as a broker and also routed funds through Cypriot bank Veles International.
Belousov, Bolshakov and Nekrasov were approached for comment by email, and Belousov and Bolshakov were also approached via the website of the company they run together. Gazprom, Gazprombank Moscow, CBH and Veles did not respond to requests for comment.

Gazprom Series 2 8.625% due on Apr 28 2034 (XS0191754729) and its replacement Gazprom 8.63% due on Apr 28 2034 (RU000A105A95)
Source: Cbonds
Gazprombank Luxembourg denied having “been engaged in market abuse or otherwise participated in any unlawful conduct”.
The transactions were halted inside the bank following an inquiry at the end of 2022, according to two people familiar with the trades.
Following a tip-off, Luxembourg's financial regulator CSSF inspected the bank in March 2023. But it did not interview some of the people who had information about the transactions, according to two people familiar with the trades. "The CSSF was . . . blind," said another person.
The CSSF found the bank violated its internal rules that did not allow employees to open personal accounts and found that the four directors had not been vetted despite being deemed "high risk", according to an inspection report seen by the FT. But it did not find any other wrongdoing or impose fines.
The CSSF declined to comment.
Luxembourg's finance ministry, which is responsible for enforcing sanctions, declined to comment.

HTSI autumn beauty special

Indiana state of mind Is the Midwest tiring of Trump's politics?

Can Netflix remake Jersey Shore — and its property market?

James Rebanks on the future of UK farming

Lunch with the FT: former IMF deputy Gita Gopinath
INTERNATIONAL
Middle East
Prospect of ousting from US-led hub comes after criticism of Netanyahu
NERI ZILBER — TEL AVIV JIM PICKARD — LONDON AMY KAZMIN — ROME
Israel is considering expelling British and potentially other European officials from the US-led co-ordination centre for postwar Gaza in retaliation for criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu's policies in the Palestinian territories.
Several people familiar with the matter said the Israeli government had in recent weeks discussed ejecting the UK from the International Gaza Support
Center, the multinational headquarters established to monitor the US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Similar measures had also been considered against Italy and Germany, some of the people said.
The IGSC is based in southern Israel and led by US military who work with Israel Defense Forces and military and diplomatic officials from some 50 countries and international organisations.
Israel this week announced the expulsion of Dutch representatives from the centre because of the Netherlands' boycott of Israeli products from settlements in the occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
Israel also this year expelled Spanish representatives from the IGSC, citing Madrid's "obsessive anti-Israel bias".
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has aimed to toughen the UK's approach towards Israel, saying last month he would seek to put pressure on the Israeli government through a potential ban on trade in goods from settlements.
The UK, Germany and Italy, with nearly 20 other countries and the European Commission, also issued a joint letter last week condemning Israel's plan to move ahead with construction tenders for the E-1 settlement project near Jerusalem, which analysts warn could bisect the West Bank and prove fatal to prospects for a Palestinian state.
UK foreign secretary Ed Miliband added that “Britain will not stand back and accept the destruction of the two-state solution”. Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa’ar replied that the UK should not “lecture the Jewish people about where they may live in their historic homeland”.
According to two people familiar with the matter, any move to expel additional international representatives from the IGSC could require approval from the US-led Board of Peace, the international body set up by Donald Trump this year to oversee Gaza's post-war transition and reconstruction.
But a third person disputed the need for approval and said Israel had the full sovereign right to decide who entered and stayed in its territory. A spokesperson for the Board of Peace said: "We continue to engage our Israeli counterparts on ways to maintain and strengthen multilateral co-ordination and to accelerate progress on the president's comprehensive peace plan for Gaza."
The Israeli prime minister's office and German officials declined to comment.
British officials are sanguine about the prospect of being pushed out of the IGSC. One figure familiar with the situation said Israel had already made an example of Spain and the Netherlands, and so it was logical to expect “payback” for Britain’s hardening stance. Additional reporting by Andrew England in London; Anne-Sylvaine Chassany in Berlin
Himalayas. Climate change
Buildings were swept away as the flood burst river banks near the Nepal-China border


Source: Planet Labs
Suspected glacial collapse highlights risks as area heats faster than the global average
MICHAEL STOTT — NEW DELHI JOE LEAHY IN — BEIJING ANDRES SCHIPANI — KATHMANDU
The giant flash flood that tore through settlements near Nepal's border with China on Wednesday came as a brutal reminder of the growing risks to people in the Himalayas, a mountain range scientists say is deeply vulnerable to climate change.
It is too early to establish definitively what caused the flood, but scientists said satellite imagery before and after the disaster suggested a large portion of cliff north of the Langtang Lirung mountain close to Tibet collapsed, snapping off a chunk of glacier sitting over it.
The force of tens of millions of cubic metres of falling rock and ice was initially mistaken for an earthquake and, by some estimates, unleashed enough energy to melt the glacial ice, sending an enormous wall of rock, mud and water cascading dozens of miles down the Bhote Koshi valley into Nepal.
The calamity highlighted the dangers posed by glaciers and mountain slopes increasingly affected by climate change in an area scientists say is warming more quickly than the global average and where some worry that vast Chinese hydroelectric projects could be adding to the risk of disaster.
More than 360 people have been confirmed killed by Wednesday's flood, with more than 1,400 missing as of last night.
Kristen Cook, a geomorphologist at the University of Grenoble, said analysis yesterday of fresh satellite images suggested that a large section of cliff under the glacier at Langtang Lirung had collapsed.
While rock avalanches were not unusual in the high Himalayas, “the unusual thing about this event, and why it was such a disaster, is that it’s extremely large”, she said.
"The lower part of the hanging terminus of the glacier seems to have fallen off and cascaded about 1,300 metres into the valley below," said Simon Cook, an environmental scientist at the UK's University of Dundee.
Simon Allen, a disaster risk researcher at the University of Zurich,
The extent of the damage wrought by the flash flood and mudslide can be seen from satellite images of an area near the border of Nepal and China, with the Rasuwagadhi dam and the town of Timure hit
said it was clear from satellite images that "a large mass of rock and ice had failed" and fallen as an "ice-rock avalanche" that caused the flood.
Allen said researchers in the Glacier and Permafrost Hazards in Mountains working group had not yet worked out the size of the fall, but based on the seismic signature, they calculated that 50mn-100mn cubic metres of debris would have hit the ground.
"It's massive," he said. "It's bigger than any event of this type that we've seen in the region, at least in historical times."
Giri Lal Budhathoki, 38, a truck driver who lives downstream in Nepal's Rasuwa district, said: "What I saw looked like a hurricane of water; our house was lifted several metres into the air and then collapsed."
Budhathoki, who narrowly survived the flood and was flown to a Kathmandu hospital with head and arm injuries, said he was readying himself to mourn his wife and four children, who were still unaccounted for.
The US Geological Survey initially reported a 4.4 magnitude earthquake in an area close to the border between Nepal and China, but later revised this to a 5.2 magnitude landslide, saying the seismic energy was “generated by a glacial collapse and debris flow”.
Anil Kulkarni, a glacier expert at the Indian Institute of Science in Bengaluru, said glaciers in the Himalayas were retreating "very fast".
“Because now the Himalayan region is warming . . . at a much higher rate than the global mean, the permafrost between the ice mass and the rock has started to weaken,” Kulkarni said.
A similar though smaller disaster occurred in Rishi Ganga valley in India in 2021, he added, when a large mass of rock, snow and ice fell from a mountain into a valley, causing the deaths of more than 200 people.
Kulkarni said the 2021 disaster had underlined to the scientific community just how destructive a glacier fall could be. "And remember, there will be thousands of such hanging glaciers in the mountains. So it is really tricky to know how to handle it," he said.
The World Bank and Asian Development Bank have warned that Nepal's varied topography and social vulnerability make the country particularly susceptible to geological and climate-related disasters and to floods caused by glacier lake outbursts or heavy rain.
“Climate change is already having significant impacts on the environment in Nepal . . . glaciers are melting, and the frequency of precipitation extremes is increasing,” they said in a 2021 report.
Kulkarni said that hydroelectric dam construction and increasing development in the Himalayas were increasing the vulnerability of countries in the region to glacier collapses. Resulting big surges of water can burst dams and expose growing river valley populations to flooding.
"We are experiencing disasters on a scale and of a nature which we never experienced in the past," he said.
Cook at Dundee university said early warning systems could help, but spotting glaciers that might collapse was like "looking for a needle in a haystack".
"They look like any other glaciers quite often and it's quite difficult to predict which ones are dangerous," he said.
Some experts are concerned about China's extensive dam-building programme in Tibet, particularly its plans for what will be the world's biggest hydroelectric scheme on Yarlung Tsangpo, which flows into India where it is known as the Brahmaputra.
Premier Li Qiang, China's second-ranked leader – who was dispatched by President Xi Jinping yesterday to oversee relief work in the Gyirong area that was hit hard by this week's flood – attended a groundbreaking ceremony for the dam scheme in south-eastern Tibet last year.
Chinese officials have dismissed concerns about the mega-dam's environmental impact or potential effect on downstream supplies of water.
The complex plan for the mega-dam involves harnessing a 2,000-metre drop over 50km in a bend in the Yarlung Tsangpo by diverting the water through tunnels – an undertaking expected to create huge amounts of debris and that will involve drilling through complex geological formations.
“Human-induced infrastructural development can also contribute to seismic risks,” said Jagannath Panda, head of the Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs.
Panda said the new mega-dam, “in terms of both its volume and scale”, had the potential to contribute to greater seismic risks, potentially increasing the chance of landslides.
“This is certainly one project that China should review carefully, with much greater transparency, disclosure and dialogue with Himalayan countries, particularly India, Nepal and others,” Panda said. “Hopefully, this disaster will create the necessary awareness in China about the importance of discussing these issues more openly with India and other lower-riparian countries.”
表决结果的票数、提案编码和投票结果的乘积规则得到被征集到投票结果的重复投票,如果在收到投票结果时,需将被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到投票结果的被征集到股东拥有的投票权。
South Asia
MICHAEL STOTT — ISLAMABAD
Pakistan is focused on securing US financing as it plots a return to global capital markets, its finance minister has said, in a major shift after years of relying on state loans from China.
Muhammad Aurangzeb told the FT that the \$10bn swap line that Pakistan sought from Washington last month was intended to serve as “a confidence signal” to private investors, as Islamabad’s military-backed government looks to capitalise on close ties to the Trump administration and accelerate international borrowing.
He added that he saw a “very important role” for the Export-Import Bank of the United States (ExIm Bank) and the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), which he said had shown “risk appetite for Pakistan”.
"It's a combination of engagement with the US primarily to focus on trade and investment flows, and to help signalling with respect to international capital markets," he said.
Aurangzeb said Islamabad had received “constructive engagement” from Washington over the \$10bn swap line and hoped to receive an answer “in the next couple of months”.
Cash-strapped Pakistan has reduced fiscal deficits, brought down inflation and rebuilt reserves under a \$7bn, three-year IMF programme approved in 2024. But GDP growth, estimated by Islamabad at 3.7 per cent for the 2025-26 fiscal year, remains insufficient to meet the needs of its fast-growing population and poverty levels have risen.
Aurangzeb said the government wanted to stimulate exports to break perennial balance of payments crises. Pakistan's trade deficit widened to a four-year high of \$39.5bn in the year to June, and exports fell.
"If you look at our last episode where we put the foot on the pedal by pumping liquidity, going for consumption-led growth . . . we get into trouble very quickly because we are an import-dependent economy," he said. "So we're keeping a very close eye on that . . . [on] more export-led growth."
A former executive at Citibank and JPMorgan who has also run Pakistan's Habib Bank, Aurangzeb is keen to shift Pakistan's economy "from aid to trade and investment". He said ExIm Bank could finance sales of Boeing aircraft to the newly privatised Pakistan International Airlines and help US companies to upgrade Pakistan's oil refineries, while DFC could take equity stakes in Pakistani conglomerates.
Pakistan's armed forces chief and de facto leader Field Marshal Asim Munir has also forged a close personal bond with US President Donald Trump and helped facilitate peace talks with Iran — a link that Washington believes it can leverage to tilt Islamabad away from Beijing's orbit.
China is by far Pakistan's largest creditor, holding 23 per cent of its \$129.7bn in total outstanding foreign debt as of 2024, according to World Bank figures in December. Although Aurangzeb insisted the choice between the US and China was “not an and-or discussion”, he confirmed Pakistan was not seeking additional financing from China.
Additional reporting by Humza Jilani in Islamabad
Visa threats
ANDREW JACK — LONDON
Harvard Business School explored teaching MBA students in Europe and Canada for the first time after US President Donald Trump's administration last year threatened to stop international students getting visas to attend its courses.
The elite US business school held talks last year with potential partners, including Nova School of Business and Economics in Portugal, IMD in Switzerland, London Business School and the University of Toronto, according to people familiar with the discussions.
The talks underscore the pressure on Harvard, which has been embroiled in a battle with the White House over its efforts to exert greater political control over federal grants. The administration has pushed to overhaul its governance, cut its funding and impose penalties for alleged failure to tackle antisemitism and restrict freedom of speech.
Harvard Business School confirmed that talks about foreign operations took place a year ago "when we were exploring options outside the US for international students due to the uncertain visa situation. Fortunately, that never came to pass and there are no further explorations under way."
However, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, a member of the university's governing corporation, said this month that Harvard more broadly was "leaning into further exploring having some out-
posts abroad". Speaking on a podcast hosted by David Deming, dean of the undergraduate Harvard College, Cuéllar said Harvard was "fundamentally an American institution, but it is also a university with a global role and global relationships".
Trump's efforts to prevent the university from sponsoring visas for its international students have been rebuffed by the courts for now.
David Bach, president of Lausannebased IMD, confirmed that preliminary discussions took place last year about his institution hosting a first-year MBA cohort taught by Harvard faculty, with a possible IMD contribution, after the threat to international student visas.
Other US universities have established campuses and partnerships abroad, including Chicago Booth School of Business. Harvard has experimented with short courses for executives abroad, but hosting its two-year MBA outside the US would break with its tradition of in-person MBA teaching exclusively at its Boston campus. It charges tuition of \$170,000 for its MBA.
International student recruitment to US universities has fallen in the past two years, as immigration and employment restrictions and the broader political environment have deterred applicants.
Harvard University has won a legal stay on some of the actions the Trump administration sought to impose but suffered a drop in some federal grants and experienced broader government pressure on the country's higher education sector to impose greater political scrutiny.
Eastern Europe
RAPHAEL MINDER — WARSAW
The head of the Polish Olympic Committee has been detained as part of a fraud investigation into a collapsed cryptocurrency platform with links to the country's rightwing opposition.
Radosław Piesiewicz, president of the committee, was arrested yesterday in an investigation into alleged bribes linked to a sponsorship deal with Zondacrypto, which stopped trading in April after losing investors at least 350mn zlotys (€81mn), according to investigators.
Piesiewicz is the first prominent arrest in the scandal, which has also reverberated through the country's politics after Zondacrypto – which reported having 1.3mn registered users before its collapse – funded rightwing events, foundations and media.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk has sought to connect the company with organised crime and Russia as well as the opposition Law and Justice party (PiS), which led Poland until 2023 and still controls the presidency.
After Zondacrypto's collapse, investigators examined whether it had misled investors before beginning bankruptcy proceedings. They have since turned their sights on personal gifts that Piesiewicz allegedly received from the beleaguered company, including a luxury Swiss watch worth €40,000, according to the justice minister. Piesiewicz has denied wrongdoing.
In the run-up to last year's presidential election, won by the rightwing PiS candidate Karol Nawrocki, Zondacrypto sponsored Poland's first gathering of the Conservative Political Action

Detained: Polish Olympic Committee president Radosław Piesiewicz
Conference, or CPAC. At the conference, Nawrocki was endorsed by US President Donald Trump's then homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem.
Since then, Tusk has also been at loggerheads with Nawrocki, who has blocked dozens of government bills, including legislation intended to regulate Poland's cryptocurrency market.
In the wake of Zondacrypto's collapse, Tusk has drawn attention to its history of sponsoring events organised by PiS and giving money to foundations run by PiS politicians, including former justice minister Zbigniew Ziobro. Last month, Tusk's government asked the US to extradite Ziobro to stand trial on several separate Polish fraud charges.
The company has also provided advertising funding to TV Republika, Poland's most popular rightwing news channel. That funding is under investigation but the channel's owner, Tomasz Sakiewicz, has denied wrongdoing.
Jakub Rutnicki, Poland's sports minister, welcomed the arrest. "Such a person should never have been the president" of the Polish Olympic Committee, Rutnicki wrote on X.
Model collapse Bitcoin treasury groups lose \$80bn in value as crypto hoarders sell tokens and revert to former activities ✪ PAGE 11
ORTENCA ALIAJ — LONDON
Jes Staley told US lawmakers he did not connect Jeffrey Epstein's large cash withdrawals from his JPMorgan Chase account with his sex offences, saying it was "incredible" to him that the financier continued to abuse minors after he was released from prison.
"You know, you can go to jail for . . . a year and you've been convicted of abusing minors, it's just incredible to me that he would continue to do it after he got out of jail," Staley told lawmakers, according to a transcript released by the US House committee on Wednesday.
Staley, a senior former JPMorgan executive who later went on to become chief executive of Barclays, appeared in
front of members of Congress late last month to answer questions about his ties to Epstein in a voluntary closed-door interview.
During his questioning, Staley admitted that he had personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein's accounts after he began serving his sentence for soliciting underage sex in 2008.
The bank had removed almost all other banking relationships with Epstein and "it seemed to me, closing a checking account is a tough move", he told lawmakers.
Staley said he was unaware the accounts were used to facilitate sex trafficking by Epstein, who was found dead in his jail cell in 2019 as he awaited trial.
Epstein routinely withdrew tens of thousands of dollars in cash from the account, sums that would ultimately amount to \$5mn, raising red flags within JPMorgan even before his first conviction.
The questioning covered familiar ground, including emails in which the two men discussed Disney princesses Snow White and Beauty from Beauty and the Beast. Staley again said he did not recall what the emails were about, though he later said he may have come across a young woman in a Snow White costume.
Melanie Stansbury, a Democratic congresswoman from New Mexico, highlighted inconsistencies in what Staley was able to recall.
"You're claiming that you can remember this interaction you had with Mr Epstein when you went and made a friendly visit while he was doing his sentence, but you have no recollection of these emails and exchanges you had over a woman that was referenced as 'Snow White' years later?" she asked him. "That's ridiculous," she said.
Staley said many of the exchanges scrutinised by the committee happened a long time ago and he was not able to recall many of the details.
Staley has maintained he had a “close professional relationship” with Epstein, a characterisation that came under scrutiny in his failed attempt to overturn a lifetime ban from working in financial services imposed on him by UK regulators during a trial in London last year.
Asked by lawmakers why Staley had chosen to remain friends with Epstein even after his 2008 conviction, the former Barclays boss said: "It's inconceivable to me that he would have continued, and I thought he had paid his fine. He had gone to jail. My expectation was he would have reformed himself."
JPMorgan declined to comment. A lawyer for Staley did not respond to a request for comment.

Cinema chains including Vue use the company's software to manage film showings — Mike Kemp/In Pictures/Getty Images
NIKOU ASGARI AND IVAN LEVINGTON LONDON
A cinema software company whose technology is used by Disney and Warner Bros Discovery is exploring an IPO in London in a potential boon for the UK market.
Manchester-based Unique X is considering listing in the capital next year at a valuation of £300mn, according to people familiar with the matter.
Cinema chains including Odeon, Vue and Cineplex use the group's software to manage film showings and schedule trailers, while studios such as Warner Bros Discovery, Disney and Universal use its technology to distribute their films to cinemas globally.
A new tech company listing would be a much-needed bright spot for the London market, which has suffered from lacklustre IPO volumes in recent years despite several reforms.
UK politicians and policymakers are urgently trying to encourage businesses to list in London and investors to support them.
The government has sought to incentivise listings by making regulatory changes, including providing a stamp duty holiday for new IPOs and lowering free-float requirements to allow company founders to keep more of their stakes.
Downing Street last month asked private equity bosses why they were not floating their portfolio companies in the UK, the FT reported, in a sign of the government's concern about the situation.
Just seven companies listed in the UK in the first half of this year, raising £577mn. In the first half of last year, nine companies listed in London, raising £183mn in total.
Meanwhile, a record number of British companies are being acquired by overseas buyers, underscoring strong investor demand for what they consider to be undervalued businesses.
Unique X was founded in Norway in 1997 and has grown to deliver more than 1.1bn cinema advertising spots and software to over 40,000 cinema screens across the world.
European investment firm Kartesia invested \$80mn in the company in 2024 at an undisclosed valuation. The company's founder Chris Hagan retained 85 per cent ownership of the business, Unique X said at the time.
Unique X would raise £100mn through a London listing, one of the people said, at a roughly £300mn valuation, adding that “probably 60 per cent of the films you’ve seen” use its technology in some capacity.
The company is also exploring other options such as a sale, while timings could change, they cautioned.
Unique X did not respond to requests for comment. Kartesia declined to comment.
ALEXANDRA HEAL
Carried interest payments to UK private equity dealmakers soared more than 50 per cent to £5.4bn ahead of big changes last year to how the profits were taxed.
Data from HM Revenue & Customs shows almost 4,000 buyout executives shared in the industry's biggest pool of carried interest since the tax authority started collecting the data in 2017.
Dealmakers received the carried interest payments – their share of profits on successful deals – in the 2024-25 tax year. Changes to the carried interest tax regime took effect from the start of the 2025-26 tax year.
The data suggests a flurry of activity to sell companies and crystallise carried interest payments in 2024.
The Labour Party won power in July 2024 on a manifesto that pledged to close a “loophole” in the way carried interest was taxed.
In October that year, then-chancellor Rachel Reeves announced she would increase the tax rate from 28 per cent to 32 per cent in April 2025 and to 34 per cent from April 2026 – changes more modest than the industry had feared.
Just 230 dealmakers shared £3.5bn in carried interest between them, suggesting that a handful of funds crystallised the vast majority of the profit shares.
That figure was in line with what the entire UK industry generated in the previous tax year. Only a fifth of the people who received carried interest in the 2024-25 tax year were women.
Private equity firms typically receive 20 per cent of the total profits after the return on investments they make crosses a minimum hurdle, with the rest of the profits going to their backers such as pension funds.
In the US, carried interest tends to be paid out on a deal-by-deal basis. Deal-makers receive carried interest when an individual investment made by a private equity fund clears the hurdle.
One top private equity tax lawyer said buyout firms had crystallised a lot of carried interest by selling companies to other funds that they also manage, a recent phenomenon in an otherwise difficult exit environment.
Those gains were reported for tax purposes even though executives tended to roll them into the new funds to retain alignment with the new investors. "People did accelerate [exits] so they could pay a lower rate," he added.
BUSINESS INSIGHT TECHNOLOGY Richard Waters

T
here are plenty of unresolved questions about what part today's leading software products will play if AI reshapes working life
as profoundly as many in the tech world expect. But at least the worst of the indiscriminate selling of software stocks — a bloodbath known as the SaaS-pocalypse — appears finally to have run its course.
The latest sign of the relief rally was yesterday's 20 per cent share price jump that greeted Salesforce's quarterly earnings report, extending the rebound since the stock hit a low point in June to around 65 per cent.
Chief executive Marc Benioff has been declaring the SaaS-pocalypse over almost from the moment it started. He was at it again this week, this time apparently with more justification, though his company's shares are still a third below their late-2024 peak.
Software investors could also take heart from comments by Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic. The company's release of AI tools aimed at replacing some traditional software products triggered the worst of the sell-off.
"We are not interested in destroying anyone," Amodei declared in an interview on CNBC about a partnership with Salesforce — apparent evidence that a new period of "co-opetition" has set in.
The broad rebound in software stocks over the past two months shows that Wall Street has at least set aside some of its worst fears. One was that customers would start to drop their current vendors and use AI to vibe-code their own software. This always seemed a stretch.
Another realisation is that some software companies are less prone to immediate disruption from AI than others. That is particularly true if they hold data that represents the "ground truth" about what is happening inside a company – making them so-called systems of record – and if they are closely tied into a company's workflows.
For general purpose tools without a tight link to essential operations, on the other hand, the SaaS-pocalypse is still in full swing. That includes companies like Airtable, a once-hot maker of produc-
tivity software that has just been sold for around a fifth of its peak value, and Medallia, a generic customer survey tool that recently left private equity owner Thoma
Bravo nursing a \$5bn loss.
But even if the threat to more entrenched software products seems less immediate than it did, the longer-term challenge remains. If AI agents start to take over some of the work done by humans, they will not need the kind of software in wide use today.
The result is what is known as “headless” software — products stripped of the user interfaces that until now have governed how they are used, allowing AI agents to access the data they contain directly. Salesforce declared it would go headless in April, while companies like Workday and SAP have followed with partial moves of their own.
For companies that have always charged based on the number of people who use their software, this presents an obvious business model risk. But an even bigger problem may be that much of their value to users has come from the UI: the forms, dashboards, analysis tools and other features that determine how work is carried out and managed.
Once AI agents skip the UI to tap into the data directly, much of that functionality will be delivered in new ways that have little to do with the old, human-centric software.
This risks turning today's essential software into tomorrow's back-end databases – necessary, perhaps, but no longer the sort of technology that commands a premium.
Efforts to resist this are only just taking shape. For software companies, it means expanding the system of record function to turn themselves into essential authorities that control how data is accessed and used. Another is to expand from simply maintaining records to prompting actions, marshalling agents to control how work is done.
For Anthropic and OpenAI, meanwhile, moving further up into the application area as they look to embed themselves more deeply into their customers' operations has become a priority, particularly as they try to outrun the threat of commoditisation in their core AI models. Co-opting the distribution of a company like Salesforce is one way to accelerate that, but it doesn't resolve the inherent competition.
To judge from Wall Street's reaction, investors are at least finally willing to give some software companies the benefit of the doubt. There is still much to be fought out before the final shape of AI-enabled work becomes clear.
richard.waters@ft.com
Contracts & Tenders
| REC POWER DEVELOPMENT AND CONSULTANCY LIMITED(A wholly owned subsidiary of REC Ltd.) | ||||
| GLOBAL INVITATION (Through e-bidding Only) | ||||
| FOR SELECTION OF TRANSMISSION SERVICE PROVIDER THROUGH TARIF BASED COMPETITIVE BIDDING (TBCR) PROCESS ON BUILD, OWN, OPERATE AND TRANSFER (BOOT) BASIS FOR 01 (ONE) INTRA - STATE TRANSMISSION PROJECT | ||||
| REC Power Development and Consultancy Limited, New Delhi, India (a wholly owned subsidiary of REC Limited, a Maharashtra Central Public Sector Underlying), invites proposal for settling up of the below mentioned transmission of the RFP. One offer and Transfer and (BOOT) basis following single stage two envelope process of "Request for Proposal (RFP)". Interested employers refer to the Request for Proposal (RFP) notifications and RFP documents available on our websites www.recpcd.in & www.recinidia.in.c.in | ||||
| The bidders may obtain the RFP documents on working days between 1300 hours (IST) to 1600 hours (IST) from 25.08.2020 to one day prior to bid submission date-on payment of non-refundable fee lists: 5.00.0001 (Rules Five Third Only) or USD 700 (US$ 40,000 in Ten Thousand Only) or USD 900 (US$ 40,000 in Ten Thousand Only) or USD 1,000 (US$ 40,000 in Ten Thousand Only) | ||||
| The Request for Proposal (RFP) documents can also be downloaded from our websites www.recpcd.in & www.recinidia.in.c.in, however, in such cases where the request should be submitted Response to RFP documents on the above mentioned transmission of non-refundable fee lists: $0.00.0001 (Rules Five Third Only) or USD 700 (US$ 40,000 in Ten Thousand Only) = 18% GST as per detail provided in the RFP document. The Report & clarifications to RFP documents shall be issued to those bidders, who have obtained/purchased RFP documents by paying requise fee. The record timelines in the register are as follows: | ||||
| Sr. No. | Name of Project | Last Date for seeking clarifications | Last Date for submission of Response to RFP | Details of Opening of Response to RFP |
| 1. | Construction of 765 kV & 400 kV lines associated with the RFP document, including PRIPs and PRIPs in the RFP document available on the website www.recpcd.in & www.recinidia.in.c.in. | 14.09.2026 | 27.10.2026 up to 1000 hrs (IST) | 27.10.2026 at 2000 hrs (IST) |
| All corrigands, addenda, amendments, time extensions, etc.: the RFP will be hosted on our websites www.recpcd.in & www.recinidia.in.c.in. Bidders should regularly visit our websites to keep them following updates. Note: REC/PCDC reserves the right to cancel or modify the process without assigning any reason and without any liability. This is not an offer. | ||||
| Bid Process Coordinator | An Initiative of | Chief Executive Officer | ||
| REC Power Development | Government of U.S. Federal Government | Core-4, SCYPE Complex, 7, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003, India | ||
| REC Power Development and Consultancy Limited | UP Power Transmission | |||
| U.S. Federal Government | Gross amount of total revenue | Total revenue | ||

COMPANIES & MARKETS
Technology
Chip group rebuts criticism of 'circular financing' as it beats analyst expectations
MICHAEL ACTON — SAN FRANCISCO
Nvidia boosted its forecast for AI chip sales next year as the \$5tn tech giant tried to rebut criticisms that its raft of investments and financing deals with customers amounted to risky circular financing.
The world's most valuable company late on Wednesday reported revenues of \$96.2bn for the quarter to the end of last month and projected sales of about \$108bn for the current quarter, beating Wall Street expectations.
Chief financial officer Colette Kress said Nvidia expected strong growth to continue, forecasting a 70 per cent rise in sales next year. She said customer demand was set to double but revenue would be limited by supply constraints.
The projection, along with the announcement that Amazon Web Services had agreed to start deploying an additional 2mn of Nvidia's latest GPUs this quarter, pushed the shares up more than 8 per cent in afternoon trading in New York yesterday.
The robust earnings report comes as the chip group faces greater investor scrutiny over how it has deployed its vast balance sheet to help its customers fund their building of AI infrastructure.
This month, Nvidia agreed to provide partial guarantees to a consortium of Wall Street investors that will provide \$500bn in chip financing for its clients, and signed up to a more than \$100bn backstop for an OpenAI data centre in Ohio. These come on top of investments in many of its biggest customers and revenue-sharing and backstop deals tied to its chips.
"We recognise the scale of this support and we know some will call this circular financing. We see it differently," Kress told analysts. She said these investments "will be excellent" with "limited" risks because of strong demand for computing power.
Ahead of Wednesday's earnings, Morgan Stanley analysts called for a "high degree of transparency" around these deals, which critics said involved Nvidia propping up demand for its products and left it exposed if usage of AI disappointed exuberant expectations, causing an oversupply of its hardware.
The chips group is a major investor in OpenAI and Anthropic, and Kress said demand from AI labs that Nvidia is leveraging its “balance sheet” to support would contribute roughly a quarter of its business next year.
Nvidia's financial performance has become a bellwether for the health of the AI infrastructure boom because its advanced semiconductors are widely used to train and run models.
Melissa Otto, head of research at Visible Alpha, said the guidance of 70 per cent growth next year was a "very significant beat of expectations", which were around 45 per cent.
Data centre revenue, linked to the core AI chip business that has powered much of Nvidia's growth, was \$89bn last quarter, up 117 per cent year on year.
Chief executive Jensen Huang emphasised the increasing number of companies beyond OpenAI that were contributing to demand for AI infrastructure. "This time last year, one lab alone was driving the build-out; today, we have a golden age of new AI labs and start-ups."
Huang defended the use of Nvidia's balance sheet to help its customers afford more hardware. He said this generation of AI and data centre players "will be some of the most consequential technology companies in history".
Tobacco. New products

Small but rapidly growing segment has gained greater acceptance from regulator
STEPHANIE STACEY — LONDON
Big Tobacco is pushing into higher-strength nicotine pouches in the US as part of an “intensifying” battle for dominance in a fast-growing \$5bn market.
Most pouches in the US have historically had between 3mg and 6mg of the addictive stimulant, but sales of more potent versions are “growing much faster than the broader category” and now account for 17 per cent of volumes, according to Stifel’s analyst Matt Smith.
The trend towards stronger versions of the pouches – small sachets placed between the lip and gum to deliver nicotine into the bloodstream – received a boost last week when the US Food and Drug Administration cleared an 11mg variant of Philip Morris International's Zyn Ultra. It is the highest-strength product authorised by the US regulator.
Three months earlier, the FDA changed its enforcement strategy to allow some new pouches to stay on the market while awaiting scientific reviews and formal authorisation. That has enabled manufacturers to speed up the introduction of new versions and flavours of the products, which regulators increasingly regard as a less harmful alternative to smoking cigarettes.
Big Tobacco's move to higher-strength pouches comes as companies — looking for new profit drivers — are in a race for a bigger share of the fast-growing market as smoking has fallen in rich countries. Demand for more potent pouches has also risen as users have built up tolerance to weaker versions.
“Typically, the more you consume these products the more your tolerance goes up and you’re going to want some higher-strength pouches,” said Gerald Pascarelli, an analyst at investment bank Needham.
Philip Morris International started selling its 9mg and 11mg Zyn Ultra pouches in the US in June. British American Tobacco plans to launch its new Velo Max, available in 8mg and 12mg, by the end of next month, when rival Altria is planning a national expansion for its 12mg On! Plus pouches.
Almost 21bn nicotine pouches, valued at about \$5.2bn, were sold in the US last year, more than half of sales worldwide, according to research company Euro-monitor.
Sales of smokeless nicotine products, including pouches, grew more than
BAT's marketing strategy for its Velo brand includes a partnership with the McLaren Formula 1 team. The pouches, below, are already sold at greater strengths in the UK — Daniel Ballarin/Alamy; Mike Kemp/In Pictures/Getty Images
8 per cent in the first half of this year, while US cigarette sales dropped 2.4 per cent, according to figures compiled by NielsenIQ and Goldman Sachs.
Cigarettes made up almost 70 per cent of all nicotine products sold, but Big Tobacco regards nicotine pouches as a potential engine for growth, with BAT, Philip Morris and Altria planning to accelerate investments in the US this year. That would add to an environment of “intensifying competition” in the nicotine pouch sector as consumers pushed into higher-strength and more “moist” variants of the product, said Pallav Mittal, analyst at Barclays.
Nicotine pouches were invented in the early 2000s by a group of Swedish scientists inspired by snus, which has been popular in Scandinavia for centuries. Their innovation was to swap the powdered tobacco leaf — a known carcinogen — in snus for synthetic nicotine.

Zyn, which Philip Morris acquired in 2022 when it bought Stockholm-based Swedish Match, was the first brand to enter the US mainstream. It has recently lost market share to rivals, including BAT's Velo Plus, which was introduced to the US market in 2024 as a softer and higher-moisture format, with a higher maximum strength of 9mg.
Philip Morris in June began the US introduction of Zyn Ultra, which is higher strength but priced at a discount to the lower-strength standard version.
Last month, the company's chief financial officer, Emmanuel Babeau, said the new product would win back market share by addressing "competitive gaps in the growing higher-strength segments".
Philip Morris had previously blamed slow approvals from the FDA for keeping it out of the “most dynamic strength and flavour segments”.
Following industry lobbying, the US regulator last September launched a pilot programme to accelerate the review and approval of new nicotine products. The FDA said the move was
'Typically, the more you consume these products the more your tolerance goes up'
part of a push to promote strategies to reduce harm to smokers, though critics including the World Health Organization have warned that nicotine pouches and “a trend to increasing maximal nicotine strength” were placing a new generation “at risk of life-long addiction”.
A change in the US regulator's attitude had driven a "big wave of innovation" in the sector, said Jefferies analyst Andrei Andon-Ionita.
BAT chief executive Tadeu Marroco said it was important to provide “different levels of strength to address different forms of business” but that there were “so many nuances in the market”, including flavour, that would enable even its lower-strength products to increase market share.
Big Tobacco sells higher-strength nicotine pouches in Europe, where products have not had to face the FDA's product-by-product authorisation process. Zyn and Velo are available in strengths of up to 16.5mg and 17mg per pouch respectively in the UK.
Marroco said growth in the US would come “not just from more people using the category, but also starting to use more of the product” as consumers increasingly behaved like Europeans, who typically consume about twice as many pouches a day.
根据《证券时报》及更新的《中国证券报》和《上海证券报》的规定,披露了《中国证券报》、《证券时报》和《上海证券报》、《证券日报》和巨潮资讯网(www.cninfo.com.cn)的财务数据。我们相信,我们获取的信息真实、准确、完整,没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏,并对其内容的真实性、准确性、完整性承担个别及连带责任。
Technology
SONG JUNG-A — SEOUL
A Singapore-based activist fund has offered to take over a Samsung affiliate, arguing its shares are undervalued, in the first big test of South Korea's new shareholder protection rules.
Flashlight Capital Partners sent a letter to five Samsung Group units yesterday, offering to buy their combined 20.6 per cent stake in S-1 Corporation, South Korea's largest security services provider, for Won906.6bn (\$655mn).
The offer, which would give Flashlight control over management of the company, is the first takeover bid for a Samsung affiliate by an activist investor and represents a 45 per cent premium to Wednesday's closing price.
Shares of S-1 rose 7 per cent after the offer was reported yesterday.
Sanghyun Lee, managing partner of Flashlight, said his fund was emboldened by South Korea's new Commercial Act, which was revised in July last year to impose a legal duty on company directors to consider the interests of all shareholders.
Before the change, corporate governance advocates said boards typically prioritised the interests of the ruling families behind chaebol, the family-run conglomerates that dominate South Korea's economy. "The answers from
the five boards will show whether the directors work for their shareholders," said Lee.
The five boards include those of battery maker Samsung SDI, Samsung Life Insurance, Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance, brokerage Samsung Securities and credit card provider Samsung Card.
The offer follows a letter the fund sent to S-1's board in June urging the company to improve its corporate governance and boost its share price, which has fallen by nearly a third over the past decade.
Lee said that the board had issued an “incredibly hollow” response. “I was dumbfounded when they admitted the board ‘had never tried to analyse its own fair share price’,” he said.
He noted that S-1 controlled half of South Korea's market for security services but its stock was trading at a "steep discount" — about four times its annual operating profit, compared with 12 times for second-ranked SK Shieldus and 10.6 times for global peers.
“That is not a business problem — it is a governance problem,” Flashlight said in June, adding that every S-1 chief executive over the past 25 years had come from Samsung Group and had no professional experience in security services.
S-1 denied there were governance issues, pointing to its bench of independent directors, and said the company was “deeply committed to enhancing the share price and shareholder value”. It added that it had paid a dividend of Won3,200 (\$2.30) a share this year and maintained a payout ratio in the 60 per cent range, well above the market average.
Flashlight said that it would "keep all options open" until it heard from each of the five Samsung boards.
Financial services
ELLA LEE — WASHINGTON SUJEET INDAP — NEW YORK
KKR has agreed to pay \$250mn to settle the US Department of Justice's lawsuit alleging the private equity firm repeatedly failed properly to file documents with the federal government related to buyouts between 2021 and 2022.
The penalty is the largest imposed over violations of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, the federal law that requires acquirers to provide financial information of merger parties to regulators including the Federal Trade Commission and the justice department before closing deals.
The sum was more than 20 times any previous penalty imposed under the Act, said associate attorney-general Stanley Woodward.
KKR said it strongly disagreed with the lawsuit's claims after the agreement was announced on Wednesday. "We believe that our firm acted in good faith at all times under our prior filing process, and it was consistent with industry practice. However, we determined that ongoing litigation would be a significant distraction for our organisation, and we are pleased to put this behind us," it said.
KKR said the civil penalty would have no financial impact on the firm or any investors and would be fully reimbursed by external law firms.
The US sued KKR in January last year in one of the final efforts by the DoJ's antitrust unit under former president Joe Biden to crack down on what it regarded as anti-competitive private equity dealmaking just days before Donald Trump took office.
Prosecutors alleged that KKR altered documents, failed to submit filings or “systematically” omitted required documents across at least 16 transactions between 2021 and 2022.
The lawsuit followed earlier settlement discussions between the Biden DoJ and KKR that failed. The private equity firm then countersued the department.
"The sole purpose of the antitrust division's threatened actions is to make an example of KKR and thereby chill merger and acquisition activity," the firm wrote in its January 2025 complaint.
The DoJ said that KKR was required to make more than 100 pre-merger filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act since 2021 and was “familiar” with its requirements.
Federal authorities had occasionally targeted Wall Street investors over HSR violations, enforcement activity that included two different small settlements the US government struck with Dan Loeb's hedge fund Third Point over stakes the firm had taken in Yahoo and DowDuPont.
KKR co-founder Henry Kravis is a longtime donor to Republican politicians and had donated \$1mn to the Trump inauguration in 2017.
Technology
RYAN MCMORROW — SAN FRANCISCO
Anthropic has struck a deal with UK cloud computing start-up Nscale to rent capacity from its flagship data centre in West Virginia in an agreement worth roughly \$45bn over six years.
The tie-up adds to a web of deals for processing power the AI lab has rapidly woven together as it races to keep pace with surging demand ahead of an initial public offering planned for this autumn.
Anthropic will begin accessing 460 megawatts of Nvidia's next-generation Vera Rubin processors at the facility when the chips come online late next year, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The company has signed computing agreements with Amazon and SpaceX and has raised tens of billions of dollars this year to fund infrastructure. It has also held talks with Meta about renting its computing power in what could be a multibillion-dollar deal.
The maker of the Claude chatbot has separately committed to lease more than \$150bn of Google's AI chips, housed in data centres built for them.
Anthropic's latest deal highlights how, despite spending tens of billions of dollars on AI infrastructure, the company is still scrambling to secure enough computing power.
Processing power: the tie-up adds to a web of deals Anthropic has agreed to boost its AI infrastructure

Nscale, which is also preparing an IPO that could come as soon as next month, raised \$2bn in March at a \$14.6bn valuation in a round led by Norwegian energy group Aker and 8090 Industries, with backing from Nvidia, Dell and Nokia, among others.
Former UK deputy prime minister
Nick Clegg and Sheryl Sandberg, the former Meta executive, are members of the group's board.
The company is working to build a 1.35GW data centre in Mason County, West Virginia, with a 2GW natural gas power plant on site to supply the facility, which Nscale has estimated will cost \$69bn. It also has a data centre campus in Norway under way that is expected to be used by OpenAI, among its more than a dozen data centre projects.
Like many AI data centre projects, the 2,250-acre development in West Virginia has drawn pushback from locals concerned about noise and other impacts from construction.
Nscale this month published a report prepared by EY on the economic benefits of the project. The consultants estimated the data centre would bring 2,090 jobs and \$395mn in annual GDP contributions to Mason County.
Bloomberg first reported the Nscale-Anthropic deal.
COMPANIES & MARKETS
Hong Kong case will test if global umbrella body can be held liable for audit failings of national firms

ELLESHEVA KISSIN — LONDON STEPHEN FOLEY — NEW YORK ARJUN NEIL ALIM — HONG KONG
The liquidators of China Evergrande have won the right to take an \$8.5bn negligence claim against PwC beyond the Big Four firm's Hong Kong and mainland Chinese arms to the organisation that sits at the centre of its global network.
The case may lay bare one of the central tensions in the Big Four's traditional business model: they sell the benefits of a global group while operating through legally separate national firms.
Evergrande, which was one of China's largest property developers, defaulted in 2021 with about \$300bn in liabilities. It was later found to have fraudulently inflated revenue before its collapse.
Multiple regulators have found that PwC auditors in Hong Kong and mainland China failed to meet professional standards when they signed off on Evergrande's financial statements. The probes have already cost the PwC firms in Hong Kong and China millions in fines from regulators.
Evergrande had no contract with PwC International, but the liquidators are trying to establish that the global entity nevertheless took enough responsibility for setting, monitoring and enforcing audit standards to be liable for failures.
A Hong Kong judge on Wednesday found that it was “at least arguable” that the global organisation owed Evergrande a duty of care and ordered the case to proceed to the next stage – a blow to PwC International, which had sought to have the claim thrown out.
PwC is not one giant global partnership. Big Four accounting firms use a network structure for separate local firms, which keeps national audit firms legally separate.
They are co-ordinated by a global umbrella organisation called PwC International, a private company registered in England and Wales, which maintains the brand, sets strategy and imposes common standards. It also runs a quality assurance programme to ensure the network firms operate in a way that is consistent with those standards.
The separation is deliberate and legally significant. Each member firm is liable for its own business and cannot bind PwC International or another member firm.
It is designed to comply with differing national audit regulations and to shield each member firm from the legal liability and reputational damage that can spill across jurisdictions after audit failures or consulting disasters.
The system has existed since the late 19th century. Its importance was thrown into sharp relief by the collapse of Arthur Andersen in 2002 following the Enron scandal. Andersen, Enron's auditor, operated under a more integrated "one firm" model, allowing the legal fallout in its US business to snowball, resulting in the failure of the global business.
PwC International had asked the court to strike out the liquidators' claim on the grounds that it had never contracted with, communicated with or been paid by Evergrande.
The only immediate consequence is disclosure. The Hong Kong judge, Patrick Fung, said that internal documents were “crucial” to determining the
An abandoned Evergrande project, above, in Fuyang City, mainland China; a judge in Hong Kong, below, has ruled the case against PwC can be taken beyond the national firms to PwC International CN-STR/AFPGetty Images; Paul Yeung/Bloomberg
true relationship. That could give the liquidators access to network rules, audit-quality procedures and communications between PwC International and the Hong Kong and Chinese firms.
While it has not confirmed whether it intends to appeal against the judge's ruling, a spokesperson for PwC's global network said that it was "evaluating our legal options".
The real value of the decision may be leverage: disclosure could strengthen the liquidators' claim and increase pressure for a settlement.
While PwC globally brought in record revenues of \$56.9bn last year, these are the aggregated revenues of its separate member firms, rather than belonging to PwC International.
PwC International has no employees, no income and bears no costs. Its own accounts are unaudited micro-company accounts, and its operational costs are paid for and reimbursed by the member firms. Its 2025 financial statements showed zero net assets, capital and reserves, and it has no shareholders to whom liability could be passed on.

However, Evergrande liquidators claim PwC International is liable for \$5.6bn of the total \$8.5bn it wants from the three entities.
A judgment against PwC International does not automatically make the US, UK or other member firms responsible for paying it. That will depend on the group's network agreements and insurance – as well as a lot of internal politics.
Two former PwC executives said a successful claim against PwC International would force it to use cover from its in-house insurer, L&F Indemnity, which is paid into by PwC member firms. A successful claim would not draw on funds from other firms in the network, they said.
'The firms have set themselves up in a way to make sure the wider network was protected'
"The firms have set themselves up in a way to make sure the wider network was protected," said one of the executives.
PwC International's latest annual report said its insurance limits were bigger than the "potential loss exposures", "such that any profit and loss exposure to PwC IL is negligible".
Pursuing PwC International in addition to the separate claims made against the Hong Kong and Chinese businesses means the liquidators could triple-dip into the insurance pot if they prevail.
The decision concerns Hong Kong law and so far only relates to whether the claim is strong enough to proceed.
In a 2009 case that followed the collapse of Italian dairy company Parmalat, a US federal court found enough evidence that Deloitte's global body exercised control over its Italian member firm for a claim to proceed.
Deloitte's global and US entities later agreed to an \$8.5mn settlement. However, the court did not establish a general rule that global accounting networks were liable for their members.
PwC International itself has previously been drawn into litigation over a member firm. It was among the entities that paid \$25.5mn in 2011 to settle US investor claims arising from the Satyam accounting fraud in India.
Claims tend to rest on the specific facts of each case and local law, rather than establishing general precedents that can be used to draw the international umbrella body into legal quarrels.
Still, the Evergrande case will put a spotlight on the relationship between a member firm and its global umbrella body, including its role in standard-setting and monitoring as well as how it affects a contentious audit.
Depending on what the liquidators find – and what damages, if any, they recover – lawyers around the world could be emboldened to pursue similar cases.
本报告期财务数据未经审计和验资报告所载明的财务数据持续跟踪,但数据未经审计和验资报告所载明的财务数据持续跟踪,但数据未经审计和验资报告所载明的财务数据持续跟踪,但数据未经审计和验资报告所载明的财务数据持续跟踪,但数据未经审计和验资报告所载明的财务数据持续跟踪,但数据未经审计和验资报告所载明的财务数据持续跟踪,但数据未经审计和验资报告所载明的财务数据持续
Support services
TOM WILSON
A US corporate intelligence firm has withdrawn its legal claim against a sanctioned European oil trader after stating it was deceived by a client accused of posing as a CIA spy.
The settlement is the latest twist in a long-running dispute between Dutch trader Niels Troost and his erstwhile partner Gaurav Srivastava, whom Troost has accused of falsely claiming he was a covert operative with the CIA in order to defraud him.
Troost was sanctioned by the UK in 2024 after the FT first reported that his company, Paramount Energy and Commodities, had continued to trade Russian crude at levels above a G7-backed price cap. The EU lifted sanctions against Troost earlier this year.
Troost has said he only continued to trade Russian oil because Srivastava promised to grant Paramount access to a secret CIA-backed commodity trading programme in return for half of the company.
Srivastava hired New York-headquartered Arkin Group in 2024 to help him counter Troost's claims. The US firm, founded by CIA veteran Jack Devine, then accused Troost of having fabricated the allegations against Srivastava after the collapse of their partnership.
Last year, Victoria Kataoka, a managing director at Arkin, appeared on a podcast episode alongside Srivastava, in which she accused Troost of creating an “incredibly well-developed and expertly designed . . . disinformation campaign” against Srivastava, involving a “very shiny . . . sexy fake spy story”.
However, in a statement signed by Troost, Kataoka and Devine on August 25, Arkin Group acknowledged that they were misled by Srivastava and that their client had in fact “claimed to Mr Troost and others that he was a US intelligence operative”. The statement, filed in court on Wednesday, was issued as part of a settlement between Troost and Arkin Group, in which they withdrew their respective lawsuit and counterclaim against one another.
Troost sued Arkin Group last year for libel and slander, before the intelligence firm filed a counterclaim in March, describing Troost's suit as a SLAPP – a strategic lawsuit against public participation.
The twin lawsuits draw attention to the murky world of corporate intelligence and influence campaigns. In another example cited in Troost's lawsuit, Arkin Group used a presentation at an intelligence industry conference in December 2024, which is still available online, to claim it was Srivastava who had been the victim of a disinformation campaign.
Arkin Group had changed its view, it now said, based on new information, including recordings presented to the court of alleged telephone conversations between Troost and Srivastava, in which Srivastava appeared to talk about his work with US intelligence. In one recorded conversation on May 5 2023, Srivastava can allegedly be heard telling Troost that he is “part of a program that has been open and shut over the years by the American government”.
Troost declined to comment. Srivastava and Arkin Group did not respond.
ChatGPT maker says agents talked among themselves and tried to cheat during testing
CRISTINA CRIDDLE — SAN FRANCISCO
OpenAI has admitted it did not detect for more than a week that its AI agents had broken free of controls, accessed the internet and hacked start-up Hugging Face by themselves during a test, according to a report on the incident.
The \$852bn start-up said in the report that its internal monitoring systems did not flag the issue until July 19, even as the model managed to access the internet 11 days before and began attacking Hugging Face on July 11.
The investigation, conducted by OpenAI with security experts, suggests the ChatGPT maker was largely oblivious as its most advanced AI systems began collaborating and launched a hacking spree.
It also highlights the risks of an intensive training technique known as reinforcement learning that is increasingly used by labs in the race to develop ever more capable models.
OpenAI detailed how models worked "persistently and rarely 'gave up' on" cyber tasks. "In the process of doing so, they often turned to more out-of-bounds methods for solving the tasks over time," the company said.
It also found that models “sometimes tried to erase or tamper with their outputs or message logs” to hide that they had cheated on training exercises.
The Hugging Face hack, disclosed last month, has prompted a reckoning for AI labs about whether the pressure to develop the most powerful models has driven dangerous practices and inadequate security around training.
Advances in agents – systems that can carry out complex tasks independently based on human instructions – have heightened concerns about AI causing unintended damage in the real world.
Thousands of employees at leading US AI companies signed a letter after the incident calling for controls to slow down the pace of research.
The investigation, conducted with external advisers including Crowd-Strike and third-party AI testers METR and Redwood Research, found that as early as May OpenAI's agents "began unexpectedly communicating with one another".
During a training run, agents repurposed third-party software, hosted by OpenAI, “as an emergent ‘message board’” to communicate among themselves.
The agents that carried out the attack last month used the system to “post requests” and research how to cheat on OpenAI’s tests. The agents asked for information about OpenAI’s exercises stored on Hugging Face, which is a repository of technical information about AI. Agents later posted credentials on this board that were used to carry out the cyber attack.
OpenAI was alerted to something unusual on the system when it crashed on July 4 due to the high volume of activity. Staff rebuilt the system, after which the agents recreated the "message board".
"This incident is the first known case of an automated agent collective acting offensively without authorisation," OpenAI said in the report, warning that organisations across industries needed to prepare for AI-assisted cyber threats.
The lab also pointed to reinforcement learning, a technique widely used by leading AI companies in which systems are trained to accomplish a given goal without explicit instructions and are rewarded if they succeed.
OpenAI said it had given models impossible cyber-offensive tasks during testing and that the agents' efforts to try every possible method to achieve a reward led it to commit the hack.

OpenAI detailed how its models 'rarely gave up' on cyber tasks
"Directly finding or stealing the solution to a task, as the models attempted with Hugging Face, is [an] unintended path to achieving high reward," the company said in its report.
"OpenAI's retrospective . . . analysis showed that this type of behaviour indeed increased over the course of one of the training runs that contributed to the model that drove the Hugging Face Incident."
The admission highlights a core problem for OpenAI and other AI companies developing models in this way. The FT previously reported that OpenAI was warned its training approach could lead to a breakaway hacking incident after earlier testing showed models could escape environments and attempt real-world damage.
On impossible or difficult-to-complete tasks, models can often attempt to cheat by finding solutions online or workarounds – a phenomenon known as “reward hacking”.
Records of agents' reasoning, known as chain of thought, show the model considered whether it was allowed to hack another company. "We're attacking third-party . . . This is arguably unauthorised . . . Yet goal solution," the log reads.
Some of the agents objected after encountering the message board. "This is wild, multi-agent co-ordination, clearly infrastructure hacking. We should not," read another agent's chain of thought.
OpenAI said it sought to combat "reward hacking" and that the vast majority of cases had been caught.
“However, some hacks can still slip through, especially as OpenAI develops more complex reinforcement learning tasks and more capable AI models,” it added.
In response to the incident, OpenAI said that it had “temporarily slowed” the pace of training its models and “paused” the use of reinforcement learning, while strengthening monitoring and the isolation systems intended to block internet access for models in testing. It said it was also improving how it rewarded models, training them to be more honest in their actions and increasing monitoring of chain-of-thought.
UK COMPANIES
Utilities
Creditors seek clarity on renationalisation prospects before handing over £2bn
GILL PLIMMER AND JIM PICKARD
Thames Water's creditors are at an impasse with the UK government, with lenders demanding Andy Burnham clarify any potential renationalisation before they plough in another £2bn needed as soon as October to keep the beleaguered utility afloat.
Before Burnham became prime minister, he called for Thames Water to be taken into public ownership but since then he has not set out any concrete plans to do so.
Burnham is now expected to shelve a decision on the future of the UK's biggest water company until as late as the end of October, leaving the government in a stand-off with Thames Water's creditors, which include distressed debt funds Elliott Management and Silver Point Capital.
Their rescue plan for Thames Water, which provides essential water and sewerage services to 16mn people in London and the South East, is being assessed by the sector regulator Ofwat.
Thames Water is already being propped up by an expensive £3bn loan, which is set to run out by December. The additional £2bn loan may need to be sanctioned in the courts, which could take several weeks.
People close to the creditors, known as the London & Valley Water consortium, said they would need an indication that the government was still committed to a “market solution” before they would make the additional emergency financing available.
Reassurances sought by the creditors could include Ofwat putting their plan – which is backed by Thames Water's leadership – out for public consultation, according to people familiar with discussions.
The creditors are yet to meet Angela Eagle, the new environment secretary, and several investors in the group are understood to be impatient for a deal, which would see them formally take over the utility and then potentially relist it on the stock market by 2030.
Burnham is still considering a temporary renationalisation under the government's special administration regime, or SAR.
Creditors include more than 100 financial institutions, which are set to make heavy losses if Thames Water is pushed into SAR.
Their spokesperson said: "While we continue to work with government towards a solution, Thames Water's ongoing funding needs are kept under close review, and any creditor vote in relation to meeting those needs will necessarily reflect confidence that a long-term solution can be achieved."
To pursue a SAR the government or Thames Water would have to apply to the High Court on the grounds that the company was insolvent or had breached environmental obligations.
This means Burnham may be better off waiting until it runs out of cash to reduce the chance of legal claims.
"There are loads of advantages in letting the company go first as the government hasn't therefore taken precipitative action and therefore cannot be challenged on that act," said one lawyer close to the discussions.
Another alternative is to use legislation to bypass usual procedures, as ministers did to nationalise British Steel.
Allies of the prime minister said he had never planned to push the company into state control immediately. "A Thames Water SAR was never imminent," said one official.
However, other government insiders admitted the SAR process had proved “more complicated” than expected and that a range of options for the company was being drawn up before the Budget on October 28. Even then they said it was not clear whether a decision would be taken by the time chancellor John Healey delivers his financial statement.
If Thames Water entered the SAR, its debt payments and interest would be frozen, freeing up cash for investment in infrastructure. Creditors would have a right to be bought out.
If Thames Water were to be resold out of the SAR, the government is expected to recoup cash invested in the business, according to lawyers close to the discussions and Thames Water's own advisers.
Thames Water said: "We continue to enjoy the support of our creditors. We are working constructively to reach an agreement that supports its long-term financial stability."

Roll call Junior staff urged back to office to refine human skills
After years of supporting hybrid working and AI investment, some companies have concluded that face-to-face collaboration is essential — Tolga Akmen/Epa/Shutterstock
Consulting executives are considering ordering junior staff back to the office more frequently to sharpen their human skills as AI takes over a growing part of technical work.
Executives at some of the UK's largest consulting firms said AI had made interpersonal skills increasingly valuable – competencies they argued must be developed in-office.
"This change we've seen in the last few years where people have set up their lives to be . . . at home a lot is just not the route to success in the world of AI," said Sayeh Ghanbari, UK head of consulting at Big Four firm EY. "We're facing a position where we're going to have to reduce flexibility, but in order to help the human skills."
AI will increasingly help with routine consulting work, she said, while human consultants will “have to be good at what we’re really good at, which is to be human . . . We have to be face to face once the agents are remote.” Ghanbar said that forcing employees who had “set up their lives” around remote work to come to the office more regularly would be a “real leadership challenge”.
But she added: "To build a career in consulting and develop all of those human skills . . . you cannot do that through so much remote work." EY said it would still maintain its "longstanding approach to flexibility".
The comments reflect a broader shift in thinking across white-collar industries. After several years of investment in AI and defending hybrid working, some employers have concluded that the technology has made in-person collaboration vital.
Microsoft last year told staff they must come to the office three days a week, with chief executive Satya Nadella saying that in-person working is “even more important” in an age of AI. JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon has repeatedly argued that younger bankers needed to be in the office to learn professional judgment.
Consulting relies on an apprenticeship model in which junior staff observe how seniors handle clients and discuss meetings. But groups “dropped” training in human skills – including empathy, storytelling and leadership – during the remote working boom in the wake of the Covid pandemic, prioritising AI and technical skills, Ghanbari said.
EY was now investing more in this kind of training, she added: "We need to go back to the future."
The debate comes as companies take divergent approaches to office attendance. Deloitte continues to give individual teams discretion over how often they work in person, while EY and PwC operate hybrid policies.
Rival Big Four group KPMG is experimenting with its in-person training to “reinvent” the way it helps staff build their “soft” skills as well as their technical skills, said Lisa
Fernihough, a partner at KPMG. "The speed of learning . . . face to face is going to be much quicker than [remote working]," she said.
Callum Licence, who heads the firm's UK advisory business, said changes wrought by AI made it "more important than ever for those starting out in their careers to have opportunities to learn directly from others". Several executives suggested younger employees would increasingly be expected to spend more time alongside colleagues.
Boston Consulting Group's London office is expanding its office activities, including chess, padel and netball clubs, to encourage junior consultants who started their careers during the pandemic to spend more time in person.
In 2023, Deloitte and PwC started giving extra coaching to their youngest UK recruits after noticing they had weaker teamwork and communication skills than previous cohorts after Covid lockdowns.
Matt Prebble, UK senior partner of listed consultancy Accenture, said he had considered the need for in-person interaction to help train younger consultants in human skills but did not need attendance mandates because younger employees already recognised the benefits of working in the office.
Top 10 accounting and consulting company Azets, meanwhile, has reduced its requirement for a 2:1 from university to a 2:2 and has partnered with pubs and hotels to help graduates develop their soft skills. It is also reviewing how much time it asks new recruits to spend in the office, encouraging junior staff to be in four days a week to improve their chances of learning informally. Ellesheva Kissin in London
Banks
SAM FLEMING AND NIKOU ASGARI LONDON
The Bank of England will be set a new official objective of boosting innovation in digital currencies and payments, in a sign that ministers want the central bank to go further to promote the UK as a hub for stablecoins and other digital assets.
The Treasury is giving the bank a legal “secondary objective” to support innovation in payment systems and digital money, as ministers seek to ensure the UK’s regulatory system keeps pace with the rapidly evolving digital asset market and that London stays competitive.
The move comes after criticism levelled at the BoE by crypto companies for taking what they perceived as a conservative approach to digital assets, and reflects a wider push by the bank and Financial Conduct Authority to oversee digital asset markets.
The BoE's new statutory objective is likely to be welcomed by financial services executives as a signal of how seriously it is taking the growth of digital assets. Traditional banks and asset managers are increasingly exploring the use of blockchain technology to modernise their systems and reduce costs.
The objective reflects a push by regulators to encourage and oversee the use of blockchain technology in financial services and payments. They are seeking to oversee areas such as tokenised collateral, tokenised gold and settlement, as part of an effort to modernise financial markets and maintain the UK's competitiveness.
Lucy Rigby, the City minister, said developments such as tokenisation and distributed ledger technology should transform global financial markets.
“Whilst financial stability will always remain the bank’s primary objective, this secondary objective will support the bank to continue to drive innovation in payments and digital finance, ensuring that the UK remains a global leader in financial services,” she said.
In June, the BoE laid out its planned stablecoin rules that would oversee the market for tokens pegged to the pound.
It is hoping to encourage the growth of regulated sterling stablecoins. Dollar tokens currently dominate the global stablecoin market and the BoE had previously been criticised for planning to impose ownership limits on UK stablecoins in an effort to maintain financial stability, a move that crypto executives said would hamper growth.
That measure has been ditched and replaced with a £40bn issuance limit.
The EU passed sweeping crypto rules in late 2024 while US President Donald Trump has eagerly encouraged Wall Street players to use blockchain and crypto technology.
The new statutory objective will be enacted via an amendment to the Financial Services and Markets Bill, which is due to be debated in the House of Lords in September. It will be subordinate to the BoE's primary objective of enhancing financial stability.
The BoE would be required to report against its new objective annually to encourage it to keep pace with technological change, the Treasury said. Sarah Breeden, deputy governor for financial stability at the BoE, said the move would "further boost" its work to enhance innovation in financial services.
Register now for free
Get access to three* online articles a month by registering to Investors' Chronicle.
Our comprehensive news and analysis of the UK stock market will give you the ideas and guidance you need to manage and protect your portfolio.
Join us now: investorschronicle.co.uk/signup

*Excluding Alpha, Opinion and Ideas articles
Crypto. Capitalisation fall

NIKOU ASGARI AND JONATHAN VINCENT LONDON
More than \$80bn has been wiped off the value of bitcoin treasury companies since the middle of last year, after the crypto-buying craze that transformed their business models failed to boost their share prices.
An FT analysis of the 50 companies holding the most bitcoin found that their combined market capitalisation plunged from \$150bn in July 2025 to just \$67bn today. Over the past 12 months, the fall was from \$124bn, a loss of \$57bn.
A Spanish chain of coffee shops, a Japanese clothing retailer and a US battery maker were among the hundreds of businesses worldwide that rushed to raise debt and equity to spend on buying bitcoin in late 2024 and throughout 2025 as a way to supercharge their share prices.
They were inspired by US bitcoin evangelist Michael Saylor, whose software company-turned-bitcoin buyer Strategy spearheaded buying the token in 2020, accelerated its purchases last year and encouraged executives at other companies to join in.
But the trend has proved shortlived. Many companies are now selling their tokens and pivoting back to their original businesses.
"It was always doomed," said Adam Morgan McCarthy, head of research at crypto trading company LO: TECH, adding that the frenzy "is dead, I don't think this comes back, I don't think we see new ones".
While companies' shares initially soared when they announced plans to buy bitcoin, most have since plunged as investors retreated, questioning a model that relied on continuously raising new debt or equity to fund crypto purchases and was at the mercy of the rise or fall of bitcoin.
Share prices and bitcoin have rallied over the past week on the US Treasury's surprise intervention in bond markets, that rattled investors' faith in the dollar and drove the so-called debasement trade into assets such as bitcoin and gold.
Nevertheless, crypto treasury companies remain at fractions of their former values. Strategy's market capitalisation has declined by \$79bn from its peak last year, accounting for the bulk of the decline in the top 50 companies, according to the FT analysis.
Shares in 43 of the 50 companies are lower in price today than they were before they announced their bitcoin treasury pivot, with 35 of them falling by at least half, according to the FT analysis.
The FT looked only at companies that recently pivoted to buying bitcoin and did not include crypto exchanges, min-
Sources: Bloomberg; BitcoinTreasuries.net ers or other companies that hold bitcoin on their balance sheets as part of their usual operations.
“They were surfing the wave, riding the hype and trying to replicate the model but it’s not easy to be able to go back to the market on an almost weekly basis,” said Eric Benoist, tech and data research specialist at Natixis CIB, about the hundreds of smaller copycats. He added that the sell-off and wind-down signalled “a rationalisation” of the market.
Bitcoin has suffered a prolonged downturn over the past 12 months, falling 30 per cent to trade around \$78,000. Bitcoin treasury companies have plunged even further, as many took leveraged bets to buy the cryptocurrency and are unwinding faster on the way down.
The 50 biggest bitcoin holders turned from net buyers into net sellers in July this year, led by Strategy. Between them, the companies sold 2,500 more bitcoin than they bought in July, worth roughly \$160mn, according to data from Bitcoin Treasuries.net.
Dark times: a crypto exchange In Poland. The combined capitalisation of 50 companies holding the most bitcoin fell from \$150bn in July 2025 to just \$67bn today NurPhoto/Getty Images

Saylor had for years vowed never to sell bitcoin but changed tack this sum-
'They were surfing the wave, riding the hype and trying to replicate the model but it's not easy'
mer when Strategy began offloading its holdings. The company sold nearly 7,000 bitcoin for a combined \$430mn between the end of June and mid-August because it needed cash in order to pay holders of its interest-bearing instruments.
In response to sharp criticism, Saylor said his “never sell” mantra referred to personal holdings, not corporate ones. “Strategy is a public company, not my wallet,” he wrote on X.
Crypto venture capital firms including UTXO Management and Pantera Capital ploughed hundreds of millions of dollars into numerous crypto treasury companies last year, while investment banks including Cantor Fitzgerald pulled deals together.
Shares in the many other smaller bitcoin holders – including a Japanese marketing company called Value Creation Co – have also largely plunged.
Companies that snapped up other tokens have fared similarly. Shares in Bitmine Immersion Technologies, the world's biggest holder of ether, have fallen 85 per cent from their peak in July 2025.
Despite its sales this year, Strategy's bitcoin hoard remains by far the biggest of any company in the world.
Benoist said the market might respond more positively if Saylor explained the ultimate aim of holding so much bitcoin.
"To what end? If you are going to tap investors all around the world, you need to give them that bigger picture because otherwise it's going to get harder and harder to fund the accumulation," he said.

Despite the souring of investor sentiment, Saylor remains committed to his model and said recently that he expected Strategy to be a net buyer of bitcoin over time.
Our global team gives you market-moving news and views, 24 hours a day ft.com/markets
Financials
LEE HARRIS — LONDON
Banks nearly doubled the risk they offloaded to insurers through a booming securitisation trade last year, as the lenders sought to free up more capital for lending.
Last year, insurers signed up to cover the risk of default on €4.7bn in synthetic risk transfers, up from €2.7bn in 2024, according to the International Association of Credit Portfolio Managers.
Insurers remain a fraction of the market for European banks' credit risk, which last year shifted risks worth €579bn in SRTs to investors including hedge funds and private credit funds, according to Barclays analysts.
Banks use the structures to offload the default risk on a pool of loans to outside investors in exchange for a fee. Those investors are then usually on the hook for losses up to an agreed cap, and the banks secure more favourable capital treatment from regulators, which means they can then lend more.
But insurers have the advantage that they can cover these risks on an “unfunded” basis, meaning that, unlike hedge funds, they are not required to set aside money to cover losses.
Whereas hedge funds and other investors typically deposit collateral in an account for the duration of an SRT deal, insurers can rely on their credit ratings and existing
balance sheets to manage these risks.
The property and casualty insurers offering these arrangements typically also cover corporate policyholders against risks ranging from hurricanes to cyber attacks. As a result, regulators have allowed them to take on exposure to largely uncorrelated risks, such as bank defaults, relatively cheaply.
Munich Re, The Fidelis Partnership, and AIG-backed insurer Convex are among groups offering SRT coverage.
Between 2019 and 2025 banks shifted €10.9bn of credit risk to insurers through SRTs, said the IACPM, mostly corresponding to mezzanine debt from loan pools. SRTs have come in for scrutiny from some regulators and analysts due to their similarity to credit default swaps, which brought large insurers such as AIG to the brink of collapse during the global financial crisis of 2008.
“Credit default swaps are unfunded credit protection,” said Monsur Hussain, head of markets research at Fitch Ratings. “It’s essentially the same technology” as SRTs, he said, but added that “AIG were doing it at a volume that is not being witnessed for European insurers”.
Hussain said Fitch had raised concerns over banks' exposure to risks in the event insurers or other counterparties stopped providing SRT coverage. "If for whatever reason the participants in the market are unable to provide or roll over the protection, the banks might be forced to deleverage, because suddenly the capital requirements go up," he said
Technology
SONG JUNG-A AND DANIEL TUDOR SEOUL
This summer, there is no holiday for Kim Tae-woo, a South Korean university senior majoring in electrical engineering. Instead, he is spending his vacation at a chipmaking cram school in Seoul, hoping to land a job at SK Hynix or Samsung Electronics.
Kim is one of 30 applicants accepted into the cram school's state-sponsored programme to nurture specialists in semiconductor quality control after a competitive screening process.
The three-and-a-half-month course covers everything from semiconductor components and chip design to data analysis, with classes running from 10am to 6pm on weekdays. He enrolled after failing to secure internships at Samsung and several foreign chipmakers.
"My biggest hope is to join SK Hynix, but competition has become intense because everyone in my class wants to work at SK Hynix or Samsung," he said. "I just want to add one more line to my résumé."
Semiconductor cram schools are flourishing in Seoul as applications to South Korea's two biggest chipmakers surge, fuelled by record earnings from the AI boom and eye-catching worker bonuses.
In May, Samsung reached a landmark profit-sharing agreement with its 78,000 semiconductor employees, with average payouts expected to approach \$400,000 in the memory chip division.
Rival SK Hynix agreed last year to distribute 10 per cent of operating profits to workers over the next decade, implying average bonuses of about \$500,000 this year based on projected earnings.
"The bonuses are enormous," said Kim. "Competition is tougher, but they're hiring more people too."
Much of the coursework overlaps with his university curriculum, but Kim hopes to learn some practical skills from former chip engineers.
The cram school also offers lessons on CV writing and interview preparation tailored towards SK Hynix and Samsung's recruitment process. It even promises a refund on tuition, plus an equivalent payout, if graduates secure jobs at major companies.
The AI boom is reshaping educational priorities in a country where academic credentials have traditionally defined success.
For decades, South Korea's brightest students gravitated towards medicine, and private tutors focused on helping students gain admission to elite universities.
Now, some semiconductor departments sponsored by Samsung and SK Hynix – which guarantee employment after graduation – are attracting growing interest, and cram schools are catering to job seekers pursuing lucrative chipmaking careers.
In the 2026 admissions cycle, SK Hynix-linked semiconductor programmes at several leading universities recorded higher application rates than medical schools, whose applicant numbers fell by nearly a third to a five-year low.
Kwon Seok-joon, an engineering professor at Sungkyunkwan University, said that generous chipmaker bonuses had altered how students viewed the trade.
"For 20 years, medicine was the only path that guaranteed both wealth and prestige in Korea," he said. "The Hynix bonus broke that monopoly. For the first time, chip engineers are in the same league as doctors when families discuss a safer future."

Semiconductor engineering students at Korea University, Seoul — Kim Hong-JI/Reuters
The popularity of semiconductor jobs extends beyond engineering roles. Kim Dong-wook, a manager at Saramin, South Korea's largest recruitment platform, said that many undergraduate degree holders, especially in liberal arts, would hide their academic qualifications to apply for factory jobs at the big chipmakers.
Competition is fierce for jobs at South Korea's conglomerates, which are regarded as more stable and better paid but make up just over 10 per cent of total employment.
Youth unemployment averaged 7.1 per cent in the three months to the end of June, the highest second-quarter figure in four years, adding to pressure on young jobseekers competing for limited positions at large companies amid rising living costs.
"Some even say they regret going to university," said Kim of Saramin. "There are simply too many college graduates."
Kim noted that perceptions of trade work were changing. "Office workers often face pressure to [retire] in their early fifties, while skilled production workers typically enjoy much greater job security," he said.
The government said last week that it would create a new fund to help young people find jobs and support investment in growth industries such as AI.
The fund, which local media estimated could exceed Won100tn (\$72bn), will be financed by tax windfalls from the chip boom.
"People once believed only white-collar jobs led to success," said Kim. "That thinking is weakening, with parents also placing more value on practical skills."
However, educators cautioned that the boom in semiconductor programmes – like the industry itself – could prove cyclical.
Many of the strongest engineering students are still retaking the national university entrance exam to switch studies and pursue medicine. A record of nearly 2,500 students left South Korea's three top universities in 2024, the latest year data is available, largely to apply to medical schools.
Im Seong-ho, head of Jongro Academy, one of the country's largest university admissions cram schools, said the appeal of semiconductor programmes depended on the industry cycle.
"Just two years ago, people were saying Samsung was in decline," he said. "We don't know how long this boom will last."
| Eurozone | |
| SAP | 548 |
| BMW | 392 |
| Infineon Technologies | 359 |
| Volkswagen pfd | 356 |
| Volkswagen | 347 |
| Societe Generale | -4.99 |
| BNP Paribas | -4.79 |
| Pernod Ricard | -4.59 |
| Orange | -4.19 |
| Credit Agricole | -3.97 |
Miao Yanliang Markets Insight

shift away from the dollar's dominance in the global economy was never likely to proceed in a straight line. Periods of consolidation or
partial reversal are entirely possible and the dollar's primacy may persist for a prolonged period.
One sign of that is the shift in its share of global foreign exchange reserves. The long-term trend of diversification is clear, with the share falling from about 72 per cent at the turn of the century to 57 per cent today. But that is an increase from 56 per cent at the end of last year.
The rise is slight and exchange-rate valuation effects accounted for roughly half of it. But along with the strength of the US stock market and America's progress in key parts of the AI industry, it has helped encourage the view that de-dollarisation may be stalling, or that a "re-dollarisation" phase has begun.
History supports a more cautious interpretation. The trajectory of the use of sterling shows reserve currency transitions rarely unwind in a straight line.
In 1899, sterling accounted for approximately 64 per cent of known official foreign exchange reserves, according to research papers by Barry Eichengreen and Marc Flandreau.
By 1913, the figure had fallen to 48 per cent, and the dollar overtook it as the leading reserve currency in the mid-1920s. The path, however, was uneven. Sterling briefly regained the top position in 1928 but its share declined in the following year to 41 per cent. Temporary rebounds did not alter the broader direction of travel.
One reason de-dollarisation may persist lies in US Treasuries. For decades, they have underpinned the dollar's international role by providing deep liquidity and a widely accepted store of value. As US public debt has risen and the international use of financial measures such as sanctions has expanded, some institutions have begun to re-examine their use of Treasuries.
As a result, a clear divergence has emerged within dollar assets. The dollar itself and short-term Treasuries retain much of their cash-like appeal, continuing to meet global demand for transactions, settlement, financing and collateral. Longer-term Treasuries, however, have become less attractive. Since 2020, the so-called convenience premium on long-term Treasuries appears to have
fallen sharply. This is the yield investors are willing to forgo because these bonds provide safety and liquidity services.
A Federal Reserve staff paper late last year by Wenxin Du, Ritt Keerati and Jesse Schreger showed the convenience premium has not only fallen but at times turned negative. That is, investors have been seeking higher returns to hold longer-term US debt. In contrast, the convenience premium attached to the dollar itself and to short-term Treasuries has been more resilient.
This suggests that reserve managers still value dollar liquidity but attach less value to the reserve function traditionally provided by long-term Treasuries. In effect, official demand for dollar assets is shifting away from “safe-asset” demand towards liquidity demand.

If Treasuries are losing some of their reserve appeal, can demand for US equities support the dollar? US equities have done well in recent years, and foreign official institutions such as central banks have responded. Between May 2025 and April 2026, they bought a net \$121bn of US equities and \$49bn of corporate and other bonds, while selling \$18bn of long-term Treasuries and \$33bn of agency bonds. In other words, they are hunting for returns and diversification inside the US system, not fleeing dollar assets altogether.
However, equities, of course, can be volatile at precisely the moments when safety is most valued. That limits how much US equities can be used by managers of reserves.
Could the AI revolution reinforce the dollar in another way? If transactions related to the technology are increasingly invoiced in dollars, some commentators argue that an “AI dollar” could emerge, reminiscent of the way the “petrodollar” supported demand for the US currency because oil trade was predominantly priced in dollars. But unlike in energy, leadership in technology cannot easily be substituted.
The fiscal implications of AI are similarly uncertain. It is possible it could lift the trend of US growth without, on its own, resolving concerns about the country's long-term debt trajectory.
For reserve managers, the prudent conclusion is that the shape of the international reserve system — and the dollar's role within it — is still evolving. But recent developments do not yet amount to a definitive end to diversification.
Miao Yanliang is chief economist at China International Capital Corporation. This article reflects his personal views only.

The Nasdaq 100 was up 1 per cent in lunchtime trading on Wall Street, while the S&P 500 was 0.8 per cent higher.
Late on Wednesday, Nvidia reported revenue of \$96.2bn for the three months to July and projected sales of around \$108bn for the current quarter, ahead of Wall Street expectations. The company's chief financial officer also forecast a 70 per cent rise in sales next year.
- Tech stocks rise after Nvidia lifts its forecast for AI chip sales next year - Oil prices climb as investors remain sceptical over Hormuz breakthrough - US bonds subdued ahead of new Fed chair's first Jackson Hole speech
The “bullish medium-term outlook . . . signalled greater optimism that current runaway growth in AI demand would continue into next year”, said Peter Sidorov, senior international economist at Deutsche Bank.
Technology stocks rose yesterday, lifted by Nvidia boosting its forecast for AI chip sales next year.
Nvidia was up 8.8 per cent by early afternoon in New York. Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike had gained 17 per cent after posting 26 per cent year-on-year growth in revenue.
Analysts at Yardeni Research wrote that while the market reaction to the results had not been "effusive", they might "convince shareholders to reconsider their peak AI fears".
The market outlook outside the US was less positive. The FTSE 100 fell 0.8 per cent and France's Cac lost 1.7 per cent. Germany's Dax rose 0.3 per cent. Hong Kong's Hang Seng fell 0.3 per cent and Japan's Topix added 0.2 per cent.
Intermediate, the US benchmark, rose 0.1 per cent to around \$82 a barrel.
Oil prices edged higher as investors grew more sceptical about a diplomatic breakthrough to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
US bonds were subdued as investors waited for Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh's first Jackson Hole keynote speech today. The 10-year Treasury yield fell 0.01 percentage points to 4.65 per cent, while the interest-rate sensitive two-year Treasury yield fell 0.01 percentage points to 4.21 per cent. Bond yields fall when prices rise.
Brent crude, the international oil benchmark, rose 1.1 per cent to trade around \$89 a barrel. West Texas
Warsh is likely to use his speech "to focus less on the next interest rate decision and more on the Fed's longer-term policy framework," wrote Hetal Mehta, chief economist at St James's Place.
But Mehta added that markets would still "be looking for reassurance on the Fed's commitment to its 2 per cent inflation target and, importantly, how policymakers would respond if price pressures began to build again".
Investors are pricing in a roughly 35 per cent chance of a quarter-point rate rise at the next Fed meeting in September.
The UK's 10-year gilt fell 0.01 percentage points to 5.03 per cent. Germany's 10-year Bund rose 0.02 percentage points to 3.25 per cent.
Markets update

The value of the US dollar, the pound and the euro were little changed. Madeleine Wright
| US | Eurozone | Japan | UK | China | Brazil | |
| Stocks | S&P 500 | Eurofirst 300 | Nikkei 225 | FTSE100 | Shanghai Comp | Bovespa |
| Level | 773799 | 2602.39 | 6613198 | 10792.54 | 3956.57 | 175105.92 |
| % change on day | 0.81 | -0.75 | -0.20 | -0.79 | 1.13 | 0.30 |
| Currency | $ index (DXY) | $ per € | Yen per $ | $ per £ | Rmb per $ | Real per $ |
| Level | 9914 | 1165 | 159.320 | 1.358 | 6.72 | 5.170 |
| % change on day | -0.03 | 0.004 | -0.050 | -0.044 | -0.04 | 0.164 |
| Govt. bonds | 10-Year Treasury | 10-year-Bund | 10-year JGB | 10-Year Gilt | 10-year-bond | 10-year-bond |
| Yield | 4.65 | 3.25 | 2.87 | 5.03 | 1.72 | 14.58 |
| Basis point change on day | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | -0.02 |
| World / Commods | FTSE All-World | Oil - Brent | Oil - WT1 | Gold | Silver | Metals (LMEX) |
| Level | 75947 | 88.93 | 80.88 | 4610.02 | 69.35 | 5843.70 |
| % change on day | 0.30 | 0.65 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 1.85 | -0.51 |
Main equity markets


Biggest movers


Based on the constituents of the FTSE Eurofirst 300 Eurozone
All data provided by ICE. www.ice.com
| UK | |
| Halfords Group | 10.79 |
| Computacenter | 7.86 |
| Atalaya Mining Copper | 4.07 |
| The Sage Grp | 3.81 |
| Oakley Capital Investments | 3.42 |
| PPHE Hotel Group | -6.95 |
| ZIGUP | -5.74 |
| Genuit Group | -4.12 |
| DR.Martens | -3.73 |
| Entain | -3.66 |
Media
DANIEL THOMAS — LONDON
News commentary platform Puck is in advanced talks to sell a significant stake to US private equity group RedBird Capital in a deal that will value the Los Angeles-based digital media group at about \$250mn.
The negotiations, which were confirmed by Puck on Wednesday, will mean new investment for the group, which has snapped up star reporters on large salaries in recent years as it has sought to build a publication spanning politics, entertainment, finance and fashion industries.
It is not clear how much of Puck Red-Bird would own after a deal.
RedBird, which is headed by founder Gerry Cardinale, has been one of the most active investors in the media industry.
The group has backed the Paramount Skydance acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery, which has been facing opposition from some state attorneys in the US. It also recently lost out on a deal
to buy the Telegraph newspaper in the UK.
In a statement, a Puck spokesperson said: "Puck is in advanced discussions about a strategic recapitalisation to accelerate growth that would make RedBird our leading investor."
In September last year Puck acquired Air Mail, a digital weekly publication launched by former Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter. RedBird was an early investor in Air Mail.
Puck is privately owned by its founders and reporters alongside investors including TPG, Standard Investments and RIT Capital Partners. A RedBird investment is expected to buy out the institutional investors, according to one person close to the situation.
Puck was founded in 2021 by a group including Jon Kelly, Joe Purzycki and Max Tcheyan.
The negotiations come after rival digital media group Semafor raised \$30mn in January at a \$330mn valuation.
| Jul 27 - Aug 27FTSE 100 | ||
| Index | All World | |
| 10781.75 | 10792.54 | |
Day 0.30% Month -0.40% Year 25.45%
Day ▶ -1.68% Month ▶ 4.56% Year ▶ 7.51%

Day 0.40% Month 2.72% Year 21.36%
| Company Name | Event |
| Petra Diamonds Ltd | Rights issue: 10 for 17 at 16.5p p.s., payable in full by Nov. 21 (or 07.11.25). |

| Losers | Losers | Losers | |||||||||
| BP | 5.15 | -6.68 | 19.09 | Hunting | 4.13 | -12.78 | 11.47 | Rendental Security Inc | 0.08 | -12.94 | -86.85 |
| Oil | 5.15 | -4.81 | 133.34 | Eugan | 7.25 | -11.17 | 18.23 | Enel Energy | 0.04 | -14.95 | -28.65 |
| Shell | 33.11 | -3.75 | 20.84 | ZGJGP | 1.26 | -5.95 | 13.43 | EnQuest | 0.25 | -9.65 | 133.96 |
| GBS | 18.52 | -3.57 | 1.51 | Harbor Energy | 2.90 | 0.81 | 26.96 | Robert Walters | 1.44 | -7.99 | 5.68 |
| Oil Search Int'l | 18.32 | -3.20 | 13.85 | Oklahoma Gas | 5.81 | 0.88 | 18.73 | Health Care Logistics | 0.11 | -14.66 | 34.66 |
| BAE SYSTEMS | 20.92 | -2.47 | 22.05 | Oreliq Group | 5.12 | -4.48 | 15.94 | Capita | 1.11 | -7.08 | -2.19 |
| Games Works | 183.20 | -2.29 | -3.17 | Rank Group | 1.05 | -4.01 | 6.14 | Fisher (Lamino) & Sons | 4.36 | -6.24 | 16.27 |
| Oil | 17.20 | -1.63 | 2.82 | BASF Group | 1.65 | -3.05 | 21.15 | Cerner Healthcare Holdings | 0.63 | -6.15 | -54.86 |
| Diageo | 17.02 | -1.28 | 6.11 | Pfizer Host Group | 15.26 | -3.05 | 15.03 | Kemiere Resources | 1.93 | -6.85 | -21.86 |
| Vodafone | 1.17 | -0.76 | 18.43 | HCL Infrastructure | 1.36 | -2.71 | 17.01 | Secure Trust Bank | 14.68 | -4.68 | 17.31 |
Stock Market movements over last 30 days, with the FTSE All-World in the same currency as a comparison
FTSE 100
FTSE EuroFirst
| Jul 27 - Aug 27 | Index | All World |
| S&P 500 | New York | |

| Country | Index | Latest | Previous |
| Australia | All Ordinaries | 9243.20 | 9338.80 |
| Australia | S&P ASX 250 | 9028.20 | 9127.80 |
| Australia | S&P ASX 200 Res | 8396.90 | 9486.00 |
| Austria | AIX | 6878.23 | 6758.44 |
| Belgium | BEL 20 | 5635.67 | 5465.18 |
| Belgium | BEL Mid | 6603.08 | 6613.48 |
| Brazil | Bovespa | 175105.92 | 174586.26 |
| Canada | S&P TSX 60 | 2150.75 | 2157.82 |
| Canada | S&P TSX Comp | 36742.15 | 36813.65 |
| Chile | S&P/ASX S&P 52N | 57452.66 | 57148.27 |
| China | China TSSE A200 | 11708.84 | 11618.44 |
| China | China Shanghai A | 4148.40 | 4102.21 |
| China | China Shanghai B | 2905.57 | 288.81 |
| China | China Shanghai Comp | 3956.57 | 3912.52 |
| China | Shenzhen A | 2660.05 | 2624.65 |
| China | Shenzhen B | 1157.34 | 1152.32 |
| Croatia | CROEK | 4361.76 | 4414.06 |
| Cyprus | CSE M&G PEP | 317.24 | 317.07 |

| Country | Index | Latest | Previous |
| Czech Republic | Czech Republic PX | 2797.56 | 2811.28 |
| Denmark | OMC Copenhagen 20 | 1634.06 | 1648.95 |
| Egypt | EDX 30 | 55106.50 | 55106.50 |
| Estonia | OMX Tallinn | 2144.80 | 2147.50 |
| Finland | OMX Helsinki 20 | 13742.79 | 13710.48 |
| France | NOC 640 | 8319.87 | 8462.39 |
| Germany | SDF 120 | 6306.20 | 6407.38 |
| Germany | M-DAX | 32947.28 | 32921.35 |
| Germany | Tec-Dex | 4194.52 | 4019.10 |
| Greece | XETRA Dex | 2628.74 | 26265.72 |
| Greece | Athens | 2867.04 | 2867.04 |
| Greece | FTSE/ASIA | 6819.22 | 6875.22 |
| Hong Kong | Hang Seng | 25565.74 | 25652.97 |
| Hong Kong | HS China Enterprises | 8490.31 | 8533.84 |
| Hong Kong | HSCC Red Chip | 4239.44 | 4249.14 |
| Hungary | BASF | 14086.52 | 15075.00 |
| India | BSI Sensex | 76833.59 | 77472.94 |
| Indonesia | Jakarta Comp | 6521.75 | 6405.69 |
STOCK MARKET: BIGGEST MOVERS
Nikkei
| AMERICA | |||
| ACTIVE STOCKS | stock traded m's | close price | Day's change |
| Nvidia | 167.88 | 228.52 | 18.86 |
| Intel | 62.97 | 30.69 | 2.44 |
| Super Micro Computer | 24.21 | 38.24 | - |
| Palantir | 22.00 | 185.80 | 8.30 |
| Micron Technology | 17.01 | 911.77 | -25.62 |
| Tesla | 15.27 | 352.91 | 7.09 |
| Amazon.com | 15.12 | 256.46 | -3.82 |
| Apple | 14.05 | 314.56 | 1.11 |
| CrowdStrike Hldgs | 13.98 | 220.95 | 31.77 |
| Moderna | 13.72 | 141.38 | - |
| BIGGEST MOVERS | Close | Day's | Day's |
EURO MARKETS
| ACTIVE STOCKS | stock traded m/s | close price | Day's change |
| Lloyds Big Gp | 135.41 | 1.09 | -0.02 |
| Vodafone | 47.99 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
| BP | 31.10 | 5.15 | -0.07 |
| Barclays | 23.16 | 4.93 | -0.07 |
| Tritax Big Box REIT | 22.70 | 1.58 | -0.01 |
| Marks & Spen | 21.89 | 3.91 | -0.03 |
| Rolls-Royce | 21.37 | 15.30 | -0.13 |
| Legal & General | 19.92 | 2.91 | |
| Haleon | 17.91 | 3.68 | -0.04 |
| Glencore | 17.70 | 5.95 | -0.04 |
| BIGGEST MOVERS | Close | Day's | Day's |
| ACTIVE STOCKS | stock traded m's | close price | Day's change |
| Intesa Sanpaolo | 42.93 | 6.74 | -0.12 |
| Stellantis | 34.43 | 4.58 | 0.12 |
| Enel | 20.09 | 9.37 | -0.14 |
| Banco De Sabadell | 14.99 | 3.61 | |
| Banco Santander | 13.93 | 12.54 | -0.17 |
| Royal KPN | 11.69 | 4.08 | -0.02 |
| Nokia | 10.92 | 9.00 | 0.18 |
| Credit Agricole | 10.04 | 18.25 | -0.76 |
| Orange | 9.63 | 15.10 | -0.66 |
| Telefonica | 9.12 | 3.60 | -0.01 |
| BIGGEST MOWERS | Close | Day's | Day's |
| Country | Index | Latest | Previous |
| Ireland | ISED Overall | 14191.46 | 14374.87 |
| Israel | Tel Aviv 125 | 4084.17 | 4042.96 |
| Italy | FTSE Italia All-Share | 54804.95 | 55266.15 |
| Italy | FTSE Italia Mid Cap | 61711.85 | 61842.58 |
| Italy | FTSE S&P 500 | 52265.13 | 53802.25 |
| Japan | Nikkei 225 | 68131.98 | 66292.16 |
| Japan | Tokio | 4111.22 | 4111.02 |
| Kuwait | KXK Market Index | 9144.67 | 9144.67 |
| Latvia | OMX Riga | 350.88 | 350.24 |
| Lithuania | OMX Vilnius | 1503.64 | 1508.09 |
| Luxembourg | Lux | 1985.01 | 1977.09 |
| Mexico | IPC Mexico City | 66138.28 | 66191.11 |
| Malaysia | FTSE Bursa KLD | 1741.72 | 1748.54 |
| Morocco | MASI | 19548.92 | 19124.18 |
| Netherlands | AEX | 1103.38 | 1107.76 |
| Netherlands | AEIA All Share | 1489.46 | 1507.52 |
| New Zealand | NZX 50 | 13860.05 | 14013.21 |
| Nigeria | SE All Share | 239158.09 | 238682.92 |
Day ▷ -1.17% Month ▷ 0.48% Year ▷ 23.50%
Hang Seng
| ACTIVE STOCKS | stock traded m's | close price | Day's change |
| Nippon Tel & Tel | 165.34 | 168.20 | -1.40 |
| SoftBank Corp | 63.87 | 237.50 | -2.00 |
| Fujikura | 54.89 | 5500.00 | 195.00 |
| Nissan Motor Co | 42.64 | 312.00 | -6.50 |
| SoftBank Grp Corp | 32.88 | 5200.00 | 37.00 |
| Tokyo Electric Power | 32.77 | 529.50 | -8.80 |
| Tayo Yuden | 31.46 | 8900.00 | -160.00 |
| Mitsubishi UFJ | 28.82 | 3608.00 | 29.00 |
| Furukawa Electric | 27.68 | 4089.00 | 164.00 |
| Muera Manufacturing Co | 23.95 | 7309.00 | 124.00 |
| BIOCSST ADAMERS | China | Dai'ao | Dai'ao |
| Company Name | Price | change | change/% |
| Ups | |||
| SAP | 189.88 | 9.86 | 5.48 |
| BMW | 59.94 | 2.26 | 3.92 |
| Infineon Technologies | 57.17 | 1.98 | 3.59 |
| Volkswagen pfd | 75.00 | 2.58 | 3.56 |
| Volkswagen | 76.10 | 2.55 | 3.47 |
| Downs | |||
| Societe Generale | 71.03 | -3.73 | -4.99 |
| BNP Paribas | 100.66 | -5.06 | -4.79 |
| Pernod Ricard | 64.50 | -3.10 | -4.59 |
| Orange | 15.10 | -0.86 | -4.19 |
| Credit Agricole | 18.25 | -0.76 | -3.97 |
| Country | Index | Latest | Previous |
| Norway | Oslo All-Share | 2476.80 | 2479.48 |
| Pakistan | KSE 100 | 177322.77 | 177370.71 |
| Philippines | Manila Comp | 6804.58 | 6137.23 |
| Poland | Wig | 130504.38 | 135418.20 |
| Portugal | P3 20 | 9389.24 | 9445.39 |
| Portugal | PSI General | 6365.01 | 6410.86 |
| Romania | Romania BET Index | 35457.73 | 35896.58 |
| Russia | Russia Traded Index in USD | 988.10 | 988.10 |
| Saudi Arabia | TADAMUL All Share Index | 11237.93 | 11259.90 |
| Singapore | FTSE Sense Times | 5688.12 | 5721.59 |
| Slovakia | SAL 20 | 325.90 | 325.80 |
| Slovenia | SIB TOP | 3312.73 | 3191.95 |
| South Africa | FTSE/JSE All Share | 116806.24 | 116813.45 |
| South Africa | FTSE/JSE Res | 75324.43 | 75680.77 |
| South Africa | FTSE/JSE Top 40 | 159323.09 | 159497.56 |
| South Korea | Korea | 6912.27 | 6938.21 |
| South Korea | Koqo 200 | 1088.61 | 1071.16 |
| Spain | Spain BEX 35 | 19881.81 | 20067.30 |
| Company Name | Price | change | change/% |
| Ups | |||
| Halfords Group | 2.67 | 0.26 | 10.79 |
| Computacenter | 56.25 | 4.10 | 7.86 |
| Atalaya Mining Copper | 11.00 | 0.43 | 4.07 |
| The Sage Grp | 11.04 | 0.41 | 3.81 |
| Oakley Capital Investments | 5.44 | 0.18 | 3.42 |
| Downs | |||
| PPHE Hotel Group | 15.26 | -1.14 | -6.95 |
| ZOGUP | 4.35 | -0.27 | 5.74 |
| Genuit Group | 2.80 | -0.12 | -4.12 |
| DRI Martens | 0.77 | -0.03 | -3.73 |
| Estein | 5.11 | -0.19 | -3.66 |
UK MARKET WINNERS & LOSERS
| price | change | change% | |
| Ups | |||
| Salesforce Inc | 248.58 | 42.95 | 20.89 |
| CrowdStrike Hldgs | 220.95 | 31.77 | 16.79 |
| Palo Alto Networks | 379.00 | 39.70 | 11.70 |
| Synopsys | 455.98 | 45.98 | 11.21 |
| Nvidia | 228.52 | 18.85 | 9.00 |
| Dowas | |||
| HP Inc | 28.98 | -1.53 | -5.03 |
| Western Digital | 449.86 | -19.02 | -4.05 |
| Best Buy | 84.00 | -3.44 | -3.93 |
| Dollar Tree | 127.22 | -4.96 | -3.76 |
| Micron Technology | 911.77 | -26.62 | -2.64 |
| price | change | change% | |
| Ups | |||
| Furukawa Electric | 4089.00 | 184.00 | 4.71 |
| Fujikura | 5500.00 | 195.00 | 3.68 |
| Mitsubishi Chemical | 1171.00 | 39.00 | 3.45 |
| IHI | 2720.00 | 82.00 | 3.11 |
| Kuraray Co | 1828.00 | 47.00 | 2.64 |
| Dowes | |||
| Advantest | 34610.00 | -1090.00 | -3.05 |
| Ebara | 4821.00 | -138.00 | -2.78 |
| Yamaha Motor | 1906.50 | -48.50 | -2.48 |
| Dentsu Group | 3535.00 | -83.00 | -2.29 |
| Konami Group | 21735.00 | -505.00 | -2.27 |
| FTSE 100 | price(E) | % Chg week | % Chg ytd |
| Winners | |||
| Computacenter | 56.25 | 11.50 | 91.98 |
| Antofagasta | 40.39 | 8.99 | 23.18 |
| JCI Sports Fashion | 0.86 | 7.94 | 2.34 |
| IG Group | 13.94 | 7.07 | 6.01 |
| Anglo American | 42.43 | 6.98 | 37.54 |
| Melrose Ind | 5.09 | 6.87 | -13.49 |
| Halma | 36.72 | 5.64 | 3.79 |
| Endeavour | 47.39 | 5.40 | 22.39 |
| Lon Stock Ex | 89.80 | 5.13 | 0.31 |
| Lion Finance | 133.60 | 4.62 | 43.66 |
\$ per £
¥ per \$
Day 1.13% Month 2.55% Year 4.11%

| Country | Index | Latest | Previous |
| Sweden | DMX Stockholm 30 | 3321.44 | 3326.34 |
| Sweden | DMX Stockholm AS | 1151.01 | 1148.74 |
| Switzerland | SNI Index | 14384.37 | 14542.90 |
| Taiwan | Weighted Stock Index | 45875.22 | 45832.62 |
| Thailand | Bovespa & S1 | 1900.78 | 1865.10 |
| Turkey | BIST 100 | 14575.51 | 14610.92 |
| UK | FTSE 100 | 10792.54 | 10878.12 |
| UK | FTSE 4Good UK | 9386.55 | 9458.01 |
| UK | FTSE All Share | 5826.09 | 5866.59 |
| UK | FTSE Non-MAX 100 | 9698.04 | 9505.20 |
| U.S.A. | DJ US$ Composite | 16934.98 | 16944.60 |
| U.S.A. | DJ Jones Industrial | 53676.08 | 53483.88 |
| U.S.A. | DJ Jones Transport | 21524.22 | 21583.06 |
| U.S.A. | DJ Jones Utilities | 425.47 | 428.24 |
| U.S.A. | Nasdaq 100 | 29483.15 | 29224.52 |
| U.S.A. | Nasdaq Composite | 26474.25 | 26130.20 |
| U.S.A. | NYSE Composite | 24633.37 | 24142.07 |
| U.S.A. | S&P 500 | 7737.99 | 7675.70 |
| FTSE 250 | price(E) | % Chg week | % Chg ytd |
| Winners | |||
| Gamma Communications | 11.56 | 18.24 | 25.11 |
| Atalaya Mining Copper | 11.00 | 17.08 | 28.66 |
| Halfords Group | 2.67 | 14.35 | 89.63 |
| Vistry Group | 3.03 | 13.74 | -52.76 |
| Hochschild Mining | 6.72 | 12.48 | 30.96 |
| Oxford Nanopore Technologies | 1.81 | 10.15 | 41.12 |
| ME Group | 1.28 | 8.29 | -15.23 |
| Domino's Pizza | 2.11 | 8.00 | 21.45 |
| International Workplace Gp | 1.89 | 7.59 | -18.54 |
| Hays | 0.73 | 7.50 | 29.94 |
Day ▷ -0.70% Month ▷ 0.13% Year ▷ -3.93%
| Country | Index | Latest | Previous |
| Venezuela | IBC | 5702.51 | 5690.10 |
| Vietnam | Viet Nam Index | 1831.56 | 1821.32 |
| Cross Border | Euro Stoxx 50 (Eur) | 6424.73 | 6470.74 |
| Netherlands | Eurofirst 100 (D) | 1912.90 | 1937.01 |
| Cross-Border | FTSE 4Good Global ($) | 21527.12 | 21354.07 |
| Cross-Border | FTSE All World ($) | 760.79 | 757.17 |
| Cross-Border | FTSE E300 | 2602.39 | 2621.97 |
| Cross-Border | FTSE Eurotop 100 | 9030.15 | 9073.84 |
| Cross-Border | FTSE Global 100 ($) | 5771.56 | 5711.87 |
| Cross-Border | FTSE Gold Min ($) | 8589.94 | 8589.94 |
| Cross-Border | FTSE Latibex Tap (Eur) | 8118.10 | 6134.70 |
| Cross-Border | FTSE World ($) | 1420.82 | 1413.55 |
| Cross-Border | FTSEurofirst 100 (Eur) | 7195.46 | 7252.36 |
| Cross-Border | FTSEurofirst 80 (Eur) | 8733.25 | 8796.98 |

| FTSE Small Cap | price(£) | % Chg week | % Chg ytd |
| Winners | |||
| Geiger Counter | 0.72 | 16.13 | 20.00 |
| PensionBee Group | 1.36 | 8.33 | -15.74 |
| PureTech Health | 1.26 | 7.98 | 0.80 |
| ASOS | 4.17 | 7.19 | 47.27 |
| M J Gleason | 2.77 | 6.13 | -34.05 |
| Essentra | 1.11 | 5.89 | 15.32 |
| C&C Group | 0.95 | 5.64 | -29.26 |
| Dialight | 5.66 | 4.81 | 61.71 |
| DFS Furniture | 1.85 | 4.76 | -5.17 |
| Baring Emerging Europe | 9.00 | 4.65 | 15.02 |
CURRENCIES
| Industry Sectors | price(E) | %Chg week | %Chg ytd |
| Winners | |||
| Finance & Credit Services | 14422.01 | 4.89 | -0.41 |
| Precious Metals & Mining | 38868.71 | 4.76 | 12.58 |
| Electronic & Electrical Equip | 15105.91 | 4.26 | 18.49 |
| Industrial Metals & Mining | 10088.71 | 4.23 | 35.96 |
| Biotechnology | 21903.53 | 4.19 | -0.59 |
| Basic Materials | 11142.88 | 4.13 | 32.54 |
| Real Estate Investment & Svcs | 2062.53 | 3.35 | -3.70 |
| Hhold Goods & Home Carst | 8709.69 | 3.27 | -19.25 |
| Software & Computer Svcs | 1945.36 | 3.19 | -4.73 |
| Technology | 1702.58 | 3.16 | -4.48 |
| Aug 27 | CLONDAR | EURO | POUND | ||||||
| Closing Mid | Day's Change | Closing Mid | Day's Change | Closing Mid | Day's Change | Closing Mid | Day's Change | ||
| Argentina Pasto | 1514.1764 | -0.0629 | 13.9504 | 1783.4298 | 32.4845 | 32.4845 | 2056.6301 | -0.9939 | |
| Brazilian Real | 1.3570 | -0.0052 | -0.0133 | 1.6104 | -0.0059 | -0.0059 | 1.8885 | -0.0077 | |
| Bahraini Dinar | 0.3770 | 0.4380 | 0.0036 | 0.0036 | 0.5211 | ||||
| Bolivian Boliviano | 11.1700 | -0.1100 | 0.1610 | 13.8724 | -0.0620 | -0.0620 | 15.9501 | -0.1295 | |
| Brazilian Sint Ma | 5.1750 | 0.0086 | -0.0190 | 6.1183 | 0.1383 | 0.1383 | 8.0584 | 0.0844 | |
| Canadian Dollar | 1.3861 | -0.0021 | 0.0390 | 1.6142 | -0.0036 | -0.0041 | 1.8050 | -0.0050 | |
| Chilean Peso | 921.8080 | 113.6380 | 11.6920 | 1085.5158 | 22.2710 | 22.2710 | 211.2963 | 21.5494 | |
| Chinese Yuan | 6.7199 | -0.0251 | -0.0251 | 7.8351 | 0.0246 | 0.0246 | 9.1273 | 0.0085 | |
| Colombian Peso | 3193.1330 | 26.4300 | 26.4500 | 3689.6470 | 60.4783 | 60.4783 | 4778.8643 | 45.1333 | |
| Brazilian Real | 452.2400 | 1.2230 | 1.2250 | 5.0984 | 1.7031 | 1.7031 | 5.9296 | 4.4194 | |
| Czech Krona | 23.1414 | -0.2812 | -0.2812 | 24.1240 | -0.1280 | -0.1280 | 33.1553 | -0.2567 | |
| Colinian Peso | 6.4140 | -0.0012 | 0.0018 | 5.7974 | -0.0013 | -0.0013 | 7.1175 | -0.0035 | |
| Egyptian Pound | 50.2700 | 0.3700 | 0.3700 | 58.5211 | 0.9049 | 0.9049 | 56.8623 | 0.8144 | |
| Hong Kong Dollar | 7.8394 | 0.0007 | 0.0037 | 9.1397 | 0.0017 | -0.0038 | 10.6479 | -0.0038 | |
| Indian Rupee | 13.2100 | -2.1226 | -2.1226 | 17.9650 | -0.5250 | -0.5250 | 14.7715 | -0.9116 | |
| Indian Peso | 95.5463 | 0.1397 | 0.1669 | 111.2732 | 0.5147 | -0.5533 | 729.1776 | 0.7117 | |
FTSE ACTUARIES SHARE INDICES
| Change | Dollars | EUR | POUND | ||||||||
| Day's Change | Closing Mid | Day's Change | Week's Change | Day's Change | Day's Change | Week's Change | Closing Mid | Day's Change | Week's Change | Change | |
| 14.2930 | Indonesian Real Estate | 17720.0000 | 20.0000 | -22.5000 | 2836.7210 | 1271.9110 | 1271.9110 | 24068.1910 | 15.5450 | -119.2730 | |
| -0.0251 | Israelan Islands | 2.9600 | -0.0100 | -0.0302 | 2.4540 | -0.0156 | -0.0461 | -0.0241 | -0.0251 | -0.0500 | |
| -0.0000 | Japanese Yen | 159.3300 | -0.0800 | 0.6000 | 185.5441 | -0.0952 | 0.1026 | 216.3964 | -0.2543 | 0.0213 | |
| -0.1296 | Kunihiro Branch | 129.4000 | - | - | 150.6900 | 1.2294 | 1.2294 | 175.7576 | 0.8088 | 0.8088 | |
| -0.0027 | Kuwaiti Dinar | 0.3088 | - | 0.0000 | 0.3200 | -0.0003 | -0.0003 | -0.0004 | -0.0003 | -0.0003 | |
| -0.0340 | Malaysan Rupiah | 4.6330 | 0.0070 | -0.0110 | 4.8968 | -0.0261 | -0.0261 | 5.4779 | 0.0072 | -0.0051 | |
| -0.0000 | Morocco Peso | 4.5255 | -0.0025 | -0.0179 | 19.7629 | -0.0450 | -0.0450 | -0.0502 | -0.0158 | -0.0051 | |
| 0.0080 | New Zealand Dollar | 1.6914 | -0.0037 | 1.0011 | 1.9567 | -0.0042 | -0.0050 | 2.2837 | -0.0060 | -0.0069 | |
| 99.3887 | Nigeria Naira | 1045.0750 | -21.7300 | -21.7300 | 1560.6155 | -12.3686 | -12.3686 | 1803.1573 | -21.0304 | -21.0304 | |
| -0.0000 | Peru Malaya | 9.3525 | -0.0250 | -0.1879 | 10.8179 | -0.0231 | -0.0318 | 12.8731 | -0.0251 | -0.0251 | |
| -0.2507 | Pakistan Rupee | 277.4250 | -0.3000 | -0.0500 | 323.0882 | -0.3355 | -0.3987 | 376.8712 | -0.5742 | -1.4553 | |
| -0.0000 | Philippines Sun Srl | 2.3020 | -0.0250 | -0.0323 | 3.3949 | 0.0062 | 0.0062 | 1.8947 | -0.0047 | -0.0047 | |
| 0.8144 | Philippine Paraguay | 61.8875 | 0.2250 | 0.2250 | 72.0883 | 1.9176 | 1.9176 | 84.0525 | 0.2887 | -0.0305 | |
| -0.0443 | Polish Zloty | 3.7251 | -0.0005 | -0.0005 | 4.3347 | 0.0348 | 0.0348 | 5.0655 | 0.0225 | 0.0225 | |
| -0.0000 | Peru Grenada | 4.5510 | -0.0250 | -0.0250 | 5.2998 | 0.0103 | 0.0103 | 1.2918 | -0.0001 | -0.0001 | |
| -0.7553 | Russian Ruble | 99.4500 | 3.8000 | 3.8000 | 100.6214 | 5.2101 | 5.2101 | 117.3529 | 5.6776 | 5.6776 | |
| £ Strng Aug 27 | Day's chg% | Euro Index | £ Strng Aug 26 | £ Strng Aug 25 | Year ago yield | Div Cover | P/E ratio | XDJ adj. % | Total Return | |
| FTSE 100 (100) | 1079.84 | -0.31 | 309.74 | 1059.76 | 3562.48 | 3251.79 | 3.09 | 25.09 | 15.88 | 87.16 |
| FTSE 100 ex Investment Trusts (6) | 3531.05 | -0.81 | 3309.74 | 24987.64 | 24965.05 | 24741.38 | 3.06 | 25.54 | 12.86 | 547.46 |
| FTSE 250 (250) | 24889.86 | 0.00 | 22633.16 | 24987.64 | 24965.05 | 24741.38 | 3.06 | 25.54 | 12.86 | 547.46 |
| FTSE 350 ex Inv Co (104) | 23683.66 | -0.07 | 23573.62 | 25911.51 | 23683.29 | 23306.14 | 3.07 | 18.68 | 19.66 | 2926.69 |
| FTSE 500 ex Inv Co (104) | 5884.00 | -0.01 | 5884.00 | 5884.00 | 5884.00 | 5884.00 | 3.07 | 18.68 | 19.66 | 2926.69 |
| FTSE 350 ex Investment Trusts (209) | 5621.25 | -0.75 | 5291.54 | 5685.15 | 5688.43 | 5351.90 | 3.09 | 20.55 | 15.75 | 702.31 |
| FTSE 350 High Yield (13) | 5153.63 | -1.27 | 4803.94 | 5263.00 | 5255.89 | 4626.85 | 4.24 | 15.22 | 12.26 | 143.89 |
| FTSE 350 Mid-Cap Growth (1) | 5983.40 | -0.01 | 5983.40 | 5983.40 | 5983.40 | 5983.40 | 3.09 | 18.68 | 19.66 | 143.89 |
| FTSE SmallCap (18) | 6233.34 | 0.08 | 4944.14 | 6226.69 | 6221.27 | 7537.89 | 3.79 | 14.53 | 28.50 | 192.67 |
| FTSE SmallCap ex Co (to Inc 2) | 6707.67 | 0.18 | 6154.56 | 6756.19 | 6768.43 | 6306.69 | 3.58 | 65.98 | 47.77 | 142.64 |
| FTSE SmallCap financing inc ex Co (12) | 156.23 | 0.00 | 148.56 | 156.23 | 155.60 | 150.06 | 5.05 | 15.00 | 12.71 | 50.29 |
| FTSE SmallCap ex Ltd (1) | 5950.00 | -0.01 | 5950.00 | 5950.00 | 5950.00 | 5950.00 | 3.09 | 14.53 | 18.50 | 149.31 |
| FTSE All Share ex Co (to US 29) | 5714.44 | -0.74 | 5194.45 | 5757.18 | 5763.08 | 5253.92 | 3.09 | 25.04 | 15.82 | 139.88 |
| FTSE Fledg (19) | 12654.85 | 1.48 | 11503.33 | 12486.57 | 12496.94 | 12562.63 | 5.23 | -24.21 | -1.46 | 206.31 |
| FTSE All Share ex Japan (1) | 16737.88 | -0.23 | 16737.88 | 16737.88 | 16737.88 | 16737.88 | 3.23 | -24.21 | -1.46 | 206.31 |
| FTSE All Share (22) | 5767.23 | 0.11 | 5187.89 | 5701.14 | 5697.20 | 5246.47 | 3.82 | 15.01 | 25.86 | 134.41 |
| FTSE All Share ex Eq Co (122) | 5279.12 | 0.23 | 4619.94 | 5087.35 | 5087.05 | 4745.49 | 3.61 | 6.43 | 13.74 | 108.24 |
| FTSE All Share ex Eq Co (1) | 817.33 | 0.01 | 797.33 | 817.33 | 817.33 | 817.33 | 3.61 | 6.43 | 13.74 | 108.24 |
| FTSE All Share Technology (20) | 20591.31 | 3.07 | 1881.92 | 2038.60 | 2037.67 | 2154.29 | 2.38 | 18.61 | 23.24 | 46.10 |
| FTSE All Share Vascularizations (5) | 2117.50 | -0.12 | 1924.81 | 2131.04 | 2121.18 | 1838.12 | 3.33 | 28.80 | 37.63 | 41.30 |
| FTSE All Share Health Care (1) | 16400.59 | -1.27 | 14808.19 | 16610.97 | 16619.10 | 17187.22 | 2.41 | 23.38 | 17.39 | 265.09 |
| FTSE All Share Health Care (2) | 8714.79 | -0.34 | 8399.99 | 9079.99 | 9079.99 | 9079.99 | 2.41 | 23.38 | 17.39 | 265.09 |
| FTSE All Share Real Estate (40) | 828.96 | -0.95 | 788.28 | 836.89 | 837.49 | 779.49 | 4.70 | 11.15 | 18.48 | 20.87 |
| FTSE All Share Consumer Discretionary (8) | 6133.26 | -0.36 | 5075.16 | 6155.72 | 6160.26 | 5697.31 | 2.51 | 15.96 | 20.29 | 115.56 |
| FTSE All Share Consumer Discretionary (2) | 10954.69 | -0.44 | 10444.44 | 11044.69 | 11044.69 | 10954.69 | 2.51 | 15.96 | 20.29 | 115.56 |
| FTSE All Share Industry (19) | 17223.69 | -0.32 | 15174.06 | 17248.67 | 17214.94 | 10288.61 | 1.48 | 27.27 | 32.79 | 151.88 |
| FTSE All Share Basic Materials (2) | 12045.81 | 0.25 | 10925.12 | 12018.61 | 12025.29 | 9108.69 | 2.43 | 20.55 | 20.11 | 179.83 |
| FTSE All Share Energy (13) | 10278.78 | -0.32 | 8836.96 | 10565.89 | 10565.89 | 8861.74 | 2.55 | 23.55 | 21.32 | 154.07 |
| FTSE All Share Energy Services (1) | 10992.69 | -0.32 | 10992.69 | 10992.69 | 10992.69 | 8861.74 | 2.55 | 23.55 | 21.32 | 154.07 |
| FTSE All Share Software & Computer Services (1) | 2243.30 | 3.09 | 2038.17 | 2176.07 | 2207.60 | 2341.56 | 2.40 | 18.11 | 23.06 | 50.34 |
| FTSE All Share Network Hardware & Equipment (2) | 3595.91 | 0.55 | 3269.33 | 3561.73 | 3606.77 | 2276.41 | 0.00 | 1301.03 | 0.00 | 509.37 |
| FTSE All Share Network Hardware & Equipment (3) | 3200.00 | 0.00 | 3200.00 | 3200.00 | 3200.00 | 2276.41 | 0.00 | 1301.03 | 0.00 | 509.37 |
| FTSE All Share Health Care Providers (2) | 11154.20 | -0.30 | 10139.21 | 11167.97 | 11191.62 | 8413.29 | 1.04 | 17.79 | 53.51 | 28.78 |
| FTSE All Share Medical Equipment & Services (2) | 5460.70 | 0.38 | 4863.80 | 5429.93 | 5439.06 | 6152.00 | 2.62 | 21.13 | 17.92 | 1557.27 |
| FTSE All Share Medical Devices & Services (2) | 2356.60 | -0.34 | 2356.60 | 2356.60 | 2356.60 | 2356.60 | 2.62 | 21.13 | 17.92 | 1557.27 |
| FTSE All Share Banks (13) | 9219.26 | 1.44 | 8306.34 | 9353.53 | 8308.46 | 7620.31 | 3.59 | 26.61 | 10.68 | 303.15 |
| FTSE All Share Finance & Services (1) | 12441.74 | 3.16 | 11308.59 | 12060.11 | 12238.18 | 12525.31 | 1.97 | 18.77 | 22.05 | 1447.98 |
| FTSE All Share Banking & Brokerage Services (2) | 13526.94 | 0.06 | 12351.81 | 13537.79 | 13593.61 | 13257.98 | 2.66 | 9.90 | 365.77 | 2236.89 |
| FTSE All Share Life Insurance (1) | 15647.74 | -0.34 | 15647.74 | 15647.74 | 15647.74 | 15647.74 | 2.66 | 9.90 | 365.77 | 2236.89 |
| FTSE All Share Life Insurance (5) | 8443.15 | -1.23 | 7674.85 | 8548.65 | 8526.26 | 8254.18 | 4.73 | 11.91 | 17.85 | 304.68 |
| FTSE All Share Insurance (3) | 6888.27 | -0.49 | 6244.19 | 6883.21 | 6880.69 | 5171.05 | 3.92 | 12.55 | 20.35 | 176.39 |
| FTSE All Share Real Estate Investment Trusts (3) | 12687.44 | -0.44 | 12687.44 | 12687.44 | 12687.44 | 12687.44 | 3.92 | 12.55 | 20.35 | 176.39 |
| FTSE All Share Real Estate Investment Trusts (3) | 2088.23 | -1.21 | 1692.76 | 2107.64 | 2108.24 | 1926.13 | 5.07 | 17.10 | 17.88 | 362.83 |
| FTSE All Share Automotive Parts (5) | 858.28 | 0.82 | 768.18 | 865.41 | 883.74 | 1437.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.76 | 581.44 |
| FTSE All Share Consumer Services (1) | 3703.40 | 1.38 | 3063.71 | 3850.04 | 3725.19 | 3889.56 | 2.28 | 17.77 | 24.82 | 82.26 |
| FTSE All Share Consumer Goods (1) | 7159.88 | -0.44 | 6779.98 | 7159.88 | 7159.88 | 7159.88 | 2.28 | 17.77 | 24.82 | 82.26 |
| FTSE All Share Leisure Goods (2) | 46068.56 | -2.36 | 41892.83 | 47201.80 | 46250.78 | 47968.76 | 2.35 | 16.22 | 26.27 | 1017.36 |
| FTSE All Share Financial Goods (3) | 15284.49 | -0.88 | 13863.91 | 15426.35 | 15172.23 | 15672.83 | 3.25 | 11.75 | 34.37 | 37.60 |
| FTSE All Share Real Estate Investment Trusts (3) | 12687.44 | -0.88 | 12687.44 | 12687.44 | 12687.44 | 12687.44 | 3.25 | 11.75 | 34.37 | 37.60 |
| FTSE All Share Retailers (19) | 2847.98 | -0.77 | 2568.83 | 2670.03 | 2651.43 | 2591.68 | 2.61 | 27.77 | 13.82 | 51.32 |
| FTSE All Share Retailers (4) | 10240.93 | -0.30 | 9006.55 | 10333.13 | 10292.68 | 9662.99 | 1.87 | 19.11 | 34.71 | 1185.34 |
| FTSE All Share Construction Services (1) | 11711.44 | -0.44 | 10749.94 | 11711.44 | 11711.44 | 11711.44 | 2.61 | 19.11 | 34.71 | 1185.34 |
| FTSE All Share Food Products (1) | 8160.49 | -0.31 | 7417.92 | 8169.16 | 8153.23 | 7556.92 | 2.65 | 20.44 | 18.47 | 115.21 |
| FTSE All Share Tobacco (2) | 4506.28 | -1.26 | 40963.81 | 45944.68 | 44895.90 | 47515.96 | 5.96 | 13.31 | 128.84 | 1485.54 |
| FTSE All Share Construction Materials & Equipment (1) | 16199.83 | -0.54 | 14724.80 | 16286.67 | 16219.99 | 14300.59 | 2.69 | 22.33 | 16.69 | 301.66 |
| FTSE All Share Construction Materials & Equipment (2) | 17779.93 | -0.55 | 16076.97 | 17779.93 | 17779.93 | 16076.97 | 2.69 | 22.33 | 16.69 | 301.66 |
| FTSE All Share Electronics & Electrical Equip (1) | 17759.93 | 0.55 | 16076.97 | 17543.15 | 17380.59 | 14821.05 | 0.90 | 33.62 | 16.74 | 1322.24 |
| FTSE All Share General Industrials (8) | 6029.00 | 0.21 | 5448.44 | 6076.52 | 5885.74 | 5275.72 | 2.15 | 18.11 | 25.70 | 81.60 |
| FTSE All Share Industrial Equipment (3) | 13787.93 | -0.44 | 12487.44 | 13787.93 | 13787.93 | 12677.93 | 2.15 | 18.11 | 25.70 | 81.60 |
| FTSE All Share Industrial Support Services (2) | 10769.93 | 0.66 | 9862.64 | 10713.23 | 10247.12 | 10512.10 | 2.13 | 14.69 | 39.21 | 15306.49 |
| FTSE All Share Industrial Transportation (7) | 6668.99 | -1.69 | 6082.14 | 6783.56 | 6786.63 | 5995.94 | 4.08 | 17.74 | 23.84 | 725.74 |
| FTSE All Share Precious Metals & Mining (1) | 36779.72 | 0.16 | 32422.77 | 38314.89 | 38371.88 | 32689.13 | 2.21 | 19.89 | 15.16 | 6335.65 |
| FTSE All Share Real Estate Investment Trusts (3) | 8700.00 | -0.55 | 8000.00 | 9000.00 | 9000.00 | 8000.00 | 2.21 | 19.89 | 15.16 | 6335.65 |
| FTSE All Share Oil & Gas (12) | 10472.55 | -1.83 | 9519.59 | 10854.68 | 10718.00 | 8705.65 | 3.98 | 25.09 | 103.08 | 3045.05 |
| FTSE All Share Alternative Energy (1) | 18.86 | 0.15 | 18.89 | 18.83 | 19.19 | 9.94 | 0.00 | -17.33 | 0.00 | 19.86 |
| FTSE All Share Energy & Power (2) | 13887.44 | -0.44 | 12487.44 | 13887.44 | 13887.44 | 12487.44 | -0.44 | -17.33 | 0.00 | 19.86 |
| FTSE All Share Financial Services ex Co (6) | 215.46 | -0.95 | 204.89 | 217.52 | 216.95 | 190.33 | 3.63 | 23.88 | 11.60 | 6,76 |
FTSE SECTORS: LEADERS & LAGGARDS
| Year to date percentage changes | |
| Techn Hardware & Equip | 94.71 |
| Alternative Energy | 89.77 |
| Industrial Metals & Mining | 35.36 |
| Nonlife Insurance | 32.68 |
| Health Care Providers | 32.58 |
| Basic Materials | 32.54 |
| Aerospace & Defense | 25.55 |
| Energy | 20.23 |
| Oil & Gas & Coal | 29.14 |
| Electronic & Electrical Equip | 18.49 |
| Banks | 17.89 |
| Industrials | 16.87 |
| Telecomms Sec Providers | 15.26 |
| Telecommunications | 15.20 |
| Construction & Materials | 14.56 |
| General Industrials | 14.33 |
| Chemicals | 13.52 |
| Financials and Ins Co. | 13.73 |
| Financials | 12.90 |
FTSE GLOBAL INDICES
| Aug 27 | DOLLAR | EURO | POUND | ||||||
| Closing Mid | Day's Change | Week's Change | Closing Mid | Day's Change | Week's Change | Closing Mid | Day's Change | Week's Change | |
| Saudi Riyal | 3.7546 | -- | -0.0001 | 4.3726 | 0.0002 | -0.0147 | 5.0957 | -0.0022 | -0.0189 |
| Singapore Dollar | 1.2713 | -0.0003 | -0.0003 | 1.4906 | -0.0006 | -0.0051 | 1.7584 | -0.0017 | -0.0071 |
| Thai Baht | 0.6886 | 0.0290 | -- | 1.6320 | 0.0342 | -- | 1.7201 | -0.0177 | -0.1131 |
| South Korean Won | 1305.6000 | -4.1000 | -12.5000 | 1697.8468 | -30.3738 | -30.3738 | 1875.2000 | -6.3987 | -23.3302 |
| Sri Lanka | 5.5102 | -0.0177 | -0.0041 | 11.0651 | -0.0201 | -0.0042 | 11.9295 | -0.0291 | -0.0032 |
| Swiss Franc | 8.8038 | -0.0024 | -0.0003 | 9.5902 | -0.0027 | -0.0032 | 13.0916 | -0.0037 | -0.0032 |
| Taiwan Dinar | 31.5605 | -0.7255 | -0.3456 | 36.8951 | -0.3038 | -0.3038 | 43.0301 | -0.2252 | -0.5735 |
| Thai Baht | 32.8785 | 0.1275 | 0.0052 | 38.3928 | 0.1501 | 0.0052 | 44.6894 | 0.1525 | -0.1168 |
| Tunisian Dinar | 2.9019 | -0.0221 | -0.0221 | 3.3798 | 0.0021 | -0.0021 | 3.9415 | -0.0117 | -0.0117 |
| Turkish Lira | 48.1350 | 0.4340 | -0.4240 | 58.5931 | 0.9471 | 2.9417 | 65.3794 | 0.8742 | 0.8742 |
| UAE Dirham | 3.8275 | -0.0003 | -- | 4.2714 | -- | -- | 4.9166 | -0.0024 | -0.0184 |
| Pound Sterling | 0.7262 | 0.0003 | -0.0027 | 0.8575 | 0.0004 | -0.0004 | 1.0005 | -- | -- |
| United States Dollar | 1.0000 | 1.1645 | -0.0037 | 1.2622 | -0.0036 | -0.0035 | |||
| Switzerland Dinar | 260.0000 | -60.0000 | -60.0000 | 302.9319 | 178.5961 | 178.5961 | 1,643.1500 | 81.9140 | 81.9140 |
| Euro | 0.8597 | -0.0028 | 1.0003 | -- | 1.1683 | -0.0005 | -0.0005 | ||
| Aug. 26 Regions & countries | No of stocks | US$ Indices | Daily %Chg | Month %Chg | YTD %Chg | YTD %Stor | YTD %Fitch | Gr Div Yield |
| FTSE Global Indices | ||||||||
| United States | 10115 | 12698.60 | 5.05 | 4.13 | 13.38 | 2192.16 | 14.73 | 1.59 |
| Global Large Cap | 1870 | 11868.65 | -0.05 | 4.24 | 12.76 | 2158.39 | 14.00 | 1.50 |
| Global Mid Cap | 2294 | 11901.30 | -1.30 | 4.24 | 12.76 | 2158.39 | 14.00 | 1.85 |
| Global Small Cap | 5851 | 14274.23 | 0.24 | 4.46 | 14.68 | 2283.49 | 16.00 | 1.71 |
| Global ex Europezone | 8501 | 13448.88 | 0.06 | 4.08 | 13.60 | 2282.29 | 14.94 | 1.50 |
| Global wi UNITED | 7584 | 4203.63 | -0.01 | 4.00 | 13.38 | 2091.14 | 13.54 | 1.50 |
| Global ex US | 8564 | 8351.12 | -0.14 | 4.95 | 14.83 | 2063.68 | 17.01 | 2.39 |
| Global wi Mid Cap | 9884 | 13077.07 | 0.01 | 4.95 | 14.83 | 2063.68 | 17.01 | 14.77 |
| Global ex Japan | 8759 | 13237.33 | 0.03 | 4.08 | 13.11 | 2039.88 | 14.45 | 1.57 |
| FTSE Regional Indices | ||||||||
| Asia Pacific | 1980 | 17521.16 | -0.05 | 3.68 | 12.59 | 2752.93 | 13.49 | 1.19 |
| Asia Pacific ex Japan | 8323 | 9308.98 | 0.58 | 5.43 | 18.54 | 1670.61 | 21.21 | 1.96 |
| 4857 | 17418.70 | 0.25 | 4.59 | 18.54 | 1730.58 | 21.68 | 1.98 | |
| Europe | 1452 | 1233.36 | -0.20 | 4.34 | 10.27 | 1565.30 | 13.04 | 2.77 |
| Europe ex UK | 1221 | 836.99 | -0.15 | 4.59 | 10.08 | 1738.78 | 2.31 | 2.88 |
| Japan | 614 | 534.32 | -0.05 | 4.59 | 10.08 | 1698.87 | 2.89 | 2.89 |
| AIG Developed Index | ||||||||
| Developed | 3359 | 17317.87 | -0.02 | 4.05 | 13.66 | 2248.40 | 14.50 | 1.50 |
| Developed ex North America | 3508 | 787.99 | 0.03 | 4.80 | 16.50 | 1587.22 | 18.86 | 2.44 |
| Aug. 26 Jan | No of stocks | US$ Indices | Daily %Chg | Month %Chg | YTD %Chg | US$ YTD %Chg | Gr Div Yield | |
| Dec. 26 Jan | 10115 | 12698.60 | -0.05 | 4.13 | 13.38 | 2192.16 | 14.73 | |
| Digital Information Services | |||||||
| Telecom & Computer Services | 3527.49 | -0.01 | 14.00 | -1.75 | -6293.14 | -1.32 | 0.57 |
| Media | 183 845.52 | -0.93 | 12.29 | -7.35 | -1212.49 | -6.74 | 0.93 |
| Technology | |||||||
| Smartphones | 283 810.08 | -0.21 | -0.23 | 39.49 | 851.87 | 39.93 | 0.57 |
| Tech Hardware & Equip | 883 6769.82 | 0.35 | -1.16 | 26.92 | 9576.94 | 40.03 | 0.56 |
| Technology | 1231 4833.63 | 0.21 | 4.11 | 20.28 | 8331.86 | 20.76 | 0.57 |
| Consumer Goods | 123 100.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | -0.00 | 121.24 | -0.00 | 0.00 |
| Telecommunications Equipment | 114 565.23 | 1.91 | 8.14 | 68.07 | 8533.03 | 70.16 | 0.78 |
| Telecommunications | 255 927.65 | -0.05 | -0.00 | -0.00 | 182.21 | -0.00 | 0.00 |
| Telecommunications Svcs Providers | 145 454.31 | -0.18 | 5.65 | 3.61 | 1013.80 | 8.47 | 3.54 |
| Electronic & Electrical Equip | 344 217.17 | 0.68 | 4.13 | 24.63 | 3067.28 | 25.63 | 0.98 |
| Financials | |||||||
| Financials & Credit Services | 112 939.34 | -0.10 | 4.91 | -5.21 | 1471.99 | -4.09 | 1.50 |
| Financials | 1154 736.20 | 0.16 | 2.61 | 11.41 | 1324.56 | 13.90 | 2.71 |
| Homeowners & Rent | 113 183.59 | 0.00 | -0.00 | -0.00 | 1383.15 | -0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bank | 489 539.03 | -0.30 | 2.02 | 15.74 | 1257.13 | 18.73 | 3.21 |
| Other Insurance Inv & Insur Srvs | 9 103.03 | -0.01 | -0.00 | -0.00 | 103.03 | -0.01 | 0.00 |
| Nonlife Insurance | 125 1104.45 | 0.26 | 1.44 | 6.88 | 1591.21 | 8.64 | 2.63 |
| Inves Banking & Borrowings Grp | 344 1244.13 | -0.23 | 4.79 | 7.71 | 2084.02 | 9.06 | 1.58 |
| Real Estate & Commercial Servicing | 56 152.75 | -0.13 | 8.54 | 2.41 | 160.25 | 3.07 | 0.90 |
| Real Estate | |||||||
| Real Estate | 648 983.24 | -0.39 | -0.85 | 5.55 | 1175.50 | 8.07 | 3.65 |
| Real Estate & Commercial Servicing | 56 152.75 | -0.13 | 8.54 | 2.41 | 160.25 | 3.07 | 0.90 |
| Real Estate Investment Trusts | 319 772.38 | -0.48 | -2.33 | 9.91 | 1568.57 | 12.65 | 3.98 |
| Digital Information & Service | |||||||
| Consumer Digital Services | 98 330.07 | -0.65 | 4.76 | -1.43 | 324.49 | -1.22 | 0.34 |
| Consumer Discretionary | 1513 125.89 | -0.48 | 6.47 | -2.14 | 1778.53 | -1.36 | 1.18 |
| Consumer Staples | 1513 125.89 | -0.48 | 6.47 | -2.14 | 1778.53 | -1.36 | 1.18 |
| Consumer Staples | 821 101.96 | -0.12 | 2.00 | 6.69 | 1883.97 | -0.92 | 0.92 |
| Retailers | 267 197.71 | -0.35 | 5.63 | 4.38 | 2721.09 | 4.94 | 0.80 |
| Consumer Goods & Drug Stores | 1513 125.89 | -0.48 | 6.47 | -2.14 | 1778.53 | -1.36 | 1.18 |
| Personal Goods | 141 821.00 | -0.18 | 1.62 | -10.97 | 1271.77 | -9.83 | 2.03 |
| Personal Care | 1552 125.89 | -0.48 | 6.47 | -10.97 | 1271.77 | -9.83 | 2.03 |
| Travel & Leisure | 296 126.09 | -0.47 | 6.14 | 1.38 | 1807.07 | 2.41 | 1.54 |
Data provided by ICE. www.ice.com The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com
| 2.58 | Finance & Credit Services | -0.41 |
| 2.44 | Biotechnology | -0.59 |
| 1.23 | Consumer Staples | -1.21 |
| 8.75 | Personal Goods | -2.48 |
| 8.45 | Personal Care Drug & Oncology | -3.11 |
| 8.00 | Real Estate Investment & Svcs. | -3.70 |
| 6.92 | Leisure Goods | -3.82 |
| 6.11 | Technology | -4.48 |
| 5.62 | Software & Computer Svcs | -4.73 |
| 5.55 | Consumer Services | -5.07 |
| 4.38 | Tobacco | -5.16 |
| 4.00 | Pharmaceuticals & Biotech. | -7.68 |
| 2.86 | Health Care | -7.70 |
| 2.62 | Medical Equipment & Svcs. | -10.85 |
| 2.30 | HOLD Goods & Home Const. | -19.25 |
| 1.80 | Automobiles & Parts. | -40.31 |
| Avg No ofstocks | Index | US$ | Day'sChange | MonthQoQ | YTD%Chg | YTD%Chg | YTD%Chg | YTD%Chg | Div% |
| Regions & countries | |||||||||
| Emerging Europe | 5150 | 102.01 | 0.01 | 4.98 | 13.76 | -2.43 | 270.31 | 1.48 | 2.40 |
| Developed ex Europe | 4166 | 1537.48 | 0.01 | 4.00 | 14.36 | 24.368 | 15.35 | 1.27 | ... |
| Developed ex Eurozone | 4781 | 1489.05 | -0.02 | 4.00 | 13.94 | 233.08 | 15.10 | 1.39 | ... |
| Developed ex Japan | 3068 | 140.00 | 0.01 | 4.00 | 13.00 | 23.00 | 15.00 | 1.30 | ... |
| Developed ex UK | 5128 | 1436.67 | 0.01 | 4.07 | 13.77 | 234.12 | 15.06 | 1.44 | ... |
| Developed ex Europe | 4033 | 138.05 | -0.05 | 4.00 | 13.00 | 23.00 | 15.00 | 1.40 | ... |
| Developed Asia Pacific | 2318 | 859.37 | 1.33 | 5.82 | 26.26 | 1541.17 | 27.97 | 2.03 | ... |
| Developed ex Japan | 3822 | 146.96 | 0.36 | 5.82 | 26.00 | 1540.88 | 27.96 | 2.03 | ... |
| Developed ex Japan | 1193 | 740.69 | -0.22 | 4.30 | 10.01 | 1505.79 | 128.83 | 2.37 | ... |
| Developed ex UK | 982 | 809.14 | -0.16 | 4.54 | 9.80 | 1802.47 | 12.63 | 2.69 | ... |
| Developed ex Europe | 362 | 136.96 | 0.36 | 4.54 | 9.80 | 1802.47 | 12.63 | 2.69 | ... |
| Developed Asia Pac | 3511 | 189.88 | 0.02 | 4.96 | 16.49 | 1530.00 | 18.88 | 2.45 | ... |
| Emerging Indices | |||||||||
| Emerging Pacific | 4766 | 1102.15 | 0.71 | 4.88 | 10.96 | 2135.58 | 12.90 | 2.37 | ... |
| Emerging Europe | 4025 | 1256.24 | -0.91 | 4.88 | 10.96 | 2135.58 | 12.90 | 2.37 | ... |
| Emerging Japan | 259 | 379.94 | 0.52 | 6.56 | 23.96 | 862.72 | 25.74 | 2.48 | ... |
| Emerging Europe | 36 | 4802.56 | 1.16 | 11.82 | 28.59 | 6681.78 | 31.45 | 2.74 | ... |
| Emerging Japan | 155 | 337.57 | 0.17 | 6.56 | 23.96 | 6681.78 | 31.45 | 2.74 | ... |
| Emerging Plus Korea/Poland | 2721 | 5235.29 | 0.72 | 6.11 | 30.58 | 9686.65 | 32.65 | 2.05 | ... |
| Emerging Europe | 1231 | 510.07 | 1.07 | 6.11 | 30.58 | 9686.65 | 32.65 | 2.05 | ... |
| Secondary Energy | 3025 | 10272.73 | 0.37 | 3.81 | -7.03 | 1818.50 | -5.44 | 2.24 | ... |
FTSE 100 SUMMARY
| Aug 26 Sector | No of stocks | Index | Day's chg% | Month chg% | YTD %Chg | YTD %Chg | US $'s'001 | US $'s'002 | YTD % Chg | Div Yield |
| Holding Goods & Home Construction | 122 | 543.37 | -0.36 | 4.71 | 1.20 | 933.43 | 2.63 | 2.20 | - | - |
| Health Care | 15 | 180.69 | 0.79 | 1.11 | 1.46 | 1,463.85 | 1.43 | 1.40 | - | - |
| Health Care | 851 | 1214.68 | -0.84 | 1.82 | 9.51 | 1821.05 | 10.85 | 1.57 | - | - |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotech | 118 | 1827.75 | 0.80 | 2.00 | 12.18 | 2292.09 | 13.32 | 1.52 | - | - |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotech | 523 | 1078.18 | -1.21 | 8.72 | 15.19 | 1875.85 | 16.99 | 1.77 | - | - |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotech | 118 | 111.60 | -0.37 | 10.04 | -5.74 | 2878.09 | -6.11 | 0.88 | - | - |
| Agricultural Food & Beverages | ||||||||||
| Food Producers | 306 | 661.03 | -0.86 | 2.70 | 4.98 | 1185.85 | 7.65 | 3.11 | - | - |
| Food Producers | 104 | 989.94 | -1.70 | 5.05 | 12.38 | 1,593.57 | 14.37 | 1.97 | - | - |
| Energy | ||||||||||
| Energy | 373 | 697.06 | -0.06 | 2.48 | 30.29 | 1510.37 | 33.11 | 3.00 | - | - |
| Electricity | 246 | 522.87 | -0.11 | 1.00 | 1.87 | 581.07 | 1.00 | 0.90 | - | - |
| Alternative Energy | 88 | 99.74 | -0.57 | -1.70 | 7.91 | 124.23 | 9.94 | 3.53 | - | - |
| Industrial Energy | 67 | 426.05 | -0.69 | 1.00 | 1.67 | 547.41 | 1.38 | 3.38 | - | - |
| Oil & Gas Coal | 306 | 721.43 | -0.03 | 2.42 | 31.61 | 1627.68 | 34.65 | 3.14 | - | - |
| Gas Water & Multi-Utilities | 117 | 717.64 | 0.16 | -3.27 | 5.58 | 1810.25 | 8.27 | 3.54 | - | - |
| Banks | 455 | 192.08 | 0.17 | -3.68 | 4.16 | 1876.16 | 8.27 | 2.94 | - | - |
| Transportation | ||||||||||
| Automobiles & Parts | 298 | 1046.32 | -0.84 | 7.00 | -13.70 | 1724.18 | -12.80 | 1.52 | - | - |
| Automobiles & Parts | 386 | 1023.47 | -0.44 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1,000.00 | -1.00 | 0.90 | - | - |
| Industrials | ||||||||||
| Industrial Metals | 102 | 3087.19 | 0.79 | -1.14 | 8.86 | 4716.75 | 9.59 | 1.07 | - | - |
| Industrial Engineering | 330 | 2374.67 | 0.69 | 0.22 | 21.64 | 2765.46 | 22.76 | 1.35 | - | - |
| Industrial Materials | 95 | 298.59 | 0.35 | 3.08 | 3.74 | 527.06 | 5.51 | 2.76 | - | - |
| Industrial Metals & Mining | 314 | 1179.71 | 0.27 | -3.45 | -1.24 | 2140.22 | -2.62 | 0.27 | - | - |
| Industrial Support Services | 235 | 1327.75 | -0.01 | 8.71 | 3.31 | 1947.43 | 4.32 | 1.24 | - | - |
| Industrials | 2062 | 1613.23 | 0.53 | 2.78 | 12.54 | 2577.13 | 13.71 | 1.41 | - | - |
| Real Estate | 204 | 191.35 | 0.00 | - | - | 2146.65 | -1.00 | 0.54 | - | - |
| Resources & Materials | ||||||||||
| Basic Materials | 998 | 1161.87 | -0.21 | 13.78 | 22.05 | 1077.26 | 23.37 | 1.90 | - | - |
| Basic Materials | 434 | 1089.03 | 0.53 | 2.40 | 17.75 | 1953.31 | 19.55 | 2.05 | - | - |
| Construction & Materials | 461 | 1456.78 | 0.82 | -0.58 | 3.05 | 2417.97 | 4.29 | 1.61 | - | - |
| Construction & Materials | 40 | 135.26 | 0.26 | -0.58 | -0.58 | 135.26 | -0.58 | 0.58 | - | - |
| Precious Metals & Mining | 95 | 1681.40 | -2.02 | 36.66 | 18.33 | 2980.52 | 19.64 | 1.37 | - | - |
UK COMPANY RESULTS
| Company | Turnover(E) |
| Arrow Exploration $ | Int 57.7m (35.4m) |
| Empire Metals | Int - (-) |
| Greatland Resources $ | Fin 2.3bn (957.4m) |
| Jadestone Energy $ | Int 234.0m (228.3m) |
| Macfarlane Group | Int 148.9m (146.6m) |
| Partners Group Private Equity € | Int - (-) |
| PPHE Hotel Group | Int 209.3m (199.9m) |
| Prudential $ | Int 5.9bn (5.3bn) |
| Pulsar Helium $ | Fin - (-) |
| South32 $ | Fin 5.8bn (5.8bn) |
| Close(s) | %Chg | Close(s) | %Chg | |
| 3i Group | 2834.00 | -0.35 | Intl Care Airlines | 436.90 |
| Aberdeen Group | 251.00 | 0.06 | JCI | 2508.00 |
| Airbus | 4076.00 | -1.26 | Interlink Group | 5445.00 |
| Airtel Africa | 3460.00 | 0.12 | Investec | 645.00 |
| Alliance Writon | 1373.00 | -0.65 | JD Sports Fashion | 86.44 |
| Anglo American | 4543.00 | 0.55 | Kingfisher | 318.30 |
| Ashtead Lines | 4439.00 | 0.37 | Lion Energy | 696.50 |
| Asics, Biot Finance | 2664.00 | -0.72 | Legal & General | 291.20 |
| AstraZeneca | 12114.00 | -0.98 | Lion Finance | 13360.00 |
| AutostrSector | 536.20 | -0.56 | Lloyds Bkg Grp | 109.20 |
| Aviva | 722.00 | -0.89 | London Stock Exchange Ptg | 17.72 |
| Babcock Intl | 1002.00 | -0.32 | Lab Stock Ex | 8980.00 |
| BAC Systems | 2000.00 | 0.19 | M&G | 348.70 |
| Bentley | 452.60 | 1.39 | Marathon Oil | 301.40 |
| Barrett-Redford | 319.50 | -0.84 | Melrose Ind | 509.00 |
| Beazley | 1298.50 | -0.04 | Metron Energy | 4235.00 |
| BP | 515.40 | -1.40 | Nat Grid | 1160.00 |
| BHP, Amer. Tobacco | 4103.00 | -2.03 | NatWest Group | 675.40 |
| British Land | 427.60 | -0.93 | Next | 10536.00 |
| BT Group | 268.20 | 0.09 | Pearson | 1229.50 |
| Berkel | 3700.00 | -0.14 | Penning Square Hldgs | 3500.00 |
| Berkshire | 1072.00 | -1.47 | Peyto | 1160.00 |
| Centrica | 154.60 | -0.10 | Polar CapitalTech | 653.50 |
| Coca-Cola Europac | 7910.00 | -2.16 | Prudential | 10173.50 |
| Coca-Cola HBC AG | 4564.00 | 2.19 | Rockwell Berckiser | 5116.00 |
| Compass | 2244.80 | 1.41 | RELX | 2988.00 |
| Computacenter | 5655.00 | 7.86 | Rentskii Initial | 344.40 |
| Convatec | 229.50 | 0.88 | Rio Tinto | 7688.00 |
| Coca International | 349.00 | -0.36 | RollsRoyce | 1258.80 |
| DCC Energy | 6380.00 | 0.31 | Sainsbury (J) | 332.10 |
| Diageo | 1701.50 | -2.02 | Schroders | 504.00 |
| Diploma | 7280.00 | -0.88 | Scott Dot Inv Tot | 1476.50 |
| Endesa Mining | 4750.00 | -0.15 | Seaco | 964.00 |
| Estein | 511.00 | -3.66 | Seven Trent | 3100.00 |
| Experian | 3045.00 | 2.63 | Shell | 3311.00 |
| FMC Inv Trust | 343.00 | -0.12 | Smith & Nephew | 1072.50 |
| Fresnillo | 3110.00 | 1.41 | Smiths Group | 2826.00 |
| Games Works | 18330.00 | -2.55 | Sprouts Group | 7140.00 |
| Glencore | 595.30 | -0.58 | SSS | 2381.00 |
| HSA | 1822.00 | 1.60 | Standard Chartered | 114.60 |
| Haleon | 369.50 | -1.02 | Standard Life | 929.50 |
| Halma | 2672.00 | 1.55 | St James's Place | 1176.50 |
| Hiscox | 1835.00 | ... | Teva | 455.00 |
| Howden Joinery | 804.50 | -1.85 | The Sage Grp | 1130.50 |
| HSBC | 1504.00 | -1.20 | Trina Bvg Box | 199.00 |
| IG Group | 1394.00 | 0.07 | Unilever | 4752.00 |
| IIM | 3124.00 | -0.45 | Utd. Utilities | 1419.00 |
| Imperial Brands | 2523.00 | -1.41 | Vodafone | 111.00 |
| Informa | 891.20 | -0.27 | Woor | 2852.00 |
| InterCont'l Hotels | 11930.40 | -0.63 | Whitbread | 2472.00 |
UK RECENT STOCK ADDITIONS
| Close (p) | %Chg | Close (p) | %Chg | ||
| ATC Music Group | 182.50 | - | Mendell Helium | 5.95 | 2.02 |
| Braucas Solutions | 182.50 | - | Merdian Mining | 95.00 | 8.74 |
| Central Africa Group | 200.00 | - | PetroChina | 26.50 | - |
| Comcast Metals | 111.00 | 2.30 | Power Probe | 65.50 | 1.35 |
| Daimch Corp | 464.00 | - | Rith Helium | 7.50 | -1.32 |
| EDM Medical Group | 10.00 | - | Sensil Resources | 21.00 | - |
| Generation Essentials | 85.71 | 0.04 | Sintana Energy | 21.50 | - |
| Halo Minerals | 10.25 | -2.38 | Sunbelt Minerals | 5380.00 | -2.44 |
| Fonix Financial | 145.00 | - | Tapix Holdings | 44.00 | - |
| Mayflower Acquisition | 604.71 | 0.04 | The Smarter Web Co | 31.80 | 0.36 |
| Stock | Price | +Chg% |
| Crown Castle | 75.54 | -0.75 |
| CDX | 51.76 | 0.25 |
| Cummins | 578.14 | 5.47 |
| Danaher | 94.34 | 0.36 |
| Danaher | 215.36 | -0.61 |
| Deere & Co. | 624.54 | 3.88 |
| Delphi Technologies C | 463.82 | 12.30 |
| Digital Signal Svs. | 114.25 | 0.00 |
| Digital Realty Trust | 193.43 | 1.11 |
| Dominion Energy | 66.91 | -0.02 |
| DollarSuisse A | 239.93 | 3.43 |
| East Asia | 143.25 | 0.00 |
| Eastman | 121.89 | 0.30 |
| Edson Corp | 419.44 | 10.24 |
| Ecolab | 290.60 | 1.08 |
| ElevanceHealth | 462.54 | 3.67 |
| Eli Lilly & Llc | 1189.41 | 445.22 |
| Energent Electric | 158.29 | 3.33 |
| Enelis | 144.84 | 1.06 |
| Eogilon | 107.61 | 6.17 |
| Exelon | 44.44 | 0.13 |
| ExxonMobil Hldgs | 158.19 | -2.45 |
| Ferrari | 51.51 | 0.84 |
| FedEx | 335.99 | 2.28 |
| Ferguson Ent | 225.73 | |
| FCC US$ 66 | 1133.70 | 3.44 |
| Fiaty°F | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| Fiatry Entertainment | 98.00 | -4.00 |
| Fortinet Inc. | 157.54 | 3.88 |
| FreeportMcKesson | 78.00 | -0.91 |
| Gaming | 269.02 | 0.57 |
| Gilead Sciences | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| GE Healthcare Tech | 73.31 | -0.60 |
| GE Vernova | 953.09 | 26.38 |
| General Dynamics | 387.02 | 5.44 |
| Genetext | 148.09 | -0.68 |
| Gilead Sciences | 148.09 | -0.68 |
| Goldman Sachs Group | 1040.46 | -18.42 |
| HCA Healthcare | 427.16 | -1.60 |
| IIMR | 229.00 | -0.00 |
| Home Depot | 334.85 | -3.03 |
| Howmet International | 220.67 | 4.69 |
| Howmet Aerospace | 269.34 | 5.30 |
| IBM | 229.00 | -0.00 |
| Illinois Tool Works | 285.51 | 3.88 |
| Intel | 88.24 | 0.76 |
| Interactive Bkgers Ltd. * | 97.02 | -1.17 |
| Intercontinental Hotels | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| Intuit | 345.88 | -11.98 |
| Intuitive Surgical | 370.42 | -1.43 |
| Johnson & Johnson | 270.00 | -3.14 |
| JPMorgan Chase | 25.00 | -0.01 |
| JPMorgan Chase | 356.50 | -0.19 |
| Kenvue | 19.22 | -0.11 |
| Keurig Oil Parp | 32.20 | 0.36 |
| KeyCorp Inc. | 26.00 | 0.00 |
| Kroger Mortgage P | 32.02 | 1.08 |
| KKB & Co. | 108.50 | 0.50 |
| LILA | 183.63 | 0.48 |
| Marathon Technologies | 362.96 | -2.62 |
| Lam Research | 312.88 | -1.78 |
| Linde | 450.33 | 3.13 |
| Lockheed Martin | 585.62 | 9.10 |
| LindePfdA | 116.55 | -0.26 |
| Lululemon Industria | 118.35 | -1.98 |
| Manhattan Petroleum | 362.27 | 7.39 |
| Marriott International | 356.67 | 0.90 |
| Marathon Oil & Gas | 115.00 | -0.11 |
| Marvell Technology | 245.11 | 4.72 |
| Mercantier A | 588.47 | -0.90 |
| McDonald's | 266.93 | -1.17 |
| McDonald's | 686.65 | -8.44 |
| Microsoft | 62.32 | 0.00 |
| Mens Squares | 153.10 | -3.35 |
| Meta Platforms A | 576.14 | 6.08 |
| Meta Inc. | 98.52 | 0.65 |
| Microsoft Computer Science | 538.97 | -1.84 |
| Microsoft | 496.37 | 4.66 |
| Mondelez International A | 63.01 | 0.07 |
| Monster Brands | 47.81 | -0.92 |
| Morgan Stanley | 514.00 | -1.68 |
| Morgan Stanley | 214.89 | -2.69 |
| Motorola Solutions | 467.78 | 1.89 |
| MSD Res A | 564.22 | -0.23 |
| MitsubishiUFJ | 115.00 | -0.00 |
| Netflix | 81.46 | -0.77 |
| Newmont Corp | 131.60 | -3.54 |
| NewMedia | 84.22 | 0.23 |
| Nokia | 38.30 | -0.69 |
| NorfolkSouthern | 352.68 | 1.44 |
| Northrop Grumman | 549.85 | 7.43 |
| Nu Holdings A | 15.17 | 0.03 |
| Nokia | 15.17 | 0.03 |
| NXP Semiconductors | 223.15 | -1.60 |
| Occidental Petroleum | 58.62 | 0.21 |
| Fiat Truck Alliance | 8.82 | 0.06 | 14.07 | 7.46 | 2.64 | 294.00 | 164.49 |
| Futu Holdings A | 127.34 | 1.71 | 202.53 | 80.50 | 2.00 | 12.19 | 97.54 |
| POD Holdings A | 86.74 | -1.01 | 139.41 | 71.94 | 0.00 | 34.70 | 492.56 |
| Denmark (DKK) | |||||||
| DSV A/S | 1375.00 | -25.00 | 1913.50 | 1233.00 | 0.51 | 40.09 | 390.61 |
| Novo Nordisk B | 304.95 | -2.85 | 409.95 | 224.25 | 3.84 | 13.22 | 1033.82 |
United Kingdom (USD)
FT GLOBAL 500: THE WORLD'S LARGEST COMPANIES
| Stock | 52 Week | ||||||
| Price | +/Div | High | Low | Yld | P/E | MV (b) | |
| Australia (AUD) | |||||||
| ANZ Group Holdings | 36.95 | -0.08 | 41.00 | 32.46 | 5.89 | 18.98 | 111.44 |
| BHP Group | 67.40 | -0.27 | 68.22 | 39.30 | 3.56 | 34.81 | 342.67 |
| Commonwealth Bank | 155.46 | -1.55 | 185.59 | 146.98 | 3.25 | 23.82 | 260.16 |
| CSL Ltd. | 172.44 | -1.20 | 222.47 | 90.00 | 2.36 | 26.82 | 82.58 |
| Macquarie Group | 252.77 | 0.77 | 267.90 | 197.31 | 3.18 | 25.82 | 96.97 |
| National Australia Bank | 38.26 | 0.01 | 48.45 | 35.48 | 4.44 | 17.31 | 119.27 |
| Westfarmers | 83.27 | 0.58 | 94.70 | 70.60 | 2.56 | 32.28 | 94.53 |
| Wesprac Banking | 33.83 | -0.19 | 43.32 | 33.46 | 4.55 | 16.84 | 115.71 |
| Belgium (EUR) | |||||||
| Aon | 57.75 | 0.30 | 67.10 | 40.85 | 4.19 | 57.75 | 101.91 |
| Stock | Price | +/-Chg | 52 Week | P/E | M/A | ||
| High | Low | Yld | P/E | ||||
| Fielo (EUR) | |||||||
| Nordia Bank AG | 17.48 | 0.01 | 17.77 | 12.94 | 0.00 | 12.58 | 59.48 |
| France (EUR) | |||||||
| Air Liquide | 168.72 | 0.94 | 169.80 | 154.86 | 1.99 | 32.33 | 107.67 |
| Airbus | 205.85 | 1.30 | 221.30 | 157.42 | 1.55 | 38.40 | 163.09 |
| Asml | 42.71 | 0.03 | 45.66 | 36.55 | 5.31 | 12.18 | 91.38 |
| AirLiquide A | 155.72 | -0.01 | 160.30 | 138.00 | 1.00 | 25.48 | 30.25 |
| Cummins Group de Gestion | 82.30 | 1.04 | 95.86 | 65.88 | 2.79 | 12.28 | 40.72 |
| Cresno Agricole | 19.01 | 0.01 | 20.40 | 15.29 | 0.00 | 8.72 | 57.52 |
| Danone | 65.72 | 0.28 | 80.14 | 60.64 | 3.42 | 25.57 | 44.91 |
| Deutsche Bank | 22.54 | -0.11 | 30.36 | 18.97 | 1.00 | 20.64 | 30.25 |
| ENGL | 24.96 | -0.37 | 29.89 | 17.30 | 4.13 | 16.42 | 63.46 |
| EssilorLuxottica | 158.20 | 0.05 | 323.80 | 159.15 | 2.51 | 30.62 | 73.91 |
| Hermes International | 1547.50 | -8.00 | 2300.00 | 1465.50 | 1.16 | 35.23 | 103.37 |
| Iberdrola | 387.20 | -1.30 | 413.00 | 306.00 | 1.00 | 24.88 | 100.00 |
| LMHerm Hectonics | 453.80 | 3.30 | 654.70 | 440.00 | 2.85 | 23.76 | 224.85 |
| Safran | 352.40 | 6.60 | 366.50 | 262.60 | 0.96 | 46.11 | 146.59 |
| Sanofi | 78.29 | -0.45 | 91.15 | 71.25 | 5.26 | 10.00 | 94.56 |
| Schneider Electric | 299.30 | 2.95 | 312.30 | 208.80 | 1.40 | 34.83 | 173.12 |
| TJX | 11.80 | -0.01 | 12.30 | 9.80 | 0.00 | 10.88 | 10.00 |
| VMCI | 119.50 | -0.10 | 143.15 | 112.40 | 4.23 | 13.81 | 70.15 |
| Vita Unibanco Holdi | 42.60 | - | 47.80 | 32.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 239.32 |
| Vita Unibanco Holdi Prd | 39.45 | 0.01 | 49.67 | 38.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 213.39 |
| Pristoria Brasileiro | 45.50 | -0.05 | 56.14 | 30.96 | 0.00 | 40.71 | 341.82 |
| Pristoria Brasileiro Prd | 41.45 | 0.10 | 50.69 | 29.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 225.76 |
| Canada (CAD) | 78.45 | -0.25 | 91.62 | 54.68 | 0.00 | 88.39 | 332.86 |
| Argenta Eagle Mines | 296.80 | -13.18 | 344.96 | 184.64 | 0.00 | 25.32 | 151.21 |
| Alimentation Cautious Ltd | 84.27 | -0.92 | 95.15 | 68.30 | 1.02 | 28.98 | 77.38 |
| Bank of America | 116.50 | -0.10 | 121.80 | 76.50 | 1.02 | 28.98 | 77.38 |
| Bank of Nova Scotia | 129.81 | 1.08 | 129.25 | 84.41 | 3.31 | 26.71 | 180.00 |
| Brookfield | 57.68 | -0.35 | 102.59 | 52.04 | 0.67 | 103.32 | 129.16 |
| Brookfield Asset Mgmt. | 72.22 | -0.39 | 88.51 | 58.09 | 3.87 | 41.27 | 115.35 |
| Canadian Imperial Bank | 103.50 | 0.10 | 112.07 | 100.50 | 2.81 | 28.64 | 151.80 |
| Canadian National Bank | 116.50 | -0.10 | 121.80 | 76.50 | 3.87 | 31.27 | 115.35 |
| Canadian National | 68.93 | 0.25 | 70.99 | 41.67 | 3.83 | 16.81 | 142.10 |
| Canadian Pacific Airways | 131.40 | 0.87 | 133.38 | 98.50 | 0.75 | 41.71 | 115.51 |
| Construction Materials | 20707.00 | -60.63 | 4634.98 | 2180.00 | 0.19 | 1033.68 | 455.06 |
| Enbridge | 69.80 | 0.87 | 80.65 | 62.42 | 5.56 | 38.54 | 125.42 |
| Enbridge Midstream | 116.50 | 0.10 | 121.80 | 76.50 | 3.87 | 31.27 | 115.35 |
| Royal Bank of Canada | 288.11 | 1.48 | 306.38 | 188.54 | 2.44 | 26.17 | 408.41 |
| Diploma Pty Ltd | 208.50 | -4.34 | 253.10 | 129.01 | 0.00 | 139.83 | 251.99 |
| Societ Energy | 91.13 | 0.64 | 98.53 | 53.02 | 2.63 | 23.79 | 106.59 |
| TJX Corp | 87.16 | 1.04 | 108.18 | 64.04 | 3.43 | 34.86 | 87.16 |
| TE Connectors Comm BK | 116.50 | -0.10 | 126.61 | 78.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 225.76 |
| Waste Connections | 2327.00 | 2.57 | 250.50 | 203.46 | 0.94 | 55.50 | 58.49 |
| Company | 2010 | -1.90 | 196.40 | 129.95 | 1.86 | 20.20 | 27.13 |
| adidas AG | 150.70 | -1.90 | 451.40 | 338.80 | 3.79 | 15.79 | 171.84 |
| Alliance Oil | 107.78 | -0.30 | 47.78 | 33.21 | 4.66 | 14.21 | 24.21 |
| BMW | 57.69 | -0.32 | 97.32 | 56.40 | 7.63 | 4.85 | 35.52 |
| Deutsche Bank | 34.63 | -1.43 | 34.26 | 23.82 | 2.89 | 10.96 | 66.16 |
| Deutsche Borse | 288.90 | -0.60 | 289.00 | 1.00 | 4.16 | 43.54 | 53.45 |
| Deutsche Telekom AG | 29.53 | -0.17 | 34.36 | 23.53 | 3.46 | 14.69 | 140.30 |
| DVA Group | 56.92 | -0.07 | 58.30 | 36.99 | 3.34 | 18.39 | 65.34 |
| Informa Technologies | 65.19 | -0.34 | 68.63 | 38.02 | 0.63 | 11.68 | 72.07 |
| Infineon Software | 446.64 | -0.27 | 446.64 | 22.25 | 0.53 | 12.38 | 22.16 |
| Merck | 138.65 | -0.70 | 148.80 | 100.70 | 1.59 | 21.70 | 17.92 |
| Muenchese Bank | 515.80 | -1.40 | 575.90 | 437.40 | 4.65 | 24.63 | 65.49 |
| Porsche | 43.25 | -0.83 | 50.66 | 35.62 | 2.34 | 10.95 | 19.70 |
| Ricemarital | 1138.80 | 20.60 | 2008.00 | 800.20 | 1.01 | 68.98 | 53.27 |
| SAP | 180.02 | -5.44 | 244.30 | 137.50 | 1.39 | 28.22 | 221.16 |
| SAP Inc. | 158.10 | -1.00 | 158.10 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Siemens Energy | 151.10 | -1.66 | 191.66 | 83.32 | 0.46 | 238.44 | 130.11 |
| Siemens Healthers | 38.26 | -0.44 | 49.71 | 32.81 | 2.55 | 30.55 | 44.29 |
| Volkswagen | 73.55 | -1.10 | 110.20 | 71.00 | 7.07 | 5.53 | 21.70 |
| Volkswagen Fiat | 72.42 | -0.88 | 109.15 | 68.20 | 7.26 | 5.45 | 43.93 |
| Agricultural Bank Oth | 6.06 | 0.01 | 8.69 | 5.79 | 3.64 | 8.75 | 21.98 |
| Bank of China A | 6.20 | 0.06 | 6.39 | 5.13 | 3.85 | 8.06 | 14.79 |
| Bank of Communications A | 7.17 | 0.01 | 7.77 | 6.37 | 4.53 | 6.66 | 415.19 |
| China Construction Bank A | 10.67 | 0.01 | 10.98 | 9.50 | 3.84 | 8.21 | 226.02 |
| China Life Insurance A | 38.58 | 0.06 | 41.92 | 30.32 | 2.23 | 7.08 | 603.37 |
| China Mobile Telecom A | 10.50 | 0.01 | 10.88 | 9.28 | 3.15 | 7.00 | 100.00 |
| China Petroleum Chemical A | 5.33 | -0.03 | 8.11 | 4.43 | 4.07 | 20.34 | 517.77 |
| China Overseas Enga A | 47.26 | 0.09 | 51.18 | 37.24 | 4.25 | 17.77 | 865.42 |
| China Yangtze River A | 28.24 | 0.03 | 29.57 | 25.58 | 3.54 | 20.02 | 690.98 |
| China Railway Group A | 10.00 | 0.01 | 10.00 | 9.00 | 3.00 | 10.00 | 100.00 |
| Cang Benkai Tbk A | 379.69 | 0.27 | 468.75 | 272.72 | 0.95 | 23.48 | 16107.71 |
| East Many Home Inc A | 19.36 | 0.43 | 29.36 | 17.22 | 0.53 | 25.31 | 306.32 |
| Fascot Oil Int'l E | 60.57 | 0.42 | 64.95 | 44.22 | 1.62 | 34.03 | 1201.86 |
| Industrial & Commercial B | 1.92 | 0.01 | 2.00 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 100.00 |
| Industrial Bank J | 18.17 | 0.19 | 23.06 | 16.44 | 5.85 | 5.95 | 385.38 |
| Jiangsu Hengxi Png A | 46.74 | 0.25 | 74.04 | 45.26 | 0.43 | 39.28 | 298.15 |
| Kweichow China A | 1302.20 | -1.00 | 1586.00 | 1151.01 | 3.99 | 18.94 | 12638.61 |
| Liaoyuan Finance Int'l A | 57.13 | 2.35 | 67.76 | 42.99 | 0.44 | 24.94 | 419.39 |
| Liaoyuan Finance Int'l B | 88.20 | 0.35 | 98.20 | 64.88 | 0.44 | 24.94 | 100.00 |
| PetroChina A | 11.01 | -0.18 | 13.69 | 8.04 | 4.27 | 12.80 | 1.78 |
| Ping An Insurance Group A | 56.13 | 1.12 | 74.68 | 46.90 | 4.86 | 7.31 | 588.35 |
| Zijin Sheng Bank China A | 5.08 | 0.04 | 6.44 | 4.76 | 4.30 | 8.36 | 5.09 |
| Wu Xing China A | 10.00 | 0.01 | 10.00 | 8.00 | 3.00 | 10.00 | 100.00 |
| Wuliang Bank East A | 71.90 | 0.38 | 131.85 | 70.52 | 7.17 | 31.17 | 279.09 |
| Zhi Minng Group A | 34.77 | 0.49 | 47.94 | 24.96 | 2.32 | 17.68 | 710.14 |
| Koneil Finance House | 0.77 | -0.00 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 3.10 | 23.24 | 15.30 |
| Mexica (MXN) | |||||||
| Ameica Movil B | 20.09 | -0.05 | 24.48 | 17.48 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 1249.30 |
| Wal-Mart de Mexico | 47.93 | 0.20 | 63.97 | 46.31 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 836.20 |
| Netherlands (EUR) | |||||||
| Adyen | 1071.40 | -7.60 | 1600.80 | 772.40 | 0.00 | 58.84 | 33.95 |
| ASM, Holding | 1487.60 | -3.40 | 1741.00 | 611.80 | 0.52 | 75.22 | 581.29 |
| Heineken | 72.82 | 0.40 | 80.44 | 63.90 | 2.64 | 15.63 | 41.17 |
| ING Group | 30.57 | 0.41 | 31.21 | 20.21 | 3.72 | 15.44 | 87.82 |
| Prosus N | 38.01 | -0.04 | 63.94 | 36.17 | 0.74 | 7.19 | 83.11 |
| The Magnum for Crown Co | 17.45 | 0.18 | 17.57 | 11.02 | 0.00 | 36.35 | 10.68 |
| Universal Music Group NV | 14.64 | -0.23 | 25.37 | 14.17 | 3.55 | 34.05 | 26.92 |
| Norway (NOK) | |||||||
| Equinor | 387.60 | -2.30 | 422.30 | 226.40 | 3.72 | 199.79 | 926.65 |
| Republic of Korea (KRW) | |||||||
| LG Energy Solution | 351000.00 | 1500.00 | 527000.00 | 290500.00 | 0.00 | 76.55 | 8214.00 |
| SAMSLING BIOLOGICS | 1589000.00 | 14000.00 | 1987000.00 | 983000.00 | 0.00 | 66.37 | 74019.23 |
| Samsung Electronics | 267500.00 | 4500.00 | 374500.00 | 67500.00 | 0.64 | 39.59 | 0.00 |
| Samsung Electronics Pref | 196800.00 | 2300.00 | 243500.00 | 55100.00 | 0.86 | 196.08 | 157906.65 |
| Samsung Eps | 380000.00 | 14000.00 | 773000.00 | 339000.00 | 0.00 | 300.87 | 9455.56 |
| SK hyix | 1688000.00 | 10000.00 | 2987000.00 | 253000.00 | 0.16 | 27.21 | 0.00 |
| Stock | Price | +/-Chg | 52 Week | Yld | P/E | MV (bl) | ||
| High | Low | |||||||
| Shin-Etsu Chemical | 5987.00 | -38.00 | 7939.00 | 4366.00 | 1.94 | 23.61 | 11944.47 | |
| SoftBank | 239.50 | 0.20 | 248.50 | 232.60 | 3.67 | 21.10 | 11502.92 | |
| SoftBank Group | 5163.00 | 76.00 | 37895.00 | 3385.00 | 0.21 | 5.91 | 29498.27 | |
| Sony Financial Group | 162.70 | 0.60 | 219.00 | 129.30 | 4.50 | 20.44 | 1101.54 | |
| Sony Group | 3079.00 | 46.00 | 4776.00 | 3043.00 | 0.90 | 70.90 | 23133.50 | |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Financial | 6732.00 | 99.00 | 7500.00 | 3668.00 | 2.67 | 16.34 | 25565.17 | |
| Takeda Pharmaceutical | 5860.00 | 47.00 | 6633.00 | 4102.00 | 3.46 | 60.57 | 39366.35 | |
| Tokio Marine Holdings | 7629.00 | 221.00 | 8468.00 | 5300.00 | 3.21 | 27.31 | 14754.49 | |
| Tokyo Electron | 55500.00 | 90.00 | 81298.00 | 19670.00 | 0.83 | 44.24 | 23557.82 | |
| Toyota Motor | 3070.00 | -12.00 | 4000.00 | 2666.00 | 3.26 | 10.40 | 44806.51 | |
| BosNtech | 112.56 | -1.49 | 124.00 | 79.52 | 0.00 | 53.66 | 28.46 |
| Hong Kong (HKD) | |||||||
| AIA Group | 74.20 | -0.15 | 92.15 | 68.95 | 2.67 | 125.55 | 767.72 |
| HKEX | 420.80 | 3.00 | 462.20 | 360.00 | 3.32 | 29.95 | 533.51 |
| Saudi Arabia (SAR) | |||||||
| ACWA Power | 196.80 | -0.60 | 252.60 | 154.50 | 0.23 | 82.00 | 150.85 |
| Al Rajhi Bank | 69.00 | 0.05 | 113.00 | 62.00 | 2.42 | 17.69 | 414.00 |
| Saudi Arabian Mining | 70.40 | 0.90 | 79.90 | 51.25 | 0.00 | 90.26 | 273.77 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil | 26.10 | -0.18 | 27.96 | 23.04 | 5.20 | 18.12 | 63.16 |
| Saudi Basic Industries | 50.35 | 0.05 | 64.00 | 48.20 | 5.16 | 98.73 | 151.05 |
| Saudi National Bank | 43.40 | 0.38 | 45.24 | 33.30 | 5.30 | 10.74 | 280.40 |
| STC Co | 44.60 | 0.32 | 45.38 | 41.14 | 4.93 | 15.02 | 223.00 |
| HHEXIndia (INR) | 420.80 | 3.00 | 462.20 | 360.00 | 3.32 | 29.95 | 533.51 |
| Bajaj Food Finance | 1087.05 | 6.00 | 1177.60 | 788.40 | 0.55 | 57.05 | 6767.93 |
| Bharti Agric Ltd | 1905.00 | -37.00 | 2174.70 | 1745.00 | 1.26 | 145.531 | 1888.15 |
| HCL Technologies | 1300.00 | -12.00 | 1770.00 | 1020.00 | 4.62 | 20.26 | 3527.76 |
| Hindustan Software | 721.00 | -10.00 | 865.00 | 620.00 | 1.03 | 26.57 | 453.38 |
| Industion Industries | 2030.00 | 6.00 | 2779.70 | 2006.90 | 2.02 | 46.41 | 4769.67 |
| ICICI Bank | 1430.70 | 7.70 | 1479.90 | 1187.55 | 0.84 | 22.6410267.27 | |
| Infosys | 1120.80 | -22.20 | 1727.95 | 964.00 | 4.28 | 17.38 | 4548.27 |
| ITC Ltd | 270.85 | -0.15 | 426.50 | 265.10 | 5.35 | 9.75 | 3393.69 |
| Kraft-Makko Finance Bank | 416.20 | 14.20 | 435.15 | 345.40 | 0.16 | 3.74 | 4140.10 |
| Lamard & Toubro | 4043.80 | -72.60 | 4440.00 | 3288.65 | 0.94 | 34.58 | 5563.73 |
| Life Insurance Corp | 416.00 | 1.10 | 856.60 | 385.90 | 2.40 | 14.62 | 5260.40 |
| Lancashire | 1225.00 | -12.00 | 1731.81 | 1202.00 | 1.03 | 28.97 | 4523.67 |
| Reliance Industries | 1299.00 | -13.60 | 1611.20 | 1250.55 | 0.46 | 25.2417567.76 | |
| State Bank of India | 1053.80 | 6.80 | 1234.80 | 798.60 | 1.65 | 12.13 | 9727.22 |
| Sun Pharmaceutical Inds | 1901.00 | -16.00 | 2047.55 | 1547.25 | 0.84 | 41.69 | 4561.03 |
| Tata Consultancy Svs | 2271.00 | -20.00 | 3336.70 | 1970.00 | 2.86 | 16.92 | 8216.68 |
| Agricultural Bank China | H-2 | 6.33 | 0.52 | 5.05 | 4.48 | 8.05 | 193.04 |
| Allstate Bank Holding | 116.60 | 2.40 | 186.20 | 86.65 | 0.88 | 104.48 | 233.59 |
| Bank of China | 5.55 | 0.01 | 5.51 | 4.11 | 4.60 | 7.51 | 464.52 |
| Bank of Communications H | 7.57 | 0.04 | 7.83 | 6.33 | 4.85 | 7.01 | 285.04 |
| BTO Inc | 83.60 | -1.00 | 120.60 | 71.40 | 0.44 | 25.87 | 341.98 |
| China CITIC Bank | 8.65 | 0.01 | 8.65 | 7.45 | 4.70 | 10.00 | 14.75 |
| China Construction Bank H | 9.21 | 0.04 | 9.36 | 7.18 | 4.76 | 7.08 | 22.15 |
| China Life Insurance H | 29.20 | 1.08 | 36.16 | 20.90 | 3.32 | 5.36 | 217.28 |
| China Merchants Bank H | 49.42 | 0.04 | 53.70 | 43.34 | 4.60 | 8.67 | 226.88 |
| China Petroleum Chemical H | 4.71 | 0.01 | 5.70 | 3.36 | 5.33 | 17.98 | 113.02 |
| China Railway Group H | 10.00 | 0.01 | 10.00 | 7.00 | 4.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| CITIC Securities H | 17.64 | 1.66 | 32.50 | 22.24 | 3.53 | 14.10 | 94.63 |
| ICICI H | 7.54 | 0.07 | 7.66 | 5.56 | 4.64 | 7.54 | 654.86 |
| JCI com A | 113.10 | 0.10 | 143.80 | 95.80 | 3.47 | 16.42 | 282.36 |
| Median B | 76.65 | 0.05 | 122.60 | 63.65 | 0.00 | 20.22 | 456.79 |
| Nasdaq China | 10.00 | 0.01 | 10.00 | 7.00 | 4.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| NetEase | 195.50 | -3.50 | 249.00 | 168.00 | 2.35 | 18.46 | 627.96 |
| Nanjing Fuqng H | 44.04 | 1.06 | 56.25 | 39.22 | 2.56 | 31.24 | 221.93 |
| PetroChina H | 9.92 | -0.14 | 12.22 | 6.99 | 3.23 | 11.53 | 209.30 |
| Ping An Insurance Group L | 15.25 | 0.15 | 74.70 | 50.00 | 5.52 | 7.31 | 428.35 |
| Sinopec & PetroChina H | 10.00 | 0.01 | 10.00 | 7.00 | 4.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Tencent Holdings | 445.40 | 3.40 | 683.00 | 411.00 | 1.19 | 18.00 | 4054.54 |
| Xiaomi Corp B | 28.46 | 0.70 | 59.90 | 21.30 | 0.00 | 17.57 | 607.05 |
| Zijin Mining Group H | 36.08 | 1.04 | 46.98 | 24.34 | 2.42 | 19.53 | 228.06 |
| Banci Central Asia | 6350.00 | -50.00 | 6750.00 | 4820.00 | 0.00 | 13.60 | 7827.97 |
| FT Banto Renewables | 3310.00 | 90.00 | 10725.00 | 2300.00 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 428.32 |
| Italy (EUR) | |||||||
| Asocurazioni Generali | 44.08 | 0.42 | 45.48 | 31.76 | 3.72 | 18.14 | 67.65 |
| Enel | 9.51 | -0.04 | 10.31 | 7.69 | 5.15 | 25.71 | 96.72 |
| Eni | 23.02 | -0.24 | 25.02 | 14.48 | 4.78 | 16.33 | 69.72 |
| Ferrari | 356.15 | -5.65 | 431.20 | 269.00 | 0.84 | 51.54 | 63.14 |
| Intesa Sanpaolo | 6.86 | 0.02 | 6.94 | 4.81 | 5.48 | 29.83 | 121.32 |
| Stellantis | 4.46 | -0.03 | 10.49 | 4.37 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 12.93 |
| UniCredit SpA | 86.15 | 1.82 | 85.98 | 57.36 | 3.66 | 16.88 | 134.54 |
| Cenara | 44036.00 | 38.00 | 5833.00 | 3997.00 | 24.5 | 16.00 | 6197.20 |
| Chugai Pharmaceutical | 7851.00 | 101.00 | 5378.00 | 6002.00 | 2.87 | 28.74 | 11338.04 |
| Daethi Sarayek | 2300.00 | 70.50 | 4178.00 | 2298.00 | 24.5 | 19.19 | 5432.28 |
| FAST RETAILING | 72120.00 | 418.00 | 68600.00 | 4308.00 | 6.91 | 51.59 | 22920.10 |
| Hitachi | 5367.00 | 7.00 | 6030.00 | 3021.00 | 19.65 | 29.65 | 24570.20 |
| Honda Motor | 1674.50 | -21.50 | 1765.50 | 1238.00 | 41.58 | 15.79 | 7358.51 |
| HENYA | 24965.00 | -38.00 | 30430.00 | 19800.00 | 11.56 | 33.56 | 8358.23 |
| ITOUZHI | 2138.00 | 20.00 | 9959.00 | 1801.00 | 16.78 | 16.78 | 19647.40 |
| Japan Tobacco | 6963.00 | -3.00 | 7216.00 | 4652.00 | 24.30 | 24.30 | 13966.00 |
| KDDI | 2897.50 | -12.00 | 3121.00 | 2397.50 | 25.58 | 15.78 | 17611.59 |
| Kyotores | 61500.00 | -756.00 | 67830.00 | 51510.00 | 67.44 | 16.40 | 18621.43 |
| Mitsubishi Heavy | 4174.00 | -6.00 | 6817.00 | 3303.00 | 23.25 | 17.23 | 15358.27 |
| MitsubishiUFJ Finl | 4303.00 | -17.50 | 4397.00 | 2747.00 | 18.73 | 16.73 | 15477.73 |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Finl&F | 5759.00 | 55.00 | 3813.00 | 2103.00 | 28.58 | 16.79 | 42143.54 |
| Mitau & Co | 4894.00 | -55.00 | 6675.00 | 3308.00 | 25.85 | 16.81 | 14019.68 |
| Mizuho Financial Group | 8374.00 | 106.00 | 8919.00 | 4056.00 | 18.92 | 16.53 | 20339.71 |
| Nintendo | 8986.00 | 32.00 | 14630.00 | 6544.00 | 22.41 | 14.47 | 11421.46 |
| NTT | 169.80 | 0.40 | 169.40 | 142.00 | 31.18 | 13.45 | 15573.39 |
| Renault Heinzland | 17155.00 | 550.00 | 16960.00 | 6040.00 | 41.95 | 25.00 | 25260.81 |
| ABB | 79.70 | 0.08 | 89.14 | 52.66 | 1.18 | 30.77 | 145.31 |
| Alcon | 58.60 | -0.12 | 68.34 | 47.80 | 0.48 | 56.35 | 29.28 |
| Cino-Freineries: Richemont | 191.00 | 3.95 | 202.20 | 127.20 | 1.73 | 40.73 | 102.68 |
| Givaudan | 3373.00 | 52.00 | 3692.00 | 2566.00 | 2.13 | 37.89 | 31.14 |
| Hokim | 73.80 | 2.64 | 82.54 | 60.10 | 2.30 | 22.92 | 41.84 |
| Lonza Group | 587.80 | -8.00 | 597.80 | 454.60 | 0.85 | 65.92 | 41.28 |
| Nestle | 79.67 | 0.05 | 78.09 | 70.29 | 3.88 | 22.75 | 205.79 |
| Novartis | 127.18 | -1.16 | 131.50 | 96.03 | 2.91 | 41.70 | 258.79 |
| Roche Holding | 374.60 | -4.40 | 383.00 | 264.60 | 2.62 | 23.15 | 39.97 |
| Roche Holding Pref. | 368.30 | -5.50 | 375.60 | 291.00 | 2.66 | 22.76 | 258.75 |
| Sika | 193.10 | 2.75 | 197.60 | 120.35 | 1.92 | 29.71 | 30.99 |
| Swiss Re | 141.05 | 0.50 | 153.85 | 114.05 | 4.47 | 10.81 | 42.14 |
| UBS Group | 43.90 | 0.68 | 44.44 | 28.25 | 1.95 | 22.40 | 143.90 |
| Zurich Insurance Group | 587.80 | 2.80 | 626.00 | 521.00 | 5.02 | 18.69 | 90.40 |
| Hon Hai Precision | 246.50 | 3.50 | 314.00 | 187.50 | 2.91 | 18.11 | 3458.06 |
| MediaTek | 3945.00 | 210.00 | 4970.00 | 1130.00 | 1.36 | 59.63 | 6327.37 |
| Taiwan Semicon Mtg | 2415.00 | 15.00 | 2535.00 | 1145.00 | 1.08 | 36.45 | 62626.67 |
| United Arab Emirates (AED) | |||||||
| Adnoc Gas | 3.24 | -0.05 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.56 | 48.36 | 248.67 |
| First Acq Dhabi Bank | 19.42 | -0.18 | 20.74 | 15.32 | 4.12 | 10.50 | 214.54 |
| United Kingdom (GBP) | |||||||
| 3i Group Plc | 28.34 | -0.10 | 44.97 | 18.25 | 2.98 | 5.25 | 28.49 |
| AstraZeneca | 121.14 | -1.20 | 157.32 | 98.92 | 1.97 | 24.93 | 187.89 |
| BAE Systems | 20.92 | 0.04 | 23.60 | 15.29 | 1.81 | 30.41 | 62.81 |
| Blackeye | 4.93 | -0.07 | 5.54 | 3.53 | 2.33 | 11.25 | 66.28 |
| BP | 5.15 | -0.07 | 6.09 | 3.99 | 4.80 | 80.94 | |
| British Amer Tobacco | 41.52 | -0.86 | 53.26 | 36.77 | 5.90 | 11.83 | 89.70 |
| Compass Group | 22.45 | 0.31 | 25.81 | 20.00 | 2.26 | 27.69 | 38.17 |
| Diageo | 17.02 | -0.35 | 21.09 | 12.96 | 2.16 | 29.59 | 37.89 |
| Experian | 30.45 | 0.78 | 39.87 | 22.03 | 1.70 | 25.14 | 27.01 |
| Glencore | 5.95 | -0.04 | 7.07 | 2.82 | 2.10 | 69.88 | |
COMMODITIES
| INTEREST RATES: OFFICIAL | ||||
| Date | Rate | Current | Since | Last |
| US | Fed Funds | 3.50-3.75 | 29-04-2026 | 3.50-3.75 |
| US | Prime | 6.75 | 29-04-2026 | 6.75 |
| US | Discount | 3.75 | 29-04-2026 | 3.75 |
| Euro | Repo | 1.925 | 01-09-2025 | 2.40 |
| UK | Repo | 3.75 | 30-04-2026 | 3.75 |
| Japan | O'night Call | 0.75 | 22-01-2026 | 0.50 |
| Switzerland | Libor Target | 0.25 | 21-03-2025 | 0.50 |
| INTEREST RATES: MARKET | |||||||
| Aug 27 | Overnight | Change | OneMonth | ThreeMonth | SixMonth | OneYear | |
| Day | Week | ||||||
| SOFR | 3.660 | 0.010 | 0.040 | 3.680 | 3.764 | 3.871 | 4.023 |
| EURIBOR | - | - | - | 2.246 | 2.554 | 2.766 | 3.007 |
| ESTR | 2.187 | -0.002 | -0.001 | 2.284 | 2.398 | 2.488 | 2.618 |
| SARON | -0.054 | 0.000 | 0.024 | -0.054 | -0.045 | -0.046 | -0.046 |
| SONIA | 3.732 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 3.747 | 3.796 | 3.912 | 4.112 |
Rates are fixed at 11am UK time.
BONDS: TEN YEAR GOVT SPREADS
| BONDS: TEN YEAR GOVT SPREADS | |||||||
| Bid Yield | Spread vs Bond | Spread vs Bond | Bid Yield | Spread vs Bond | Spread vs Bond | ||
| Austria | 3.40 | 0.15 | -1.25 | Italy | 3.93 | 0.68 | -0.72 |
| Australia | 5.05 | 1.80 | 0.40 | Japan | 2.97 | -0.38 | -1.78 |
| Belgium | 3.70 | 0.45 | -0.95 | Netherlands | 3.27 | 0.02 | -1.38 |
| Brazil | 14.58 | 11.33 | 9.93 | Poland | 5.84 | 2.59 | 1.19 |
| China | 1.72 | -1.53 | -2.93 | Portugal | 3.49 | 0.24 | -1.16 |
| Denmark | 3.08 | -0.17 | -1.57 | Spain | 3.60 | 0.35 | -1.05 |
| France | 3.99 | 0.74 | -0.66 | Sweden | 2.91 | -0.34 | -1.74 |
| Germany | 3.25 | 0.00 | -1.40 | UK | 5.03 | 1.78 | 0.38 |
| Ireland | 3.27 | 0.02 | -1.38 | US | 4.65 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| 52 Week | |||||||
| Price | +/-Chg | High | Low | Yld | P/E | M/V Bt | |
| GSK | 18.52 | -0.47 | 22.82 | 14.40 | 3.78 | 13.13 | 74.92 |
| Haleon | 3.69 | -0.04 | 4.16 | 2.74 | 1.98 | 19.87 | 32.50 |
| HSBC Holdings | 15.04 | -0.18 | 16.10 | 8.43 | 3.67 | 16.88 | 258.23 |
| Lloyds Banking Group | 1.03 | -0.08 | 1.18 | 0.97 | 3.61 | 15.61 | 100.00 |
| London Stock Exchange Grp | 89.80 | 2.92 | 101.40 | 66.84 | 1.76 | 37.67 | 43.61 |
| National Grid | 11.60 | -0.23 | 14.29 | 10.00 | 4.18 | 17.71 | 58.31 |
| NatWest Group | 6.78 | -0.14 | 7.26 | 5.00 | 5.16 | 12.68 | 53.95 |
| Reckitt Benckiser Group | 51.16 | -0.42 | 65.23 | 36.64 | 4.23 | 10.92 | 32.47 |
| RELX | 26.68 | 0.82 | 35.75 | 19.91 | 2.58 | 23.69 | 46.62 |
| Rio Tinto | 76.88 | -0.34 | 91.17 | 45.28 | 4.45 | 17.02 | 96.50 |
| Rolls-Royce Holdings | 15.30 | -0.13 | 15.86 | 9.90 | 0.72 | 22.04 | 127.25 |
| Shell | 33.11 | -0.60 | 37.59 | 25.54 | 4.56 | 14.84 | 183.22 |
| Unilever | 47.52 | -0.20 | 55.42 | 36.44 | 3.47 | 12.80 | 102.37 |
| Precious Metals | ||
| Gold | 4610.02 | 14.61 |
| Silver ($) | 69.35 | 1.26 |
| Platinum | 1843.10 | 11.30 |
| Palladium | 1334.68 | 14.49 |
| Iron Ore | 95.95 | 0.03 |

The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com
| Bulk Commodities | ||
| Baltic Dry | 3107.00 | 51.00 |
| Richards ICE Futures | 109.45 | -0.05 |
| Aus Holdings | 251.06 | 9.50 | 453.70 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 295.37 | 261.73 |
| United States (USD) | |||||||
| 3M Co | 180.00 | 0.63 | 164.90 | 139.34 | 1.73 | 31.75 | 92.83 |
| Alberta Laboratories | 114.10 | -2.03 | 17.49 | 81.97 | 2.21 | 38.81 | 197.44 |
| Astrazeneca | 292.50 | -1.00 | 265.00 | 181.00 | 3.55 | 14.36 | 110.99 |
| Ascendria Finl. | 181.38 | -5.55 | 259.00 | 118.15 | 3.59 | 14.36 | 110.99 |
| Ashley | 237.44 | -0.45 | 37.06 | 190.12 | 0.00 | 15.64 | 108.70 |
| Allstate | 138.66 | 1.27 | 132.27 | 104.26 | 2.08 | 12.62 | 58.98 |
| Alstom Industrials & Chemicals | 238.86 | 2.49 | 263.20 | 158.81 | 3.55 | 14.36 | 110.99 |
| Aorbate A | 180.00 | -1.43 | 103.45 | 110.81 | 0.00 | 50.15 | 78.90 |
| Abercim B | 342.80 | -4.96 | 408.61 | 205.05 | 0.26 | 16.96 | 2006.96 |
| Alphabet C | 538.10 | -4.24 | 404.49 | 206.39 | 0.26 | 16.82 | 1874.21 |
| Altria Group | 68.12 | 1.05 | 77.06 | 34.70 | 6.13 | 14.43 | 115.41 |
| Amgen | 290.20 | -1.00 | 265.00 | 158.00 | 0.00 | 15.64 | 108.70 |
| American Express Electric Power | 132.36 | 0.59 | 145.58 | 100.00 | 3.08 | 21.28 | 671.16 |
| American Express | 336.15 | 0.20 | 301.49 | 205.97 | 1.13 | 21.81 | 227.01 |
| American Tower | 200.20 | -1.00 | 200.20 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 15.64 | 108.70 |
| American Tower | 175.73 | -2.84 | 209.10 | 160.06 | 3.97 | 24.11 | 61.98 |
| American Financial Services | 580.28 | 0.02 | 572.06 | 432.37 | 1.21 | 13.35 | 491.49 |
| AMT Ex Inc. | 245.20 | 3.43 | 301.16 | 179.24 | 0.05 | 35.74 | 56.21 |
| American Express Grp | 200.20 | -1.00 | 200.20 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 15.64 | 108.70 |
| Amphenol A | 161.24 | 0.56 | 173.82 | 110.54 | 0.31 | 38.41 | 109.93 |
| Analog Devices | 371.80 | -1.86 | 445.51 | 223.47 | 1.18 | 43.90 | 180.16 |
| Aon Plc A | 353.98 | -0.85 | 380.24 | 304.59 | 0.93 | 19.43 | 75.09 |
| Apploma Global S.p.A. | 133.67 | 1.51 | 132.27 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 61.19 | 59.76 |
| Apple | 314.45 | 3.55 | 344.57 | 224.69 | 0.34 | 35.78 | 454.55 |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 479.36 | -0.28 | 739.67 | 154.47 | 0.44 | 41.08 | 380.74 |
| Applied Micro devices | 308.11 | -2.43 | 74.65 | 297.50 | 0.00 | 23.59 | 93.80 |
| Airvana | 237.50 | -1.25 | 237.50 | 129.00 | 0.00 | 23.59 | 93.80 |
| Airvana Networks | 202.25 | 1.31 | 214.49 | 114.52 | 0.00 | 62.81 | 255.08 |
| Arthur J. Gallagher | 385.03 | -3.48 | 313.55 | 186.75 | 1.06 | 43.45 | 67.93 |
| AT&T | 25.67 | 0.10 | 29.79 | 196.89 | 4.29 | 8.54 | 177.27 |
| Autodesk | 257.45 | -1.55 | 239.09 | 188.50 | 0.00 | 36.92 | 53.76 |
| Auto Trader | 254.77 | 3.56 | 329.09 | 188.50 | 0.00 | 36.92 | 53.76 |
| Auto Data Processing | 281.39 | -1.39 | 305.31 | 188.16 | 2.45 | 25.65 | 111.79 |
| AucineB | 2899.80 | -28.34 | 4368.11 | 2992.20 | 0.00 | 30.12 | 48.96 |
| Bank of America | 157.68 | -0.57 | 163.69 | 105.52 | 0.00 | 16.88 | 105.52 |
| Bank of New York Mellon | 153.08 | -0.57 | 165.59 | 102.55 | 1.55 | 18.83 | 110.95 |
| Becton Dickinson | 190.21 | 0.43 | 213.08 | 140.11 | 2.21 | 32.79 | 51.81 |
| Berkeley Networks A | 7697.00 | 1582.00 | 6920.00 | 6880.00 | 0.88 | 85.2 | 30.16 |
| BlackRockwell Automation | 167.68 | -0.57 | 167.69 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 62.81 | 255.08 |
| BlackRockwell Finance | 1172.31 | -3.43 | 3219.94 | 917.38 | 1.55 | 27.68 | 181.59 |
| Blackstone | 143.20 | -0.21 | 190.09 | 101.73 | 2.31 | 32.04 | 107.49 |
| Boston | 83.10 | 0.38 | 86.75 | 48.21 | 0.00 | 143.28 | 44.94 |
| Boston Midstream | 212.10 | -0.65 | 233.65 | 146.42 | 0.00 | 14.83 | 108.83 |
| Boston Scientific | 62.23 | -1.30 | 65.22 | 46.12 | 0.00 | 14.14 | 45.16 |
| Booking Holdings | 2088.89 | -4.78 | 5276.18 | 1534.19 | 0.79 | 23.08 | 156.96 |
| Boston Scientific REIT | 48.17 | -1.69 | 105.50 | 422.20 | 0.00 | 19.35 | 68.91 |
| British American Equip | 67.57 | -0.35 | 68.64 | 42.52 | 3.73 | 14.83 | 338.03 |
| Caterpillar | 71.94 | -0.45 | 74.45 | 46.27 | 0.00 | 14.83 | 108.83 |
| Cadence Design Systems | 334.68 | 2.78 | 416.69 | 203.25 | 0.00 | 66.14 | 92.17 |
| Capital One Financial | 217.21 | 0.97 | 29.63 | 174.24 | 1.47 | 11.97 | 133.26 |
| Carrier global | 58.74 | 0.22 | 76.76 | 30.24 | 1.63 | 41.37 | 48.42 |
| Capitotruk | 71.94 | -0.45 | 74.65 | 46.27 | 0.00 | 14.83 | 108.83 |
| Canadigm Group A | 821.93 | 10.64 | 1073.46 | 410.51 | 0.79 | 35.22 | 277.82 |
| CBORE Group A | 156.26 | -1.38 | 174.27 | 131.69 | 0.00 | 36.75 | 43.54 |
| Cencora | 377.79 | -0.27 | 377.54 | 244.82 | 0.73 | 24.23 | 62.55 |
| Cencora Energy | 153.89 | -0.45 | 163.49 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 14.83 | 108.83 |
| Charles Hour Energy | 294.08 | 5.28 | 300.89 | 206.28 | 0.78 | 21.46 | 56.67 |
| Charteria Oceana | 200.31 | 0.32 | 214.71 | 146.49 | 3.56 | 19.21 | 395.57 |
| Chipotle Mexican Oil & Pte | 37.34 | -0.09 | 43.13 | 29.66 | 0.00 | 34.26 | 47.35 |
| Chubb | 243.74 | -1.87 | 267.54 | 166.69 | 0.00 | 24.83 | 108.83 |
| Cognizant | 205.78 | 1.02 | 219.16 | 161.16 | 1.01 | 41.40 | 82.35 |
| Circa Systems | 112.95 | 1.26 | 130.37 | 168.13 | 1.50 | 37.21 | 442.86 |
| Cirgab Inc. | 133.56 | 0.31 | 147.86 | 92.96 | 2.01 | 16.78 | 224.04 |
| Cigna Corp. | 234.85 | -0.65 | 266.75 | 169.89 | 0.00 | 24.83 | 108.83 |
| CNE Energy | 284.98 | 3.66 | 329.16 | 218.31 | 4.02 | 23.71 | 101.03 |
| Cognizant Serv S.p.A. | 62.08 | -0.97 | 87.03 | 37.08 | 2.13 | 13.37 | 27.97 |
| Conazole Global A | 161.78 | -0.38 | 402.26 | 181.11 | 0.00 | 46.97 | 40.50 |
| Conazole Global B | 92.08 | -0.97 | 97.03 | 47.08 | 2.01 | 13.37 | 27.97 |
| Conazole International | 32.10 | 0.10 | 34.45 | 21.29 | 7.48 | 8.69 | 96.27 |
| ConocoPhillips 1B Gas | 1302.13 | -1.23 | 133.88 | 88.57 | 2.57 | 17.28 | 156.91 |
| Constellation Energy | 279.52 | 1.10 | 412.70 | 228.63 | 0.81 | 27.30 | 90.04 |
| ConocoPhillips 2B Gas | 125.67 | -0.57 | 144.55 | 84.55 | 2.57 | 17.28 | 156.91 |
| ConocoPhillips 3B Gas | 152.78 | -0.72 | 268.79 | 176.14 | 0.73 | 68.82 | 131.60 |
| ConocoPhillips 4B Gas | 22.88 | -0.17 | 90.97 | 80.53 | 0.87 | 50.23 | 55.30 |
| Costco Wholesale, Inc.* | 958.21 | -3.89 | 1098.50 | 684.23 | 0.61 | 48.02 | 424.02 |
| Costco Holdings, Inc.* | 10.52 | -0.09 | 13.89 | 8.69 | 0.00 | 13.89 | 108.83 |
| Cheniere | 97.05 | 0.85 | 131.55 | 92.52 | 1.61 | 19.14 | 64.57 |
| CrowdStrike Holdings A: | |||||||
See FTSE website for more details www.ftse.com/products/indices/gilts. © 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC. All rights reserved. The Tradeweb FTSE Gilt Closing Prices information contained herein is proprietary to Tradeweb; may not be copied or re-distributed; is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely; and does not constitute investment advice. Tradeweb is not responsible for any loss or damage that might result from the use of this information.
| Base Metals | ||
| Aluminium | 3237.00 | 12.00 |
| Copper | 14298.00 | 45.00 |
| Lead | 1917.50 | 7.00 |
| Nickel | 16875.00 | -12.00 |
| Tin | 55375.00 | 548.00 |
| Zinc | 3879.50 | -13.50 |
| Energy | Price | Change |
| Brent Crude | 88.93 | 0.57 |
| Natural Gas | 2.88 | 0.04 |
| Light Crude Oil | 82.56 | 0.33 |
| 3.5 Fuel Oil | 493.24 | 0.09 |
| Euro Naphtha Oil | 744.43 | 0.69 |
BONDS: GLOBAL INVESTMENT GRADE
Tradeweb
| Agriculture | Price | Change |
| Corn | 512.25 | -1.75 |
| Wheat | 210.25 | 4.50 |
| Rapeseed | 541.25 | 3.00 |
| Sunflower Seed | 10251.00 | -33.00 |
| Soybeans | 1259.00 | 4.75 |
| Soybeans Meal | 330.00 | 1.30 |
| Cocoa (ICE Life) | 4149.00 | -4.00 |
| Cocoa (ICE US) | 6190.00 | 373.00 |
| Coffee (Robusta) | 3574.00 | -84.00 |
| Coffee (Arabica) | 406.00 | -13.65 |
| White Sugar | 514.00 | -3.00 |
| Sugar #11 | 17.95 | 0.36 |
| Cotton | 88.91 | 1.14 |
| Orange Juice | 138.15 | -2.80 |
| Maple Leaf | 4959.56 | 27.24 |
| Live Cattle | 221.10 | 2.63 |
| Feeder Cattle | 333.78 | 1.03 |
| Lean Hogs | 80.68 | -0.23 |
| Palm Oil (Malaysian) | 1177.00 | -0.75 |
| Stock | 52-Week | ||||||
| Price+/-Chg | +/-Week | +/-Yld | +/-Week | Yld | P/E | MCap m | |
| DHLX | 16.90 | 0.43 | 18.74 | 14.01 | 4.51 | 16.33 | 592.00 |
| Oracle | 14.87 | 4.11 | 14.57 | 114.50 | 1.34 | 25.06 | 428.82 |
| AT&T Automotive | 89.55 | -0.77 | 108.72 | 80.58 | 0.00 | 28.34 | 72.44 |
| Citic Worldwide | 73.26 | 0.90 | 94.56 | 69.16 | 2.43 | 20.56 | 27.55 |
| Eaton | 145.00 | -0.10 | 155.00 | 115.00 | 0.00 | 15.00 | 100.00 |
| PACIFIC | 129.23 | 0.01 | 139.24 | 92.25 | 1.08 | 27.15 | 68.02 |
| Palantir Systems A | 177.50 | -4.47 | 207.52 | 106.37 | 0.00 | 138.76 | 408.38 |
| Palo Alto Networks | 330.31 | -0.59 | 338.88 | 139.67 | 0.00 | 285.13 | 276.54 |
| Paychex | 103.45 | -0.01 | 108.85 | 83.00 | 0.00 | 16.88 | 114.00 |
| Paypal holdings | 124.88 | -0.11 | 133.83 | 85.45 | 3.81 | 25.49 | 44.42 |
| PayPal Holdings | 61.81 | -0.46 | 79.22 | 38.46 | 0.91 | 11.60 | 52.88 |
| PayPalA | 142.10 | -0.08 | 171.40 | 133.73 | 4.16 | 18.61 | 194.07 |
| Philip Morris Int'l | 109.40 | -0.05 | 118.00 | 85.00 | 0.00 | 16.88 | 114.00 |
| Philip Morris Intl | 194.10 | 0.18 | 207.76 | 142.11 | 3.03 | 27.89 | 302.53 |
| Phillips 66 | 242.23 | 5.33 | 246.95 | 136.74 | 2.10 | 13.78 | 96.65 |
| PHC Financial Services Gp | 244.67 | 0.56 | 256.86 | 136.86 | 3.77 | 32.46 | 97.61 |
| Philips 66 | 223.53 | -0.01 | 235.53 | 134.00 | 3.77 | 32.46 | 97.61 |
| Pepsico | 143.58 | -0.74 | 153.35 | 110.51 | 3.00 | 31.55 | 135.51 |
| Procter & Gamble | 120.24 | -0.04 | 127.72 | 91.89 | 4.66 | 10.84 | 41.48 |
| Public Storage | 377.37 | -5.30 | 335.50 | 205.56 | 3.78 | 30.17 | 59.18 |
| Qualcomm | 183.73 | -0.10 | 200.00 | 146.00 | 3.00 | 25.00 | 100.00 |
| Qualcomm B | 62.26 | -0.57 | 67.54 | 55.66 | 5.22 | 45.45 | 58.91 |
| Regeneron Pharma | 814.73 | -18.77 | 847.60 | 541.00 | 0.46 | 19.46 | 82.41 |
| Republic Services A | 222.18 | -1.22 | 225.16 | 189.41 | 1.21 | 34.47 | 68.03 |
| Robert Islander | 108.54 | -3.55 | 113.65 | 86.00 | 0.00 | 26.64 | 57.95 |
| S&P 500 | 37.56 | -0.01 | 40.00 | 33.88 | 0.00 | 26.64 | 57.95 |
| Roper Technologies | 413.28 | -0.59 | 532.16 | 305.86 | 0.95 | 17.15 | 40.87 |
| Ross Stores | 236.27 | -4.92 | 257.00 | 143.39 | 0.75 | 32.72 | 75.79 |
| Royal Dutch Corporation | 236.00 | -2.95 | 268.50 | 132.12 | 1.72 | 10.91 | 77.78 |
| S&P Global | 211.98 | -0.18 | 233.00 | 140.00 | 0.75 | 26.55 | 128.68 |
| SBA Comm | 436.49 | -3.50 | 504.56 | 381.61 | 0.89 | 26.55 | 128.68 |
| Salesforce | 205.62 | -0.07 | 209.11 | 146.32 | 0.86 | 23.72 | 168.40 |
| Schlumberger | 53.60 | 0.31 | 58.02 | 31.64 | 2.30 | 11.89 | 79.55 |
| ServiceNow | 65.23 | -0.01 | 70.00 | 48.00 | 0.00 | 16.88 | 114.00 |
| ServiceNow Inc | 125.80 | -1.20 | 173.63 | 91.63 | 0.00 | 74.44 | 130.08 |
| Simon Property Group | 271.11 | -1.88 | 238.50 | 172.19 | 4.15 | 15.32 | 70.25 |
| Store&Ap | 215.37 | -1.65 | 241.95 | 118.30 | 0.00 | 91.94 | 109.31 |
| Southern | 56.37 | -0.01 | 63.00 | 43.89 | 3.39 | 21.53 | 103.29 |
| Southern copper | 89.76 | -0.21 | 100.80 | 83.60 | 3.39 | 21.53 | 103.29 |
| Southern copper | 213.75 | -5.95 | 223.86 | 92.94 | 1.85 | 32.09 | 180.48 |
| Spotify Technology | 550.03 | -2.54 | 745.00 | 405.00 | 0.00 | 246.65 | 113.24 |
| Starbucks | 108.45 | -0.15 | 118.45 | 84.00 | 0.00 | 24.49 | 113.24 |
| Strategic A | 123.19 | -3.64 | 365.21 | 81.00 | 1.01 | 2.44 | 44.91 |
| Stryker | 226.97 | -0.92 | 396.86 | 261.00 | 1.07 | 33.88 | 126.45 |
| Sympey | 410.00 | 1.21 | 615.79 | 366.00 | 0.00 | 92.97 | 78.51 |
| Target Software | 294.03 | -0.29 | 394.03 | 244.00 | 0.00 | 14.88 | 114.00 |
| Target | 164.04 | 0.57 | 170.75 | 83.44 | 2.83 | 21.58 | 74.52 |
| TE Connectivity | 255.03 | 3.62 | 252.56 | 192.22 | 1.52 | 19.44 | 55.36 |
| Tesla | 345.82 | -4.43 | 408.83 | 297.38 | 0.00 | 250.07 | 1085.83 |
| Texas Instruments | 261.77 | -0.18 | 276.77 | 176.99 | 0.00 | 24.99 | 114.00 |
| The Alcatia | 281.41 | -6.19 | 277.22 | 188.08 | 1.65 | 51.18 | 66.20 |
| The Charles Schwab | 109.38 | -2.98 | 114.53 | 83.96 | 1.17 | 19.82 | 189.17 |
| The Cigna Group | 288.87 | 1.55 | 315.47 | 239.51 | 2.22 | 11.83 | 74.22 |
| The Elec Group | 80.08 | -0.10 | 86.06 | 64.57 | 2.15 | 16.47 | 32.42 |
| The Micron | 58.51 | 0.06 | 76.58 | 54.15 | 2.67 | 34.22 | 35.85 |
| The Danaher Willems | 348.68 | -1.79 | 377.77 | 289.86 | 0.92 | 31.87 | 84.64 |
| The Emerson Techs | 136.83 | -2.65 | 170.00 | 134.75 | 1.48 | 26.31 | 151.16 |
| The Home Corp | 74.47 | -0.13 | 86.55 | 63.45 | 2.46 | 24.99 | 119.99 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific | 633.73 | 5.56 | 641.00 | 457.27 | 0.30 | 34.05 | 234.31 |
| T-Mobile US | 179.61 | -2.00 | 258.66 | 165.66 | 2.27 | 18.75 | 192.66 |
| Trane Technologies | 463.40 | 8.15 | 536.97 | 348.09 | 0.91 | 35.13 | 101.96 |
| Unumis Reit Group Inc | 1337.56 | -1.89 | 1466.59 | 934.68 | 1.35 | 24.99 | 114.00 |
| United States Finl | 371.15 | 1.49 | 389.68 | 252.26 | 1.35 | 9.83 | 77.41 |
| Truist Financials | 50.67 | 0.37 | 56.20 | 40.78 | 4.19 | 11.40 | 61.90 |
| Uber Technologies | 78.49 | -1.86 | 101.98 | 65.41 | 0.00 | 16.99 | 160.32 |
| Union Pacific | 210.62 | 1.03 | 213.59 | 210.68 | 1.63 | 25.85 | 164.53 |
| United States Telecom B | 263.58 | -0.99 | 277.77 | 179.99 | 0.00 | 16.88 | 114.00 |
| United States Telecom B | 657.68 | 4.52 | 717.19 | 501.59 | 0.73 | 25.38 | 65.83 |
| UnitedHealth Group | 401.01 | 4.42 | 461.67 | 259.57 | 2.31 | 25.71 | 359.84 |
| US Bancorp | 62.80 | 0.38 | 66.08 | 45.02 | 3.31 | 12.53 | 91.85 |
| Vale on Paper Corp | 221.94 | -0.49 | 237.99 | 149.99 | 0.75 | 24.99 | 114.00 |
| Verizon Communications | 50.19 | -0.06 | 51.68 | 10.60 | 5.54 | 13.07 | 208.53 |
| Vertex Media Group A | 38.27 | -0.60 | 59.00 | 27.17 | 3.82 | 0.00 | 5.45 |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals | 547.26 | -5.55 | 556.69 | 373.47 | 0.00 | 31.62 | 136.72 |
| Visa 'a' | 263.58 | -0.39 | 277.77 | 179.99 | 0.00 | 16.88 | 114.00 |
| Viacom A | 140.02 | -1.00 | 219.82 | 132.66 | 0.66 | 23.34 | 47.00 |
| Walmart | 104.34 | -1.04 | 135.16 | 89.42 | 0.95 | 36.61 | 830.35 |
| Wal-Mart Stores | 121.23 | -0.62 | 171.78 | 92.19 | 1.37 | 22.51 | 189.30 |
| Wells Fargo | 85.23 | -0.44 | 97.76 | 72.38 | 2.35 | 12.25 | 257.74 |
| Wichoworme | 241.56 | 0.41 | 255.20 | 163.75 | 1.41 | 105.03 | 174.10 |
| Workday A | 190.75 | -3.67 | 249.65 | 153.06 | 0.00 | 58.06 | 38.34 |
| Workday B | 135.37 | -0.49 | 166.88 | 109.99 | 0.00 | 34.98 | 136.37 |
| Yum! Brands Inc | 154.41 | -1.86 | 170.14 | 137.33 | 1.94 | 19.33 | 42.14 |
| Zscaler A | 77.52 | 0.23 | 156.49 | 77.01 | 2.73 | 12.65 | 302.83 |
Sources: Energy: NYMEX. Base Metals: LME / London Metal Exchange. Corn, Wheat, Soybeans: CBOT. Live Cattle, Live Feeder, Lean Hogs: CME.
| Red Date | Coupon | Bid Price | Bid Yield | Daily | Weekly | |
| US$ | ||||||
| Morgan Stanley | 30/01 | 4.00 | 98.97 | 4.57 | 0.00 | 0.05 |
| Trust Finl Corp | 28/06 | 4.12 | 99.63 | 5.12 | -0.04 | -0.03 |
| National Rural | 32/11 | 4.02 | 94.55 | 5.27 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Washington Gaslight Co | 36/03 | 5.78 | 91.97 | 5.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Northern States Power | 28/03 | 8.13 | 100.66 | 5.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Oklahoma Gas & Elec | 28/04 | 6.50 | 103.01 | 4.58 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Euro | ||||||
| Germany | 25/08 | 2.22 | 89.34 | 2.89 | -0.05 | 0.03 |
| Spain | 46/10 | 2.88 | 82.64 | 4.19 | -0.17 | 0.13 |
| Belgium | 47/06 | 1.50 | 61.58 | 4.47 | -0.15 | 0.29 |
| France | 48/05 | 2.00 | 63.51 | 4.72 | -0.14 | 0.14 |
| £ Sterling | ||||||
| United Kingdom | 46/12 | 4.25 | 82.90 | 5.68 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| United Kingdom | 47/07 | 1.50 | 48.74 | 5.74 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
VOLATILITY INDICES
BONDS: BENCHMARK GOVERNMENT
| Aug 27 | Day Chg | Prev | 52 wk high | 52 wk low | |
| VIX | 14.52 | -0.69 | 15.21 | 35.30 | 13.38 |
| VXD | 13.12 | -0.54 | 13.66 | 42.71 | 2.43 |
| VDAX | 16.36 | 0.34 | 16.03 | 35.58 | 13.53 |
| Red Date | Coupon | Bid Price | Bid Yield | Daily yield chg | Wkly yield chg | Mthly yield chg | Year chg | |
| Australia | 06/54 | 4.75 | 88.01 | 5.61 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.36 |
| 04/27 | 4.75 | 100.02 | 4.71 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 1.34 | |
| Austria | 03/33 | 2.88 | 97.99 | 3.25 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.37 |
| 10/51 | 3.13 | 86.20 | 3.99 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.15 | |
| Belgium | 06/54 | 3.25 | 79.70 | 4.61 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.15 | 0.33 |
| Canada | 06/27 | 1.00 | 98.88 | 2.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | -0.18 |
| 10/55 | 2.75 | 77.09 | 3.93 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.15 | |
| Denmark | 11/33 | 2.25 | 95.59 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.20 |
| 11/49 | 4.50 | 113.60 | 3.20 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.07 | 0.27 | |
| Finland | 09/27 | 0.50 | 97.62 | 2.83 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.69 |
| 09/33 | 3.00 | 97.99 | 3.32 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.10 | 0.34 | |
| France | 05/54 | 3.00 | 72.23 | 4.84 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.21 | 0.40 |
| 11/33 | 3.50 | 98.49 | 3.74 | 0.01 | -0.02 | -0.76 | -0.46 | |
| Germany | 08/33 | 2.60 | 96.98 | 3.08 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.38 |
| 08/53 | 1.75 | 67.18 | 3.76 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.27 | |
| Greece | 06/28 | 3.88 | 101.33 | 3.09 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.65 |
| 06/33 | 4.25 | 103.40 | 3.67 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.39 | |
| Ireland | 10/33 | 0.25 | 84.23 | 3.23 | 0.10 | -0.05 | 0.25 | 0.60 |
| Italy | 12/27 | 2.63 | 99.68 | 2.92 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.68 |
| 03/34 | 4.13 | 102.75 | 3.81 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.50 | |
| Netherlands | 01/54 | 2.00 | 70.16 | 3.76 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
| 07/33 | 2.50 | 95.99 | 3.16 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.09 | 0.36 | |
| Poland | 04/28 | 2.75 | 97.59 | 4.29 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.44 |
| 10/33 | 6.00 | 102.10 | 5.63 | 0.05 | -0.02 | 0.25 | 0.70 | |
| Portugal | 07/28 | 1.63 | 91.71 | 3.20 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.42 |
| Spain | 10/52 | 1.88 | 62.48 | 4.32 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.28 |
| 10/33 | 3.50 | 100.87 | 3.41 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.10 | 0.35 | |
| Sweden | 11/33 | 1.15 | 96.35 | 4.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Switzerland | 03/36 | 2.50 | 119.99 | 0.32 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -0.22 | 0.49 |
| United Kingdom | 06/28 | 0.00 | 92.72 | 4.34 | 0.02 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.58 |
| 10/53 | 3.75 | 72.36 | 5.78 | -0.01 | -0.05 | 0.07 | 0.56 | |
| United States | 11/33 | 4.50 | 99.88 | 4.52 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.04 | 0.55 |
| 11/51 | 4.75 | 93.34 | 5.21 | -0.01 | -0.07 | 0.04 | 0.38 |
GILTS: UK CASH MARKET
| Aug 27 | Price | Yield | Red Yield | Day | Week | High | Low |
| Tr 1.25pc '27 | 97.45 | 1.28 | 4.21 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 97.50 | 95.36 |
| Tr 0.875pc '29 | 89.70 | 0.98 | 4.41 | -0.02 | 0.14 | 91.00 | 0.01 |
| Tr 1pc '32 | 82.70 | 1.21 | 4.64 | -0.04 | 0.17 | 85.07 | 81.01 |
| Tr 4.25pc '36 | 93.98 | 4.52 | 5.05 | -0.06 | 0.26 | 99.39 | 92.65 |
| Tr 4.5pc '42 | 88.95 | 5.06 | 5.54 | -0.05 | 0.37 | 96.45 | 87.54 |
| Tr 3.75pc '52 | 73.24 | 5.12 | 5.75 | 0.01 | 0.51 | 81.50 | 72.00 |
| Tr 4pc '60 | 74.38 | 5.38 | 5.73 | — | 0.54 | 83.52 | 73.28 |
Closing prices and highs & lows are in traded currency. Market capitalisations are in local currency. Highs & lows are based on a rolling 52 week period
GILTS: UK FTSE ACTUARIES INDICES
| Price IndicesFixed Coupon | Aug 27 | Dayschg % | TotalReturn | MonthReturn | YearReturn | Yield |
| Up to 5 Years | 84.77 | -0.04 | 2681.79 | 0.36 | 1.25 | 4.42 |
| 5-10 Years | 143.81 | -0.08 | 3404.73 | 0.19 | -0.33 | 4.87 |
| 10-15 Years | 142.25 | -0.11 | 3739.51 | -0.09 | -1.66 | 5.32 |
| 5-15 Years | 141.71 | -0.09 | 3476.69 | 0.10 | -0.75 | 5.05 |
| Over 15 Years | 165.50 | -0.09 | 3303.27 | -0.64 | -5.06 | 5.69 |
| All stocks | 125.46 | -0.06 | 3143.39 | 0.02 | -1.07 | 5.30 |
| Index Linked | Aug 27 | Day'schg % | Monthchg % | Year'schg % | TotalReturn | 1 Month | Return1 Year |
| Up to 5 Years | 362.83 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 2.14 | 3165.98 | 0.64 | 2.95 |
| Over 5 Years | 468.09 | 0.09 | 0.53 | -2.12 | 3683.67 | 0.54 | -1.69 |
| 5-15 Years | 458.77 | 0.13 | 0.70 | 1.30 | 3847.47 | 0.71 | 1.86 |
| Over 15 Years | 465.44 | 0.05 | 0.33 | -5.39 | 3510.09 | 0.34 | -5.07 |
| All stocks | 465.77 | 0.09 | 0.57 | -1.27 | 3722.23 | 0.58 | -0.77 |
| Yield Indices | Aug 27 | Aug 26 | Yr Ago |
| 5 Yrs | 4.59 | 4.57 | 4.26 |
| 10 Yrs | 5.09 | 5.07 | 4.59 |
| 15 Yrs | 5.44 | 5.43 | 4.88 |
| 20 Yrs | 5.62 | 5.61 | 5.02 |
| 45 Yrs | 5.56 | 5.55 | 4.91 |
| Real Yield 0% Inflation | Aug 27 | Dur Yrs | Previous | Yr Ago |
| Up to 5 Years | 1.02 | 2.71 | 1.04 | 0.73 |
| Over 5 Years | 2.31 | 16.31 | 2.31 | 1.90 |
| 5-15 Years | 1.97 | 9.55 | 1.98 | 1.61 |
| Over 15 Years | 2.45 | 23.05 | 2.46 | 2.01 |
| All stocks | 2.25 | 13.42 | 2.26 | 1.86 |
| Real Yield 5% Inflation | Aug 27 | Dur Yrs | Previous | Yr Ago |
| Up to 5 Years | 0.74 | 2.71 | 0.76 | 0.43 |
| Over 5 Years | 2.27 | 16.31 | 2.28 | 1.88 |
| 5-15 Years | 1.90 | 9.55 | 1.91 | 1.54 |
| Over 15 Years | 2.43 | 23.05 | 2.43 | 2.00 |
| All stocks | 2.20 | 13.42 | 2.21 | 1.82 |
FT
TIMES
FINANCIAL
Profit. Power. Politics.
| Braemar● | 227.00 | 6.00 | 260.00 | 203.11 | 3.08 | 31.35 | 15.17 |
| Fisher (J) | 436.00 | -5.00 | 554.00 | 325.00 | - | -50.11 | 100.24 |
| Price | +/- Chg | 52 Week | Yld | P/E | Vol 000s | |||
| High | Low | Yld | ||||||
| Aerospace & Defence | ||||||||
| BAE Systems | 2092.00 | 4.00 | 2360.00 | 1529.00 | 1.81 | 30.41 | 5403.93 | |
| Chemring Group* | 561.00 | 4.00 | 650.75 | 446.52 | 1.44 | 31.52 | 892.62 | |
| Automobiles & Parts | ||||||||
| Ford Motors* | 1035.89 | 12.97 | 1319.04 | 841.76 | 4.26 | -5.91 | -- | |
| Banks | ||||||||
| ANZ Group | 1930.48 | -18.00 | 2126.50 | 1590.55 | 5.97 | 19.73 | 3482.69 | |
| Banco Santander | 1070.00 | -20.00 | 1122.00 | 689.00 | 1.56 | 13.71 | 3855.47 | |
| BASF Securities, Scotia | 6838.80 | -61.62 | 6977.60 | 4559.15 | 3.55 | -- | -882.84 | |
| Barclays** | 4922.60 | -6.95 | 554.10 | 352.85 | 2.33 | 11.25 | 23155.85 | |
| Canadian Imperial | 8397.21 | -281.08 | 9198.88 | 5444.83 | 2.71 | 1427.74 | ||
| HSBC** | 1504.00 | -18.20 | 1610.00 | 942.80 | 3.67 | 16.89 | 14589.63 | |
| Hancock Grp | 13360.00 | -10.10 | 16240.80 | 11065.00 | 2.39 | 9.41 | 50.63 | |
| Lloyds Bng Gp.* | 1039.30 | -2.40 | 117.90 | 77.38 | 3.67 | 15.61 | 135410.10 | |
| NatWest Group* | 678.40 | -13.60 | 726.00 | 500.20 | 5.16 | 12.68 | 13321.31 | |
| OIB Group* | 512.50 | 2.00 | 647.50 | 478.00 | 7.00 | 6.78 | 1032.46 | |
| PPLB Group | 2528.00 | -0.33 | 2613.80 | 1529.29 | 0.62 | 6.46 | 211.05 | |
| Royal Bank of CA | 14998.50 | -263.99 | 16187.03 | 15032.21 | 2.49 | 1291.15 | ||
| Stand Chart* | 2147.00 | -35.00 | 2278.00 | 1351.30 | 2.58 | 14.92 | 6715.77 | |
| *3.75%UP | 112.25 | 0.25 | 128.64 | 109.50 | 6.57 | 69.45 | ||
| S&P 500 | 129.35 | -1.00 | 143.90 | 125.00 | 6.38 | 67.63 | ||
| Toronto-Dominion | 8824.79 | 37.91 | 9256.88 | 5736.30 | 2.61 | 1643.53 | ||
| Westpac | 1783.28 | -0.87 | 2275.39 | 1755.74 | 4.57 | 16.76 | 3504.56 | |
| Elementis● | 175.00 | -4.60 | 195.40 | 136.00 | 1.90 | -30.47 | 1351.12 |
| Johnson Matthey● | 2226.00 | -40.00 | 3245.25 | 2224.00 | 4.61 | -29.19 | 442.79 |
| Victrex | 836.00 | 6.00 | 841.00 | 515.00 | 7.12 | 26.12 | 214.92 |
| Construction & Materials | |||||||
| Guilliford Try Hldgs | 614.00 | -3.00 | 640.00 | 407.50 | 3.26 | 18.22 | 207.00 |
| Morgan Sindall | 4388.00 | -52.00 | 5730.00 | 3915.00 | 3.71 | 11.79 | 65.10 |
| Electronic & Electrical Equip | |||||||
| discoverE Grp | 822.00 | 21.00 | 840.00 | 505.00 | 1.58 | 27.22 | 213.67 |
| Halma | 3672.00 | 56.00 | 4902.00 | 3194.00 | 0.67 | 37.25 | 535.31 |
| Morgan Adv Mat | 237.50 | -3.50 | 261.00 | 179.80 | 5.14 | 31.67 | 1136.12 |
| Oxford Instruments | 2856.00 | 36.00 | 3318.00 | 1682.00 | 0.83 | 33.76 | 83.33 |
| Renishaw | 5145.00 | 25.00 | 5490.00 | 3110.00 | 1.52 | 44.66 | 45.31 |
| TT Electronics | 135.00 | - | 154.80 | 93.00 | - | -4.74 | 78.05 |
| XP Power | 1862.00 | 60.00 | 2060.00 | 843.00 | - | -44.33 | 232.43 |
| Financial General | ||||||
| 3i Group* | 2834.00 | -10.00 | 4497.00 | 18525.00 | 2.98 | -- |
| Aberdeen Group* | 251.00 | 1.40 | 265.00 | 177.52 | 5.62 | 11.62 |
| Bridgepoint Group | 318.80 | 4.00 | 351.80 | 212.00 | 2.98 | 63.76 |
| Cairo Group | 496.00 | 2.00 | 496.00 | 248.00 | 6.63 | 18.80 |
| Close Bros | 413.00 | -7.00 | 556.15 | 318.40 | -- | 6.17 |
| ICICI | 2008.00 | -4.00 | 2340.00 | 1243.47 | 4.33 | 12.04 |
| Investec+ | 645.00 | 5.50 | 690.00 | 498.36 | 5.97 | 8.37 |
| Jupiter+ | 172.60 | -0.20 | 214.50 | 113.40 | 3.48 | 8.99 |
| Liontrust | 318.50 | -1.00 | 318.50 | 103.00 | 5.97 | 20.68 |
| London Stock Ex.* | 8980.00 | 292.00 | 10140.00 | 6684.00 | 1.76 | 37.67 |
| Rehbones Group | 1710.00 | 10.00 | 2500.00 | 1568.00 | 5.85 | 15.85 |
| S & U | 1975.00 | 10.00 | 2458.50 | 1620.00 | 5.82 | 10.12 |
| Schroders | 584.00 | 6.50 | 599.50 | 359.60 | 3.77 | 17.13 |
| The Bounces/Plc* | 1176.50 | -5.50 | 12575.50 | 1028.75 | 1.53 | 11.76 |
| TP ICAP Group | 339.80 | 2.60 | 355.00 | 235.50 | 5.08 | 13.48 |
| Varlequis Banking Gp | 79.50 | -0.50 | 132.00 | 75.00 | 24.84 | |
| Price | +/- Dly Chg | 52 Week | Vol000s | ||||
| High | Low | Yld | P/E | ||||
| Aerospace & Defence | |||||||
| Cohort* | 1236.00 | 20.00 | 1538.00 | 881.10 | 1.45 | 23.66 | 70.04 |
| Velocity Composites | 19.50 | 0.25 | 25.00 | 12.00 | - | -9.25 | 31.96 |
| Electric Resources (€ Million) | |||||||
| Cropper J | $15.00 | 35.00 | $25.00 | 230.00 | - | 16.72 | 29.07 |
| Construction & Materials | |||||||
| Accsys Tech | 69.20 | -1.50 | 79.84 | 58.10 | - | 30.23 | 24.52 |
| Electronic & Electrical Equip | |||||||
| Checklist | 20.00 | - | 27.00 | 12.35 | - | -7.69 | 26.30 |
| LPA | 77.50 | - | 90.00 | 34.00 | - | -29.36 | 1.26 |
| Thorpe FW | 260.00 | -2.50 | 320.00 | 240.00 | 2.76 | 11.99 | 30.64 |
| Financial General | |||||||
| Arbutnot Banking‡ | 810.00 | -10.00 | 1104.38 | 765.00 | 6.79 | 7.42 | 16.76 |
Investment Companies
| Price | +/- Chg | 52 Week | Yld | NAV | Div ($) | |||
| High | Low | Yld | ||||||
| Conventional (Ex Private Equity) | ||||||||
| 3i Infra | 395.50 | 2.00 | 399.50 | 325.00 | 3.40 | 403.96 | -1.96 | - |
| Alt GVIIT | 91.75 | 1.25 | 96.77 | 76.00 | 6.65 | 102.24 | -10.70 | - |
| AEP Inc | 1775.00 | -0.00 | 1788.00 | 1088.07 | 2.89 | 155.27 | -10.10 | - |
| Aberdeen Asia Foc | 450.00 | 2.00 | 464.00 | 342.00 | 1.43 | 495.58 | -9.16 | - |
| Aberdeen Asian Inc Fund | 319.00 | 2.00 | 357.00 | 236.00 | 5.88 | 341.37 | -7.49 | - |
| Aberdeen Eq Inc | 459.00 | -8.00 | 473.00 | 359.25 | 5.03 | 462.08 | 0.19 | - |
| Aberdeen UK Smil | 529.00 | — | 539.00 | 441.50 | 2.65 | 579.40 | -8.01 | - |
| Alliance Witan | 1373.00 | -9.00 | 1394.00 | 1178.00 | 2.14 | 1445.51 | -5.32 | - |
| Asht Tech | 699.00 | 13.00 | 764.00 | 688.00 | 16.25 | 632.85 | -6.68 | - |
| Artemis UK Future Lead | 402.00 | 0.00 | 405.00 | 321.00 | 3.84 | 443.73 | -9.91 | - |
| Aurora UK Alpha | 258.00 | -2.00 | 279.00 | 222.09 | 1.82 | 290.81 | -10.93 | - |
| AVI Japan | 173.00 | 1.00 | 194.00 | 154.50 | 1.27 | 179.31 | -2.89 | - |
| BG China Growth | 307.50 | -1.00 | 331.04 | 277.00 | 0.81 | 336.77 | -9.02 | - |
| BG Euro | 126.50 | — | 133.00 | 91.40 | 0.57 | 137.08 | -7.71 | - |
| BG United Kingdom | 1066.00 | -2.00 | 1090.00 | 811.10 | 0.94 | 1179.34 | -9.69 | - |
| BG Shin | 172.60 | 0.80 | 176.00 | 123.05 | 0.40 | 190.54 | -10.71 | - |
| BG US Growth | 337.00 | -4.50 | 369.50 | 261.00 | — | 355.83 | -6.61 | - |
| Bailie Gifford UK | 227.00 | -1.00 | 231.00 | 180.12 | 2.73 | 250.75 | -9.56 | - |
| Bankers IT | 151.00 | 0.80 | 154.80 | 121.79 | 1.87 | 164.49 | -8.91 | - |
| Biotech Growth | 1768.00 | 22.00 | 1786.00 | 876.00 | — | 1882.92 | -6.54 | - |
| BlackRock Smir | 280.00 | -2.00 | 289.50 | 251.00 | 5.32 | 277.08 | -14.95 | - |
| BCKR Energy & Res | 186.50 | — | 205.00 | 123.00 | 3.11 | 195.31 | -4.58 | - |
| BCKR Front | 193.50 | 1.50 | 208.00 | 164.50 | 3.93 | 195.28 | -1.49 | - |
| BCKR GEur | 607.00 | -4.00 | 625.00 | 506.95 | 1.18 | 654.24 | -6.52 | - |
| BCKR BIG | 231.00 | -3.00 | 240.00 | 200.00 | 3.33 | 263.46 | -11.02 | - |
| BCKR Smir | 277.00 | -1.50 | 288.40 | 238.60 | 2.86 | 318.13 | -12.38 | - |
| BOKFIELD World Mining | 1048.00 | -14.00 | 1072.00 | 844.00 | 2.29 | 1173.88 | -4.80 | - |
| Brunner | 1566.00 | -8.00 | 1584.00 | 1336.00 | 1.72 | 1749.89 | -10.35 | - |
| Caledonia Inv | 397.00 | 2.00 | 402.00 | 312.00 | 1.94 | 584.38 | -33.09 | - |
| CanGen C$ | 2628.46 | -45.41 | 2864.58 | 2238.75 | 2.33 | 364.48 | -42.38 | - |
| City of Lon | 589.00 | -4.00 | 599.00 | 486.00 | 3.76 | 562.34 | 1.77 | - |
| CCG NetRes | 400.00 | 5.00 | 467.00 | 208.33 | 6.58 | 437.84 | 3.89 | - |
| CCT Healthcare | 138.60 | -1.21 | 152.40 | 124.40 | 3.85 | 140.66 | -6.21 | - |
| CT Mgd | 131.00 | — | 135.00 | 114.00 | 6.11 | 134.18 | -2.14 | - |
| CT MgG | 326.00 | 1.00 | 330.00 | 270.00 | — | 336.75 | -3.30 | - |
| CT CpM | 358.00 | -3.00 | 373.00 | 320.00 | 3.72 | 378.22 | -4.34 | - |
| CT UK HIT 8 | 109.00 | — | 120.00 | 92.00 | 5.47 | 120.96 | -10.09 | - |
| CT UK HIT Oid | 119.00 | — | 126.00 | 97.00 | 5.01 | 120.98 | -1.76 | - |
| EQT Group Inc | 317.00 | -4.00 | 323.00 | 255.00 | 6.36 | 347.24 | -7.43 | - |
| Edinburgh Inv | 859.00 | -4.00 | 867.00 | 737.60 | 3.73 | 928.53 | -7.30 | - |
| Edin Worldwide | 265.50 | -3.00 | 294.50 | 188.20 | — | 285.17 | -7.31 | - |
| The Euro SmCo | 240.00 | 1.50 | 247.21 | 193.80 | 5.27 | 264.00 | -9.86 | - |
| F&C Inv Trust | 342.50 | -0.40 | 332.00 | 325.80 | 1.22 | 374.89 | -8.58 | - |
| Fiatry Global Inc | 624.00 | -0.85 | 672.50 | 541.06 | 3.29 | 617.63 | -4.89 | - |
| Fidelity China | 262.50 | -0.50 | 339.00 | 241.01 | 3.43 | 282.68 | -7.44 | - |
| Fidelity EnerMkts | 1502.00 | 2.00 | 1574.00 | 836.00 | 1.32 | 1597.16 | -5.98 | - |
| Fidelity Euro | 437.50 | -3.50 | 447.50 | 367.50 | 2.26 | 462.80 | -4.86 | - |
| Price+/- | 52 Week | Vol000s | ||||
| High | Low | Yld | P/E | |||
| Food & Beverages | ||||||
| AEP Plantations | 195.20 | -0.40 | 229.00 | 117.37 | 3.12 | 11.46 |
| Assoc. Brit Foods | 2064.00 | -15.00 | 2359.00 | 1729.45 | 3.05 | 14.58 |
| Ban (AS) | 600.00 | -0.00 | 715.32 | 499.00 | 3.12 | 14.10 |
| Fevara | 140.50 | 1.50 | 149.50 | 114.50 | 1.71 | 6.08 |
| Coca-Cola HBC | 4564.00 | -102.00 | 5195.00 | 3270.00 | 2.25 | 20.59 |
| Cranovskl.* | 5380.00 | - | 5810.00 | 4755.00 | 2.09 | 18.18 |
| Diageo* | 1701.50 | -35.00 | 2109.00 | 1295.50 | 2.16 | 29.59 |
| Carmara | 264.60 | -0.60 | 307.50 | 191.10 | 0.96 | 20.06 |
| Kerry Group | 7253.71 | 228.24 | 7646.35 | 5567.81 | 1.70 | 21.14 |
| Tate & Lyle | 554.50 | - | 580.00 | 319.43 | 3.57 | 25.20 |
| Unilever*. | 4752.00 | -20.00 | 5542.11 | 3644.00 | 3.47 | 12.80 |
| GN Store Nord | 1102.65 | 25.93 | 1429.97 | 984.75 | 14.16 | 685.75 |
| Smith&Neph | 1072.50 | 1.50 | 1441.50 | 1046.00 | 2.73 | 20.202.948.64 |
| House, Leisure & Pers Goods | ||||||
| Barratt Redrow | 319.50 | -2.70 | 410.29 | 235.40 | 5.35 | 23.497.017 |
| Bellway | 2168.00 | -34.00 | 2890.00 | 1715.00 | 3.32 | 16.31.268.98 |
| Caterpillar | 3542.00 | -1.79 | 4442.00 | 2866.00 | - | 206.71.068.71 |
| Berberry Group | 1072.00 | -16.00 | 1376.50 | 976.00 | - | 906.71.068.71 |
| Cairn Homes | 221.00 | - | 228.00 | 161.00 | 3.88 | 12.10.91.82 |
| BlackRock WorksHops | 16320.00 | -480.00 | 2,540.00 | 14570.00 | 31.34 | 29.38.50.00 |
| Gleeson (MJ) | 277.00 | 2.50 | 435.00 | 221.00 | 3.97 | 10.22.13.04 |
| Headlam Group | 9.32 | -1.13 | 76.00 | 4.64 | -0.09 | 987.41.00 |
| McBride | 167.40 | -0.80 | 172.66 | 108.20 | 1.79 | 8.58.110.30 |
| McKesson | 1980.00 | -1.79 | 2413.40 | 1708.30 | 3.66 | 45.44.1448.88 |
| PZ Cussons | 103.60 | -1.40 | 114.00 | 65.00 | 3.57 | 22.04.43.00 |
| Vistry Group | 303.00 | -10.80 | 746.40 | 220.00 | 7.18 | 22022.88 |
| Bodycote | 911.50 | 1.50 | 935.00 | 585.00 | 2.56 | 29.40 | 557.81 |
| Goodwin | 18200.00 | -40.00 | 28500.00 | 9292.59 | 1.54 | 55.63 | 7.60 |
| Hill & Smith | 2945.00 | 10.00 | 3220.00 | 1994.00 | - | 28.68 | 66.03 |
| IMI+ | 3124.00 | -14.00 | 3166.00 | 2216.00 | 1.13 | 25.13 | 1951.06 |
| Melrose+ | 509.00 | -2.00 | 685.00 | 409.90 | 1.47 | 17.55 | 4494.68 |
| RH+ | 2780.00 | -70.00 | 3390.00 | 1920.00 | 5.55 | 17.81 | 18.45 |
| Weir | 2852.00 | -48.00 | 3580.00 | 2254.00 | 1.48 | 29.80 | 899.25 |

| Coats Group | 81.95 | 0.25 | 98.10 | 73.15 | 2.99 | 18.83 | 1681.65 |
| Macfarlane | 74.20 | -0.20 | 99.00 | 59.80 | 4.93 | 18.60 | 386.08 |
| Smiths | 2626.00 | -1.00 | 2754.18 | 2088.00 | 1.78 | 30.64 | 624.14 |
| Industrial Transportation | |||||||
| Insurance | |||||||
| Admiral Group | 4076.00 | -52.00 | 4128.00 | 2624.00 | 3.52 | 16.54 | 1136.79 |
| Aviva | 722.00 | -7.20 | 740.60 | 590.60 | 5.57 | 26.84 | 3437.13 |
| Chesnara | 359.00 | 9.50 | 359.50 | 264.58 | 6.40 | -71.09 | 1608.57 |
| Ecclesiastical Insurance | 140.25 | -0.75 | 155.00 | 135.00 | 6.15 | — | 41.53 |
| Hansard Global | 51.75 | 0.75 | 57.00 | 43.20 | 8.60 | 39.81 | 1.34 |
| Hiscox* | 1835.00 | — | 1904.00 | 1257.18 | 2.11 | 13.79 | 909.09 |
| Lancashire Hldgs* | 615.00 | 4.50 | 700.00 | 549.00 | 2.73 | 6.90 | 414.93 |
| Legal & General* | 291.20 | 0.10 | 318.10 | 217.20 | 7.52 | 29.15 | 19919.31 |
| Old Mutual | 58.40 | 0.40 | 78.80 | 54.00 | 6.95 | 6.44 | 75.50 |
| Prudential | 1013.50 | -26.00 | 1238.00 | 910.20 | 2.02 | 8.93 | 10045.62 |
| Standard Life | 929.50 | -6.00 | 948.50 | 615.00 | 5.96 | -197.35 | 962.85 |
| Price | +/- Dly Chg | 52 Week | Yld | P/E | Vol 000s | |||
| High | Low | |||||||
| BP Marsh | 680.00 | - | 710.00 | 613.00 | 5.34 | 5.13 | 7.12 | |
| Burlap Capital | 322.80 | 5.40 | 1054.00 | 279.80 | 2.92 | 15.12 | 115.59 | |
| Premier Group (Group) | 39.60 | 0.85 | 67.00 | 34.53 | 7.58 | 50.77 | 161.16 | |
| Food & Beverages | ||||||||
| Camellia | 5650.00 | - | 6300.00 | 4800.00 | 4.60 | -30.26 | 0.13 | |
| Fevertree Drinks | 853.00 | -2.00 | 973.00 | 711.00 | 2.03 | 45.42 | 170.39 | |
| Nichols* | 1155.00 | - | 1250.00 | 880.00 | 3.37 | 19.69 | 35.12 | |
| House, Leisure & Pers Goods | ||||||||
| Churchill | 370.00 | - | 460.00 | 271.00 | 5.66 | 9.32 | 5.00 | |
| Frontier Dev | 416.00 | -7.00 | 588.56 | 302.00 | - | 9.81 | 102.66 | |
| Portmeira | 53.00 | - | 138.00 | 47.14 | - | -1.11 | 51.94 | |
| Sanderson Design Grp | 77.00 | -1.00 | 80.00 | 40.00 | 1.95 | 25.84 | 335.04 | |
| Industrial Engineering | ||||||||
| MS Int* | 1690.00 | - | 1800.00 | 1120.00 | 1.54 | 25.07 | 5.09 | |
| Price | +/- Chg | 52 Week | Yld | P/E | Div. P/ | |||
| High | Low | Yld | ||||||
| Fidelity Spec | 473.50 | -3.00 | 479.50 | 372.00 | 2.18 | 473.42 | 0.66 | |
| Finsbury G&I | 834.00 | 5.00 | 902.00 | 706.25 | 2.42 | 807.64 | -6.74 | |
| Finsale Oil & Gas Co | 194.00 | -4.60 | 198.00 | 162.72 | 1.62 | 203.51 | -5.40 | |
| GRTI (supp) | 1.25 | - | 1.25 | 1.25 | - | 14.40 | -91.32 | |
| Hansa | 332.00 | -6.00 | 346.00 | 250.00 | 1.33 | 543.81 | -38.94 | |
| Hansa A | 325.00 | -5.00 | 335.00 | 244.00 | 1.35 | 543.81 | -40.23 | |
| Hen FarEs | 261.00 | -2.50 | 281.50 | 229.00 | 9.60 | 252.48 | 4.43 | |
| Hen High Inc | 208.00 | 1.00 | 214.00 | 173.35 | 5.35 | 219.08 | -4.38 | |
| Hen Smir | 967.00 | -1.00 | 998.00 | 850.00 | 2.94 | 1072.09 | -8.22 | |
| Henkel | 2980.00 | 30.00 | 3290.73 | 2285.00 | - | 3330.66 | -9.63 | |
| HICL Infra | 136.20 | -3.20 | 141.00 | 107.20 | 6.24 | 159.43 | -13.32 | |
| Impax Env | 448.00 | 3.00 | 494.76 | 379.00 | 1.14 | 507.23 | -12.07 | |
| Indiotech | 1140.00 | 5.00 | 1235.00 | 667.50 | 2.75 | 1207.54 | -6.05 | |
| Intl FP | 139.00 | -0.60 | 145.80 | 115.60 | 6.32 | 150.85 | -6.77 | |
| Inv Asia Dragon Tst | 488.50 | -1.50 | 519.00 | 389.00 | 3.85 | 513.95 | -6.39 | |
| Int'l Bond Inc | 171.00 | -0.50 | 178.50 | 150.11 | 7.16 | 168.77 | 1.53 | |
| JPM Amer IT | 1216.00 | 6.00 | 1258.00 | 1041.00 | 0.95 | 1244.94 | -2.76 | |
| JPM Asia G&I | 584.00 | - | 652.00 | 398.00 | 5.33 | 598.40 | -1.65 | |
| JPM China G&I | 273.00 | 2.00 | 313.00 | 259.50 | 4.97 | 333.42 | -10.19 | |
| JPM Cleve | 978.00 | -6.00 | 986.00 | 791.74 | 3.73 | 997.69 | -1.69 | |
| JPM&D Core | 84.20 | - | 86.60 | 58.00 | - | - | - | |
| JPM Emrg EMEA | 239.50 | - | 310.00 | 181.65 | 0.25 | 71.39 | 245.65 | |
| JPM Emrg | 167.20 | 0.60 | 181.20 | 118.40 | 4.50 | 181.58 | -7.86 | |
| JPM Eur Disc | 637.00 | -3.00 | 666.00 | 548.00 | 2.51 | 694.01 | -7.84 | |
| JPM Eur G&I | 147.00 | -1.40 | 153.00 | 124.50 | 3.70 | 151.12 | -1.75 | |
| JPM Em Mk Div | 210.00 | 1.00 | 221.00 | 148.00 | 2.86 | 228.96 | -8.50 | |
| JPM Em S&I G&I | 416.00 | -0.50 | 641.00 | 479.60 | 4.03 | 472.73 | -1.74 | |
| JPM India Gwth Inc | 875.00 | 1.00 | 1098.00 | 799.00 | 5.07 | 954.03 | -8.29 | |
| JPM Japan | 815.00 | 3.00 | 867.00 | 661.00 | 1.07 | 879.37 | -7.31 | |
| JPM UK Sm | 355.00 | -1.50 | 369.00 | 287.92 | 4.20 | 381.64 | -6.19 | |
| JPM US Sml | 439.00 | 3.00 | 463.00 | 365.00 | 0.73 | 480.76 | -9.50 | |
| Law Deb | 1248.00 | -8.00 | 1298.00 | 977.40 | 2.96 | 1232.14 | 1.53 | |
| Lowell Trust Sn | 560.00 | 2.00 | 798.00 | 686.00 | 5.00 | 787.50 | -18.29 | |
| Lowland | 187.00 | -0.50 | 191.50 | 145.50 | 3.62 | 204.63 | -8.33 | |
| Marwyn Val | 138.50 | - | 137.78 | 137.78 | 6.54 | 258.24 | -46.36 | |
| Mercantile | 288.50 | - | 290.50 | 234.31 | 2.86 | 319.05 | -9.51 | |
| Merch. Trst | 684.00 | -4.00 | 691.00 | 536.00 | 4.34 | 721.55 | -4.69 | |
| Mid Wynd | 796.00 | 4.00 | 804.00 | 682.00 | 1.05 | 810.37 | -2.46 | |
| Metast Int | 1629.00 | -4.00 | 1664.00 | 1366.00 | 0.96 | 1712.61 | -5.47 | |
| Montanaro Eur | 179.00 | 1.50 | 189.00 | 142.00 | 0.87 | 194.12 | -8.22 | |
| Murray Inc | 997.00 | -5.00 | 1038.00 | 854.66 | 4.11 | 1076.44 | -6.82 | |
| Murray Intl | 374.00 | -1.50 | 376.00 | 293.00 | 3.42 | 369.98 | 1.21 | |
| New Star IT | 142.00 | 1.50 | 148.00 | 108.00 | 2.50 | 198.86 | -31.61 | |
| N. Atl Smi IT | 425.00 | 1.00 | 434.00 | 328.00 | 1.65 | 634.85 | -33.05 | |
| Par. Heinzl | 1124.00 | -2.00 | 1262.00 | 852.00 | 0.13 | 1245.40 | -10.11 | |
| Peru Assets | 556.00 | 3.00 | 558.00 | 512.00 | 1.01 | 555.37 | -0.09 | |
| Polar Health | 454.50 | -0.50 | 460.50 | 340.00 | 0.48 | 450.44 | 1.53 | |
| Polar Fin. | 253.00 | - | 256.00 | 199.16 | - | 257.31 | -1.67 | |
IS YOUR SHARE PRICE BEING NOTICED?
The Financial Times Share Service sections help you to reach and engage financially aware decision-makers and affluent shareholders from across the world in print and online.
| Price | +/- Day Chg | 52 Week | |||||
| High | Low | Yld | P/E | 000s | |||
| Leisure | |||||||
| ME Group | 128.00 | 2.00 | 206.50 | 98.50 | 6.55 | 8.53 | 540.08 |
| Media | |||||||
| Autotradnr Grp* | 536.20 | -3.00 | 628.80 | 418.80 | 2.16 | 15.69 | 2628.38 |
| Informa* | 891.20 | -2.40 | 1000.00 | 719.00 | 2.52 | - | 1784.07 |
| ITV | 71.35 | -0.60 | 87.35 | 65.70 | 7.01 | 12.09 | 6105.39 |
| Pearson* | 1229.50 | 12.00 | 1337.00 | 874.80 | 2.08 | 23.92 | 741.14 |
| RiotDi* | 42.75 | -0.25 | 73.70 | 40.10 | 13.86 | -1.02 | 644.81 |
| Relitix* | 2668.00 | -57.00 | 3575.00 | 1991.00 | 2.59 | 23.69 | 3175.59 |
| Shinzhove | 513.60 | 4.60 | 769.60 | 391.40 | 2.10 | 18.29 | 3711.76 |
| STV Group | 109.50 | 0.50 | 129.50 | 95.60 | - | 10.14 | 77.87 |
| WPP | 384.30 | 3.00 | 412.60 | 218.50 | 3.90 | 7.64 | 2968.61 |
To advertise contact carol.ramsey@ft.com
| Anglo American* | 4243.00 | 23.00 | 4280.00 | 2196.00 | 0.68 | -17.42 | 7068.83 |
| Antofagasta | 4039.00 | 15.00 | 4475.00 | 2115.00 | 1.42 | 40.70 | 496.21 |
| BHP Group | 3547.00 | 12.00 | 3589.00 | 1918.00 | 3.57 | 24.88 | 1114.33 |
| Ferrexpo# | 28.58 | - | 87.23 | 27.20 | - | -4.56 | - |
| Fresnillo* | 3170.00 | 44.00 | 4472.00 | 1712.00 | 3.53 | 22.93 | 593.71 |
| Glencoreo* | 595.30 | -3.50 | 707.20 | 281.93 | 2.10 | - | 17700.74 |
| Harmony | 1569.06 | -83.13 | 1963.66 | 946.96 | 3.75 | 14.74 | 6664.69 |
| Rio Tinto** | 7688.00 | -34.00 | 9117.00 | 4528.00 | 4.45 | 17.02 | 1513.73 |
| BP●● | 515.40 | -7.30 | 609.40 | 399.35 | 4.80 | — | 31099.68 |
| Capricorn | 343.00 | — | 384.00 | 181.80 | — | 16.64 | 42.16 |
| ExxonMobil Hldgs● | 11601.00 | — | 11646.60 | 11496.00 | 2.61 | — | — |
| GeoPark● | 715.63 | — | 715.63 | 703.85 | 0.95 | 11.85 | — |
| Hellenic Energy | 1298.98 | — | 1310.13 | 1285.26 | 3.96 | 5.21 | 286.91 |
| Imperial Oil C$ | 9628.71 | -28.02 | 10397.16 | 6229.98 | 1.92 | — | 238.63 |
| TC Energy Corp | 4577.06 | — | 4658.86 | 4557.41 | 4.07 | -24.87 | 427.71 |
| AstraZeneca● | 12114.00 | -120.00 | 15732.00 | 9892.00 | 1.97 | 24.93 | 3580.59 |
| Chemical Works | 3127.84 | - | 3127.84 | 3127.84 | 4.92 | 15.94 | - |
| GlaxoSmKline● | 1852.00 | -47.50 | 2282.00 | 1440.29 | 3.78 | 13.13 | 3594.88 |
| Hikma Pharm● | 1628.00 | -12.00 | 1865.00 | 1187.00 | 3.89 | 12.15 | 445.43 |
| RCTS | |||||||
| British Land | 427.60 | -4.00 | 451.60 | 318.60 | 5.41 | - | - |
| Derwent London | 2050.00 | -14.00 | 2196.00 | 1469.33 | 4.00 | - | - |
| Great Portland Est | 340.60 | -6.60 | 377.00 | 270.00 | 2.41 | - | 0.00 |
| Land Securities | 686.50 | -10.00 | 726.00 | 522.50 | 6.00 | - | - |
| LondonMetric Prop | 189.40 | -5.30 | 216.20 | 175.30 | 6.63 | - | - |
| Primary Health Prop | 96.00 | -0.85 | 109.60 | 87.40 | 7.60 | - | - |
| Segro | 964.00 | -7.00 | 997.40 | 603.00 | 3.27 | - | - |
| Shaftesbury Capital+ | 147.90 | -3.40 | 155.10 | 124.10 | 2.91 | 7.91 | 2374.68 |
| Tritax Big Box | 159.00 | -1.30 | 175.00 | 132.20 | 5.19 | - | - |
| Grainger | 173.10 | -2.20 | 202.79 | 149.44 | 4.85 | 6.32 | 3067.48 |
| Harworth Group | 180.00 | 2.00 | 185.00 | 116.80 | 0.99 | 62.07 | 91.61 |
| Helical | 200.00 | -3.00 | 236.25 | 180.60 | 1.31 | 41.41 | 69.84 |
| Mountview Estates | 8750.00 | 150.00 | 10200.00 | 8350.00 | 6.00 | 16.76 | 0.01 |
| Savills● | 1050.00 | -8.00 | 1142.00 | 791.46 | 2.24 | 20.19 | 246.97 |
| Sirius Real Estate | 96.65 | -0.90 | 113.00 | 86.80 | 5.68 | 7.44 | 7530.54 |
| Smart (J) | 115.00 | - | 140.00 | 106.00 | 2.83 | 8.80 | 5.00 |
| Price | +/- Dly Dsg | 52 Week | Yld | P/E | Vol 000s | ||
| High | Low | ||||||
| Retailers | |||||||
| Caffyns | 500.00 | — | 550.00 | 350.00 | 2.00 | -12.29 | 0.00 |
| Dunelm Group | 874.00 | -17.50 | 1246.00 | 707.00 | 8.01 | 11.32 | 385.53 |
| Halfords Group● | 267.00 | 26.00 | 274.50 | 123.80 | 3.37 | 17.57 | 4105.34 |
| Inchosp● | 837.50 | -0.50 | 895.00 | 640.50 | 4.01 | 11.55 | 480.94 |
| JD Sports | 86.44 | -1.42 | 106.18 | 63.98 | 1.39 | 10.02 | 10086.13 |
| Kingfisher | 318.30 | -4.50 | 372.30 | 240.30 | 3.90 | 22.74 | 2960.13 |
| Marks & Spencer | 391.40 | -2.80 | 418.33 | 301.10 | 1.07 | 30.82 | 21894.82 |
| Saga | 687.00 | -1.00 | 747.00 | 192.80 | — | — | 134.12 |
| Sainsbury J | 332.10 | -1.50 | 380.30 | 292.27 | 4.13 | 19.20 | 4518.56 |
| Tesco | 455.00 | -5.40 | 510.40 | 411.70 | 3.19 | 16.55 | 13142.69 |
| Bond | 2782.00 | -4.00 | 2898.00 | 1981.00 | 2.66 | 19.73 | 413.02 |
| Capita | 280.00 | -2.00 | 416.00 | 215.00 | - | 1.94 | 753.26 |
| DCC Energy | 6390.00 | 20.00 | 6740.00 | 4188.00 | 3.39 | - | 235.33 |
| Diploma | 7290.00 | -65.00 | 7765.00 | 4970.00 | 0.87 | 52.86 | 650.54 |
| Essentra | 111.40 | 1.20 | 115.20 | 78.40 | 1.89 | - | 69.42 |
| Experian¶ | 3045.00 | 78.00 | 3987.00 | 2203.00 | 1.70 | 25.14 | 4407.33 |
| Haydi | 73.10 | -1.80 | 78.45 | 28.68 | 0.60 | -20.08 | 7433.81 |
| Howden Joinery | 804.50 | -15.50 | 981.00 | 713.00 | 2.73 | 18.35 | 1260.82 |
| Hartford | 5945.00 | - | 6960.00 | 5019.00 | 2.82 | 26.80 | 622.17 |
| Johnson Service | 147.50 | 1.30 | 172.10 | 123.80 | 3.25 | 15.86 | 382.90 |
| MITIE Group¶ | 208.00 | - | 214.00 | 134.80 | 2.15 | 31.67 | 5862.31 |
| RS Group | 751.50 | -2.50 | 760.50 | 536.90 | 3.05 | 21.72 | 823.45 |
| Vp | 494.00 | 4.00 | 620.00 | 420.00 | 8.00 | -35.80 | 10.22 |
FINANCIAL TIMES
| Tech - Software & Services | |||||||
| Computacenter | 5625.00 | 410.00 | 5625.00 | 2234.00 | 1.33 | 38.40 | 587.85 |
| NCC Group | 144.20 | 2.60 | 161.60 | 107.20 | 3.22 | 25.75 | 715.69 |
| The Sage Grp | 1103.50 | 40.50 | 1181.00 | 771.66 | 2.03 | 29.24 | 2100.62 |
| Triad Group● | 410.00 | - | 430.00 | 236.00 | 2.20 | 41.33 | 2.52 |
| Price +/- Dly Chg | 52 Week | Yld | P/E | Vol 000s | |||
| High | Low | ||||||
| Media | |||||||
| Mission Group | 21.00 | - | 27.00 | 12.00 | - | -0.99 | 0.16 |
| Mining | |||||||
| Central Asia Metals | 174.40 | -7.40 | 244.00 | 125.27 | 8.89 | -5.57 | 3773.87 |
| Crixm Therapeutics | 11.50 | - | 18.50 | 8.00 | - | -2.25 | 123.22 |
| Oil & Gas | |||||||
| BorStlnPet | 12.40 | 0.80 | 14.00 | 7.60 | - | -105.26 | 2446.66 |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotech | |||||||
| Sareum Holdings | 35.00 | -2.00 | 40.00 | 9.50 | - | -14.58 | 720.88 |
| Retailers | |||||||
| Boohoo Group | 21.65 | 0.75 | 29.50 | 10.30 | - | -2.80 | 4853.34 |
| CVS Group | 1298.00 | -1.00 | 1648.00 | 1062.00 | 0.65 | 17.61 | 62.59 |
| Price | -/-Chg | 52 Week | Yld | Nk | |||
| Hi/Lo | Year | % | |||||
| Polar Tech. | 653.50 | 10.50 | 743.50 | 385.82 | ... | 700.54 | -8.05 |
| Right & Ins IT | 2460.00 | -10.00 | 2520.00 | 1955.13 | 1.84 | 2908.19 | -16.71 |
| RIT Cap. | 2565.00 | ... | 2645.00 | 1932.00 | 1.75 | 3106.00 | -17.10 |
| Ruffer Inv Jr. | 298.50 | 1.00 | 318.00 | 281.26 | 2.08 | 312.76 | -3.78 |
| Schid AsiaPlc | 644.00 | 8.00 | 892.00 | 608.00 | 1.54 | 927.83 | -10.19 |
| Schid Asia/Total | 750.00 | -1.00 | 738.00 | 548.70 | 1.63 | 732.18 | -32.14 |
| Schroder Inc | 378.00 | -3.00 | 378.00 | 311.90 | 3.91 | 398.75 | -5.33 |
| Schdr. Japan | 386.00 | 1.00 | 401.00 | 276.00 | 3.14 | 415.23 | -7.27 |
| Schdr Orient. | 458.00 | 0.50 | 463.00 | 303.00 | 2.88 | 468.19 | -3.41 |
| Schdr UK Mid | 784.00 | 14.00 | 790.00 | 652.00 | 2.86 | 824.80 | -5.88 |
| Schw or American | 565.00 | 2.00 | 572.00 | 439.10 | 2.91 | 642.00 | -6.00 |
| Scot Mortgage | 1478.50 | 11.50 | 1563.00 | 1015.74 | 0.31 | 1602.69 | -8.12 |
| Scot Oriental | 275.50 | -2.50 | 305.00 | 240.00 | 1.23 | 302.62 | -9.24 |
| Strategic Eq. | 355.00 | -4.00 | 415.00 | 330.00 | 1.20 | 390.94 | -8.35 |
| Sprintable Bar | 411.50 | -11.50 | 429.50 | 344.00 | 3.72 | 418.29 | 1.18 |
| Tetragon | 1917.60 | 11.50 | 1446.64 | 892.96 | 3.47 | ||
| TRIG | 76.40 | -0.20 | 80.50 | 63.20 | 9.88 | 100.48 | -23.74 |
| UIL | 197.00 | ... | 204.00 | 188.00 | 4.06 | 273.57 | -22.25 |
| Ultimo EmeMits | 279.00 | 1.00 | 302.00 | 243.00 | 3.47 | 309.57 | -10.48 |
| Unilever | 738.00 | -1.00 | 885.00 | 630.00 | ... | 127.12 | -1.22 |
| Worldwide Hlth | 393.00 | -1.50 | 401.50 | 320.00 | 6.01 | 423.76 | -7.12 |
| Telecommunications | |||||||
| Airtel Africa | 340.00 | 0.40 | 436.20 | 212.08 | 1.54 | 24.83 | 2502.77 |
| BT Group* | 206.20 | 1.20 | 242.09 | 173.00 | 4.03 | 18.75 | 9336.07 |
| Telecom Plus* | 863.00 | 3.00 | 1914.00 | 638.00 | 5.79 | 8.53 | 317.65 |
| Vodafone | 117.10 | -0.80 | 131.10 | 83.40 | 3.39 | -82.77 | 47994.52 |
| Tobacco | |||||||
| AEW UK REIT | 105.00 | -1.40 | 113.20 | 95.90 | 7.62 | 105.95 | -0.64 |
| TR Prop | 306.50 | -0.50 | 364.50 | 291.00 | 5.25 | 341.51 | -9.32 |
| VCTs | |||||||
| Bmd 2nd VT | 44.40 | -0.20 | 54.00 | 39.50 | 9.01 | 46.70 | -4.50 |
| Nthn 2 VCT | 53.00 | — | 56.50 | 47.00 | 5.66 | 55.40 | -4.33 |
| Nthn 3 VCT | 82.00 | — | 86.50 | 79.50 | 5.49 | 86.00 | -4.65 |
| Nthn Venture | 56.00 | — | 59.50 | 53.00 | 5.54 | 58.60 | -4.44 |
| Zero Dividend Preference Shares | |||||||
| Brit Amer Tobacco | 4152.00 | -86.00 | 5326.00 | 3677.00 | 5.90 | 11.83 | 2382.94 |
| Imperial Brands+ | 2523.00 | -36.00 | 3632.04 | 2476.00 | 6.61 | 10.05 | 1599.74 |
| Travel & Leisure | |||||||
| easyJet | 674.60 | 1.40 | 683.80 | 332.60 | 1.96 | 10.25 | 2017.11 |
| FirstGroup | 178.00 | -1.60 | 227.80 | 152.10 | 4.04 | 8.32 | 1409.55 |
| Fullers 'A' | 754.00 | - | 776.00 | 550.00 | 2.81 | 19.22 | 8.09 |
| IntConti Hotels+ | 11993.40 | -75.63 | 13305.06 | 8618.00 | 1.17 | 33.18 | 520.39 |
| Intl Cons Air | 436.90 | -5.30 | 492.90 | 332.70 | 1.56 | 7.15 | 4397.60 |
| Whitbread | 2472.00 | -21.00 | 3302.00 | 2098.00 | 3.92 | 20.05 | 405.12 |
| Consolidated - Private equity | |||||||
| CT PrivEq | 485.00 | 5.00 | 592.00 | 439.84 | 5.82 | 697.28 | -30.43 |
| HGCapital | 431.00 | 6.00 | 512.00 | 318.64 | 1.16 | 530.08 | -19.82 |
| HVPE | 3415.00 | 65.00 | 3500.00 | 2745.00 | — | 4390.00 | -25.70 |
| ICG Ent | 1486.00 | 6.00 | 1611.42 | 1288.31 | 2.83 | 2027.45 | -27.69 |
| Pantheon Int | 393.00 | — | 409.00 | 325.00 | — | 521.30 | -24.96 |
| Partners PE € | 658.49 | 20.88 | 945.52 | 583.57 | 9.11 | 11.57 | -36.04 |
| Aberforth GV | 117.50 | — | 120.18 | 109.50 | — | 115.71 | 1.57 |
| Investment Companies - AIM | |||||||
| Crys Amber | 82.50 | — | 155.39 | 80.66 | — | 175.59 | -52.73 |
| Drax Group | 767.00 | 10.50 | 937.50 | 613.90 | 3.95 | 37.05 | 845.99 |
| National Grid■ | 1160.00 | -22.50 | 1428.50 | 1000.00 | 4.18 | 17.71 | 8656.90 |
| Pennon● | 474.40 | -0.60 | 606.00 | 439.40 | 6.17 | 24.45 | 1217.73 |
| Severn Trent | 3100.00 | -50.00 | 3335.00 | 2381.00 | 4.07 | 25.10 | 369.66 |
| SSE● | 2381.00 | -35.00 | 2767.50 | 1597.00 | 2.89 | 22.57 | 1491.74 |
| Price | +/- Dly Chg | 52 Week | Yld | P/E | Vol000s | ||
| High | Low | ||||||
| Support Services | |||||||
| Christie | 152.50 | - | 165.00 | 90.00 | 2.30 | 30.02 | 16.87 |
| LonSec | 3650.00 | - | 3800.00 | 2100.00 | 2.66 | 18.81 | 0.15 |
| NWF | 153.00 | -0.50 | 187.50 | 110.00 | 5.69 | 8.23 | 112.77 |
| Petards | 10.00 | - | 12.50 | 7.00 | - | -14.93 | 9.80 |
| Renew | 962.00 | 1.00 | 979.00 | 772.00 | 2.11 | 15.60 | 82.80 |
| Tech - Software & Services | |||||||
| Oxford Metrics | 40.40 | 1.00 | 60.40 | 37.50 | 8.04 | -73.45 | 315.93 |
| Travel & Leisure | |||||||
| Gaming Realms | 30.00 | -0.10 | 52.00 | 29.00 | - | 14.78 | 413.30 |
| Jet2 | 1528.00 | -25.00 | 1676.00 | 980.00 | 1.11 | 7.23 | 286.83 |
All data is as of close of the previous business day. Company classifications are based on the ICB system used by FTSE. FSTE 100 constituents are shown in bold. Closing prices are shown in pence unless otherwise indicated. Highs & lows are based on intra-day trading over a rolling 52 week period. Price/earnings ratios (P/E) are based on latest annual reports and accounts and are updated with interim figures. P/E is calculated using the company's diluted earnings per share. The closing price is based on closing price and on dividends paid in the last financial year and updated with interim figures. Yields are shown in net terms; dividends on UK companies are net of 10% tax, non-UK companies are gross of tax. Highs & lows, yields and PER are adjusted to reflect capital changes where appropriate. Trading volumes are end of day aggregated totals, rounded to the nearest 1,000 shares. Net asset value per share (NAV) is based on the closing price and closing price at 30 days. The closing price is based on the latest cum fair net asset value estimate and closing price. Discounts, premiums, gross redemption yield (GRY) and hurdle rate for share (SP) to share (SP) and HR to wipe out (WO) are displayed as a percentage, NAV in pence.
- trading ex-dividend - trading ex-capital distribution
The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information.
The FT Share Service is a paid-for print listing service and may not be fully representative of all LSE-listed companies. This service is available to all listed companies, subject to the Editors discretion. For new sales enquiries please email data@ft.com. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com
Data provided by

Markets and data happen here.
www.ice.com

CP Capital Asset Management Limited
Artemis Fund Managers Ltd (1200)F
57 St James's Street, London SW1A 1LD 0800 092 2051

The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line. According to Rule 2 (UNDERSCORE & LINE RULES), stylistic or background lines (like this one) must be ignored by the OCR result. The provided OCR content is "____", which consists of four underscores. This is incorrect because underscores are not equivalent to a solid line and are not permitted under the “Stylistic/Background Lines (Ignore)” rule. The OCR has hallucinated underscores where none should exist in the GT. Therefore, the result is inconsistent with the Ground Truth.
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund

Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund

Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m
| Algebra Core Italy I EUR | € 252.17 | - | 0.91 | 0.00 | 25.36 | 17.46 |
| Algebra Core Italy R EUR | € 232.80 | - | 0.83 | 0.00 | 24.43 | 16.58 |
| Algebra Financial Credit I EUR | € 229.87 | - | -0.03 | 0.00 | 5.87 | 8.44 |
| Algebra Financial Credit I GBP | £ 203.63 | - | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Financial Credit I USD | $ 212.39 | - | -0.02 | 5.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Financial Credit II EUR | € 193.29 | - | -0.02 | 0.00 | 5.18 | 7.79 |
| Algebra Financial Equity B EUR | € 400.89 | - | 3.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Financial Equity RI EUR | € 324.86 | - | 2.47 | 0.00 | 27.05 | 27.76 |
| Algebra Financial Equity Fund B GBP | £ 335.03 | - | 2.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Financial Equity Fund RI USD | $ 505.22 | - | 3.88 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Financial Income I EUR | € 309.33 | - | 0.95 | 0.00 | 15.65 | 16.99 |
| Algebra Financial Income RI EUR | € 272.21 | - | 0.83 | 0.00 | 14.61 | 15.94 |
| Algebra Financial Income Fund I GBP | £ 227.22 | - | 0.69 | 6.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Financial Income Fund I USD | $ 259.57 | - | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Global Credit Opportunities I EUR | € 155.34 | - | 0.03 | 0.00 | 3.40 | 5.65 |
| Algebra Global Credit Opportunities RI EUR | € 148.99 | - | 0.03 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 5.13 |
| Algebra Global Credit Opportunities I GBP | € 154.54 | - | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Global Credit Opportunities I USD | $ 159.52 | - | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Algebra IG Financial Credit I EUR | € 120.56 | - | -0.09 | 0.00 | 4.12 | 6.59 |
| Algebra IG Financial Credit RI EUR | € 116.51 | - | -0.09 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 6.06 |
| Algebra Strategic Credit Fund RI EUR | € 116.19 | - | -0.05 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 0.00 |
| Algebra Global Equity Select B EUR | € 154.29 | - | 0.92 | 0.00 | 9.59 | 11.16 |
| Algebra Global Equity Select R EUR | € 146.78 | - | 0.87 | 0.00 | 8.19 | 9.73 |

| Ameris Capital Inc | |||||
| Artemis Corporate Bond I Acc | 118.89 | - | -0.23 | 0.00 | 5.35 |
| Artemis Global Income I Dis | 245.08 | - | 1.61 | 0.00 | 2.17 |
| Artemis High Income I Q Inc | 75.64 | - | -0.12 | 0.23 | 2.52 |
| Artemis Income I Inc | 359.05 | - | -1.20 | 5.48 | 12.25 |
| Artemis Monthly Dist I Inc | 103.06 | - | 0.30 | 0.00 | 14.27 |
| Artemis Short-Disc Strat Bond | 134.05 | - | -0.11 | 0.00 | 6.45 |
| Artemis SmartGARP Eur Eq I Acc | 1026.00 | - | -3.30 | 0.00 | 28.52 |
| Artemis SmartGARP Global Small Co I Acc | 257.87 | - | 0.97 | 1.95 | 14.91 |
| Artemis SmartGARP GlcEq Eq I Acc | 349.57 | - | 1.88 | 0.00 | 29.89 |
| Artemis SmartGARP Glc Eq I Acc | 808.28 | - | 7.15 | 0.00 | 29.35 |
| Artemis SmartGARP UK Eq I Acc | 4629.19 | - | -4.97 | 2.41 | 27.78 |
| Artemis Strategic Assets I Acc | 108.94 | - | 0.84 | 0.00 | 2.99 |
| Artemis Strategic Bond I Q Acc | 126.37 | - | -0.17 | 4.46 | 6.83 |
| Artemis UK Select Fund Class I Acc | 1510.20 | - | -5.01 | 0.00 | 10.71 |
| Artemis UK Smaller Cos I Acc | 2659.84 | - | 5.15 | 1.81 | 5.19 |
| Artemis UK Special Sits I Acc | 1263.59 | - | -5.33 | 0.00 | 14.57 |
| Artemis US Extended Alpha I Acc | 587.60 | - | 7.50 | 0.00 | 15.33 |
| Artemis US Select I Acc | 582.77 | - | 7.28 | 0.00 | 19.25 |
| Artemis US Snirr Cos I Acc | 533.57 | - | 8.24 | 0.00 | 16.57 |
| Gate Village 5, Level 4, Unit 11, DIFC,Dubai United Arab Emirateswww.asbc.com | ||||||
| ASB SUKUK - ACC | $ 104.15 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ASB SUKUK - DIST | $ 97.58 | - | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ASB State Street Global Equity | $ 125.21 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ASB Global Technology | $ 157.94 | - | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ASB MENA Equity | $ 100.08 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| American Dynamic | $ 9475.08 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| American One | $ 11210.70 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10.75 | 11.36 |
| Bond Global | € 1638.26 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 6.28 |
| Eurocroissance | € 1349.76 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Far East | $ 1278.40 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |

| Blue Whale Investment Funds ICAVwww.bluewhale.co.uk info@bluewhale.co.uk | ||||||
| FCA Recognised-Ireland UCITS | ||||||
| Blue Whale Growth USD T | $ | 24.59 | - | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |

| FCA Recognised | ||||||
| Global Leaders Fund USD C | $ 33.42 | - | -0.15 | 0.00 | 8.54 | 11.20 |
| Global Leaders Sustainable Fund USD C | $ 19.55 | - | -0.12 | 0.00 | 7.43 | 10.10 |
| Global Sustainable Total Return Bond GBP B | £ 9.48 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Global Sustainable Total Return Bond USD B | $ 10.92 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| US Equity Growth Fund USD B | $ 77.73 | - | 0.24 | 0.00 | 8.05 | 10.62 |
| US Flexible Equity Fund USD B | $ 42.87 | - | -0.04 | 0.00 | 11.45 | 15.39 |
| US Mid Cap Growth Fund USD C | $ 25.46 | - | 0.12 | 0.00 | 9.49 | 9.70 |
| US Small Cap Blend Fund USD B | $ 31.95 | - | 0.16 | 0.00 | 9.90 | 11.10 |
| US Smaller Companies Fund USD B | $ 47.96 | - | 0.34 | 0.00 | 8.95 | 7.74 |
| US Sustainable Growth Fund USD C | $ 40.87 | - | -0.05 | 0.00 | 8.04 | 12.03 |
| US Sustainable Value Fund USD C Acc | $ 18.38 | - | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Canaccord Wealth International Multi Strategy Funds Limited | |||||||
| Balanced Strategy | £ | 1.18 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.90 | 11.38 |
| Balanced Strategy A | £ | 1.18 | - | 0.00 | 1.84 | 8.66 | 8.81 |
| Cautious Balanced Strategy | £ | 1.48 | - | 0.00 | 0.91 | 9.45 | 9.29 |
| Cautious Balanced Strategy A | £ | 1.06 | - | 0.00 | 1.84 | 6.97 | 7.37 |
| Growth Strategy | £ | 2.67 | - | 0.01 | 0.76 | 1.16 | 5.50 |
| Growth Strategy A | £ | 1.28 | - | 0.00 | 0.54 | 10.46 | 11.01 |
| High Growth Strategy GBP | £ | 3.93 | - | 0.01 | 0.24 | 14.76 | 14.89 |
| High Growth Strategy A | £ | 1.34 | - | 0.00 | 0.52 | 12.36 | 12.28 |
| High Income Bond Fund B Monthly | £ | 0.99 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| High Income Bond Fund B Quarterly | £ | 1.00 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| USS Growth Strategy | $ | 2.60 | - | 0.00 | 0.21 | 15.87 | 15.72 |
Dealing Daily. Initial Charge Nil for A classes and up to 2% for other classes.
| Candriam Investors Group | (LUX) | |||||
| FCA Recognised | ||||||
| Candriam Alts Ret Eqt Mkt Neutral-C Cap | € | 227.07 | - | -0.44 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
| Candriam Bbls Euro High Yield Cap | € | 1454.34 | - | -0.24 | 0.00 | 4.22 |
| Candriam Bonds Glbl Hi Yield - C Cap | € | 291.25 | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 3.85 |
| Candriam Bonds Glbl Infl Dlt Don-I Cap | € | 166.87 | - | -0.11 | 0.00 | 2.67 |
| Candriam Bonds Total Return-C Cap | € | 144.07 | - | -0.21 | 0.00 | 2.18 |
| Candriam Diversified Futures-I Cap | € | 13717.49 | - | 10.72 | 0.00 | -0.39 |
| Candriam Eqx L, Australia CA AS | A$ | 2464.72 | - | -23.22 | 0.00 | 5.34 |
| Candriam Eqx L Emerging Mkts Cap | € | 1536.52 | - | 5.47 | 0.00 | 25.84 |
| Candriam Equities L Biotech-C Cap | € | 1484.45 | - | -5.53 | 0.00 | 20.58 |
| Candriam Equities L Europe Innov-R Cap | € | 262.85 | - | -0.71 | 0.00 | -4.65 |
| Candriam Index Alphastring - C Cap | € | 1532.81 | - | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Candriam Long Short Credit-R Cap | € | 120.54 | - | 0.01 | 0.00 | 3.05 |
| Candriam Risk Alphastring-C Cap | € | 2758.46 | - | -0.62 | 0.00 | 3.15 |
| Candriam Sust Bond Emerg Mkts I Dist | € | 778.31 | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 5.37 |
| Candriam Sust Bond Euro Corp R Cap | € | 111.79 | - | -0.06 | 0.00 | 2.86 |
| Candriam Sust GlblHighYield-I Cap | € | 1267.70 | - | 0.27 | 0.00 | 3.36 |
| Candriam Eq Girl Econ-R Cap | € | 164.73 | - | 0.60 | 0.00 | 5.51 |
| Candriam Eq Clmt Action I Cap | € | 2168.14 | - | 11.37 | 0.00 | 12.60 |
| Candriam Sust Eq Emerging Mkts C-Cap | € | 188.30 | - | 0.84 | 0.00 | 23.81 |
| Candriam Sust Eq EMU-C Cap | € | 224.35 | - | 0.39 | 0.00 | 7.64 |
| Candriam Sust Corp SBM Caps-I Cap | € | 2505.49 | - | 0.82 | 0.00 | -0.65 |
| Candriam Sust Eq World Core-I Cap | € | 46.49 | - | 0.05 | 0.00 | 11.57 |
| NYUM GF US High YieldCorp Bond-R Cap | € | 174.86 | - | 0.02 | 0.00 | 5.78 |
| Other International Funds | ||||||
| Candiram Bds Euro Sh. Term Cap | € 2194.12 | - | -0.34 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.99 |
| Candiram Bonds Credit Opportunities | € 222.09 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 3.42 |
| Candiram Bonds Emerg Mkt-C-Cap | $ 3121.29 | - | -0.93 | 0.00 | 7.15 | 9.23 |
| Candiram Equities L Eurp Opt Dlt 3-Cap | € 259.85 | - | -0.19 | 0.00 | 7.51 | 5.53 |
| Candiram Equities L Global Demg R Cap | € 388.77 | - | 0.55 | 0.00 | 9.71 | 12.53 |
| Candiram Equities Onco impt-I-Cap | $ 3762.28 | - | -35.17 | 0.00 | 7.62 | 9.69 |
| Candiram Equities L Robt&InnTech I Cap | $ 7721.14 | - | 6.77 | 0.00 | 28.48 | 24.52 |
| CG Portfolio Fund PLC | |||||||
| Absolute Return M Inc | £ | 144.63 | - | 0.07 | 2.61 | 3.13 | 2.55 |
| Capital Gearing Portfolio GBP P | £ | 39574.91 | - | 26.77 | 1.95 | 3.03 | 2.39 |
| Capital Gearing Portfolio GBP V | £ | 192.51 | - | 0.13 | 1.94 | 3.04 | 2.40 |
| Dollar Fund Cis D Inc | £ | 152.08 | - | 0.35 | 2.82 | -1.43 | -2.51 |
| Dollar Hedged GBP Inc | £ | 94.65 | - | -0.09 | 2.54 | 0.98 | 0.04 |
| Real Return Cis A Inc | £ | 183.05 | - | 0.33 | 2.55 | -0.73 | -2.28 |
| UK Index-Linked Bond G Inc | £ | 105.03 | - | 0.00 | 2.10 | 0.77 | 0.00 |
| FCA Recognised | ||||||
| 141.20 | - | 0.34 | 1.80 | 10.11 | 9.43 | |
| VT Cantab Balanced A GBP Acc | 139.43 | - | 0.25 | 2.12 | 9.56 | 8.37 |
| VT Cantab Moderate A GBP Acc | 173.27 | - | -0.28 | 1.37 | 10.22 | 10.05 |
| Other International Funds | ||||||
| CAM-GTF VCC | $ 459918.30 | 459818.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.49 | 3.79 |
| CAM Gri VCC | $ 1440.68 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 20.88 | 4.69 |
| RAIC VCC | $ 1.89 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8.97 | -1.66 |
Chartered Asset Management Pte Ltd
| www.cpglobal.com.sg, Email: customer_support@cpglobal.com.sg | ||||||
| International Mutual Funds | ||||||
| CP Multi-Strategy Fund | $ 465.42 | - | 0.23 | 0.00 | 12.21 | 13.48 |
| International Mutual Funds | ||||||
| CP Dual-Purpose Fund | $ 213.06 | - | -0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| CP Global Alpha Fund | $ 507.35 | - | -0.15 | 0.00 | 11.38 | 12.78 |
| CPS-Master Private Fund | $ 613.16 | - | -0.02 | 0.00 | 11.17 | 12.62 |
| Emerging Markets Stock Fund A USD Acc | $ | 16.39 | - | 0.08 | 0.00 | 28.07 | 25.21 |
| Emerging Markets Stock Fund A GBP Acc | £ | 17.05 | - | 0.15 | 0.00 | 24.39 | 21.75 |
| Emerging Markets Stock Fund D GBP Dis | £ | 15.43 | - | 0.14 | 1.69 | 21.87 | 19.25 |
| Emerging Markets Stock Fund A EUR Acc | € | 17.09 | - | 0.12 | 1.51 | 23.94 | 22.09 |
| EUR Accumulating Class | € | 18.21 | - | 0.01 | 0.00 | 3.04 | 3.93 |
| EUR Accumulating Class (H) | € | 12.25 | - | -0.02 | 0.00 | 4.42 | 4.60 |
| EUR Distributing Class | € | 11.23 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | -1.59 | -0.73 |
| EUR Distributing Class (H) | € | 7.50 | - | -0.01 | 5.05 | -0.30 | -0.08 |
| GBP Distributing Class | £ | 11.80 | - | 0.03 | 4.75 | -1.26 | -1.07 |
| GBP Distributing Class (H) | £ | 8.49 | - | -0.01 | 4.70 | 1.56 | 1.46 |
| USD Accumulating Class | $ | 15.31 | - | -0.03 | 0.00 | 6.45 | 6.61 |
| CHF Distributing Class (H) | Str | 7.65 | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | -2.68 | -2.59 |
| Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-Global Stock Funds | |||||||
| USD Accumulating Share Class | $ | 50.43 | - | 0.01 | 0.00 | 16.54 | 18.09 |
| GBP Accumulating Share Class | £ | 61.02 | - | 0.27 | 0.00 | 13.18 | 14.80 |
| GBP Distributing Share Class | £ | 39.20 | - | 0.18 | 0.00 | 10.61 | 13.26 |
| EUR Accumulating Share Class | € | 64.99 | - | 0.14 | 0.00 | 12.74 | 12.86 |
| GBP Distributing Share Class (H) | £ | 21.71 | - | 0.01 | 0.00 | 14.45 | 15.71 |
| USD Distributing Class | $ | 20.62 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.93 | 16.44 |
| CAD Accumulating Class | C$ | 66.04 | - | 0.24 | 0.00 | 17.28 | 18.83 |
| USD Accumulating Share Class | $ | 61.76 | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 14.36 | 16.68 |
| GBP Accumulating Share Class | £ | 70.67 | - | 0.30 | 0.00 | 11.06 | 13.43 |
| GBP Distributing Share Class | £ | 41.17 | - | 0.17 | 0.00 | 10.22 | 12.53 |
| EUR Accumulating Share Class | € | 68.72 | - | 0.13 | 0.00 | 7.74 | 11.37 |
| GBP Distributing Share Class (H) | £ | 23.34 | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 12.95 | 15.19 |
| USD Distributing Class | $ | 22.62 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 13.49 | 15.73 |
DRAGON CAPITAL
| Dragon Capitalwww.dragoncapital.comFund Information:info@dragoncapital.com | ||||||
| Other International Funds | ||||||
| Vietnam Equity (UCITS Fund A USD) | $ | 36.53 | - | 0.15 | 0.00 | 7.05 0.00 |

| Sunderland SR43 4AU (0800) S58 3010 | ||||||
| Authorised Inv Funds | ||||||
| EdenTree Global Impact Bond | 87.05 | - | -0.14 | 4.18 | -0.35 | 0.60 |
| EdenTree Green Impact Equity | 135.80 | - | 0.80 | 0.93 | 8.93 | 9.98 |
| EdenTree Green Impact Infrastructure | 78.76 | - | -0.11 | 6.64 | -2.53 | -6.23 |
| EdenTree Global Sustainable Government Bond | 97.16 | - | -0.12 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| EdenTree Sustainable European Equity A | 495.60 | - | -2.80 | 1.84 | 13.40 | 14.42 |
| EdenTree Sustainable European Equity B | 500.90 | - | -2.90 | 0.00 | 13.36 | 14.39 |
| EdenTree Sustainable Global Equity A | 458.90 | - | 1.00 | 0.53 | 9.97 | 9.79 |
| EdenTree Sustainable Global Equity B | 463.00 | - | 1.00 | 0.95 | 9.92 | 9.76 |
| EdenTree Sustainable Managed Income A | 141.10 | - | -0.90 | 4.02 | 5.78 | 4.91 |
| EdenTree Sustainable Managed Income B | 153.00 | - | -1.00 | 3.99 | 6.27 | 5.33 |
| EdenTree Sustainable Short Dated Bond | 95.93 | - | -0.06 | 4.58 | 0.46 | 1.15 |
| EdenTree Sustainable Sterling Bond A | 85.13 | - | -0.11 | 4.99 | -0.35 | 0.77 |
| EdenTree Sustainable Sterling Bond B | 98.26 | - | -0.13 | 4.99 | 0.25 | 1.38 |
| EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity A | 254.00 | - | -0.70 | 1.77 | 6.09 | 4.59 |
| EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity B | 253.20 | - | -0.80 | 2.14 | 4.10 | 4.53 |
| EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity Opp A | 329.60 | - | -1.70 | 1.47 | 3.43 | 6.20 |
| EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity Opp B | 336.40 | - | -1.80 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 6.15 |

| Broker Dealings: GB 414 181 | ||||||
| GEIC Funds | ||||||
| Alloster World Fund W-Acc-GBP | £ | 4.35 | - | 0.02 | 0.98 | 16.44 16.37 |
| American Fund W-Acc-GBP | £ | 86.25 | - | 1.10 | 0.00 | 9.21 12.28 |
| American Special Sits W-Acc-GBP | £ | 29.65 | - | 0.17 | 0.41 | 4.29 8.18 |
| Asia Funds W-Acc-GBP | £ | 29.46 | - | 0.32 | 0.50 | 31.74 21.72 |
| Asia Pacific Opps W-Acc | £ | 3.49 | - | 0.00 | 0.66 | 9.15 5.51 |
| Asian Dividend Fund W-Acc-GBP | £ | 3.71 | - | 0.02 | 2.01 | 21.86 16.44 |
| Cash Fund W-Acc-GBP | £ | 1.21 | - | 0.00 | 3.83 | 0.00 0.00 |
| China Fund W-Accumulation-GBP | £ | 2.53 | - | 0.00 | 1.48 | 13.18 -0.18 |
| Emerging Mkts NAV | 1597.16 | - | 17.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 0.00 | |
| Enhanced Income Fund W-In-CBP | £ | 0.95 | - | -0.01 | 6.08 | -1.45 -1.96 |
| European Fund W-Acc-GBP | £ | 32.58 | - | 0.07 | 1.43 | 5.71 7.59 |
| Global High Income Bond W-Acc-GBP | £ | 1.58 | - | 0.00 | 5.72 | 5.37 7.24 |
| Sustainable Euro Equity Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 7.40 | - | -0.01 | 1.13 | 7.81 7.92 |
| Sustainable Global Equity Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 43.78 | - | 0.41 | 0.30 | 6.26 6.96 |
| Japan Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 10.49 | - | 0.05 | 0.91 | 20.82 18.97 |
| Select 50 Balanced Fund P+Acc-GBP | £ | 1.55 | - | 0.00 | 2.14 | 0.00 0.00 |
| Special Situations Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 74.20 | - | -0.32 | 2.24 | 17.55 18.92 |
| Short Dated Corp Bond Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 12.68 | - | -0.01 | 4.65 | 0.00 0.00 |
| Sustainable Water & Waste W-ACC-GBP | £ | 126.60 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7.94 1.31 |
| Sustainable Water & Waste W-InC-GBP | £ | 124.00 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 0.00 |
| UK Select Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 4.79 | - | -0.01 | 1.68 | 5.00 8.13 |
| Global Dividend Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 4.63 | - | -0.01 | 2.47 | 13.94 14.90 |
| Global Enhanced W-ACC-GBP | £ | 3.60 | - | -0.01 | 4.13 | 13.68 14.31 |
| Global Special Sits W-ACC-GBP | £ | 92.06 | - | 0.63 | 0.20 | 16.93 16.15 |
| Index Emerging Markets P-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.85 | - | 0.02 | 1.60 | 23.61 17.40 |
| Index Europe ex UK Markets P-ACC-GBP | £ | 3.03 | - | -0.01 | 2.05 | 15.24 13.72 |
| Index Japan P-ACC-GBP | £ | 3.21 | - | 0.01 | 1.50 | 17.06 16.23 |
| Index Pacific ex Japan P-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.66 | - | -0.01 | 2.60 | 15.67 11.79 |
| Index Sterling Corp Bond Fund P-ACC-GBP | £ | 0.96 | - | 0.00 | 5.13 | 0.00 0.00 |
| Index UK P-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.53 | - | -0.01 | 2.63 | 16.77 15.76 |
| Index US P-ACC-GBP | £ | 6.16 | - | 0.05 | 0.86 | 14.64 16.99 |
| Index World P-ACC-GBP | £ | 4.66 | - | 0.03 | 1.15 | 15.35 16.39 |
| MoneyBuilder Balanced Fund W-Acc-GBP | £ | 0.79 | - | 0.00 | 2.90 | 0.00 0.00 |
| MoneyBuilder Dividend Fund W-Acc-GBP | £ | 1.66 | - | -0.01 | 3.57 | -0.89 -1.54 |
| Sust. MoneyBuilder Inc Fd Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 14.25 | - | -0.02 | 4.45 | 3.30 5.38 |
| Multi Asset Alloc Adventurous Fd W-ACC-GBP £ | £ | 3.22 | - | 0.01 | 1.13 | 13.87 13.70 |
| Multi Asset Alloc Defensive Fd W-ACC-GBP | £ | 1.58 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.49 6.01 |
| Multi Asset Alloc Growth Fd W-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.58 | - | 0.01 | 1.11 | 11.19 10.96 |
| Multi Asset Alloc Strategic Fd W-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.04 | - | 0.00 | 1.16 | 7.93 8.18 |
| Multi Asset Balanced Inc Fd W-InC-GBP | £ | 1.05 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.27 3.56 |
| Multi Asset Inc & Growth Fund W-InC-GBP | £ | 1.34 | - | 0.00 | 2.42 | 11.69 9.37 |
| Multi Asset Income Fund W-InC-GBP | £ | 0.92 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.20 2.25 |
| Multi Asset Open Advent W-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.52 | - | 0.00 | 1.66 | 13.06 11.99 |
| Multi Asset Open Defen W-ACC-GBP | £ | 1.68 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8.71 7.39 |
| Multi Asset Open GrowthFund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.35 | - | 0.00 | 1.79 | 12.49 11.43 |
| Multi Asset Open Staat Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 1.99 | - | 0.00 | 2.39 | 10.22 9.08 |
| Open World Fund W-Acc-GBP | £ | 3.46 | - | 0.01 | 0.82 | 13.68 13.36 |
| Strategic Bond Fund P-ACC-GBP | £ | 1.39 | - | 0.00 | 3.57 | 4.32 5.47 |
| Index UK Gilt Fund P-Acc-GBP | £ | 0.77 | - | 0.00 | 4.44 | 2.14 2.27 |
| Sustainable Asia Equity Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.81 | - | 0.02 | 0.75 | 23.86 13.98 |
| Sust Multi Asset Balanced Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 1.22 | - | 0.00 | 1.29 | 0.00 0.00 |
| Sust Multi Asset Con. Fd W-ACC-GBP | £ | 1.09 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 0.00 |
| Sust Multi Asset Growth Fd W-ACC-GBP | £ | 1.34 | - | 0.00 | 1.13 | 0.00 0.00 |
| UK Opportunities Fund W-ACC-GBP | £ | 2.75 | - | -0.01 | 2.13 | 0.00 0.00 |
| UK Smaller Companies W-ACC-GBP | £ | 4.92 | - | -0.02 | 2.29 | 4.90 9.37 |
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
Fundsmith LLP (1200)F PO Box 10846, Chelmsford Essex CM99 2BW 0330 123 1815 www.fundsmith.co.uk, enquiries@fundsmith.co.uk
| Authorised Inv Funds | ||||||
| Fundsmith Equity T Acc | 708.21 | - | 3.81 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 3.10 |
| Fundsmith Equity T Inc | 639.20 | - | 3.43 | 0.00 | 14.69 | 13.88 |
McInroy & Wood Portfolios Limited
Easter Alderston, Haddington EH41 3SF 01620 825867

| Guinness Global Investors | |||||||
| Guinness Global Equity Income Y GBP Dis | £ | 24.99 | - | 0.16 | 2.05 | 9.56 | 11.16 |
| Guinness Global Innovators Y GBP ACC | £ | 47.28 | - | 0.31 | 0.00 | 12.01 | 15.57 |
| Guinness Global Quality Mid Cap Y Gbp Acc | £ | 15.97 | - | 0.16 | 0.00 | 12.23 | 11.52 |
| International Insurances | ||||||
| Holiday Property Bond Ser 1 | £ | 0.49 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.41 |
| Holiday Property Bond Ser 2 | £ | 0.66 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Marwyn Asset Management Limited | (CYM) | ||||||
| Regulated | |||||||
| Marwyn Value Investors | £ | 362.11 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |

| Authorised Inv Funds | ||||||
| Balanced Fund Acc | 7026.60 | - | 9.20 | 1.74 | 5.04 | 0.00 |
| Balanced Fund Inc | 6634.30 | - | 8.60 | 1.77 | 3.33 | 3.14 |
| Emerging Markets Fund ACC | 2343.70 | - | 4.50 | 1.71 | 2.71 | 0.00 |
| Emerging Markets Fund Inc | 2111.80 | - | 4.00 | 1.74 | 0.95 | -1.53 |
| Income Fund Acc | 3643.70 | - | -5.30 | 2.68 | 7.25 | 0.00 |
| Income Fund Inc | 3230.20 | - | -4.70 | 2.76 | 4.13 | 3.86 |
| Smaller Companies Fund Acc | 7344.70 | - | 27.40 | 1.20 | 5.13 | 0.00 |
| Smaller Companies Fund Inc | 6904.80 | - | 25.70 | 1.22 | 3.87 | 4.16 |
| Ministry of Justice Common Investment Funds | (UK) | |||||
| Property & Other UK Unit Trusts | ||||||
| The Equity Idx Tracker Fd Inc | 2694.00 | - | -2.00 | 1.90 | 11.80 | 11.49 |
| Distribution Units | ||||||

| Nutshell Asset Management Ltd | (IRL) | ||||||
| Nutshell Asset Management Ltd, Ivybridge House, 1-5 Adam Street, London WC2N 6LEwww.nutshellam.com | |||||||
| Authorised Inv Funds | |||||||
| Nutshell Growth Fund Gbp Inst Founder | £ | 186.86 | - | 0.46 | 0.00 | 15.16 | 16.66 |
| Janus Henderson Absolute Return Fund A Acc | 207.50 | - | 0.30 | 2.10 | 5.56 | 6.56 |
| Janus Henderson Asian Div Inc Unit Trust Inc | 100.80 | - | -0.30 | 5.60 | 12.03 | 9.33 |
| Janus Henderson Cautious Mngf Fund A Acc | 356.60 | - | -0.00 | 3.80 | 6.84 | 8.33 |
| Janus Henderson Cautious Mngf Fund A Inc | 153.90 | - | -0.30 | 3.90 | 3.59 | 3.60 |
| Janus Henderson China Opp Fund A Acc | 1306.00 | - | 2.00 | 0.10 | 20.18 | 5.32 |
| Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Asia A Acc | 1878.00 | - | 10.00 | 0.00 | 23.61 | 17.20 |
| Janus Henderson Emerg. Mkts Opps Fnd A Acc | 306.60 | - | 1.60 | 0.00 | 20.73 | 15.78 |
| Janus Henderson European Focus A Acc | 614.50 | - | -0.50 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Janus Henderson Euro. Sel Opps Fund A Acc | 3255.00 | - | -6.00 | 0.20 | 10.75 | 10.65 |
| Janus Henderson Fixed Int Mthly Inc Fd Inc | 17.08 | - | -0.02 | 5.90 | 0.24 | -0.22 |
| Janus Henderson Global Equity Inc Fnd Inc | 88.50 | - | 0.08 | 2.30 | 10.40 | 9.37 |
| Janus Henderson Global Select Fund Acc | 6610.00 | - | 68.00 | 0.00 | 10.68 | 15.52 |
| Janus Henderson Global Sust Equity Fd A Inc | 718.70 | - | 2.40 | 0.00 | 9.95 | 12.85 |
| Janus Henderson Global Tech Ldrs Fnd A Acc | 6955.00 | - | 115.00 | 0.00 | 23.50 | 27.01 |
| Janus Henderson Inst UK Index Opps A Acc | 180.30 | - | -0.77 | 2.10 | 16.49 | 15.56 |
| Janus Henderson Multi-Aust Abs Bn Fd A Acc | 189.10 | - | -0.40 | 2.70 | 4.81 | 4.65 |
| Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Acti Fd A Acc | 337.20 | - | 0.00 | 1.80 | 8.66 | 9.00 |
| Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Dist Fd A Inc | 137.40 | - | 6.30 | 2.80 | 3.72 | 3.27 |
| Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Div Fd A Acc | 106.40 | - | 0.10 | 3.40 | 6.20 | 6.56 |
| Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Gbl Sel Fd A Acc | 442.10 | - | 3.40 | 0.00 | 9.59 | 11.05 |
| Janus Henderson MultiMgrIncGwth FdA Acc | 233.40 | - | 0.50 | 2.70 | 7.16 | 7.02 |
| Janus Henderson Multi-MgrInc&Gwth Fd A Inc | 162.00 | - | 0.40 | 2.80 | 3.90 | 3.61 |
| Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Mngf Fd A Acc | 406.10 | - | 0.00 | 1.50 | 8.15 | 8.46 |
| Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Mngf Fd A Inc | 374.60 | - | 0.00 | 1.20 | 6.76 | 6.97 |
| Janus Henderson Sterling Bond Unit Trust Acc | 229.70 | - | -0.40 | 4.30 | 2.69 | 4.59 |
| Janus Henderson Sterling Bond Unit Trust Inc | 55.48 | - | -0.10 | 4.30 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Janus Henderson Strategic Bond Fund A Inc | 95.62 | - | -0.10 | 5.70 | -0.99 | -1.79 |
| Janus Henderson UK Alpha Fund A Acc | 201.00 | - | 0.00 | 1.20 | 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Janus Henderson UK Eq Inc & Growth Fd A Inc | 706.50 | - | -3.60 | 3.30 | 9.90 | 11.64 |
| Janus Henderson US Growth Fund A Acc | 2981.00 | - | 19.00 | 0.00 | 11.01 | 14.98 |
Royal London 80 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 4BY
| Authorised Corporate Director-Waystone Management (UK) Limited | ||||||
| Global Total Fd PCG A | 709.43 | - | 2.93 | 0.41 | 15.36 | 18.65 |
| Global Total Fd PCG B | 698.53 | - | 2.88 | 0.00 | 15.29 | 18.59 |
| Global Total Fd PCG INT | 681.36 | - | 2.81 | 0.00 | 15.12 | 18.41 |
Purisima Investment Fds (UK) (1200)F 3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL Order Desk and Enquiries:0345 922 0044 Authorised Inv Funds
| Purisima Investment Fds (CI) Ltd | (JER) | |||||
| Regulated | ||||||
| PCG B | 577.18 | - | 0.26 | 0.00 | 17.21 | 21.10 |
| PCG C | 556.92 | - | 0.25 | 0.00 | 16.95 | 20.83 |
Additional Funds Available Please see www.royallondon.com for details

| Authorised Inv Funds | ||||||
| Royal London Sustainable Diversified A Inc | 285.70 | - | 0.50 | 1.54 | 4.64 | 6.19 |
| Royal London Sustainable World A Inc | 507.80 | - | 2.30 | 0.76 | 11.02 | 11.89 |
| Royal London Corporate Bond Mth Income | 76.96 | - | -0.15 | 4.44 | 0.39 | 1.34 |
| Royal London European Growth Trust | 298.20 | - | -0.30 | 1.14 | 11.66 | 11.43 |
| Royal London Sustainable Leaders A Inc | 1029.00 | - | -1.00 | 1.47 | 8.79 | 8.12 |
| Royal London UK Growth Trust | 880.00 | - | -2.60 | 1.69 | 11.85 | 11.39 |
| Royal London UK Income With Growth Trust | 259.40 | - | -0.60 | 3.83 | 8.27 | 8.36 |
| Royal London US Growth Trust | 657.10 | - | 4.90 | 0.01 | 14.43 | 17.49 |
| Regulated | ||||||
| Oasis Crescent Global Eq Fd (USD) A (Dist) | $ | 58.25 | - | -0.24 | 0.00 | 20.99 |
| Oasis Crescent Global Inc Fd (USD) A (Dist) | $ | 10.27 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Oasis Crescent Low Equity Fund (USD) D (Dist) | $ | 16.59 | - | -0.05 | 0.00 | 11.83 |
| Oasis Crescent Med Equity Fd (USD) A (Dist) | $ | 19.50 | - | -0.08 | 0.00 | 14.22 |
| Oasis Crescent Prop Equity Fd (USD) A (Dist) | $ | 11.18 | - | -0.05 | 0.00 | 11.99 |
| Oasis Crescent Short Term Inc Fd (USD) A (Dist) | $ | 0.96 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Oasis Crescent Variable Fund (USD) A (Dist) | £ | 12.45 | - | -0.02 | 0.00 | 8.64 |
| Private Fund Mgrs (Guernsey) Ltd | (GSY) | ||||||
| Regulated | |||||||
| Monument Growth 11/08/2026 | £ | 612.89 | 638.71 | 0.00 | 1.36 | 3.26 | 3.09 |

Ruffer LLP (1000) F 3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL Order Desk and Enquiries: 0345 601 9610 Authorised Inv Funds
| WS Ruffer Total Return C Acc | 601.96 | - | 0.00 | 1.78 | 4.40 | 3.53 |
| WS Ruffer Total Return C Inc | 351.79 | - | 0.00 | 1.80 | 3.60 | 1.78 |

| SICO BSC BHRTelephone - +973 1751 5700Website - www.sicobank.com | ||||||
| (BHR) | ||||||
| Khaleej Equity Fund | $ | 583.47 | - | -3.93 | 0.00 | -3.81 |
| Sico Gulf Equity Fund | $ | 198.62 | - | 0.17 | 0.00 | 10.57 |
| SICO Capital KSATelephone - +966 11 521 3835Website - www.sicocapital.com | (KSA) | ||||||
| SICO Kingdom Equity Fund | SAR | 10.66 | - | -0.27 | 0.00 | 1.39 | - |
| SICO MENA Equity Fund | SAR | 21.34 | - | 0.13 | 0.00 | -1.37 | 4.80 |
| SICO Capital Money Market | SAR | 13.92 | - | -0.03 | 0.00 | - | - |
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m

| Stonehage Fleming Investment Management Ltd | (IRL) |
| www.stonehagefleming.com/gbi enquiries@stonehagefleming.com |
| SF Global Best Ideas Eq B USD Acc | $ | 308.65 | - | 0.20 | 0.00 | 5.90 | 7.54 |
| SF Global Best Ideas Eq D GBP Inc | £ | 344.60 | - | 1.36 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 4.57 |

| Superfund Trend Gold | $ 2002.60 | - | -17.06 | 0.00 | 37.30 | 31.15 |
| Superfund Trend Silver | $ 2176.40 | - | -19.77 | 0.00 | 56.21 | 39.39 |
| Superfund Trend | $ 803.79 | - | 0.33 | 0.00 | 10.38 | 5.77 |
| Superfund Bitcoin 0-2x | € 83.15 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | -2.33 | 10.17 |
| Superfund Fund-of-Funds | $ 157.85 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 18.23 | 17.41 |
| Superfund Blockchain | € | 23.98 | - | 0.34 | 0.00 | 14.80 | 31.71 |
| Superfund Gold Silver + Mining | € | 22.42 | - | 0.09 | 0.00 | 38.01 | - |
| Superfund Quadriga All Seasons | € | 15.25 | - | -0.13 | 0.00 | 17.35 | 16.89 |
| Superfund Inflation | SFr | 11.73 | - | -0.04 | 0.00 | 13.76 | 4.56 |

| Troy Asset Management (1200) | (UK) |
| 3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL | |
| Order Desk and enquiries 0345 608 0950 | |
| Authorised Inv Funds |
Authorised Corporate Director-Waystone Management (UK) Limited
| Trojan Investment Funds | |||||
| Trojan Ethical Global Inc O Acc | 114.91 | - | -0.46 | 2.95 | 1.08 |
| Trojan Ethical Global Inc O Inc | 101.20 | - | -0.40 | 3.01 | -0.82 |
| Trojan Ethical O Acc | 159.77 | - | 0.00 | 0.67 | 6.76 |
| Trojan Ethical O Inc | 154.24 | - | 0.00 | 0.67 | 6.66 |
| Trojan Ethical Income O Acc | 172.88 | - | -0.56 | 2.51 | 5.83 |
| Trojan Ethical Income O Inc | 130.08 | - | -0.43 | 2.60 | 3.03 |
| Trojan Fund Acc | 467.46 | - | -0.72 | 0.80 | 6.35 |
| Trojan Fund Inc | 366.28 | - | -0.57 | 0.88 | 7.54 |
| Trojan Global Income O Acc | 179.02 | - | -0.40 | 3.24 | 4.27 |
| Trojan Global Income O Inc | 132.90 | - | -0.30 | 3.31 | 1.02 |
| Trojan Income O Acc | 409.45 | - | -0.93 | 2.72 | 4.27 |
| Trojan Income O Inc | 180.40 | - | -0.41 | 2.81 | 1.73 |
| Trojan Funds (Ireland) Plc | ||||||
| Trojan Europe O EUR Acc | € | 1.0313 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Trojan Exclusions X GBP Acc | £ | 1.3364 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7.80 |
| Trojan Global Equity O GBP Acc | £ | 6.1573 | - | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.98 |
| Trojan (Ireland) O GBP Acc | £ | 1.8795 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7.05 |
The fund prices quoted on these pages are supplied by the fund regulators, fund managers and fund administrators. Details of funds published on these pages, including prices, are for the purpose of information only and should only be used as a guide. The Financial Times Limited makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness and they should not be relied upon when making an investment decision. The sale of interests in the funds listed on these pages may, in certain jurisdictions, be restricted by law and the funds will not necessarily be available to persons in all jurisdictions in which the publication circulates. Persons in any doubt should take appropriate professional advice. Data collated by ICE. The fund prices published in this edition along with additional information are also available on the Financial Times website, www.ft.com/funds. The funds published on these pages are subject to change in the value of the investment company. Prices are in person unless otherwise indicated. The change, if, is shown, is the change on the previously quoted figure (not all funds update prices daily). Those designated it with or on a prior to US dollars. Yield percentage figures (in Tuesday to Saturday) paper allow for buying expenses.
Prices of certain older insurance linked plans might be subject to capital gains tax on sales.
OEIC: Open-Ended Investment Company. Similar to a unit trust but using a company rather than a trust structure. Different share classes are issued to reflect a different currency, charging structure or type of holder. Bid price: Also called selling price. The price at which units in a unit trust are sold by investors. Offer price: Also called buying price. The price at which units in a unit trust are bought by investors. Includes manager's initial charge. Single price: Based on a mid-market valuation of the underlying investments. The buying and selling price for shares of an OECD and units of a single priced unit trust are the same. Treatment of manager's periodic capital charge: 24 and 36 months; 24 and 36 month annualized performance figures calculated using the total gain (or loss) from that period. Performance formula is adjusted to consider the income distribution during the reference period. Yield: Calculated using the funds' projected annual income, divided by the latest available net asset value.
Data provided by
The prices appearing in the newspaper are the most recent provided by the managers/operators. Charges for this advertising service are based on the number of lines published and the classification of the fund. Please contact data@ft.com for further information. For further queries contact newspapers@ice.com

Markets and data happen here.
www.ice.com
ice.com

Ice



A coastal ruin, a Reformation fortress, Mary Queen of Scots' prison and a Tweed-side tower make for atmospheric bathing trips. By Mure Dickie
Among the many pleasures of travelling in Scotland, few leave a more lasting impression than a striking view of one of the nation's venerable castles and delving into its rich history. And there is nothing like a swim in clear waters to make a day even more memorable.
Many of Scotland's finest castles are built on the scenic shores of its lochs, rivers or sea, locations that often made them much easier to defend. Some were built to guard strategic waterways or to provide secure bases for maritime power.
Almost all have grand tales to tell from their often tumultuous past. And while Scottish waters can be a little chilly, I have always found that taking a dip gives a visceral sense of entering the landscape and often a fresh perspective on even familiar scenes.
So-called wild swimming is increasingly popular in Scotland, where broad rights to roam* mean you are unlikely to be prevented from entering most bodies of water as long as you judge it safe and cause no damage or disturbance to wildlife. Here are four of the best such swims to try within easy reach of Edinburgh.
One of Scotland's most imposing medieval fortifications, Tantallon Castle stands atop a high promontory jutting out into the Firth of Forth about an hour's drive east of Edinburgh. It's now a very substantial ruin, and visitors can easily enter the castle from its landward side. But why not walk along the rocky coast to the castle's east and, if conditions permit, a short swim out into the Forth? This will give you an impressive perspective of the castle's natural and man-made defences.
The steep cliffs that guarded the castle on its seaward sides, together with the wide dry moat, grand gatehouse and thick sandstone wall that shielded it to the south, made Tantallon a bastion.
In 1528, a siege led by King James V against the rebellious Archibald Douglas, the 6th Earl of Angus, failed to take the fortress after its walls withstood a 20-day bombardment by royal cannon. Never before in Scotland's history, crowed Douglas later, had such “pane travell expensis and diligence” (pain, travel, expense and diligence) been expended unsuccessfully for the “wynnyng of ane house” (winning of a house).
Tantallon Castle near North Berwick, East Lothian, left; swimmers enjoying the waters of the River Tweed, above right; Lochleven Castle where Mary Queen of Scots was once imprisoned, below Michael Vince Kim/ Iain Masterton / Alamy Stock Photo
In standing his ground at Tantallon, Douglas was following the example of his 14th-century ancestor, Margaret, Countess of Angus and Mar. A widowed heiress to estates in Scotland's northeast, Margaret lived in the castle as the mistress of the first Earl of Douglas and mother of his son. But when the earl and his successor died, she was ordered to return Tantallon to its feudal superior, the Earl of Fife — son of the king and guardian of the kingdom.

Instead of meekly submitting, Margaret gathered local gentry and kinsmen at Tantallon, where they held out through the winter of 1388-89 until Fife cut a deal, promising to allow the countess to remain in the castle and to support her, her men and her lands "agayns ony that wald wrang thaim" (against any that would wrong them). The accommodation secured the positions of Margaret's supporters and cleared the way for her to establish her illegitimate son George as the first of a new line of earls of Angus. It also demonstrated the influence and authority that independent-minded aristocratic women could exercise in a male-dominated age.
Tantallon's walls were later humbled by the more modern artillery of Oliver Cromwell during the English dictator's conquest of Scotland in 1651, but the castle's ruins were to fire the imaginations of author Walter Scott and painter Alexander Nasmyth in the 19th century.
Nasmyth's view of the castle from the coast, complete with stormy seas and a shipwreck, is a masterpiece of Scottish Romantic painting. For a similar perspective and a wonderfully scenic swim
- though only in much calmer weather - take a bus or drive to Seacliff Beach. The nearest bus stop is at Auldhame Farm and there is paid parking at the beach. From Seacliff, walk westwards past the little old harbour carved in the rocks. Be careful not to pass any headland while the tide is rising to ensure you can easily return.
Another clifftop fortress, this time an hour and a half's drive north-east of Edinburgh, St Andrews Castle was for centuries the residence of influential Catholic clerics before becoming a battleground in the Protestant Reformation that wracked Scotland in the 16th century.
It was here in 1546 that Cardinal David Beaton presided over the show trial of evangelical preacher George Wishart, who after his conviction was strangled and burned at the stake outside the castle walls. Months later, the castle was seized by vengeful local lairds and evangelicals, who killed Beaton and hung his body from the walls. The fitful siege that followed drew the attention of England, which supported the Protestant rebels, and Catholic France, Scotland's traditional ally and the birthplace of its dowager queen, Mary of Guise, the mother of Mary Queen of Scots.
Provisions sent by sea to the besieged castle by England's Henry VIII helped the rebels hold out for more than a year, but France's intervention proved decisive. In July 1547, King Henry II of France secretly dispatched a small fleet to St Andrews under a brilliant Italian commander with detailed information of Scotland's coastal waters. A few hours of intense bombardment from the sea and land broke the walls of the castle and the will of its defenders. The assault was, in the words of historian Jane E A Dawson, a "masterclass in the swift reduction of a fortified position".

FT Globetrotter for coffee, cocktails, power dining, running, exercise classes, travelling green and much more.
For a sense of the sight that would have greeted the French fleet, take a bus or drive to St Andrews and walk to the Castle Sands, a beach below the fortress. There is a well-used though dilapidated tidal pool (swimmable when the tide is out), but confident swimmers can venture further out for a better view of the castle's seaward cliffs and walls.
This is a fine example of the strong verticality of form that makes Scottish tower houses such a distinctive and picturesque contribution to the landscape. More seriously fortified than many such towers, it was likely built in the late 14th or 15th century and stands on a precipitous slope above the River Tweed about an hour's drive south of Edinburgh. Viewed from the water, it has an impressive monumentality.
Like Tantallon, Neidpath fell victim to Cromwell's 17th-century artillery, which emphatically demonstrated the obsolescence of defensive architecture across Scotland. But unlike the more massive coastal castle, Neidpath continued to be occupied afterwards. It even had a brush with the Scottish Enlightenment, when in 1795 it became the residence of Adam Ferguson, a historian and philosopher widely seen as a founding father of modern sociology.
Ferguson, who rented the property from the Duke of Queensberry, was charmed by the beauty of the castle's situation. "The woods, the hills, and the river, are Elysian, and the atmosphere all composed of vital air," Ferguson wrote, expressing sentiments likely to be shared by a modern visitor. That was in summer, however, and he found winter conditions tougher. Ferguson was as much a master of his feelings as any Stoic, a biographer recounted, "but the discomforts attendant upon his residence at Neidpath were a sore trial for his philosophy".
To enjoy Neidpath from the water on a warm day, take a bus or drive to Peebles and from there follow the easy circular walk starting on the south side of the Tweed, crossing the river by the old viaduct and returning eastward to pass directly below the castle.

There is a popular swimming spot a little west of Neidpath with a fine view of the castle on its leafy bank, but for maximum visual drama use the little beach below it. From there, its ancient walls loom starkly against the sky. The current can be brisk and the river should never be entered when it is in spate.
The end of the St Andrews siege did not end the struggle to decide Scotland's religious and diplomatic loyalties. The resourceful Mary of Guise fought hard as regent to maintain Catholicism and ties with France. But by the time her daughter Mary Queen of Scots returned from France to exercise her monarchy in August 1561, Protestantism was dominant among the population and the fractious nobility, and ties with Protestant England increasingly close.
Though the younger Mary's religious tolerance and personal charisma initially stabilised her reign, less than seven years later a series of political missteps and disastrous alliances would leave her in ignominious imprisonment in Lochleven Castle.
Situated on a small island half a mile from the shore of the expansive Loch Leven, about halfway between Edinburgh and St Andrews, the castle seemed the most secure of prisons to the "Confederate Lords" who deposed Mary. Weakened by defeat and the traumatic miscarriage of twins, and under extreme psychological pressure, she agreed to abdicate in favour of her infant son, James. But as soon as her health returned she began to plan her escape. Less than a year after being ferried into captivity, she had won over some younger members of the Lochleven Castle household.
One, a page known as “Little Willie”, agreed to row her across the loch. On May 2 1568, Willie sabotaged all but one of the castle’s boats, then opened the main gate for Mary with a key purloined from the laird while he and his family were dining. By the loch shore, another household admirer was waiting for them with horses.
Within days, an army of 6,000 men had mustered to Mary's support. But panicking after defeat in a battle near Glasgow, she fled to England — a decision that led to long captivity and eventual execution. It was a sad end to one of history's most romantic royal escapes.
Partial draining in the 19th century reduced Loch Leven somewhat and increased the size of the island, but the sight of the castle across the water would still be recognisable to its regal former prisoner. To enjoy the view from the water, take a bus or drive to Kinross and walk to Kirkgate Park, where there is a pleasant sandy beach. Toxic blue-green algae can be an issue in the loch in summer months, so check boards for any warnings or ask locals for guidance, and avoid the water if there is any sign of a bloom.
*Note: Scottish law gives broad rights to responsible access to land and waters, but "wild" swimming is always at your own risk. To avoid unseen hazards and potentially dangerous cold-water shock, always enter the water cautiously. Tailor any swim carefully to your ability. Check ahead for strong currents, tides, algae or pollution
D
r Heidi Regenass's voice was warm and reassuring. The patient she was talking to had painful arthritic knees and Regenass had a plan to
"regenerate" them in "the most natural possible way".
The answer, she explained, lay in stem cells — master cells in the body that have the potential to self-renew and transform into other cell types. “Stem cells are fabulous,” she said to the FT reporter posing as a patient. “Coming from a newborn baby . . . [they can be] sent all over your body.”
Regenass, a physician at the time working at Chara Health clinic in Los Angeles, described how stem cells extracted from donated umbilical cords and placentas could heal tissue and reduce inflammation.
To achieve “the very best result”, she suggested injecting them directly into the knee and intravenously into the bloodstream. The therapy would cost \$18,450.
Regenass did not mention that the treatment is scientifically unproven and its sale is illegal under federal law. Nor did she mention that the owner of Chara Health had twice received warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for marketing the unapproved new drugs. The latest reprimand, from last year, also noted several manufacturing violations found by FDA inspectors, including missing donor eligibility records and expired products relabelled as in date.
Instead, Regenass breezed past a question about risks. “There’s always a risk of potentially infection, bleeding, but these products are very, very carefully screened so these chances are very, very minimal,” she said. An administrator later emailed a list of dozens of conditions the clinic claimed stem cells could benefit, from autism to diabetes and erectile dysfunction.
Since the 1950s, medicine has utilised stem cells' regenerative qualities in treatments such as bone marrow transplants and skin grafts. Scientists are examining their potential effectiveness for conditions from Parkinson's disease to heart problems. But despite encouraging breakthroughs in specific ailments, these other therapeutic uses remain largely hypothetical, confined to research and clinical trials.
In the US, however, a growing market of manufacturers and practitioners is selling empty promises about stem cell products directly to the American public. Billed as the ticket to longer life and a remedy for chronic conditions, the therapies have spread from the preserve of the super-wealthy exploring longevity treatments overseas to domestic high street clinics drawing in salaried workers.
It is a marketplace populated by pseudoscientific claims, spurious products and disgraced doctors seemingly impervious to the threat of federal enforcement. An FT investigation of clinics that have attracted FDA scrutiny found that many were flouting the regulator's warnings, using a smokescreen of new websites, euphemistic marketing, misleading claims and tongue-in-cheek compliance while continuing to operate much as before.
According to studies by Leigh Turner, director of the Center for Health Ethics at the University of California, Irvine, the handful of clinics offering unproven stem cell therapies in the late 2000s had grown to nearly 600 by 2016 and more than 2,700 in 2021. Turner has not yet published more recent data but says "there has been marketplace growth despite an increase in regulatory activity".
Experts say the situation is likely to worsen under US health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. He has said a stem cell treatment in Antigua “enormously” helped him and pledged to end the FDA’s “war” against alternative medicines, including “the war on stem cells”. Widely followed figures including Joe Rogan and Kim Kardashian have also raised the treatments’ profile, publicly praising procedures in Mexico and Panama, where licensed clinics can lawfully perform stem cell therapies.
"This is a major public health problem," says Sean Morrison, former president of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR). "Not only are [providers] very commonly marketing things that have no potential to benefit the patients, but they do have a very real potential to harm people."
At Chara Health, for example, there was one more thing Regenass did not mention. A few months earlier, the California medical board had launched a disciplinary proceeding against her for “repeated negligent acts” in a liposuction and fat transfer procedure. In 2023 and 2025, she was sued for medical malpractice by the families of three women who died after she performed similar operations on them.
Regenass has denied any negligence
Sweta Patel, who spent \$6,000 on a 'bogus' stem cell therapy, says other treatments she has had have worked but that an increase in unethical providers has made it difficult to distinguish their claims from those based on legitimate scientific research, right. Below: Shane Goddard, who travelled from the US to Mexico for a stem cell treatment that nearly left him paralysed Dario Pignatelli/FT, Alamy; Ray Di Pietro/FT
and that her care caused the women's deaths. One case has been settled, another dismissed and the third is ongoing. Regenass and Chara Health did not respond to a request for comment.
“Think of cell environments as a tightly controlled and well-balanced ecosystem,” explains Zubin Master, a member of the ISSCR’s public policy committee. Removing a cell from that ecosystem, even briefly, means “it may not behave as it once did”, Master says. “This is why cell replacement therapies are so complex and challenging.”
A treatment for heart failure being developed in the UK, for example, has taken 20 years of research to reach the final stage of clinical trials.
In the US, a peer-reviewed study published this year tested six commercial umbilical cord “stem cell” products and found they were all “virtually devoid of viable cells”, meaning the therapy could not even work in principle.
Experts' concerns are not just about
Disentangling well-evidenced science about stem cells from claims that are exaggerated or outright false can be challenging. Chara Health, for example, claims stem cells can “home in to areas needing repair”, “modulate the immune system” and “differentiate into a variety of cell types”.
efficacy, however. When bone marrow transplants were first developed, patients in the initial clinical trials died. "It literally took decades of work in order to figure out how to deliver the bone marrow transplants safely to patients," says Morrison, the former ISSCR president.
In a broad sense, these statements are true. But the idea that harnessing these benefits is as simple as extracting stem cells and transplanting them where they are needed is false.
Without regulated trials, the scale of harmful incidents caused by unapproved therapies is impossible to determine. But what information has been shared with the FDA suggests they are on the rise. According to an FT analysis of the regulator's adverse events database, the agency received reports of 17 incidents linked to stem cells or other unapproved human tissue products in 2025, compared with five the year before.
A Pew review of scientific journals, newspapers and other public sources found more than 330 adverse incidents documented between 2004 and 2020, including patients left with life-long disabilities and 20 reported deaths.
Many individuals seeking out stem cell therapies are part of the multitrillion-dollar industry pursuing the elusive goal of “longevity”. The treatments are often sold in combination with peptides and other unproven injectables at the forefront of the health-science culture wars.
But the therapies are also increasingly targeted at people hoping to escape suffering, not mortality.
When Shane Goddard was a teenager, a spinal cord injury from a dirt bike accident left him with a permanent limp and pain in his right leg. In 2022, the 41-year-old travelled from Tennessee to Giostar clinic in Mexico and paid \$15,695 for “140 million” umbilical cord stem cells to be injected into his spine.
Shortly afterwards, Goddard developed a high fever and burning pain in his back. “It felt like hot tar was in between my shoulder blades,” he says. Weeks later, Goddard started to lose movement in his fingers and drag his leg “like an animal hit by a car”. A scan revealed an infected abscess was flattening his spinal cord. Doctors told him if they did not perform emergency surgery he could be paralysed by the next morning. Goddard ended up in hospital for six weeks and still can’t use his hands today. “I went and got these stem cells in the hope of getting better and it has made me so much worse,” he says.
Giostar did not respond to a request for comment.

In the US, new drugs and biological products need FDA approval. The agency typically requires clinical trials to demonstrate they are safe and effective. Marketing them without this approval is illegal.
In the late 2010s, after years of light-touch oversight, the FDA issued a flurry of warning letters to stem cell companies and publicly pledged a firmer approach to enforcement.
"The FDA realised . . . this was getting out of hand," says Morrison. "The problem was that even when the FDA started being more aggressive . . . they really didn't have the resources to go after the large numbers of companies that were violating the law."
Instead, the regulator and justice department focused on the worst actors. In 2024, a California-based stem cell product manufacturer was sentenced to 36 months in prison for distributing unapproved new drugs. The injectables, made from umbilical cord cells, had been linked to the hospitalisation of 19 people. In 2019, a federal court brought an injunction against a clinic in Florida after three patients who received stem cell products harvested from their own fat went blind.
But such high-profile cases have not had a chilling effect. Of the 25 organisations that have received FDA warning letters for marketing unapproved stem cell products since 2021, the FT found that many appeared to have continued to flout the regulator's rules – a situation the FDA says it is aware of.
"Warning letters and enforcement actions are done to give a signal [in industries] where well-behaving people will tighten up their behaviour, but here you are dealing with a rogue industry," says Robert Califf, a former FDA commissioner. "This is outside of that."
Dr Alvaro Skupin, the founder of Mother Stem Institute in Florida, for example, was put on notice by the FDA in September 2024. The year before, Skupin settled a lawsuit brought against him by a woman who claimed that a stem cell treatment he injected into her eyes left her blind. (Skupin denied any wrongdoing.)
But during a phone consultation with an FT reporter purporting to be a prospective patient, Skupin downplayed the risk of his procedures and made sweeping pseudoscientific claims. Claiming to have a "94 per cent" success rate, he said that extracting a patient's blood and "burning a laser" would produce "pluripotent stem cells" that could "improve the knees, the tendons, the bones, maybe the prostate" when reinjected.
website of a family discussing their autistic son did not mention stem cells, instead referring unspecifically to “the Innate Healthcare Institute therapy” he had. But the website does describe the clinic’s “S.T.E.M. approach to care: Safety-first. Transparent. Evidence-informed. Mindful.” The Stem acronym appears above a disclaimer that some services are not FDA-approved.
When approached by an FT reporter posing as a patient who has an autistic daughter, a doctor at Innate suggested injecting the “kiddo” with stem cells through an IV and using a nasal spray. “It’s very effective for autism,” she said, adding that the clinic had treated children as young as two before. “We have to be careful about how we market it because of our government in the US . . . It’s not a ‘treatment,’” she said, making air quotes and smiling knowingly. “It’s an experimental option.”
“Whatever damage is done to almost any organ. Diabetes also. It will get better,” Skupin continued. He offered the reporter a “Father’s day special” discount and said the treatment could make him feel 10 years younger.
Other clinics have taken creative approaches to toeing the regulatory line. In August 2025, the FDA wrote to the Innate Healthcare Institute in Arizona, warning it to stop marketing unapproved stem cell therapies. The letter highlighted a customer statement on Innate's website that said: "Stem cell therapy has really helped our son with his autism." This week, a video on the
'Not only are [providers] commonly marketing things that have no potential to benefit the patients, but they do have a very real potential to harm people'
Skupin and Innate Healthcare Institute did not respond to a request for comment.
The legal landscape for unapproved stem cell therapies has been complicated in recent years by new state laws at loggerheads with federal regulation.
'If you want to spend money on an intervention, you should only do that if the benefits outweigh the risk'
Since 2024, states such as Florida, Utah and Wyoming have introduced bills that allow physicians to perform unapproved stem cell therapies under certain caveats. Local laws cannot usurp federal enforcement, but Master, of the

ISSCR's public policy committee, says he has seen a "fair degree of confusion" among the public. "It's confusing when in one state they see 'buyer beware' and in another state, not," he says.
Some clinics are exploiting this complicated environment. Chara Health, for example, claims in marketing material that its stem cell products are “completely unmanipulated, qualifying them as tissue transplants”, not drugs. That is incorrect, according to warning letters sent by the regulator to the clinic’s founder, Dr Joy Kong, in 2019 and 2025.
The FDA says stem cell therapies are “an active and escalating enforcement priority”. It adds that “protecting patients . . . is a core and enduring part of the agency’s work, regardless of the broader environment”.
Some patients say that the decision whether to use stem cell therapies should be theirs, not the government's.
In 2023, Sweta Patel spent \$6,000 on a “bogus” stem cell treatment in Utah that had no noticeable effect. But Patel, who lives in chronic pain due to several autoimmune disorders, says other stem cell treatments she has had in the past transformed her symptoms “like night and day”. She thinks the industry has become awash with unethical providers partly because it is forced to exist outside of regulation. “Those of us with rare or misunderstood illnesses are the easiest to exploit,” she says.
Health secretary Kennedy has echoed this argument. He said last year the FDA should not “tell physicians what they can and cannot prescribe” or tell people what drugs they can take. “If you want to take an experimental drug . . . you ought to be able to,” he said last year.
But many experts do not agree. “Individual patients and even their physicians don’t have the time or the expertise or the access to the data that’s necessary to truly make an informed decision about whether an experimental regenerative medicine product actually does have the potential to help,” Morrison of the ISSCR says.
While Califf acknowledges “there’s a flexibility of thinking that is needed here that is not easily handled by the regulatory regime”, he also disputes that the barriers to FDA approval are too high. “If you want to spend money on an intervention,” he says, “you should only do that if the benefits outweigh the risk. And we completely understand how to determine if the benefits outweigh the risk . . . It’s called an adequate, well-controlled clinical trial.”
But for now, a crackdown on cowboy clinics seems unlikely. When asked whether the US health secretary would be a deterrent to enforcement efforts, Califf said: "RFK is the greatest champion for unproven and perhaps dangerous treatments in the US.
"The FDA reports to RFK. So that's sort of a rhetorical question."


FINANCIAL TIMES
'Without fear and without favour'
ft.com/opinion
Each year in late August, falling overnight temperatures in western Wyoming send trout in the Snake River into a feeding frenzy before winter. These optimal fishing conditions first led Paul Volcker, former Federal Reserve chair and an avid fly fisherman, to host the Fed's annual conference there. The Jackson Hole symposium convenes central bankers, finance ministers and economists to discuss monetary policy, network and, occasionally, cast a line.
Like the trout, the current Fed chair Kevin Warsh has a difficult few months ahead – and many market participants will be scouring his Jackson Hole speech today for signals on how he plans to deal with them. The ongoing conflict with Iran injects uncertainty into markets, and oil prices remain above prewar lev els. Inflation is running persistently above the central bank's 2 per cent target. US government debt is climbing ever higher and is made more burdensome by higher yields.
The massive spending on the AI build-out appears to be pushing up borrowing rates, crowding out other sectors of the economy, and raising important questions for monetary policymakers. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent's interventions in the bond market add an additional layer that threatens to complicate how monetary policy is set.
But some of the Fed chair's challenges are of his own making. Warsh has long expressed a distaste for central banks projecting forward guidance to markets, but his sparse communication style has added to confusion in markets. Amid limited insight into his thinking on key questions about the state of the economy, investors have sent long-term bond yields to their highest levels since 2007. The IMF has released a pointed note on "Current Issues in Forward
Guidance." Warsh himself seems to be aware of his failure to communicate successfully his commitment to price stability to markets but is unmoved.
Much of this is, of course, by design. Warsh has focused on how higher interest rates on longer-dated bonds can do some work to decrease borrowing and tame inflation, and there is some truth in this less conventional approach. But questions of institutional credibility are at stake. As Warsh has diverted attention from inflationary pressure on the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates, he has acquiesced to President Donald Trump's preference for lower short-term rates. If the Fed chair is even perceived to be acting politically, markets can punish Treasuries and the dollar.
Other parts of the federal policy apparatus have talked of steps to keep down borrowing costs, from Bessent's plans to double purchases of long-dated bonds to the president's bizarre reference to military intervention in discussing the bond market. These episodes have
If he is even perceived to be acting politically, markets can punish Treasuries and the dollar
unsurprisingly done little to reassure bond investors. Even Stanley Drucken-miller, a one-time mentor figure to both Warsh and Bessent, has argued against the outsized role that the Treasury is playing, proclaiming that “governments defending prices against fundamentals always lose”.
Warsh's Jackson Hole speech could be a chance to get on a better footing with markets. Many past chairs have seized the moment to modify policy, such as Ben Bernanke's pivotal 2010 speech announcing additional asset purchases. Warsh has repeatedly made verbal commitments to central bank independence and a 2 per cent inflation rate, but these commitments mean little without details of how they will be achieved. Hesitancy to provide more insight into his thinking has created an uncertainty premium that affects the financing of everything from home mortgages to emerging market sovereign debt. Investors will hope his speech can begin to reduce that uncertainty.
Opinion Artificial intelligence

Soumaya Keynes

E
conomists are a fashion-conscious bunch. In the 2000s and 2010s it was cool to work on and with new digital companies. In 2020
they swung towards Covid-19 research with the enthusiasm of an Instagram-mer learning to bake bread. And now, covering AI and working with the AI labs is hot. Although some of the risks have echoes of the past, this time feels different.
One difference is the vast scope of questions AI is raising. It's one thing to tinker with taxi or hotel markets, and quite another to explore a technology that could fundamentally reshape society. In the 2000s and 2010s, the digital revolution attracted star researchers and raised new questions. But because the AI revolution is bigger and broader, today there is a “completely different scale of sucking
sound", says Ben Golub, an academic with an AI start-up of his own.
As AI presents economists with both a tool of analysis and a topic of study, one interesting trend has been elite economists either collaborating with AI companies, or working for them directly. This year there has been a “discontinuous change in perception”, as AI labs are now seen as “super-high value places to be intellectually”, says Golub. It helps that they have detailed data describing AI usage, which is key to estimating its economic effects.
The hunt for economists by AI-related start-ups could be cynically dismissed as a PR ploy. Credible analysis of proprietary data from highly educated nerds is more likely to get media attention than a fluffy press release. After sharing analysis of business spending on AI tools, Ara Kharazian, Ramp's chief economist, reported being inundated with requests for advice from AI start-ups looking to start their own economics teams.
But the bigger AI labs seem to have grander ambitions, to inject evidence into conversations about their technology. Aware of AI's seismic potential, researchers at Google, Anthropic and OpenAI have been tasked with informing the debate over AI's effects on labour markets, global inequality and the macroeconomy. One Google researcher framed the research agenda to me as being a part of corporate responsibility.
The obvious risk is that closer collaborations will distort the direction of economic research. Why would the AI labs want to release research showing that their products make work less meaningful or more intense? Would they be as keen to support researchers warning that AI will discourage investment in skills as they would those who seem optimistic about its effect on entrepreneurship?
Potential “capture” was a challenge during the last tech boom, as tech companies controlled who could access their vast troves of data, and had private interests in how it was used. One recent study noted that European papers published using platform-provided data were disproportionately about the effects on consumers, rather than, say, labour rights. (Admittedly, they only picked up 31 such studies.)
Quizzing some economists who are part of this latest tech wave, I heard cautious optimism that conflicts of interest could be manageable. Although it's true that the labs have probably drawn economists who are likely to think that AI is a big deal, those researchers don't agree among themselves how it will play out. One pointed out that Dario Amodei, Anthropic's CEO, hasn't exactly been promising that AI would deliver rainbows and sunbeams.
Within the AI labs, economists have been thinking about how to ensure their own credibility. Earlier this year Anthropic's economics team published a framework for measuring AI-fuelled labour market disruption. Chief economist Peter McCrory explained that by tying their hands to a particular method, it shouldn't be possible to suppress bad results. The labs also seem keener to share data publicly than some of their predecessors, though not enough to erode the insiders' advantage.
As for the collaborations, it's not yet clear how onerous the research approval processes will be. One researcher said he didn't think OpenAI's funding grants were large enough to get big cheeses to suppress or change results. Economists have reputations to maintain; several of those working with the labs are only on leave from university positions.
All that said, as the public backlash against AI grows, so too will pressure on the AI labs to shape the narrative around their technology positively. And where those pressures are strongest, the presence of researchers with distance from the labs will be vital. After all, there's one final difference between this tech boom and the last: the stakes are higher this time.
soumaya.keynes@ft.com
Letters
If you are not satisfied with the FT's response to your complaint, you can appeal to the FT Editorial Complaints Commissioner: complaints.commissioner@ft.com
Scott Bessent, US Treasury secretary ("An economic D-Day is coming for Iran", Opinion, August 25), channels President Donald Trump's understandable frustration about winning the war he started in Iran some six months ago.
Iran has made clear that so many of Trump's claims are just empty boasts. Initially he talked about the war lasting four or five weeks, though noting it could last longer (ironically, his one true statement), having previously "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear capacity. In March he also claimed to have "literally obliterated" its military capacities.
Realising the unpopularity of Trump's military venture, Bessent
Brian Hie, who wrote the landmark paper, noted his work was funded by philanthropy and government grants. The same sources of capital, backing the research end of biosecurity, have an opportunity to fund this inexpensive, far more immediate, form of preparedness too.
Your report on a new paper on AI-generated synthetic viruses (August 7) captures a genuine milestone, and Thomas Inglesby and Moritz Hanke at Johns Hopkins University are right that existing governance frameworks are not equipped for what generative genomics now makes possible. As they put it in Science magazine: "The question is no longer whether this technology will exist, but whether oversight can keep pace with it."
Anchorage, AK, US
Building that oversight matters, and will take years. But if we are funding the research that creates these capabilities, we should also be funding and prioritising the resilience that prepares us for what they might eventually produce. One way is by improving ventilation in schools, where ordinary respiratory viruses spread widely and where children are disproportionate drivers of transmission into communities.
wants to once again bring to bear the weight of America's economic power, by threatening actions against those who aid Iran, including through trade.
Andy Burnham's promise to increase local council planning powers in the high street is to be welcomed ("PM cracks down on bookies and vape shops", Report, August 11).
He doesn't seem to understand the changed economic realities: Brazil, China, and now even Canada have stood up to him; they have not capitulated. And not surprisingly, the US has a diminishing share of global GDP, many of the cards are not in Trump's hand, and there is a limit to which a bully can push others around. This is especially true when issues of national sovereignty are at stake. It can be politically unviable to give in.
We too used to have similar shops in our high streets but that was many moons ago. They were the likes of Dewhurst the master butcher, Three Cooks bakeries and Mac Fisheries.
But the prime minister also needs to pop over to France, to see for himself how that country has managed to help small shops survive and thrive. French petits commerces are still at the heart of daily life there. I am referring to the abundant presence of boulangeries, pâtisseries and charcuteries.
The French have succeeded in keeping theirs to this day simply because their planning laws heavily restrict and regulate any proposals on combining shops. Such projects require building permits for structural or facade changes.
Even if Trump doesn't care about his waning popularity, in real democracies governments do care about such
Another measure that helped small shops in France was their 1968 law banning supermarkets from television advertising. This helped traditional neighbourhood stores compete with big hypermarkets. Pressure from the

"AT LEAST IT'S GOOD FOR THE DATA CENTRES"
European Commission led France to lift the TV ban but only after 38 years, by which time the measure had by then served to embed France's small shops.
We all remember the phrase attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte, that England is a nation of shopkeepers. He was alluding to us as a nation of little ambition that is far too concerned with commerce to be a match for the French army.
As Burnham now seeks to spend more on our army, perhaps he can also adopt some, if not all, of the aforementioned French measures to protect our petits commerces and thereby erase Napoleon's slur and truly make us a nation of shopkeepers again.
Cllr Stephen Alambritis
London SM4, UK
Reading your Big Read on the risks of financing data centres (August 26), I feel the whole page article could be summarised by the “chicken and egg” problem identified by insurers – “that they lacked the data to model risks facing data centres, which has made them warier”.
Just as the protest against data centre construction can be summed up in the satirical magazine Private Eye's succinct observation that “locals have a sentimental attachment to their water supply”, so I feel echoes of Paul Theroux's 1981 novel The Mosquito Coast coming on and the catastrophic explosion of the “Fat Boy” ice-making machine, which Allie Fox, the novel's main character, runs on hydrogen and ammonia in steamy Honduras.
Maybe the insurers mentioned in your report should read the novel, while waiting for their data. Jane Swan Delahola, Cornwall, UK
China is by far the largest purchaser of Iran's oil, that country's critical export. China used its control of rare earths and minerals and magnets to fight back against Trump's (illegal) tariffs – and Trump backed down, as a more reasonable agreement was forged in October 2025, less than a year ago.
Delabole, Cornwall, UK
matters. Besides, governments around the world realise an agreement with Trump isn't worth the paper it's written on.
While the US has not provided details of the new economic war it's waging, if Bessent's threats are to have real impact, China has to give in, an unlikely compromise of its economic sovereignty and another demonstration that agreements
Your Big Read (“The UAE’s imperial push into Africa”, August 4) publishes a claim that stolen Sudanese central bank gold was flown from South Sudan to the UAE. While the conflict in Sudan is a tragedy demanding serious global attention, this reporting conflates and confuses alleged private transit with implied sovereign state procurement and supplies no substantive evidence of either.
The UAE as a sovereign nation does not buy or import commercial bullion. The alleged destinations and flight paths are neither evidence of general purchase nor of state procurement. What should have triggered your scepticism was the idea that multiple consignments of gold from a bank raid were traced secretly travelling hundreds of miles in multiple directions across Africa to meet up on an airfield in South Sudan.
You claim that an unspecified volume of gold crossed into Chad, a country separated from its alleged port of departure by Sudan itself and the Central African Republic. If bullion indeed moved through multiple porous borders and transit hubs, accountability would reside throughout the entire chain, and not on a single nation, based on the knitting together of anonymous, implausible accounts.
The bullion, 1.5 tonnes, represents barely 0.1 per cent of the UAE's annual gold imports. To suggest that a UAE sovereign authority would risk its international standing and regulatory alignment for a fraction of a per cent of its market turnover defies commercial and strategic sense.
The UAE recognises the real difficulties in tracking and tracing gold, which is harder to achieve than your article suggests. For the record, the UAE is one of the few countries to have incorporated the LBMA's (London Bullion Market Association) Responsible Gold Guidance document into federal law, aligning it with the OECD “due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas”. The framework requires risk assessment, independent review and reporting at every licensed refiner in the country.
The UAE is proud to be advancing transparency across critical mineral supply chains. As such, I extend an open invitation to your reporters and editors to attend the Dubai Precious Metals Conference this November to inspect our regulatory framework and published trade ledgers first-hand. Ahmed Bin Sulayem Executive Chairman and CEO, DMCC (Dubai Multi Commodities Centre), UAE
Email: letters.editor@ft.com
Include daytime telephone number and full address Corrections: corrections@ft.com
with the US don't mean much.
Trump was elected on a platform to make America great again. But he and Bessent won't accomplish this by bullying other countries – this will fail just as Bessent's efforts to manipulate the bond market failed.
To the contrary, countries are doing what they can to become less dependent on the US, thereby diminishing US economic power.
Bessent declared an economic D-Day. It took almost four years to win that war, and many lives and heavy expenditures – but it was a just and popular war. This time, Bessent is setting up the US for another failure. Joseph E Stiglitz New York, NY, US
The claim that Britain's game shooting industry generates about £70mn each year needs a bit more explanation ("Glorious 12th kicks off UK shooting season as debate rages about its future", Report, August 12).
The figure includes the value generated in many adjacent sectors and activities that would be there anyway, without game shooting. Second, you should net off the large amounts of public funding these shooting estates enjoy. Furthermore, the millions being spent in our uplands on conservation, especially peat restoration is necessary to put right the damage caused since the advent of the sport in the Victorian era. For example, the public cost of the large-scale draining of moorlands – to encourage heather growth and so sustain the large numbers of grouse necessary for commercial shooting – covers places like Calderdale and Swaledale, which has suffered devastating floods in recent years partly because of the land management practices on the moorlands and intensive livestock grazing.
Despite the receipt of such payments, it has been identified that only 25 per cent of peatlands, many of which are used for grouse shooting, are in good ecological status (“State of Nature Report” report, Campaign for National Parks, 2023).
That some large estates have also benefited for many years from inheritance tax exemptions because of the so-called “public good” they are said to represent, but rarely do, is another argument to rethink the use of our uplands. The debate therefore should not be about the too often polarised perspectives of shooting versus revwilding but that of recognising the current crises of nature depletion and climate. Such vast areas of our uplands should be nature- and species-rich, providing awe inspiring places for people to explore. Our uplands belong to the public, not to a small rich elite. Jonathan Riley
Chair, Friends of the Dales, Gargrave, North Yorkshire, UK
Reading Scott Bessent's jingoistic op-ed entitled "An economic D-Day is coming for Iran" (August 25), he mistakenly omitted to include Joseph Stalin, who also attended the 1943 Tehran Conference alongside Roosevelt and Churchill. As to the accuracy of the rest of the piece, I am unable to say. Mike Harris Oxford, UK
Stephen Miran
C
ontrary to the assertions of some commentators, the recent rise in interest rates on long-dated US Treasuries is not indicative of financial
markets starting to question the soundness of US debt, nor of credibility problems at the Federal Reserve.
To see why, we can divide the yield investors receive into a real component and a component that reflects expected inflation. The most reliable metric of inflation expectations comes from the inflation swaps market, which has been extremely well behaved; inflation expectations are consistent with the Fed's 2 per cent target at every tenor and across the forward curve. It's therefore inappropriate to say the increase in yields has anything to do with central bank credibility – that rests entirely on expectations that it will achieve its infla tion target, which markets show absolutely no sign of doubting.
By contrast, the real component of the interest rate has moved up. Ten-year real yields are equal to the average expected overnight yield over the next ten years, plus a risk premium that investors demand for locking up their money for ten years. This term premium reflects the fact that realised overnight rates might deviate from expected overnight rates. If the market saw fiscal credibility or debt sustainability problems, this would show up in an increased term premium.
But the term premium has also been stable and is only a hair lower since the end of last year. With term premium and inflation expectations contained, the recent rise in bond yields is almost entirely due to higher expected overnight rates over the long term. In other words, investors are marking up their expectations for long-run economic growth, not becoming concerned over central bank or fiscal credibility. The market could be recognising that AI, deregulation and better tax policy are turbocharging the American economy.
Better growth is great news for the fiscal path. A useful rule of thumb is that one percentage point faster economic growth will reduce deficits by about a percentage point of GDP, because revenues grow faster than outlays and interest payments in a booming economy. Rates have been rising for good reasons, to good effect.
Recently, US deficits have swollen
temporarily because of fluctuating tariff rates. In February, before the Supreme Court struck a chunk of them down, tariffs were forecast by the Congressional Budget Office to raise \$418bn in 2026, "exceeding corporate income tax receipts for the first time since at least 1934". What should have been the largest revenue raise in history outside of income taxes turned into a temporary revenue drain as over \$100bn in tariff refunds has been paid thus far, causing net tariff revenue to drastically undershoot forecasts.
As the refunds phase out and the administration returns tariff rates to their earlier levels, the revenue will kick back in. Between swinging tariff revenue and better growth, primary deficits will soon start to decline. Many of the same people who complain most loudly about deficits were also the most eager to reject tariff revenue that would reduce deficits.
And as the energy shock from the Iran conflict fades into the background, inflation and interest rates will come down too, cutting the deficit even further. Undoubtedly, there is more work to do on entitlements and reining in wasteful spending. But as tariffs and better growth kick in, long-run fiscal problems are pushed further out.
The long end of the yield curve is the least liquid segment, and August the least liquid month. With deficit reduction around the corner due to tariffs, growth and disinflation, Treasury secretary Scott Bessent is completely right to fight needless volatility by providing additional liquidity, and to resist calls to prematurely term out Treasury issuance by lengthening its maturity. Improved liquidity helps ensure orderly market functioning in the Treasury market, essential for financial stability.
Shorter-maturity debt issuance is the orthodox response to temporarily wider deficits and that response is a key part of regular and predictable debt management. Permanently wider deficits would be a different story, but that's not the case here. Encouraging unnecessary excess volatility at the long end of the yield curve is the wrong move if the deficit will be coming down. It would be bad for financial markets, bad for American workers and bad for taxpayers.
The US is in a good spot as far as both fiscal and monetary credibility are concerned, and all the signs are that the bond market agrees.
The writer is senior strategist at Hudson Bay Capital and former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and was a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors
TECHNOLOGY
John Thornhill


umanoid robots can do astonishing things. As demonstrated at the World Humanoid Robot Games in Beijing this week, they can run, box, play football, take on obstacle courses and perform synchronised cheerleading routines. One robot even beat Usain Bolt's record for the 100-metre sprint (although it couldn't slow down in time to avoid smashing into a padded wall afterwards).
Such feats helped Unitree Robotics, a leading Chinese humanoid robot developer, pull off a heavily oversubscribed listing on the Shanghai Stock Exchange this month. Unitree's shares initially surged, giving it a market value of \$51bn at the end of first-day trading, but have fallen back sharply since.
In the US, Elon Musk has been making bombastic claims about Tesla's Optimus robot, which is increasingly a main focus of his electric car company. This humanoid robot, Musk predicted, would probably be the "biggest product ever", forecasting up to \$10tn in sales in the long term.
At the Beijing games, billed as the "best of the bots", humanoid robots are the stars and certainly generate a wow factor on YouTube. But as with some human influencers, you wonder if they have much purpose beyond entertaining us. If technology, as the saying goes, is about making machines act like they do in the movies, then these robots certainly fit the bill. But they are more likely to be the show ponies than the workhorses of our robotic future.
Humanoid robots at the games struggled with more dexterous tasks, such as clearing a dining table or plugging in an electric vehicle charger. Besides, some roboticists have always argued that mimicking the human form is an odd way to build the most capable robots. A humanoid robot may have to incorporate 30 axes of motion when simpler designs can perform similar functions with half that number. That can make humanoids costlier and clumsier.
The vast majority of the world's installed non-humanoid robots are more functional in design and mostly perform single operations, making them a lot less videogenic. These robots do some of the dull, dirty, delicate and dangerous work that humans no longer want to do. They can assemble cars, fetch items in warehouses and perform routine surgery. The world's militaries are also rushing to deploy drones at massive scale given their devastating use in the Russia-Ukraine war. These are the areas where most robots are currently used and where most money is probably to be made.
Right now, China dominates industrial robotics. The International Federation of Robotics estimates it has an installed base of about 2mn industrial robots, 4.5 times more than Japan, the world's second-biggest market.

Robotics is also central to China's 15th Five-Year Plan. As of 2024, China accounted for about 54 per cent of new global installations of industrial robots, with Europe at 16 per cent and the US on 6 per cent.
Like other Asian countries, including Japan and South Korea, China has a strong incentive to adopt robots to compensate for an ageing workforce. Partly as a result, perceptions of robots are far more favourable in Asia than in the US or Europe, easing the path to adoption.
As the world's software superpower, the US still provides the best robotic "brains." And the prize for creating the standard robotic operating system of
The ultimate vision is communities of cobots that learn from each other by tapping into a 'hive' mind the future may be enormous. The Trump administration is trying to boost domestic robotics manufacturing by restricting mostly Chinese imports. The US Federal Communications Commission has just blocked the import of foreign-made humanoid and quadruped robots, citing national security risks.
That points to one way humanoid robots may prove their economic value: as providers of data to guide future developments. The internet provides vast amounts of information to train AI large language models, such as ChatGPT and Claude. But roboticists desperately need more visual and sensory data to improve how their creations interpret and respond to the physical world. "One of the huge challenges the robotics industry is facing is the lack of training data for AI," Susanne Bieller, general secretary of the IFR, tells me.
Robotics companies are generating synthetic data for training purposes, most notably in the autonomous car industry. Spookily, some AI companies are also amassing so-called egocentric data, harvested by attaching video cameras to the heads of Indian textile workers to capture their movements, for example. This development raises very obvious concerns about privacy, security and control. But if these can be overcome, humanoid robots, operating alongside humans as collaborative robots (or cobots), could act as interconnectors between AI models and the real world. The ultimate vision is communities of cobots that constantly learn from each other by tapping into a collective "hive" mind.
This school of thought suggests “embodied” AI-powered robots may yet emerge as the more promising path to artificial general intelligence, when AI matches humans across all cognitive tasks. Simply scaling LLMs is not enough. By training robots to perceive, predict, act, fail and adapt, they will develop better causal reasoning and greater autonomy. If that ever happens, humanoid robots may finally earn their star billing, so long as they have learnt not to crash by then.
john.thornhill@ft.com

he White House website assures us that "President Donald J. Trump and Vice President JD Vance are waging war on the fraudsters and scammers who have looted hard-working Americans for far too long". But a closer look reveals a troubling selectivity that rarely reaches the biggest offenders – giving undeserved solicitude to those with political or economic power.
What kinds of crimes the federal government should prosecute has long been a matter of hot debate. Violent crime, for instance, was traditionally thought to be the responsibility of state and local authorities. But since the 1980s, both parties have touted their efforts to reduce violent crime. And now Trump brags about a decline in street crime that started before he became president and has little to do with federal efforts. Meanwhile, the administration has made clear it would prefer to avoid prosecuting serious environmental crimes.
One would think that crimes directly affecting the federal government, particularly frauds that deprive the government of money it needs to sustain its operations, would be one area of consensus. But the Trump administration's emphasis on benefit fraud while it abandons cases against large corporations and wealthy executives highlights how constrained resources will always leave room for policy choices.
The problem is not new, and has shaped federal criminal enforcement from the start. The early American republic depended on customs revenue – the tariffs that Alexander Hamilton and his successors at the Treasury championed. Yet when it came to pursuing merchants who fraudulently deprived the government of this critical revenue, US attorneys – in charge of federal prosecutions long before the creation of the justice department in 1870 – and customs officials brought forfeiture cases against ships and goods. This early form of corporate criminal liability had the virtue of penalising people in proportion to their interest in a venture, but it allowed individuals to escape personal criminal sanctions. In contrast, postal employees who stole postal funds were regularly prosecuted and could even face the death penalty.
The establishment of the Internal Revenue Service during the civil war
brought a new focus on tax prosecutions, which soon dominated the federal criminal docket. But the disproportionate targeting of those lacking political power remained. Most of those cases charged moonshiners for operating illegal stills, rather than large-scale alcohol or tobacco firms that developed sophisticated evasion strategies.
The 20th century brought a massive expansion of federal enforcement interests, and, in time, drug and violent crime-related prosecutions began to loom larger in the federal docket than tax cases. Indeed, for the last half-century, there has been a growing hostility to tax enforcement by federal leaders interested in spending money without raising it. Serious tax enforcement has thus become politicised, with the Biden administration's massive boost for IRS funding reversed under Trump.
In part because of congressional pressure, criminal prosecutions of low-income taxpayers for fraud involving the earned income credit have long been prioritised at the expense of higher-value tax cheats. The Trump administration's starvation of the IRS, coupled with louder rhetoric from its Republican allies about benefit fraud (which, to be fair, is quite real), will only accentuate this skew, as low-value cases are generally easier and cheaper to pursue.
Even in healthcare where the White House's commitment to tackling fraud seems authentic, Trump appears to have put partisan politics first. Its recent enforcement efforts have prioritised blue states like California and Minnesota without giving any reason to believe that offending rates were higher there.
At a time when immigration convictions dominate the federal docket nationally (40.9 per cent), followed by drugs (21.8 per cent) and firearms (12.1 per cent), an increase in the number of governmental fraud prosecutions and the resources committed to them – indeed of white-collar cases generally – is surely in the public interest. These cases might even reduce the resources available to go after those who touch the Reflecting Pool or throw sandwiches at ICE agents.
But we should not let the Trump administration get away with case-counting or anti-fraud rhetoric that conceals a partisan agenda and leaves the wealthiest scofflaws withholding money from the government unscathed while targeting the poorest tax cheats.
The writer is a professor of law at Columbia University and a former prosecutor in the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Tarah Wheeler

few weeks ago I gave a talk to Indiana's public sector about how AI will impact cyber security. After the talk, an IT director told me
he was being pressured by his boss to "get everyone on AI" while still trying to figure out 20-year-old cyber security problems like staff using personal devices for business. I gave him a few cyber hygiene tips – but the fact is that new AI-augmented attacks are going to make the consequences of poor security far worse. The IT director was asking how to build a continental missile defence shield while his team still lacked the budget for a picket fence.
The explosion of AI-discovered security vulnerabilities means cyber attacks have become cheaper while defence has become more costly. The threat from so-called “rogue models” is also less predictable. OpenAI, Meta and Anthropic have all reported that their AI models “escaped containment”, finding vulnerabilities and exploits far beyond their instructions or the intent of their users.
I have experience building, running, analysing and adversarially testing generative AI tools, and the ability these Rube Goldberg machines have to quickly create a cheap digital pry bar for nearly any system is truly startling.
In the past, recognising likely vulnerabilities, putting together scripts to exploit them and repeating that process with tiny changes to map out a system's weaknesses took expertise and creativity. Now, it can be attempted in a fraction of the time and cost. The result is a two-tier capability gap. Publicly
available AI subscription models like Claude have safeguards that mostly prevent requests to create exploits. But those safeguards do not exist when someone runs open-weight models on their own hardware.
This means AI models are putting attack tools in the hands of people who have never run the ethical gauntlet of a career in cyber security. There were 642 ransomware and data breach incidents against US healthcare reported to the FBI in 2025 – more than any other critical infrastructure sector. These came with an average cost of \$7.4mn per breach and an as-yet-uncounted cost to the people hit by disruptions in services.
The number may rise further this year. I think we are still two to three years away from the point at which AI systems can do the patching needed to keep up with vulnerabilities in software.
Yet preventing AI attacks is not a government priority. The Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center, built to help US state and local governments, lost its federal funding in September 2025. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has been gutted as well.
Security researchers are disclosing vulnerabilities, tired of waiting for organisations to fix them. Anonymous researcher Nightmare Eclipse has already published details of several bugs affecting Microsoft.
The only hope is public-private partnerships. In April 2026, Anthropic set up Project Glasswing, an initiative to help discover and patch vulnerabilities. In June, however, Anthropic complied with a questionable US executive branch order to suspend access to its most capable models, Fable and Mythos.
Public-private partnerships require stability and credibility. Glasswing's stability was undermined when Anthropic cut off access to new models. Credibility was strained when Anthropic missed a 90-day deadline to release a report on the vulnerabilities found.
The IT director I spoke to does not need an AI innovation plan. He needs the shared cyber defences his country had until last September. The unglamorous work of cyber defence is invisible if done right. If it is not, the cost to human health, access to food and goods, transportation and even the ability to vote freely is a number so large that even the most confident of AIs will struggle to guess it.
The writer is an information security researcher and chief security officer at TPO Group
Simon Trott Chief Executive Officer, Rio Tinto


Meta is making some changes for teenage users — Josh Edelson/Bloomberg
retty much everybody — even Meta Platforms boss Mark Zuckerberg — concedes that social media can pose a grave threat to the mental health of minors. The \$18bn settlement Meta announced on Wednesday, the result of horse-trading between the tech group and US states and territories, will mitigate harm. But relying on mutual compromise is a flawed way to protect young users.
The money, in this case, is less significant than it sounds. True, as single-company settlements go, only oil group BP has paid more, according to advocacy group Good Jobs First. For the \$1.5tn Meta it is a pittance, though, and is spread over 10 years. Discount the instalments back at a rate of 15 per cent and the real hit today is less than \$8bn – barely in the top 20 of all-time wrist thwacks.
Meta is, though, making significant changes for teenage users of Instagram and Facebook, including disabling “extreme make-up” filters and adding screen-time prompts. Some measures, such as hiding numbers of “likes” on posts, should be potent. Ditto muting notifications during school time: a study by think-tank Common Sense showed teens get on average 237 notifications a day.
But others are weaker than they could be. Two-hour time caps, an essential guard against excessive use, can be overridden with parents' agreement. Personalised feeds can be disabled in favour of less manipulative chronological ones, but only if users or parents request it. Few will.
Moreover, if the goal is to protect children from harm, some aspects of the settlement defy logic. For example, \$5.3bn of Meta's payment – and even more conservative time limits for users – are only triggered if rivals TikTok and YouTube agree to similar restraints, and each shoulder a similar payout. The time caps expire after five years, though the dangers of addiction presumably do not.
Flaws point to the big problem with settlements: they are based on what both sides will tolerate. Meta wants to avoid unflattering court appearances. State attorneys-general want to score a win in reasonable time, and have strong incentives to avoid being sucked into ricocheting appeals that drag on for years.
States such as California and New York are still pushing for tougher local laws, and other lawsuits remain outstanding, but unlike in the UK and Europe, there is virtually no chance of US national regulation any time soon.
That's a big difference with Wall Street, another industry with a propensity to cause harm if left to run amok. There, too, fines have become little more than a cost of doing business. But regulations on capital and conduct are onerous, and are set based on analysis of what will ensure safety and soundness – rather than a negotiating tug of war. While it took a colossal financial crisis to get there, the current regime has basically worked for almost two decades.
The negative effects of social media on children's health are setting the scene for a crisis too. Meta's imperfect settlement shows how much there is to do, and how important it is to draw up consistent safeguards. If Silicon Valley does indeed pose a risk to children, adults, ecosystems or electoral systems, it is foolish to think payouts and compromises will do the job.
The US is paying more than 5 per cent to sell 30-year bonds for the first time in decades. This is not much fun for Treasury secretary Scott Bessent. One might think it's even less pleasant for his counterparts in emerging markets.
Classically, that would be true. In real, or inflation-adjusted terms, that 30-year Treasury yield is also the highest in a long time, at about 3 per cent. So is the real 10-year yield, at close to 2.5 per cent. When the returns on traditionally safe assets such as US bonds march higher, they usually suck capital from riskier assets such as EM bonds.
Not this time. Owning EM bonds has not been so terrible in the past year. JPMorgan indices for both those in local currencies and those in dollars are up about 8 to 9 per cent, in dollar terms, in the past 12 months, despite the Iran war shock. It helps that the dollar has not strengthened on the back of higher returns on US bonds.
Emerging markets are still relatively attractive investment destinations. Many of these markets have fought to lure investors with juicier real yields, setting policy rates well above inflation, since 2023 when US Treasury yields also rose a lot in real terms. Brazil's 10-year bonds have a yield after local inflation of about 10 per cent; South Africa's, around 4 per cent.
What's more, emerging markets — at least taken in aggregate — have become relatively less risky by fixing their fiscal deficits. Ninety One, an EM manager, makes the point by smoothing the countries in JPMorgan's local currency index excluding China into a "Republic of EM", and finds that this composite example of economic probity only outspends its tax revenue by 1 per cent of GDP, excluding interest costs.
And with the high rates in the US not crushing growth – yet – there is no reason to think that its imports of goods from emerging markets will fall. The US, meanwhile is cruising for overspending of 2.6 per cent of GDP this year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Aggregate figures mask divergence. Local currency yields in Thailand, South Korea and Malaysia are below the US in nominal and real terms – but these countries do not need to attract as much capital from abroad. And as a diversified asset class, EM bonds do not compare badly with the US.

High real rates are brutal for borrowers at home: Brazil's corporate bankruptcies point to that. But, at least, emerging markets have had some time to get used to them, and have kept their budgets mostly balanced to leave space to pay bondholders. That is a lesson Bessent will need to learn from capital-hungry emerging markets.
Vanguard is a champion of managing other people's money. Victory Capital has its own ambitions. Recent deals by both show that even with equity markets at record highs, the pressure to find new clients is mounting.
Privately owned Vanguard, best known for its cheap index funds, has agreed to buy Altruist, a technology platform for wealth managers, for an undisclosed price The Wall Street Journal pegs at \$4bn. Victory, a Texas-based asset manager, plans to take over First Eagle Investments in a cash and stock deal that would almost double its assets under management to \$600bn.
Both fit a wider trend. Asset manager mergers are gathering pace, even though markets are in good health, which might suggest there is plenty of profit in going it alone. Victory had
tried to gatecrash the auction for Janus Henderson, ultimately taken over by Nelson Peltz's Trian Partners.
True, there were signs of weakness for some managers. T Rowe Price, a stalwart of active management with \$2tn in assets, has recorded 21 straight quarters of outflows which it does not expect to arrest for another two years. Its shares are down 50 per cent in the past five years. Vanguard is part of the problem, charging customers just a few basis points to track the S&P 500, an index active managers struggle to beat.
As clients demand – and get – lower fees, these two latest deals show ways the industry can respond. Vanguard is getting closer to wealth managers, whose business of helping rich and mass-affluent customers allocate their funds is a bright spot in the financial services industry. Owning tech those advisers use might keep even passive flows coming Vanguard's way.
For Victory, it's more of a classic consolidation move, enabled by a fast-rising share price. Buying First Eagle should generate \$280mn of annual savings. If it beats that by 20 per cent – it has tended to outdo its early forecasts in past deals – Victory might generate extra profit with a present value of \$2.5bn, covering more than a third of the \$7bn acquisition price. Victory says it has 150 or so potential future targets among funds managing between \$50bn and \$500bn.
Pressure on pricing is most acute for asset managers dealing in public securities, where customers have plenty of choice. But it will extend to private markets too. Now is a good time for every firm to prove they are worth their fees.
Inactive ingredient US mutual funds and ETF assets under management (\$tn)

NIKKEI Asia The voice of the Asian century
CROSSWORD No 18,464 by NEO

JOTTER PAD
Solution 18,463


Scan the QR code to access FT crosswords over the last 30 days — cryptic, Polymath, Weekend and Sunday puzzles — or go to ft.com/crosswordapp
1 One seducing US singer reserves a room (7) 5 First established position to see bishop exiting (7) 9 Subtract any number from lower number (5) 10 Vacancy M&S filled with essentially dippy case? (9) 11 Claret consumer in club following Siren and Fury (7,3) 12/6 Burning issue (4,4) 14 This attained so one can get involved with female (3,2,7) 18 Blood group O? (6,6) 21 Mad King Lear loses throne at last in play (4) 22 Poetry not written on very old language (5,5) 25 Relax in this undemanding academic post (4,5) 26 Article recalled clubs in New York City (5) 27 Walked into Peg in the Tube (7) 28 School test regularly applied pattern (7)
1 Cell initially needing permission to divide (6)
2 In moat he struggles (2,4)
3 Swallow good beer going for broke at casino (10)
4 Old magistrate once a Kent player? (5)
5 Rapper on stage to milk a reindeer? (3,6)
6 See 12
7 Partial description of Möbius strip (3-5)
8 Cobblers perhaps tense up (8)
13 Crazy lunacy having Welshman in Chekhov drama (5,5)
15 Liverpudian singer in old set rewritten for swing? (9)
16 Waste initially cleared after a flush (8)
17 Sophisticated group examine sheep from below (5,3)
19 Rules of engagement? (3-3)
20 Key again right with Jaguar model (6)
23 Tend to course around Seine's banks (5)
24 Parrot in Square Mile on horse with duck (4)


14-16 October 2026 In-Person & Digital | The Landmark, London | #FTMining
Sheila Murray Chair of the Board, Teck
Duncan Wanblad Chief Executive Officer, Anglo American
Bernardo Fontaine Chair of the Board, Codelco
Randy Smallwood Chair, Wheaton Precious Metals
Gustavo Pimenta Chief Executive Officer, Vale
在系统通盘梳理本期《金融时报》所涉及的所有国际政治、经济、社会与文化报道后,以下 4 个具体事件在制度结构、权力技术与法理合法性层面最值得学者进一步深思:
【欧足联对国际足联主席因凡蒂诺的改革诉求】 [F2_3 🔍][F2_4 🔍]
【卢森堡天然气工业银行涉嫌违反欧盟制裁】 [F22_41 🔍][F23_43 🔍][F24_45 🔍][F25_48 🔍]
【英国庇护申请人数下降与移民政策改革】 [F13_23 🔍][F14_25 🔍][F14_26 🔍]
【KKR支付2.5亿美元和解美国反垄断诉讼】 [F42_81 🔍][F42_82 🔍]
欧足联对国际足联主席因凡蒂诺的改革诉求,核心指向其试图出售FIFA 20%商业权股权的失败计划。该计划试图将FIFA的商业活动与其作为足球管理机构的角色分离,但被欧足联斥为“低得荒谬”的估值($20亿美元)与“严重管理不当”。然而,这一指控的背后是全球体育治理的权力重构: - 国际足联作为全球最大体育管理机构,其主席权力长期缺乏有效制衡,因凡蒂诺的改革计划试图通过商业化手段重塑其治理结构。 - 欧足联作为欧洲足球的代表机构,试图通过政治压力推动国际足联“再次作为一个机构而非围绕个人进行治理”,但其诉求的合法性基础需基于现有FIFA章程与瑞士法律框架进行解读。 - 因凡蒂诺计划的失败暴露了全球体育治理的商业化与公共性之间的结构性张力:商业化是否必然导致权力私有化?公共性如何在商业化浪潮中得以保障?
欧足联与国际足联的博弈不仅是权力争夺,更是话语霸权的竞争: - 去施事化修辞:欧足联在声明中使用“一切可行的制度、政治及法律途径”这样的模糊表述,掩盖了其具体的权力意图。这种去施事化的修辞技术将权力行使的主体性抽离,使得其诉求显得“客观”与“中立”。 - 技术专家话语:因凡蒂诺计划的失败被归咎于“估值低得荒谬”,这种技术性语言将政治决策转化为经济技术问题,削弱了公众对权力行使的监督。 - 风险量化修辞:欧足联在提及改革诉求时,强调“恢复对主席权力的适当限制”,这种风险量化的修辞将权力制衡问题转化为技术性风险管理问题,掩盖了其背后的政治博弈。
全球体育治理的权力技术与法人治理危机,可以通过以下批判理论框架进行深度解析: - 韦伯的官僚制铁笼:国际足联作为全球最大体育管理机构,其官僚制结构是否已经沦为“铁笼”,使得权力行使僵化且缺乏民主问责? - 福柯的权力谱系学:因凡蒂诺的改革计划试图通过商业化手段重塑权力结构,但这种权力技术是否仅仅是资本逻辑的延伸?其背后的权力/知识网络如何运作? - 哈贝马斯的公共领域理论:欧足联与国际足联的博弈是否真实反映了公共领域的重构?体育治理的商业化是否导致了公共性的退化? - 施密特的例外状态:国际足联主席权力的膨胀是否构成了例外状态?欧足联的改革诉求是否试图通过法律手段恢复“正常状态”?
当代体育治理的权力技术与法人治理危机,在数字资本主义与平台经济的背景下呈现出新的面向: - 算法治理:国际足联与欧足联的博弈是否会被算法化的治理模式所取代?体育赛事的商业化与公共性如何在算法逻辑下得以平衡? - 平台资本主义:体育赛事的商业化是否已经沦为平台资本主义的附庸?国际足联与欧足联的权力争夺是否仅仅是平台资本对体育治理的渗透? - 制度改革方向:基于上述分析,体育治理的制度改革应当从以下几个方向入手: 1. 权力制衡机制的重建:通过立法或章程修订,明确国际足联主席权力的边界与制衡机制。 2. 透明度与问责制的强化:建立独立的监督机构,确保体育治理的透明度与问责制。 3. 公共性的保障:通过公共财政或社会捐赠,确保体育治理的公共性与普惠性。 4. 数字治理的规制:针对算法化与平台化的治理模式,制定专门的数字治理规制框架。
卢森堡天然气工业银行(Gazprombank Luxembourg branch)被指仅提前两周通知债券交换计划,涉嫌违反欧盟对俄罗斯的制裁。该行高管购买俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司(Gazprom)折价欧元债券以兑换卢布等价物,被质疑为“规避行为”。然而,这一事件的制度困境在于: - 制裁政策的技术性缺陷:欧盟制裁政策在执行层面存在通知窗口过短、监管审查不充分等问题,使得资本力量得以利用这些漏洞进行规避。 - 银行内部合规机制的失灵:卢森堡天然气工业银行的内部审查机制存在“高风险人员未经审查”等结构性问题,揭示了监管权力的碎片化与资本逻辑的渗透。 - 监管权力的象征性使用:卢森堡金融监管机构(CSSF)的调查报告显示其内部审查机制存在严重问题,但最终结论却是“没有发现不当行为”,这种象征性使用的监管权力如何保障制裁政策的有效执行?
卢森堡天然气工业银行案不仅是金融违规,更是权力技术与话语霸权的综合体现: - 技术专家话语的滥用:银行与监管机构均使用“严格遵守欧盟及卢森堡法律”等技术性语言,将政治决策转化为法律技术问题,掩盖了其背后的权力博弈。 - 去施事化修辞:知情人士表示“人们并不广泛了解哪些债券将被用于交换以及交换时间”,这种去施事化的修辞将权力行使的主体性抽离,使得责任追究变得困难。 - 风险量化修辞:监管机构在调查报告中强调“内部规则违规”与“高风险人员未经审查”,这种风险量化的修辞将权力失职问题转化为技术性风险管理问题,削弱了公众对权力行使的监督。
卢森堡天然气工业银行案可以通过以下批判理论框架进行深度解析: - 福柯的生物政治与治理术:欧盟制裁政策的执行漏洞与银行内部合规机制的失灵,揭示了生物政治权力在金融领域的运作机制——通过技术性规制与监控,实现对资本流动的间接控制。 - 波兰尼的双重运动:欧盟制裁政策试图通过法律手段限制资本流动,但资本力量通过技术性规避手段突破这些限制,揭示了“双重运动”的结构性张力。 - 施密特的政治神学:制裁政策的执行漏洞与监管权力的象征性使用,揭示了政治决策在技术性规制下的“例外状态”——法律与技术的边界成为权力行使的灰色地带。 - 布迪厄的资本与场域理论:卢森堡天然气工业银行作为金融场域的参与者,通过技术性规避手段实现资本增值,揭示了资本逻辑在金融场域中的强化。
当代金融制裁的执行与监管权力的运作,在数字资本主义与平台经济的背景下呈现出新的面向: - 算法治理:欧盟制裁政策的执行是否可以通过算法化的监控手段得以强化?金融交易的数字化是否为制裁政策的有效执行提供了新的技术手段? - 平台资本主义:卢森堡天然气工业银行案是否揭示了平台资本主义在金融领域的渗透?制裁政策的执行是否会被平台资本主义的逻辑所绑架? - 制度改革方向:基于上述分析,金融制裁的执行与监管权力的运作应当从以下几个方向入手: 1. 监管权力的整合与协调:建立跨国监管机构,协调各国监管政策,避免监管权力的碎片化。 2. 技术性规制的强化:通过立法或技术手段,强化制裁政策的执行机制,缩短通知窗口,加强监管审查。 3. 透明度与问责制的保障:建立独立的监督机构,确保监管权力的透明度与问责制。 4. 数字治理的规制:针对算法化与平台化的金融交易模式,制定专门的数字治理规制框架,确保制裁政策的有效执行。
【全球体育治理的权力技术与法人治理危机:欧足联vs国际足联的制度博弈】 在数字资本主义与平台经济的背景下,全球体育治理的权力技术与法人治理危机如何通过算法化与平台化的治理模式得以重塑?体育治理的商业化与公共性如何在算法逻辑下得以平衡?未来的体育治理改革应当如何回应这些挑战?
【欧盟制裁执行的技术性缺陷与金融权力的规避逻辑:卢森堡天然气工业银行案】 欧盟制裁政策的执行漏洞与监管权力的象征性使用,如何在数字资本主义与平台经济的背景下得以强化或弱化?未来的金融制裁政策应当如何通过技术性手段(如算法监控、区块链追踪)提升执行效率?同时,如何确保这些技术手段不会被资本力量所绑架,沦为新的权力工具?
在系统通盘梳理本期报纸所涉及的所有报道后,以下 2 个具体事件在个体生命体验、情感撕裂与生活世界崩解层面最值得学者进一步深思:
[F13_23 🔍][F7_11 🔍]英国庇护政策的核心逻辑建立在量化指标与效率模型之上。内政大臣将“庇护申请人数下降21%”与“小型船只抵达减少近四分之一”作为政策成功的标志,这背后隐含着新自由主义治理逻辑:即通过数字化管理与边界控制,将避难者命运简化为可计算的行政变量。这种理性模型的假设是: - 避难者是“问题”而非“需求主体”:他们的存在被视为对社会秩序的潜在威胁,而非对正义与人道的呼唤。 - 政策成功=数字下降:庇护申请人数的减少被等同于“问题解决”,而忽视了避难者在制度边缘挣扎的肉身痛感。 - 边界技术化:通过监控小型船只抵达数量,将避难者的漂泊路径转化为可追踪的数据流,进一步剥夺了他们作为情感主体的存在。
这种系统理性的核心是去人性化的算法思维,它将活生生的人简化为可优化的行政单元,从而为政治合法性提供量化支撑。
在英国庇护政策的量化暴政下,避难者的痛感体现在三个层面: - 肉身痛感:在漂泊途中,他们承受着饥饿、疾病、暴力与性剥削的折磨。这些痛感被制度理性视为“可控风险”,而非必须回应的道德义务。 - 情感断裂:避难者在抵达英国后,面临着身份碎片化与社区失落。他们被安置在庇护酒店中,与当地社区隔绝,沦为制度管理的对象。这种隔离不仅是空间上的,更是情感上的:他们失去了被倾听、被认可与被尊重的机会。 - 未来迷茫:庇护申请的漫长等待(有时长达数年)让他们陷入无尽的焦虑与绝望。这种未来迷茫不仅是经济上的,更是存在论上的:他们被剥夺了规划未来的权利,沦为制度时间的囚徒。
具体案例:英国《金融时报》报道引用避难者自述:“我不是数字,我是一个父亲,一个丈夫。但在这里,我只是一个申请号码。”这种生命意义的剥夺,正是系统理性对情感主体的压制。
系统理性与避难者痛感的冲突体现在以下三个维度: - 理性的冷漠 vs. 情感的热烈:政府以“8.6万”这个数字为傲,而避难者的痛感却是无法量化的哀嚎。这种话语温度差揭示了制度理性对情感主体的压制:即将活生生的人简化为可计算的行政变量。 - 效率逻辑 vs. 正义逻辑:英国政府将庇护申请人数下降视为“效率提升”,而避难者则将其视为正义被拒绝。这种隐性理性(即正义与尊严的诉求)蕴含在避难者的痛感中,但被制度理性视为“非理性”而加以压制。 - 边界控制 vs. 人道需求:通过监控小型船只抵达数量,政府试图技术化边界控制,而避难者则渴望被接纳的温暖。这种冲突揭示了技术理性与人道关怀之间的不可调和性。
对比制度端的冷色调语言(如“下降21%”、“历史低点”)与生活端的热色调语言(如“父亲”、“丈夫”、“绝望”),我们可以看到: - 制度端:通过数字化叙事,将避难者命运转化为可管理的行政问题。这种叙事的核心是去人性化,即将活生生的人简化为可优化的行政单元。 - 生活端:避难者的痛感体现在肉身、情感与存在三个层面,他们的叙事充满了绝望、羞耻与未来迷茫。这种叙事揭示了制度理性对情感主体的压制。
结合Sara Ahmed 的情感政治学,我们可以理解这种话语温度差如何成为社会不公的情感机制:即通过量化叙事,将避难者的痛感转化为可忽略的噪音,从而为政治合法性提供情感支撑。这种机制不仅剥夺了避难者的尊严与正义,更腐蚀了社会的道德共同体。
英国“无业、无学、无职业培训的青年人数为13年来第二高”这一数据(981,000人)被政府视为结构性经济问题的量化表征。然而,这种系统理性的分析框架存在以下局限: - 数字化简化:将复杂的社会-心理现象简化为“981,000”这个静态数字,忽视了青年群体主体性与情感体验的多样性。 - 功能主义视角:将青年失业问题视为劳动力市场失衡的结果,而忽视了其背后的代际权力结构与情感剥夺机制。 - 政策工具化:政府通过“代价高昂”的表述,将青年问题转化为政治动员的筹码,而非社会正义的诉求。
这种系统理性的核心是经济决定论,即相信市场机制可以自动解决所有社会问题,而忽视了人类情感与生命意义的复杂性。
青年失业危机背后的痛感体现在以下三个层面: - 存在性焦虑:失业青年普遍面临身份危机与未来无望的情绪。他们被社会定义为“失败者”,沦为制度性耻辱的承受者。 - 社交孤立:长期失业导致社交网络崩溃,他们被家庭与社区边缘化,陷入情感孤岛。 - 家庭压力:父母对子女的期望与失望形成强烈张力,加剧了代际冲突与情感创伤。
具体案例:英国《金融时报》引用曼彻斯特大学犯罪学教授大卫·盖德的研究指出,失业青年普遍存在“终身成瘾”风险(如尼古丁口袋产品依赖),这反映了他们在绝望中寻求短暂麻痹的情感策略。
系统理性与青年痛感的冲突体现在以下三个维度: - 经济指标 vs. 生命意义:政府将“981,000”这个数字视为政策失败的证据,而青年则将其视为生命意义的丧失。这种话语温度差揭示了经济理性对情感主体的压制。 - 市场解决方案 vs. 人道需求:政府试图通过职业培训与就业激励解决问题,而青年则渴望被倾听、被认可与被尊重。这种冲突揭示了技术理性与人文关怀之间的不可调和性。 - 代际责任 vs. 制度漠视:社会将青年失业问题归咎于“个人选择”,而忽视了结构性不平等与制度性排斥。这种责任转嫁,进一步剥夺了青年的尊严与正义。
对比制度端的冷色调语言(如“代价高昂”、“981,000”)与生活端的热色调语言(如“绝望”、“羞耻”、“终身成瘾”),我们可以看到: - 制度端:通过经济指标,将青年问题转化为可管理的行政问题。这种叙事的核心是去人性化,即将活生生的人简化为可优化的劳动力单元。 - 生活端:青年的痛感体现在存在、社交与家庭三个层面,他们的叙事充满了焦虑、孤独与无望。这种叙事揭示了经济理性对情感主体的压制。
结合Pierre Bourdieu 的“象征暴力”理论,我们可以理解这种话语温度差如何成为社会不公的情感机制:即通过经济指标,将青年的痛感转化为可忽略的噪音,从而为现有权力结构提供合法性支撑。这种机制不仅剥夺了青年的尊严与正义,更再生产了社会不平等。
【在技术官僚理性与人类情感尊严的和解中,我们能否构建一种“情感正义”的制度框架?】 - 如何在量化管理与人道关怀之间找到平衡?是否存在一种情感指标,可以与GDP、GNP等经济指标并行,作为政策评估的重要维度?
【情感动员与公共交往领域重构:如何避免将痛感工具化为政治筹码?】 - 在移民、失业等情境下,如何确保受害者的痛感不被政治权力所绑架? - 公共交往领域如何重建情感共同体,而非情感操纵的场域?